Fluoroscopy Group Research Articles

Procedural outcomes of fluoroscopy-less catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

Abstract Background Radiofrequency catheter ablation is superior therapy to antiarrhythmic drugs for maintaining sinus rhythm in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients. Traditional fluoroscopy-guided AF ablation poses risks of prolonged radiation exposure for both patients and medical staff. Recent advancements in fluoroscopy-less catheter ablation techniques offer potential solutions, but comprehensive data on their effectiveness and safety are lacking. Purpose To evaluate the procedural outcomes and safety of fluoroscopy-less catheter ablation for AF compared to fluoroscopy-guided ablation. Methods Retrospective observational study of consecutive AF ablations (N=881) conducted at a university teaching hospital (Hamilton Health Sciences, Hamilton, Ontario) from November 2017 to September 2022. An electro-anatomical mapping system and ICE was used in all cases. Baseline characteristics and procedural outcomes between the fluoroscopy-less and fluoroscopy-guided groups were compared. Cases that used <60 seconds of fluoroscopy (occasionally used by operators during the placement of an esophageal probe) were included in the fluoroscopy-less group (N= 68). Results Mean age of individuals was 60.6 ± 11 years, 71.7% were male, 72.6% had paroxysmal AF, mean CHA2DS2-VASc score was 1.6 ± 1.4, 11.1% had prior heart failure, and mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 57.5 ± 15%. There were no significant differences in patient baseline characteristics between the fluoroscopy-less and fluoroscopy groups. Total procedure and fluoroscopy times were lower in the fluoroscopy-less group compared to the fluoroscopy-guided group (169.3 ±42 minutes vs. 192.1 ±54 minutes, p<0.0001 and 0.024 ±0.10 vs. 10.0 ±7.4 minutes , p<0.0001). Fluoroscopy-less AF ablation remained an independent predictor of lower procedure times following adjusting for the use of general anesthesia, high-power short-duration, presence of trainees, AF pattern, redo cases, and type of mapping system. Complication rates were similar between fluoroscopy-less and fluoroscopy-guided ablation (1.9% vs. 3.8%, p=0.11). Conclusion Fluoroscopy-less catheter ablation for AF appears to have similar procedural outcomes and safety than fluoroscopy-guided AF ablation.

Balloon atrioseptostomy under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guide in patients with congenital heart diseases under 3 months in a national reference pediatric center

Balloon atrioseptostomy is an emergency procedure in congenital heart diseases requiring an atrial septal defect to increase cardiac output in right-sided obstructive lesions or to improve mixing in patients with transposition of the great arteries. This procedure is currently performed with both fluoroscopy and echocardiography. The main objective is to describe our experience with the use of balloon atrioseptostomy under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance in patients under 3 months. A descriptive, comparative and retrospective study in patients in whom balloon atrioseptostomy was performed under echocardiographic and fluoroscopic guidance between 2018 and 2023 in a referral hospital in Peru. 36 patients were analyzed, of which 21 were from the fluoroscopy group. and 15 patients from the echocardiography group. More than 2/3 of the cases were males, and more than 60% of patients in both groups had transposition of the great vessels. No significant differences were found in terms of ventilatory support and inotropic support. The success of the procedure was 100% in both groups, without complications. Both balloon atrioseptostomy performed by fluoroscopy and those performed by echocardiography were successful and without complications, emphasizing that the one performed by echocardiography is performed in the patient's crib, avoiding the transfer of the critical unit to the angiography room and without the use of radiation.

The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during total hip arthroplasty: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

In total hip arthroplasty (THA), the positioning of components holds critical importance for factors such as joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effects of intraoperative fluoroscopy (IF) versus no use of IF on component positioning and the restoration of patient anatomy during THA. We conducted our systematic review following the recommendations outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. The literature search was performed from the inception of medical databases up to August 2023. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, Wanfang, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), China Biology Medicine Disc (CBM), and China Science and Technology Journal (CSTD) databases were systematically searched to identify relevant studies comparing IF versus no IF during primary THA. Thirteen studies involving 2195 patients (2207 hips) were incorporated in the Analysis. No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = .9), ACIA within the safe zone rate (P = .87), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = .42), ACAA within the safe zone rate (P = .35), combined safe zone rate (P = .30), limb length difference (LLD, P = .13), dislocation rate (P = .76), and infection rate (P = .97). In comparison to the no fluoroscopy group, the IF group exhibited prolonged operation time (P < .00001) and reduced femoral component offset difference (FCOD, P = .03). IF did not demonstrate improvements in acetabular cup placement, limb length difference, or dislocation occurrence. Nonetheless, IF showed a significant enhancement in restoring femoral offset. It is noteworthy that surgeons operating in facilities with lower patient volumes may observe more pronounced benefits from IF.

Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of the knee improves the accuracy of stem anteversion in total hip arthroplasty with direct anterior approach using traction table.

Stem anteversion (SA) in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is crucial for postoperative outcomes, affecting dislocation risk and hip function. Accurate SA placement is challenged by intraoperative estimation methods, with discrepancies reported between predicted and true SA. This study investigates the effect of conventional methods and intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation on SA accuracy in THA performed with a direct anterior approach using a traction table. This involves 200 patients undergoing primary THA from August 2019 to January 2023, divided into a conventional group (n = 100) and a fluoroscopic group (n = 100). Postoperative SA measurements were conducted using computed tomography scans. Statistical analysis focused on comparing the SA angles and the prevalence of excessive SA (≥>35° and ≥>40°) between the groups. The fluoroscopic group showed a lower average SA angle (24.3° ± 8.3°) compared to the conventional group (30.0° ± 11.3°), with a statistically significant difference (p < 0.01). Excessive SA (≥>40°) was found in 17% of the conventional group, significantly reduced to 5% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01). Similarly, SA exceeding 35° was present in 39% of the conventional group, compared to only 11% in the fluoroscopic group (p < 0.01), indicating a substantial reduction in excessive SA placements with fluoroscopic guidance. The study demonstrates that intraoperative fluoroscopic guidance significantly enhances the accuracy of SA placement in THA, reducing the variability and proportion of excessive SA. This suggests a critical reevaluation of conventional estimation methods in favor of fluoroscopic confirmation to improve surgical outcomes. Intraoperative fluoroscopic confirmation of knee external rotation angle markedly decreases the proportion of excessive SA and enhances the precision of stem placement in THA with a direct anterior approach. This technique represents a significant advancement in surgical practice, offering a simple and effective method to achieve optimal postoperative results.

Robot-assisted versus traditional fluoroscopy-assisted posterior fixation in treatment of thoracolumbar fractures with ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study

To compare the effectiveness of robot-assisted (RA) minimally invasive surgery versus traditional fluoroscopy-assisted (FA) open posterior fixation surgery in treating thoracolumbar fractures with ankylosing spondylitis (AS). A clinical data of 21 cases of thoracolumbar fractures with AS who met the selection criteria between December 2016 and December 2023 was retrospectively analyzed. Ten cases underwent RA minimally invasive surgery group (RA group) and 11 cases underwent FA open posterior fixation surgery (FA group). There was no significant difference in gender, age, fracture segment distribution, fracture type, time from injury to surgery, visual analogue scale (VAS) score, and American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) grading between RA group and FA group ( P>0.05). The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, radiation exposure time, radiation dose, hospital stay, and complications of the two groups were recorded. According to Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the accuracy of screw implantation was evaluated by CT within 1 week after surgery. During follow-up, pain and nerve function were evaluated by VAS score and ASIA grading. All patients underwent surgery successfully, and there was no significant difference in operation time ( P>0.05). The intraoperative blood loss and hospital stay in the RA group were significantly less than those in the FA group ( P<0.05), and the radiation exposure time and radiation dose were significantly more than those in the FA group ( P<0.05). A total of 249 pedicle screws were implanted in the two groups, including 118 in the RA group and 131 in the FA group. According to the Gertzbein-Robbins criteria, the proportion of clinically acceptable screws (grades A and B) in the RA group was significantly higher than that in the FA group ( P<0.05). Patients in both groups were followed up 3-12 months, with an average of 6.8 months. The VAS scores of the two groups after surgery were significantly lower than those before surgery, and the differences were significant ( P<0.05). The RA group had lower scores than the fluoroscopy group at 1 week and 3 months after surgery ( P<0.05). There was no significant difference in neurological function grading between groups at 1 week and 3 months after surgery ( P>0.05). In the FA group, 1 case of deep infection and 1 case of deep vein thrombosis of lower extremity occurred, while no complication occurred in the RA group, and there was no significant difference in the incidence of complications between groups ( P>0.05). Both RA minimally invasive surgery and FA open posterior fixation surgery can achieve good effectiveness. Compared with the latter, the former has more advantages in terms of intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion.

Efficacy and safety of navigation robot-assisted versus conventional oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation in the treatment of lumbar degenerative diseases: A retrospective study.

Effective internal fixation with pedicle screw is a key factor in the success of lumbar fusion with internal fixation. Whether navigation robots can improve the efficacy and safety of screw placement is controversial. Thirty-eight patients who underwent oblique lateral lumbar interbody fusion internal fixation from March 2022 to May 2023 were retrospectively analyzed, 16 cases in the navigational robot group and 22 cases in the fluoroscopy group. Using visual analog score (VAS) for the low back and lower limbs, Oswestry Disability Index to compare the clinical efficacy of the 2 groups; using perioperative indexes such as the duration of surgery, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative fluoroscopy times, and postoperative hospital stay to compare the safety of the 2 groups; and using accuracy of pedicle screws (APS) and the facet joint violation (FJV) to compare the accuracy of the 2 groups. Postoperative follow-up at least 6 months, there was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups in the baseline data (P > .05). The navigational robot group's VAS-back was significantly lower than the fluoroscopy group at 3 days postoperatively (P < .05). However, the differences between the 2 groups in VAS-back at 3 and 6 months postoperatively, and in VAS-leg and Oswestry Disability Index at 3 days, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively were not significant (P > .05). Although duration of surgery in the navigational robot group was significantly longer than in the fluoroscopy group (P > .05), the intraoperative blood loss and the intraoperative fluoroscopy times were significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). The difference in the PHS between the 2 groups was not significant (P > .05). The APS in the navigation robot group was significantly higher than in the fluoroscopy group, and the rate of FJV was significantly lower than in the fluoroscopy group (P < .05). Compared with the traditional fluoroscopic technique, navigation robot-assisted lumbar interbody fusion with internal fixation provides less postoperative low back pain in the short term, with less trauma, less bleeding, and lower radiation exposure, as well as better APS and lower FJV, resulting in better clinical efficacy and safety.

Effect of Bedside Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Transvenous Cardiac Temporary Pacing in Children with Bradyarrhythmia.

To compare the efficacy and safety of bedside ultrasound-guided and fluoroscopy-guided transvenous cardiac temporary pacing in the treatment of bradyarrhythmia in children. Children treated by temporary intravenous cardiac pacing from January 2016 to June 2023 in Hunan Provincial Children's Hospital were enrolled, and the characteristics and data of the cases were summarized. Patients were divided into bedside ultrasound-guided group (ultrasound group) and fluoroscopy-guided group (fluoroscopy group) according to the implantation guidance methods. The efficacy, safety, and incidence of complications in children were compared, and follow-up analysis was carried out. A total of 30 children were enrolled, including 18 males and 12 females, with a median age of 5.5 (2.9, 10.0) years and a median weight of 18.7 (12.7, 32.7) kg. The most common primary diseases were fulminant myocarditis (13/30 cases) and congenital high-grade AVB (10/30 cases). Among them, the proportion of congenital high AVB in the fluoroscopy group was significantly higher than that in the ultrasound group, and the difference was statistically significant (p = 0.007). The implantation process was successful in all 30 children. From the time of pacing decision to implantation, the median time of ultrasound group was 56 (30, 60) min and that of fluoroscopy group was 154 (78,180) min, with a statistically significant difference (P < 0.001). A total of 5 cases developed complications. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with traditional fluoroscopic temporary pacing, bedside ultrasound-guided temporary pacing technology can effectively shorten the operation time and reduce the occurrence of complications and has become a better choice for children's emergency and critical care treatment. The right internal jugular vein is preferred for intravenous implantation.

Fluoroscopy-only guided transcatheter patent foramen ovale closure: the importance of pre-procedural echocardiography.

Percutaneous closure of a patent foramen ovale (PFO) to prevent recurrent paradoxical thromboembolic events has become the standard of care. However, it remains uncertain if transesophageal echocardiography (TOE) guidance improves procedural success with an existing comprehensive pre-procedural TOE. The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of percutaneous PFO closure guided by fluoroscopy (FS) only vs TOE plus FS. Consecutive patients undergoing percutaneous PFO closure between February 2017 and April 2023 were analyzed. Based on pre-procedural echocardiography, patients were scheduled either for an FS-only or TOE/FS-guided procedure. The primary-endpoint was effective PFO-closure (residual-shunt grade 0/1 at 6-month follow-up). The secondary-endpoints included procedural safety/efficacy and major adverse cardiovascular events during hospital stay and at the 6-month follow-up. Two hundred-three patients (mean age 51.8 ± 12.5 years, 39.4% women, Risk of Paradoxical Embolism score = 7 [IQR = 6-7]) underwent PFO closure with FS-only guidance (88 patients, 43.3%) or TOE/FS guidance (115 patients, 56.7%). The main indications for PFO closure were cryptogenic stroke (179 patients, 88.2%) and peripheral embolism (13 patients, 6.4%). At baseline, a right-to-left shunt of grade 2 or higher was present in 199 patients (98%). The procedure time in the FS group was shorter (13 minutes in the FS group vs 16.5 minutes in the TOE/FS group, P = .002). The immediate procedural success was 99.5%. At 6 months, effective closure was achieved in 195 patients (96.1% [FS group: 97.7% vs TOE/FS group 97.8%, P = .29]). The rates of atrial fibrillation and recurrent thromboembolic events were not different among the procedural strategies (3.9% [P = .47] and 0.5% [P = .43]). After comprehensive pre-procedural echocardiography workup, PFO closure with FS guidance only seems equally safe and effective as TOE/FS guidance. A standardized pre-procedural echocardiography protocol facilitates procedural planning with excellent echocardiographic and clinical outcomes.

Ultrasound-Guided Cervical Selective Nerve Root Block versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Interlaminar Epidural Injection for Cervical Radicular Pain: A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Study.

Ultrasound (US)-guided cervical selective nerve root block (CSNRB) procedures are increasingly being performed as an alternative to conventional fluoroscopy (FL)-guided epidural injections for the treatment of cervical radicular pain. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of US-guided CSNRB versus FL-guided interlaminar cervical epidural steroid injection (IL-CESI) for cervical radicular pain. A total of 60 patients with cervical radicular pain due to a single-level disc herniation were randomized into either the FL or US group. The numeric rating scale, Short Form-36, and neck disability index were evaluated before treatment at months 1, 3, and 6 after treatment. Procedure time, complications, pain medication consumption, and patient satisfaction were also recorded. Patients experienced significant improvement in pain, disability, and quality of life scores up to 6 months after the procedure (p < 0.001). Treatment success rate was achieved in 56.6% of the IL-CESI group and 50% of the CSNRB group without any significant difference between the study arms (p = 0.617). US-guided CSNRB was shown to be as effective as the FL-guided IL-CESI in the treatment of cervical radicular pain, in addition to the absence of radiation exposure and requiring less procedure time.

Effectiveness of Ultrasonography- and Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Injections in the Management of Chronic Lumbar Disc Disease: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Lumbar disc disease is one of the common causes of lower back pain caused by a change in the structure of the normal disc. Most of the time, disc disease happens as a result of aging and the normal breakdown that occurs within the disc.Caudal epidural steroid injections are the popular treatment for patients with chronic low back pain that does not respond to conservative management. A retrospective survey was administered to 160 patients whohad received caudal epidural injections forchronic low back pain in the past, but only 74 patients who completed the scheduled follow-ups were included in the study. They were divided into two groups based on the imaging modality used for guiding the caudal epiduralsteroid injections, either ultrasonography or fluoroscopy, and thenassessed for improvement in pain on the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS), forfunctional improvement on theOswestry Disability Index (ODI), and for satisfaction on the North American Spine Society Patient Satisfaction Scale (SSPSS). Mean NRS pain scores improved significantly from baseline at 6.78 and 7.00 in the fluoroscopy and ultrasound groups, respectively, to 2.03 and 2.16 at 12 weeks post-procedure. The difference between the groups was not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The Oswestry Disability Index was completed at baseline and after 12 weeks of follow-up for both groups, and there was no significant difference between the two groups; the fluoroscopy group's mean Oswestry Disability Index scores were 52.4 at baseline and 35.6 at 12 weeks, whereas the scores for the ultrasound group were 50.3 at baseline and 37.9 at 12 weeks. Conversely, patient satisfaction as assessed using the SSPSS rose in both groups up to 12 weeks (p > 0.05). The ultrasound- and fluoroscopy-guided caudal epidural steroid injections proved equally effective in easing the pain, disability, and satisfaction levels of patients with chronic lower back pain.

Near-zero fluoroscopy technique for cardiac electronic device implantation: long-term outcomes

Abstract Introduction Radiation hazards are a major concern for both patients and staff. We have previously described a near-zero fluoroscopy technique for cardiac electronic device implantation. In this study, we aimed to investigate the long-term safety of this technique and compare outcomes and procedural metrics with a conventional approach in a larger population. Methods Low-dose fluoroscopy technique. Radiation exposure during fluoroscopy is directly proportional to the time the unit is activated. Typically, the pedal switch is depressed for at least a few seconds per imaging sequence in order to visualize "live" movements of either the leads during their positioning or the needle during a fluoroscopy-guided puncture of the subclavian vein. Our technique consists of setting a low frame rate per second (0.5-3.75fps) and momentarily triggering the foot pedal switch only to obtain screenshots of the position of the leads/needle. Use of live electrograms to assist spatial awareness of lead position (e.g. Atrial, Coronary Sinus, Ventricular signals) acts as an adjunct to guidance. Study design We included consecutive patients undergoing permanent pacemaker (PPM) or cardiac defibrillator (ICD) implant at our center from July 2018 to December 2022 using the near-zero fluoroscopy technique. Procedures were performed by three operators (AC, MD, MF). Cumulative radiation dose was measured using dose-area product (DAP). We assessed procedure success and complication rate during long-term follow-up. We compared the procedural metrics and outcomes with a cohort of patients with PPM or ICD implanted in our centre by senior operators, using a traditional fluoroscopic approach. Propensity score was adopted to match baseline characteristics between the study and control group. Results The total population consisted of 412 patients (74.2±13.9 years, 60.9% male). We included 206 who underwent PPM or ICD implantation using the low-dose fluoroscopy technique, and 206 matched-control. A PPM or ICD was successfully implanted in all patients. Fluoroscopy time and DAP were significantly lower in the low-dose fluoroscopy group, mean 2.3±2.0 seconds versus 258.4±252.1 seconds (P&amp;lt;0.001) and 3.4±3.5 µGym2 versus 29.8±55.4 µGym2 (P&amp;lt;0.001), respectively. Mean procedure time was 49.0±20.8 minutes in the low fluoroscopy group and 65.7±26.8 minutes in the control group (P&amp;lt;0.001). Median frame per second setting was 0.5 in the low-dose cohort. After a mean follow-up of 441±470 days, the rate of complications was identical across groups (2.4%, p = 1.0). Conclusion This near-zero dose fluoroscopy technique is effective and safe, enabling a 10x reduction in radiation exposure during device implant. Modification of traditional implant and imaging techniques can provide material reductions in fluoroscopy dose to even below that for a standard PA chest radiograph.

The Learning Curve From Converting From Fluoroscopic to Robotic-Assisted Direct Anterior Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Robotic-assisted total hip arthroplasty (RA-THA) provides an alternative to fluoroscopic guidance, thus reducing radiation exposure for orthopaedic surgeons. This study was performed to assess the learning curve associated with the adoption of RA-THA using the direct anterior approach (DAA) with regard to surgical time, use of fluoroscopy, and implant placement. In addition, we compared complication rates and patient-reported outcome scores between both cohorts. A case report of an RA-THA is also presented. This was a retrospective, non-randomized evaluation of the learning curve by assessing surgical time on a consecutive series of 89 DAA cases performed by a single surgeon. There were 53 cases that had manual THA with fluoroscopy and 36 cases with RA-THA. All cases had an acetabular component placement target of 40° inclination and 20° anteversion. An independent reviewer blinded to surgical technique used the Widmer method to measure acetabular inclination and version. Patient demographics were similar for both groups. The mean surgical time for the manual fluoroscopic group was 88 ± 21 minutes and 101 ± 14 minutes for the RA-THA group. After 15 RA-THA cases, surgical time reached time neutral compared to the manual fluoroscopic group. The first 17 RA-THA cases utilized fluoroscopy to verify implant position until the surgeon became comfortable with the accuracy of the RA-THA system. After case 17, fluoroscopy was abandoned in all subsequent RA-THA cases. The mean radiation dose delivered to the surgical field was 5.61 ± 5.71 mGy. Manual THA with fluoroscopy resulted in a mean acetabular inclination of 41.3 ± 4.4° and a mean anteversion of 22.4 ± 3.0°. The RA-THA resulted in a mean acetabular inclination of 42.0 ± 4.2° and a mean anteversion of 22.3 ± 3.9°. There was no noted change in RA-THA placement accuracy after case 17, when fluoroscopy was eliminated from the surgical workflow. There were no statistical differences between the manual fluoroscopic and robotic-assisted groups with respect to complications and clinical PROM outcomes. The DAA THA can be performed with RA-THA and achieve comparable acetabular placement without fluoroscopy. Surgical time was higher for the RA-THA group during the learning curve, but then decreased and was consistent with the manual fluoroscopic group after 15 cases.

Combined Ultrasound and Fluoroscopy versus Ultrasound versus Fluoroscopy-Guided Caudal Epidural Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Unilateral Lower Lumbar Radicular Pain: A Retrospective Comparative Study.

Background and Objectives: This study aimed to evaluate the mid-term effectiveness and safety of a combined ultrasound (US) and fluoroscopy (FL)-guided approach in comparison to US-guided and FL-guided caudal epidural steroid injections (CESI) for treating unilateral lower lumbar radicular pain. Materials and Methods: A total of 154 patients who underwent CESI between 2018 and 2022 were included. Patients were categorized into three groups based on the guidance method: combined US and FL (n = 51), US-guided (n = 51), and FL-guided (n = 52). The study design was retrospective case-controlled, utilizing patient charts and standardized forms to assess clinical outcomes, adverse events, complications during the procedures. Results: In all groups, Oswestry Disability Index and Verbal Numeric Scale scores improved at 1, 3, and 6 months after the last injection, with no significant differences between groups (p < 0.05). The treatment success rate at all time points was also similar among the groups. Logistic regression analysis showed that injection method, cause, sex, age, number of injections, and pain duration did not independently predict treatment success. Blood was aspirated before injection in 2% (n = 1), 13.5% (n = 7), and 4% (n = 2) of patients in the combined US and FL groups, FL-guided groups, and US-guided groups, respectively. Intravascular contrast spread was detected in one patient in the combined method groups and seven in the FL-guided groups. Conclusions: When comparing pain reduction and functional improvement, there was no significant difference between the three methods. The combined method took less time compared to using FL alone. The combined approach also showed a lower occurrence of intravascular injection compared to using FL alone. Moreover, blood vessels at the injection site can be identified with an ultrasound using the combined method. Given these advantages, it might be advisable to prioritize the combined US- and FL-guided therapy when administering CESI for patients with unilateral lumbar radicular pain.

Comparison of Combined Guidance of Fluoroscopy and Ultrasonography in Total Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy with the Standard Method: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Utilizing the combination of fluoroscopy and ultrasonography during Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy (PCNL) to minimize radiation exposure. In this randomized clinical trial, 118 patients with urinary stones who were candidates for PCNL surgery in the prone position were selected and divided into two groups (with an allocation ratio of 1:1). Cases were grouped according to whether ultrasonography was used for renal tract dilation and Amplatz sheath placement. The number of attempts to establish proper renal access, the time interval between access to the targeted calyx and nephroscope entrance, and the Clavien-Dindo score were collected. The mean age of all patients was 46.12 ± 11.28 (45.6 ± 11.2 in the total fluoroscopy group and 46.5 ± 11.4 in the combined group) years (20-66). The intergroup differences in the baseline features were not significant. The mean duration of fluoroscopy time was significantly reduced in the combined guidance group (36.22 ± 10.73 vs. 23.05±8.94 seconds, (P-value = 0.001). Moreover, the difference in the distribution of Amplatz location on the nephroscopy time was meaningful (P-value = 0.016). However, intergroup differences in the number of attempts to successful puncture, length of hospitalization, recovery time, and postoperative complications, including gross hematuria duration, blood loss volume, pack cells requirement, pain score immediately and 6 hours after the surgery, and Clavien-Dindo score were not meaningful. It can be concluded that the use of ultrasound with X-ray in prone PCNL compared to the use of X-rays alone can significantly reduce the duration of radiation without increasing the risk of intra-operative and postoperative detrimental events.

Use of echocardiography in percutaneous closure of patent ductus arteriosus at the Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño, San Borja, Lima - Peru.

Percutaneous occlusion of patent ductus arteriosus (PDA) has classically been performed entirely by fluoroscopy, however in recent years, transthoracic echocardiography (TE) has been used as an aid to fluoroscopy or entirely by echocardiography, which avoids access of femoral artery, use of contrast and decrease in time and dose of radiation exposure. The objective of this study was to evaluate the success rate with the use of TE in percutaneous PDA closure. Descriptive, comparative, retrospective study between patients in whom PDA closure was performed with fluoroscopy plus angiography (group 1) and fluoroscopy plus ET (group 2), between January 2018 and December 2022. The data were obtained from the clinical history electronic and procedure report. One hundred eight patients were analyzed, fluoroscopy group (n: 57) and TE (n: 51). The success rate in PDA occlusion using TE was 100% and 98% for the fluoroscopy group, with no statistically significant difference The average age of group 2 was 2.9 years, while the average age of group 1 was 5 years (p=0.001), the average fluoroscopy time in group 1 was 16.9 min and 4.71 min in group 2 (p < 0.001); the fluoroscopy dose in group 1 was 68.98 mGy and 5.17 mGy in group 2 (p<0.001). Krichenko, but without significant difference in both groups. The success rate of percutaneous PDA closure using echocardiography and fluoroscopy is appropiate, with a success rate similar to the classic technique. In addition, it makes it possible to reduce the dose and time of fluoroscopy, avoid the use of contrast, and access the femoral artery.

The accuracy of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy compared to fluoroscopy in navigation of transbronchial lung cryobiopsy in patients with interstitial lung disease

BackgroundSafely implementing transbronchial lung cryobiopsy (TBLC) in patients with interstitial lung disease (ILD) requires accurate navigation. Traditional fluoroscopy falls short in reducing the risk of post-procedure pneumothorax. The potential of electromagnetic navigation bronchoscopy (ENB) as a more precise navigation method warrants further exploration.MethodsA prospective cohort study was conducted on ILD patients undergoing TBLC. Patients were assigned either fluoroscopy or ENB for cryoprobe positioning. Navigation accuracy was evaluated using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) images as the standard. Safety and diagnostic yield were also observed.ResultsSeventeen patients underwent TBLC, with 10 guided by fluoroscopy and seven by ENB. Fluoroscopy-guided cryoprobe navigation required more adjustments [9/15 (60%) v.s. 1/9 (11%), p = 0.018] for subsequent TBLC compared to ENB, as confirmed by CBCT images. Clinical characteristics, post-procedure complications, and biopsy specimen size showed no significant differences between the groups. Fourteen patients obtained a pathological diagnosis, and 15 received a multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) diagnosis. In the fluoroscopy group, three patients failed to obtain a pathological diagnosis, and two failed to obtain an MDD diagnosis.ConclusionsENB demonstrates significantly superior accuracy in TBLC navigation compared to traditional fluoroscopy when CBCT images are used as a reference. Further studies are necessary to determine the value of ENB in TBLC navigation for ILD patients.

Comparative outcome of ultrasound guided vs. fluoroscopy guided hydrodilatation in adhesive capsulitis: a prospective study.

The incidence of adhesive capsulitis varies from 2-5% in the general population to 20% in people with diabetes. One of the most effective treatment methods is hydrodilatation, which can be done under US-guidance or Fluoroscopic guidance. However, the clinical effectiveness of US-guided injections in comparison to fluoroscopy-guided injections is still debatable. The possibility of severe side effects, the expense, and the time required to carry out this minimally invasive procedure highlight how crucial it is for patients to have a precise intra-articular injection. This study aims to compare the effectiveness of Ultrasound-guided vs. Fluoroscopic guided hydrodilatation for patients with adhesive capsulitis. Sixty-four patients were randomly selected for hydrodilatation using any one of the techniques. The patients were evaluated for clinical improvements using the visual analog scale (VAS), oxford shoulder score (OSS), and range of motion (ROM). The US-guided group experienced more pain reduction than the fluoroscopy group within the first four weeks (P < 0.001). The increase in ROM was much more significant in the US-guided group for the first 8 weeks. Improvement in Abduction and External rotation was much more significant (P < 0.001) in the first 4 weeks after hydrodilatation in the US-guided group. The improvement in ROM was maintained on long-term follow-up (mean 24 months), with 45 out of 64 (70.3%) reporting a normal or near normal ROM. On assessing the Oxford shoulder score improvements, the US-guided group's score significantly increased after the first week (P = 0.003), but the fluoroscopy-guided group's score increased after the second week. On comparison between the two groups, the amount of score improvement was more significant in the US-guided group than in the fluoroscopy-guided group in the first 4 weeks (P < 0.001). US-guided technique for intra-articular injection for patients with adhesive capsulitis provided a quicker pain reduction and a larger improvement in range of motion and overall shoulder functions.

The effect of intraoperative fluoroscopy on acetabular component positioning and patient anatomy restoration during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty: a meta-analysis.

Positioning implant components and restoring patient anatomy during total hip arthroplasty (THA) are essential for joint stability, polyethylene liner wear, and range of motion. Previous studies comparing intraoperative fluoroscopy with no fluoroscopy during the posterior or posterolateral approach have reported conflicting results. This meta-analysis evaluated if intraoperative fluoroscopy improves component positioning and femoral component position compared to no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty. The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses standards were followed when conducting the systematic review. We searched Web of Science, Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Cochrane Library, Highwire, CBM, CNKI, VIP, and Wanfang database in May 2023 to identify studies involving Intraoperative fluoroscopy versus no fluoroscopy during posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty. Finally, we identified 1133 patients (1145 hips) assessed in seven studies. There were no significant differences in terms of acetabular cup inclination angle (ACIA, P = 0.43), ACIA within safe zone rate (P = 0.58), acetabular cup anteversion angle (ACAA, P = 0.46); ACAA within safe zone rate (P = 0.72), Combined safe zone rate (P = 0.28), dislocation rate (P = 0.64) and infection rate (P = 0.94) between two groups. Compared with the no fluoroscopy group, the intraoperative fluoroscopy group had more operation time (P < 0.00001), less femoral component offset difference (FCOD, P = 0.03), and less LLD (P < 0.00001). Even though intraoperative fluoroscopy was not related to an improvement in cup location or dislocation incidence. Our findings demonstrate that the restoration of leg lengths and femoral offset can be significantly improved by using intraoperative fluoroscopy to supplement good surgical skills in THA. The advantages of intraoperative fluoroscopy might become more apparent for surgeons with less experience. To ascertain whether intraoperative fluoroscopy for posterior or posterolateral approach total hip arthroplasty will have clinical benefits and improve the survival of prostheses, more well-powered and well-designed long-term follow-up studies were necessary.

Comparative study to measure femoral malrotation in inter-trochanteric femur fracture done by conventional and fluoroscopic method

: Rotational malalignment following intramedullary nailing in intertrochanteric femur fractures is an under recognized complication. The incidence is varied from 17 to 35% as per literature. In this study we used intraoperative fluoroscopic method to assess anteversion angle, incidence of malalignment and to check whether intraoperative fluoroscopy is useful to reduce incidence of rotational malalignment or not. Twenty patients of intertrochanteric femur fracture who presented to hospital between 1 October 2019 to 30 September 2020 were divided in two groups of 10 patients each. Group 1 was operated with intraoperative fluoroscopic method and group 2 operated by conventional method of intramedullary nailing. Alignment measured as angle of anteversion by post-operative CT scan and comparison between two groups was done.: The incidence of rotational malalignment was 15%. Three patients had significant difference of 15° in anteversion angle compared to opposite normal femur. All these three malalignments were seen in the fluoroscopic group 1 and had unstable fracture patterns. Unstable fracture patterns are at increased risk of rotational malalignment. In intra operative fluoroscopic method distal femur posterior condylar axis is taken in to consideration. Most of the elderly people have some degree of fixed flexion deformity of the knee due to arthritic changes. This requires more internal rotation to achieve straight posterior condylar axis. This may be the reason for internal rotation malalignment in the fluoroscopic method.

Clinical Application of Confocal Laser Endomircoscopy Combined with Cryobiopsy in the Diagnosis of Interstitial Lung Disease

Introduction: Confocal laser endomicroscopy (CLE) has the characteristics of high resolution, real-time imaging, and no radiation, which is helpful for the precise and effective implementation of transbronchial cryobiopsy (TBCB). The study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of TBCB combined with CLE (CLE group) or fluoroscopy (fluoroscopy group) in the diagnosis of interstitial lung disease (ILD). Methods: From a prospective randomized controlled trial, 80 patients with undiagnosed ILD or ILD requiring biopsy between January 2022 and November 2022 were randomly assigned to CLE group and fluoroscopy group. The rate to reach an etiological diagnosis of ILD, maximum cross-sectional area of specimens, operation time, and complications were compared between the two groups. Results: The rate to reach an etiological diagnosis in the CLE group was significantly higher than that in the fluoroscopy group (95.0% vs. 80.0%, p < 0.05), but there was no difference in the maximum cross-sectional area of the specimens (42.1 ± 10.1 mm2 vs. 41.5 ± 10.3 mm2, p > 0.05). In terms of operation time, the CLE group was significantly shorter than the fluoroscopy group (37.6 ± 10.6 min vs. 54.8 ± 24.9 min, p < 0.05). The bleeding volume in the CLE group was significantly lower than that in the fluoroscopy group (4.9 ± 3.6 mL/case vs. 9.0 ± 9.2 mL/case, p < 0.05). Further analysis showed that the incidence of moderate bleeding was also lower in the CLE group (20.0% vs. 75.0%, p < 0.001). In addition, the incidence of pneumothorax in the CLE group was significantly lower than that in the fluoroscopy group (0 vs. 25.0%, p < 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with simple fluoroscopy, the combination of CLE significantly improves the rate of etiological diagnosis, shortens the operation time, and reduces complications such as bleeding and pneumothorax.