Fluoropyrimidine-related Toxicity Research Articles

The burden of rare variants in DPYS gene is a novel predictor of the risk of developing severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity

BackgroundDespite a growing number of publications highlighting the potential impact on the therapy outcome, rare genetic variants (minor allele frequency < 1%) in genes associated to drug adsorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination are poorly studied. Previously, rare germline DPYD missense variants were shown to identify a subset of fluoropyrimidine-treated patients at high risk for severe toxicity. Here, we investigate the impact of rare genetic variants in a panel of 54 other fluoropyrimidine-related genes on the risk of severe toxicity.MethodsThe coding sequence and untranslated regions of 54 genes related to fluoropyrimidine pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics were analyzed by next-generation sequencing in 120 patients developing grade 3–5 toxicity (NCI-CTC vs3.0) and 104 matched controls. Sequence Kernel Association Test (SKAT) analysis was used to select genes with a burden of genetic variants significantly associated with risk of severe toxicity. The statistical association of common and rare genetic variants in selected genes was further investigated. The functional impact of genetic variants was assessed using two different in silico prediction tools (Predict2SNP; ADME Prediction Framework).ResultsSKAT analysis highlighted DPYS and PPARD as genes with a genetic mutational burden significantly associated with risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity (Bonferroni adjusted P = 0.024 and P = 0.039, respectively). Looking more closely at allele frequency, the burden of rare DPYS variants was significantly higher in patients with toxicity compared with controls (P = 0.047, Mann–Whitney test). Carrying at least one rare DPYS variant was associated with an approximately fourfold higher risk of severe cumulative (OR = 4.08, P = 0.030) and acute (OR = 4.21, P = 0.082) toxicity. The burden of PPARD rare genetic variants was not significantly related to toxicity. Some common variants with predictive value in DPYS and PPARD were also identified: DPYS rs143004875-T and PPARD rs2016520-T variants predicted an increased risk of severe cumulative (P = 0.002 and P = 0.001, respectively) and acute (P = 0.005 and P = 0.0001, respectively) toxicity.ConclusionThis work demonstrated that the rare mutational burden of DPYS, a gene strictly cooperating with DPYD in the catabolic pathway of fluoropyrimidines, is a promising pharmacogenetic marker for precision dosing of fluoropyrimidines. Additionally, some common genetic polymorphisms in DPYS and PPARD were identified as promising predictive markers that warrant further investigation.

Implementation of pharmacogenetic testing in oncology: DPYD-guided dosing to prevent fluoropyrimidine toxicity in British Columbia.

Background: Fluoropyrimidine toxicity is often due to variations in the gene (DPYD) encoding dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). DPYD genotyping can be used to adjust doses to reduce the likelihood of fluoropyrimidine toxicity while maintaining therapeutically effective drug levels. Methods: A multiplex QPCR assay was locally developed to allow genotyping for six DPYD variants. The test was offered prospectively for all patients starting on fluoropyrimidines at the BC Cancer Centre in Vancouver and then across B.C., Canada as well as retrospectively for patients suspected to have had an adverse reaction to therapy. Dose adjustments were made for variant carriers. The incidence of toxicity in the first three cycles was compared between DPYD variant allele carriers and non-variant carriers. Subsequent to an initial implementation phase, this test was made available province-wide. Results: In 9months, 186 patients were tested and 14 were found to be heterozygous variant carriers. Fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was higher in DPYD variant carriers. Of 127 non-variant carriers who have completed chemotherapy, 18 (14%) experienced severe (grade ≥3, Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 5.0). Of note, 22% (3 patients) of the variant carriers experienced severe toxicity even after DPYD-guided dose reductions. For one of these carriers who experienced severe thrombocytopenia within the first week, DPYD testing likely prevented lethal toxicity. In DPYD variant carriers who tolerate reduced doses, a later 25% increase led to chemotherapy discontinuation. As a result, a recommendation was made to clinicians based on available literature and expert opinion specifying that variant carriers who tolerated two cycles without toxicity can have a dose escalation of only 10%. Conclusion: DPYD-guided dose reductions were a feasible and acceptable method of preventing severe toxicity in DPYD variant carriers. Even with dose reductions, there were variant carriers who still experienced severe fluoropyrimidine toxicity, highlighting the importance of adhering to guideline-recommended dose reductions. Following the completion of the pilot phase of this study, DPYD genotyping was made available province-wide in British Columbia.

Implementation of upfront DPYD genotyping with a low-cost and high-throughput assay to guide fluoropyrimidine treatment in cancer patients.

Genetic variants in the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) gene are associated with reduced dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity and can cause severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. We assessed the frequency of the four most common and well-established DPYD variants associated with fluoropyrimidine toxicity and implemented a relatively low-cost and high-throughput genotyping assay for their detection. This study includes 457 patients that were genotyped for the DPYD c.1129-5923C>G, c.1679T>G, c.1905 + 1G>A and c.2846A>T variants, either by Sanger sequencing or kompetitive allele specific PCR (KASP) technology. Of these, 172 patients presented toxicity during treatment with fluoropyrimidines (post-treatment group), and 285 were tested before treatment (pretreatment group). Heterozygous DPYD variants were identified in 7.4% of the entire series of 457 patients, being the c.2846A>T the most frequent variant. In the post-treatment group, 15.7% of the patients presented DPYD variants, whereas only 2.5% of the patients in the pretreatment group presented a variant. The KASP assays designed in this study presented 100% genotype concordance with the results obtained by Sanger sequencing. The combined assessment of the four DPYD variants in our population increases the identification of patients at high risk for developing fluoropyrimidine toxicity, supporting the upfront routine implementation of DPYD variant genotyping. Furthermore, the KASP genotyping assay described in this study presents a rapid turnaround time and relatively low cost, making upfront DPYD screening feasible in clinical practice.

Frequency of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in patients with colon cancer from a Mexican oncology center.

e15616 Background: Fluoropyrimidines are chemotherapeutic agents used in various types of cancer such as colorectal, breast, gastric, etc. Approximately 30% of patients treated with fluoropyrimidines present severe toxicity, which can lead to death in around 1% of them. Reduced activity of the enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) can cause severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. The objective of this study was to identify the frequency of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in patients treated at an oncology center from Northeast Mexico. Methods: Retrospective and observational study of patients treated at the Centro Universitario contra el Cáncer (CUCC) in Monterrey, Mexico. Patients older than 18 years with a diagnosis of colon cancer who were treated during 2021 with the diagnosis of colon and considered candidates for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy (5-FU, capecitabine) were included. Pregnant patients were excluded. None of them had a DPYD testing performed. Results: We analyzed 88 patients, of whom 51 (58%) were men, 6 (7%) in stage I, 16 (18%) in stage II, 31 (35%) in stage III, and 35 (40%) in stage IV. The mean age was 59 years, 15 (17%) of them had a PS&gt;2, overall, 94% of patients received fluoropyrimidine-based CT, presenting up to 47 (57%) of toxicities, 26 (32%) in G1, 11 (13%) in G2, and 10 (12%) in G3; no G &gt; 4 toxicities were documented. There were 7 patients (9%) that required CT discontinuation due to toxicity at some point during their treatment (see Table 1). In the subgroup of patients in stage IV, 8 (24%) had PS&gt;2, and 6 (18%) of them had some mutational panel. Conclusions: This is one of the few descriptive studies of toxicities in a population from northeastern Mexico undergoing treatment with fluoropyrimidine-based CT, in which up to 9% of the patients discontinue treatment due to toxicity. Our findings evidence a high percentage of patients with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. DPYD testing has not been widely adopted in most oncology centers in Mexico, mostly because of the limited access to genome sequencing. Genetic studies in this population could identify poor metabolizers patients with a high risk of toxicity before starting treatment. [Table: see text]

Implementation of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency testing in Europe

The main cause for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is deficiency of the metabolizing enzyme dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD). In 2020, the European Medicines Agency (EMA) recommended two methods for pre-treatment DPD deficiency testing in clinical practice: phenotyping using endogenous uracil concentration or genotyping for DPYD risk variant alleles. This study assessed the DPD testing implementation status in Europe before (2019) and after (2021) the release of the EMA recommendations. The survey was conducted from 16 March 2022 to 31 July 2022. An electronic form with seven closed and three open questions was e-mailed to 251 professionals with DPD testing expertise of 34 European countries. A descriptive analysis was conducted. We received 79 responses (31%) from 23 countries. Following publication of the EMA recommendations, 87% and 75% of the countries reported an increase in the amount of genotype and phenotype testing, respectively. Implementation of novel local guidelines was reported by 21 responders (27%). Countries reporting reimbursement of both tests increased in 2021, and only four (18%) countries reported no coverage for any testing type. In 2019, major implementation drivers were 'retrospective assessment of fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity' (39%), and in 2021, testing was driven by 'publication of guidelines' (40%). Although the major hurdles remained the same after EMA recommendations-'lack of reimbursement' (26%; 2019 versus 15%; 2021) and 'lack of recognizing the clinical relevance by medical oncologists' (25%; 2019 versus 8%; 2021)-the percentage of specialists citing these decreased. Following EMA recommendations, 25% of responders reported no hurdles at all in the adoption of the new testing practice in the clinics. The EMA recommendations have supported the implementation of DPD deficiency testing in Europe. Key factors for successful implementation were test reimbursement and clear clinical guidelines. Further efforts to improve the oncologists' awareness of the clinical relevance of DPD testing in clinical practice are needed.

Renal impairment and abnormal liver function tests in pre-therapeutic phenotype-based DPD deficiency screening using uracilemia: a comprehensive population-based study in 1138 patients.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency screening is a pre-therapeutic standard to prevent severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Although several screening methods exist, the accuracy of their results remains debatable. In France, the uracilemia measurement is considered the standard in DPD deficiency screening. The objective of this study was to describe the hyperuracilemia (⩾16 ng/mL) rate and investigate the influence of hepatic and renal impairment in uracilemia measurements since the guidelines were implemented. Using a cohort of 1138 patients screened between 18 October 2018 and 18 October 2021, basic demographic characteristics, date of blood sampling, and potential biological confounders including liver function tests [aspartate aminotransaminase (AST), alanine aminotransaminase (ALT), gamma-glutamyl transferase (γGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), and bilirubin] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were collected. The second same-patient uracilemia analysis was also performed. Temporal change was graphically represented while potential confounders were stratified to show linearity when suspected. Hyperuracilemia was diagnosed in 12.7% (n = 150) samples with 6.7%, 5.4%, 0.5%, and 0.08% between 16 and 20 ng/mL, 20 and 50 ng/mL, 50 and 150 ng/mL, and >150 ng/mL, respectively. The median uracilemia concentration was 9.4 ng/mL (range: 1.2 and 172.3 ng/mL) and the monthly hyperuracilemia rate decreased steadily from >30% to around 9%. Older age, normalized AST, γGT, ALP results, bilirubin levels, and decreased eGFR were linearly associated with higher plasma uracil concentrations (all p < 0.001). In the adjusted multivariate linear model, AST, eGFR, and ALP remained associated with uracilemia (p < 0.05). When measured twice in 39 patients, the median uracilemia rate of change was -2.5%, which subsequently changed the diagnosis in nine patients (23.1%). Better respect of pre-analytical conditions may explain the steady decrease in monthly hyperuracilemia rates over the 3 years. Elevated AST, ALP levels, and reduced eGFR could induce a false increase in uracilemia and second uracilemia measurements modified the first DPD deficiency diagnosis in almost 25% of the patients.

Fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity and DPYD variants c.85T>C, c.496A>G, and c.1236G>A: impact of haplotype.

Dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) is the rate-limiting step in fluoropyrimidines metabolism. Currently, genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing is recommended for four DPYD single nucleotide variants (SNVs). However, the clinical impact of additional DPYD SNVs on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity remains controversial. We assessed common DPYD SNVs c.85T>C, and c.496A>G which are often in linkage disequilibrium with c.1236G>A, a variant currently recommended for DPYD genotyping, in a retrospective cohort of cancer patients who had received fluoropyrimidines (N = 1371). When assessing individual SNVs, during the total chemotherapy treatment period, a significant increased risk of severe grade ≥ 3 toxicity was seen in carriers of c.496A>G (OR = 1.38, 95% CI 1.01-1.88, p = 0.0405) after adjusting for age, sex and treatment drug (capecitabine or 5-Fluorouracil). No association with fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity was seen in patients given standard dosing among those carrying one allele of DPYD c.1236G>A (OR = 1.19, 95% CI 0.59-2.27, p = 0.6147) or c.85T>C (OR = 1.04, 95% CI 0.80-1.62, p = 0.7536). Haplotype analysis confirmed a high linkage disequilibrium of these three variants. Toxicity was not significantly increased in haplotypes containing only one of c.85T>C or c.496A>G or c.1236G>A alleles. However, the haplotype containing both c.85T>C and c.496A>G alleles, which had a predicted frequency of 7.1%, was associated with an increased risk of fluoropyrimidine toxicity (OR = 1.57, 95% CI 1.15-2.13, p = 0.0041). This study suggests DPYD haplotype structure may help explain previous conflicting studies concerning the impact of these variants. Our findings suggest patients with both DPYD c.85T>C and c.496A>G variants have a significant increased risk for toxicity and may potentially benefit from genotype-guided fluoropyrimidine dosing.

Rare genetic variant burden in DPYD predicts severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity risk

Preemptive targeted pharmacogenetic testing of candidate variations in DPYD is currently being used to limit toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidines. The use of innovative next generation sequencing (NGS) approaches could unveil additional rare (minor allele frequency <1%) genetic risk variants. However, their predictive value and management in clinical practice are still controversial, at least partly due to the challenges associated with functional analyses of rare variants. The aim of this study was to define the predictive power of rare DPYD variants burden on the risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity.The DPYD coding sequence and untranslated regions were analyzed by NGS in 120 patients developing grade 3–5 (NCI-CTC vs3.0) fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity and 104 matched controls (no-toxicity). The functional impact of rare variants was assessed using two different in silico predictive tools (i.e., Predict2SNP and ADME Prediction Framework) and structural modeling. Plasma concentrations of uracil (U) and dihydrouracil (UH2) were quantified in carriers of the novel variants.Here, we demonstrate that the burden of rare variants was significantly higher in patients with toxicity compared to controls (p = 0.007, Mann-Whitney test). Carriers of at least one rare missense DPYD variant had a 16-fold increased risk in the first cycle and an 11-fold increased risk during the entire course of chemotherapy of developing a severe adverse event compared to controls (p = 0.013 and p = 0.0250, respectively by multinomial regression model). Quantification of plasmatic U/UH2 metabolites and in silico visualization of the encoded protein were consistent with the predicted functional effect for the novel variations.Analysis and consideration of rare variants by DPYD-sequencing could improve prevention of severe toxicity of fluoropyrimidines and improve patients’ quality of life.

Clinical Implementation of DPYD Pharmacogenetic Testing to Prevent Early-Onset Fluoropyrimidine-Related Toxicity in Cancer Patients in Switzerland.

The implementation of pharmacogenetic testing into clinical practice has been a slow process so far. Here, we review the implementation of pre-treatment testing of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase gene (DPYD) risk variants to prevent early-onset fluoropyrimidine (FP)-related toxicity in cancer patients in Switzerland based on data of a large Swiss diagnostic center. In January 2017, the Swiss Federal Office of Public Health introduced the reimbursement of DPYD testing by the compulsory health insurance in Switzerland based on evidence for the clinical relevance of DPYD-risk variants and the cost-effectiveness of pre-treatment testing, and on the availability of international guidelines. However, we did not observe a strong increase in DPYD testing at our diagnostic center from 2017 to 2019. Only a low number of DPYD-testing requests (28–42 per year), concerning mostly retrospective investigations of suspected FP-toxicity, were received. In contrast, we observed a 14-fold increase in DPYD testing together with a strong shift from retrospective to pre-treatment test requests upon the release of recommendations for DPYD testing prior to FP-treatment in April 2020 by the European Medicines Agency. This increase was mainly driven by three geographic regions of Switzerland, where partner institutions of previous research collaborations regarding FP-related toxicity are located and who acted as early-adopting institutions of DPYD testing. Our data suggest the important role of early adopters as accelerators of clinical implementation of pharmacogenetic testing by introducing these policies to their working environment and educating health workers from their own and nearby institutions.

Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase Phenotyping Using Pretreatment Uracil: A Note of Caution Based on a Large Prospective Clinical Study.

In clinical practice, 25–30% of the patients treated with fluoropyrimidines experience severe fluoropyrimidine‐related toxicity. Extensively clinically validated DPYD genotyping tests are available to identify patients at risk of severe toxicity due to decreased activity of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD), the rate limiting enzyme in fluoropyrimidine metabolism. In April 2020, the European Medicines Agency recommended that, as an alternative for DPYD genotype‐based testing for DPD deficiency, also phenotype testing based on pretreatment plasma uracil levels is a suitable method to identify patients with DPD deficiency. Although the evidence for genotype‐directed dosing of fluoropyrimidines is substantial, the level of evidence supporting plasma uracil levels to predict DPD activity in clinical practice is limited. Notwithstanding this, uracil‐based phenotyping is now used in clinical practice in various countries in Europe. We aimed to determine the value of pretreatment uracil levels in predicting DPD deficiency and severe treatment‐related toxicity. To this end, we determined pretreatment uracil levels in 955 patients with cancer, and assessed the correlation with DPD activity in peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMCs) and fluoropyrimidine‐related severe toxicity. We identified substantial issues concerning the use of pretreatment uracil in clinical practice, including large between‐center study differences in measured pretreatment uracil levels, most likely as a result of pre‐analytical factors. Importantly, we were not able to correlate pretreatment uracil levels with DPD activity nor were uracil levels predictive of severe treatment‐related toxicity. We urge that robust clinical validation should first be performed before pretreatment plasma uracil levels are used in clinical practice as part of a dosing strategy for fluoropyrimidines.

Potential added value of combined DPYD/DPD genotyping and phenotyping to prevent severe toxicity in patients with a DPYD variant and decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity.

To investigate if dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase phenotyping has added value when combined with DPYD genotyping in predicting fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. Retrospective cohort study in which treatment and toxicity data were collected of 228 patients genotyped for four DPYD variants and phenotyped using an ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cell assay. Severe toxicity occurred in 25% of patients with a variant and normal dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, in 21% of patients without a variant and with decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity, and in 29% of patients without a variant and with normal dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity (controls). The majority of patients with a variant or a decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity received an initial dose reduction (68% and 53% vs 19% in controls) and had a lower mean dose intensity (75% and 81% vs 91% in controls). Fifty percent of patients with a variant and decreased enzyme activity experienced severe toxicity, despite the lowest initial dose and whole treatment dose intensity. They also experienced more grade 4/5 toxicities. Our results indicate that a combined genotype-phenotype approach could be useful to identify patients at increased risk for fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity (e.g. patients with a variant and decreased dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase activity). Because the group sizes are too small to demonstrate statistically significant differences, this warrants further research in a prospective study in a larger cohort.

Role of microRNAs in fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity: what we know.

Although more than half a century has passed since the discovery of fluoropyrimidines, they are still used in the treatment of many types of cancer, and it is estimated that annually two million patients undergo fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. The toxicity resulting from the use of fluoropyrimidines affects about 30-40% of patients, which in some cases may prove to be lethal. The key player in fluoropyrimidine toxicity is DPD activity, and patients with deficits are more likely to develop significant adverse events. In addition to genotyping DPYD variants associated with DPD deficiency, overexpression of miR-27 has also been shown to be a predictive factor for fluoropyrimidine toxicity. This review aims to relate what we know so far about the involvement of miRNA in fluoropyrimidine toxicity and to open new perspectives in this field.

Individualized Dosing of Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy to Prevent Severe Fluoropyrimidine-Related Toxicity: What Are the Options?

Fluoropyrimidines are widely used in the treatment of several types of solid tumors. Although most often well tolerated, severe toxicity is encountered in ~ 20–30% of the patients. Individualized dosing for these patients can reduce the incidence of severe fluoropyrimidine‐related toxicity. However, no consensus has been achieved on which dosing strategy is preferred. The most established strategy for individualized dosing of fluoropyrimidines is upfront genotyping of the DPYD gene. Prospective research has shown that DPYD‐guided dose‐individualization significantly reduces the incidence of severe toxicity and can be easily applied in routine daily practice. Furthermore, the measurement of the dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) enzyme activity has shown to accurately detect patients with a DPD deficiency. Yet, because this assay is time‐consuming and expensive, it is not widely implemented in routine clinical care. Other methods include the measurement of pretreatment endogenous serum uracil concentrations, the uracil/dihydrouracil‐ratio, and the 5‐fluorouracil (5‐FU) degradation rate. These methods have shown mixed results. Next to these methods to detect DPD deficiency, pharmacokinetically guided follow‐up of 5‐FU could potentially be used as an addition to dosing strategies to further improve the safety of fluoropyrimidines. Furthermore, baseline characteristics, such as sex, age, body composition, and renal function have shown to have a relationship with the development of severe toxicity. Therefore, these baseline characteristics should be considered as a dose‐individualization strategy. We present an overview of the current dose‐individualization strategies and provide perspectives for a future multiparametric approach.

300MO Impact of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in Asian population

300MO Impact of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPD) genotype on fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in Asian population

Upfront DPYD genotyping and toxicity associated with fluoropyrimidine-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy for oropharyngeal carcinomas.

6580 Background: The combination of carboplatin and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is effective when used concurrently with radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced oropharyngeal carcinomas (Calais et al. 1999). DPYD polymorphisms can be associated with an increased risk of severe toxicity to fluoropyrimidines (Deenen et al. 2016). Upfront screening for the DPYD*2A allele is available in the province of Québec, Canada since March 2017. This study aimed to determine the effect of upfront genotyping on grade ≥3 toxicities. Methods: The studied population included all consecutive cases of oropharyngeal carcinomas treated with 5-FU based chemoradiotherapy one year before and after the implementation of upfront DPYD*2A genotyping. All patients were treated at the Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal (CHUM) between March 2016 and April 2018. Clinical data were extracted from chart review. Extended screening for 3 supplemental at-risk DPYD variants was also retrospectively performed in August 2019. Results: 181 patients were included in the analysis (87 patients before and 94 patients after DPYD*2A screening implementation). 91% of patients (n = 86) were prospectively genotyped for the DPYD*2A allele. Of those screened, 2% (n = 2/87) demonstrated a heterozygous DPYD*2A mutation. Those two patients received cisplatin-based treatment and thus avoided 5-FU toxicities. Extended genotyping of DPYD*2A-negative patients later allowed for the retrospective identification of 6 additional patients with alternative DPYD variants (two c.2846A &gt; T and four c.1236G &gt; A allele mutations). Conclusions: The DPYD*2A, c.2846A &gt; T and c.1236G &gt; A polymorphisms are associated with an increased risk of G3-4 toxicity to 5-FU, as well as higher hospitalization rates. Upfront DPYD genotyping can identify patients in whom fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity should be avoided. This represents an interesting addition in terms of pharmacovigilance. [Table: see text]

Allele frequencies of two dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) risk variants, c.1905+1G&gt;A (*2A) and c.2846A&gt;T (D949V), in a direct-to-consumer genetic database.

2 Background: Pharmacogenetic (PGt) testing holds great potential for supporting clinical decision making and optimizing medication outcomes for cancer patients. Genetic variants in the DPYD gene are associated with reduced dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase enzyme activity, and can cause severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity. However, the clinical uptake of PGt testing has been slow. Recent FDA authorization for a direct-to-consumer (DTC) PGt test will improve access to PGt testing. This study assessed the frequency of two DPYD variants, c.1905+1G &gt; A (*2A) and c.2846A &gt; T (D949V), in a generally unselected group of genotyped individuals who have used DTC genetic testing (23andMe, Inc. Sunnyvale, CA). Methods: Study participants were genotyped using Illumina genotyping arrays that included the DPYD c.1905+1G &gt; A and c.2846A &gt; T variants. Eligible subjects were 23andMe U.S. customers who were at least 18 years of age and consented to participate in research. IRB approval was obtained from Ethical &amp; Independent Review Services. Results: Out of approximately 6.4 million eligible participants included in this analysis, the overall allele frequencies of DPYD c.1905+1G &gt; A and c.2846A &gt; T were 0.42% and 0.47%, respectively. People of Ashkenazi Jewish, South Asian, and European descent had the highest frequencies (0.56%, 0.56%, and 0.47%, respectively) for the DPYD c.1905+1G &gt; A variant, and people of European and Hispanic/Latino descent had the highest frequencies (0.55% and 0.43%, respectively) for the DPYD c.2846A &gt; T variant. Conclusions: This is the first description of an unselected cohort of individuals with DPYD c.1905+1G &gt; A and c.2846A &gt; T variants identified through DTC genetic testing. Preemptive DTC PGt testing can help disseminate potentially clinically useful information to a large number of consumers.

Prospective cohort study of the impact of hospital-wide dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD) genotype testing for fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy on adverse events and hospital costs.

3028 Background: Fluoropyrimidines remain integral components of modern chemotherapy for solid tumors, and their toxicities can be reduced by pretreatment DPYD genotyping. Our main objective was to demonstrate the feasibility of implementing a hospital-wide pretreatment DPYD testing service based on the CPIC 2013 guideline on fluoropyrimidines and DPYD. Methods: We enrolled participants prior to planned fluoropyrimidine treatment as well as those who had experienced adverse events (AEs) after initiation of therapy, from December 1, 2013 to November 30, 2018. The patients tested pretreatment were analyzed as a prospective cohort to assess AEs within 90 days of fluoropyrimidine initiation and associated hospital cost. The primary outcome was the rate of severe global fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in the pretreatment cohort (grade≥3, CTCAE v.4.0.3). Results: Of 1362 patients genotyped for DPYD within the study period 1041 were enrolled pretreatment and included in the primary analysis. The median age was 65 years (19-90), 57% male, 51% 5-FU, and 49% capecitabine. Dose reductions were recommended for 21 DPYD variant carriers who were detected pretreatment. There was no significant difference in the primary outcome between DPYD variant (29%) and wild type (18%) patients (Fisher’s exact test p = 0.25). Costs associated with ER visits and hospitalizations at our tertiary care centre were $1,268 (89-8,562) (Median (IQR)) and $2,961 (341-13,567) for DPYD variant (n = 4) and wild-type (n = 99) patients respectively. Post-AE genotyping (n = 70) found five DPYD variant patients; all experienced grade≥3 toxicity, costs were $15,825 (10,962-25,310), and one poor metabolizer died due to complications. Targeted next generation exome sequencing of DPYD wild-type patients who experienced severe AEs identified five potentially deleterious genetic variants in ABC efflux transporters. Conclusions: Pretreatment DPYD genotype guided dosing of fluorouracil and capecitabine is feasible and benefits patients, health care providers, and hospitals. Our data supports adoption of pretreatment DPYD genotyping as a standard of care.

Screening patients for fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity risk.

3529 Background: Severe, sometimes fatal, toxicity can occur during the 1st or 2nd course of chemotherapy using fluoropyrimidines (FPs), and poses a serious public health problem. FPs carry a 3-5% risk of grade ≥ 3 early toxicities and 0.2% risk of death linked to Dihydropyrimidine Dehydrogenase (DPD) deficiency. Methods: Of 29,000 patients screened since July 2000, 472 were referred to us due to severe toxicity during 1st round 5-FU, or because pre-screening was done too late. Toxicity evaluation was performed according to the NCI scale of adverse reactions to cancer drugs (0=none, 5=death). Patients were previously 5-FU naïve, had different cancers, and received various protocols, eg. 5FU or Capecitabine; bolus±continuous or per os. The reliability of the following 4 pre-treatment screening tests to predict grade≥ 4 toxicity was assessed: 1) DPYD genotype mutation (*2A,*2B,*7, 13, HapB3) 2) Plasma uracil (U) level, 3) Plasma dihydrouracil/uracil ratio (UH2/U) 4) a multiparametric approach with genotyping, UH2/U ratio and key patient factors (age, sex, etc.). McNemar’s test with Bonferroni correction was used for statistical analysis. Results: Of the 472 referred patients, 169 had grade 4 or 5 toxicity, of which 41 died from toxicity. 98 had one or plus DPYD mutation: 42(42.9%)*2A; 43(43.9%)*2B; 3(3%)*7; 4(4%)*13; 8(8.16%) HapB3; 1 was homozygous *2A. Data below compare the 4 screening methods for predicting grade 4-5 toxicity. Conclusions: The multiparametric approach is statistically (p&lt;0.0001) the most efficient in terms of preventing grade 4 and 5 toxicity (death) due to 5-FU treatment. Around 290,000 patients are treated with 5-FU per year in the USA. Assuming a 0.2% mortality rate due to toxicity, around 580 lives could be saved per year using the multiparametric pre-treatment test. [Table: see text]

Effectiveness and safety of reduced-dose fluoropyrimidine therapy in patients carrying the DPYD*2A variant: A matched pair analysis.

Carriers of the genetic DPYD*2A variant, resulting in dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase deficiency, are at significantly increased risk of developing severe fluoropyrimidine-associated toxicity. Upfront DPYD*2A genotype-based dose reductions improve patient safety, but uncertainty exists whether this has a negative impact on treatment effectiveness. Therefore, our study investigated effectiveness and safety of DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing. A cohort of 40 prospectively identified heterozygous DPYD*2A carriers, treated with a ~50% reduced fluoropyrimidine dose, was identified. For effectiveness analysis, a matched pair-analysis was performed in which for each DPYD*2A carrier a matched DPYD*2A wild-type patient was identified. Overall survival and progression-free survival were compared between the matched groups. The frequency of severe (grade ≥ 3) treatment-related toxicity was compared to 1] a cohort of 1606 wild-type patients treated with full dose and 2] a cohort of historical controls derived from literature, i.e. 86 DPYD*2A variant carriers who received a full fluoropyrimidine dose. For 37 out of 40 DPYD*2A carriers, a matched control could be identified. Compared to matched controls, reduced doses did not negatively affect overall survival (median 27 months versus 24 months, p = 0.47) nor progression-free survival (median 14 months versus 10 months, p = 0.54). Risk of severe fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity in DPYD*2A carriers treated with reduced dose was 18%, comparable to wild-type patients (23%, p = 0.57) and significantly lower than the risk of 77% in DPYD*2A carriers treated with full dose (p < 0.001). Our study is the first to show that DPYD*2A genotype-guided dosing appears to have no negative effect on effectiveness of fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy, while resulting in significantly improved patient safety.

DPYD, TYMS and MTHFR Genes Polymorphism Frequencies in a Series of Turkish Colorectal Cancer Patients.

Fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy is extensively used for the treatment of solid cancers, including colorectal cancer. However, fluoropyrimidine-driven toxicities are a major problem in the management of the disease. The grade and type of the toxicities depend on demographic factors, but substantial inter-individual variation in fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity is partly explained by genetic factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of dihydropyrimidine dehydrogenase (DPYD), thymidylate synthase (TYMS), and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) polymorphisms in colorectal cancer patients. Eighty-five patients who were administered fluoropyrimidine-based treatment were included in the study. The DPYD, TYMS and MTHFR polymorphisms were scanned by a next generation Sequenom MassARRAY. Fluoropyrimidine toxicities were observed in 92% of all patients. The following polymorphisms were detected: DPYD 85T>C (29.4% heterozygote mutants, 7.1% homozygote mutants), DPYD IVS 14+1G>A (1.2% heterozygote mutants), TYMS 1494del TTAAAG (38.4% heterozygote mutants, 24.7% homozygote mutants), MTHFR 677C>T (43.5% heterozygote mutants, 9.4% homozygote mutants) and MTHFR 1298A>C (8.2% heterozygote mutants, 2.4% homozygote mutants). A statistically significant association was demonstrated between MTHFR 677C>T and fluoropyrimidine-related toxicity (p value = 0.007). Furthermore, MTHFR 1298A>C was associated with hematopoietic toxicity (p value = 0.008). MTHFR polymorphisms may be considered as related factors of fluoropyrimidine toxicity and may be useful as predictive biomarkers for the determination of the colorectal cancer patients who can receive the greatest benefit from fluoropyrimidine-based treatments.