Fluid-attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch Research Articles

Basilar artery occlusion treated with mechanical thrombectomy in extended time window using diffusion-weighted imaging/fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch - a case report

Introduction. There are individual case reports and case-series in the literature that have applied diffusion-weighted imaging/ fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch and intravenous thrombolytic therapy in the treatment of posterior circulation strokes. This case report demonstrates the use of diffusion-weighted imaging/fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch in the treatment of basilar artery occlusion with mechanical thrombectomy. Case Report. A 68-year-old male patient presented with a wake-up stroke and a National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score of 14. Computed tomography angiography showed an occlusion of the basilar artery. Diffusion-weighted imaging/fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch was established and mechanical thrombectomy was performed. Complete reperfusion was achieved. Mechanical thrombectomy was performed in the 16th hour from the onset of symptoms. After the intervention, the patient?s National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 9. The patient was discharged without any neurological symptoms and a score of 0 on the modified Rankin Scale. Conclusion. Diffusion- weighted imaging/fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch may be a useful criterion for the selection of patients with basilar artery occlusion and unknown-onset strokes who are to be treated with mechanical thrombectomy.

Implementation of a wake-up and unknown symptom onset stroke protocol

Background: Establishing a symptom onset timeline for stroke patients is one of the essential aspects of thrombolytic therapy. Implementing an MRI protocol can potentially increase the rate of thrombolytic therapy and expand treatment to patients who would otherwise be excluded.Objective: This project aimed to increase the rate of thrombolytic therapy by incorporating an additional layer of evaluation within the established acute stroke code process for patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) or unknown symptom onset stroke.Methods: Patients 18 years of age and older who presented as WUS eligible for thrombolytic therapy underwent acute MRI. Patients with a diffusion weighted image and fluid attenuated inversion recovery mismatch (DWI-FLAIR Mismatch) on MRI were treated with thrombolytic therapy.Results: Chi-square test of independence showed patients who underwent the MRI protocol (N = 35) had a higher proportion of alteplase (tissue plasminogen activator,tPA) treatment when compared to a similar sample (N = 44) from 2019 acute stoke logs; ꭓ2 (1, N = 79) = 8.16, p = .006. Six patients received thrombolytic. Safety showed no symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) or deaths.

Editors' Note: Cerebral Microbleeds and Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke: An Analysis of the WAKE-UP Randomized Clinical Trial

Dr. Schlemm et al. performed a prespecified analysis of the association of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) with the treatment effect of IV alteplase vs placebo in the randomized controlled WAKE-UP (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke) trial of patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of symptom onset and diffusion-weighted imaging–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch on MRI. Among 459 patients available for analysis, there was no evidence of reduced treatment effect of alteplase in the 98 (21.4%) patients who had at least 1 CMB on baseline imaging. However, CMBs were associated with a nonsignificant increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; 11.2% vs 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 0.99–5.43). In response, Drs. Meinel and Seiffge highlight the importance of distinguishing patients with CMBs from cerebral amyloid angiopathy or other cerebral small vessel disease—who have an increased risk of postthrombolysis ICH—from those with other causes of CMBs and other such lesions on susceptibility-weighted imaging, like those seen after valve implantation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or prolonged intensive care unit stay. They also recommend examining the interaction of CMBs and white matter hyperintensities to better elucidate the risk of postthrombolysis hemorrhage. Responding to these comments, the authors note that new CMBs in acute ischemic stroke patients after IV thrombolysis were associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications in prior literature, whereas new CMBs after cardiac surgery were not associated with bleeding risk, suggesting different risk profiles for patients with different causes of acute CMBs—a topic meriting further investigation in histopathology and observational studies. This exchange highlights the challenges of disentangling cause-specific bleeding risks associated with CMBs when examining ICH outcomes in patients undergoing thrombolysis. Dr. Schlemm et al. performed a prespecified analysis of the association of cerebral microbleeds (CMBs) with the treatment effect of IV alteplase vs placebo in the randomized controlled WAKE-UP (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke) trial of patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of symptom onset and diffusion-weighted imaging–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch on MRI. Among 459 patients available for analysis, there was no evidence of reduced treatment effect of alteplase in the 98 (21.4%) patients who had at least 1 CMB on baseline imaging. However, CMBs were associated with a nonsignificant increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (ICH; 11.2% vs 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio 2.32, 95% CI 0.99–5.43). In response, Drs. Meinel and Seiffge highlight the importance of distinguishing patients with CMBs from cerebral amyloid angiopathy or other cerebral small vessel disease—who have an increased risk of postthrombolysis ICH—from those with other causes of CMBs and other such lesions on susceptibility-weighted imaging, like those seen after valve implantation, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, or prolonged intensive care unit stay. They also recommend examining the interaction of CMBs and white matter hyperintensities to better elucidate the risk of postthrombolysis hemorrhage. Responding to these comments, the authors note that new CMBs in acute ischemic stroke patients after IV thrombolysis were associated with an increased risk of hemorrhagic complications in prior literature, whereas new CMBs after cardiac surgery were not associated with bleeding risk, suggesting different risk profiles for patients with different causes of acute CMBs—a topic meriting further investigation in histopathology and observational studies. This exchange highlights the challenges of disentangling cause-specific bleeding risks associated with CMBs when examining ICH outcomes in patients undergoing thrombolysis.

Stroke: What's Sleep Got to Do With It?

Ischemic strokes most often occur between 6 am and 12 am after awakening from sleep but up to 30% occur during sleep. Wake-up strokes (WUS) are new focal neurological deficit(s) persisting for ≥ 24 hours attributable to an ischemic event present on patient awakening. Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a major risk factor for WUS because it compounds the instability of the morning environment and increases the likelihood of cardiovascular events, including hypertension, atrial fibrillation, right-to-left shunts, and stroke. Circadian-driven alterations in structural, homeostatic, and serological factors also predispose to WUS. Also, WUS patients are often not considered candidates for time-dependent intravenous thrombolysis therapy because of an uncertain onset time. However, using the tissue clock (positive diffusion weighted imaging-negative fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch) dates the WUS as 3 to 4.5 hours old and permits consideration for intravenous thrombolysis and if needed mechanical thrombectomy. Given the high prevalence of moderate/severe OSA in stroke patients and its impact on stroke outcomes, screening with overnight pulse oximetry and home sleep apnea test is needed. Treating OSA poststroke remains challenging. Polysomnographic changes in sleep architecture following acute/subacute stroke may also impact upon stroke outcome.

Cerebral Microbleeds and Treatment Effect of Intravenous Thrombolysis in Acute Stroke: An Analysis of the WAKE-UP Randomized Clinical Trial.

Background and ObjectivesCerebral microbleeds (CMBs) are common in patients with acute ischemic stroke and are associated with increased risk of intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) after intravenous thrombolysis. Whether CMBs modify the treatment effect of thrombolysis is unknown.MethodsWe performed a prespecified analysis of the prospective randomized controlled multicenter Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke (WAKE-UP) trial including patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of symptom onset and diffusion-weighted imaging–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch on MRI receiving alteplase or placebo. Patients were screened and enrolled between September 2012 and June 2017 (with final follow-up in September 2017). Patients were randomized to treatment with IV thrombolysis with alteplase at 0.9 mg/kg body weight or placebo. CMB status (presence, number, and distribution) was assessed after study completion by 3 raters blinded to clinical information following a standardized protocol. Outcome measures were excellent functional outcome at 90 days, defined by modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score ≤1, and symptomatic ICH according to National Institutes of Neurological Disease and Stroke trial criteria 22 to 36 hours after treatment.ResultsOf 503 patients enrolled in the WAKE-UP trial, 459 (91.3%; 288 [63%] men) were available for analysis. Ninety-eight (21.4%) had at least 1 CMB on baseline imaging; 45 (9.8%) had exactly 1 CMB; 37 (8.1%) had 2 to 4 CMBs; and 16 (3.5%) had ≥5 CMBs. Presence of CMBs was associated with a nonsignificant increased risk of symptomatic ICH (11.2% vs 4.2%; adjusted odds ratio [OR] 2.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.99–5.43, p = 0.052) but had no effect on functional outcome at 90 days (mRS score ≤1: 45.8% vs 50.7%; adjusted OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.59–1.64, p = 0.955). Patients receiving alteplase had better functional outcome (mRS score ≤1: 54.6% vs 44.6%, adjusted OR 1.61, 95% CI 1.07–2.43, p = 0.022) without evidence of heterogeneity in relation to CMB presence (p of the interactive term = 0.546). Results were similar for subpopulations with strictly lobar (presumed cerebral amyloid angiopathy related) or not strictly lobar CMB distribution.DiscussionIn the randomized-controlled WAKE-UP trial, we saw no evidence of reduced treatment effect of alteplase in patients with acute ischemic stroke with ≥1 CMBs. Additional studies are needed to determine the treatment effect of alteplase and its benefit-harm ratio in patients with a larger number of CMBs.Trial Registration InformationClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT01525290; ClinicalTrialsRegister.EU identifier 2011-005906-32.Classification of EvidenceThis study provides Class II evidence that for patients with acute ischemic stroke with unknown time of onset and diffusion-weighted imaging–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch who received IV alteplase, CMBs are not significantly associated with functional outcome at 90 days.

Should Tenecteplase be Given in Clinical Practice for Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombolysis?

Should Tenecteplase be Given in Clinical Practice for Acute Ischemic Stroke Thrombolysis?

The Role of the T2-FLAIR Mismatch Sign as an Imaging Marker of IDH Status in a Mixed Population of Low- and High-Grade Gliomas.

Our study evaluated the role of the T2–fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch sign in detecting isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutations based on a mixed sample of 24 patients with low- and high- grade gliomas. The association between the two was realized using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analysis. There was a substantial agreement between the two raters for the detection of the T2–FLAIR mismatch sign (Cohen’s kappa coefficient was 0.647). The T2–FLAIR mismatch sign when co-registered with the degree of tumor homogeneity were significant predictors of the IDH status (OR 29.642; 95% CI 1.73–509.15, p = 0.019). The probability of being IDH mutant in the presence of T2–FLAIR mismatch sign was as high as 92.9% (95% CI 63–99%). The sensitivity and specificity of T2–FLAIR mismatch sign in the detection of the IDH mutation was 88.9% and 86.7%, respectively. The T2–FLAIR mismatch sign may be an easy to use and helpful tool in recognizing IDH mutant patients, particularly if formal IDH testing is not available. We suggest that the adoption of a protocol based on imaging and histological data for optimal glioma characterization could be very helpful.

Quantitative Signal Intensity in Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery and Treatment Effect in the WAKE-UP Trial.

Background and Purpose- Relative signal intensity of acute ischemic stroke lesions in fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (fluid-attenuated inversion recovery relative signal intensity [FLAIR-rSI]) magnetic resonance imaging is associated with time elapsed since stroke onset with higher intensities signifying longer time intervals. In the randomized controlled WAKE-UP trial (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke Trial), intravenous alteplase was effective in patients with unknown onset stroke selected by visual assessment of diffusion weighted imaging fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch, that is, in those with no marked fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity in the region of the acute diffusion weighted imaging lesion. In this post hoc analysis, we investigated whether quantitatively measured FLAIR-rSI modifies treatment effect of intravenous alteplase. Methods- FLAIR-rSI of stroke lesions was measured relative to signal intensity in a mirrored region in the contralesional hemisphere. The relationship between FLAIR-rSI and treatment effect on functional outcome assessed by the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) after 90 days was analyzed by binary logistic regression using different end points, that is, favorable outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 1, independent outcome defined as mRS score of 0 to 2, ordinal analysis of mRS scores (shift analysis). All models were adjusted for National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale at symptom onset and stroke lesion volume. Results- FLAIR-rSI was successfully quantified in stroke lesions in 433 patients (86% of 503 patients included in WAKE-UP). Mean FLAIR-rSI was 1.06 (SD, 0.09). Interaction of FLAIR-rSI and treatment effect was not significant for mRS score of 0 to 1 (P=0.169) and shift analysis (P=0.086) but reached significance for mRS score of 0 to 2 (P=0.004). We observed a smooth continuing trend of decreasing treatment effects in relation to clinical end points with increasing FLAIR-rSI. Conclusions- In patients in whom no marked parenchymal fluid-attenuated inversion recovery hyperintensity was detected by visual judgement in the WAKE-UP trial, higher FLAIR-rSI of diffusion weighted imaging lesions was associated with decreased treatment effects of intravenous thrombolysis. This parallels the known association of treatment effect and elapsing time of stroke onset.

Clinical characteristics of unknown symptom onset stroke patients with and without diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch.

Background Diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch was suggested to identify stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset likely to be within the time window for thrombolysis. Aims We aimed to study clinical characteristics associated with DWI-FLAIR mismatch in patients with unknown onset stroke. Methods We analyzed baseline MRI and clinical data from patients with acute ischemic stroke proven by DWI from WAKE-UP, an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-based thrombolysis in stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset. Clinical characteristics were compared between patients with and without DWI-FLAIR mismatch. Results Of 699 patients included, 418 (59.8%) presented with DWI-FLAIR mismatch. A shorter delay between last seen well and symptom recognition (p = 0.0063), a shorter delay between symptom recognition and arrival at hospital (p = 0.0025), and history of atrial fibrillation (p = 0.19) were predictors of DWI-FLAIR mismatch in multivariate analysis. All other characteristics were comparable between groups. Conclusions There are only minor differences in measured clinical characteristics between unknown symptom onset stroke patients with and without DWI-FLAIR mismatch. DWI-FLAIR mismatch as an indicator of stroke onset within 4.5 h shows no relevant association with commonly collected clinical characteristics of stroke patients. Clinical Trial Registration URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT01525290; URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu . Unique identifier: 2011-005906-32.

Stroke With Unknown Time of Symptom Onset: Baseline Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Data of the First Thousand Patients in WAKE-UP (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke: A Randomized, Doubleblind, Placebo-Controlled Trial).

We describe clinical and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) characteristics of stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset potentially eligible for thrombolysis from a large prospective cohort. We analyzed baseline data from WAKE-UP (Efficacy and Safety of MRI-Based Thrombolysis in Wake-Up Stroke: A Randomized, Doubleblind, Placebo-Controlled Trial), an investigator-initiated, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of MRI-based thrombolysis in stroke patients with unknown time of symptom onset. MRI judgment included assessment of the mismatch between visibility of the acute ischemic lesion on diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery. Of 1005 patients included, diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch was present in 479 patients (48.0%). Patients with daytime-unwitnessed stroke (n=138, 13.7%) had a shorter delay between symptom recognition and hospital arrival (1.5 versus 1.8 hours; P=0.002), a higher National Institutes of Stroke Scale score on admission (8 versus 6; P<0.001), and more often aphasia (72.5% versus 34.0%; P<0.001) when compared with stroke patients waking up from nighttime sleep. Frequency of diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery mismatch was comparable between both groups (43.7% versus 48.7%; P=0.30). Almost half of the patients with unknown time of symptom onset stroke otherwise eligible for thrombolysis had MRI findings making them likely to be within a time window for safe and effective thrombolysis. Patients with daytime onset unwitnessed stroke differ from wake-up stroke patients with regards to clinical characteristics but are comparable in terms of MRI characteristics of lesion age. URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01525290. URL: https://www.clinicaltrialsregister.eu. Unique identifier: 2011-005906-32.

Does b1000-b0 Mismatch Challenge Diffusion-Weighted Imaging-Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch in Stroke?

Our aim was to explore whether the mismatch in lesion visibility between b1000 and b0 images is an alternative to mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging as a surrogate marker of stroke age. We analyzed patients from the European multicenter I-KNOW database. Independent readers assessed the visibility of ischemic lesions of the anterior circulation on b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images. The signal-intensity ratio for b0 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging images was also measured from the segmented stroke lesion volume on b1000 images. This study included 112 patients (68 men; mean age, 67.4 years) with stroke onset within (n=85) or longer than (n=27) 4.5 hours. b1000-b0 mismatch identified patients within 4.5 hours of stroke onset with moderate sensitivity (72.9%; 95% confidence interval [CI], 63.5-82.4) and specificity (70.4%; 95% CI, 53.2-87.6), high positive predictive value (88.6%; 95% CI, 81.1-96.0), and low negative predictive value (45.2%; 95% CI, 30.2-60.3). Global comparison of b1000-b0 mismatch with diffusion-weighted imaging-fluid-attenuated inversion recovery imaging mismatch (considered the imaging gold standard) indicated high sensitivity (85.9%; 95% CI, 78.2-93.6), specificity (91.2%; 95% CI, 76.3-98.1), and positive predictive value (96.7%; 95% CI, 88.0-99.1) and moderate negative predictive value (73.8%; 95% CI, 60.5-87.1) of this new approach. b0 signal-intensity ratio (r=0.251; 95% CI, 0.069-0.417; P=0.008) was significantly although weakly correlated with delay between stroke onset and magnetic resonance imaging. b1000-b0 mismatch may identify patients with ischemic stroke of the within 4.5 hours of onset with high positive predictive value, perhaps constituting an alternative imaging tissue clock.

Evaluation of Cerebral Perfusion in Patients Undergoing Intravenous Recombinant Tissue Plasminogen Activator Thrombolysis.

Currently, the indication for thrombolytic therapy using intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) is restricted strictly to patients with acute ischemic stroke within 4.5 h of onset. The effect of rt-PA declines over time; therefore, we need to minimize the time delay while generating imaging information. The use of cerebral blood flow imaging is not recommended within this time window. Conversely, the balance of efficacy and the risk of bleeding complications differ among patients > 4.5 h after onset. Several ongoing studies are using mismatch concepts to extend the therapeutic time window for rt-PA. Long-awaited reliable software, such as RAPID and PMA, are now available to analyze computed tomography/magnetic resonance perfusion data. Patients with wake-up stroke (WUS) are another group that can be used to expand rt-PA candidates. Diffusion fluid- attenuated inversion recovery mismatch is a promising imaging surrogate to select good candidates with WUS. These trials will cause a therapeutic paradigm shift from time-based to tissue-based strategies in the near future.

Color-coded fluid-attenuated inversion recovery images improve inter-rater reliability of fluid-attenuated inversion recovery signal changes within acute diffusion-weighted image lesions.

Diffusion-weighted image fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch has been considered to represent ischemic lesion age. However, the inter-rater agreement of diffusion-weighted image FLAIR mismatch is low. We hypothesized that color-coded images would increase its inter-rater agreement. Patients with ischemic stroke <24 hours of a clear onset were retrospectively studied. FLAIR signal change was rated as negative, subtle, or obvious on conventional and color-coded FLAIR images based on visual inspection. Inter-rater agreement was evaluated using κ and percent agreement. The predictive value of diffusion-weighted image FLAIR mismatch for identification of patients <4.5 hours of symptom onset was evaluated. One hundred and thirteen patients were enrolled. The inter-rater agreement of FLAIR signal change improved from 69.9% (k=0.538) with conventional images to 85.8% (k=0.754) with color-coded images (P=0.004). Discrepantly rated patients on conventional, but not on color-coded images, had a higher prevalence of cardioembolic stroke (P=0.02) and cortical infarction (P=0.04). The positive predictive value for patients <4.5 hours of onset was 85.3% and 71.9% with conventional and 95.7% and 82.1% with color-coded images, by each rater. Color-coded FLAIR images increased the inter-rater agreement of diffusion-weighted image FLAIR recovery mismatch and may ultimately help identify unknown-onset stroke patients appropriate for thrombolysis.

Visual and Region of Interest–Based Inter-Rater Agreement in the Assessment of the Diffusion-Weighted Imaging– Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch

WAKE-UP is a randomized, placebo-controlled MRI-based trial of thrombolysis in wake-up stroke using the mismatch between a lesion's visibility in diffusion-weighted imaging and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) sequences as its main imaging inclusion criterion. Visual judgment of lesion conspicuity on FLAIR is however methodically limited by moderate inter-rater agreement. We therefore sought to improve rating homogeneity by incorporating quantitative signal intensity measurements. One hundred forty-three data sets of patients with acute ischemic stroke were visually rated by 8 raters with respect to WAKE-UP study inclusion and exclusion criteria, and inter-rater agreement was calculated. A subanalysis was performed on 45 cases to determine a threshold value of relative signal intensity (rSI) between the ischemic lesion and contralateral healthy tissue which best corresponded to a visually established verdict of FLAIR positivity. The usefulness of this threshold in improving inter-rater agreement was evaluated in an additional sample of 50 patients. Inter-rater agreement for inclusion into the WAKE-UP trial was 73% with a free-marginal κ of 0.46. A threshold of rSI which best correlated with the visual rating of lesions as FLAIR positive was 1.20. The addition of rSI measurements to visual evaluation did not change the inter-rater agreement. Introducing a semiquantitative measure for FLAIR rSI did not improve the agreement between individual raters. However, enhancing visual assessment with rSI measurements can provide reassurance to local investigators in cases of uncertainty.

Diffusion-weighted Imaging–Fluid Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch in Nocturnal Stroke Patients with Unknown Time of Onset

More than a quarter of patients with ischemic stroke (IS) are excluded from thrombolysis because of an unknown time of symptom onset. Recent evidence suggests that a mismatch between diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) and fluid attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) imaging could be used as a surrogate for the time of stroke onset. We compared used the DWI-FLAIR mismatch and the FLAIR/DWI ratio to estimate the time of onset in a group of patients with nocturnal strokes and unknown time of onset. We used a prospectively collected acute IS patient database with MRI as the initial imaging modality. Nineteen selected nocturnal stroke patients with unknown time of onset were compared with 22 patients who had an MRI scan within 6 hours from stroke onset (control A) and 19 patients who had an MRI scan between 6 and 12 hours (control B). DWI and FLAIR signal was rated as normal or abnormal. FLAIR/DWI ratio was calculated from independent DWI and FLAIR ischemic lesion volumes using semiautomatic software. The DWI-FLAIR mismatch was different among groups (unknown 43.7%; control A 63.6%; control B 10.5%; Fisher-Freeman-Halton test; P = .001). There were significant differences in FLAIR/DWI ratio among the 3 groups (unknown 0.05 ± 0.12; control A 0.17 ± 0.15; control B 0.04 ± 0.06; Kruskal-Wallis test; P < .0001). Post-hoc pairwise comparisons revealed that FLAIR/DWI ratio from the unknown group was significantly different from the control B group (P = .0045) but not different from the control A group. DWI volumes were not different among the 3 groups. A large proportion of patients with nocturnal IS and an unknown time of stroke initiation have a DWI-FLAIR mismatch, suggesting a recent onset of stroke.

Intravenous Thrombolysis Based on Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Fluid-Attenuated Inversion Recovery Mismatch in Acute Stroke Patients with Unknown Onset Time

Background and Purpose: Patients with unknown onset time would be able to receive intravenous thrombolysis when showing diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI)/fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) mismatch. Methods: Consecutive acute stroke patients with unknown onset time were prospectively enrolled. We defined patients as having unknown onset time when the last known normal time (LNT) was not consistent with the first found abnormal time (FAT). Only patients with anterior-circulation stroke and presence of arterial lesion were enrolled. Intravenous thrombolysis was conducted within 3 h from FAT if the patient showed DWI/FLAIR mismatch. Results: From June 2009 to May 2010, 10 patients [median age, 84 years (interquartile range, IQR, 64–90); National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, 14 (IQR, 9–19)] were enrolled. Subjects included 4 patients who developed stroke during sleep, 5 with disturbance of consciousness, and 1 with aphasia. Median interval between LNT and thrombolysis was 5.6 h (IQR, 4.5–9.8) and median interval between FAT and thrombolysis was 2.5 h (IQR, 2.1–2.8). Three patients had internal carotid artery occlusion, 5 had M1 occlusion, and 2 had M2 occlusion. Early recanalization within 24 h was seen in 7 patients (complete recanalization, n = 4; partial recanalization, n = 3). No patients experienced symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage within 48 h. At day 7, 5 patients showed dramatic recovery (defined as ≧10-point reduction in total NIHSS score or score of 0 or 1). At 3 months, favorable outcome (modified Rankin scale score, 0–2) was seen in 4 patients. Conclusion: Acute stroke patients with DWI/FLAIR mismatch may be able to safely receive intravenous thrombolysis.