Sugarcane (Saccharum spp. hybrids) is a major row crop in Florida. The effect of row-spacing on total row length per hectare can significantly effect the cost of major farm operations, including planting, harvesting and fertilizer application. In Florida, sugarcane is commonly planted at 1.5 m row-spacing. There is little information available on the effect of relatively narrow or wide spacing on the growth and yield of sugarcane, especially in new high-biomass cultivars. To determine sugarcane growth response to different row-spacing, a field trial was conducted in organic soil (Histosols) with four different row-spacings (1.2, 1.5, 1.8 m and a double row on a 1.5 m bed) and three sugarcane cultivars (CP 96-1252, CP 00-1101 and CP 01-1372). Data showed differential row-spacing effects on plant cane versus the first ratoon. In plant cane, depending on the cultivar, double row and 1.2 m spacing produced 17–46% and 23–42% greater sugar yield per hectare (TSH) than the current 1.5 m spacing, respectively. Overall, the combined average TSH of plant cane and the first ratoon in double and 1.2 m spacing was 20% and 26% greater than 1.5 m spacing. However, the yields in 1.5 m and 1.8 m row-spacing were similar. There was no significant effect in the first ratoon. There was no row-spacing effect on sucrose concentration. A similar response of cultivars to the tested row-spacings suggests that selecting cultivars for different row-spacings may not potentially show any yield improvements. Compared to the current 1.5 m spacing, narrow-spacing (1.2 m and double row) may potentially increase yields and wide (1.8 m) spacing reduce the production cost but further research is needed to understand the economic feasibility of different row configurations.
Read full abstract