Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Research Articles

Percutaneous nephrolithotomy or flexible ureteral lithotripsy, which one is better for patients with upper ureteral calculi of 1.5–2.0 cm in diameter

PurposeFirst research to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of flexible ureteral lithotripsy (FURSL) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in the treatment of the upper ureteral stone is between 1.5 cm and 2.0 cm in diameter since there is no consensus with such ureteral stone yet.MethodsFrom December 2018 to October 2022, 104 patients with calculi in the upper ureter received percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)or flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL) in our institution. The clinical data of the patients in the two groups were retrospectively searched. Stone removal rate, operation time, blood loss, postoperative pain score, postoperative inflammatory factor, postoperative complication rates and ureteral obstruction three months after the operation were compared between the two groups.ResultsA total of 104 patients were included in the study. The stone clearance rate and the secondary surgery rate were 88.89% and 7.41% in the FURSL group, the figures were 97.96% and 2.0% in the PCNL group (p = 0.067, 0.497). Regarding ureteral obstruction three months after the operation, there were 2 patients in FURSL group and 0 patients in PCNL group(p = 0.497).Compared to patients in FURSL group, patients in the PCNL group had shorter operation time(PCNL 71.81 ± 18.94 min vs. FURSL 86.80 ± 22.49 min, p = 0.0004), fewer complications(PCNL 20.37% vs. FURSL 6.12%), and lower postoperative inflammatory factor(p = 0.0004), yet they got more hemoglobin drop (PCNL 13.14 ± 9.81 g/L vs. FURSL 4.77 ± 3.55 g/L, p < 0.0001), higher postoperative pain scores(p = 0.0017) in the first three postoperative days and longer hospital stay (PCNL 4.96 ± 1.21 days vs. FURSL 3.60 ± 0.83 days).ConclusionBoth FURSL and PCNL were effective methods for treating upper ureteral stones of 1.5–2.0 cm in diameter given the extremely high stone clearance rate and a very low secondary surgery rate, as long as rare ureteral obstruction in medium-long term observation. Additionally, FURSL can effectively reduce surgical bleeding, postoperative pain, and hospital stay, while PCNL can decrease operation time, the risk of infection, and complications. Therefore, doctors could select suitable surgical treatment for those patients depending on their different clinical situations based on these findings.

Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Kidney Stones and Their Impact on Inflammatory Response and Renal Function.

Kidney stones are one of the most common benign diseases in urology. As technology updates and iterates, more minimally invasive and laparoscopic surgeries with higher safety performance appear. This paper explores the effectiveness of retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) and percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in treating kidney stones, focusing on their effects on inflammatory responses and renal function. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 200 patients with kidney stones treated in our hospital between June 2019 and June 2023. 100 patients who underwent RIRS were included in the RIRS group. Another 100 patients who underwent PCNL treatment were included in the PCNL group. The intraoperative blood loss, operation duration, and hospitalization time of the two groups of patients were recorded and compared. The enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to detect the levels of inflammatory factors in the serum of the two groups of patients: [serum amyloid A (SAA), interleukin-6 (IL-6) and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP)] and renal function index [blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine (Scr) and serum cystatin (Cys-c)]. The two groups of patients were recorded separately: Postoperative complications and stone-free rate. Operation duration was longer for the RIRS group than the PCNL group, which exhibited significantly less intraoperative blood loss and shorter hospital stays (p < 0.05). Before surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the serum levels of SAA, IL-6, and CRP between the two groups of patients (p > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the serum SAA levels in both groups were lower than before surgery, IL-6 and CRP levels were higher than before surgery, and the serum levels of SAA, IL-6, and CRP in the RIRS group were significantly lower than those in the PCNL group. The difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Before surgery, there was no statistically significant difference in the serum BUN, Scr, and Cys-c levels between the two groups of patients (p > 0.05). On the first day after surgery, the serum BUN, Scr, and Cys-c levels of the two groups of patients were significantly higher than those before surgery. The serum BUN, Scr, and Cys-c levels of the RIRS group were significantly lower than those of the PCNL group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). Both surgical methods have sound stone-clearing effects regarding long-term stone clearance rates 1 month and 3 months after surgery (p > 0.05). PCNL had a better stone clearance rate on the 2nd postoperative day (p < 0.05). The incidence of postoperative complications in the RIRS group was significantly lower than that in the PCNL group, and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.05). For kidney stones ≤2 cm, PCNL showed higher stone clearance rates on the second postoperative day. However, RIRS and PCNL demonstrated adequate long-term stone clearance at 1 and 3 months post-surgery. Both surgical methods are safe and effective, and RIRS is safer than PCNL. Compared with PCNL, RIRS is a new method of kidney stone operation, which has less trauma to the patient's body and fewer complications after the operation, speeding up the recovery process of the patient.

Actively extracting kidney stones combined dusting technique can improve SFR of moderate-complexity kidney stones in fURL.

To evaluate the necessity and effectiveness of actively extracting kidney stones with different complexity that have been visually dusted in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURL). We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent fURL with dusting technique in established hospitals. A total of 535 cases were divided into the dusting group or the dusting plus basketing group according to the use of stone basket. Their characteristics and operative parameters were collected and analyzed. We used the R.I.R.S. scoring system to classify the complexity of kidney stones and divided these kidney stones into three subgroups, namely, mild-, moderate-, and severe-complexity group. And then, the effectiveness of stone basket in these subgroups was analyzed. Although using a stone basket significantly reduced re-operation rate (17.8% in dusting group versus 10.2% in dusting plus basketing group, p = 0.013), no significant difference on stone-free rate (SFR) and overall incidence of complications were noticed between groups. After we classified the complexity of kidney stones using the R.I.R.S. scoring system, we found a stone basket was helpful to improve SFR in kidney stones with moderate-complexity that had been visually dusted in fURL (73.5% in dusting group versus 87.3% in dusting plus basketing group, p = 0.002) but had limited influence on SFR in mild (93.8% in dusting group versus 92.6% in dusting plus basketing group, p = 0.783) or severe (28.5% in dusting group versus 34.0% in dusting plus basketing group, p = 0.598)-complexity kidney stones. The use of stone basket should be encouraged in moderate-complexity kidney stones which can be visually dusted in fURL.

Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy Operative Time Prediction Model for the Treatment of Kidney Stones

Effective time and resource management is crucial not only in the operating room but also in healthcare supply chains. Healthcare supply chains involve the movement of medical supplies, equipment, and medications from manufacturers to healthcare providers. Effective management is crucial to ensuring that patients receive the care they need promptly. In the operating room, it is essential to have an information process in place to effectively manage time and resources during the current surgical procedure. This paper focuses on developing a predictive model for the operating time of flexible ureteroscopy for kidney stones. The model can forecast surgical and preoperative time based on patient characteristics and surgeon experience. The model can assist in planning ureteroscopy procedures and preventing surgical complications, which is crucial not only for the operating room but also for healthcare supply chains. The paper presents a study that compares different feature selection methods and regression techniques. The study found that sequential backward selection combined with the extra tree regressor was the most effective approach.

Factors affecting the intraoperative calculi excretion during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy: an in vitro analysis.

To explore the parameters influencing intraoperative calculi excretion (ICE) during flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL) using in vitro simulation experiments. 3D-printed human kidney models were used to simulate the elimination of gravel during fURL. The factors influencing the ICE during fURL were analyzed by comparing the effects of different degrees of hydronephrosis (mild, moderate, and severe), surgical positions (supine and lateral position), ratios of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD) (0.625, 0.725, and 0.825), gravel sizes (0.50-1.00mm, 0.25-0.50mm, and 0.10-0.25mm), and ureteral access sheaths (UASs) (traditional UAS and negative-pressure UAS) on ICE. The impacts of various UAS, RESD, degree of hydronephrosis, surgical positions, and gravel sizes on ICE were all significant (p < 0.05). We found no evidence of multicollinearity for all the independent variables, and the linear regression equation fitted as (R2 = 0.569). Employing negative-pressure UAS, smaller RESD, milder hydronephrosis, lateral position, and smaller gravel size contribute to improved ICE during fURL. Among them, the adoption of negative-pressure UAS had the most substantial effects.

The optimal ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter with negative-pressure ureteral access sheath: an in vitro research.

To maintain safe intrarenal pelvic pressure (IPP), the combination of flexible ureteroscope (fURS) and traditional ureteral access sheath (T-UAS) should maintain a basic rule that is the ratio of endoscope-sheath diameter (RESD) ≤ 0.75. However, the negative-pressure ureteral access sheath (NP-UAS) may break the rule of negative pressure suction. This study aimed to examine the effect of NP-UAS on IPP and flow rate (FR) with varying RESD. In a 3D-printed renal model, flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL) was replicated. Six sizes of fURS paired with 12Fr T-UAS and NP-UAS resulted in six distinct RESDs of 0.63, 0.78, 0.87, 0.89, 0.90, and 0.91. While the irrigation pressure (IRP) was set between 100 and 800 cmH2O and the sucking pressure (SP) was set between 0 and 800 cmH2O, the IPP and FR were measured in each RESD. NP-UASs can reduce the IPP and increase the FR at the same RESD compared to T-UASs. The IPP decreased with increasing SP with NP-UAS. When RESD ≤ 0.78, T-UAS and NP-UAS can maintain IPP < 40 cmH2O in most circumstances. When RESD = 0.87, it is challenging for T-UAS to sustain IPP < 40 cmH2O; however, NP-UAS can do so. When RESD ≥ 0.89, it is difficult to maintain an IPP < 40 cmH2O even with NP-UAS. NP-UAS can decrease IPP and increase FR compared with T-UAS. To maintain a safe IPP, it is recommended that RESD < 0.85 when utilizing NP-UAS.

Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on Post-Operative Infection in Patients Undergoing Flexible Ureteroscopy Lithotripsy.

Background: To investigate retrospectively whether metabolic syndrome (MetS) of flexible ureteroscopy (fURS) lithotripsy can be used to predict post-operative infection. Patients and Methods: After screening, 1,110 patients who received fURS lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in our center between January 2015 and December 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. Patients were divided into MetS-positive group and MetS-negative group. Post-operative infection was divided into fever, urosepsis, and septic shock. Relevant data during the peri-operative period were collected. Univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses were adopted to estimate the impact of metabolic syndrome on post-operative infection in patients undergoing fURS lithotripsy. Results: Among the 1,110 patients, 427 tested positive for MetS, whereas 683 tested negative. Eighty-eight patients suffered from fever (67 patients in the MetS-positive group and 21 in the MetS-negative group). Forty-nine patients had urosepsis (29 patients in the MetS-positive group and 20 in the MetS-negative group), of whom seven patients developed septic shock. No patient developed multiple organ failure or died because of infection. The prevalence of post-operative infections in the MetS-positive group was higher than that in the MetS-negative group (p < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analyses showed that diabetes mellitus, MetS-positive, positive urine culture, and longer operation time were positively correlated with post-operative fever. Positive MetS, positive urine culture, and longer operation time were strongly correlated with post-operative urosepsis. Conclusions: Metabolic syndrome was found to be associated with post-operative infection in patients undergoing fURS lithotripsy, suggesting it can serve as a predictive factor.

A Comparative Analysis between Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Tubeless Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of >15 mm Non-Obstructing Proximal Ureteral Stones.

The proper surgical modality for large non-obstructing proximal ureteral stones is disputed. We compare effectiveness and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and tubeless percutaneous nephrolithotomy (TPNL) in treatment of upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. We reviewed the medical records of patients who performed FURL or TPNL for upper ureteral stones between June 2016 and November 2018. Comparative analysis was conducted regarding demographic parameters, stone free rate, postoperative pain and complications. This study included 58 patients treated with FURL and 60 patients treated with TPNL owing to upper ureteral stones larger than 1.5 cm. Stone size was similar in the FURL and TPNL groups (17.6 ± 2.6 vs. 18.0 ± 2.1 mm, p = 0.194). The overall 3-month stone clearance rate was 95.8% for FURL versus 96.0% for TPNL (p = 0.575). There was no difference between the FURL and TPNL groups for hospital stay (p = 0.280) and postoperative complications. On the other hand, patients treated with FURL had longer operative time (p = 0.012) and less postoperative pain (p = 0.008). Both surgical techniques were considered feasible and effective surgical procedures in the treatment of large upper ureteral stones.

A comparative study of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy for upper urinary tract stones in patients with prior urosepsis following emergency drainage via retrograde ureteral stent or percutaneous nephrostomy

BackgroundPatients with urosepsis associated with upper urinary tract stones require further stone management after emergency drainage.ObjectiveTo evaluate the safety and efficacy of elective flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (F-URSL) for upper urinary tract stones in patients with prior urosepsis who have undergone emergency drainage using retrograde ureteral stent(RUS) or percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN).MethodBetween January 2017 and December 2021, clinical data were collected for 102 patients who underwent elective F-URSL following emergency drainage for urosepsis caused by upper ureteral or renal stones. The patients were categorized into two groups based on the drainage method used: the RUS group and the PCN group. The collected data included patient demographics, stone parameters, infection recovery after emergency drainage, and clinical outcomes post F-URSL. Subsequently, the data underwent statistical analysis.ResultsA total of 102 patients were included in the statistical analysis, with 58 (56.86%) in the RUS group and 44 (43.14%) in the PCN group. Among the patients, 84 (82.35%) were female and 18 (17.65%) were male, with an average age of 59.36 years. Positive urine cultures were observed in 71 (69.61%) patients. Successful drainage was achieved in all patients in both groups, and there were no significant differences in the time required for normalization of white blood cell count (WBC) and body temperature following drainage. Additionally, all patients underwent F-URSL successfully, and no statistically significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of operative time, stone-free rates, postoperative fever, and postoperative hospital stay.ConclusionBoth RUS and PCN have been established as effective approaches for managing urosepsis caused by upper urinary tract stones. Furthermore, the impact of these two drainage methods on the subsequent management of stones through elective F-URSL has shown consistent outcomes.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopy and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 2-3 cm renal calculi in women: a single-center study.

This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL) and mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy (mPCNL) in the treatment of 2-3 cm renal calculi in women. Clinical data of 186 patients who underwent mPCNL (n=96) and FURSL (n=90) surgery in our hospital from June 2018 to February 2023 were collected. Several parameters were assessed and compared between the two groups, including operation duration, length of hospital stay, cost of hospitalization, pain intensity measured by the visual analogue scale (VAS), patient comfort assessed using the Bruggrmann Comfort Scale (BCS), decrease in hemoglobin levels, changes in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), fluctuations in serum creatinine (Scr), hypersensitive C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) levels, complication rates, immediate post-operative stone-free rate (RSFR), and long-term stone-free rate (LSFR). The comparative analysis of patient age, body mass index (BMI), stone size, computed X-ray tomography (CT) value of stones, number of stones, and comorbidities revealed no statistically significant differences between the mPCNL and FURSL groups (p>0.05). The mPCNL cohort exhibited a markedly lower duration of operation (p<0.001) and BCS score (p<0.001) compared to the FURSL cohort. Nonetheless, the mPCNL cohort demonstrated significantly higher hospitalization expenses (p<0.001), length of hospital stay (p<0.001), VAS score for pain (p<0.001), and level of hemoglobin decrease (p<0.001) in comparison to the FURSL cohort. Moreover, the immediate post-operative stone-free rate (RSFR) was significantly higher in the mPCNL group (p=0.007). The long-term stone-free rate (LSFR), however, showed no significant difference between the two groups (p=0.160). Furthermore, the FURSL group exhibited significantly fewer overall complications in contrast to the mPCNL group (p=0.006). mPCNL and FURSL are both safe and effective surgical methods for treating 2-3 cm renal calculi in women. However, FURSL holds distinct advantages, including minimally invasive procedure, accelerated recovery, reduced cost, and lower incidence of complications.

Application of tip-bendable ureteral access sheath in flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy: an initial experience of 224 cases.

During the last decades, the advent of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy has revolutionized the management of upper urinary tract stones. We designed a patented tip-bendable ureteral access sheath to facilitate stone clearance. Our current study reported our initial experience of 224 cases. The study is a descriptive, retrospective analysis. The initial 224 cases, operated consecutively by one surgeon during 16 months, were reviewed. The novel tip-bendable ureteral access sheath was applied in the procedure. Demographics, laboratory tests, and peri- and postoperative findings (operation duration, stone-free rate (SFR), utilization of flexible instruments and complications) were analyzed. The median age of the patients was 56 years and the mean stones size was 2.3 ± 1.3cm. There were 63 cases of upper ureteral stone, 93cases of renal stone and 68 cases of ureteral-renal stones. The mean operative time was 69.2 ± 65.2min. The immediate stone-free rate was 76.8% and the 1 month post-operative stone-free rate was 97.3%. Most cases(95.5%)were success in single session. Two patient experienced post-operative fever. There was no unplanned readmission. The frequency of post-operative complications was estimated at 0.89% (Clavien I). Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with tip-bendable ureteral access sheath is a safe and effective procedure, which can achieve excellent stone clearance.

Comparative Analysis of Super-Mini Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Combined with Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy versus Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy Alone for Treating Complex Kidney Stones: A Retrospective Study of 205 Patients.

BACKGROUND This retrospective study aimed to compare outcomes from super-mini percutaneous nephrolithotomy (SMP) combined with flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) and FURL alone in 205 patients with 2.5-4.2 cm diameter complex kidney stones. MATERIAL AND METHODS Between January 2018 and December 2022, 92 patients were treated with SMP combined with FURL (group A), and 113 patients were treated with FURL alone (group B). The stone-free rate (SFR), retreatment ratio, operation time, mean decline in hemoglobin level, postoperative pain visual analogue scale (VAS), and postoperative hospitalization time and complications were analyzed and compared between the 2 groups. RESULTS The SFR 3 days after the operation was 85.87% in group A, which was significantly higher than that in group B (72.57%) (P=0.021). The rate of retreatment in group A (3.26%) was significantly lower than that in group B (10.62%) (P=0.044). The SFR after 90 days was higher in group A (94.57%) than in group B (90.27%) (P=0.254). The mean decrease in hemoglobin, postoperative hospitalization duration, and VAS score 6 hours after the operation were all significantly higher in group A than in group B (P<0.05). However, there was no significant difference in operation time, VAS score at 12 and 24 hours after the operation, and complication rate. CONCLUSIONS In the treatment of complex renal stones, compared with FURL, SMP combined with FURL in the oblique supine lithotomy position has the advantages of a higher early SFR with no increased risk of complications.

Retracted: Efficacy of Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy and Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Complex Upper Urinary Tract Nephrolithiasis.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/2378113.].

Mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy: Is smaller better for kidney stones in patients with neurogenic bladder?

IntroductionPatients with neurologic bladder are at an increased risk for urolithiasis, and currently, data on mini-percutaneous nephrolithotomy in this population are limited. Our objective was to compare mini (15F)-percutaneous nephrolithotomy, standard (24F)-PCNL and flexible ureteroscopy in terms of efficacy and safety in treatment of kidney stones in patients with neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction (NLUTD). MethodsWe conducted a retrospective monocentric study in our neuro-urological referral centre. All consecutive patients with NLUTD and a cumulative size of renal calculi greater than 15mm or 10mm in the lower calyx, who had extraction surgery between 2005 and 2020, were included. The primary endpoint was the one-session stone-free rate (SFR) at 3 months on a CT scan. The secondary endpoints were complication (Clavien-Dindo grading system), operative time, blood loss and length of hospital stay. ResultsWe performed 76 standard PCNL (sPCNL), 46 flexible ureteroscopy lithotripsy (fURL) and 25 miniaturized PCNL (mPCNL). The one-session SFR was 37.5% for the mPCNL group, 38.2% for the sPCNL group and 37% for the fURL group with no significant difference between the three procedures (P=0.99). Early complications, blood loss and transfusion rates were lower in the mPCNL group than in the sPCNL group (P=0.047) and comparable to fURL group. The final SFRs after a second intervention for mPCNL, sPCNL and fURL were 48%, 61.8% and 63%, respectively (P=0.67). ConclusionThe efficacy of mPCNL in patients with NLUTD was not different from other techniques, but a significantly lower rate of complications than sPCNL was observed. Level of proof3.

Omnidirectional (Flexible) Ureteral Access Sheath: Safety, Efficacy, and Initial Experience Report.

Background: Recently a novel omnidirectional (OD) ureteral access sheath (UAS) has been developed. By retrospectively reviewing and comparing the flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) cases in our institution with either a conventional Cook UAS or an OD UAS in the past year, we shared our experience of the safety, efficacy, and relevant issues on the usage of OD UAS. Materials and Methods: The medical history and surgery details of 199 patients with kidney stones or ureterojunctional stones who underwent FURL in Xinhua Hospital, including 61 Cook UAS and 138 OD UAS, were reviewed and compared. The maximal deflection angle was measured by steering four different types of ureteroscopes to bend the OD UAS in different states. Result: The deflection angle of OD UAS was ∼110° to 130° free load, and 90° to 130° when loaded with different instruments. The stone burden and position were similar in two groups. Given a similar prestent ratio and operation time, the OD UAS group achieved a higher single-session stone-free rate (SFR) (63.9% vs 94.2%, p < 0.0001) at 1-month follow-up evaluated by a CT scan. Conclusion: OD UAS is a novel device with high safety and efficacy. The unique flexible design allows it to bend with the ureteroscope and enter renal calices and be set close to the stone. Combined with the suction port, OD UAS contributes greatly to dealing with large-burden kidney stones, shortens operation time, and improves single-session SFR.

Vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy in the treatment of kidney and proximal ureteral stones less than 3cm in size.

This study aimed to compare the outcomes of vacuum-assisted dedusting lithotripsy (VADL) using flexible vacuum-assisted ureteral access sheath (FV-UAS) versus traditional flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURL) in patients with kidney or proximal ureteral calculi less than 3cm in size. A total of 371 patients who successfully underwent fURL treatment were enrolled. These patients were divided into traditional fURL group and VADL group. Outcomes of both groups were compared using 1:1 propensity score-matched analysis. Stratified analyses based on stone size and location were also conducted. Finally, 103 well-matched patients in each group were identified. No septic shock or death occurred. The immediate stone-free rate (SFR) and follow-up SFR of VADL group were significantly higher (78.6% vs. 50.5%, p < 0.001; 94.2%% vs. 75.7%, p < 0.001). No difference was observed in postoperative fever rate (2.9% vs. 3.9%, p = 1.000) and duration of lithotripsy (37.7 ± 20.1min vs. 40.3 ± 18.9min, p = 0.235). For patients with stones ≤ 2cm in size, the immediate SFR and follow-up SFR in VADL group were higher (86.7% vs. 60.6%, p < 0.001; 96.0% vs. 83.1%, p = 0.010). The same trend was observed in the 2-3cm subgroup (57.1% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.023; 89.3% vs. 59.4%, p = 0.009). Although the in situ fragmentation strategy was employed more frequently in VADL group for lower pole stones, the SFR was still higher. Subgroup analyses did not reveal any significant differences in either infectious complications or duration of lithotripsy. VADL technique can significantly improve the postoperative SFR for the patients with kidney or proximal ureteral stones less than 3cm in size treated by flexible ureteroscope.

Retrospective study of single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy versus miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy for 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones.

Retrospective analysis was performed on the clinical information of patients with 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones treated by single-use digital flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (fURS) and miniaturized percutaneous nephrolithotomy (MPCNL) in affiliated hospital of the Nantong University from January 2020 to December 2022. To compare the safety and efficacy of single-use fURS and MPCNL in the treatment from 1.5cm to 2.5cm lower pole renal stones. Clinical information of 141 patients were collected and divided into single-use fURS group and MPCNL group according to their treatment methods, including 83 patients in the single-use fURS group and 58 patients in the MPCNL group. Baseline data, data on the clinical characteristics of stones, laboratory examination data, operation time, and postoperative data of the two groups were collected. Statistical analysis was made on the collected data to analyze the differences and causes between the two groups of patients. There was no significant difference in the baseline data and preoperative clinical features of 141 patients between the two groups (P > 0.05). In comparison of postoperative serum indexes, the drop values of hemoglobin and creatinine in single-use fURS group were lower than those in MPCNL group, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.05). The stone free rate was higher in the MPCNL group than in the single-use fURS group on the first day after surgery. At the 1st month after surgery, the two groups were similar. At 3rd month after surgery, the single-use fURS group was slightly higher than the MPCNL group, with no statistical significance (P > 0.05). The total complication rate in single-use fURS group was slightly lower than that in MPCNL group, but there was no statistical significance (P > 0.05). Single-use fURS has similar safety and efficacy to MPCNL in the treatment of 1.5-2.5cm lower pole renal stones. Single-use fURS may be a new option for the treatment of these stones.

Flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy with a suctioning ureteral access sheath for removing upper urinary calculi under local anesthesia.

We aimed to probe the safety and effectiveness of flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURL) with a suctioning ureteral access sheath (S-UAS) for removing upper urinary calculi under local anesthesia (LA). The clinical data of 56 patients with upper urinary calculi treated by FURL with an S-UAS under LA during the period between September 2019 and November 2022 were analyzed retrospectively. For LA, intramuscular pethidine (1.0-2.0 mg/kg) and phenergan (25 mg) were administered 30 min prior to surgery, and oxybuprocaine hydrochloride gel was administered through the urethra at the start of the surgery. The S-UAS and flexible ureteroscope were used for FURL. Demographic characteristics, stone-related parameters, and clinical outcomes were analyzed. A total of 66 procedures were performed successfully on 46 patients (Group A), who underwent unilateral surgeries, and on 10 patients (Group B) who underwent same-session bilateral surgeries. All 56 patients were operated upon without altering the anesthesia strategy, and none required additional analgesia. The mean stone sizes of the Group A and Group B patients were 20.24 ± 5.45 mm and 29.40 ± 3.89 mm, respectively. The mean operative times of the two groups were 53.04 ± 13.35 min and 90.00 ± 15.81 min, respectively. In Group A, the stone-free rates (SFRs) were 76.1% (35/46) and 85.1% (40/46) at postoperative day 1 and day 30, respectively. In Group B, the SFRs were 80.0% (16/20) and 85.0% (17/20), respectively. Four (8.7%) patients in Group A suffered complications such as fever, stent pain, urosepsis, and steinstrasse. In Group B, one (10%) patient suffered from fever. FURL, combined with an S-UAS under LA, is a feasible option and provides satisfactory clinical outcomes for appropriately selected patients.

Case report: Crossed fused renal ectopia with stones: Asurgical challenge overcome by robotic surgery.

Crossed fused renal ectopia (CFRE) is an extremely rare congenital anomaly of the urinary tract that is prone to stone formation. The surgical treatment of CFRE with stones is challenging due to anatomical abnormalities. Right kidney stones were treated by flexible ureteroscopic lithotripsy (FURSL) and left kidney stones were treated by robotic surgery. The authors present an unreported case of bilateral renal stones in a patient with CFRE, which was successfully treated by robotic pyelolithotomy combined with FURSL. The procedure was manoeuverable, and the stone-free rate was satisfactory. CFRE with stones (S-shaped kidney) present a surgical challenge due to anatomical abnormalities and a high stone burden. The authors recommend robotic pyelolithotomy with or without FURSL as a viable treatment option for stones with similar anatomical abnormalities.

Retracted: Analysis of the Causes and Preventive Strategies of Urogenic Sepsis after Flexible Ureteroscopic Lithotripsy.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.1155/2022/5332101.].