Background: Minimally invasive and endoscopic techniques are increasingly being used by surgeons nowadays in the management of patients with cholelithiasis and choledocholithiasis. However, there is a high failure rate in the extraction of large impacted stones using the conventional flexible choledochoscope by the laparoscopic approach. Improvisation of this technique will reduce the failure rate. The present study explored the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of a semirigid ureteroscope (SRUS) in the laparoscopic management of common bile duct (CBD) stones. Methods: A prospective observational clinical study was carried out in an experienced GI surgical unit from January 2020 to December 2021. It included 36 patients diagnosed with radiologically proven gallstone disease with bile duct calculi who underwent Laparoscopic CBD exploration (LCBDE) and stone extraction using SRUS with lap cholecystectomy (LC) as a single-stage procedure. The success rate in terms of complete CBD clearance is the primary outcome measure. Post-procedure complications, 24 hr pain score, in-hospital stay, and patient satisfaction score are the secondary outcome measures. Results: Mean age of the study subjects was 50.45±9.12 years. The most common clinical symptom was biliary colic followed by jaundice. The primary outcome measure of complete CBD clearance was achieved in 94%. A complication following surgery was bile leak in one patient (3%). There were no surgical site infections or T-tube related complications. The average WHO 24-hour pain score was 4.9±1.9. The mean in-hospital stay was 3.3±1.4 and the mean patient satisfaction score was 2.42±0.3. Conclusion: Laparoscopic approach avoids the complications of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) sphincterotomy/sphinteroplasty and keeps the sphincter of Oddi (SOD) intact. LCBDE with SRUS is a safe and effective single-stage approach without any radiation hazards. The pneumatic lithotripter with its pneumatic ballistic effect is more efficacious, cost-effective, and safe as compared to other lithotripsy techniques. This lithotripter is capable of dealing with different varieties of stones regardless of their composition, size and degree of impaction. However, future comparative studies are needed to prove the superiority of this technique.
Read full abstract