Atopic Dermatitis Flares Research Articles

Investigation into the Effects of Allergen Exposure and Topical Vinegar and Water Spray on Skin Barrier Parameters in Atopic Dogs.

Increased skin pH and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) are documented in atopic people and dogs but no study has investigated how these parameters change during an allergy flare. Our primary aim was to challenge atopic beagles to dust mites and measure pH and TEWL during a flare of atopic dermatitis and correlate these parameters to clinical signs. A secondary aim was to evaluate in a randomized placebo-controlled study whether the daily application of 50/50 vinegar spray improves clinical signs and affects skin parameters despite the allergen challenge. Fifteen atopic dogs were challenged epicutaneously twice weekly for 2 weeks with allergen application on the inguinal and medial thigh areas. The severity of dermatitis was scored daily (CADESI-03). TEWL and pH were measured daily on the inguinal and medial thigh areas. A repeated measures ANOVA showed the significant effect of time, with increased pH (p < 0.0001), TEWL (p < 0.0001), and CADESI (p < 0.0001) during allergen challenge. Significant positive correlations were found between CADESI and pH (r = 0.3556; p < 0.0001), CADESI and TEWL (r = 0.36; p < 0.0001), and pH and TEWL (r = 0.45; p < 0.0001). Daily application of 50/50 vinegar did not improve dermatitis, pH, and TEWL compared to the control treatment. It can be concluded that both pH and TEWL are markers of disease severity in canine atopic dermatitis.

Consensus on a Patient-Centered Definition of Atopic Dermatitis Flare

Flare is a term commonly used in atopic dermatitis (AD) care settings and clinical research, but little consensus exists on what it means. Meanwhile, flare management is an important unmet research and treatment need. Understanding how various therapies might comparatively improve AD flares as a measure of treatment effectiveness may facilitate shared decision-making and enable assessment of effectiveness within and outside clinical settings. To identify patient-reported attributes associated with an AD flare to develop a patient-centered, consensus-based working definition. This consensus survey study used a modified eDelphi method involving consensus-building focus groups and a survey conducted from January 10 through October 24, 2023. Focus groups were conducted virtually, and the online survey was advertised to National Eczema Association members. US adults aged 18 years or older with AD were recruited via convenience sampling. Lived experience of AD. The main outcome was consensus on which attributes of AD to include in a patient-centric definition of flare. Using a rating scale (range, 1-9), consensus for the modified eDelphi statement rating was defined as at least 70% of participants rating a statement as 7 to 9 (critical to a flare definition) and less than 15% rating it as 1 to 3 (not important). Twenty-six participants with AD who completed focus group activities (24 aged 18-44 years [92.3%] and 2 aged 45-64 years [7.7%]; 18 women [69.2%]) and 631 participants with AD (mean [SD] age, 45.5 [18.1] years; 533 women [84.5%]) who completed the survey were included in the analysis. Fifteen statements reached consensus from the focus groups, and of those, 12 reached consensus from survey participants. More than half (334 of 631 [52.9%]) of survey participants reported alignment with their health care practitioner on what a flare is, and most (478 of 616 [77.6%]) reported that a patient-centered definition would be useful when communicating with their health care practitioner about their condition. In this study, participants with AD reached consensus on what an AD flare means from the patient perspective. This understanding may improve research and care by addressing this key patient-centered aspect of evaluating treatment effectiveness.

50865 Efficacy of Step-up Abrocitinib Treatment in Combination With Topical Medicated Therapy for Treating Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Post Hoc Analysis of the JADE REGIMEN Trial

50865 Efficacy of Step-up Abrocitinib Treatment in Combination With Topical Medicated Therapy for Treating Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Post Hoc Analysis of the JADE REGIMEN Trial

From flare to care: Dermatologists' impact on pediatric atopic dermatitis hospital admissions.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic skin disease in the pediatric population; however, rates of admissions for flares in patients established with dermatology compared to those that are not established have not been fully assessed in prior studies. We reviewed electronic medical records of patients hospitalized (billing codes 99221-99223, 99217) with diagnoses encompassing AD, eczema, and dermatitis (ICD-10 codes L20.8-L20.9, L30.8-L30.9) between January 1, 2011, and December 31, 2021, at University Hospitals (UH) in Cleveland, Ohio. Patients were considered established with dermatology if they had been seen by a dermatology provider within 6 months prior to admission. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square goodness of fit. A total of 95 patient encounters met criteria for inclusion. Fifteen (15.8%) patients were established with dermatology at the time of admission and 80 (84.2%) were not. The chi-square value (x2 = 44.74) was greater than the critical value of 10.828 at one degree of freedom (p < .001). There were 8 patients who had more than one admission for atopic dermatitis flares; 2 of these patients were established with dermatology prior to their first admission, and 4 were established at the time of the second admission. The majority of patients admitted with AD flare were not established with dermatology. Many of these patients lived in a low socioeconomic area and missed follow-up appointments. Increasing access to dermatologic care for patients with atopic dermatitis, especially in lower-income areas, could aid in decreasing atopic dermatitis-related hospitalizations.

Towards a patient-centred definition for atopic dermatitis flare: a qualitative study of adults with atopic dermatitis.

The term 'flare' is used across multiple diseases, including atopic dermatitis (AD), to describe increased disease activity. While several definitions of an AD flare have been proposed, no single definition of AD flare is widely accepted and it is unclear what the term 'AD flare' means from the patient perspective. To understand AD flares from the adult patient perspective and to explore how adults with AD define an AD flare. Participants were adults with AD recruited from the National Eczema Association Ambassadors programme, a volunteer patient-engagement programme. They participated in online focus groups to discuss how they describe AD flares from their perspective, how they define its start and stop, and how they relate to existing definitions of flare. Using a grounded theory approach, transcripts were analysed and coded using an iterative process to identify concepts to support a patient-centred conceptual framework of 'flare'. Six 90-min focus groups of 3-8 participants each were conducted with 29 US adults (≥ 18 years of age) with AD who had at least one self-reported AD flare in the past year. When participants were presented with examples of previously published definitions of AD flare, participants found them problematic and unrelatable. Specifically, they felt that flare is hard to quantify or put on a numerical scale, definitions cannot solely be about skin symptoms and clinical verbiage does not resonate with patients' lived experiences. Concepts identified by patients as important to a definition of flare were changes from patient's baseline/patient's normal, mental/emotional/social consequences, physical changes in skin, attention needed/all-consuming focus, itch-scratch-burn cycle and control/loss of control/quality of life. Figuring out the trigger that initiated a flare was an underlying concept of the experience of flare but was not considered a contributor to the definition. The results highlight the complexity and diversity of AD flare experiences from the adult patient perspective. Previously published definitions of AD flares did not resonate with patients, suggesting a need for a patient-centred flare definition to support care conversations and AD management.

Association Between Short-Term Exposure to Environmental Air Pollution and Atopic Dermatitis Flare in Patients Treated With Dupilumab.

Association Between Short-Term Exposure to Environmental Air Pollution and Atopic Dermatitis Flare in Patients Treated With Dupilumab.

Oral food challenge in children with contact urticaria in reaction to cow's milk.

To evaluate the relationship between the occurrence of contact urticaria in reaction to cow's milk in infants and the diagnosis of cow's milk allergy (CMA) established by supervised oral food challenge. In this cross-sectional study, we identified 184 children who had undergone 221 oral food challenge (OFC) at a CMA reference center between July 2015 and August 2019. Of these, 23 (12.5%) had a history of contact urticaria to cow's milk and underwent a total of 30 OFC. Baked cow's milk OFC were excluded, and 21 children were included in the study. All data from clinical history and allergy tests (serum-specific IgE dosages and skin prick test [SPT] with reconstituted cow's milk formula) were recorded on standardized forms. The challenge was conducted with reconstituted cow's milk formula in increasing volumes every 15-20 min. 24 OFC were performed; 13/24 (54.2%) for diagnostic purpose and 11/24 (45.8%) to evaluate cow's milk tolerance. Allergy tests were positive in 14 patients (87.5%). Positive oral challenge outcomes were identified in 7/24. One patient had a late flare of atopic dermatitis and five children presented with immediate urticaria (two generalized urticaria and three perioral urticaria). The median papule diameter was 6.5 mm in patients with a positive OFC and 3.75 mm in the negative group (P = 0.02). The occurrence of contact urticaria might be the only manifestation among infants sensitized to cow's milk with tolerance to oral ingestion. Reactions due to oral challenge were related to a larger wheal diameter on the SPT.

P11 Pooling the evidence: a review of swimming and atopic dermatitis

Abstract Swimming is an excellent form of aerobic exercise and is an essential life skill. Many children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are advised not to swim because of concerns about negative impacts on their skin disease, and some children with AD do not swim because they are self-conscious about the appearance of their skin. We aimed to review the available literature on swimming and AD and scientifically analyse the potential impact of all components of swimming in AD – water, skin barrier, swimming gear and exercise. Studies examined the impact of swimming on the skin barrier and relative contraindications to swimming. Constituents of water that may affect AD include hardness, pH, temperature, antiseptics and other chemicals. Potential interventions to reduce damage included emollient application, special swim gear, and showering post-submersion. The benefits of swimming as a form of exercise in AD included reduced sweating, cardiorespiratory fitness and maintenance of healthy weight. Drawbacks of swimming as a form of exercise in AD included the limited benefit on bone mineral density. Future research should examine the impact of swimming on flares of AD using noninvasive biomarkers as well as clinical severity assessment, and assess the role for different types of emollient as an intervention for optimal eczema control. Based on the review we provide new guidance on how to advise parents and children with AD regarding general measures, swim wear, and pool-side interventions to minimize any deleterious effect on skincare, and maximize opportunities to swim.

The immunological and structural epidermal barrier dysfunction and skin microbiome in atopic dermatitis-an update.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common, chronic and relapsing inflammatory skin disease with various clinical presentations and combinations of symptoms. The pathophysiology of AD is complex and multifactorial. There are several factors involved in the etiopathogenesis of AD including structural and immunological epidermal barrier defect, imbalance of the skin microbiome, genetic background and environmental factors. Alterations in structural proteins, lipids, proteases, and their inhibitors, lead to the impairment of the stratum corneum which is associated with the increased skin penetration and transepidermal water loss. The elevated serum immunoglobulin E levels and blood eosinophilia have been shown in the majority of AD patients. Type 2 T-helper cell immune pathway with increased expression of interleukin (IL)-4, IL-5, and IL-13, has an important role in the etiopathogenesis of AD. Both T cells and keratinocytes contribute to epidermal barrier impairment in AD via a dynamic interaction of cytokines and chemokines. The skin microbiome is another factor of relevance in the etiopathogenesis of AD. It has been shown that during AD flares, Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) colonization increased, while Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis) decreased. On the contrary, S. epidermidis and species of Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Propionibacterium increased during the remision phases. However, it is not clear whether skin dysbiosis is one of the symptoms or one of the causes of AD. There are several therapeutic options, targeting these pathways which play a critical role in the etiopathogenesis of AD. Although topical steroids are the mainstay of the treatment of AD, new biological therapies including IL-4, IL-13, and IL-31 inhibitors, as well as Janus kinase inhibitors (JAKi), increasingly gain more importance with new advances in the therapy of AD. In this review, we summarize the role of immunological and structural epidermal barrier dysfunction, immune abnormalities, impairment of lipids, filaggrin mutation and skin microbiome in the etiopathogenesis of AD, as well as the therapeutic options for AD and their effects on these abnormalities in AD skin.

380 Patients maintain stable response with no or minimal fluctuations during treatment with lebrikizumab up to Week 52

Abstract Lebrikizumab is a monoclonal antibody that binds with high affinity and slow off-rate to interleukin (IL)-13, thereby blocking the downstream effects of IL-13 with high potency. ADvocate1 (NCT04146363) and ADvocate2 (NCT04178967) are identically designed phase 3, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trials evaluating lebrikizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). At Week 16 of both studies, lebrikizumab 250 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) showed statistically significant improvements in measures of skin clearance and patient reported outcomes. Patients treated with lebrikizumab achieved clinically meaningful improvements in the signs and symptoms of AD with fewer AD flares across multiple definitions than patients treated with placebo. In patients who met the protocol-defined criteria for response to lebrikizumab at Week 16, most patients treated with lebrikizumab Q2W and lebrikizumab every 4 weeks (Q4W) maintained an Investigator’s Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1 response (71% and 77%, respectively) and a 75% improvement in the Eczema and Severity Index from baseline (EASI 75; 78% and 82%, respectively) up to Week 52. The objective of this analysis is to determine the proportion and the individual efficacy trajectory of lebrikizumab-treated patients who exhibited a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy from Week 16 to Week 52 in Week 16 responders. Patients who responded to lebrikizumab at the end of the 16-week induction period were rerandomized 2 : 2 : 1 to receive lebrikizumab Q2W, lebrikizumab Q4W or placebo Q2W (withdrawal) for 36 additional weeks. Week 16 responders were defined as those achieving an EASI 75 or IGA 0/1 with a ≥2-point improvement and without rescue medication use. We defined no or minimal fluctuations as maintaining EASI 75 for at least 80% of the 10 study visits from Week 16 to Week 52. Separately, we analysed EASI 90 with the same criteria. We also analysed the proportion of patients who achieved each endpoint at all 10 maintenance period study visits. ADvocate2 analyses were performed on a modified population, excluding 17 patients who entered the maintenance period (from a single study site) and whose eligibility could not be confirmed. Therefore, analyses were performed on the modified pooled population of ADvocate1 and ADvocate2 patients. All analyses were performed post hoc. If patients used rescue medication, discontinued treatment or transferred to the escape arm, data collected at or after the event was imputed as nonresponse. In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, 291 patients met the criteria for response at Week 16 (EASI 75 or IGA 0/1 with a ≥2-point improvement and without rescue medication use) and were rerandomized to receive lebrikizumab Q2W (n = 113), lebrikizumab Q4W, (n = 118) or withdrawal (n = 60) from Week 16 to Week 52. The proportions of patients who maintained EASI 75 for at least 80% of the maintenance period were 71% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 71% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 60% (withdrawal). The proportions of patients who maintained EASI 75 at all study visits were 53% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 55% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 38% (withdrawal). The proportions of patients to achieve and maintain the more stringent response of EASI 90 for at least 80% of study visits were 45% (lebrikizumab Q2W), 51% (lebrikizumab Q4W) and 35% (withdrawal). In ADvocate1 and ADvocate2, approximately 7 out of 10 of patients who continued treatment with lebrikizumab maintained at least an EASI 75 response with no or minimal fluctuations. These individual patient data show that most patients treated with monotherapy lebrikizumab Q2W and Q4W maintain a stable response with no or minimal fluctuations of efficacy up to Week 52.

Dupilumab-associated mycosis fungoides: a cross-sectional study.

Treating atopic dermatitis (AD) with dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody that inhibits interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13), may be associated with the progression of mycosis fungoides (MF).This study aimsto examine the associations between the length of dupilumab treatment, age and sex, and the onset of MF.An institutional data registry and literature search were used for a retrospective cross-sectional study. Only patients with a diagnosis of MF on dupilumab for the treatment of AD and eczematous dermatitis were included.The primary outcome was the length of dupilumab exposure, age, sex, and the onset of MF. Linear correlations (Pearson) and Cox regression analysis were used to assess the correlation and the risk.A total of 25 patients were included in this study. Five eligible patients were identified at our institution. In addition, a PubMed review identified an additional 20 patients. At the time of MF diagnosis, the median age was 58, with 42% female. Disease history was significant for adult-onset AD in most patients (n = 17, 65.4%) or recent flare of AD previously in remission (n = 3, 11.5%). All patients were diagnosed with MF, and one patient progressed to Sézary syndrome while on dupilumab, with an average duration of 13.5months of therapy prior to diagnosis. Tumor stage at diagnosis of MF was described in 19 of the cases and ranged from an early-stage disease (IA) to advanced disease (IV). Treatment strategies included narrow-band UVB therapy, topical corticosteroids, brentuximab, pralatrexate, and acitretin. Male gender, advanced-stage disease, and older age correlated significantly with the hazard of MF onset and a shorter time to onset during dupilumab treatment.Our results suggest a correlation between the duration of dupilumab treatment and the diagnosis of MF, the higher MF stage at diagnosis, and the shorter the duration of using dupilumab to MF onset. Furthermore, elderly male patients appeared to be more at risk as both male gender and older age correlated with a hazard of MF diagnosis. The results raise the question as to whether the patients had MF misdiagnosed as AD that was unmasked by dupilumab or if MF truly is an adverse effect of treatment with dupilumab. Close monitoring of these patients and further investigation of the relationship between dupilumab and MF can shed more light on this question .

389 Association between short-term exposure to environmental air pollution and atopic dermatitis flare under treatment with dupilumab

389 Association between short-term exposure to environmental air pollution and atopic dermatitis flare under treatment with dupilumab

Pooling the evidence: A review of swimming and atopic dermatitis.

Swimming is an excellent form of aerobic exercise and is an essential life skill. Many children with atopic dermatitis (AD) are advised not to swim because of concerns about negative impacts on their skin disease, and some children with AD do not swim because they are self-conscious about the appearance of their skin. We aimed to perform a narrative review of the available literature on swimming and AD and scientifically analyze the potential impact of all components of swimming in AD-water, skin barrier, swimming gear, and exercise. Studies examined the impact of swimming on the skin barrier and the relative contraindications to swimming. Constituents of water which may affect AD include hardness, pH, temperature, antiseptics, and other chemicals. Potential interventions to reduce damage included emollient application, special swim gear, and showering post-submersion. The benefits of swimming as a form of exercise in AD included reduced sweating, cardiorespiratory fitness, and maintenance of healthy weight. Drawbacks of swimming as a form of exercise in AD included the limited benefit on bone mineral density. Future research should examine the impact of swimming on flares of AD using noninvasive biomarkers as well as clinical severity assessment and assess the role for different types of emollient as an intervention for optimal eczema control. This review highlights gaps in the scientific literature on swimming and AD and provides evidence-based guidance on interventions to minimize deleterious effects on skincare and maximize opportunities for children with AD to swim.

Effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate and severe atopic dermatitis in Colombia: Real-life experience

BackgroundDupilumab is a treatment approved for uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). Tropical and developing countries such as Colombia have characteristics that may impact the natural history of AD and access to medical treatments. In that sense, we aimed to describe the effectiveness and safety of dupilumab in adults with moderate to severe AD in a Colombian multicenter cohort. MethodsMulticenter descriptive study that included patients who started treatment between March 2018 and May 2020 in 6 centers. Disease severity was assessed using the following: Scoring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). These measurements were collected according to availability at baseline, 3–5 months, 6–12 months, and more than 12 months. Days of sick leave, hospitalizations, and AD flares before and after dupilumab treatment were reported. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded during follow-up. ResultsNinety-three patients were included, with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 24.0; 40.0) and a disease evolution time of 21 years (IQR: 16.0; 29.5). 88.2% had at least 1 allergic disease other than AD. An improvement greater than or equal to 75% EASI was observed in 41.7% of patients at 3–5 months, in 73.7% of patients at 6–12 months, and in 75.0% of patients after 12 months. For those reporting SCORAD and POEM, the median percent change ([IQR], n) from baseline in SCORAD was −67.1 ([−79.2; −54.2], n = 16), −70.5 ([−85.8; −47.9], n = 36) and −66.7 ([−77.3; −51.0], n = 13); and POEM, −58.6 ([−66.4; −55.5], n = 4), −73.0 ([−86.5; −66.7], n = 16) and −87.3 ([−93.4; −69.6], n = 8), respectively. Before initiation of dupilumab treatment, 82 (88.2%) patients reported at least 1 flare of AD in the past 12 months. During the follow-up period, 30 (32.3%) patients reported at least 1 exacerbation or flare. Twelve patients (12.9%) presented an AE and 3 (3.2%) patients discontinued dupilumab for this cause. ConclusionsDupilumab was effective and safe for the treatment of moderate to severe AD in point-of-care settings, with results similar to randomized controlled and other real-life studies. These positive results are still maintained even though a high number of patients had short interruptions in the use of dupilumab due to administrative problems.

Dupilumab-associated cutaneous adverse events among adult patients with atopic dermatitis: A retrospective study.

Dupilumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibiting interleukin (IL) 4 and IL-13, is approved for the treatment of moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) in children aged ≥6 years, adolescents, and adults. Both clinical trials and real-life data demonstrate its efficacy and safety. However, some cutaneous adverse events (cAEs) have been observed during real-world experiences. The authors' aim was to analyze the spectrum of cAEs in patients receiving dupilumab for the treatment of AD in a real-world setting. A retrospective review of electronic medical records was conducted for 916 patients (475 males and 541 females; mean age, 50.23 ± 19.66 years [range, 18-91 years]) who had received dupilumab for a minimum of 1month for the treatment of AD from December 2018 to November 2022 at the Department of Dermatology of University Federico II of Naples (Italy). The mean duration of dupilumab treatment was 27.31 ± 21.26 months. A total of 148 of 916 (16.15%) (90 males; mean age, 50.91 ± 15.34 years) patients reported other cAEs apart of AD flare; namely, facial redness (82 of 916; 8.95%), psoriasis (39 of 916; 4.25%), alopecia areata (11 of 916; 1.2%), skin peeling (11 of 916; 1.2%), parapsoriasis (three of 916; 0.32%), and vitiligo (two of 916; 0.21%). Thirty-one of 916 (3.38%) patients discontinued dupilumab because of cAEs (18 of 916; 1.96%) for facial redness, 10 of 916 (1.09%) for psoriasis, and three of 916 (0.32%) for parapsoriasis. In our population, most of the cAEs were mild and did not require discontinuation of dupilumab. These findings would enable dermatologists understand the cutaneous side effects of dupilumab better, resulting in improved treatment plan decisions in clinical practice.

Association between short-term exposure to environmental air pollution and atopic dermatitis flare in patients treated with dupilumab

BackgroundThe magnitude of short/medium-term air pollution exposure on atopic dermatitis (AD) flare has not been fully investigated. The aim of the study was to investigate the association of short/medium-term exposure to airborne pollution on AD flares in patients treated with dupilumab. MethodsObservational case-crossover study. Patients with moderate-to-severe AD under treatment with dupilumab were included. The exposure of interest was the mean concentrations of coarse and fine particulate matter (PM10, PM2.5), nitrogen dioxide, and oxides (NO2, NOx). Different intervals were considered at 1 to 60 days before the AD flare and control visit, defined as the visit with the highest Eczema Area and Severity Index scores >8 and ≤7, respectively. A conditional logistic regression analysis adjusted for systemic treatments was employed to estimate the incremental odds (%) of flare every 10 μg/m3 pollutant concentration. ResultsData on 169 of 528 patients with AD having 1130 follow-up visits and 5840 air pollutant concentration measurements were retrieved. The mean age was 41.4 ± 20.3 years; 94 (55%) men. The incremental odds curve indicated a significant positive trend of AD flare for all pollutants in all time windows. At 60 days, every 10 μg/m3 PM10, PM2.5, NOx, and NO2 increase concentration was associated with 82%, 67%, 28%, and 113% odds of flare, respectively. ConclusionsIn patients treated with dupilumab, acute air pollution exposure is associated with an increased risk for AD flare with a dose-response relationship.

Defining the temporal relationship between the skin microbiome, immune response and skin barrier function during flare and resolution of atopic dermatitis: protocol of a Danish intervention study

IntroductionLesional skin of atopic dermatitis (AD) is often colonised by Staphylococcus aureus and the bacterial abundance increases during a flare. However, the role of S. aureus and the skin microbiome...

Effect of COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) Vaccination on Patients with Atopic Dermatitis Treated with Dupilumab: A Multicenter, Observational Study.

Atopic dermatitis (AD) patients usually wonder if their condition will worsen after vaccination or if they should continue with the treatment they are receiving. Considering that many patients treated with dupilumab had previously experienced severe AD symptoms and flares, the concerns are more understandable. This study aimed to investigate the safety of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccination in patients with AD treated with dupilumab. We enrolled 133 patients (101 dupilumab-treated and 32 systemic oral agents-treated as control group) with AD from six hospitals. Patients were asked about worsening pruritus and AD (5-point Likert scale) after vaccination. AD variables (eczema area and severity index [EASI], investigator's global assessment [IGA], itch numerical rating scale [NRS], sleep NRS, and patient-oriented eczema measure [POEM]) were compared pre- and post-vaccination. Adverse reactions to the COVID-19 vaccination were observed. The incidence of adverse reactions to COVID-19 vaccines and worsening AD symptoms in dupilumab-treated patients were not significantly different compared with that in the control group. The itch NRS score increased significantly after vaccination (p<0.001). However, there were no statistically significant differences between the pre-and post-EASI, IGA, and POEM scores. Eight patients (7.9%) had worse EASI scores and required rescue therapy; however, most were easily managed with low-dose steroids or topical agents. None of the patients discontinued dupilumab treatment. No serious adverse reactions were observed in patients with AD after COVID-19 vaccination. Exacerbation of pruritus and AD symptoms was observed but was mostly mild and transient.

Quality of Life and Avoiding Triggers of Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Qualitative Study.

Quality of Life and Avoiding Triggers of Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Qualitative Study.

Quality of Life and Avoiding Triggers of Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Qualitative Study.

Quality of Life and Avoiding Triggers of Atopic Dermatitis Flares: A Qualitative Study.