Fixation In Total Hip Arthroplasty Research Articles

The resisted torsional stress test in diagnosis of femoral stem loosening in uncemented total hip arthroplasty - first description and retrospective study.

Aseptic femoral stem loosening is among the most common causes for revision in total hip arthroplasty (THA). We describe a simple clinical test that triggers pain in the proximal femur in patients with a loose stem. A previously described passive rotation test was associated with a poor sensitivity. The resisted torsional stress test (RTST) was used for several years in our hospital, and this is the first description of its reliability. We retrospectively reviewed our database of uncemented stem revisions. Preoperative clinical reports were searched for data on the RTST. A positive RTST was defined as sharp pain felt at the stem level with active internal rotation against a passive external rotation impulse in 90° hip flexion. The definition of stem fixation (fixed vs. loose) was made by readout of the surgery reports. The RTST was reported in 83 cases and was positive in 32 of the 43 stems, which were found loose intraoperatively and in 9 of the 40 stems, which were well integrated. This leads to an accuracy of classification of 79.5%. The sensitivity was 80% and the specificity was 79.1%. PPV and NPV were 78% and 81%, respectively. The RTST provides a helpful tool in the clinical assessment of femoral stem fixation in THA with good accuracy and should be included in standard follow-up examinations and in the assessment of painful THAs.

Are current rates of uncemented fixation in total hip arthroplasty supported by the literature? An update on the uncemented paradox.

The optimal fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. Initial concerns related to the long-term performance of cement fixation as well as cement disease led to the development of cementless implants, and registry data has indicated that the use of this type of fixation has increased in recent years. However, data from these same registries has not shown any improvement in outcomes when compared to cement fixation. On the contrary, while similar outcomes are seen when comparing these fixation types in younger patients (<70 years of age), cementless fixation has shown increased implant failure and revision rates in elderly patients (>70 years of age). Given the increased projected volume of THA in the United States over the next decade, it is important to utilise available data to make clinical decisions that minimise not only individual patient harm, but also the burden on the healthcare system itself. This review provides an overview of currently available outcomes data comparing cement and cementless fixation, as well as an updated analysis of current trends in fixation use in THA. We furthermore provide a comprehensive technique guide to help surgeons optimise cement fixation of the femoral component for THA and hemiarthroplasty.

Cemented Stem Design in Total Hip Arthroplasty: Fixation Philosophies, Biomechanics, and an Updated Classification System.

There is renewed interest in cemented femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the United States, and to fully appreciate the evolution of cemented femoral stem designs, an understanding of their history and design rationale is essential. To adequately study the outcomes of modern-day designs, a comprehensive classification system is also necessary. The biomechanical principles, failure mechanisms, and clinical outcomes associated with various cemented femoral stems are described in this comprehensive review. In addition, an updated version of an existing classification system is described that incorporates the primary design characteristics which differentiate implants currently in use. In this classification, implants are categorized as taper-slip (Type I), which are subdivided by Anatomic (IA), Double-Taper (IB), and Triple-Taper (IC) with subclassification for Traditional and Line-to-Line implants. Composite beam (Type II) implants are similarly divided into Anatomic (IIA), Straight (IIB), and Wedge (IIC) with subclassification for Polished, Satin, or Roughened finish. This classification system provides a basis for comparing cemented femoral stems, thereby improving our understanding of the effect of design characteristics on survivorship to guide future advancements and improve clinical outcomes.

Differences in acoustic parameters of hammering sounds between successful and unsuccessful initial cementless cup press-fit fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

It is important to analyze objectively the hammering sound in cup press-fit technique in total hip arthroplasty (THA) in order to better understand the change of the sound during impaction. We hypothesized that a specific characteristic would present in a hammering sound with successful fixation. We designed the study to quantitatively investigate the acoustic characteristics during cementless cup impaction in THA. In 52 THAs performed between November 2018 and April 2022, the acoustic parameters of the hammering sound of 224 impacts of successful press-fit fixation, and 55 impacts of unsuccessful press-fit fixation, were analyzed. The successful fixation was defined if the following two criteria were met: 1) intraoperatively, the stability of the cup was retained after manual application of the torque test; and 2) at one month postoperatively, the cup showed no translation on radiograph. Each hammering sound was converted to sound pressures in 24 frequency bands by fast Fourier transform analysis. Basic patient characteristics were assessed as potential contributors to the hammering sound. The median sound pressure (SP) of successful fixation at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz was higher than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0694 (interquartile range (IQR) 0.04721 to 0.09576) vs 0.05425 (IQR 0.03047 to 0.06803), p < 0.001). The median SP of successful fixation at 3.5 to 4.0 kHz and 4.0 to 4.5 kHz was lower than that of unsuccessful fixation (0.0812 (IQR 0.05631 to 0.01161) vs 0.1233 (IQR 0.0730 to 0.1449), p < 0.001; and 0.0891 (IQR 0.0526 to 0.0891) vs 0.0885 (IQR 0.0716 to 0.1048); p < 0.001, respectively). There was a statistically significant positive relationship between body weight and SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz (p < 0.001). Multivariate analyses indicated that the SP at 0.5 to 1.0 kHz and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz was independently associated with the successful fixation. The frequency bands of 0.5 to 1.0 and 3.5 to 4.0 kHz were the key to distinguish the sound characteristics between successful and unsuccessful press-fit cup fixation.

Durability of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty With Cementless Stems Without a Collar in Elderly Patients Age 75 Years and Over

BackgroundCementless femoral fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) has increased in prevalence worldwide. However, cementless fixation in elderly patients is controversial due to the risks of periprosthetic fracture and aseptic loosening. This study evaluated outcomes in patients undergoing primary THA utilizing a cementless stem without a collar, comparing those less than 75 years to those older than 75 years. MethodsBetween 2011 and 2021, there were 2,605 cementless THAs performed by 4 surgeons utilizing a highly porous metal fixation surface without a collar and consistent clinical protocols. There were 469 patients who had an age ≥ 75 years. Revision rates, intraoperative fractures, and 90-day mortality were compared between cohorts. In the ≥ 75 year age group, there were more women, more American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification III or IV, a lower body mass index, and more kidney disease, osteoporosis, and thyroid disease (P ≤ .002). ResultsAll-cause revision rates trended lower for the ≥75 year age group compared to < 75 year (1.9 versus 3.5%, P = .082) at 20-months of follow-up. Moreover, there was no difference in all-cause femoral component revisions comparing ≥ 75 to < 75 year age groups (1.5 versus 2.2%, P = .375), with only 3 of 10 femoral revisions due to aseptic loosening being in the ≥ 75 year age group. Intraoperative fracture (0.2 versus 0.5%, P = .701) and 90-day mortality (0.2 versus 0.1%, P = .460) did not differ between ≥ 75 and < 75 year age groups. ConclusionsOlder patients had comparable revision rates compared to younger patients using cementless femoral fixation without a collar. Furthermore, there was no difference in 90-day mortality or intraoperative fracture rates. Study findings provide evidence for the safety and durability of cementless THA using collarless femoral stems in elderly patients ≥ 75 years of age. Level of EvidenceIII.

Cemented Versus Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty Following Femoral Neck Fracture in Patients Aged 65 and Older

BackgroundFemoral neck fractures are common in individuals over 65, necessitating quick mobilization for the best outcomes. There's ongoing debate about the optimal femoral component fixation method in total hip arthroplasty (THA) for these fractures. Recent U.S. data shows a preference for cementless techniques in over 93% of primary THAs. Nonetheless, cemented fixation might offer advantages like fewer revisions, reduced periprosthetic fractures, lesser thigh pain, and enhanced long-term implant survival for those above 65. This study compares cementless and cemented fixation methods in THA, focusing on postoperative complications in patients aged 65 and older. MethodsWe analyzed a national database to identify patients aged 65+ who underwent primary THA for femoral neck fractures between 2016 and 2021, using either cementless (n = 2,842) or cemented (n = 1,124) techniques. A 1:1 propensity-matched analysis was conducted to balance variables such as age, sex, and comorbidities, resulting in two equally sized groups (n = 1,124 each). We evaluated outcomes like infection, venous thromboembolism (VTE), wound issues, dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, etc., at 90 days, 1 year, and 2 years post-surgery. A P-value < 05 indicated statistical significance. ResultsThe cemented group initially consisted of older individuals, more females, and higher comorbidity rates. Both groups had similar infection and wound complication rates, and aseptic loosening. The cemented group, however, had lower periprosthetic fracture rates (2.5 versus 4.4%, P = .02) and higher VTE rates (2.9 versus 1.2%, P = .01) at 90 days. After 1 and 2 years, the cementless group experienced more aseptic revision surgeries. ConclusionsThis study, using a large, national database and propensity-matched cohorts, indicates that cemented femoral component fixation in THA leads to fewer periprosthetic fractures and aseptic revisions, but a higher VTE risk. Fixation type choice should consider various factors, including age, sex, comorbidities, bone quality, and surgical expertise. This data can inform surgeons in their decision-making process.

Clinical efficacy of greater trochanter osteotomy with tension wire fixation in total hip arthroplasty for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip

ObjectiveThe choice of osteotomy in joint replacement surgery for Crowe type IV developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a challenging and controversial procedure. In this study, we compared the clinical efficacy of a combination of greater trochanter osteotomy and tension wire fixation with that of subtrochanteric osteotomy.MethodsWe performed 15 primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) procedures between January 2016 and July 2020 on 13 patients with a combination of greater trochanter osteotomy and tension wire fixation (the GTT group) and 12 THA procedures in 11 patients using subtrochanteric osteotomy (the STO group). The mean follow-up was 2.8 years (range 2.2–4.5 years) in the GTT group and 2.6 years (range 2.5–4.3 years) in the STO group. Clinical scores and radiographic results were evaluated during the final follow-up for the 15 hips in the GTT group and 12 hips in the STO group.ResultsPostoperative Harris hip scores, implant position, and the surgery time did not differ between the treatment groups. There were no differences in preoperative leg length discrepancy LLD (P = 0.46) and postoperative LLD (P = 0.56) between the two groups. Bone union occurred within 6 months after surgery in 12 hips in the GTT group (92.3%) and in 9 hips (81.8%) in the STO group. One case in the GTT group and two cases in the STO group had nonunion, and additionally, there was one case of postoperative nerve injury in the STO group, while no symptoms of nerve damage were observed in the GTT group.ConclusionThe GTT method demonstrated many advantages and reliable clinical results for Crowe type IV DDH patients undergoing THA. This is a surgical method that warrants further development and promotion clinically.

IS TOTAL HIP ARTHROPLASTY FIXATION ASSOCIATED WITH OSTEOBLAST ACTIVITY IN PATIENTS WITH OSTEONECROSIS OF THE FEMORAL HEAD? A PROSPECTIVE CASE-CONTROL STUDY

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) outcome in patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head ONFH) are excellent, however, there is controversy when compared with those in patients with osteoarthritis (OA). Reduced mineralization capacity of osteoblasts of the proximal femur in patients with ONFH could affect implant fixation.We asked if THA fixation in patients with ONFH is worse than in those with OA.We carried out a prospective comparative case (OA)-control (ONFH) study of patients undergoing THA at our hospital between 2017 and 2019. The minimum follow-up was 2 years. Inclusion criteria were patients with uncemented THA, younger than 70 years old, a Dorr femoral type C and idiopathic ONFH. We compared the clinical (Merlé D'Aubigné-Postel score) and radiological results related with implant positioning and fixation. Engh criteria and subsidence were assessed at the immediate postoperative, 12 weeks, 6 months, 12 months and yearly. Osteoblastic activity was determined by mineralization assay on primary cultures of osteoblasts isolated from trabecular bone samples collected from the intertrochanteric area obtained during surgery.Group 1 (ONFH) included 18 patients and group 2 (OA), 22. Average age was 55.9 years old in group 1 and 61.3 in group 2. (p=0.08). There were no differences related with sex, Dorr femoral type or femoral filling. The mean clinical outcome score was 17.1 in group 1 and 16.5 in group 2 (p=0.03). There were no cases of dislocation, infection, or revision surgery in this series. There were 5 cases (28%) of femoral stem subsidence greater than 3mm within 6 first months in group 1 and 1 case (4.5%) in group 2 (p=0.05).Although there were no significant differences related to clinical results, bone fixation was slower, and a greater subsidence was observed in patients with ONFH. Greater femoral stem subsidence was associated with a lower capacity for mineral nodule formation in cultured osteoblasts. The surgical technique could influence THA outcome in patients with reduced mineralization capacity of osteoblasts.

Cemented Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty Reduces the Risk of Periprosthetic Femur Fracture in Patients 65 Years and Older: An Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry

BackgroundPeriprosthetic femur fracture (PPFx) is a devastating complication after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite concerns for increased PPFx, cementless fixation predominates in the United States. This study used the American Joint Replacement Registry to compare PPFx risk between cemented and cementless femoral fixation for THA. MethodsAn analysis of primary THA cases in patients aged 65 years and more was performed with the American Joint Replacement Registry data linked to Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services data from 2012 to 2020. Analyses compared cemented to cementless femoral fixation. We identified 279,052 primary THAs, 266,040 (95.3%) with cementless and 13,012 (4.7%) with cemented femoral fixation. Cox proportional hazard regression analyses evaluated the association of fixation and PPFx risk, while adjusting for sex, age, and competing risk of mortality. Cumulative incidence function survival curves evaluated time to PPFx. ResultsAge ≥ 80 years (P < .0001) and women (P < .0001) were associated with PPFx. Compared to cemented stems, cementless stems had an elevated risk of PPFx (Hazards Ratio 7.70, 95% Confidence interval 3.2-18.6, P < .0001). The cumulative incidence function curves demonstrated an increased risk for PPFx across all time points for cementless stems, with equal magnitude of risk to 8 years.` ConclusionCementless femoral fixation in THA continues to predominate in the United States, with cementless femoral fixation demonstrating increased risk of PPFx in patients aged 65 years or more. Surgeons should consider greater use of cemented femoral fixation in this population to decrease the risk of PPFx.

Acetabular fixation in total hip arthroplasty in the previously irradiated pelvis: a review of basic science and clinical outcomes.

Radiation therapy is a common primary, adjuvant, or palliative treatment for many intrapelvic tumors, including primary gastrointestinal, genitourinary, and hematopoietic tumors, as well as metastatic disease to bone. Radiation has well documented microbiologic and clinical effects on bone ranging from radiation osteitis to early degenerative changes of the hip joint and avascular necrosis of the femoral head. Conventional total hip arthroplasty methods have demonstrated high rates of failure in this population, with historical data describing aseptic loosening rates as high as 44-52%, as radiation have been shown to preferentially diminish osteoblast and osteocyte number and function and limit capacity for both cement interdigitation and biologic bony ingrowth. A review of the clinical literature suggests that patients with prior pelvic irradiation are at higher risk for both septic and aseptic loosening of acetabular components, as well as lower postoperative Harris Hip Score (HHS) when compared to historical controls. With limited evidence, trabecular metal shells with multi-screw fixation and cemented polyethene liners, as well as cemented cup-cage constructs both appear to be durable acetabular fixation options, though the indications for each remains elusive. Further prospective data are needed to better characterize this difficult clinical problem.

Efficacy and Safety of Acetabular Cup without Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objectives: Adequate initial fixation of the uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty is necessary to achieve long-term survival. Although screw fixation contributes to improved cup stability, there is currently no consensus on the use of this method. This study aimed to assess the existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of cup fixation in total hip arthroplasty without screws. Materials and Methods: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify RCTs published before February 2022. Primary outcomes were reoperation, cup migration, and Harris Hip Score. Secondary outcomes were the presence of a radiolucent line in the acetabular region, translation and rotation movement, and polyethylene wear. We conducted meta-analyses using the random-effects models. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for outcomes of interest; the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to summarize the body of evidence. Results: We included six reports from four studies. Total hip arthroplasty without screw fixation to the acetabular cup had little to no effect on reoperation (pooled relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.14–6.68; I2 = 0%), cup migration (pooled relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.29–10.33; I2 = 1%), Harris Hip Score (mean difference, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, −1.31–3.70; I2 = 0%), radiolucent line (pooled relative risk, 5.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.32–109.35), translation and rotation of all axes, and polyethylene wear (mean difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, −0.01–0.04; I2 = 0%), with very low certainty of evidence on all measures. Conclusions: The efficacy of acetabular cups without screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty remains uncertain, suggesting the need for prudent clinical application. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with low risk of bias are required.

Low-dose Preoperative Unshielded Radiation Is Effective in Heterotopic Ossification Prophylaxis and Does Not Affect Porous Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty at 2 Years Minimum Follow-up: A Radiographic Study.

Heterotopic ossification (HO) is a frequent complication of total hip arthroplasty (THA). HO can cause pain, limitation of range of motion, and instability. Radiation therapy (RT) for HO prophylaxis is well established but may interfere with early porous ingrowth and pullout strength of implants, as suggested by two animal studies. Although shielding of the bone from irradiation may theoretically protect ingrowth, it has been found to reduce RT effectiveness. Despite the popularity of porous implants in THA, the frequency of HO, and use of RT in its prophylaxis, the effect of RT on porous implant fixation in THA has not been previously reported. At our institution, we use unshielded, single-dose, preoperative 700 to 800 centigrays RT for HO prophylaxis in high-risk patients. We hypothesize that this RT protocol is effective and the press-fit technique protects porous implants during early ingrowth; therefore, long-term implant fixation is not compromised. This was a retrospective study aiming to determine fixation of porous THA implants, healing of trochanteric osteotomies, and efficacy of HO prophylaxis with this RT protocol. Thirty-nine patients with follow-up of 24 to 144 months (average 59.7 months) were included. All 26 porous-coated femoral implants (11 revisions and 15 primary) were well fixed. There were 33 porous-coated acetabular implants (18 revisions and 15 primary). Thirty (91%) were well fixed, and three revision implants (9%) demonstrated radiolucent lines in two zones, but patients were clinically asymptomatic. All nine trochanteric osteotomies healed uneventfully. RT provided effective HO prophylaxis in 33 of 39 hips (85%). Single, low-dose, preoperative RT without shielding does not increase aseptic loosening of porous implants manufactured with plasma porous spray or nonunion of extended trochanteric osteotomies. This protocol provides effective HO prophylaxis in high-risk patients undergoing primary and revision THA.

Cemented Vs Cementless Femoral Fixation for Total Hip Arthroplasty After Displaced Femoral Neck Fracture: A Nationwide Analysis of Short-Term Complications and Readmission Rates.

Active patients with displaced femoral neck fractures are often treated with total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, optimal femoral fixation in these patients is controversial. The purpose of this study was to compare early complication and readmission rates in patients with hip fracture treated with THA receiving cemented vs cementless femoral fixation. The National Readmissions Database was queried to identify patients undergoing primary THA for femoral neck fracture from 2016 to 2017. Postoperative complications and unplanned readmissions at 30, 90, and 180 days were compared between patients treated with cemented and cementless THA. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to compare differences between groups and account for confounding variables. Of 17,491 patients identified, 4427 (25.3%) received cemented femoral fixation and 13,064 (74.7%) cementless. The cemented group was significantly older (77.2 vs 71.1, P < .001), had more comorbidities (Charlson comorbidity index: 4.44 vs 3.92, P < .001), and had a greater proportion of women (70.5% vs 65.2%, P < .001) compared with the cementless group. On multivariate analysis, cemented fixation was associated with reduced rates of periprosthetic fracture (odds ratio: 0.052, 95% confidence interval: 0.003-0.247, P= .004) at 30 days but similar readmission rates at 30, 90, and 180 days (odds ratio range: 1.012-1.114, P > .05) postoperatively compared with cementless fixation. Cemented fixation was associated with greater odds of medical complications at 180 days postoperatively (odds ratio:: 1.393, 95% confidence interval: 1.042-1.862, P= .025). Cemented femoral fixation was associated with a lower short-term incidence of periprosthetic fractures, higher incidence of medical complications, and equivalent unplanned readmission rates within 180 days postoperatively compared with cementless fixation in patients undergoing THA for femoral neck fracture. Level III.

Uncemented total hip arthroplasty; increased risk of early periprosthetic fracture requiring revision surgery in elderly females

PurposeThe preferred method of stem fixation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains debatable. Uncemented THA favors a lower rate of aseptic loosening but has an increased risk of early periprosthetic fractures (EPF). We hypothesize that routine placement of uncemented THA by experienced surgeons diminishes this EPF-risk. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effect of age, gender, ASA classification and BMI of THA performed by experienced surgeons on the risk of EPF. MethodsA retrospective cohort study including all primary THAs and revision surgeries performed between 2012 and 2018. Possible predictive factors included are age, gender, BMI, ASA classification, presence of osteoporosis, Dorr classification, revision surgery type and clinical outcome. A number needed to treat (NNT) analysis was conducted assuming that cementing THA prevents EPF. Results2635 primary THAs were performed. Indications for 70 revisions included 18 EPF in uncemented THA female patients. Periprosthetic fractures without a relevant trauma occurred within six weeks in 16 patients. There was a statistically significant correlation between EPF-risk and age (P = 0.032), female gender (P = 0.001) and ASA classification (P = 0.015). For age ≥75, there was an increase in EPF (P = 0.047). With the assumption that cementing would prevent EPF, the NNT is 48. No statistically significant correlation was found between EPF and BMI, osteoporosis or Dorr classification. ConclusionFemale patients aged ≥75 have an increased EPF-risk after uncemented THA and would therefore benefit from treatment with a cemented stem. An ASA score of III-IV is an independent risk factor for EPF after uncemented THA.

Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Cement Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Finite Element Analysis of Proximal Cement Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty

Anthropometric Measurement About the Safe Zone for Transacetabular Screw Placement in Total Hip Arthroplasty in Asian Middle-Aged Women: In Vivo Three-Dimensional Model Analysis

BackgroundAlthough the pelvic vascular injury caused by a transacetabular screw is rare, it is a major local complication of total hip arthroplasty. We aimed to obtain anthropometric data about the safe zone for the placement of transacetabular screws by analyzing the three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction model and determine the safe length of transacetabular screws by performing the 3D simulated surgery. MethodsWe reviewed 50 hips of 25 patients who underwent lower extremity angiographic computed tomography scans retrospectively. We reconstructed the 3D models of 50 hips with normal pelvic bone and vascular status using the customized computer software. We measured the central angle and safe depth of the safe zone of the transacetabular screws on the 3D models. We also performed the 3D simulated surgery to confirm the safe length of screws in each hole of the customized cup implant. ResultsThe measured central angle of the posterior-superior area was 79.5°. And we determined a mean safe depth of 49.8 mm in the safe zone, with a central angle of 47.7°. During the 3D simulated surgery, we determined a mean safe length of the transacetabular screw of 43.3 mm when applied to a lateral hole on a line bisecting the posterior-superior area. ConclusionAlthough our study was limited by the use of a virtual computer program, the quantitative measurements obtained can help reduce the incidence of pelvic vascular injury during transacetabular screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty.

An Update on Cementless Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty.

➤ Cementless stems can be categorized using the updated classification system.➤ Short stems were designed as an alternative to conventional stems with the advantage of bone preservation, and they have grown in popularity with promising results; however, long-term outcomes are lacking.➤ Hydroxyapatite coating appears to have no advantage with respect to stem loosening.➤ The literature has shown no difference in revision rates between modular and nonmodular stems; however, with the advantages of equalizing limb lengths and offset come the drawbacks of corrosion and junctional fatigue failure of modular implants.➤ There is increasing use of cementless stems, including in octogenarians, with promising outcomes compared with cemented stems; however, there is a higher risk of periprosthetic fractures with cementless fixation, particularly in elderly female patients.

Application of porous titanium acetabular cup at hip arthroplasty in case of acetabulum wall defects

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) at acetabulum defects is an actual problem of modern orthopaedics, as it is associated with multiple complications. Objective: to evaluate the results of porous titanium cups application in patients with acetabulum defects of various etiologies. Material and methods: there were 83 patients (98 hip joints) in the period from 2016 to 2019 with acetabulum walls defects who underwent cementless THA with the use of porous titanium acetabular cups with «pressfit» fixation with Trabecular Titanium Metal (pores sized from 600 to 800 microns, porosity 80 %, elastic modulus 12.9 GPa, friction coefficient 1.08). The average age of the patients was 55.7 years (34 to 80 years); 28 men and 55 women. The average body mass index was 28.6. The assessment of acetabulum defects was carried out according to D’Antonio classification. In all cases, lateral approach to the hip joint was used, acetabular components were implanted in the anatomical position with the restoration of hip rotation center. In 9 cases the reconstruction of acetabulum defects was performed with structural autografts, in 87 — spongy autografts, in 2 — a combination of these two grafting methods. Results: the average follow-up for patients was 23 months. The functional state of the hip joint according to Harris Hip Score increased from an average of 37 to 89 points. During the post-operative follow-up, radiological signs of the components’ instability were not detected. All patients showed a complete incorporation of autografts after surgery. Conclusion. The use of porous titanium acetabular cups «press-fit» fixation in THA of patients with defects of acetabulum walls gives the possibility to obtain positive clinical outcome of surgical treatment in the early post-operation period.

Letter to the Editor Regarding Sukhsathein et al.: "Cup Alignment Change After Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty".

Letter to the Editor Regarding Sukhsathein et al.: "Cup Alignment Change After Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty".

In-Bundle Surgeons More Likely Select Cemented Femoral Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty for At-Risk Patients: The Medicare Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement Bundled Model.

Bundled payment models for lower-extremity arthroplasty have been shown to lower costs but have not reliably improved quality. It is unknown how the bundled payment model may affect surgeons' decisions that impact the quality of arthroplasty care. The purpose of this study was to compare the utilization of femoral component fixation modes by surgeons performing total hip arthroplasties (THAs) in at-risk patients in areas subject to Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) bundled payment model compared with patients treated by surgeons in areas exempt from the policy. Elective, primary THAs among elderly persons were identified from Medicare claims during 2017 and 2018, including the use of cemented or cementless femoral fixation. Multivariable regression models, applied to samples stratified by sex, were used to assess the association between CJR bundle participation and the use of femoral fixation mode. Analyses were adjusted for patient age, race or ethnicity, comorbidity burden, low-income status, and Census division of the hospital. Of 118,676 Medicare patients who underwent THA, 9.1% received cemented femoral components, and use of cement varied significantly by geographic region (p < 0.001). Patients who received cemented fixation, compared with patients who received cementless fixation, had significant differences in mean age (and standard deviation) at 78.3 ± 6.9 years compared with 74.5 ± 6.1 years (p < 0.001) for female patients and 77.3 ± 6.8 years and 74.2 ± 5.9 years (p < 0.001) for male patients; were more likely to be White at 94.0% compared with 92.7% (p < 0.001) for female patients and 95.1% compared with 93.8% (p = 0.046) for male patients; and had higher mean Elixhauser comorbidity index at 2.6 ± 2.2 compared with 2.3 ± 2.0 (p < 0.001) for female patients and 2.8 ± 2.4 compared with 2.4 ± 2.1 (p < 0.001) for male patients. In adjusted analyses, female patients in the CJR bundled payment model were more likely to have cemented fixation compared with female patients not in the CJR model (odds ratio [OR], 1.11 [95% confidence interval (CI), 1.05 to 1.16]; p < 0.001), whereas male patients in the CJR bundled payment model were less likely to have cemented fixation compared with male patients not in the CJR model (OR, 0.91 [95% CI, 0.83 to 0.99]; p = 0.029). In the bundled environment, surgeons were more likely to choose cemented femoral fixation for elderly female patients. This may be due to in-bundle surgeons being more risk-averse and avoiding cementless fixation in patients at risk for fracture or implant-related complications. Further research is needed to directly examine the impact of the bundle on surgeon decision-making.