Fixation Of Acetabular Fractures Research Articles

Anterior Approach for Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Using Anatomically Designed Plates: Maintenance of Reduction and Functional Outcomes at a Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up

Anterior Approach for Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Using Anatomically Designed Plates: Maintenance of Reduction and Functional Outcomes at a Minimum Five-Year Follow-Up

Short Term Outcome of Percutaneous Fixation of Transverse Acetabular Fractures

Short Term Outcome of Percutaneous Fixation of Transverse Acetabular Fractures

Las placas intrapélvicas suprapectíneas interfieren con la evaluación postoperatoria de la calidad de reducción por radiografía simple. Hallazgos sobre una serie retrospectiva de fracturas de acetábulo

IntroductionIntrapelvic suprapectineal plates play an important role in acetabular fracture fixation. However, the shape of these implants may interfere with the quality of reduction evaluations using plain X-rays. We sought to evaluate this artifact and its relationship with CT findings. Materials and methodsIn a retrospective, single-center series of 22 acetabular fractures, postoperative AP, alar and obturator X-ray views and CT images were evaluated by three independent observers. Cohen's kappa was used to examine interrater reliability. ResultsSuprapectineal plates interfered with the evaluation of the weight-bearing surface in 75.3%, and with all three oblique views in 43.9% of cases. The central segment was most consistently interfered with, corresponding to the area where the greatest malreduction was in 46.9% coronal and 42.4% of sagittal CT views. ConclusionsSince the quality of reduction has prognostic value and is a necessary guide for the surgical team, that CT may be considered for the postoperative examination of the most challenging acetabular fracture cases.

The Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes of Cerclage Cable Fixation for Displaced Acetabular Fractures Using a Posterior Approach: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background and Objectives: Cerclage cable fixation with 2 mm multiple-braided cables for displaced acetabular fractures has shown good midterm functional and radiographic outcomes. We retrospectively evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cerclage cable fixations over ten years. Materials and Methods: We extracted data for patients who underwent cerclage cable fixation for acetabular fractures at a single institution from 2007 to 2012. We adopted this procedure for acetabulum fractures with posterior column fractures. Postoperative reduction quality, complications, reoperations, and Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) hip objective functional scores were analyzed. Postoperative reduction quality was classified using plain radiography and computed tomography. Results: We evaluated nine patients with a mean follow-up period of 14.1 ± 2.6 years (range: 10.8-18.1 years). The mean age was 47.1 ± 15.5 years old (range: 28-74 years); the mean injury severity score was 13.6 ± 4.7 (range: 9-22). The most frequent type of fracture was a both-column fracture. Anatomical reduction quality was achieved in five cases. Four patients had hip osteoarthritis at the last follow-up; among them, one patient had worsening hip arthritis > 5 years after surgery, and one patient developed osteoarthritis > 10 years after surgery. Their postoperative reduction quality was worse than their anatomical reduction quality, and both engaged in physical labor. None of the patients underwent revision total hip arthroplasty. The mean JOA hip score was 90.9 ± 7.9 (range: 74-100); seven patients scored >90 at the last follow-up. Conclusions: Cerclage cable fixation showed satisfactory postoperative reductions and favorable long-term clinical outcomes. Long-term follow-up might be necessary for patients whose postoperative reduction is not anatomical to detect late occurrence of hip osteoarthritis, even if osteoarthritis is not evident during short-term follow-up periods.

Use of Dual Mobility Cups Reduce Dislocation Risk After Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fracture Concomitant With Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients Who are Over 60 Years Old

Treatment of complex acetabular fractures in patients over 60 remains challenging. Functional treatments for these fractures have yielded disappointing outcomes. Internal fixation may fail facing this porotic bone, and postoperative non weight bearing may expose the patient to decubitus complications. Our hypothesis was that use of a dual mobility cup (DMC) reduces dislocation risk after concomitant internal fixation and total hip arthroplasty (THA) for acetabular fracture in patients who are over 60 years old. A retrospective, observational non comparative and continuous study was conducted from January 2015 to September 2022. Patients aged over 60 years who had displaced acetabular fractures, treated surgically via concomitant internal fixation and THA, utilizing a DMC exclusively through the Kocher-Langenbeck approach and a minimum follow-up was of one year, were included. There were 45 patients (45 hips) who had an average age of 71 (range, 60 to 88) who were included (75.5% men). The main mechanisms of injury were the motor vehicle accidents (in 21 cases (46,7%)). Bi-column fractures were prevalent (46.6%). The analysis of complications included intraoperatively nerve palsy, postoperatively dislocations, deep infections, periprosthetic fractures and loosening. Clinical assessment included the Harris hip score (HHS) and the level of return to previous activities. Radiological evaluation assessed fracture union, periprosthetic osteolysis, graft integration, the presence of leg length discrepancy (LLD) and heterotopic ossification. There was one case of dislocation (2.2%) requiring reoperation for replacement of the prosthetic neck, and one patient (2.2%) experienced early THA infection, successfully treated with surgical lavage and antibiotics. Functional outcomes showed a mean HHS of 88 (range, 69 to 99) and 84% of patients resumed their previous activities. Radiological follow-up revealed no loosening. This study has shown that the use of DMC in concomitant THA with Open Reduction and Internal Fixation (ORIF) for acetabular facture in patient over age 60 years achieved a low dislocation rate with favorable clinical and radiological outcomes and a low complication rate.

Clinical and radiographic results of internal fixation of quadrilateral plate fractures of acetabulum.

Quadrilateral plate (QLP) is a relatively thin bony structure located below the pelvic brim proximal to the hip joint, so management of its fractures is challenging. Evaluation of the functional and radiological outcomes of internal fixation of quadrilateral plate acetabular fractures; comparison of two methods of fracture fixation. A prospective multicentric study including 30 patients who underwent open reduction and internal fixation of QLP fractures through modified Stoppa approach. Patients were divided into two groups according to the method of fixation (anatomical QLP plate vs suprapectineal and infrapectineal plates). Post-operative quality of reduction was evaluated using Matta score. Radiographical assessment according Matta's grading criteria and clinical outcome assessment using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were repeated at follow-up and at one year to assess displacement. Mean age of patients was 34.9 ± 12.1years. After one year follow-up, clinically mean HHS was 88. ± 5.74. Radiologically post-operative reduction quality was anatomical in 21 (70%) patients, satisfactory in eight (26.7%) patients and unsatisfactory in one (3.3%) patient. Matta's grading at the last follow-up was excellent in 21 (70%) patients, good in six (20%), fair in two (6.7%) patients and poor in one (3.3%) patient. No significant difference was recorded between the two groups in terms of radiographical and clinical results and rate of complications. Accurate reduction of quadrilateral plate fracture with secure fixation through modified Stoppa approach provides good and reproducible outcomes with few complications regardless the type of the implant.

Anatomical Posterior Acetabular Plate Versus Conventional Reconstruction Plates for Acetabular Posterior Wall Fractures: A Comparative Study.

Background: Functional recovery following the surgical fixation of acetabular posterior wall fractures remains a challenge. This study compares outcomes of posterior wall fracture reconstruction using an anatomical posterior acetabular plate (APAP) versus conventional reconstruction plates. Methods: Forty patients with acetabular fractures involving the posterior wall or column underwent surgery, with 20 treated using APAPs (APAP group) and 20 with conventional pelvic reconstruction plates (control group). Baseline patient characteristics, intraoperative blood loss and time, reduction quality, postoperative function, and postoperative complications were compared using appropriate non-parametric statistical tests. A general linear model for repeated measures analysis of variance was employed to analyze trends in functional recovery. Results: No significant differences were observed in baseline characteristics. APAP significantly reduced surgical time by 40 min (186.5 ± 51.0 versus 225.0 ± 47.7, p =0.004) and blood loss (695 ± 393 versus 930 ± 609, p = 0.049) compared to conventional plates. At 3 and 6 months following surgery, the APAP group exhibited higher functional scores (modified Merle d'Aubigné scores 10 ± 1.8 versus 7.8 ± 1.4, p < 0.001; 13.4 ± 2.8 versus 10.1 ± 2.1, p = 0.001), converging with the control group by 12 months (modified Merle d'Aubigné scores 14.2 ± 2.6 versus 12.7 ± 2.6, p = 0.072; OHS 31.6 ± 12.3 versus 30.3 ± 10.1, p = 0.398). Radiologically, the APAP group demonstrated superior outcomes (p = 0.047). Complication and conversion rates to hip arthroplasty did not significantly differ between groups (10% versus 15%, p = 0.633). Conclusions: The use of an APAP in reconstructing the posterior acetabulum significantly reduces surgical time, decreases intraoperative blood loss, and leads to earlier functional recovery compared to conventional reconstruction plates. The APAP provides stable fixation of the posterior wall and ensures the durable maintenance of reduction, ultimately yielding favorable surgical outcomes.

Clinical outcome of surgically treated displaced acetabular fractures with central dislocation using combined anterior and medial plating

&amp;lt;p&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Aim &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;Acetabular fractures are complex articular fractures with a big challenge for orthopaedic surgeons. Surgically managed displaced fractures carry favorable outcomes, especially if the articular surface is reduced accurately. This study aims to assess the clinical outcomes of surgical-ly fixed displaced acetabular fractures with central dislocation using combined anterior and medial plating.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Methods &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;We have retrospectively evaluated sixteen patients, who had surgically managed dis-placed acetabular fractures with central dislocation at our institute. All patients underwent open reduction and internal fixation using combined anterior and medial plating via the Kocher-Langenbeck, the ilioinguinal, or the Stoppa approach. The functional outcome was assessed using the Harris Hip score.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Results &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;Our study includes sixteen patients (12 males, 4 females) with a mean age of 35 years (range: 15-53 years). The mean follow-up was 7.8 years (range: 5-13 years). Functional outcomes were good to excellent in 12 (80%) patients and fair in 3 (20%) patients. At the final follow-up, the solid union had been achieved in all fractures, the mean HHS was 88.84 &amp;amp;plusmn; 7.61.&amp;lt;br /&amp;gt;&amp;lt;strong&amp;gt;Conclusion &amp;lt;/strong&amp;gt;Early reduction and surgical fixation of dis-placed acetabular fractures with central dislocation using combined anterior and medial plates appear to have good clinical outcomes.&amp;lt;/p&amp;gt;

Outcome of primary fixation of traumatic acetabular fractures

Objectives; Traumatic acetabular fracture is a major injury with high association of mortality, morbidity and long recovery period. Surgical management of acetabular fracture is a technical challenge needing high level of skills and vigilance because of the complex anatomy and risk to surrounding structures. We aim to look at two surgical techniques for fixation of acetabular fracture and their outcome in this study. Methods; Between April 2018 and March 2023, a total of 26 patients (15 males and 11 females) were treated for acetabular fracture fixation. 10 were treated with minima invasive technique Close reduction and per-cutaneous fixation because of good reduction was achieved under image guidance and 16 patients had ORIF with use of various recon plates, screws and wires. Results; All patients were followed up for 12 months. Among all patients, the clinical outcomes were recorded as excellent in 17 patients (17/26, 65%), good in 5 (5/26, 19%), fair in 2 (2/26, 7.7%), and poor in 2 (2/26. 7.7%), according to the modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel score. The average modified Merle d’Aubigné-Postel score was 15 ± 2.0 points (range, 10–18 points). The radio-logical healing was assessed according to the Matta score [22] and were reported excellent in 15 patients (15/26, 57.6%), good in 7 (7/26, 26.8%), fair in 1 (1/26, 3.8%),and poor in 3 (3/26, 11.5%). Conclusion; our study shows comparable clinical outcome for acetabular fracture fixation using either ORIF or CRPF technique. Right patient choice and good knowledge of anatomy is of paramount importance.

Acetabular posterior column screws via an anterior approach.

Screw fixation of acetabular column fractures is a well-established alternative option to plate fixation providing comparable biomechanical strength and requiring less surgical exposure. For displaced acetabular fractures involving both columns open reduction and plate fixation of one column in combination with a column-crossing screw fixation of the opposite column via a single approach is a viable treatment option. Preoperative planning of posterior column screws (PCS) via an anterior approach is mandatory to assess the eligibility of the fracture for this technique and to plan the entry point and the screw trajectory. The intraoperative application requires fluoroscopic guidance using several views. A single view showing an extraarticular screw position is adequate to rule out hip joint penetration. The fluoroscopic assessment of cortical perforation of the posterior column requires several oblique views such as lateral oblique views, obturator oblique views and axial views of the posterior column or alternatively intraoperative CT scans. The application of PCS via an anterior approach is a technically demanding procedure, that allows for a relevant reduction of approach-related morbidity, surgical time and blood loss by using a single approach.

The Pararectus approach: a preferred surgical approach for fixation of acetabular fractures predominantly involving the anterior column - a narrative review.

Beginning in France in the 1960s, the management of acetabular fractures has increasingly evolved toward surgical treatment strategies. The basic principles established by the pioneers of acetabular surgery, Letournel and Judet - anatomical reconstruction of the joint and stable osteosynthesis - remain unchanged. Modern advancements in surgical techniques aim to reduce access-related trauma and minimize complications. The notable rise in acetabular fractures among the elderly, which predominantly affect the anterior aspects of the acetabulum, has driven the development of less invasive, soft tissue-sparing anterior approaches. This evolution began with the ilio-inguinal approach in the 1960s, progressed to the modified Stoppa approach in the 2000s and, most recently, the Pararectus approach in the 2010s. Each of these approaches upholds the fundamental principles of effective acetabular fracture care, while offering distinct advantages and disadvantages. In this review, we examine the merits and limitations of the Pararectus approach, specifically focusing on its utility in the surgical treatment of anterior column posterior hemitransverse acetabular fractures. Ultimately, the success of the individual patient's outcome is less dependent on the chosen approach and more on the surgeon's experience and expertise. Ideally, surgeons should be proficient in all these approaches to tailor the surgical strategy to the individual patient's requirements, thereby ensuring optimal outcomes.

Post-traumatic Total Hip Arthroplasty After Acetabular Fractures: Benefits of the Hardinge Approach.

Post-traumatic arthritis is a common sequelae after undergoing open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) of acetabular fractures. This often necessitates conversion to total hip arthroplasty (THA) to help alleviate pain and improve function for these patients. Unfortunately, dislocation rates for post-traumatic THA have been alarmingly high especially when the posterior approachhas been used.In the setting of prior soft tissue disruption, the theoretical risk of dislocation is even greater. Conversely, the lateral or the abductor-split approach (Hardinge) is associated with decreased dislocation rates. In this retrospective case series, we evaluated the dislocation rate of the Hardinge approach on patients who underwent THA after developing post-traumatic arthritis after acetabulum ORIF.All patients who matched CPT code 27132 (Repair, Revision, and/or Reconstruction Procedures on the Pelvis and Hip Joint), from January 2009 to December 2019, and treated by the senior author, were pulled from the electronic medical record at the University of Pittsburgh Medical Center. Thirty-one of the resultant 110 were treated with THA for post-traumatic arthrosis through a lateral, abductor-splitting Hardinge approach and met the inclusion criteria for further study. Our case series involves 31 patients who underwent post-traumatic THA through a Hardinge approach: the mean age at the time of index acetabular ORIF is 48.5 years, the mean age at the time of THA is 53.5 years, and the mean interval between ORIF and ultimate THA was five years. The mean length of follow-up after THA was 22.4 months.Overall, patients did well with an all-cause revision rate of 9.7%, with no revision performed for loosening of either the acetabular or femoral component. One patient developed an infection. No patient in our group sustained a dislocation, and all implants were stable without evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. This study found satisfactory results withpatients undergoing THA via lateral or abductor split approach (Hardinge) for post-traumatic arthritis after acetabular ORIF. The use of a Hardinge approach for post-traumatic reconstruction of the hip may be protective against dislocation without increasing baseline risks in this difficult patient population.

Primary stability of multi-hole acetabular cup combined with posterior column plating for the fixation of complex acetabular fractures in elderly patients: a biomechanical analysis.

Acute total hip arthroplasty has gained increasing popularity in the treatment of complex acetabular fractures in elderly patients, but the biomechanical evidence is lacking. Therefore, we measured the primary stability to evaluate whether acute total hip arthroplasty using a multi-hole acetabular cup and posterior column plating through a single K-L approach can safely be used for treating complexed acetabular fractures in the elderly. In 18 composite osteoporotic hemipelves, T-type acetabular fractures were treated in three ways: CSP (Cup with acetabular screws augmentation combined with posterior plate) group, CP (Cup without acetabular screw combined with posterior plate) group and CSPA (Cup with acetabular screws combined with posterior plate and anterior plate) group. Each specimen was dynamically loaded (300 to 1700N, 1Hz). Primary stability of the acetabular cup and fracture gap was evaluated by 3-dimensional (3D) micromotions. No significant differences in the 3D-micromotions were observed among the CSP, CP and CSPA groups except the test point on the anterior column of the acetabulum in the CP scenario (CSP 49.33 ± 21.08μm vs. CP 224.83 ± 52.29μm, p < 0.001; CSPA 45.50 ± 12.16μm vs. CP 224.83 ± 52.29μm, p < 0.001). No significant differences in the fracture gap displacement on the posterior column of acetabulum were observed among the CSP, CP and CSPA groups. Our results show, that acute total hip arthroplasty using a multi-hole cup with acetabular screws and posterior column plating through single a K-L approach offers good primary stability to allow good osseous integration for treating complex acetabular fractures in the elderly. Furthermore, it also provides good fracture gap displacement on the posterior column.

Clinical, radiological and functional outcome following surgical fixation of acetabular fractures

Clinical, radiological and functional outcome following surgical fixation of acetabular fractures

Iatrogenic Sciatic Nerve Injury in Posterior Acetabular Surgery: Surgeon More Predictive Than Position.

To identify factors that contribute to iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy during acetabular surgery through a Kocher-Langenbeck approach and to evaluate if variation among individual surgeons exists. Retrospective cohort. Level I trauma center. Adults undergoing fixation of acetabular fractures (AO/OTA 62) through a posterior approach by 9 orthopaedic traumatologists between November 2010 and November 2022. The prevalence of iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy and comparison of the prevalence and risk of palsy between prone and lateral positions before and after adjusting for individual surgeon and the presence of transverse fracture patterns in logistic regression. Comparison of the prevalence of palsy between high-volume (>1 patient/month) and low-volume surgeons. A total of 644 acetabular fractures repaired through a posterior approach were included (median age 39 years, 72% male). Twenty of 644 surgeries (3.1%) resulted in iatrogenic sciatic nerve palsy with no significant difference between the prone (3.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.9%-4.9%) and lateral (3.3%, 95% CI, 1.3%-8.1%) positions (P = 0.64). Logistic regression adjusting for surgeon and transverse fracture pattern demonstrated no significant effect for positions (odds ratio 1.0, 95% CI, 0.3-3.9). Transverse fracture pattern was associated with increased palsy risk (odds ratio 3.0, 95% CI, 1.1-7.9). Individual surgeon was significantly associated with iatrogenic palsy (P < 0.02). Surgeon and the presence of a transverse fracture line predicted iatrogenic nerve palsy after a posterior approach to the acetabulum in this single-center cohort. Surgeons should perform the Kocher-Langenbeck approach for acetabular fixation in the position they deem most appropriate, as the position was not associated with the rate of iatrogenic palsy in this series. Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Impact Of Introducing 3D Printing-Assisted Surgery Into Clinical Practice For Traumatic Pelvic And Acetabular Fractures

BackgroundGiven the novelty of three-dimensional (3D) printing-assisted fracture surgery in orthopaedics, surgeon familiarity is limited and learning curve is high. As such, it is unclear how the introduction of 3D printing into clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fracture surgery would impact perioperative outcomes. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of introducing 3D printing-assisted surgery on perioperative outcomes for traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures. MethodsWe retrospectively identified consecutive patients who underwent surgical fixation of traumatic pelvic and acetabular fractures from 2018 to 2022 at a single tertiary hospital. The patients included in the study were divided into two groups: (1) 3D printing-assisted surgery and (2) conventional surgery. Baseline demographics and perioperative outcomes of total surgical duration, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, number fluoroscopy images, fluoroscopy duration and postoperative disposition were recorded and compared between the two groups. ResultsIn total, 26 patients were included in the present study, with 3D printing-assisted surgery being used in 34.6% (n=9) of cases. There were no significant differences in baseline demographics or fracture type between the 3D printing group and conventional group. As compared to patients who underwent conventional surgery, those that underwent 3D printing-assisted surgery had, on average, shorter surgical duration (299.8±88.2 vs 309.1±143.1 mins), lesser estimated blood loss (706.3±330.0 vs 800.0±584.2 ml), lower transfusion rates (50.0% vs 52.9%), lower number of intraoperative fluoroscopy images (62.8±74.5 vs 71.6±47.9 images) and shorter fluoroscopy duration (235.0±79.2 vs 242.3±83.5 mins), although statistical significance was not achieved. None of the patients in the present study developed surgical complications postoperatively. ConclusionThe introduction of 3D printing-assisted surgery in clinical practice for pelvic and acetabular fractures is a safe and viable adjunct in pelvic and acetabular surgery, achieving comparable perioperative outcomes in the initial phase.

Acetabular fractures in geriatric patients: epidemiology, pathomechanism, classification and treatment options.

The incidence of geriatric acetabular fractures has shown a sharp increase in the last decades. The majority of patients are male, which is different to other osteoporotic fractures. The typical pathomechanism generally differs from acetabular fractures in young patients regarding both the direction and the amount of force transmission to the acetabulum via the femoral head. Geriatric fractures very frequently involve anterior structures of the acetabulum, while the posterior wall is less frequently involved. The anterior column and posterior hemitransverse (ACPHT) fracture is the most common fracture type. Superomedial dome impactions (gull sign) are a frequent feature in geriatric acetabular fractures as well. Treatment options include nonoperative treatment, internal fixation and arthoplasty. Nonoperative treatment includes rapid mobilisation and full weighbearing under analgesia and is advisable in non- or minimally displaced fractures without subluxation of the hip joint and without positive gull sign. Open reduction and internal fixation of geriatric acetabular fractures leads to good or excellent results, if anatomic reduction is achieved intraoperatively and loss of reduction does not occur postoperatively. Primary arthroplasty of geriatric acetabular fractures is a treatment option, which does not require anatomic reduction, allows for immediate postoperative full weightbearing and obviates several complications, which are associated with internal fixation. The major issue is the fixation of the acetabular cup in the fractured bone. Primary cups, reinforcement rings or a combination of arthroplasty and internal fixation may be applied depending on the acetabular fracture type.

Delayed Fixation of Acetabular Fractures Affects Functional Outcomes and Health-Related Quality of Life, Not Just Quality of Reduction.

Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures remains a major problem in many parts of the world. No previous studies have reported the effect of fixation delay on health-related quality of life (HRQOL). We aimed to investigate the effect of delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures on health-related quality of life, EuroQol-5 Dimension questionnaire (EQ-5D), and other related outcomes. We retrospectively analysed 117 patients who underwent open reduction internal fixation for displaced acetabular fractures between 2014 and 2021. Patients were divided into groups based on the admission-to-surgery time (interval between injury and definitive surgery): 1-14, 15-21, and >21days. Patients were analysed for associations between admission-to-surgery time and postoperative outcomes, including operative time, estimated blood loss, blood transfusion, postoperative complication, and quality of reduction. Eighty-five patients with a mean follow-up time of 3.94 ± 1.84years were analysed for the association between admission-to-surgery time and conversion to total hip arthroplasty, the Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel score, EQ-5D score, ability to sit cross-legged, and ability to sit squat. Multivariable linear regression was used for continuous outcomes and logistic regression for categorical outcomes associated with delayed operative fixation. An admission-to-surgery time > 14days was associated with significantly higher blood loss [785mL (236-1335), p = 0.006]. For associated fractures, an admission-to-surgery time > 21days increased the risk of poor reduction [odds ratio (OR), 5.21 (1.42-19.11), p = 0.013]. Further, admission-to-surgery time > 21days was associated with poor Modified Merle d'Aubigné and Postel scores [OR, 8.46 (1.48-48.29), p = 0.016], EQ-5D pain domain [OR, 3.55 (1.15-11), p = 0.028], and EQ-5D usual activity domain [OR, 4.24 (1.28-14), p = 0.018]. Delayed operative fixation of acetabular fractures after 21days affected the functional outcomes and HRQOL, independent of the reduction status. Surgical interventions and patient referrals should occur at the earliest and within 21days from the time of injury. The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s43465-024-01163-x.

Acetabular Fracture Outcomes and Complications: An International Comparison

Introduction While there have been many technological advances in the treatment of acetabular fractures since the landmark article by Judet and Letournel, the effectiveness of many of these advances have not been definitively determined. Comparing patient outcomes between two countries with differing amounts of technological resources may identify the efficacy of such resources. Methods This study retrospectively compared 489 patients (373 US, 116 Romania) who underwent open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for acetabular fracture(s) in a Romanian trauma center and a United States (US) trauma center between February 2011 and August 2018. Results US patients had a higher rate for the following comorbidities: diabetes (p=.0268), obesity (p&lt;.0001), and hypertension (p&lt;.0001). US patients had a significantly shorter pre-op delay (p&lt;.0001). Matta’s criteria for initial quality of reduction did not vary significantly between countries (p=.1101). No significant difference was found in rates of DVT (p=.0722), postoperative infections (p=.2819), sciatic nerve lesions (p=.9999), or loss of reduction (p=.9999). US patients had significantly higher Brooker criteria scores for heterotopic ossification (p&lt;.0001). Conclusions There were no significant differences in outcomes between US and Romanian patients even though US patients received treatment using the latest technology while Romanian patients were treated using substantially fewer resources. Given that technological advances in surgical technique come at a considerable price, it makes sense to build upon this study to gain a more precise understanding of how these advances improve outcomes for patients, and whether or not they are worth the added cost.

Similar Medium-Term Revision Rates Following Acute Total Hip Arthroplasty Versus Open Reduction and Internal Fixation for Acetabular Fractures in the Elderly.

The management of elderly acetabular fractures is complex, with high rates of conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) after open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), but potentially higher rates of complications after acute THA. The California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development database was queried between 2010 and 2017 for all patients aged 60 years or older who sustained a closed, isolated acetabular fracture and underwent ORIF, THA, or a combination. Chi-square tests and Student t tests were used to identify demographic differences between groups. Multivariate regression was used to evaluate predictors of 30-day readmission and 90-day complications. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards model were used to estimate the revision surgery-free survival (revision-free survival [RFS]), with revision surgery defined as conversion THA, revision ORIF, or revision THA. A total of 2,184 surgically managed acetabular fractures in elderly patients were identified, with 1,637 (75.0%) undergoing ORIF and 547 (25.0%) undergoing THA with or without ORIF. Median follow-up was 295 days (interquartile range, 13 to 1720 days). 99.4% of revisions following ORIF were for conversion arthroplasty. Unadjusted KM analysis showed no difference in RFS between ORIF and THA (log-rank test P = 0.27). RFS for ORIF patients was 95.1%, 85.8%, 78.3%, and 71.4% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. RFS for THA patients was 91.6%, 88.9%, 87.2%, and 78.8% at 6, 12, 24 and 60 months, respectively. Roughly 50% of revisions occurred within the first year postoperatively (49% for ORIF, 52% for THA). In propensity score-matched analysis, there was no difference between RFS on KM analysis ( P = 0.22). No difference was observed in medium-term RFS between acute THA and ORIF for elderly acetabular fractures in California. Revision surgeries for either conversion or revision THA were relatively common in both groups, with roughly half of all revisions occurring within the first year postoperatively. III.