First-time Dislocation Research Articles

The Epidemiology of Pediatric Shoulder Dislocations in the United States.

Shoulder dislocations are the most common of all major joint dislocations and are a frequent cause of emergency department (ED) presentations. While the epidemiology of shoulder dislocations has been characterized in adults, it has not yet been done for children in the United States. The primary goal of this study was to calculate the incidence rate of pediatric shoulder dislocations in the United States. Secondary goals were to characterize the demographic information of children with shoulder dislocations as well as trends in management. The US Collaborative Network in TriNetX, a network of clinical data repositories containing patient data from over 100,000,000 unique individuals within the United States, was queried for patients younger than 18 years old diagnosed with shoulder dislocation from 2014 to 2024 using ICD codes. The demographic details were then extracted from the data set, and treatment approaches were determined by CPT coding. Over the past 10 years, there were 16,460 pediatric and adolescent patients diagnosed with a first-time shoulder dislocation in either an ED or ambulatory clinic. The overall incidence rate was 60.31 per 100,000 patients, while the incidence rate was 116.61 per 100,000 patients presenting in the ED and 33.95 per 100,000 patients presenting in ambulatory clinics that were under the age of 18 years. Most patients were male (73%), White (59%), and came from the southeastern region of the United States (36%). The most common treatment was a closed reduction (25%), followed by arthroscopic surgery (17%). The number of annual shoulder dislocations has increased over the past decade without an increase in the number of patients undergoing surgical treatment. There remains a high incidence rate of shoulder dislocations in the pediatric population of the United States. Despite evidence that early surgical treatment of shoulder dislocations offers improved outcomes, nonoperative treatment continues to be the most common modality without any increase in the percentage of patients undergoing surgical treatment. Level IV-descriptive epidemiological analysis.

Outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization for recurrent instability are equal to stabilization after a primary event.

Extensive literature exists relating to the management of shoulder instability, with a more recent focus on glenoid and humeral bone loss. However, the optimal timing for surgery following a dislocation remains unclear. There is concern that recurrent dislocations may worsen subsequent surgical outcomes, with some advocating stabilization after the first dislocation. The aim of this study was to determine if the recurrence of instability following arthroscopic stabilization in patients without significant glenoid bone loss was influenced by the number of dislocations prior to surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis was performed using the PubMed, EMBASE, Orthosearch, and Cochrane databases with the following search terms: ((shoulder or glenohumeral) and (dislocation or subluxation) and arthroscopic and (Bankart or stabilisation or stabilization) and (redislocation or re-dislocation or recurrence or instability)). Methodology followed the PRISMA guidelines. Data and outcomes were synthesized by two independent reviewers, and papers were assessed for bias and quality. Overall, 35 studies including 7,995 shoulders were eligible for analysis, with a mean follow-up of 32.7 months (12 to 159.5). The rate of post-stabilization instability was 9.8% in first-time dislocators, 9.1% in recurrent dislocators, and 8.5% in a mixed cohort. A descriptive analysis investigated the influence of recurrent instability or age in the risk of instability post-stabilization, with an association seen with increasing age and a reduced risk of recurrence post-stabilization. Using modern arthroscopic techniques, patients sustaining an anterior shoulder dislocation without glenoid bone loss can expect a low risk of recurrence postoperatively, and no significant difference was found between first-time and recurrent dislocators. Furthermore, high-risk cohorts can expect a low, albeit slightly higher, rate of redislocation. With the findings of this study, patients and clinicians can be more informed as to the likely outcomes of arthroscopic stabilization within this patient subset.

Patient Characteristics Influencing Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores Vary with Time from Patellar Dislocation and Number of Dislocations

ObjectivesDemographic characteristics of the patient population influence patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) following patellar dislocations. The time from injury and number of dislocations can also vary within the patient population. The hypothesis of the study is that characteristics of the patient population influencing Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) measures of pain, function and quality of life vary with time from patellar dislocation and number of dislocations. MethodsOutcome scores were evaluated for subjects in four groups: within five months of a first patellar dislocation (first-time group, n = 24), within five months of a recurrent dislocation (multiple group, n = 15), five to twelve months after a first dislocation (post-acute group, n = 14), and two years or longer after a first dislocation (two years group, n = 14). For each group, KOOS pain, physical function and quality of life scores were compared between males and females. KOOS scores were also correlated against age, body mass index (BMI), and time since first and most recent dislocation. ResultsFor the first-time dislocation group, physical function and quality of life scores were higher for men than women (p < 0.05). For the multiple dislocation group, pain and physical function improved as BMI decreased (p < 0.025), while quality of life improved as age decreased (p = 0.014). For the post-acute group, all three scores improved as BMI decreased (p < 0.05). For the two years group, all three scores worsened as time since first dislocation increased (p < 0.01). ConclusionsFollowing patellar dislocation, relationships between characteristics of the patient population and PROMs vary with time from injury and number of dislocations. In the acute phase following a first dislocation, PROMs likely reflect the traumatic injury. Based on relationships with BMI, outcomes likely reflect functional capacity of the knee in the acute phase of multiple dislocations and post-acute phase of a first dislocation. After multiple years, progressive degradation of the knee over time seems to influence PROMs. Level of EvidenceRetrospective study with more than one negative criterion (Level 4)

Physiotherapy rehabilitation experiences of people with shoulder dislocation in ARTISAN study: a qualitative study

BackgroundAcute Rehabilitation following Traumatic anterior shoulder dISlocAtioN (ARTISAN) was a large trial comparing the clinical and cost-effectiveness of two rehabilitation interventions in adults with a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation. Participants...

To Operate or Not? Evaluating the Best Approach for First-Time Patellar Dislocations: A Review.

Background: The optimal management of first-time patellar dislocations remains a subject of debate. While surgical intervention is often recommended to reduce the risk of redislocation, the benefits over conservative treatment regarding knee function and complication rates are not clearly established. This systematic review aims to compare the effectiveness of surgical versus conservative treatment in preventing redislocation and improving knee function, while also considering complication rates. Methods: A comprehensive search of databases, including PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science, was conducted up to July 2024. Seven randomized controlled trials involving 411 participants were included. The primary outcome was the redislocation rate, with secondary outcomes including knee function, complication rates, and the need for re-interventions. The quality of the studies was assessed using the PEDro scale. Results: Surgical treatment generally resulted in lower redislocation rates compared to conservative management. However, the improvement in knee function was inconsistent, with some studies showing no significant differences or even favoring conservative treatment. Surgical intervention was associated with a higher risk of complications and re-interventions, particularly in older studies with less advanced techniques. Conclusions: Surgical intervention appears effective in reducing redislocation rates but comes with a risk of complications. Conservative treatment remains a viable option, particularly for patients with lower activity levels or higher surgical risks. The decision between surgical and conservative management should be individualized, taking into account patient-specific factors and potential risks. Further high-quality research is needed to provide more definitive guidance.

Evaluation and Management of Glenohumeral Instability in Adolescent Patients: An Expert Consensus Statement.

Management of glenohumeral instability in the adolescent population can be both challenging and controversial. There are no current guidelines for optimal management of glenohumeral instability in this population (unidirectional or multidirectional), and the cutoff ages for transition to adult treatment are not known. To develop consensus-based guidelines for the management of glenohumeral instability in adolescents. Consensus statement. A 26-question, multiple-choice survey was developed after 2 rounds of iterations and was submitted to the orthopaedic surgeons of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine (PRiSM) Society. The survey comprised 3 sections-demographics, practice setting, and decision-making-and included cutoff ages and management in 5 specific case scenarios. Consensus-based guidelines were generated with 66% response agreement. An indication score was then applied to each response related to more aggressive management to determine if variables related to consensus (or lack thereof) could be identified. A total of 54 responses were returned. Of the respondents, 59% were from academic practice, 84% were pediatric orthopaedic fellowship trained, and 46% performed >25 shoulder instability cases per year. In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys aged <14 years and girls aged <13 years. Besides age, proximal humerus physeal status, injury mechanism, sport, and presence of bony injury affected treatment selection. The presence of a Bankart lesion was an indication for stabilization in first-time dislocations for contact athletes with a closing or closed physis, but not in patients with an open physis or noncontact injury mechanisms. For recurrent anterior shoulder dislocation, stabilization was preferred irrespective of physis status. Initial nonoperative treatment was preferred for multidirectional instability. In the setting of first-time anterior shoulder dislocation in patients with open physes, nonoperative treatment was preferred for boys <14 years and girls <13 years. Future multicenter prospective studies focusing on outcomes would help to validate current practice patterns, especially in scenarios for which no consensus was reached.

Medial patellofemoral ligament injury. Location-based rate of recurrent patellar dislocation after non-operative treatment

ObjectivesThe role of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) as a patellofemoral joint stabilizing structure is undisputable. After traumatic patellar dislocation, MPFL injury, together with bone edema in the medial patellar facet and lateral femoral condyle, is a pathognomonic finding in magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). MPFL injury in the femoral insertion has been reported to most likely predict recurrent dislocations. The objective of this study was to detect if any MPFL injury location predicts the earliest onset of the patellar re-dislocation. MethodsIn total, 64 eligible patients with a first-time traumatic patellar dislocation were recruited to the trial. The diagnosis was confirmed within 3 weeks with 3T magnetic resonance imaging. The location of the MPFL injury in MRI was localized at the patellar insertion, midsubstance area, femoral insertion, or a combination of these. During the three-year follow-up period, patellar re-dislocations, range of motion, quadriceps muscle atrophy, and daily symptoms were determined. All the patients were treated non-operatively. ResultsOut of 64 patients, 33 (51.6%) had at least one episode of patellar re-dislocation. Re-dislocations occurred in 8 out of 25 (32.0%) patients with the main injury at the femoral insertion, 5 out of 15 (33.3%) patients with the main injury at the midsubstance area, and 10 out of 24 (41.7%) patients with the main injury at the patellar insertion during the 36 months follow-up (p ​= ​0.758). According to Kaplan–Meier analysis, the location of MPFL injury did not have any statistically significant effect on the timing of re-dislocations. At 36 months, survival of patients with MPFL injury at the patellar insertion was 70.8%, which was not statistically significantly different than the survival in patients with injury at the femoral insertion (88.0%) or at the midsubstance area (93.3%). No differences between single and multiple MPFL injuries were found. At 4 weeks, the range of motion was more restricted in patients with MPFL injury at the femoral insertion (93.4° vs. 108.0° for injury at the midsubstance area and 107.7° at the patellar insertion). ConclusionThe location of MPFL injury did not have any statistically significant effect on timing or the rate of re-dislocations. The MPFL injury at the femoral insertion predicts decreased range of motion (ROM) of the knee and increased quadriceps muscle atrophy during the first three months after sustaining injury. Level of evidenceLevel III.

Application of a machine learning and optimization method to predict patellofemoral instability risk factors in children and adolescents.

Conservative treatment remains the standard approach for first-time patellar dislocations. While risk factors for patellofemoral instability, a common paediatric injury, are well-established in adults, data concerning the progression of paediatric recurrent patellar dislocation remain scarce. A reproducible method was developed to quantitatively assess the patellofemoral morphology and anatomic risk factors in paediatric patients using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and machine learning analysis. Data were analyzed from a retrospective review (2005-2022) of paediatric patients diagnosed with acute lateral patellar dislocation (54 patients) who underwent MRI and were compared with an age-based control group (54 patients). Patellofemoral, tibial, tibiofemoral and patellar height parameters were measured. Differences between groups were analyzed with respect to MRI parameters. The potential diagnostic utility of the parameters was assessed via machine learning and genetic algorithm analyses. Significant differences were observed between the two groups in six patellofemoral morphological parameters. Regarding patellar height morphological parameters, all methods exhibited significant between-group differences. Among the tibia and tibiofemoral morphological parameters, only the tibial tubercle-trochlear groove distance exhibited significant differences between the two groups. No sex-related differences were present. Significant variations were observed in patellar height parameters, particularly in the Koshino-Sugimoto (KS) index, which had the highest area under the curve (AUC: 0.87). Using genetic algorithms and logistic regression, our model excelled with seven key independent variables. KS index and Wiberg index had the strongest association with lateral patellar dislocation. An optimized logistic regression model achieved an AUC of 0.934. Such performance is considered clinically relevant, indicating the model's effectiveness for the intended application. Level Ⅲ.

Patient-reported Outcomes Following Nonoperative Treatment of Pediatric First‐Time Patellar Dislocation

BackgroundPatellar instability is a common pediatric knee injury. The purpose of this study was to analyze PROMs (patient-reported outcome measures) after non-operative treatment following a first-time pediatric patellar dislocation. MethodsIn this single-center, retrospective study, patients <18 years old between January 2012 and December 2019 with a first-time patellar dislocation were evaluated. From this cohort, we included all those patients who initially underwent non-operative management and followed up for at least 1 year. Measures of patellar height and patellofemoral dysplasia were collected. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected at the initial and follow-up visit. Univariate and multivariate analyses were utilized to determine the rate and risk factors for recurrence and the changes in PROMs. Results176 knees were included in the initial analysis, and 80 in the pre- and post-PROM analysis. There was a 41% rate of recurrence at a mean of 16.4 months of follow-up. In a multivariate logistic regression model, trochlear dysplasia (OR:4.53, 95%CI: 1.61–12.7, P=0.004), patella alta (OR:4.27, 95%CI: 1.76–10.3, P<0.001), and tibial tubercle trochlear groove (TT-TG) > 15mm (OR:2.49, 95%CI: 1.3–6.03, P<0.001) were significant risk factors for recurrence. Patients with or without recurrence showed significant improvements in PROMs at 1 year follow-up. However, both groups had mean scores below the population average. Regardless of recurrence or not, KOOS-Child QoL scores ranked the lowest among all PROM scores at the final follow-up. ConclusionsThe findings of this study provide further evidence of the high rate of recurrent instability and important associated risk factors to consider. We also found that despite the overall improvement in all PROM subscales 1 year following the initial episode, both recurrence and no-recurrence groups demonstrated lower mean PROM scores than normal values. Furthermore, quality of life subscales showed the smallest improvement among all patients. Our results may be used to counsel patients and families regarding expectations after first-time and recurrent patellar dislocations. Key conceptsPatellar instability is one of the most common pediatric sports injuries with a high risk of recurrence.(1)In the absence of other factors, a first-time patellar dislocation is generally treated non-operatively, but the long-term outcomes are not clear.(2)In this study, we found a high risk of recurrent dislocation. In addition, while the PROMs improved for all patients, even patients without evidence of further instability demonstrated patient-reported outcomes lower than the general population.(3)Future research may reveal subtle residual instability or other factors as the reason for the lower functional status and also compare these outcomes with operative reconstruction. Level of evidenceCase series, Level IV

Abnormal lateral meniscal signal in MRI after patellar dislocation does not indicate a meniscal tear: MR findings with surgical correlation

BackgroundCombined injuries observed with first-time lateral patellar dislocation (LPD) of the knee, particularly significant soft tissue injury, can inform surgical intervention criteria. PurposeThe purpose of this study was to compare MRI findings in LPD to surgical correlation concerning meniscal pathology as a guide for surgical management. Study designRetrospective case series, Level of evidence, 4. MethodsA retrospective review was conducted of 355 cases of patients with lateral patellar dislocation from 2012 to 2022. Imaging was reviewed by musculoskeletal radiologists blinded to surgical results for evidence of soft tissue injury, and associated arthroscopic data and operative reports were reviewed. ResultsOut of 44 cases of LPD in 42 patients who underwent MPFL reconstructive surgery, 27 (61%) cases had grade 2a or higher signal changes in the anterior horn of the lateral meniscus, of which 10 (23%) had grade 3 signal changes. There were zero cases of meniscal tear in these cases upon review of operative reports and arthroscopic images. ConclusionMRI findings of signal alterations in the lateral meniscus post-LPD may not indicate an actual tear. This could aid in surgical decision-making in primary LPD management.

Bony Bankart Lesion: Diagnosis, Management, and Outcomes.

» Bony Bankart lesions are fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim, commonly associated with a traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, and are diagnosed through radiological imaging and physical examination. Young male athletes playing contact sports are at highest risk of these injuries. Early diagnosis and treatment are crucial because, if left untreated, recurrent anterior shoulder instability and glenoid bone loss can occur. Both nonsurgical and surgical treatment options are available depending on the size of the lesion, with arthroscopic repair being the most common treatment method. After repair, patients typically have favorable outcomes with low rates of recurrent instability. This review aims to discuss the etiology, diagnosis, and treatment of bony Bankart lesions.» Bony Bankart lesions are fractures of the anteroinferior glenoid rim and occur in up to 22% of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations.» Young men involved in contact sports or combat training are at the highest risk of sustaining bony Bankart lesions.» Diagnosis and treatment of bony Bankart lesions are essential to prevent long-term shoulder instability.» Bony Bankart lesions can be treated either nonoperatively or operatively (arthroscopic vs open repair), with the size of the glenoid defect being the primary determinant of treatment.

Shoulder dislocations in professional male football (soccer): A retrospective epidemiological analysis of the German Bundesliga from season 2012/2013 until 2022/2023.

Injuries exert a detrimental impact on the team performance in professional football. Shoulder dislocations are known for their severity and often cause substantial lay-off times. However, there is a notable gap in the general understanding regarding the frequency and convalescence of these events in professional football. Thus, the aims of this study were (1) to determine the incidence, (2) to evaluate return to competition (RTC) and redislocation events (RDEs) and (3) to identify relevant player-, match- and injury-related parameters. All shoulder dislocations within the highest three German football leagues (1.-3. Bundesliga) during the seasons 2012/2013 until 2022/2023 were identified. Player-, injury- and match-related data were obtained by performing a media analysis. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics. p Value was set at 0.05. A total of 90 first-time shoulder dislocations in 89 players with a median age of 25 years (interquartile range [IQR]: 23-28) were available for analysis. The incidence was 9.1 per 1000 Bundesliga matches played and increased over time. Forty-four (49%) shoulder dislocations were treated conservatively and 46 (51%) operatively. Median RTC was 24 days (IQR: 12-43) following conservative and 103 days (IQR: 85-135) following surgical treatment (p < 0.001). Twenty-two (24%) players suffered a redislocation, of whom 13 (59%) underwent initial conservative and nine (41%) initial surgical treatment (not significant [n.s.]). RDE following conservative treatment was after a median of 4 months (IQR: 2-22) and 7 months (IQR: 3-23) following surgical treatment (n.s.). The incidence of shoulder dislocation within professional football is increasing and currently amounts to 9.1 per 1000 matches played. A conservative treatment leads to a quicker RTC, while frequency and time to RDE were similar regardless of treatment. The increasing incidence of shoulder dislocations in professional football necessitates an analysis of relevant injury mechanisms and the implementation of specific preventive measures. Level III.

Advice only versus advice and a physiotherapy programme for acute traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation: the ARTISAN RCT.

The extra benefit of a programme of physiotherapy in addition to advice alone, following first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation, is uncertain. We compared the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a single session of advice with a single session of advice and a programme of physiotherapy. The primary objective was to quantify and draw inferences about observed differences in the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score between the trial treatment groups 6 months post randomisation, in adults with a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation. A pragmatic, multicentre, superiority, randomised controlled trial with embedded qualitative study. Forty-one hospitals in the UK NHS. Adults with a radiologically confirmed first-time traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation, being managed non-operatively. People with neurovascular complications or bilateral dislocations, and those unable to adhere to trial procedures or unable to attend physiotherapy within 6 weeks of injury, or who had previously been randomised, were excluded. All participants received the same initial shoulder examination followed by advice to aid self-management, lasting up to 1 hour and administered by a physiotherapist (control). Participants randomised to receive an additional programme of physiotherapy were offered sessions lasting for up to 30 minutes, over a maximum duration of 4 months from the date of randomisation (intervention). The primary outcome measure was the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score. This is a self-completed outcome measure containing 12 questions (0-4 points each), with possible scores from 0 (worst function) to 48 (best function). Measurements were collected at 6 weeks, 3 months, 6 months and 12 months by postal questionnaire; 6 months was the primary outcome time point. The primary health outcome for economic evaluation was the quality-adjusted life-year, in accordance with National Institute of Health and Care Excellence guidelines. Between 14 November 2018 and 14 March 2022, 482 participants were randomised to advice (n = 240) or advice and a programme of physiotherapy (n = 242). Participants were 34% female, with a mean age of 45 years, and treatment arms were balanced at baseline. There was not a statistically significant difference in the primary outcome between advice only and advice plus a programme of physiotherapy at 6 months for the primary intention-to-treat adjusted analysis (favours physiotherapy: 1.5, 95% confidence interval -0.3 to 3.5) or at earlier 3-month and 6-week time points on the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score (0-48; higher scores indicate better function). The probability of physiotherapy being cost-effective at a willingness-to-pay threshold of £30,000 was 0.95. We found little difference in the primary outcome or other secondary outcomes. Advice with additional physiotherapy sessions was found likely to be cost-effective. However, small imprecise incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years raise questions on whether it is the best use of scarce physiotherapy resources given current service demands. Loss to follow-up was 27%; however, the observed standard deviation was much smaller than anticipated. These changes in parameters reduced the number of participants required to observe the planned target difference of four points. Our post hoc sensitivity analysis, accounting for missing data, gives similar results. Further research should be directed towards optimising self-management strategies. This study is registered as ISRCTN63184243. This award was funded by the National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme (NIHR award ref: 16/167/56) and is published in full in Health Technology Assessment; Vol. 28, No. 22. See the NIHR Funding and Awards website for further award information.

Indications of Arthroscopy in the Treatment of Patellar Instability in Children.

Purpose Understanding the relevant risk factors for patellar instability and the clinical and radiographic testsnecessary to determine optimal treatment. This case series intends to evaluate arthroscopic indications in the treatment of patellar instability in children. Methods From 2013 to 2021, 33 patients (seven to 16 years of age) with 35 knees sustaining first-time dislocation with loose bodies, recurrent dislocation or subluxation, and habitual dislocation were arthroscopically operated on according to the flow chart. Periods of follow-up were two to 10 years (avg. 5.5 years). Follow-up assessment included the recurrence, complications (joint stiffness and excessive reduction), and the final function outcomes by using the Kujala score. Results Among 35 knees, there were two (5.7%) first dislocations, 30 (85.7%) recurrent dislocations, and three (8.6%) habitual dislocations, lateral release 27/35 (77.1%), medial reefing 23/35 (65.7%), reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament(MPFL) 12/35 (34.3%). The major complication was a knee of extensive stiffness after medial reefing and lateral release. Recurrence was in 4/35 (11.4%) of knees, not correlated to lateral release (p=0.21), medial reefing, or reconstruction of MPFL (p=0.07); in about 23 knees of medial reefing, recurrence was significantly correlated to number of knots (p=0.045). The final functional results according to Kujala were 88-100 (avg. 95.5). Conclusions This study showed the role of arthroscopy in both medial reefing and reconstruction of MPFL in children by low recurrence rate and high Kujala score at final follow-up. There was no significant correlation between recurrence and the procedures as arthroscopic indications counted on the flow chart.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament and Lateral Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction after Tibial Tuberosity Transposition in a Young Woman with Patellar Instability

In patients with reccurent lateral and medial patellar instability, isolated medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction may be insufficient due to poor lateral retinacular tissue quality. In this report, we describe a case of a patient that underwent simultaneous MPFL and lateral patellofemoral ligament (LPFL) reconstruction on the left knee due to chronic bidirectional patellar instability. A 29-year-old female patient presented with first-time lateral patellar dislocation five years ago due to acute strain. She underwent a tibial tuberosity transposition in another hospital. After the surgery, she suffered from recurrent medial and lateral patellar dislocation and presented to our center. MPFL and concomitant LPFL reconstruction on the left knee was simultaneously performed due to bilateral patellar dislocation. The patella was stable postoperatively, and the patient underwent physiotherapy with successful results to date. Single-time patellar dislocation should be treated conservatively. Surgical treatment after the first episode of dislocation can magnitude the risk of postoperative complications. The simultaneous reconstructing of the LPFL yields patellar fixation indistinguishable from the native LPFL. These grafts provide separate tensioning depending on body anatomy, allowing for individualized stability. Anatomical MPFL reconstruction is supported by well-established high-quality research. Reconstructing the LPFL anatomically yields patellar fixation indistinguishable from the native LPFL.

Patellofemoral Instability in Pediatric and Adolescent Athletes: A Review of Risk Factors and Treatments.

Pediatric patellar instability can impair function and restrict activity participation. If left untreated, it can lead to a degenerative knee. The incidence of patellar dislocations is highest in adolescents between 10 and 17 years of age; more than half of all first-time patellar dislocations occur during sports. This article reviews the evidence of risk factors for traumatic patellar instability, surgical interventions, and return-to-sport (RTS) considerations for pediatric and adolescent athletes. Anatomic risk factors for patellar instability in pediatric and adolescent patients include trochlear dysplasia, elevated tibial tuberosity-trochlear groove (TT-TG) distance, patella alta, genu valgum, femoral anteversion and tibial torsion, and hyperlaxity.

Incidence of dislocation and associated risk factors in patients with a femoral neck fracture operated with an uncemented hemiarthroplasty

BackgroundSeveral factors might be associated with risk of dislocating following uncemented hemiarthroplasty (HA) due to femoral neck fracture (FNF). Current evidence is limited with great variance in reported incidence of dislocation (1–15%). Aim of this study was to identify the cumulative incidence of first-time dislocation following HA and to identify the associated risk factors.MethodWe performed a retrospective cohort study of patients receiving an HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) at Copenhagen University Hospital, Bispebjerg, in 2010–2016. Patients were followed until death or end of study (dec 2018). Dislocation was identified by code extraction from the Danish National Patient Registry.Variables included in the multivariate model were defined pre-analysis to include: age, sex and variables with a p-value < 0.1 in univariate analysis. A regression model was fitted for 90 days dislocation as the assumption of proportional hazard rate (HR) was not met here after.ResultsWe identified 772 stems (some patients occurred with both right and left hip) and 58 stems suffered 90 dislocations during the observation period, resulting in a 7% (CI 5–9) incidence of dislocation 90 days after index surgery. 55 of the 58 stems (95%) experienced the first dislocation within 90 days after surgery.Only absence of dementia was identified as an independent protective factor in the cause-specific model (HR 0.46 (CI 0.23–0.89)) resulting in a 2.4-fold cumulative risk of experiencing a dislocation in case of dementia. Several other variables such as age, sex, various medical conditions, surgery delay and surgical experience were eliminated as statistical risk factors.We found a decrease in survival probability for patients who experienced a dislocation during follow-up.ConclusionsThe incidence of first-time dislocation of HA (BFX Biomet stem, posterior approach) in patients with a hip fracture is found to be 7% 90 days after surgery. Due to the non-existing attribution bias, we claim it to be the true incidence. Dementia was among several variables identified as the only risk factor for dislocation.In perspective, we may consider treating patients with dementia by other methods than HA e.g., HA with cement or with a more constrained solution. Also, a surgical approach that reduce the risk of dislocation should be considered.

Consensus-Based Guidelines for Management of First-Time Patellar Dislocation in Adolescents.

The management of first-time patellar dislocation remains variable, with limited evidence to support or compare different operative and nonoperative modalities. The primary aim was to establish consensus-based guidelines for different components of nonoperative treatment following a first-time patellar dislocation. The secondary aim was to develop guidelines related to management after failed nonoperative treatment. The tertiary aim was to establish consensus-based guidelines for the management of first-time patellar dislocation with a concomitant osteochondral fracture. A 29-question, multiple-choice, case-based survey was developed by 20 members of the Patellofemoral Research Interest Group of the Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine Society. The survey consisted of questions related to demographic information, management of first-time patellar dislocation without an osteochondral fracture, and management of first-time patellar dislocation with a 2cm osteochondral fracture. The survey underwent 2 rounds of iterations by Patellofemoral Research Interest Group members and the final survey was administered to Pediatric Research in Sports Medicine members, using REDCap. Consensus-based guidelines were generated when more than 66% of respondents chose the same answer. Seventy-nine of 157 (50%) eligible members responded. Sixty-one were orthopaedic surgeons and 18 were primary sports medicine physicians. Eleven consensus-based guidelines were generated based on survey responses. Those that met the criteria for consensus included initial knee radiographs (99% consensus), nonoperative treatment for first-time patellar dislocation without an osteochondral fracture (99%), physical therapy starting within the first month postinjury (99%), with return to sport after 2 to 4 months (68%) with a brace (75%) and further follow-up as needed (75%). Surgical treatment was recommended if there were patellar subluxation episodes after 6 months of nonoperative treatment (84%). Patellar stabilization should be considered for a first-time dislocation with an osteochondral fracture (81.5%). Consensus-based guidelines offer recommendations for the management of first-time patellar dislocation with or without an osteochondral fracture. Several changing trends and areas of disagreement were noted in clinical practice. In the absence of high-level evidence, consensus-based guidelines may aid in clinical decision-making when treating patients following a first-time patellar dislocation. These guidelines highlight the evolving trends in clinical practice for the management of first-time patellar dislocation. Areas not reaching consensus serve as topics for future research.

Acute rehabilitation following traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation (ARTISAN): pragmatic, multicentre, randomised controlled trial

ObjectiveTo assess the effects of an additional programme of physiotherapy in adults with a first-time traumatic shoulder dislocation compared with single session of advice, supporting materials, and option to self-refer...

Epidemiology of Lateral Patellar Dislocation Including Bone Bruise Incidence: Five Years of Data from a Trauma Center.

Systematic summary of the epidemiology of patellar dislocation is rare. This study aims to investigate sex-, age-, type-, injury causing events-, incidence of bone bruise and time from last injury (TFLI)-specific characteristics, and detail the epidemiological characteristics of patellar dislocation. In this descriptive epidemiological study, a total of 743 patients who have a history of lateral patellar dislocation with either first-time patellar dislocation (FPD) or recurrent patellar dislocation (RPD) between August 2017 and June 2022 at our institution met the inclusion criteria and were selected in this study. Patient characteristics including the type, gender, age, events leading to patellar dislocation, incidence of patellar bone bruise, and the time from last injury (TFLI) of patellar dislocation were retrospectively obtained and described. Magnetic resonance imaging scans (MRI) of the knee were reviewed for insuring bone bruise. Among the 743 patients with patellar dislocation who required surgical reconstruction of the medial retinaculum, 418 (56.2%) had RPD and 325 (43.8%) had FPD. There were more females (65.0%) than males (35.0%) in patellar dislocation patients. Among the female patients, those aged <18 years had higher incidence (31.4%) of patellar dislocation. Among the male patients, those aged <18 and 19-28 years had higher incidence (16.8%) of patellar dislocation. Of all age groups, the prevalence rate of patellar dislocationwas high in juvenile population and females, but with no statistical significance. The most common patellar dislocation-causing event was sport accidents (40.1%), followed by life accidents (23.2%). The incidence of left-knee patellar dislocation was slightly higher than that of right-knee patellar dislocation. The incidence of patellar bone bruise of RPD (63.2%) was significantly lower (p < 0.05) than that of FPD (82.2%). Patellar dislocation patients with bone bruise had shorter time from last injury (TFLI) than those without patellar bone bruise (p < 0.05). The incidence of bone bruise of RPD was lower than that of FPD, and patients with patellar bone bruise may have a shorter time from last injury than those without bone bruise.