First-ray Mobility Research Articles

Weightbearing Computed Tomography and 3-Dimensional Analysis of Mobility Changes of the First Ray After Proximal Oblique Osteotomy for Hallux Valgus.

Hypermobility of the first ray has been evaluated using various methods and has conventionally been considered to be involved in the pathology of hallux valgus. We hypothesized that hypermobility of the first ray in hallux valgus could be decreased by simply correcting foot alignment without arthrodesis. This study sought to evaluate first-ray mobility using weightbearing computed tomography (CT) before and after proximal oblique osteotomy and also in healthy volunteer's feet. Subjects were 11 feet of 11 patients with primary hallux valgus who underwent surgery with a plantarly applied anatomic precontoured locking plate and 22 feet of 11 matched healthy volunteers. We performed nonweightbearing and weightbearing (using a load equivalent to body weight) CT scans using an original loading device preoperatively and 1-1.5 years postoperatively. Three-dimensional displacement of the distal bone relative to the proximal bone was quantified for each joint of the first ray by comparing nonweightbearing and weightbearing CT images. At baseline, there were significant differences in hallux valgus angle (P < .001) and 1-2 intermetatarsal angle (P < .001) between healthy volunteer's feet and preoperative hallux valgus feet. Hallux valgus angle (P < .001) and 1-2 intermetatarsal angle (P < .001) differed significantly between before and after surgery. All first ray joint displacement under loading decreased postoperatively to within 2° of that in healthy volunteer's feet and showed no significant difference between postoperatively hallux valgus feet and healthy volunteer's feet (P > .05). We found that first metatarsal osteotomy even without arthrodesis corrected deformity and decreased mobility of the first ray after hallux valgus surgery. Level III, case-control study.

Hypermobility of the First Ray: the Cinderella of the measurements conventionally assessed for correction of Hallux Valgus.

Background and aim of the work:hypermobility of the first ray (FRH) began to be considered as a pathological entity from Morton’s studies and was associated as a primary cause of hallux valgus (HV). Currently, this relationship is in discussion, and various authors consider FRH as a consequence of the deformity. The purpose of this narrative review is to summarise the most influential publications relating to First Ray Mobility (FRM) to increase knowledge and promote its conventional assessment during clinical practice.Methods:papers of the last century were selected to obtain a homogeneous and up-to-date overview of I-MTCJ mobility and HV, as well as their relationship and management.Results:in recent years, FRH was studied from a biomechanical and pathophysiologic point of view. There is still not enough data regarding the aetiology of FRM. The higher rate of instability found in HV lacks an explanation of which is the cause and which is the effect. However, the Lapidus arthrodesis is still a valid method in cases of FRH and HV, even if is not rigorously indicated to treat both. When approaching FRH, radiographic or clinical findings are mandatory for the right diagnosis.Conclusions:FRM is an important factor that must be considered in routine clinical practice and prior and post HV surgery, as much as the conventional parameters assessed. Surgeons should consider performing I-MTCJ arthrodesis only if strictly necessary, also paying attention to soft tissue balancing. Improving the measurement of FRH could be useful to determine if it is a cause or effect of the HV deformity. (www.actabiomedica.it)

Reliability of a new dynamic ultrasound test for quantifying first-ray mobility

BackgroundFirst-ray hypermobility (FRHM) is a documented abnormality whose pathogenic role is controversial. FRHM has been suggested to participate in many common disorders such as paediatric hallux valgus and recurrence after hallux valgus surgery. The controversy is due to lack of functional data on the first tarso-metatarsal joint (TMT1) in real-life situations, to its major anatomical variability, and to the absence of simple investigation methods. The objective of this study was to assess the feasibility and the inter- and intra-observer reproducibility of a new dynamic ultrasound test that quantifies TMT1 mobility and is simple to use provided a good-quality ultrasound machine is available. HypothesisThe new ultrasound TMT1 mobility test is reproducible. Material and methodsThe 32 feet of 16 consecutive patients whose first ray was considered normal were included. Ultrasonography was performed at rest and during a stress test consisting in causing TMT1 gaping by applying a distal dorsal drawer movement to the first metatarsal. The two plantar bony prominences on either side of the TMT1 were identified, and the distance between them was measured at rest and during the stress test. The stress/rest ratio was computed. Each foot was tested twice by two different examiners, for a total of 128 tests. ResultsMean TMT1 gaping distance was 1.38mm (range, 1.01–2.02mm) at rest and 1.67mm (range, 1.12–2.95mm). The mean stress/rest ratio was 1.21 (range, 1.02–1.62). Both inter- and intra-observer reliability was strong for all measured parameters. DiscussionA simple and reproducible ultrasound test for measuring TMT1 mobility is described for the first time. The good reproducibility confirms the working hypothesis. This preliminary study was designed to validate the new test. The measured values need to be assessed in various disorders including FRHM, for which the test was designed. Should the results prove conclusive, the TMT1 gaping test may become a pivotal diagnostic tool. Level of evidenceIV, diagnostic study.

Measurement of Dorsal First Ray Mobility: A Topical Historical Review and Commentary.

Despite evidence that instability of the first ray (first metatarsal and medial cuneiform) alters the loading mechanics of the foot, surprisingly few studies have linked the condition with disorders of the foot. A factor limiting this research is the difficulty associated with measuring first ray mobility (FRM). To quantify dorsal FRM, clinicians and researchers have devised a variety of methods that impose a dorsally directed load, and record displacement. The methods include manual examination, radiographs, mechanical devices, and handheld rulers. Since different methods yield different results; each of these methods is worthy of scrutiny. This article reviews the methods used to quantify dorsal FRM and offers commentary on how the testing procedures could be standardized. The measurement of dorsal FRM informs surgical decisions, orthotic prescriptions, and research design strategies mostly as it pertains to the identification and treatment of first ray hypermobility. This review found sufficient support to recommend continued use of radiographs and mechanical devices for quantifying dorsal displacement, whereas measurements acquired with handheld rulers are prone to the same subjective error attributed to manual examination procedures. Since measures made with radiographs and existing mechanical devices have their own drawbacks, the commentary recommends ideas for standardizing the testing procedure and calls for the development of a next-generation device to measure dorsal FRM. This future device could be modeled after arthrometers that exist and are used to quantify stability at the knee and ankle. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.

Clinical Predictors of Dynamic Lower Extremity Stiffness During Running.

Lower extremity stiffness describes the relative loading and kinematics of the entire lower extremity during ground contact. Previously injured subjects demonstrate altered lower extremity stiffness values. Clinical analysis of lower extremity stiffness is not currently feasible due to increased time and cost. To determine the clinically identifiable contributors to lower extremity stiffness. In this cross-sectional controlled laboratory study, 92 healthy runners completed a clinical screening involving passive assessment of hip, knee, and ankle range of motion, along with body anthropometrics. The range of motion was predominantly assessed in the sagittal and frontal planes. In the same session, runners completed an overground kinematic and kinetic running assessment at 3.35 m/s (±5%) to obtain lower extremity stiffness. Correlations between lower extremity stiffness and clinical variables were completed. Modifiable variables were included in an all-possible-linear regressions approach to determine a parsimonious model for predicting lower extremity stiffness. Clinically modifiable measures included in the regression model accounted for 48.4% of the variance of lower extremity stiffness during running. The variables that predicted greater stiffness included greater body mass, less ankle dorsiflexion range of motion with the knee flexed, less hip internal rotation range of motion, and less first-ray mobility. Reduced lower extremity range of motion and greater body mass are associated with greater lower extremity stiffness during running. These variables could be addressed clinically to potentially alter lower extremity stiffness and injury risk. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2019;49(2):98-104. Epub 27 Jul 2018. doi:10.2519/jospt.2019.7683.

Evaluation of First-Ray Mobility in Patients with Hallux Valgus Using Weight-Bearing CT and a 3-D Analysis System

Some physicians report that patients with hallux valgus have hypermobility at the tarsometatarsal (TMT) joint of the first ray and 3-dimensional (3-D) deformity. With use of non-weight-bearing and weight-bearing computed tomography (CT), we evaluated the 3-D mobility of each joint of the first ray in feet with hallux valgus compared with normal feet. Ten feet of 10 patients with hallux valgus and 10 feet of 10 healthy volunteers with no foot disorders were examined. All participants were women. Weight-bearing (a load equivalent to body weight) and non-weight-bearing CT scans were made with use of a device that we developed. Orthogonal coordinate axes were set and a 3-D model was reconstructed. Each joint of the first ray was aligned with the respective proximal bone, and 3-D displacement of the distal bone relative to the proximal bone under loading was quantified. At the talonavicular joint, significantly greater dorsiflexion of the navicular relative to the talus was observed in the hallux valgus group compared with the control group. At the medial cuneonavicular joint, the hallux valgus group showed significantly greater eversion and abduction of the medial cuneiform relative to the navicular. At the first TMT joint, the hallux valgus group showed significantly greater dorsiflexion, inversion, and adduction of the first metatarsal relative to the medial cuneiform. At the first metatarsophalangeal joint, the hallux valgus group showed significantly greater eversion and abduction of the first proximal phalanx relative to the first metatarsal (all p < 0.05). The results of this study suggest that loading of the foot causes significant 3-D displacement not only at the TMT joint but also at the other joints of the first ray. There is increased mobility in the first ray in patients who have hallux valgus.

Personalized orthoses as a good treatment option for Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy of the foot.

We sought to assess the biomechanical characteristics of the feet of patients with Charcot neuro-osteoarthropathy and to determine reulceration rates before and after personalized conservative orthotic treatment. A longitudinal prospective study was performed in 35 patients with Charcot's foot. Although some patients had a history of ulcers, at the study outset no patient had ulcers. All of the patients underwent biomechanical testing and a radiographic study. A radiophotopodogram was prepared by superimposing an imprint of the sole on a plantar radiograph. Based on the results of these tests, an orthopedic insole was prepared and therapeutic footwear prescribed for each foot. The following variables were compared between the Charcot and unaffected feet: previous ulcers and ulcer sites, reulcerations produced after treatment, type of foot (neuropathic/neuroischemic), ankle mobility, first-ray mobility, and relaxed calcaneal stance position. Treatment efficacy was determined by comparing ulcers presenting in patients in the year leading up to the study period and the year in which treatment was received. In a 1-year period, 70 feet received orthotic treatment, of which 41 were Charcot's feet. Ulceration rates before the study were 73.2% in feet with Charcot's and 31.0% in those without. After 1 year of wearing the customized orthoses, rates fell significantly to 9.8% in the Charcot feet and 0% in the feet without this condition. Conservative customized orthotic treatment was effective at preventing ulcers and the complications that often lead these patients to surgery.

Reliability and Validity of Clinically Assessing First-Ray Mobility of the Foot

Reliability and Validity of Clinically Assessing First-Ray Mobility of the Foot

Reliability and Validity of Clinically Assessing First-Ray Mobility of the Foot

The objective of the present study was to determine the amount of agreement among three clinicians in the clinical assessment of dorsal mobility of the foot's first ray and the agreement between their assessments and that of a mechanical device designed to quantify first-ray mobility. Sixty feet from 30 individuals evaluated clinically by three health-care professionals were classified as having a hypomobile, normal, or hypermobile first ray. The amount of first-ray dorsal mobility of each participant's foot was then measured using a device specifically constructed for that purpose. The results of this study show generally poor agreement among the three clinicians on whether a foot should be classified as having hypomobility, hypermobility, or normal mobility of the first ray. The amount of agreement with the quantitative device was poor for two of the clinicians and moderate for the third clinician.

Measurement of first-ray mobility in normal vs. hallux valgus patients.

Hypermobility of the first ray is one causative factor in development of hallux valgus and an important factor in the treatment of hallux valgus, but measuring first-ray motion is difficult. There are two known ways of measuring first-ray motion. One is measuring the bony angle on the lateral foot X-ray using a modified Coleman block. The other is using devices. However, neither is suitable for clinical application. We introduce a simple, fast and easy way of measuring first-ray range of motion. Using this method, we compared the first-ray motion between a normal group and a hallux valgus group. Forty normal and 60 hallux valgus patients were included in the measurement. We measured the first-ray range of motion in the following way: with one hand we held the 2nd, 3rd, 4th, and 5th rays at the metatarsal head level with a simple right-angled indicator. With the other hand, we held the first ray at the metatarsal head level using a simple right-angled device, such as a scale. Keeping the other rays fixed, we moved the first ray up and down and recorded the average distance (d) 10 times to reduce intra-measurement differences. We also measured and recorded the first metatarsal length (L) on the anteroposterior foot X-ray film. Finally, we calculated the first-ray range of motion (alpha) using the above data. We also measured the hallux valgus angle and intermetatarsal angle in the hallux valgus patient group. With this method, the average first-ray motion was 10.3 degrees in the normal group and 12.9 degrees in the hallux valgus patient group. If we define 14 degrees, (that is, above the 95th percentile in the normal group) as having hypermobility, 38% of hallux valgus patients had first ray hypermobility. There was no correlation between first-ray hypermobility and either hallux valgus angle or intermetatarsal angle.