First-line Treatment Strategy Research Articles

Impact of time-of-day infusion of camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy on efficacy in advanced malignant tumors.

e14634 Background: The combination of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with chemotherapy has emerged as a standard first-line treatment strategy for advanced cancers. Camrelizumab and Tislelizumab, representative ICIs, have approval by the Chinese NMPA for first-line treatment of advanced cancers such as lung cancer and esophageal cancer. Previous studies have indicated that the timing of drug administration can influence the efficacy of ICIs. However, studies on the ICIs plus chemotherapy are lacking. Therefore, we conducted a retrospective study to explore the effect of the timing of infusion on patients with advanced cancer undergoing treatment with ICIs combined chemotherapy. Methods: We retrospectively enrolled a total of 253 patients diagnosed with advanced cancers between 2017 and 2023 in Guangdong Second Provincial General Hospital. Among these patients, 109 received camrelizumab (Cam cohort) plus chemotherapy and 65 received tislelizumab (Tis cohort) plus chemotherapy. Patients were grouped into morning (AM) and afternoon (PM) categories based on the timing of their ICIs administration (< 1 times versus ≥ 1 times after 16:00). The Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria V.1.1 was used to evaluate the response to treatment. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: The results consistently showed that the PM group had a longer PFS than the AM group in the overall patients (p < 0.01). In the Cam cohort, the PM group (n = 48) exhibited a longer PFS compared to the AM group (n = 61) (16.8 months vs. -, p = 0.02). However, no significant difference in PFS was observed among patients in the Tis cohort (AM vs. PM, n = 34 vs. n = 31, 16.1 months vs. -, p = 0.51). Subgroup analyses indicated that the PM group had a more favorable PFS treatment effect in most subgroups. The incidence of any Treatment Emerged Adverse Event (TEAE) (Cam cohort, AM vs. PM, 98.52% vs. 92.68%; Tis cohort, AM vs. PM, 97.05% vs. 100.00%) and grade 3 TEAEs (Cam cohort, AM vs. PM, 5.80% vs.7.30%; Tis cohort, AM vs.PM - vs. 12.90%) was similar in the Cam cohort and Tis cohort. The most common adverse events are anemia (Cam cohort vs. Tis cohort, 70.58% vs. 79.41%), thrombocytopenia (Cam cohort vs. Tis cohort, 54.41% vs. 58.82%) and lymphopenia (Cam cohort vs. Tis cohort, 44.11% vs. 44.11%). Conclusions: The findings of this study highlight a significant variation in daily rhythms among advanced cancer patients undergoing treatment with ICIs plus chemotherapy. Interestingly, a trend was observed in patients treated with camrelizumab, where those receiving treatment in the afternoon demonstrated a longer PFS. However, this trend was not observed in patients treated with tislelizumab. These results suggest that time-of-day infusion could potentially serve as a personalized strategy for patients treated with combination ICIs therapy.

Effectiveness of combined first-line medical treatment in acromegaly with prolactin cosecretion.

The aim of this study is to compare the response to first-line medical treatment in treatment-naive acromegaly patients with pure growth hormone (GH)-secreting pituitary adenoma (GH-PA) and those with GH and prolactin cosecreting PA (GH&PRL-PA). This is a retrospective multicentric study of acromegaly patients followed from 2003 to 2023 in 33 tertiary Spanish hospitals with at least 6 months of first-line medical treatment. Baseline characteristics, first-line medical treatment strategies, and outcomes were analyzed. We employed a multiple logistic regression full model to estimate the impact of some baseline characteristics on disease control after each treatment modality. Of the 144 patients included, 72.9% had a GH-PA, and 27.1% had a GH&PRL-PA. Patients with GH&PRL-PA were younger (43.9 ± 15.0 vs 51.9 ± 12.7 years, P < .01) and harboring more frequently macroadenomas (89.7% vs 72.1%, P = .03). First-generation somatostatin receptor ligand (fgSRL) as monotherapy was given to 106 (73.6%) and a combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline in the remaining 38 (26.4%). Patients with GH&PRL-PA received more frequently a combination therapy (56.4% vs 15.2%, P < .01). After 6 months of treatment, in the group of patients under fgSRL as monotherapy, those patients with GH&PRL-PA had worse control compared to GH-PAs (29.4% vs 55.1%, P = .04). However, these differences in the rate of disease control between both groups disappeared when both received combination treatment with fgSRL and cabergoline. In GH&PRL-PA, the biochemical control achieved with fgSRL as monotherapy is substantially worse than in patients harboring GH-PA, supporting the inclusion of cabergoline as first-line medical treatment in combination with fgSRLs in these subgroups of patients.

SINGLE-PILL, TRIPLE ANTIHYPERTENSIVE THERAPY IN RURAL SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA: PRELIMINARY EXPERIENCE

Objective: Arterial hypertension is worldwide the leading modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. Beside life-style changes, strong evidence supports the efficacy of pharmacological treatment in reducing the complications of hypertension. International guidelines have recommended single-pill, low-dose combinations as initial treatment strategy. We investigated whether management of hypertension through this approach is feasible and effective in a rural sub-Saharan Africa setting. Design and method: Diagnosis of hypertension was established over three sets of blood pressure measurements: during a community-based, house-to-house screening in 2020 and in 2022, and at the hypertension outpatient clinic. Blood pressure measurements were performed according to the ESH recommendations by trained personnel, using a validated, oscillometric device OMRON M7 IT-HEM-7322-E. In 98 individuals diagnosed to have arterial hypertension, once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide was prescribed at a dose suitable to their blood pressure values and clinical characteristics. They were instructed on its administration and potential side effects and encouraged towards lifestyle modifications. Treatment regimen was adjusted, if needed, at each outpatient clinic visit scheduled after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks Results: 79 patients (aged 61 [53-70] years; median and interquartile range) strictly adhered to the treatment schedule, while overall 19 individuals dropped-out (aged 70 [65-80] years) because of different reasons. About 20% were tobacco smokers and nearly all consumed alcohol. Blood pressure was &lt;140/90 mm Hg after 4 weeks in 44 (56%), after 8 weeks in 62 (78%), after 12 weeks in 69 (87%), and after 16 weeks in 74 (94%) participants. Excellent tolerance was widely reported. Conclusions: Management of hypertension with once-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide as initial treatment was feasible and effective also in a rural sub-Saharan setting, with very high rate of hypertension control in patients adherent to treatment. Our results provide real life evidence in favor of extensive implementation of single-pill combination therapy also in low- and middle-income countries where local Health Care Systems should include recommendation on their usage in national guidelines and should make them available also in rural and remote areas at low or no cost as reliable first-line treatment strategy

Comparative efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with chemotherapy in patients with advanced driver-gene negative non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and network meta-analysis

ObjectiveTo evaluate the efficacy of different combinations of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy (CT) in the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). MethodsWe obtained relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from databases such as PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library up to May 31, 2023. The analysis of clinical prognostic factors was performed using R 4.2.3 and STATA 15.0. The main outcomes measured were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), while secondary outcomes included the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and treatment-related adverse events of grade 3–5 severity (Grade ≥3 TRAE). ResultsA total of 17 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted between 2012 and 2023, involving 7792 patients. These trials evaluated 11 different treatment methods. The results of these trials showed that in terms of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), the combination of tislelizumab with chemotherapy and the combination of camrelizumab with chemotherapy were particularly effective. Moreover, when compared with other combination therapies, pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy showed superiority in terms of disease control rate (DCR) and objective response rate (ORR). Subgroup analyses further demonstrated that the addition of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) to chemotherapy significantly improved PFS and OS in patients without liver metastasis and in those with brain metastasis. Additionally, carboplatin-based combination therapy was found to confer favorable survival benefits in terms of PFS, while cisplatin-based combination therapy showed the most favorable outcomes in terms of OS. The results of subgroup analyses for overall survival (OS) showed that the combination of immunotherapy and chemotherapy yielded positive outcomes in specific subgroups. These subgroups were characterized by PD-L1 Tumor Proportion Score (TPS) of 50 % or higher, usage of anti-PD-1 medications, age below 65, male gender, smoking history, and non-squamous cell carcinoma histology. Superior effectiveness was demonstrated only in extending the progression-free survival (PFS) of female patients and patients with squamous carcinoma. Meanwhile, other patient cohorts did not show the same level of improvement. ConclusionsTislelizumab, camrelizumab or pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy may be the optimal first-line treatment strategies for NSCLC.

Infra-inguinal bypass surgery vs endovascular revascularization for chronic limb-threatening ischemia in average- and high-risk patients

ObjectiveThis study aimed to evaluate treatment outcomes after bypass surgery or endovascular therapy (EVT) in average- and high-risk patients with chronic limb-threatening ischemia (CLTI). MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed multicenter data of patients who underwent infra-inguinal revascularization for CLTI between 2015 and 2022. A high-risk patient was defined as one with estimated 30-day mortality rate ≥5% or 2-year survival rate ≤50%, as determined by the Surgical Reconstruction vs Peripheral Intervention in Patients With Critical Limb Ischemia (SPINACH) calculator. The amputation-free survival (AFS), limb salvage (LS), wound healing, and 30-day mortality were compared separately for the average- and high-risk patients between the bypass and EVT with propensity score matching. ResultsWe analyzed 239 and 31 propensity score-matched pairs in the average- and high-risk patients with CLTI. In the average-risk patients, the 2-year AFS and LS rates were 78.1% and 94.4% in the bypass group and 63.0% and 87.7% in the EVT group (P < .001 and P = .007), respectively. The 1-year wound healing rates were 88.6% in the bypass group and 76.8% in the EVT group, respectively (P < .001). The 30-day mortality was 0.8% in the bypass surgery and 0.8% in the EVT group (P = .996). In the high-risk patients, there was no differences in the AFS, LS, and wound healing between the groups (P = .591, P = .148, and P = .074). The 30-day mortality was 3.2% in the bypass group and 3.2% in the EVT group (P = .991). ConclusionsBypass surgery is superior to EVT with respect to the AFS, LS, and wound healing in the average-risk patients. EVT is a feasible first-line treatment strategy for high-risk patients with CLTI undergoing revascularization, based on the lack of significant differences in the 2-year AFS rate, between the bypass surgery and EVT cohorts.

Abstract 579: Assessing the longitudinal efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in a murine non-small cell lung cancer model using single-cell and spatial transcriptomics

Abstract Lung cancer has a high incidence rate and is the main cause of cancer-related deaths with 127,070 fatalities expected in the U.S. this year. Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for an estimated 85% of all lung cancer cases and is typically diagnosed at an advanced disease stage, where outcomes are often poor and treatment options are limited. Targeted therapies are only available to a minority of NSCLC patients with identifiable tumor-driving mutations. Anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (anti-PD-1) immunotherapy has become a first-line treatment strategy for patients without tumor-driving gene mutations. However, only 15-20% of NSCLC patients exhibit a positive response to anti-PD-1 therapy. Moreover, patients who initially respond to anti-PD-1 therapy still face the risk of primary or acquired resistance, potentially leading to cancer progression. This study leverages a murine lung cancer cell line representative of NSCLC isolated from a genetically engineered mouse model expressing KrasG12D and P53−/flox oncogenic mutations in club cells, employing a cell type-specific promoter (Scgb1a1). After successfully establishing the oncogenic cell line, the cells were subcutaneously injected into immunocompetent C57BL/6 mice and subjected to anti-PD-1 therapy for 3 weeks post-injection. Tumor growth curves revealed a significant size reduction in anti-PD-1-treated tumors when compared to the IgG isotype control group, as confirmed by a paired t-test analysis (p &amp;lt; 0.045). To evaluate the longitudinal dynamics of the tumor microenvironment, single-cell sequencing, and spatial transcriptomics were performed throughout effective anti-PD-1 treatment and following tumor relapse. Samples were collected at 2 time points during anti-PD-1 treatment, specifically at 1 and 3 weeks, as well as 3 weeks after the completion of the anti-PD-1 treatment. Subsequently, these samples underwent single-cell RNA sequencing and spatial transcriptomics using the 10x Genomics platform. Single-cell sequencing revealed modulations in immune recruitment throughout the treatment while relapsed tumors display elevated levels of myeloid gene expression and a shift to a highly fibrotic tumor phenotype post-anti-PD-1 therapy. These findings suggest that the established oncogenic cell line exhibits initial responsiveness to anti-PD-1 therapy in vivo before undergoing major changes within the tumor microenvironment. This study highlights the relevance and translational potential of our oncogenic cell line in advancing our understanding of NSCLC and its response to anti-PD-1 therapy. *This work was performed under the auspices of the U.S. Department of Energy by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory under Contract DE-AC52-07NA27344. LLNL-ABS-857319. Citation Format: Nicole F. Leon, Oscar A. Davalos, David Baliu-Rodriguez, Deepa K. Murugesh, Aimy Sebastian, Nicholas R. Hum. Assessing the longitudinal efficacy of anti-PD-1 therapy in a murine non-small cell lung cancer model using single-cell and spatial transcriptomics [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 579.

KEAP1 promotes anti-tumor immunity by inhibiting PD-L1 expression in NSCLC

Immunotherapy has become a prominent first-line cancer treatment strategy. In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the expression of PD-L1 induces an immuno-suppressive effect to protect cancer cells from immune elimination, which designates PD-L1 as an important target for immunotherapy. However, little is known about the regulation mechanism and the function of PD-L1 in lung cancer. In this study, we have discovered that KEAP1 serves as an E3 ligase to promote PD-L1 ubiquitination and degradation. We found that overexpression of KEAP1 suppressed tumor growth and promoted cytotoxic T-cell activation in vivo. These results indicate the important role of KEAP1 in anti-cancer immunity. Moreover, the combination of elevated KEAP1 expression with anti-PD-L1 immunotherapy resulted in a synergistic effect on both tumor growth and cytotoxic T-cell activation. Additionally, we found that the expressions of KEAP1 and PD-L1 were associated with NSCLC prognosis. In summary, our findings shed light on the mechanism of PD-L1 degradation and how NSCLC immune escape through KEAP1-PD-L1 signaling. Our results also suggest that KEAP1 agonist might be a potential clinical drug to boost anti-tumor immunity and improve immunotherapies in NSCLC.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).MethodsPatients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.ResultsA total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.ConclusionAddition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.

Single-Pill, Triple Antihypertensive Therapy in Rural Sub-Saharan Africa: Preliminary Experience.

Worldwide, arterial hypertension is the foremost preventable and modifiable cardiovascular risk factor. In addition to lifestyle changes, recent international guidelines recommend single-pill, low-dose combinations as initial treatment strategy. We investigated whether this approach is feasible in a rural sub-Saharan Africa setting. Diagnosis of hypertension was established over three sets of blood pressure measurements, performed according to the European Society of Hypertension recommendations by trained personnel, using a validated, automated, oscillometric device OMRON M7 IT-HEM-7322-E. In 98 individuals with arterial hypertension, aonce-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide was prescribed at an appropriate dose. Patients were instructed on its administration and potential side effects and encouraged towards lifestyle modifications. The treatment regimen was adjusted, if needed, at each outpatient clinic scheduled after 4, 8, 12, and 16 weeks. Seventy-nine patients (aged 61 [53-70] years; median and interquartile range) strictly adhered to the treatment schedule, while 19 individuals (70 [65-80] years) dropped out. Blood pressure was < 140/90 mmHg after 4 weeks in 44 (56%), after 8 weeks in 62 (78%), after 12 weeks in 69 (87%), and after 16 weeks in 74 (94%) participants. Excellent tolerance was reported. These results provide real-life evidence that hypertension management with aonce-daily, single-pill combination of olmesartan, amlodipine, and hydrochlorothiazide as initial treatment is feasible and effective alsoin a rural sub-Saharan setting. Single-pill combinations should be made available also in rural and remote areas in low- and middle-income countries as a reliable first-line treatment strategy.

Endovascular therapy of acute vertebrobasilar occlusions: influence of first-line strategy in the Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke (ETIS) Registry

BackgroundThe choice of the first-line technique in vertebrobasilar occlusions (VBOs) remains challenging. We aimed to report outcomes in a large cohort of patients and to compare the efficacy and safety...

Association of Case Duration with Late vs. Early Physical Therapy Initiation in Treatment of Work-Related Musculoskeletal Injuries: A Retrospective Analysis

Background:Occupational medicine providers treat patients who are injured while working. Conservative management with over-the-counter anti-inflammatory medicines, physical modalities (ice/heat), and activity restrictions are first-line treatment strategies. Physical therapy (PT) is often added to assist with patients’ return to baseline through symptom reduction and restoration of function. PT efficacy on outcomes and healthcare costs has been described in other patient populations but less described in injured worker populations. This study focused on associations between PT timing and case duration for treating musculoskeletal injuries in a regional injured workerpopulation.&#x0D; Methods:A retrospective chart review of 795 patients receiving care at Parkview Occupational Health (POH) for musculoskeletal injuries from 2017-2023 was conducted to determine if early PT was associated with case duration. Patients employed in Indiana and referred to PT within Parkview were included in the study. Age, BMI, and case duration were compared between early vs. late PT groups using two-sampled t-test. Race, sex, smoking status, and injury type were compared using chi-squared tests.&#x0D; Results:The mean case duration (73.41 days) when PT was initiated early (≤ 30 days after date of injury, DOI) was significantly shorter compared to the mean case duration (104.21 days) when PT was initiated late (p&lt;0.0001). Case duration was even shorter (67.61 days) when early PT was defined as ≤14 days after injury (p=0.001). There was no significant difference in case duration (mean difference=9.5 days) between patients initiating PT within 14 days and within 15-30 days (p=0.15). Injury type (back vs. other musculoskeletal injuries) was significantly associated with PT timing (p=0.002).&#x0D; Conclusion/Implications:Future analysis should compare case duration, days of restricted work, advanced imaging utilization, and specialist referral rate between patients with early and late PT initiation. This comparison will aid in development of best practice guidance for treatment of work-related musculoskeletal injuries at POH.

Transarterial Embolization of Anterior Cranial Fossa Dural AVFs as a First-Line Approach: A Single-Center Study.

Endovascular treatment has been increasingly used for anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs. Evidence on the safety and efficacy of different endovascular treatment strategies is limited. We report clinical and angiographic outcomes of patients with anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs who underwent treatment using transarterial embolization with n-BCA as a first-line approach. Consecutive patients undergoing treatment for anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs at the Amsterdam University Medical Centers between 2010 and 2023 were retrospectively included. Transarterial embolization was used as a first-line approach, while transvenous treatment and surgery were used in cases of unsuccessful transarterial embolization. Treatment was evaluated on the basis of the angiographic cure rate, procedural complications, and clinical outcome. Fourteen patients were included with 15 anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs. All patients underwent primary endovascular treatment (12 transarterial, 1 transvenous, and 1 combined). Complete occlusion using only transarterial embolization was reached in 69% of patients (9/13), while the overall complete occlusion by endovascular treatment was reached in 79% of patients (11/14). Navigation and embolization were performed through the ophthalmic artery in 13 patients, with no procedural complications. Visual acuity was preserved in all patients. Three patients underwent an operation after failed endovascular treatment. All patients had complete anterior cranial fossa dural AVF occlusion at follow-up. Treatment of anterior cranial fossa dural AVFs using transarterial embolization with n-BCA as a first-line approach is a safe and feasible first-line treatment strategy. No visual complications due to embolization through the ophthalmic artery occurred in this study.

Ibrutinib versus bendamustine plus rituximab for first-line treatment of 65 or older patients with untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia without del(17p)/TP53 mutation in China: a lifetime economic research study

BackgroundThe incidence and mortality rates of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) in China have recently increased. This study performed a long-term economic evaluation of the first-line treatment strategies ibrutinib (IB) or bendamustine (BE) plus rituximab (RI) for previously untreated older patients with CLL without the del(17p)/TP53 mutation in China.MethodsBased on clinical data from large, randomized trials, a Markov model including four disease states (event-free survival, treatment failure, post-treatment failure, and death) was used to estimate the incremental costs per quality adjusted-life year (QALY) gained from the first-line IB strategy versus the BE plus RI strategy over a 10-year period. All costs were adjusted to 2022 values based on the Chinese Consumer Price Index, and all costs and health outcomes were discounted at an annual rate of 5%. Sensitivity analysis was performed to confirm the robustness of base-case results.ResultsCompared to the first-line BE plus RI strategy, first-line IB treatment achieved 1.17 additional QALYs, but was accompanied by $88,046.78 (estimated in 2022 US dollars) in decremental costs per patient over 10 years. Thus, first-line treatment with IB appeared to have absolute dominance compared to the BE plus RI strategy. Sensitivity analysis confirmed the robustness of these results.ConclusionsThe first-line treatment with IB is absolutely cost-effective compared to the first-line BE plus RI treatment strategy for 65 or older patients with CLL without the del (17p)/TP53 mutation from the Chinese payer perspective. Therefore, it is strongly recommended that Chinese health authorities select the former strategy for these CLL patients.

Abstract C035: Chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy versus endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy as first-line treatment in patients with HR+/HER2+advanced breast cancer: A real-world trial

Abstract Purpose:This study is a real-world research to compare the efficacy of using chemotherapy plus anti-HER2 therapy versus endocrine therapy plus anti-HER2 therapy as first-line treatment for HR+/HER+ advanced breast cancer patients, aiming at providing a better treatment option for patients. Patients and methods: This study enrolled patients with advanced breast cancer who had complete medical records and were treated in the breast oncology department of Peking University Cancer Hospital from October 2010 to October 2022. These patients were pathologically confirmed with HR+/HER2+ and underwent first-line treatment with anti-HER2 therapy + endocrine therapy (HE group) or anti-HER2 therapy + chemotherapy (with/without endocrine maintenance therapy) (HC group). HER2 positive was defined as HER2+++ or HER2++ on immunohistochemical staining of tumor tissue and fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) testing showing HER2 gene amplification in patients. HR+ was considered when more than 1% of tumor cells expressed estrogen receptor (ER) and/or progesterone receptor (PR). The primary endpoints being investigated are progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The second endpoint is objective response rate (ORR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR). Results:From October 2010 to October 2022, a total of 181 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled in the study. Among them, 18 patients received endocrine therapy + anti-HER2 therapy in the first-line treatment stage, while 163 patients received chemotherapy + anti-HER2 therapy (70 patients underwent endocrine maintenance therapy). The median follow-up time was 67 months. The median PFS (mPFS) of the patients in HC group and the HE group were 14.32 months (95% confidence interval (CI) 12.83-15.81) and 9.78 months (95%CI 4.48-15.8), respectively (p=0.299), and no significant statistical difference was observed. Similarly, no significant statistical difference was achieved in the median OS (mOS) of the HC group and the HE group patients, with 126.87 months (95%CI 102.08-151.658) versus 96.00 months (95%CI 78.41-113.59) (p=0.076). In the HC group, the mPFS of patients who received endocrine maintenance therapy and those who did not receive endocrine therapy were 16.24 months (95%CI 12.11-20.37) and 12.36 months (95%CI 10.26-14.46), respectively. The ORR of the two groups of patients were 46.6% and 16.7% (p=0.0015), respectively. Conclusion: The analysis demonstrated that the combination of anti-HER2 therapy with endocrine therapy is not inferior to the combination of anti-HER2 therapy with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for HR+/HER2+ advanced breast cancer. It provides compelling evidence to support the selection of endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy as a first-line treatment strategy that that enhances the quality of life for patients without shortening their survival time. Citation Format: Yuehua Liang, Hui Ping Li, Zehui Yun. Chemotherapy plus HER2-targeted therapy versus endocrine therapy plus HER2-targeted therapy as first-line treatment in patients with HR+/HER2+advanced breast cancer: A real-world trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2023 Oct 11-15; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2023;22(12 Suppl):Abstract nr C035.

Abstract A043: Identifying critical vulnerabilities that sensitise Lkb1-mutant lung adenocarcinoma to T cell mediated killing

Abstract KRAS is the most frequently altered oncogene in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). While the clinical development of targeted therapies has improved the treatment of a subset of patients, the heterogeneity of KRAS mutant LUAD remains a clinical challenge. Identifying tumor intrinsic dependencies through common co-occurring mutations are one approach to more effectively target KRAS-mutant LUAD. Loss-of-function mutations in STK11/Lkb1, are frequently found co-mutated with KRAS, and comprise an aggressive form of the disease. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) targeting the PD-1/PD-L1 axis, which aims to unleash CD8 effector T cells against tumors, are currently used as a first-line treatment strategy for KRAS mutant patients. However, KRAS mutant tumors that harbour co-mutations in STK11 fail to respond to ICIs. A greater understanding of the tumor-intrinsic processes that allow STK11/Lkb1 mutant tumors to evade immune detection is required to enhance the response of ICIs and improve patient outcomes. Here, we have used an unbiased genome-wide CRISPR knockout screening approach in lung cancer cell lines generated from the Kras G12D/+/Lkb1 fl/fl (KL) mouse model to unveil tumor-intrinsic mechanisms involved in anti-tumor immunity. To identify gene targets that sensitise tumor cells to T cell mediated killing, a co-culture method using the OVA/OT-I system was employed. Importantly, sgRNAs targeting genes encoding components of interferon signalling (Jak1, Stat1, Ifngr1) and MHC-I presentation (B2m, H2-k1) were enriched following serial application of OT-I T cells, consistent with the role these pathways play in resistance to ICIs. Conversely, sgRNAs targeting several genes were found to sensitise KL tumor cells to T cell mediated killing. This included genes (Serpinb9, Ptpn2) previously implicated in increasing T cell-mediated tumor cell killing, supporting the robustness of our screening platform. Excitingly, sgRNAs targeting novel genes, not previously implicated in mediating anti-tumor immunity were also identified. Current investigations validating the ability of candidate genes to sensitise KL tumor cells to T cell killing will be presented. Together, these results demonstrate the power of whole genome CRISPR screens in identifying candidate genes that may serve as therapeutic targets to improve treatment responses in KRAS/STK11/Lkb1 mutant LUAD patients. Citation Format: Jackson A McDonald, Danielle Boyd, Sarah Diepstraten, Leanne Scott, Lin Tai, Andrew Kueh, Marian Burr, Sarah A Best, Marco J Herold, Kate D Sutherland. Identifying critical vulnerabilities that sensitise Lkb1-mutant lung adenocarcinoma to T cell mediated killing [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2023 Oct 1-4; Toronto, Ontario, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2023;11(12 Suppl):Abstract nr A043.

Effectiveness and Safety of Orelabrutinib Combined with Rituximab As First-Line Treatment in Marginal Zone Lymphoma

Background: Marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) collectively is the third most common type of B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) worldwide, with an increased trend in incidence during the last two decades (Rossi D E et al., N Engl J Med. 2022). The lack of predominant first-line systemic therapy and toxicities associated with current rituximab-based therapies have inspired the exploration of more optimal treatment strategies (Becnel MR et al., Br J Haematol, 2019). Given the crucial role of bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) in the B-cell receptor signaling pathway, BTK inhibitor has been proven to yield robust outcomes with improved tolerability in the development of NHL (Dhillon S et al., Drugs, 2021; Xu W et al., Blood, 2019; Song Y et al., Blood, 2019). Orelabrutinib is a novel BTK inhibitor with high selectivity and has been approved in China for relapsed/refractory MZL recently (Dhillon S et al., Drugs, 2021). Meanwhile, several clinical studies reported that orelabrutinib in combination with rituximab in NHL could preserve natural killer cell-mediated antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity induced by rituximab and enhance the clinical efficacy (Yu H et al., Mol Ther Oncolytics, 2021; Qu C et al., Blood, 2023). However, orelabrutinib plus rituximab as the first-line treatment for MZL remains largely understudied, thus, we conducted a retrospective study to evaluate its effectiveness and safety. Methods: Between July 27, 2021 and March 18, 2023, 10 patients with MZL who received orelabrutinib (150 mg, qd, po) with rituximab (375 mg/m 2, iv, day 1 of each 28-day cycle) as first-line therapy were included in this retrospective study. After 6 cycles of treatment, patients underwent orelabrutinib monotherapy (150 mg, qd, po) as maintenance for a year. Dynamic dose adjustment was performed according to the patient's clinical status. Effectiveness was assessed by positron emission tomography/computed tomography-based 2014 Lugano criteria. The primary endpoint was the overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Results: Ten patients (6 males; median age 63.5 years, range 45-76) were included in this study, 4 with extranodal MZL of mucosa-associated lymphoid tissue (40.0%), 2 with nodal MZL (20.0%), 1 with splenic MZL (10.0%), and 3 with unknown subtype (30%). Among a total of 10 patients, 3 (30%) achieved complete response (CR) and 6 (60%) attained partial response (PR) as their best response for an ORR of 90% ( Figure 1). After a median follow-up of 13.0 months (range 7.8-24.7), the median PFS was not reached and a 6-month PFS rate was 100% ( Table 1). OS could not be assessed due to there were no deaths occurred. As of the cut-off date (May 6, 2023), 8 patients received orelabrutinib maintenance treatment and the median duration of maintenance treatment was 9.6 months (range 3.0-17.8). The ORR was 75% (6/8) during maintenance treatment, while 1 patient had stable disease (SD) and 1 developed progressive disease (PD). In addition, abnormal hematology due to disease gradually recovered with the therapy within 4 months. No serious adverse events were observed. The off-target related AEs such as atrial fibrillation, diarrhea, and major hemorrhage were not reported. Conclusion: This retrospective data suggests that orelabrutinib with rituximab has an encouraging anti-tumor activity in MZL, with a favorable safety profile. These results provide a potential first-line treatment strategy in MZL. Further verification in prospective clinical trials of clinical outcomes of orelabrutinib in first-line MZL is warranted in the future.

Vinorelbine as First-Line Treatment in Stage IV Canine Primary Pulmonary Carcinoma.

Vinorelbine (VRL), a semi-synthetic vinca alkaloid commonly used in humans with advanced lung cancer, reaches high concentrations in the lung tissue, has proven antineoplastic activity and a low toxicity profile in dogs. Treatment-naïve, client-owned dogs with a cyto/histological diagnosis of advanced pulmonary carcinoma, selected from a laboratory database and previously subjected to imaging, were enrolled in the study. Vinorelbine (15 mg/m2) was administered weekly for 4 weeks and then fortnightly until progressive disease was documented. Staging work-up was repeated by means of diagnostic imaging after the fourth VRL (i.e., 28 days) and monthly thereafter; response to treatment was evaluated according to the RECIST. Toxicity was graded following the VCOGC group. Ten dogs met the inclusion criteria. Partial response was documented in eight dogs. Median time to progression was 88 days (range: 7-112) and median survival time for all dogs was 100 days (range 7-635). The most common side effect was neutropenia. The main limitations of the study were the absence of histological diagnosis in eight cases and the limited number of treated dogs. VRL is well tolerated with an adequate toxicity profile and may be useful in the management of advanced lung tumours if used as a first-line treatment strategy.

Recombinant Interleukin-1 Receptor Antagonist Is an Effective First-Line Treatment Strategy in New-Onset Systemic Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis, Irrespective of HLA-DRB1 Background and IL1RN Variants.

Human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DRB1*15:01 has been recently associated with interstitial lung disease (LD), eosinophilia, and drug reactions in systemic juvenile idiopathic arthritis (sJIA). Additionally, genetic variants in IL1RN have been linked to poor response to anakinra. We sought to reproduce these findings in a prospective cohort study of patients with new-onset sJIA treated with anakinra as first-line therapy. HLA and IL1RN risk alleles were identified via whole-genome sequencing. Treatment responses and complications were compared between carriers versus noncarriers. Seventeen of 65 patients (26%) carried HLA-DRB1*15:01, comparable with the general population, and there was enrichment for HLA-DRB1*11:01, a known risk locus for sJIA. The rates of clinical inactive disease (CID) at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years were generally high, irrespective of HLA-DRB1 or IL1RN variants, but significantly lower in carriers of an HLA-DRB1*11:01 allele. One patient, an HLA-DRB1*15:01 carrier, developed sJIA-LD. Of the three patients with severe drug reactions to biologics, one carried HLA-DRB1*15:01. The prevalence of eosinophilia did not significantly differ between HLA-DRB1*15:01 carriers and noncarriers at disease onset (6.2% vs 14.9%, P = 0.67) nor after the start of anakinra (35.3% vs 37.5% in the first 2 years of disease). We observed high rates of CID using anakinra as first-line treatment irrespective of HLA-DRB1 or IL1RN variants. Only one of the 17 HLA-DRB1*15:01 carriers developed sJIA-LD, and of the three patients with drug reactions to biologics, only one carried HLA-DRB1*15:01. Although thorough monitoring for the development of drug hypersensitivity and refractory disease courses in sJIA, including sJIA-LD, remains important, our data support the early start of biologic therapy in patients with new-onset sJIA irrespective of HLA-DRB1 background or IL1RN variants.

Optimal first-line treatment strategies of systemic therapy for unresectable gastrointestinal neuroendocrine tumors based on the opinions of Japanese experts.

There are several options for systemic therapy of gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (GEP-NEN), including somatostatin analogues (SSA), molecular-targeted agents, cytotoxic agents, and peptide receptor radionuclide therapy. However, the effectiveness of each agent varies according to the primary site. Although SSA and everolimus are key drugs used for systemic therapy of neuroendocrine tumors arising from the gastrointestinal tract (GI-NET), the optimal strategy for selecting among these modalities remains unexplored. Japanese experts on GI-NET discussed and determined optimal first-line treatment strategies based on the results of previously reported pivotal trials. The consensus was reached that tumor aggressiveness and prognosis can be predicted using hepatic tumor load and Ki-67 labeling index, which are thought to be clinically important factors when selecting systemic therapy for unresectable GI-NET. SSA therapy is considered appropriate for patients with a low hepatic tumor load and low Ki-67 value and everolimus for those with contraindications to SSA therapy. There was also agreement that the treatment strategy should be determined according to whether the origin is in the midgut, considering the biological differences. Based on this strategy, the experts have tentatively created treatment maps and applied them in representative cases of unresectable GI-NET. Japanese experts proposed tentative maps for optimal first-line treatment in patients with unresectable GI-NET. Further investigation is warranted to validate the usefulness of these maps.

Cost-Effectiveness of Ibrutinib as First-line Treatment for Older Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia in Iran

ObjectivesWe aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of ibrutinib versus chemoimmunotherapy for frontline treatment of elderly patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Iran. MethodsWe developed a partitioned survival model with 3 health states (progression-free survival, post-progression survival, and death) and a lifetime horizon. State memberships were determined by parametric survival analysis of the ALLIANCE (A041202) randomized controlled trial’s results, comparing first-line ibrutinib with bendamustine plus rituximab. Direct medical costs were calculated from an Iranian health system perspective. Utility values were extracted from the literature to calculate the incremental costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) associated with each strategy. To address parameter uncertainties, deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were also performed. ResultsIn the base-case analysis, ibrutinib and bendamustine plus rituximab were associated with $3739.72 and $3991.20 costs per patient as the first-line treatment strategy, respectively. They resulted in an average of 2.86 and 2.66 QALYs per patient. Thus, first-line ibrutinib was associated with 0.20 incremental QALY and $251.48 cost-saving per patient and was therefore the “dominant” strategy. In deterministic sensitivity analysis, drug prices were the key drivers of model outputs. However, none of the resulting incremental cost-effectiveness ratios exceeded the currently accepted threshold by the Iranian Food and Drug Administration ($1550 per QALY). In probabilistic sensitivity analysis, 63.3% of iterations were cost-saving and 77.4% were cost-effective. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that ibrutinib as a first-line treatment appears to be the dominant strategy, compared with the standard of care, for unselected older adults with chronic lymphocytic leukemia in Iran.