First-Line Treatment Of Cancer Research Articles

Formulation and statistical optimization of letrozole loaded nanotransferosomal gel for tumor targeting.

Letrozole (LTZ) is used as first-line treatment for hormone-positive breast cancer (BC) in postmenopausal women. However, its poor aqueous solubility and permeability have reduced its clinical efficacy. Herein, we developed LTZ-nanotransferosomes (LTZ-NT) to address above mentioned issues. The LTZ-NT were optimized statistically using Design Expert® followed by their characterization via dynamic light scattering (DLS), Transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC). The optimized LTZ-NT was incorporated into 1% chitosan-gel to develop LTZ-NTG. Moreover, in vitro drug release and ex vivo permeation of LTZ-NTG were performed and compared with LTZ-dispersion and LTZ-NT. Additionally, skin irritability and histopathology of LTZ-NTG were investigated. Furthermore, in vitro antitumor study of LTZ-NTG was investigated in BC cell lines. The optimized LTZ-NT showed suitable zeta potential (30.4 mV), spherical size (162.5 nm) and excellent entrapment efficiency (88.04%). Moreover, LTZ-NT exhibited suitable thermal behavior and no interactions among its excipients. In addition, LTZ-NTG had an optimal pH (5.6) and a suitable viscosity. A meaningfully sustained release and improved permeation of LTZ was observed from LTZ-NTG. Additionally, LTZ-NTG showed significantly enhanced cell death of MCF-7 and MCC-7 cells. It can be concluded that LTZ-NTG has the potential to deliver chemotherapeutic agents for possible treatment of BC.

Impact of ALDH1A1 and NQO1 gene polymorphisms on the response and toxicity of chemotherapy in Bangladeshi breast cancer patients.

Cyclophosphamide, Epirubicin/Doxorubicin, 5-fluorouracil (CEF or CAF) chemotherapy has long been a standard first-line treatment for breast cancer. The genetic variations of enzymes that are responsible for the metabolism of these drugs have been linked to altered treatment response and toxicity. Two drug-metabolizing enzymes ALDH1A1 and NQO1 are critically involved in the pathways of CEF/CAF metabolism. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of ALDH1A1 (rs13959) and NQO1 (rs1800566) polymorphisms on treatment response and toxicities caused by adjuvant (ACT) and neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) where CEF/CAF combination was used to treat Bangladeshi breast cancer patients. A total of 330 patients were recruited from various hospitals, with 150 receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy and 180 receiving adjuvant chemotherapy. To extract genomic DNA, a non-enzymatic simple salting out approach was adopted. The polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism method was used to detect genetic polymorphisms. Unconditional logistic regression was used to derive odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) to study the association between genetic polymorphisms and clinical outcome and toxicity. A statistically significant association was observed between ALDH1A1 (rs13959) polymorphism and treatment response (TT vs. CC: aOR = 6.40, p = 0.007; recessive model: aOR = 6.38, p = 0.002; allele model: p = 0.032). Patients with the genotypes TT and CT + TT of the NQO1 (rs1800566) polymorphism had a significantly higher risk of toxicities such as anemia (aOR = 0.34, p = 0.006 and aOR = 0.58, p = 0.021), neutropenia (aOR = 0.42, p = 0.044 and aOR = 0.57, p = 0.027), leukopenia (aOR = 0.33, p = 0.010 and aOR = 0.46, p = 0.005), and gastrointestinal toxicity (aOR = 0.30, p = 0.02 and aOR = 0.38, p = 0.006) when compared to the wild CC genotype, while patients with the genotype CT had a significant association with gastrointestinal toxicity (aOR = 0.42, p = 0.02) and leukopenia (aOR = 0.52, p = 0.010). The TT and CT + TT genotypes of rs13959 had a significantly higher risk of anemia (aOR = 2.00, p = 0.037 and aOR = 1.68, p = 0.029). There was no significant association between rs1800566 polymorphism and treatment response. Polymorphisms in ALDH1A1 (rs13959) and NQO1 (rs1800566) may be useful in predicting the probability of treatment response and adverse effects from CEF or CAF-based chemotherapy in breast cancer patients.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of rezvilutamide versus bicalutamide in the treatment of metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer

ObjectivesThe economic implications of combining rezvilutamide with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) remain uncertain, despite the observed survival advantages compared with bicalutamide plus ADT. Therefore, this study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of...

Efficacy and safety of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer

ObjectiveTo investigate the clinical efficacy and adverse reactions of gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (AG regimen) combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). MethodsData of 52 patients with advanced PC who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Xuzhou Medical University (Xuzhou, China) between August 2019 and March 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. According to the treatment regimen, patients were divided into two groups, including 27 patients in the chemotherapy group (AG regimen) and 25 patients in the combined treatment group (AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors). Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse reactions were compared between the two groups. The survival curves of the two groups were drawn using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the differences in PFS and OS between the two groups were compared by the log-rank test. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses were performed to identify independent risk factors influencing prognosis. ResultsThe median OS and PFS in the combined treatment group were significantly longer than those in the chemotherapy group (OS, 12.8 vs. 7.9 months, P = 0.005; PFS, 5.6 vs. 4.4 months, P = 0.003). There was no significant difference in ORR between the two groups (32.0 % vs. 25.9 %, P = 0.629), and DCR in the combined treatment group was significantly better than that in the chemotherapy group (84.0 % vs. 59.3 %, P = 0.049). Grade 1–2 adverse reactions were predominant in both groups, and no adverse reaction-related deaths occurred. ConclusionCompared with chemotherapy alone, AG regimen combined with anlotinib and PD-1 inhibitors exhibited to have a higher efficacy for the first-line treatment of advanced PC, and the adverse reactions were also controllable.

Nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 versus nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer: a multicenter, randomized, phase II study.

Encouraging antitumor activity of nab-paclitaxel plus S-1 (AS) has been shown in several small-scale studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of AS versus standard-of-care nab-paclitaxel plus gemcitabine (AG) as a first-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer (PC). In this multicenter, randomized, phase II trial, eligible patients with unresectable, locally advanced, or metastatic PC were recruited and randomly assigned (1:1) to receive AS (nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; S-1 twice daily on days 1 through 14) or AG (nab-paclitaxel 125mg/m2 on days 1 and 8; gemcitabine 1000mg/m2 on days 1 and 8) for 6 cycles. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Between July 16, 2019, and September 9, 2022, 62 patients (AS, n = 32; AG, n = 30) were treated and evaluated. With a median follow-up of 8.36 months at preplanned interim analysis (data cutoff, March 24, 2023), the median PFS (8.48 vs 4.47 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.402; P = .002) and overall survival (OS; 13.73 vs 9.59 months; HR, 0.226; P < .001) in the AS group were significantly longer compared to the AG group. More patients had objective response in the AS group than AG group (37.50% vs 6.67%; P = .005). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were neutropenia and leucopenia in both groups, and gamma glutamyl transferase increase was observed only in the AG group. The first-line AS regimen significantly extended both PFS and OS of Chinese patients with advanced PC when compared with the AG regimen, with a comparable safety profile. (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03636308).

SIRT7 knockdown promotes gemcitabine sensitivity of pancreatic cancer cell via upregulation of GLUT3 expression

Gemcitabine serves as a first-line chemotherapeutic treatment for pancreatic cancer (PC), but it is prone to rapid drug resistance. Increasing the sensitivity of PC to gemcitabine has long been a focus of research. Fasting interventions may augment the effects of chemotherapy and present new options. SIRT7 is known to link metabolism with various cellular processes through post-translational modifications. We found upregulation of SIRT7 in PC cells is associated with poor prognosis and gemcitabine resistance. Cross-analysis of RNA-seq and ATAC-seq data suggested that GLUT3 might be a downstream target gene of SIRT7. Subsequent investigations demonstrated that SIRT7 directly interacts with the enhancer region of GLUT3 to desuccinylate H3K122. Our group’s another study revealed that GLUT3 can transport gemcitabine in breast cancer cells. Here, we found GLUT3 KD reduces the sensitivity of PC cells to gemcitabine, and SIRT7 KD-associated gemcitabine-sensitizing could be reversed by GLUT3 KD. While fasting mimicking induced upregulation of SIRT7 expression in PC cells, knocking down SIRT7 enhanced sensitivity to gemcitabine through upregulating GLUT3 expression. We further confirmed the effect of SIRT7 deficiency on the sensitivity of gemcitabine under fasting conditions using a mouse xenograft model. In summary, our study demonstrates that SIRT7 can regulate GLUT3 expression by binding to its enhancer and altering H3K122 succinylation levels, thus affecting gemcitabine sensitivity in PC cells. Additionally, combining SIRT7 knockdown with fasting may improve the efficacy of gemcitabine. This unveils a novel mechanism by which SIRT7 influences gemcitabine sensitivity in PC and offer innovative strategies for clinical combination therapy with gemcitabine.

An optimal combination of four active components in Huangqin decoction for the synergistic sensitization of irinotecan against colorectal cancer

BackgroundIrinotecan (CPT-11) is a first-line treatment for advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). Four components (baicalin, baicalein, wogonin, and glycyrrhizic acid) derived from Huangqin Decoction (HQD) have been proven to enhance the anticancer activity of CPT-11 in our previous study.ObjectiveThis study aimed to determine the optimal combination of the four components for sensitizing CPT-11 as well as to explore the underlying mechanism.MethodsThe orthogonal design method was applied to obtain candidate combinations (Cmb1-9) of the four components. The influence of different combinations on the anticancer effect of CPT-11 was first evaluated in vitro by cell viability, wound healing ability, cloning formation, apoptosis, and cell cycle arrest. Then, a CRC xenograft mice model was constructed to evaluate the anticancer effect of the optimal combination in vivo. Potential mechanisms of the optimal combination exerting a sensitization effect combined with CPT-11 against CRC were analyzed by targeted metabolomics.ResultsIn vitro experiments determined that Cmb8 comprised of baicalin, baicalein, wogonin, and glycyrrhizic acid at the concentrations of 17 μM, 47 μM, 46.5 μM and 9.8 μM respectively was the most effective combination. Importantly, the cell viability assay showed that Cmb8 exhibited synergistic anticancer activity in combination with CPT-11. In in vivo experiments, this combination (15 mg/kg of baicalin, 24 mg/kg of baicalein, 24 mg/kg of wogonin, and 15 mg/kg of glycyrrhizic acid) also showed a synergistic anticancer effect. Meanwhile, inflammatory factors and pathological examination of the colon showed that Cmb8 could alleviate the gastrointestinal damage induced by CPT-11. Metabolic profiling of the tumors suggested that the synergistic anticancer effect of Cmb8 might be related to the regulation of fatty acid metabolism.ConclusionThe optimal combination of four components derived from HQD for the synergistic sensitization of CPT-11 against CRC was identified.

Immunotherapy plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone as first-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

IntroductionPlatinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) has historically been the primary treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC), with limited alternative options. The therapeutic landscape experienced a paradigm shift following the results of the EV-302 and Checkmate-901 trials, which led to the approval of Enfortumab vedotin plus pembrolizumab (EV-P) as the preferred first-line treatment, and nivolumab plus CTX for those unable to receive the preferred regimen. Currently, further investigations are underway to explore PD-1 and PD-L1 inhibitors in the initial treatment of aUC. Patients and MethodsWe conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI)-CTX combinations versus CTX alone as first-line treatment for advanced UC. Employing a random-effects model, we pooled hazard ratios (HR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). ResultsOur analysis encompassed five RCTs, involving 2,162 participants, with 51.16% randomized to combination therapy with platinum-based CTX. Compared to CTX alone, immune-chemotherapy significantly improved overall survival (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.75-0.93; p < 0.01), progression-free survival (HR 0.78; 95% CI 0.70-0.86; p < 0.01), and objective response rate (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.06-1.36; p < 0.01), while elevating the risk of immune-related adverse events (p-value = 0.02). ConclusionIn this meta-analysis of RCTs, ICI plus CTX demonstrated a significant association with improved survival at the expense of an increased risk of immune-related adverse events. Therefore, our findings suggest that this combination should be considered as an initial treatment for aUC in platinum-eligible patients who cannot receive EV-P. Micro abstractThis meta-analysis investigates immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) combined with platinum-based chemotherapy (CTX) as a first-line treatment for advanced urothelial cancer (aUC). Analyzing data from three randomized controlled trials with 2,162 patients, the study demonstrates that ICI-CTX improve overall survival, progression-free survival, and response rates. These findings support the consideration of ICI-CTX as an initial treatment option for platinum-eligible aUC patients.

Locally unlocks prodrugs by radiopharmaceutical in tumor for cancer therapy

Chemotherapy is the first-line treatment for cancer, but its systemic toxicity can be severe. Tumor-selective prodrug activation offers promising opportunities to reduce systemic toxicity. Here, we present a strategy for activating prodrugs using radiopharmaceuticals. This strategy enables the targeted release of chemotherapeutic agents due to the high tumor-targeting capability of radiopharmaceuticals. [18F]FDG (2-[18F]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose), one of the most widely used radiopharmaceuticals in clinics, can trigger Pt(Ⅳ) complex for controlled release of axial ligands in tumors, it might be mediated by hydrated electrons generated by water radiolysis resulting from the decay of radionuclide 18F. Its application offers the controlled release of fluorogenic probes and prodrugs in living cells and tumor-bearing mice. Of note, an OxaliPt(Ⅳ) linker is designed to construct an [18F]FDG-activated antibody-drug conjugate (Pt-ADC). Sequential injection of Pt-ADC and [18F]FDG efficiently releases the toxin in the tumor and remarkably suppresses the tumor growth. Radiotherapy is booming as a perturbing tool for prodrug activation, and we find that [18F]FDG is capable of deprotecting various radiotherapy-removable protecting groups (RPGs). Our results suggest that tumor-selective radiopharmaceutical may function as a trigger, for developing innovative prodrug activation strategies with enhanced tumor selectivity.

A randomized phase 2 study of HLX22 plus trastuzumab biosimilar HLX02 and XELOX as first-line therapy for HER2-positive advanced gastric cancer.

Gastric cancer is the fifth most common cancer and the fourth most common cause of cancer death worldwide, yet the prognosis of advanced disease remains poor. This was a randomized, double-blinded, phase 2 trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04908813). Patients with locally advanced/metastatic HER2-positive gastric/gastroesophageal junction cancer and no prior systemic antitumor therapy were randomized 1:1:1 to 25mg/kg HLX22 (a novel anti-HER2 antibody)+ HLX02 (trastuzumab biosimilar)+ oxaliplatin and capecitabine (XELOX) (group A), 15mg/kg HLX22+ HLX02+ XELOX (group B), or placebo+ HLX02+ XELOX (group C) in 3-week cycles. Primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by independent radiological review committee (IRRC). Between November 29, 2021, and June 6, 2022, 82 patients were screened; 53 were randomized to group A (n= 18), B (n= 17), and C (n= 18). With 14.3months of median follow-up, IRRC-assessed median PFS was prolonged with the addition of HLX22 (A vs. C, 15.1 vs. 8.2months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.5 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.17-1.27]; B vs. C, not reached vs. 8.2months, HR 0.1 [95% CI 0.04-0.52]). Confirmed ORR was comparable among groups (A vs. B vs. C, 77.8% vs. 82.4% vs. 88.9%). Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 18 (100%), 16 (94.1%), and 17 (94.4%) patients, respectively. One (5.6%) patient in group C reported a grade 5 TRAE. Adding HLX22 to HLX02 and XELOX prolonged PFS and enhanced antitumor response in the first-line treatment of HER2-positive gastric cancer, with manageable safety. Shanghai Henlius Biotech, Inc.

Efficacy of first-line chemotherapy based on primary site of tumor versus etoposide-platinum in advanced gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinoma.

Gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine carcinomas (GEP-NECs) constitute a rare and aggressive group of malignancies usually with widespread disease. There are limited studies on GEP-NECs, and therefore, we aim to acquire more information on the clinical features, treatment regimens, and prognosis. Data from advanced GEP-NECs patients who had not previously received systemic treatment for advanced disease at The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University from 2010 to 2022 were retrospectively collected. Relationships between clinical-pathological features, treatment regimens, and prognosis were investigated using Kaplan-Meier curves and cox regression models. A total of fifty-four patients were enrolled in the study. The median age was 65.5 years and 79.6% were male. At diagnosis, 51.9% and 3.7% of patients developed liver and brain metastasis respectively. Sixteen (29.6%) patients received chemotherapy according to primary site of tumor (PST), while thirty-eight (70.4%) were treated with etoposide-platinum (EP) regimen, which based on the first-line treatment of advanced small cell lung cancer (SCLC). No significant differences on progression-free survival (PFS) and response rate were observed between these two groups. Univariate survival analysis showed that liver metastasis, elevated baseline serum carcinoembryonic antigen, elevated baseline serum neuron-specific enolase, elevated baseline serum lactate dehydrogenase, and elevated baseline serum neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) were associated with shorter PFS. After multivariate analysis, elevated NLR was the only factor that remained significantly associated with shorter PFS (P=0.01). GEP-NECs are aggressive neoplasms, of which elevated NLR is proven to be an independent negative predictor. Treatment regimens based on PST are not inferior to regiments based on SCLC (EP) for GEP-NECs patients. Large-scale, prospective randomized controlled trials are required to establish the standard of care.

Advancements in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Bladder Cancer: EV-302 and Checkmate-901 Insights and Future Directions.

Advanced bladder cancer patients have historically failed to achieve prolonged duration of response to conventional chemotherapy and needed better first-line treatment regimens. The approval of nivolumab in combination with gemcitabine and cisplatin and pembrolizumab with antibody-drug conjugate enfortumab vedotin has revolutionized the first-line treatment of advanced bladder cancer in many countries. In this review, we summarize the intricate differences between the two landmark clinical trials that led to their incorporation into the current standard of care for advanced bladder cancer. We further discuss newer novel treatment options in the second and subsequent lines of treatment on progression, like immunotherapy in combination with other agents, including fibroblast growth factors receptor inhibitors, human epidermal growth factor inhibitors, antibody-drug conjugates, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and novel antibodies. Finally, we discuss the integration of these novel therapies into current clinical practice amidst the rapidly evolving landscape of advanced bladder cancer treatment, aiming to enhance patient outcomes.

Advances in targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 positive in advanced gastric cancer.

Emerging therapeutic methods represented by targeted therapy are effective supplements to traditional first-line chemoradiotherapy resistance. Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) is one of the most important targets in targeted therapy for gastric cancer. Trastuzumab combined with chemotherapy has been used as the first-line treatment for advanced gastric cancer. The safety and efficacy of pertuzumab and margetuximab in the treatment of gastric cancer have been verified. However, monoclonal antibodies, due to their large molecular weight, inability to penetrate the blood-brain barrier, and drug resistance, lead to decreased therapeutic efficacy, so it is necessary to explore the efficacy of other HER2-targeting therapies in gastric cancer. Small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors, such as lapatinib and pyrrotinib, have the advantages of small molecular weight, penetrating the blood-brain barrier and high oral bioavailability, and are expected to become the drugs of choice for perioperative treatment and neoadjuvant therapy of gastric cancer after validation by large-scale clinical trials in the future. Antibo-drug conjugate, such as T-DM1 and T-DXd, can overcome the resistance of monoclonal antibodies despite their different mechanisms of tumor killing, and are a supplement for the treatment of patients who have failed the treatment of monoclonal antibodies such as trastuzumab. Therefore, after more detailed stratification of gastric cancer patients, various gastric cancer drugs targeting HER2 are expected to play a more significant role.

The Combination of Gefitinib and Acetaminophen Exacerbates Hepatotoxicity via ROS-Mediated Apoptosis.

Gefitinib is the well-tolerated first-line treatment of non-small cell lung cancer. As it need for analgesics during oncology treatment, particularly in the context ofthe coronavirus disease, where patients are more susceptible to contract high fever and sore throat. This has increased the likelihood of taking both gefitinib and antipyretic analgesic acetaminophen (APAP). Given that gefitinib and APAP overdose can predispose patients to liver injury or even acute liver failure, there is a risk of severe hepatotoxicity when these two drugs are used concomitantly. However, little is known regarding their safety at therapeutic doses. This study simulated the administration of gefitinib and APAP at clinically relevant doses in an animal model and confirmed that gefitinib in combination with APAP exhibited additional hepatotoxicity. We found that gefitinib plus APAP significantly exacerbated cell death, whereas each drug by itself had little or minor effect on hepatocyte survival. Mechanistically, combination of gefitinib and APAP induces hepatocyte death via the apoptotic pathway obviously. Reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and DNA damage accumulation are involved in hepatocyte apoptosis. Gefitinib plus APAP also promotes the expression of Kelch-like ECH-associated protein 1 (Keap1) and downregulated the antioxidant factor, Nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (Nrf2), by inhibiting p62 expression. Taken together, this study revealed the potential ROS-mediated apoptosis-dependent hepatotoxicity effect of the combination of gefitinib and APAP, in which the p62/Keap1/Nrf2 signaling pathway participates and plays an important regulatory role.

Refractory bullous pemphigoid during treatment with pembrolizumab in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Refractory bullous pemphigoid during treatment with pembrolizumab in the first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Integrated analysis reveals a novel 5-fluorouracil resistance-based prognostic signature with promising implications for predicting the efficacy of chemotherapy and immunotherapy in patients with colorectal cancer.

5-Fluorouracil (5-FU) has been used as a standard first-line treatment for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Although 5-FU-based chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) have achieved success in treating CRC, drug resistance and low response rates remain substantial limitations. Thus, it is necessary to construct a 5-FU resistance-related signature (5-FRSig) to predict patient prognosis and identify ideal patients for chemotherapy and immunotherapy. Using bulk and single-cell RNA sequencing data, we established and validated a novel 5-FRSig model using stepwise regression and multiple CRC cohorts and evaluated its associations with the prognosis, clinical features, immune status, immunotherapy, neoadjuvant therapy, and drug sensitivity of CRC patients through various bioinformatics algorithms. Unsupervised consensus clustering was performed to categorize the 5-FU resistance-related molecular subtypes of CRC. The expression levels of 5-FRSig, immune checkpoints, and immunoregulators were determined using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT‒qPCR). Potential small-molecule agents were identified via Connectivity Map (CMap) and molecular docking. The 5-FRSig and cluster were confirmed as independent prognostic factors in CRC, as patients in the low-risk group and Cluster 1 had a better prognosis. Notably, 5-FRSig was significantly associated with 5-FU sensitivity, chemotherapy response, immune cell infiltration, immunoreactivity phenotype, immunotherapy efficiency, and drug selection. We predicted 10 potential compounds that bind to the core targets of 5-FRSig with the highest affinity. We developed a valid 5-FRSig to predict the prognosis, chemotherapeutic response, and immune status of CRC patients, thus optimizing the therapeutic benefits of chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy, which can facilitate the development of personalized treatments and novel molecular targeted therapies for patients with CRC.

Efficacy and safety of surufatinib, toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel in combination with radiotherapy or surgery in the first-line treatment of esophageal squamous cell cancer: A single-centered prospective clinical trial.

e16047 Background: Chemotherapy(CT) plus immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has become the current standard of care in the first-line treatment of metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer(ESCC). In locally advanced setting, radiochemotherapy with or without resection remains the standard of care. Surufatinib, a novel small-molecule kinase inhibitor targeting VEGFR1-3, FGFR and CSF-1R, in combination with PD-1 inhibitors have demonstrated synergistic anti-tumor activities in previous studies. This single-centered prospective clinical trial aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of surufatinib(SUR), toripalimab(TOR), nab-paclitaxel(NAB) in combination with radiotherapy or surgery in the first-line treatment of locally advanced(LA) or metastatic(R/M) ESCC. Methods: Eligible patients(pts) with confirmed LA or R/M, ECOG PS 0-2 and no prior systematic treatment were enrolled in the trial. Pts would receive 260mg/m2 NAB and TOR 240mg on day 1 and SUR 250mg once daily in each 21-day cycle as induction therapy for two cycles, followed by surgery or another two cycles of concurrent chemoradiotherapy(CCRT) with NAB, SUR and radiotherapy, in which involved-field irradiation were conducted at the dose of 50-63 Gy/25-30F, 1.8-2 Gy per fraction, 5 fractions per week. As maintenance therapy, daily SUR and TOR every three week were administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary endpoint. Results: As of Jan 7, 2024, 16 pts were enrolled, of whom 15 were evaluable. 14(87.5%) pts were male. The median age was 69.5 (range: 45-79). Tumor located in upper(18.8%), middle(25%) and lower(56.2%) thoracic. 1(6.2%) is Stage II disease, 12(75%) Stage III and 3(18.8%) Stage IV. 8 (50%) pts were with PD-L1 CPS greater than 1, 5 (31.25%) pts greater than 5, and 3 (18.75%) pts greater than 10. PD-L1 CPS of 6(37.50%) pts was unknown. With a median follow-up time of 5 (range: 1-12) months, despite the immatureness of PFS, the 12-month PFS rate was 77.14% (95% CI: 48.89%-100%). The objective response rate was 93.3% (14/15), and disease control rate was 100% (15/15). Five of the included pts met the resection criteria during treatment and underwent subsequent R0 resection. The most common adverse events (≥20%) of all grades were hypoesthesia (62.5%), nausea and vomiting (50%), and white blood cell decrease (43.75%). Conclusions: The combination ofsurufatinib, toripalimab, nab-paclitaxel with radiotherapy or surgery has demonstrated promising efficacy and a well-tolerated safety profile as a potential first-line treatment for LA or R/M ESCC. This ongoing trial merits further investigation and holds significant implications for clinical practice.

Prognostic analysis of PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody combined with chemotherapy first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer: A multicenter real-world study.

e17520 Background: PD-1/CTLA-4 bispecific antibody, cadonilimab, has shown excellent efficacy in advanced cervical cancer patients who have previously received platinum containing chemotherapy. However, its effectiveness in first-line treatment remains unclear yet. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and prognostic biomarker of cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy for the first line treatment of recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer. Methods: Information on patients with recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer who received chemotherapy combined with cadonilimab as first-line treatment at three cancer centers from July 2022 to September 2023 were collected. Patients have not received systemic chemotherapy previously and are not suitable for curative local treatment, received cadonilimab 10mg/kg Q3W for up to 17 cycles + chemotherapy for up to 6 cycles (paclitaxel 135-175 mg/m2 + cisplatin 50 mg/m2 or carboplatin AUC 5), ± bevacizumab 10-15 mg/kg. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan–Meier method with log-rank test. RNA-seq was used to analyze differential expressed genes (DEGs) between PR+CR group and PD+SD group. Results: There are 52 patients enrolled, median age 56.5 years (39–87 years). The median follow-up time was 12 months (5–23 months). There were 29 cases of lung metastasis, 7 cases of liver metastasis, 11 cases of bone metastasis, 12 cases of pelvic metastasis, and 11 cases of lymph node metastasis. The median number of cycles of cadonilimab and chemotherapy were 8 and 5, respectively. The 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 91% and 72.5%, respectively. The objective response rate (ORR) was 75%.The expression of PD-L1 and bevacizumab had no effect on prognosis. The most common treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were neutropenia (78.2%), anemia (82.7%), thrombocytopenia (51.9%), thyroid dysfunction (50%), nausea and vomiting (88.5%), fatigue (71.2%). Grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AE) were reported in 36.5% patients, mainly hematological toxicity. The most significant differential pathways between PR+CR group and PD+SD group were adhesion, Hippo signaling pathway, NOD like receptor signaling pathway, programmed cell death, and secretory granules. Conclusions: Cadonilimab combined with chemotherapy ± bevacizumab as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic cervical cancer was effective and well-tolerant.

Comparative efficacy of six programmed cell death protein-1 inhibitors in first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A retrospective cohort study.

e14702 Background: All six programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) inhibitors (nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab) have been used as first-line therapy in Chinese patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but the comparative efficacy of these different drugs remains unclear. Methods: Retrospective collection of patient data from the First, Third, and Fifth Medical Centers of the Chinese PLA General Hospital who received PD-1 inhibitors (monotherapy or combination therapy) from June 2015 to April 2023. Analysis of patient clinical characteristics, treatment response, and survival outcomes was conducted, with the primary endpoints being overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints include objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR). Results: 913 patients were included and divided into 6 groups: nivolumab (123, 13.5%), pembrolizumab (421, 46.1%), sintilimab (239, 26.1%), tislelizumab (64, 7.0%), toripalimab (39, 4.3%), and camrelizumab (27, 3.0%). Median PFS was 16.0, 16.1, 18.4, 16.9, 23.7, and 12.8 months, and median OS was 33.7, 36.1, 32.5, not reached, 30.9, and 46.0 months for the nivolumab, sintilimab, pembrolizumab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab groups, respectively. PFS and OS did not differ among the different PD-1 inhibitor groups (all P&gt;0.05). There were differences in ORR among the different PD-1 inhibitors (P&lt;0.05), but no differences in DCR (P&gt;0.05). Conclusions: Nivolumab, pembrolizumab, sintilimab, tislelizumab, toripalimab, and camrelizumab exhibit similar efficacy in first-line treatment for patients with advanced NSCLC.

A phase I/II open label study to assess safety and preliminary evidence of a therapeutic effect of azeliragon in patients refractory to first-line treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

TPS4212 Background: Azeliragon is an orally administered small molecule, administered once daily, that inhibits RAGE interactions with its natural ligands, including HMGB1 and S100 proteins. Azeliragon was previously under development for Alzheimer’s disease and failed to show efficacy in phase 3 trials. Clinical safety data from these trials, with over 1500 individuals dosed for periods up to 18 months, indicated that azeliragon has a high level of safety and tolerability, virtually indistinguishable from placebo. RAGE, the receptor for advanced glycation end products, is highly expressed in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). RAGE interaction with its ligands, including S100 proteins and HMGB1 released from PDAC cells, promotes PDAC invasion, metastasis, and resistance to 5 FU and Gemcitabine. PDAC-secreted S100 proteins can also stimulate fibroblasts surrounding PDAC cells since RAGE is positively expressed in fibroblasts, promoting the desmoplastic response. RAGE has also been implicated in the muscle wasting associated with cancer and with aging, as well as in neuropathic pain, suggesting a potential supportive role in PDAC treatment. Methods: This is an open label study to determine the safety and preliminary evidence of a therapeutic effect of azeliragon in patients refractory to the standard of care treatment of metastatic pancreatic cancer. Azeliragon is administered at three dose levels in a rolling dose escalation strategy with 6 patients at each dose level: 5 mg/day (level 1), 10 mg/day (level 2) and 20 mg/day (level 3). These dose levels have an initial loading dose for 6 days at 15 mg daily, 15 mg twice a day and 30 mg twice a day, respectively. The primary objective is to determine the RP2D, defined as the dose for which &lt;33% patients experience a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) within 28 days from initiation of dosing. Secondary endpoints include disease control, overall survival, changes in pain as determined by the Brief Pain Inventory, and changes in ECOG performance status, weight, and serum albumin. The study received regulatory approval and accrual started in June 2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05766748 .