First-line Treatment For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Articles

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CHANCE2201): a target trial emulation study

The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unconfirmed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included advanced HCC patients receiving either TACE with ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (TACE-ICI-VEGF) or only ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (ICI-VEGF) from January 2018 to December 2022. The study design followed the target trial emulation framework with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) to minimize biases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05332821. Among 1244 patients included in the analysis, 802 (64.5%) patients received TACE-ICI-VEGF treatment, and 442 (35.5%) patients received ICI-VEGF treatment. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months and 20.6 months, respectively. Post-application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. TACE-ICI-VEGF group exhibited a significantly improved median OS (22.6 months [95% CI: 21.2-23.9] vs 15.9 months [14.9-17.8]; P<0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.75]). Median PFS was also longer in TACE-ICI-VEGF group (9.9 months [9.1-10.6] vs 7.4 months [6.7-8.5]; P<0.0001; aHR 0.74 [0.65-0.85]) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. A higher ORR was observed in TACE-ICI-VEGF group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (41.2% vs 22.9%, P<0.0001; 47.3% vs 29.7%, P<0.0001). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 178 patients (22.2%) in TACE-ICI-VEGF group and 80 patients (18.1%) in ICI-VEGF group. This multicenter study supports the use of TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Nanjing Life Health Science and Technology Project.

Toripalimab Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.

This phase II, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus bevacizumab in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment-naïve patients with advanced HCC received toripalimab 240 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. Primary endpoints included safety and tolerability, and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Fifty-four patients were enrolled between Apr 17, 2020 and Dec 11, 2020. As assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5-45.6] and the lower bound of the 95% CI was above the pre-specified boundary of 10%. The independent review committee (IRC) assessed ORR according to modified RECIST (mRECIST) was 46.3% (95% CI, 32.6-60.4). The median progression-free survival were 8.5 months (95% CI, 5.5-11.0) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.6-not evaluable) assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 and IRC according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the 12- and 24-month OS rates were 77.3% and 63.5%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 27 patients (50.0%). The most common TEAEs were proteinuria (59.3%), hypertension (38.9%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (33.3%), amylase increased (29.6%), platelet count decreased (27.8%), and bilirubin increased (27.8%). Toripalimab plus bevacizumab showed a favorable efficacy and safety profile, supporting further studies of this combination regimen as a first-line treatment of advanced HCC.

The long-term efficacy and safety of apatinib are inferior to sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Apatinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor independently developed by China, has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years. For more than a decade, sorafenib has been the classic first-line treatment option for patients with advanced HCC. However, the results of clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs are still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Up to August 14, 2023, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies of experimental group (apatinib or apatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) versus control group (sorafenib or sorafenib plus TACE) in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC were included. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. A total of 12 studies involving 1150 patients were included. Five studies are apatinib alone versus sorafenib alone, and the other 7 studies are apatinib plus TACE versus sorafenib plus TACE. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with sorafenib alone, apatinib could improve (OR = 3.06, 95%CI: 1.76-5.31), had no advantage in improving DCR (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 0.86-2.68) and prolonging PFS (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.94-1.96), and was significantly worse in prolonging OS (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08-1.88). Similarly, apatinib plus TACE was inferior to sorafenib plus TACE in prolonging OS (HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.03-1.28), although it improved ORR (OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.03-2.16). In terms of adverse drug events, the overall incidence of adverse events, and the incidence of drug reduction and discontinuation in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, and oral mucositis in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < .05). In the setting of first-line treatment of advanced HCC, apatinib has improved short-term efficacy (ORR) compared with sorafenib, but the safety and long-term efficacy of apatinib are inferior to sorafenib.

Lenvatinib combined with sintilimab plus transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Recently, combination therapy has shown a better trend towards improved tumour response and survival outcomes than monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, research on triple therapy [lenvatinib + sintilimab + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)] as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC is limited. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple therapy as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C treated with triple therapy were enrolled. All patients were treated with lenvatinib every day and sintilimab once every 3 wk. Moreover, TACE was performed every 4-6 wk if necessary. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and incidence of adverse events. Forty HCC patients who underwent triple therapy were retrospectively analysed from January 2019 to January 2022. With a median follow-up of 8.5 months, the 3-, 6-, and 12-mo OS rates were 100%, 88.5%, and 22.5%, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 45% and 90%, respectively. The median progressive free survival and median OS were not reached. Common complications were observed in 76% of the patients (grade 3, 15%; grade 4, 2.5%). Combination therapy comprising lenvatinib, sintilimab and TACE achieved promising outcomes in advanced HCC patients and had manageable effects.

Prognostic biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly advanced HCC, has been a serious challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are landmark drugs in the field of cancer therapy in recent years, which have changed the landscape of cancer treatment. In the field of HCC treatment, this class of drugs has shown good therapeutic prospects. For example, atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced HCC due to significant efficacy. However, sensitivity to ICI therapy varies widely among HCC patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to search for determinants of resistance/sensitivity to ICIs and to screen biomarkers that can predict the efficacy of ICIs. This manuscript reviews the research progress of prognostic biomarkers associated with ICIs in HCC in order to provide a scientific basis for the development of clinically individualised precision medication regimens.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Purpose: Results from the LAUNCH trial suggest transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with lenvatinib is significantly more effective than lenvatinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the cost of TACE is substantial. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of TACE in combination with lenvatinib (TACE-LEN) with that of lenvatinib alone as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: Markov models of different health states were constructed to simulate first-line treatment, disease progression, and survival in patients with advanced HCC. Clinical efficacy was obtained from the LAUNCH trial. The cost of drugs was sourced from national tender prices, and the treatment cost of weight-decreased was obtained from the Fujian Provincial Bureau of Prices. Other costs and utility values were based on the published literature. Total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) comprised the model output. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate model robustness and subgroup analyses were also conducted. Results: Analysis of the model showed that compared to lenvatinib, TACE-LEN improved effectiveness by 1.60 QALYs at a total cost increase of $48,874.69, with an ICER value of $30,482.13/QALY. A one-way sensitivity analysis found that the progression-free survival utility value per year had the greatest impact on the model. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that TACE-LEN had a 97.9% probability of being cost-effective as the first-line treatment option for advanced HCC compared to lenvatinib when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) value was $38,201/QALY (three times the Chinese GDP per capita in 2022). Subgroup analysis showed that all subgroups of patients preferred TACE-LEN. However, when the WTP threshold was below $30,300/QALY, TACE-LEN is no longer cost-effective. Conclusion: Our study found TACE-LEN to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC compared to lenvatinib from a Chinese healthcare system perspective, but not so in low-income provinces in China.

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nivolumab improves overall survival (OS) and is associated with less adverse events (AE) compared with sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). But which approach is the most cost-effective remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab vs sorafenib as first-line therapy for patients with advanced HCC from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. A partitioned survival mode was constructed to evaluate the health and economic outcomes of nivolumab vs sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The clinical data and outcomes were obtained from CheckMate 459 trial. Medical costs and utilities were collected from published sources. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to examine model uncertainty. Additional subgroup and scenario analyses were performed. Treatment with nivolumab yielded an additional 0.27 QALYs with an incremental cost of $65,579.19 compared with sorafenib, leading to an ICER of $236,765.93/QALY in China. One-way sensitivity analysis found the model outputs to be most affected for hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the cost of nivolumab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of nivolumab being cost-effective was 0% at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,201.19/QALY. The scenario analyses indicated altering the time horizon of the model did not reverse the economic results. Nivolumab as first-line treatment could gain more health benefits for advanced HCC compared with sorafenib, but was estimated not to be cost-effective at the commonly adopted WTP threshold of China.

Immune-Based Combination Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. HCC frequently presents as advanced disease at diagnosis, and disease relapse following radical surgery is frequent. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC, particularly with the introduction of atezolizumab/bevacizumab as the new standard of care for first-line treatment. Recently, dual immune checkpoint blockade with durvalumab plus tremelimumab has also emerged as an effective first-line treatment for advanced HCC and most of the research is currently focused on developing combination treatments based mainly on ICIs. In this review, we will discuss the rationale and ongoing clinical trials of immune-based combination therapies for the treatment of advanced HCC, also focusing on new immunotherapy strategies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and anti-cancer vaccines.

Identification of immune-related target and prognostic biomarkers in PBMC of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and is characterized by insidious onset, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy is a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The identification of immune-related prognostic markers may be an effective strategy to predict and improve clinical response rate of immunotherapy.Methods The DESeq2, edgeR, and limma R packages were used to compare the transcriptomes of HCC with different prognoses. Cancer-related databases such as UALCAN, TNMplot, GEPIA, muttarget and Human Protein Atlas (HPA), and the Kaplan–Meier Plotter platform were used to analyze the relationship between CLDN18 and the clinical characteristics, as well as prognosis of HCC. The co-expressed genes of CLDN18 were obtained from LinkedOmics platform, and GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were performed. The CIBERSORT, TIMER, Timer 2.0 and TISIDB algorithms were used to analyze immune infiltration.Results CLDN18 was differentially expressed in HCC patients with different prognoses, and its expression level in PBMC was positively correlated with the stage of BCLC. In addition, CLDN18 was significantly overexpressed in HCC tumor tissues compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues, which was consistent with PBMC sequencing results and immunohistochemical data from human protein profiles. CLDN18 was also positively correlated with HCC staging and grading, and high expression levels of CLDN18 predicted shorter overall survival. Functional annotation of CLDN18 in HCC revealed enrichment of the cellular senescence and protein activation cascade, along with biological processes such as cell cycle, inflammatory response, and cellular ketone metabolism. In addition, CLDN18 was also associated with tumor infiltrating immune cells, suppressive immune cell markers, T lymphocyte depletion and activation of HCC, and low expression of CLDN18 was associated with higher CD8 + T cell infiltration and better survival rates.ConclusionsCLDN18 is a potential prognostic marker and immunotherapeutic target for HCC.

Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis: analysis of factors prognostic of clinical outcomes.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TACE and factors predicting survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS). This single-center retrospective study included 236 treatment-naïve patients who underwent TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC without MVI or EHS between January 2007 and December 2021. Following TACE, the median overall survival (OS) was 24 months. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that tumor number ≥4 (risk point: 3), maximal tumor size >10cm (risk point: 2), Child-Pugh class B (risk point: 2), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration ≥400 ng/mL (risk point: 2), and presence of HCC rupture (risk point: 2) were risk factors significantly associated with OS. The expected median OS among patients with <2, 2-4, and 5-9 risk points were 72, 29, and 12 months respectively. The major complication rates were significantly lower in patients with maximal tumor size ≤10 cm than in those with maximal tumor size >10cm (4% [5/138] vs 21% [21/98], p = 0.001). TACE may be safe and effective in selected patients with advanced HCC without MVI or EHS, with a median OS of 24 months. Patients with limited tumor burden, compensated liver function, absence of HCC rupture, and favorable biologic markers may benefit the most from TACE. TACE is not recommended for patients with huge HCCs (>10cm) because of its high rate of major complications (21%).

A prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study of tislelizumab in combination with lenvatinib for perioperative treatment of resectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma with high risk of recurrence.

e16218 Background: Surgery is the main radical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the high postoperative recurrence rate makes the survival benefit of patients limited. Neoadjuvant therapy mainly reduces postoperative recurrence by controlling micrometastasis and reducing preoperative tumor load and other high recurrence risk factors, but there are limited data on its application in liver cancer. Tislelizumab, a PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has shown promising efficacy with acceptable safety profile in combination with lenvatinib in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of tislelizumab combined with lenvatinib in the neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant therapy of resectable HCC. Methods: This prospective, single-center, single-arm phase II study (NCT04834986) enrolled patients with histologically confirmed resectable HCC who were at high risk of recurrence, as assessed by the investigators before surgery. Patients did not have any medical treatment in the past, with ECOG of 0-1, and had adequate organ and bone marrow function. Eligible patients received 4 cycles with tislelizumab (200mg, d1, Q3W) combined with Lenvatinib (8mg/kg, PO, qd) and surgery was performed within 4 weeks after treatment. At 4-8 weeks after surgery, adjuvant therapy was started with tislelizumab (200mg, d1, Q3W) and lenvatinib (8mg/kg, PO, qd) for at least half a year or until disease progression or intolerance of adverse reactions. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility; secondary endpoints were ORR, 1 and 2-years DFS%, pCR, and DFS. Results: From Sep 7,2021 to Nov 9,2022, 24 patients (median age, 57.5 years) were enrolled, with most patients were males (95.8%) and 22 patients (91.7%) had HBV infection. All patients had Child-Pugh grade A and ECOG PS 0. The median treatment period was 4 cycles. In 24 patients, 17 patients (70.8%) underwent R0 resection, 3 patients (3/17, 17.6%) achieved complete pathological response (PCR), and 6 patients (6/17, 35.3%) achieved major pathological response rate (MPR, necrosis &gt; 70%). 3 patients (12.5%) had significant tumor shrinkage and refused surgery. 1 patient (4.2%) is waiting surgery. 3 patients (12.5%) developed disease progression. According to RECIST1.1, ORR was 54.2% (13/24, CR 1, PR 12), DCR was 87.5%. According to mRECIST, ORR was 75.0% (18/24, CR 6, PR 12), DCR was 87.5%. No grade 3 or above adverse events were observed during neoadjuvant treatment period. The most common adverse events of any grade were rash (14/24,58.3%), hypertension (5/24,20.8%) and diarrhea (4/24,16.7%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab in combination with lenvatinib was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy as a neoadjuvant therapy for resectable HCC with high risk of recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT04834986 .

Real-world data: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in Veteran Health Administration.

2651 Background: Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor, and most patients have a poor prognosis. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated improved survival with molecularly targeted treatment and immunotherapy. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (A+B ) is the recommended first-line treatment for advanced HCC based on the phase 3 IMbrave 150 trial. However, in a real-life setting, many patients do not meet the inclusion criteria of this landmark trial. This study proposes a retrospective review of outcomes of advanced HCC patients receiving A + B in Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods: Patients with advanced HCC receiving 1st line systemic therapy with A+ B at the VHA between Dec 1, 2019, to Mar 1, 2022, were selected from the electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Abstractors reviewed EMR and followed from their index date of A+ B initiation until death or their last VHA visit, with the study period ending on Jan 31, 2023. The Chi-Squared test was used to compare rates, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare medians. Results: A total of 332 patients met the study criteria. The median age was 67 yrs., 99% were males, 63% non-Hispanic White, 26% were Black, 66 % had ECOG ≥ 1, 84% had CPS class A, 16% had CPS class B and C, 62% had grade 2 ALBI score, 56% had viral hepatitis-caused HCC, 80 % had cirrhosis, and 67% had prior local therapies. The outcomes are shown. Conclusions: In our real world, despite having similar PFS as the phase 3 IMbrave 150 trial, our OS at 12 months was lower (52% vs. 67%), given that we had more elderly patients with moderate liver dysfunction and 40% were non-white. This study provides actual outcomes in clinical practice where patients do not match the study population of the pivotal trial. [Table: see text]

Abstract 1281: Oncoprotein YB-1 modulation of Lyn-MAPK-NF-kB pathway, a potential therapeutic strategy combined with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC

Abstract The Y-Box Binding protein 1 (YB-1) is a 324 amino acid-long member of the Cold Shock Domain (CSD) protein superfamily. YB-1 interacts with micro RNAs and non-coding RNAs in the cytoplasm, acting as a regulator of mRNA translation. YB-1 translocation into the nucleus is circadian clock-dependent and leads to the upregulation of cyclin gene expression, among others. Another mechanism of nuclear translocation of YB-1 is mediated by phosphorylation of the Ser 102 residue in the CSD. The YB-1 oncoprotein acts as a transcription factor when bound to DNA, modulating the transcription of genes that regulate biological processes such as Multidrug Resistance Mutation 1 (MDR1). YB-1 is linked to poor prognosis in breast, prostate, and liver cancer. Despite advances in biomedicine, the incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain high. Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase Inhibitor (TKI), is the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Sorafenib also inhibits downstream activation of NF-kB by inhibition of Lyn phosphorylation (Y397). However, it was observed in many patients that its sorafenib’s effectiveness is hampered by drug resistance, but the mechanism is still unclear. We have found that SK-HEP-1 HCC cells transfected with a YB-X-1 overexpression plasmid subsequently developed into a stable YB-1 overexpression cell line (SK-HEP-1+YB-1) displayed increased invasion, migration, proliferation, and colony formation property as compared to the vector control (SKHEP1+Vec). The SK-HEP-1+YB-1 cell line also showed increased IC50 for sorafenib and elevated phosphorylation of Lyn (Y397) and further activated NF-kB (S165/S176) phosphorylation. This indicates YB-1 may cause increased Sorafenib resistance in HCC by activating tyrosine kinases (TK), such as lyn, and simultaneous activation of NF-kB. The combination of YB-1 inhibition and sorafenib might provide a novel therapeutic strategy and improve the survival of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Citation Format: Ana G. Ayala Pazzi, Omar Karkoutly, Kristopher Ezell, Samantha Lopez, Kyle D. Doxtater, Elias George, Vijian Dhevan, Manish K. Tripathi. Oncoprotein YB-1 modulation of Lyn-MAPK-NF-kB pathway, a potential therapeutic strategy combined with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1281.

Abstract 4145: Frizzled-4 expression enhances hepatocellular carcinoma progression, sorafenib resistance and suppresses anti-tumor CD8 T cell immunity

Abstract Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most common and deadliest cancers. Sorafenib remains the globally accepted systemic first-line treatment for advanced HCC although acquired drug-resistance is becoming increasingly common. Hopefully, immune-checkpoint inhibitor therapy has recently revolutionized the treatment for advanced HCC that have poor response to sorafenib, but the durable response rate remains low in most patients for unknown reasons. This fuels a wave of research into the molecular mechanisms of tumor-intrinsic resistance to both chemotherapy and immune checkpoint blockade (ICB), which may provide potential systemic treatment options for advanced HCC patients. Methods and Results: RNA sequencing of sorafenib-resistant HCC cell lines was performed to identify Frizzled-4 (FZD4) as a critical gene for drug resistance that was further validated in animal models. Clinical implication of FZD4 overexpression was studied in HCC patients. Using genetic and pharmacological approaches, we found that FZD4 was sufficient to increase clonogenicity, migration and invasion, and prevent sorafenib-induced apoptosis. In addition, FZD4 could reduce secretion of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interferon-gamma (IFN-γ), as well as intracellular levels of cytotoxic granzyme A and perforin in CD8+ T cells, indicating significant suppression of CD8+ T cell-mediated antitumor immunity in HCC tumors. In vivo studies also revealed that FZD4 expression promoted tumorigenesis and accelerated HCC cell metastatic lung colonization. Combination therapy of FZD4 inhibitor FzM1 with sorafenib in HCC of MYC/sgp53-induced model showed a tendency to significantly impede tumor growth and improve mice survival. Moreover, gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) identified the cholesterol homeostasis and fatty acid metabolism signaling signatures as the top activated pathways in FZD4-high HCC cells. This evidence suggests a crucial role of FZD4-involved lipid metabolism linked to the development of therapeutic resistance. Conclusion: Our study demonstrates that FZD4 expression plays a pivotal role in HCC progression and holds the potential for expanding the scope of targeted/ICB therapies to tumors that are currently unresponsive, especially in advanced HCC. The resistance mechanisms will be addressed in further work. Citation Format: Jie Luo, Lanqi Gong, Yuma Yang, Qin Liu, Jiao Huang, Xiaona Fang, Xin-Yuan Guan. Frizzled-4 expression enhances hepatocellular carcinoma progression, sorafenib resistance and suppresses anti-tumor CD8 T cell immunity. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 4145.

Anti-CD122 antibody restores specific CD8+ T cell response in nonalcoholic steatohepatitis and prevents hepatocellular carcinoma growth

ABSTRACT Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) can lead to hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Although immunotherapy is used as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, the impact of NASH on anticancer immunity is only partially characterized. We assessed the tumor-specific T cell immune response in the context of NASH. In a mouse model of NASH, we observed an expansion of the CD44+CXCR6+PD-1+CD8+ T cells in the liver. After intra-hepatic injection of RIL-175-LV-OVA-GFP HCC cells, NASH mice had a higher percentage of peripheral OVA-specific CD8+ T cells than control mice, but these cells did not prevent HCC growth. In the tumor, the expression of PD-1 on OVA-specific CD44+CXCR6+CD8+ cells was higher in NASH mice suggesting lowered immune activity. Treating mice with an anti-CD122 antibody, which reduced the number of CXCR6+PD-1+ cells, we restored OVA-specific CD8 activity, and reduced HCC growth compared to untreated NASH mice. Human dataset confirmed that NASH-affected livers, NASH tissues adjacent to HCC and HCC in patients with NASH exhibited gene expression patterns supporting mouse observations. Our findings demonstrate the immune system fails to prevent HCC growth in NASH, primarily linked to a higher representation of CD44+CXCR6+PD-1+CD8+ T cells. Treatment with an anti-CD122 antibody reduces the number of these cells and prevents HCC growth.

Immune landscape and immunotherapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: focus on innate and adaptive immune cells.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is responsible for roughly 90% of all cases of primary liver cancer, and the cases are on the rise. The treatment of advanced HCC is a serious challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has marked a watershed moment in the history of HCC systemic treatment. Atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has been approved as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC since 2020; however, the combination therapy is only effective in a limited percentage of patients. Considering that the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) has a great impact on immunotherapies for HCC, an in-depth understanding of the immune landscape in tumors and the current immunotherapeutic approaches is extremely necessary. We elaborate on the features, functions, and cross talk of the innate and adaptive immune cells in HCC and highlight the benefits and drawbacks of various immunotherapies for advanced HCC, as well as future projections. HCC consists of a heterogeneous group of cancers with distinct etiologies and immune microenvironments. Almost all the components of innate and adaptive immune cells in HCC have altered, showing a decreasing trend in the number of tumor suppressor cells and an increasing trend in the pro-cancer cells, and there is also cross talk between various cell types. Various immunotherapies for HCC have also shown promising efficacy and application prospect. There are multilayered interwoven webs among various immune cell types in HCC, and emerging evidence demonstrates the promising prospect of immunotherapeutic approaches for HCC.

Tumor microenvironment-mediated immune evasion in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary liver malignancy and is the third leading cause of tumor-related mortality worldwide. In recent years, the emergency of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has revolutionized the management of HCC. Especially, the combination of atezolizumab (anti-PD1) and bevacizumab (anti-VEGF) has been approved by the FDA as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Despite great breakthrough in systemic therapy, HCC continues to portend a poor prognosis owing to drug resistance and frequent recurrence. The tumor microenvironment (TME) of HCC is a complex and structured mixture characterized by abnormal angiogenesis, chronic inflammation, and dysregulated extracellular matrix (ECM) remodeling, collectively contributing to the immunosuppressive milieu that in turn prompts HCC proliferation, invasion, and metastasis. The tumor microenvironment coexists and interacts with various immune cells to maintain the development of HCC. It is widely accepted that a dysfunctional tumor-immune ecosystem can lead to the failure of immune surveillance. The immunosuppressive TME is an external cause for immune evasion in HCC consisting of 1) immunosuppressive cells; 2) co-inhibitory signals; 3) soluble cytokines and signaling cascades; 4) metabolically hostile tumor microenvironment; 5) the gut microbiota that affects the immune microenvironment. Importantly, the effectiveness of immunotherapy largely depends on the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME). Also, the gut microbiota and metabolism profoundly affect the immune microenvironment. Understanding how TME affects HCC development and progression will contribute to better preventing HCC-specific immune evasion and overcoming resistance to already developed therapies. In this review, we mainly introduce immune evasion of HCC underlying the role of immune microenvironment, describe the dynamic interaction of immune microenvironment with dysfunctional metabolism and the gut microbiome, and propose therapeutic strategies to manipulate the TME in favor of more effective immunotherapy.

A phase II study of atezolizumab (ATEZO) and bevacizumab (BEV) in combination with Y90 TARE in patients (pts) with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Y90+/- BEAT.

TPS629 Background: The anti–PD-L1 antibody ATEZO prevents PD-L1 from interacting with PD-1 and B7.1, thus reinvigorating antitumor T cell activity. Anti-VEGF BEV can increase dendritic cell maturation, enhance T cell infiltration, and reduce myeloid-derived suppressor cells and regulatory T-cells in tumors. This combination has been FDA approved for first-line treatment of advanced HCC based on the IMbrave150 study. On the other hand, locoregional radiotherapy (e.g., Y90 TARE) enhances the diversity of the intratumoral T cell receptor repertoire. It is the standard of care for pts with intermediate-stage HCC (iHCC). Based on preclinical and clinical data, we hypothesize that the combination of Y90 TARE, BEV, and ATEZO induces synergistic tumor-killing. Methods: This is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase II study of Y90 TARE and BEV plus ATEZO compared with Y90 TARE alone in pts with unresectable IHCC (NCT04541173). The primary study objective is to assess and compare the progression-free survival (PFS) (per mRECIST 1.1) of pts in each arm. The main secondary objective is to determine the safety and tolerability (CTCAE v5) of TARE combined with ATEZO and BEV in pts with HCC. Exploratory objectives are to assess the role of the immunoscore and PD-L1 expression levels in the prediction of improved clinical outcome in pts receiving Y-90 TARE and BEV plus ATEZO; the composition of tumor-infiltrating immune cell subtypes in predicting response to a chosen therapy; how Y90 therapy affects the proportion of antigen-presenting cells in the tumor; and symptoms experienced by pts receiving TARE and BEV plus ATEZO treatment, using patient-reported outcomes. Eligible pts have either HCC that is not amenable to surgical resection, confirmed by pathology review, or at least BCLC stage B HCC outside of downstaging criteria. Other standard eligibility criteria apply. Pts must have a pretreatment liver biopsy taken and then be randomized 1:1 to TARE (Arm A) or TARE followed by ATEZO and BEV (Arm B). Pts will have TARE mapping during week (wk) 1 and TARE treatment during wk 2. In Arm B, pts will start BEV plus ATEZO 4 wks (±1 wk) after TARE treatment. Pts will have abdominal MRI or CT scans every 12 weeks, CT scans of the chest every 24 wks. Disease progression will be captured by both RECIST 1.1 and mRECIST. We plan to assess the safety of TARE with BEV and ATEZO in the first 10 pts randomized to Arm B for two cycles. If there are no Grade ≥ 3 unexpected toxicities possibly, probably or definitely related to combined TARE plus BEV plus ATEZO, the study will continue to accrue 128 pts in total. Pts will continue study treatment (Arm B) for a total of 24 months from initiation of TARE or until intolerable toxicity or disease progression occur, whichever is earlier. Clinical trial information: NCT04541173 .

Phase II trial of second-line regorafenib in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma after progression on first-line atezolizumab plus bevacizumab: REGONEXT trial.

TPS634 Background: Atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Ate/Bev) has demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the phase III trial, and is the new standard of care for first-line treatment of advanced HCC. However, the optimal sequence of therapy after failure of Ate/Bev is unknown. Regorafenib is an oral multikinase inhibitor that blocks the activity of protein kinases involved in angiogenesis, oncogenesis, metastasis, and tumour immunity. Although regorafenib showed survival benefit as subsequent treatment in patients with advanced HCC after progression on sorafenib, the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as subsequent therapy after Ate/Bev has not been investigated yet. Therefore, we designed a phase II trial investigating the efficacy and safety of regorafenib as second-line therapy in patients with advanced HCC who progressed on first-line Ate/Bev. Methods: This is a phase II, multicenter, single-arm study in patients with advanced HCC who had progression on first-line Ate/Bev. Additional key eligibility criteria include with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0–1, Child-Pugh score of 5 or 6, evaluable disease per RECIST v1.1, prior administration of at least 2 cycles of Ate/Bev, and adequate organ function. Key exclusion criteria include fibrolamellar carcinoma or mixed hepatocellular cholangiocarcinoma, prior regorafenib treatment, clinically significant bleeding within 28 days of enrollment and untreated or symptomatic CNS or leptomeningeal metastasis. Eligible patients will receive oral regorafenib 160 mg daily for 3 weeks of every 4-week cycle until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, or death. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints are overall survival, time to progression, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate and safety. ORR and PFS is assessed per RECIST v 1.1. This study is ongoing and 18 of planned 40 patients have been enrolled. This study is prospectively registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT5134532.

EGFR and Lyn inhibition augments regorafenib induced cell death in sorafenib resistant 3D tumor spheroid model

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common primary cancer of the liver and the third most lethal malignancy worldwide. Patients with unresectable HCC receive systemic therapies, traditionally sorafenib or lenvatinib as first line therapy. Despite its poor therapeutic response and high rates of resistance, in most countries, sorafenib still remains the globally used first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Thus, preclinical models demonstrating sorafenib resistance are crucial. 3D tumor spheroid models are becoming extremely important as screening platforms for drug therapies. In this paper, we utilized sorafenib resistant Huh7 cell line and LX2 hepatic stellate cell line to establish a sorafenib resistant 3D tumor spheroid model which can be used to test second-line treatment options. Our analysis demonstrated that sorafenib resistant 3D tumor spheroids are also more resistant to regorafenib and exhibit diverse features compared to parental tumor spheroids. Sorafenib resistant spheroids had higher CD24 and EpCAM positive cancer stem cell populations. In addition, several oncogenic kinases are upregulated in the sorafenib resistant spheroids. Importantly, combined inhibition of EGFR and Lyn kinase in sorafenib resistant tumor spheroids are effective in inducing cell death. Our model proved to be an affordable and useful model to mimic drug resistant tumor microenvironment in HCC and provided novel insights into candidates for new combinational therapies.