First-line Treatment For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Articles

Research Progress on Anti-angiogenesis Drugs in Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Primary liver cancer is the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide and ranked in third for cancer-related mortality rate. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) accounts for about 90% of all primary liver cancers. High vascularization of HCC implies the significance of angiogenesis in the development and pathogenesis of HCC. Several angiogenic pathways have been identified as being dysregulated in HCC, highlighting potential therapeutic targets for the treatment of HCC. In 2007, sorafenib was approved as the standard first-line treatment for advanced HCC, catapulting the therapeutic approach of HCC into the avenue of targeted therapy. In recent years, the approval of several novel targeted drugs and the progress in combination of immunotherapy and targeted therapies provide more alternatives for the treatment of HCC. The progress of anti-angiogenesis therapies in HCC over the past few decades is reviewed and the future prospect of anti-angiogenesis therapy for HCC is also discussed.

Autophagy modulation attenuates sorafenib resistance in HCC induced in rats

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has risen as the villain of cancer-related death globally, with a usual cruel forecasting. Sorafenib was officially approved by the FDA as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Despite the brilliant promise revealed in research, actual clinical results are limited due to the widespread appearance of drug resistance. The tumor microenvironment (TME) has been correlated to pharmacological resistance, implying that existing cellular level strategies may be insufficient to improve therapy success. The role of autophagy in cancer is a two-edged sword. On one hand, autophagy permits malignant cells to overcome stress, such as hypoxic TME and therapy-induced starvation. Autophagy, on the other hand, plays an important role in damage suppression, which can reduce carcinogenesis. As a result, controlling autophagy is certainly a viable technique in cancer therapy. The goal of this study was to investigate at the impact of autophagy manipulation with sorafenib therapy by analyzing autophagy induction and inhibition to sorafenib monotherapy in rats with HCC. Western blot, ELISA, immunohistochemistry, flow cytometry, and quantitative-PCR were used to investigate autophagy, apoptosis, and the cell cycle. Routine biochemical and pathological testing was performed. Ultracellular features and autophagic entities were observed using a transmission electron microscope (TEM). Both regimens demonstrated significant reductions in chemotherapeutic resistance and hepatoprotective effects. According to the findings, both autophagic inhibitors and inducers are attractive candidates for combating sorafenib-induced resistance in HCC.

Efficacy of hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy and its combination strategies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND With the rapid progress of systematic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), therapeutic strategies combining hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) with systematic therapy arised increasing concentrations. However, there have been no systematic review comparing HAIC and its combination strategies in the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. AIM To investigate the efficacy and safety of HAIC and its combination therapies for advanced HCC. METHODS A network meta-analysis was performed by including 9 randomized controlled trails and 35 cohort studies to carry out our study. The outcomes of interest comprised overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), tumor response and adverse events. Hazard ratios (HR) and odds ratios (OR) with a 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated and agents were ranked based on their ranking probability. RESULTS HAIC outperformed Sorafenib (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.42-0.72; HR = 0.51, 95%CI: 0.33-0.78; OR = 2.86, 95%CI: 1.37-5.98; OR = 5.45, 95%CI: 3.57-8.30; OR = 7.15, 95%CI: 4.06-12.58; OR = 2.89, 95%CI: 1.99-4.19; OR = 0.48, 95%CI: 0.25-0.92, respectively) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) (HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.33-0.75; HR = 0.62, 95%CI: 0.39-0.98; OR = 3.08, 95%CI: 1.36-6.98; OR = 2.07, 95%CI: 1.54-2.80; OR = 3.16, 95%CI: 1.71-5.85; OR = 2.67, 95%CI: 1.59-4.50; OR = 0.16, 95%CI: 0.05-0.54, respectively) in terms of efficacy and safety. HAIC + lenvatinib + ablation, HAIC + ablation, HAIC + anti- programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and HAIC + radiotherapy had the higher likelihood of providing better OS and PFS outcomes compared to HAIC alone. HAIC + TACE + S-1, HAIC + lenvatinib, HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE, and HAIC + sorafenib had the higher likelihood of providing better partial response and objective response rate outcomes compared to HAIC. HAIC + PD-1, HAIC + TACE + S-1 and HAIC + TACE had the higher likelihood of providing better complete response and disease control rate outcomes compared to HAIC alone. CONCLUSION HAIC proved more effective and safer than sorafenib and TACE. Furthermore, combined with other interventions, HAIC showed improved efficacy over HAIC monotherapy according to the treatment ranking analysis.

Use of integrated multi-omics analysis to determine antitumor efficacy of donafenib in combination with FADS2 inhibition in hepatocellular carcinoma.

e15083 Background: Pharmacotherapy remains a pivotal treatment strategy for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Donafenib, globally the first targeted therapy proven to offer superior survival benefits and safety over sorafenib in a large-scale phase III clinical trial with head-to-head comparison, has been adopted for first-line treatment of advanced HCC. Given the limited basic research on Donafenib both domestically and internationally, and its constrained clinical efficacy, this study aims to explore combination drug therapy for HCC in an attempt to achieve further breakthroughs and enhance the anticancer activity of Donafenib. Methods: A xenograft tumor model in nude mice was established to observe the in vivo antitumor effects of Donafenib. Transcriptomics and proteomics were employed to characterize the gene expression changes in HCC cell lines after Donafenib intervention and to screen for key molecules. A series of assays, including the Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK8), flow cytometry, scratch assays, Transwell assays, Western blotting, and in vivo tumorigenicity in nude mice, were conducted to determine the impact of the hub gene on the malignant behavior of HCC and to evaluate the combined antitumor effects of the molecular inhibition and Donafenib treatment in HCC. Results: Treatment with Donafenib significantly slowed tumor growth in a nude mouse xenograft model, resulting in a marked reduction in final tumor volumes compared to control subjects. Proteomic analyses post-Donafenib treatment identified FADS2 as the protein with the highest absolute log2 fold change among all differentially expressed proteins in HCC cells. This finding was corroborated by transcriptomic data, which indicated a concurrent downregulation of FADS2 at the mRNA level. Subsequent in vitro and in vivo assays validated the inhibitory effect of FADS2 blockade on the malignant biological behaviors of HCC cells. Importantly, the concomitant administration of Donafenib and the FADS2 inhibitor SC-26196 exhibited a synergistic antitumor action, significantly enhancing therapeutic efficacy in both HCC cell lines and xenografted tumors in nude mice. Conclusions: Combination therapy, a prevalent approach in clinical oncology, has the potential to augment treatment efficacy while simultaneously diminishing toxicity. This study employed an extensive multi-omics approach complemented by a range of both in vitro and in vivo experiments. It revealed that the synergistic use of Donafenib and SC-26196 markedly enhances Donafenib-induced the inhibition of cancer cell growth and metastasis, demonstrating a significant synergistic antitumor effect. These findings from our preclinical investigations may offer a promising new combinational drug regimen for the therapeutic management of HCC patients.

SCT-I10A combined with a bevacizumab biosimilar (SCT510) versus sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A randomized phase 3 trial.

4092 Background: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a significant health concern in China, and it has been a leading cause of cancer-related deaths. Immunotherapy combined with anti-vascular growth therapy is the first recommended therapy. In this study, we evaluated the safety and efficacy of SCT-I10A (an anti-programmed death 1 [PD-1] monoclonal antibody) combined with SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar) compared to sorafenib as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Methods: In this open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial (NCT04560894) conducted in China, patients with advanced HCC who had not received prior system therapy were enrolled and randomly assigned (2:1) to receive SCT-I10A (200 mg every three weeks [Q3W]) plus SCT510 (a bevacizumab biosimilar, 15 mg/kg Q3W) or sorafenib (400 mg orally twice daily) until no clinical benefit or unacceptable toxicity. Randomization was stratified by ECOG performance status (0 vs. 1), baseline alpha-fetoprotein level (<400ng/ml vs. ≥400ng/ml), macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis (yes vs. no). The co-primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the blinded independent central review (BICR) according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 in the full analysis set. Results: At the data cutoff for the interim analysis (November 2, 2023), a total of 346 patients were enrolled and received at least one dose (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group, n=230; sorafenib group, n=116), and the median follow-up was 19.7 months. The SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group exhibited a significantly longer median OS than that in the sorafenib group (22.1 vs. 14.2 months, hazard ratio [HR] 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.44, 0.81; p=0.0008). Median PFS was prolonged significantly in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group compared to the sorafenib group (7.1 vs. 2.9 months; HR 0.50; 95%CI: 0.38, 0.65; p<0.0001). The objective response rate (ORR) was higher in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group (32.8% [75/229]) than in the sorafenib group (4.3% [5/116]). Grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were observed in 42.6% (98/230) of patients in the SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group and 33.6% (39/116) of patients in the sorafenib group. The most common grade ≥3 TRAE was hypertension (SCT-I10A plus SCT510 group vs. sorafenib group: 7.8% [18/230] vs. 4.3% [5/116]). Three drug-related deaths (unknown cause, hemorrhage intracranial, or upper gastrointestinal hemorrhage in 1 patient each) occurred and were related to SCT510. Conclusions: The combination of SCT-I10A and SCT510 showed substantial clinical advantages and an acceptable safety profile in patients with advanced HCC, thereby supporting its suitability as a first-line treatment option for HCC. Clinical trial information: NCT04560894 .

Combining Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors with Loco-Regional Treatments in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Ready for Prime Time?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a disease with a poor prognosis, often diagnosed at an advanced stage. Therapeutic options have developed considerably in recent years, particularly with trans-arterial treatments. Systemic treatments have also evolved significantly, with the rise of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The combination of loco-regional treatments and ICI is opening up new prospects and is the subject of numerous clinical trials. Recently, two global phase 3 trials investigating ICI-based adjuvant combinations have demonstrated improvements in recurrence-free survival or progression-free survival in patients treated with resection, ablation, or trans-arterial chemoembolization. However, mature data and overall survival results are still awaited but will be difficult to interpret. We are at the start of a new era of combinations of loco-regional treatments and immunotherapy. The identification of the best therapeutic strategies and predictive biomarkers is a crucial issue for future standards in clinical practice.

Immune checkpoint inhibitors and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors with or without transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (CHANCE2201): a target trial emulation study

The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unconfirmed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included advanced HCC patients receiving either TACE with ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (TACE-ICI-VEGF) or only ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (ICI-VEGF) from January 2018 to December 2022. The study design followed the target trial emulation framework with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) to minimize biases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05332821. Among 1244 patients included in the analysis, 802 (64.5%) patients received TACE-ICI-VEGF treatment, and 442 (35.5%) patients received ICI-VEGF treatment. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months and 20.6 months, respectively. Post-application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. TACE-ICI-VEGF group exhibited a significantly improved median OS (22.6 months [95% CI: 21.2-23.9] vs 15.9 months [14.9-17.8]; P<0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.75]). Median PFS was also longer in TACE-ICI-VEGF group (9.9 months [9.1-10.6] vs 7.4 months [6.7-8.5]; P<0.0001; aHR 0.74 [0.65-0.85]) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. A higher ORR was observed in TACE-ICI-VEGF group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (41.2% vs 22.9%, P<0.0001; 47.3% vs 29.7%, P<0.0001). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 178 patients (22.2%) in TACE-ICI-VEGF group and 80 patients (18.1%) in ICI-VEGF group. This multicenter study supports the use of TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile. National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Nanjing Life Health Science and Technology Project.

Toripalimab Plus Bevacizumab as First-line Treatment for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Prospective, Multicenter, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial.

This phase II, multicenter, prospective, single-arm study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of toripalimab plus bevacizumab for treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Treatment-naïve patients with advanced HCC received toripalimab 240 mg plus bevacizumab 15 mg/kg every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints included safety and tolerability and objective response rate (ORR) assessed by the investigator per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. Fifty-four patients were enrolled between April 17, 2020, and December 11, 2020. As assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1, the ORR was 31.5% [95% confidence interval (CI), 19.5-45.6] and the lower bound of the 95% CI was above the prespecified boundary of 10%. The independent review committee (IRC) assessed ORR according to the modified RECIST (mRECIST), which was 46.3% (95% CI, 32.6-60.4). The median progression-free survival was 8.5 (95% CI, 5.5-11.0) and 9.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 to not evaluable) as assessed by the investigator according to RECIST v1.1 and IRC according to mRECIST criteria, respectively. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached, and the 12- and 24-month OS rates were 77.3% and 63.5%, respectively. Grade 3 or higher treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 27 patients (50.0%). The most common TEAEs were proteinuria (59.3%), hypertension (38.9%), increased aspartate aminotransferase (33.3%), increased amylase (29.6%), decreased platelet count (27.8%), and increased bilirubin levels (27.8%). Toripalimab plus bevacizumab showed a favorable efficacy and safety profile, supporting further studies on this combination regimen as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC.

The long-term efficacy and safety of apatinib are inferior to sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Apatinib, a novel tyrosine kinase inhibitor independently developed by China, has been widely used in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in recent years. For more than a decade, sorafenib has been the classic first-line treatment option for patients with advanced HCC. However, the results of clinical studies comparing the efficacy and safety of these 2 drugs are still controversial. Therefore, the aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of apatinib versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Up to August 14, 2023, the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, and Wanfang were searched, and clinical studies of experimental group (apatinib or apatinib plus transarterial chemoembolization [TACE]) versus control group (sorafenib or sorafenib plus TACE) in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC were included. Two researchers evaluated the quality of the included studies and extracted the data. Revman 5.4 software was used for meta-analysis. A total of 12 studies involving 1150 patients were included. Five studies are apatinib alone versus sorafenib alone, and the other 7 studies are apatinib plus TACE versus sorafenib plus TACE. The results of the meta-analysis showed that compared with sorafenib alone, apatinib could improve (OR = 3.06, 95%CI: 1.76-5.31), had no advantage in improving DCR (OR = 1.52, 95%CI: 0.86-2.68) and prolonging PFS (HR = 1.35, 95%CI: 0.94-1.96), and was significantly worse in prolonging OS (HR = 1.43, 95%CI: 1.08-1.88). Similarly, apatinib plus TACE was inferior to sorafenib plus TACE in prolonging OS (HR = 1.15, 95%CI: 1.03-1.28), although it improved ORR (OR = 1.49, 95%CI: 1.03-2.16). In terms of adverse drug events, the overall incidence of adverse events, and the incidence of drug reduction and discontinuation in the experimental group were significantly higher than those in the control group (P < .05). The incidence of hypertension, proteinuria, and oral mucositis in the experimental group was significantly higher than that in the control group (P < .05). In the setting of first-line treatment of advanced HCC, apatinib has improved short-term efficacy (ORR) compared with sorafenib, but the safety and long-term efficacy of apatinib are inferior to sorafenib.

Lenvatinib combined with sintilimab plus transarterial chemoembolization as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Recently, combination therapy has shown a better trend towards improved tumour response and survival outcomes than monotherapy in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, research on triple therapy [lenvatinib + sintilimab + transarterial chemoembolization (TACE)] as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC is limited. To evaluate the safety and efficacy of triple therapy as a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. HCC patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C treated with triple therapy were enrolled. All patients were treated with lenvatinib every day and sintilimab once every 3 wk. Moreover, TACE was performed every 4-6 wk if necessary. The primary outcome of the study was overall survival (OS). The secondary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), and incidence of adverse events. Forty HCC patients who underwent triple therapy were retrospectively analysed from January 2019 to January 2022. With a median follow-up of 8.5 months, the 3-, 6-, and 12-mo OS rates were 100%, 88.5%, and 22.5%, respectively. The ORR and DCR were 45% and 90%, respectively. The median progressive free survival and median OS were not reached. Common complications were observed in 76% of the patients (grade 3, 15%; grade 4, 2.5%). Combination therapy comprising lenvatinib, sintilimab and TACE achieved promising outcomes in advanced HCC patients and had manageable effects.

Prognostic biomarkers associated with immune checkpoint inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma.

The treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), particularly advanced HCC, has been a serious challenge. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are landmark drugs in the field of cancer therapy in recent years, which have changed the landscape of cancer treatment. In the field of HCC treatment, this class of drugs has shown good therapeutic prospects. For example, atezolizumab in combination with bevacizumab has been approved as first-line treatment for advanced HCC due to significant efficacy. However, sensitivity to ICI therapy varies widely among HCC patients. Therefore, there is an urgent need to search for determinants of resistance/sensitivity to ICIs and to screen biomarkers that can predict the efficacy of ICIs. This manuscript reviews the research progress of prognostic biomarkers associated with ICIs in HCC in order to provide a scientific basis for the development of clinically individualised precision medication regimens.

HDAC Inhibition Sensitize Hepatocellular Carcinoma to Lenvatinib via Suppressing AKT Activation.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a deadly malignancy with limited treatment options. As a first-line treatment for advanced HCC, Lenvatinib has been applicated in clinic since 2018. Resistance to Lenvatinib, however, has severely restricted the clinical benefits of this drug. Therefore, it is urgent to explore the potential resistance mechanisms of Lenvatinib and identify appropriate methods to reduce resistance for the treatment of HCC. We identified SAHA, a HDAC inhibitor, to have effective anti-tumor activity against Lenvatinib-resistant HCC organoids by screening a customized drug library. Mechanism analysis revealed that SAHA upregulates PTEN expression and suppresses AKT signaling, which contributes to reversing Lenvatinib resistance in liver cancer cells. Furthermore, combinational application of Lenvatinib and HDAC inhibitor or AKT inhibitor synergistically inhibits HCC cell proliferation and induces cell apoptosis. Finally, we confirmed the synergistic effects of Lenvatinib and SAHA, or AZD5363 in primary liver cancer patient derived organoids. Collectively, these findings may enable the development of Lenvatinib combination therapies for HCC.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of transarterial chemoembolization combined with lenvatinib as the first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Purpose: Results from the LAUNCH trial suggest transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in combination with lenvatinib is significantly more effective than lenvatinib as a first-line treatment option for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, the cost of TACE is substantial. This study compares the cost-effectiveness of TACE in combination with lenvatinib (TACE-LEN) with that of lenvatinib alone as the first-line treatment for advanced HCC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. Methods: Markov models of different health states were constructed to simulate first-line treatment, disease progression, and survival in patients with advanced HCC. Clinical efficacy was obtained from the LAUNCH trial. The cost of drugs was sourced from national tender prices, and the treatment cost of weight-decreased was obtained from the Fujian Provincial Bureau of Prices. Other costs and utility values were based on the published literature. Total costs, life years (LYs), quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) comprised the model output. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to validate model robustness and subgroup analyses were also conducted. Results: Analysis of the model showed that compared to lenvatinib, TACE-LEN improved effectiveness by 1.60 QALYs at a total cost increase of $48,874.69, with an ICER value of $30,482.13/QALY. A one-way sensitivity analysis found that the progression-free survival utility value per year had the greatest impact on the model. A probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that TACE-LEN had a 97.9% probability of being cost-effective as the first-line treatment option for advanced HCC compared to lenvatinib when the willingness-to-pay (WTP) value was $38,201/QALY (three times the Chinese GDP per capita in 2022). Subgroup analysis showed that all subgroups of patients preferred TACE-LEN. However, when the WTP threshold was below $30,300/QALY, TACE-LEN is no longer cost-effective. Conclusion: Our study found TACE-LEN to be a cost-effective treatment option for patients with advanced HCC compared to lenvatinib from a Chinese healthcare system perspective, but not so in low-income provinces in China.

Cost-effectiveness of nivolumab versus sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma.

Nivolumab improves overall survival (OS) and is associated with less adverse events (AE) compared with sorafenib in the first-line treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). But which approach is the most cost-effective remains uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of nivolumab vs sorafenib as first-line therapy for patients with advanced HCC from the perspective of Chinese healthcare system. A partitioned survival mode was constructed to evaluate the health and economic outcomes of nivolumab vs sorafenib as first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The clinical data and outcomes were obtained from CheckMate 459 trial. Medical costs and utilities were collected from published sources. Quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) were calculated. One-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were used to examine model uncertainty. Additional subgroup and scenario analyses were performed. Treatment with nivolumab yielded an additional 0.27 QALYs with an incremental cost of $65,579.19 compared with sorafenib, leading to an ICER of $236,765.93/QALY in China. One-way sensitivity analysis found the model outputs to be most affected for hazard ratio (HR) of OS and the cost of nivolumab. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis showed that the probability of nivolumab being cost-effective was 0% at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $38,201.19/QALY. The scenario analyses indicated altering the time horizon of the model did not reverse the economic results. Nivolumab as first-line treatment could gain more health benefits for advanced HCC compared with sorafenib, but was estimated not to be cost-effective at the commonly adopted WTP threshold of China.

Immune-Based Combination Therapies for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fourth most frequent cause of cancer-related death worldwide. HCC frequently presents as advanced disease at diagnosis, and disease relapse following radical surgery is frequent. In recent years, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of advanced HCC, particularly with the introduction of atezolizumab/bevacizumab as the new standard of care for first-line treatment. Recently, dual immune checkpoint blockade with durvalumab plus tremelimumab has also emerged as an effective first-line treatment for advanced HCC and most of the research is currently focused on developing combination treatments based mainly on ICIs. In this review, we will discuss the rationale and ongoing clinical trials of immune-based combination therapies for the treatment of advanced HCC, also focusing on new immunotherapy strategies such as chimeric antigen receptor T cells (CAR-T) and anti-cancer vaccines.

Identification of immune-related target and prognostic biomarkers in PBMC of hepatocellular carcinoma

Background Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths worldwide, and is characterized by insidious onset, rapid progression, and poor prognosis. Immunotherapy is a first-line treatment for advanced HCC. The identification of immune-related prognostic markers may be an effective strategy to predict and improve clinical response rate of immunotherapy.Methods The DESeq2, edgeR, and limma R packages were used to compare the transcriptomes of HCC with different prognoses. Cancer-related databases such as UALCAN, TNMplot, GEPIA, muttarget and Human Protein Atlas (HPA), and the Kaplan–Meier Plotter platform were used to analyze the relationship between CLDN18 and the clinical characteristics, as well as prognosis of HCC. The co-expressed genes of CLDN18 were obtained from LinkedOmics platform, and GO functional enrichment and KEGG pathway analysis were performed. The CIBERSORT, TIMER, Timer 2.0 and TISIDB algorithms were used to analyze immune infiltration.Results CLDN18 was differentially expressed in HCC patients with different prognoses, and its expression level in PBMC was positively correlated with the stage of BCLC. In addition, CLDN18 was significantly overexpressed in HCC tumor tissues compared to adjacent non-tumor tissues, which was consistent with PBMC sequencing results and immunohistochemical data from human protein profiles. CLDN18 was also positively correlated with HCC staging and grading, and high expression levels of CLDN18 predicted shorter overall survival. Functional annotation of CLDN18 in HCC revealed enrichment of the cellular senescence and protein activation cascade, along with biological processes such as cell cycle, inflammatory response, and cellular ketone metabolism. In addition, CLDN18 was also associated with tumor infiltrating immune cells, suppressive immune cell markers, T lymphocyte depletion and activation of HCC, and low expression of CLDN18 was associated with higher CD8 + T cell infiltration and better survival rates.ConclusionsCLDN18 is a potential prognostic marker and immunotherapeutic target for HCC.

Transarterial chemoembolization for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma without macrovascular invasion or extrahepatic metastasis: analysis of factors prognostic of clinical outcomes.

To evaluate the safety and efficacy of TACE and factors predicting survival in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) without macrovascular invasion (MVI) or extrahepatic spread (EHS). This single-center retrospective study included 236 treatment-naïve patients who underwent TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC without MVI or EHS between January 2007 and December 2021. Following TACE, the median overall survival (OS) was 24 months. Multivariate Cox regression analyses revealed that tumor number ≥4 (risk point: 3), maximal tumor size >10cm (risk point: 2), Child-Pugh class B (risk point: 2), alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) concentration ≥400 ng/mL (risk point: 2), and presence of HCC rupture (risk point: 2) were risk factors significantly associated with OS. The expected median OS among patients with <2, 2-4, and 5-9 risk points were 72, 29, and 12 months respectively. The major complication rates were significantly lower in patients with maximal tumor size ≤10 cm than in those with maximal tumor size >10cm (4% [5/138] vs 21% [21/98], p = 0.001). TACE may be safe and effective in selected patients with advanced HCC without MVI or EHS, with a median OS of 24 months. Patients with limited tumor burden, compensated liver function, absence of HCC rupture, and favorable biologic markers may benefit the most from TACE. TACE is not recommended for patients with huge HCCs (>10cm) because of its high rate of major complications (21%).

A prospective, single-arm, phase II clinical study of tislelizumab in combination with lenvatinib for perioperative treatment of resectable primary hepatocellular carcinoma with high risk of recurrence.

e16218 Background: Surgery is the main radical treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), but the high postoperative recurrence rate makes the survival benefit of patients limited. Neoadjuvant therapy mainly reduces postoperative recurrence by controlling micrometastasis and reducing preoperative tumor load and other high recurrence risk factors, but there are limited data on its application in liver cancer. Tislelizumab, a PD-1 monoclonal antibody, has shown promising efficacy with acceptable safety profile in combination with lenvatinib in the first-line treatment of advanced HCC. This study aims to explore the safety and feasibility of tislelizumab combined with lenvatinib in the neoadjuvant therapy and adjuvant therapy of resectable HCC. Methods: This prospective, single-center, single-arm phase II study (NCT04834986) enrolled patients with histologically confirmed resectable HCC who were at high risk of recurrence, as assessed by the investigators before surgery. Patients did not have any medical treatment in the past, with ECOG of 0-1, and had adequate organ and bone marrow function. Eligible patients received 4 cycles with tislelizumab (200mg, d1, Q3W) combined with Lenvatinib (8mg/kg, PO, qd) and surgery was performed within 4 weeks after treatment. At 4-8 weeks after surgery, adjuvant therapy was started with tislelizumab (200mg, d1, Q3W) and lenvatinib (8mg/kg, PO, qd) for at least half a year or until disease progression or intolerance of adverse reactions. Primary endpoints were safety and feasibility; secondary endpoints were ORR, 1 and 2-years DFS%, pCR, and DFS. Results: From Sep 7,2021 to Nov 9,2022, 24 patients (median age, 57.5 years) were enrolled, with most patients were males (95.8%) and 22 patients (91.7%) had HBV infection. All patients had Child-Pugh grade A and ECOG PS 0. The median treatment period was 4 cycles. In 24 patients, 17 patients (70.8%) underwent R0 resection, 3 patients (3/17, 17.6%) achieved complete pathological response (PCR), and 6 patients (6/17, 35.3%) achieved major pathological response rate (MPR, necrosis &gt; 70%). 3 patients (12.5%) had significant tumor shrinkage and refused surgery. 1 patient (4.2%) is waiting surgery. 3 patients (12.5%) developed disease progression. According to RECIST1.1, ORR was 54.2% (13/24, CR 1, PR 12), DCR was 87.5%. According to mRECIST, ORR was 75.0% (18/24, CR 6, PR 12), DCR was 87.5%. No grade 3 or above adverse events were observed during neoadjuvant treatment period. The most common adverse events of any grade were rash (14/24,58.3%), hypertension (5/24,20.8%) and diarrhea (4/24,16.7%). Conclusions: Tislelizumab in combination with lenvatinib was well tolerated and showed promising efficacy as a neoadjuvant therapy for resectable HCC with high risk of recurrence. Clinical trial information: NCT04834986 .

Real-world data: Clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab in Veteran Health Administration.

2651 Background: Advanced Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is an aggressive tumor, and most patients have a poor prognosis. Recent clinical trials have demonstrated improved survival with molecularly targeted treatment and immunotherapy. Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab (A+B ) is the recommended first-line treatment for advanced HCC based on the phase 3 IMbrave 150 trial. However, in a real-life setting, many patients do not meet the inclusion criteria of this landmark trial. This study proposes a retrospective review of outcomes of advanced HCC patients receiving A + B in Veterans Health Administration (VHA). Methods: Patients with advanced HCC receiving 1st line systemic therapy with A+ B at the VHA between Dec 1, 2019, to Mar 1, 2022, were selected from the electronic medical records (EMR) using ICD-9 and ICD-10 codes. Abstractors reviewed EMR and followed from their index date of A+ B initiation until death or their last VHA visit, with the study period ending on Jan 31, 2023. The Chi-Squared test was used to compare rates, and the Mann-Whitney test was used to compare medians. Results: A total of 332 patients met the study criteria. The median age was 67 yrs., 99% were males, 63% non-Hispanic White, 26% were Black, 66 % had ECOG ≥ 1, 84% had CPS class A, 16% had CPS class B and C, 62% had grade 2 ALBI score, 56% had viral hepatitis-caused HCC, 80 % had cirrhosis, and 67% had prior local therapies. The outcomes are shown. Conclusions: In our real world, despite having similar PFS as the phase 3 IMbrave 150 trial, our OS at 12 months was lower (52% vs. 67%), given that we had more elderly patients with moderate liver dysfunction and 40% were non-white. This study provides actual outcomes in clinical practice where patients do not match the study population of the pivotal trial. [Table: see text]

Abstract 1281: Oncoprotein YB-1 modulation of Lyn-MAPK-NF-kB pathway, a potential therapeutic strategy combined with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC

Abstract The Y-Box Binding protein 1 (YB-1) is a 324 amino acid-long member of the Cold Shock Domain (CSD) protein superfamily. YB-1 interacts with micro RNAs and non-coding RNAs in the cytoplasm, acting as a regulator of mRNA translation. YB-1 translocation into the nucleus is circadian clock-dependent and leads to the upregulation of cyclin gene expression, among others. Another mechanism of nuclear translocation of YB-1 is mediated by phosphorylation of the Ser 102 residue in the CSD. The YB-1 oncoprotein acts as a transcription factor when bound to DNA, modulating the transcription of genes that regulate biological processes such as Multidrug Resistance Mutation 1 (MDR1). YB-1 is linked to poor prognosis in breast, prostate, and liver cancer. Despite advances in biomedicine, the incidence and mortality of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) remain high. Sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase Inhibitor (TKI), is the first-line treatment for advanced HCC. Sorafenib also inhibits downstream activation of NF-kB by inhibition of Lyn phosphorylation (Y397). However, it was observed in many patients that its sorafenib’s effectiveness is hampered by drug resistance, but the mechanism is still unclear. We have found that SK-HEP-1 HCC cells transfected with a YB-X-1 overexpression plasmid subsequently developed into a stable YB-1 overexpression cell line (SK-HEP-1+YB-1) displayed increased invasion, migration, proliferation, and colony formation property as compared to the vector control (SKHEP1+Vec). The SK-HEP-1+YB-1 cell line also showed increased IC50 for sorafenib and elevated phosphorylation of Lyn (Y397) and further activated NF-kB (S165/S176) phosphorylation. This indicates YB-1 may cause increased Sorafenib resistance in HCC by activating tyrosine kinases (TK), such as lyn, and simultaneous activation of NF-kB. The combination of YB-1 inhibition and sorafenib might provide a novel therapeutic strategy and improve the survival of patients with advanced-stage HCC. Citation Format: Ana G. Ayala Pazzi, Omar Karkoutly, Kristopher Ezell, Samantha Lopez, Kyle D. Doxtater, Elias George, Vijian Dhevan, Manish K. Tripathi. Oncoprotein YB-1 modulation of Lyn-MAPK-NF-kB pathway, a potential therapeutic strategy combined with sorafenib for advanced stage HCC [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2023; Part 1 (Regular and Invited Abstracts); 2023 Apr 14-19; Orlando, FL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(7_Suppl):Abstract nr 1281.