First-line Combination Therapy Research Articles

Abstract B066: An AI approach to unraveling treatment response in pancreatic cancer: Insights from the COMPASS trial leveraging large language models (LLMs)

Abstract Pancreatic cancer, often termed the “silent killer” due to its vague symptoms and late diagnosis, continues to challenge oncologists with its significant treatment challenges and poor prognosis. Standard-of-care regimens, such as FOLFIRINOX (FFX) and Gemcitabine + nab-paclitaxel (GnP), show varied efficacy among patients. Understanding the factors that contribute to these varied responses is crucial for advancing personalized treatment strategies. This study uses NetraAI, a novel machine learning (ML) approach to analyze whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNASeq) data from pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) subjects (n=208) prior to FFX or GnP first-line combination therapy from the COMPASS trial, aiming to identify key variables that distinguish between responses to these two therapeutic regimens. NetraAI identifies explainable subpopulations within clinical trial data defined by a set of driving variables (i.e., hypotheses) related to drug response. This approach focuses on explaining only subjects that collectively represent a real effect and does not forcibly explain everyone, to avoid overfitting. Our analysis identified several key factors significantly correlating with treatment response. Downregulated LRRC8E and upregulated PTPRH showed favourable response to GnP, while upregulated UTG1A13p was associated with FFX response. Across all patients (stable disease, partial response, complete response) CLEC19A and LRRC29 expression were associated with better response to both FFX and GnP, suggesting that they may play a role in the chemotherapy response mechanisms. The NetraGPT module, leverages large language models (LLMs) and NetraAI insights to further query trial results. Querying NetraGPT, we identified a link between LRRC29 and HOOK1, associated with SHP, which has been linked to GnP response in non-small cell lung cancer. These findings suggest that chemotherapy response may be cancer-agnostic, depending on the chemotherapeutic agent, with LRRC29 expression discriminating selecting GnP versus FFX treatment. Our findings highlight the potential of AI in elucidating complex relationships within clinical trial data, offering valuable insights into the determinants of treatment response in pancreatic cancer to achieve more personalized cancer care. The identified biomarkers provide a promising foundation for developing personalized treatment strategies, enhancing the precision of therapeutic decisions. Integrating explainable ML methods for small and medium sized clinical data with LLMs provides an exciting step forward. Retrieval Augmentation allows researchers to create LLMs that are designed to answer questions about heterogeneous patient populations through the vantage of the various insights that have been discovered via specialized ML methods such as NetraAI and its NetraGPT module. We will provide a demo of how an interactive LLM was used to derive new insights into PDAC that may pave the way to precision treatment and explain how researchers can begin to create their own versions of these tools. Citation Format: Joseph Geraci, Bessi Qorri, Mike Tsay, Christian Cumbaa, Paul Leonchyk, Larry Alphs, Luca Pani. An AI approach to unraveling treatment response in pancreatic cancer: Insights from the COMPASS trial leveraging large language models (LLMs) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Advances in Pancreatic Cancer Research; 2024 Sep 15-18; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(17 Suppl_2):Abstract nr B066.

Clinical outcomes of first-line combination therapy with immune checkpoint inhibitor for metastatic non-clear cell renal cell carcinoma: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Japan.

In metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), recent studies have shown promising efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy. However, there are insufficient evidences about clinical efficacy and safety of ICI combination therapy in metastatic non-ccRCC (nccRCC). We retrospectively investigated 44 patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab (ICI + ICI group) or anti-PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) (ICI + TKI group), and assessed clinical efficacy in both groups. Of all patients, overall response rate and disease control rate for ICI combination treatments were 36.3% and 75%, respectively. The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) was 8.8 and 23.9months, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of liver metastasis significantly affected worse PFS and OS (p = 0.035 and p = 0.049). Importantly, PFS and OS seemed similar in ICI + ICI group and ICI + TKI group (p = 0.778 and p = 0.559). Although the discontinuation rate of the combination therapy due to adverse effects in patients aged ≥ 75years was significantly higher compared to that in patients aged < 75years (45% versus 12%, p = 0.017), there were no significant differences in PFS and OS between two groups (p = 0.290 and p = 0.257, respectively). This study confirms clinical benefit of ICI combination therapy for metastatic nccRCC patients in real-world settings. Furthermore, the effectiveness of combination therapy was comparable between patients aged < 75 and those ≥75years with respect to clinical prognosis.

Real-world efficacy and safety of durvalumab-tremelimumab as second-line systemic therapy after atezolizumab-bevacizumab in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma.

The efficacy and safety of immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) for the treatment of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma are known. We explored ICI rechallenges with direct switching from 1 ICI regimen to another. This retrospective study included 16 patients who received atezolizumab-bevacizumab (Atezo+Bev) and durvalumab-tremelimumab (Dur+Tre) as the first-line and second-line combination therapy, respectively, at Hiroshima University Hospital. The radiological response and adverse event were evaluated in all patients. Of the 16 patients, 12 were male, and the median age at Atezo+Bev induction was 71 years. The reasons for medication changes were disease progression in 11 patients and adverse events in 5 patients. With Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre initiation, the Barcelona-Clinic Liver-Cancer stage (A/B/C) progressed in 9/6/3 and 3/4/9 patients and the Child-Pugh classification (A/B/C) progressed in 12/4/0 and 9/6/3 patients, respectively. The disease control rate and overall response rate of Atezo+Bev were 87.5% and 58.3%, respectively, and of Dur+Tre were 62.5% and 0%, respectively. The most common immune-related adverse event in both the Atezo+Bev and Dur+Tre groups was colitis; 3 of the 5 patients with colitis on Atezo+Bev treatment had colitis with Dur+Tre, and 2 had exacerbations. Regarding liver function, ALBI score significantly decreased during Atezo+Bev, but not Dur+Tre, treatment. In patients with colitis following Atezo+Bev, subsequent Dur+Tre treatment may induce colitis recurrence or exacerbation. For immune-related adverse events other than colitis, Dur+Tre could provide relatively safe disease control while maintaining liver function.

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib for first-line treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma: extended 8-year follow-up results of efficacy and safety from the phase III CheckMate 214 trial

Nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI) has demonstrated superior overall survival (OS) and durable response benefits versus sunitinib (SUN) with long-term follow-up in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC). We report updated analyses with 8 years of median follow-up from CheckMate214. Patients with aRCC (N= 1096) were randomized to NIVO 3 mg/kg plus IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W× four doses, followed by NIVO (3 mg/kg or 240 mg Q2W or 480 mg Q4W); or SUN (50 mg) once daily for 4 weeks on, 2 weeks off. The endpoints included OS, independent radiology review committee (IRRC)-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), and IRRC-assessed objective response rate (ORR) in intermediate/poor-risk (I/P; primary), intent-to-treat (ITT; secondary), and favorable-risk (FAV; exploratory) patients. With 8 years (99.1 months) of median follow-up, the hazard ratio [HR; 95% confidence interval (CI)] for OS with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 0.72 (0.62-0.83) in ITT patients, 0.69 (0.59-0.81) in I/P patients, and 0.82 (0.60-1.13) in FAV patients. PFS probabilities at 90 months were 22.8% versus 10.8% (ITT), 25.4% versus 8.5% (I/P), and 12.7% versus 17.0% (FAV), respectively. ORR with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 39.5% versus 33.0% (ITT), 42.4% versus 27.5% (I/P), and 29.6% versus 51.6% (FAV). Rates of complete response were higher with NIVO+IPI versus SUN in all International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups (ITT, 12.0% versus 3.5%; I/P, 11.8% versus 2.6%; FAV, 12.8% versus 6.5%). The median duration of response (95% CI) with NIVO+IPI versus SUN was 76.2 versus 25.1 months [59.1 months-not estimable (NE) versus 19.8-33.2 months] in ITT patients, 82.8 versus 19.8 months (54.1 months-NE versus 16.4-26.4 months) in I/P patients, and 61.5 versus 33.2 months (27.8 months-NE versus 24.8-51.4 months) in FAV patients. The incidence of treatment-related adverse events was consistent with previous reports. Exploratory post hoc analyses are reported for FAV patients, those receiving subsequent therapy based on their response status, clinical subpopulations, and adverse events over time. Superior survival, durable response benefits, and a manageable safety profile were maintained with NIVO+IPI versus SUN at 8 years, the longest phase III follow-up for a first-line checkpoint inhibitor combination therapy in aRCC.

Prognostic Impact of the Administration of Antibiotics and Proton Pump Inhibitors in Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The prognostic impact of the administration of antibiotics and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for advanced cancer has recently been documented. However, how these drugs affect the outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unclear. We retrospectively evaluated the data of 128 patients with RCC who received first-line ICI combination therapy. The patients were grouped according to their history of antibiotics and PPIs use one month before the initiation of ICI combination therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and objective response rate (ORR) after ICI combination therapy were compared between patients treated with and without antibiotics or PPIs. Of the 128 patients, 30 (23%) and 44 (34%) received antibiotics and PPIs, respectively. Patients treated with antibiotics exhibited shorter PFS and OS compared to those who did not receive antibiotics (median PFS: 4.9 vs. 16.1 months, p<0.0001; OS: 20.8 vs. 49.0 months, p=0.0034). Multivariate analyses showed that antibiotic administration was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (hazard ratio: 2.54: p=0.0002) and OS (hazard ratio: 2.56: p=0.0067) after adjusting for other covariates. In contrast, there were no significant differences in either PFS or OS between patients who received PPIs and those who did not. (PFS: p=0.828; OS: p=0.105). Antibiotics administration before ICI combination therapy was negatively associated with outcomes of first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. Therefore, careful monitoring is required for potentially high-risk patients undergoing ICI combination therapy.

Efficacy and safety of mosunetuzumab-based regimens as first-line therapy in non-Hodgkin lymphomas: A systematic review of clinical trials.

e19013 Background: Bispecific antibodies (BsAbs) are emerging as a promising new immunotherapy modality in patients with lymphoma. Mosunetuzumab is a CD20xCD3 T-cell engaging bispecific monoclonal antibody that redirects T cells to eliminate malignant B cells, was first to receive approval for relapsed or refractory follicular lymphoma. Here, we report the safety and efficacy of Mosunetuzumab as a first line therapy in combination or monotherapy regimen in non-hodgkin lymphoma. Methods: A literature search was performed on PubMed with keywords for “Mosunetuzumab” AND “lymphoma”. The search was performed from the inception of data till 1/1/2024. A total of 237 articles were screened and three non-randomized clinical trials (nRCTs, N=124) were included. PRISMA guidelines were followed while conducting this systematic review. Results: In 3 clinical trials, 54 patients were treated with mosunetuzumab monotherapy, 40 with mosunetuzumab + cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (CHOP), and 30 with subcutaneous mosunetuzumab. 94 patients had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), and 30 patients had follicular lymphoma. ORR, CR, and PR were reported in 56%, 43%, and 13% patients, respectively, treated with mosunetuzumab monotherapy in DLBCL. ORR, CR, and PR were reported in 87.5%, 85%, and 2.5% patients, respectively, treated with mosunetuzumab + CHOP in DLBCL. ORR, CR, and PR were reported in 96%, 83%, and 12.5% patients, respectively, treated with subcutaneous mosunetuzumab in follicular lymphoma. Neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, infections, and fatigue were common adverse effects given in the table. Conclusions: Mosunetuzumab with CHOP showed higher efficacy results and was well tolerated by most of the patients and can be an option to achieve high response rates in DLBCL. Subcutaneous mosunetuzumab was active in follicular lymphoma with manageable toxicity in follicular lymphoma. However, long-term results are needed to determine the durability of responses and long-term safety and survival rates with these regimens. [Table: see text]

Update results of anlotinib combined with TQB2450 (PD-L1 blockade) as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, multicenter, open-label phase II clinical trial.

e16035 Background: Recent studies have demonstrated encouraging efficacy in patients with ESCC when combining PD-1 blockades with chemotherapy in the first-line setting. However, the safety profile of conventional chemotherapy remains unsatisfactory, suggesting the chemotherapy-free regimen a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, has shown therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for ESCC patients in China. TQB2450 is a novel PD-L1 blockade developed by Chia Tai Tianqing Pharmaceutical Group Co., Ltd. (Nanjing, China). This study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of anlotinib plus TQB2450 as first-line therapy for patients with advanced ESCC. Preliminary results were presented at the 2023 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 377), the 2023 ASCO (Abs 4041) and the 2023 ESMO (1531P), the consecutively updated results were presented in this report. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC, whose age was between 18 and 75 years, with ECOG PS of 0 or 1 score and life expectancy of &gt; 3 months were inclusion criteria. Eligible patients were administered with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) plus TQB2450 (1200mg, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 and iRECIST using CT scans every 2 cycles for the first 6 cycles, and every 3 cycles thereafter. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 46. The primary endpoint was ORR, secondary endpoints included safety, PFS, DCR, DoR and OS. Results: From Mar 2022 to Sep 2022, a total of 46 patients were enrolled. At the data cut-off date (Dec, 2023), there were 1 CR (2.2%), 31 PR (67.4%), 10 SD (21.7%), 1 PD (2.2%) and 3 NE (6.5%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 69.6% (95%CI: 54.2%~82.3%), DCR was 91.3% (95%CI: 79.2%~97.6%). At the data cut-off date, 16 patients discontinued treatment due to PD, the preliminary prognostic result exhibited that the median PFS of the 46 pts was 15.44 months (95%CI: NA~NA). Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The common grade ≥3 treatment-related adverse events in 46 patients were hypertension (8.7%), neutrophil count decreased (4.3%), hyponatremia (4.3%), lymphocyte count decreased (4.3%), white blood cell count decreased (2.2%), platelet count decreased (2.2%), hand-foot syndrome (2.2%), hemoptysis (2.2%) and toothache (2.2%). Conclusions: The preliminary results highlighted that anlotinib plus TQB2450 as a first-line therapy for advanced ESCC showed encouraging efficacy and manageable safety profile. Furthermore, these conclusions required to be confirmed in subsequent trials. Clinical trial information: NCT05038813 .

Update results of anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

e16017 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might be a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Preliminary results were presented at the 2024 ASCO-GI Symposium (Abs 340), the consecutively updated results were presented in this report. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Dec 2023, a total of 27 patients were enrolled, 25 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 1 CR (4.0%), 18 PR (72.0%), 3 SD (12.0%) and 3 NE (12.0%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 76.0% (95%CI: 54.9%-90.6%), DCR was 88.0% (95%CI: 68.8%-97.5%). Median PFS of the 25 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 27 patients with the incidence &gt; 20% were anemia (40.7%), peripheral nerve toxicity (37.0) and white blood cell decreased (25.9%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were white blood cell decreased (7.4%), diarrhea (3.7%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (3.7%), glutamic oxalacetic transaminase increased (3.7%), hypertension (3.7%) and immune enteritis (3.7%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. And the conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials.

Survival Impact of Glucocorticoid Administration for Adverse Events During Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Combination Therapy in Patients with Previously Untreated Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

The impact of glucocorticoid administration for adverse events (AEs), including immune-related AEs, on the effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) combination therapy for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) remains unknown. To clarify the prognostic impact of glucocorticoid use for AEs during first-line ICI combination therapy for advanced RCC. We retrospectively evaluated data from 194 patients who received dual ICI combination therapy [i.e., immunotherapy (IO)-IO] or combinations of ICIs with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) as first-line therapy. The patients were divided into two groups according to the history of glucocorticoid administration in each treatment group. Survival based on glucocorticoid administration was assessed. A total of 101 (52.0%) and 93 (48.0%) patients received IO-IO and IO-TKI combination therapy, respectively. Glucocorticoids were administered to 46 (46%) and 22 (24%) patients in the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, respectively. In the IO-IO group, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were significantly longer in patients with glucocorticoid administration than in those without administration (median PFS: 14.4 versus 3.45 months, p = 0.0005; median OS: 77.6 versus 33.9 months, p = 0.0025). Multivariable analysis showed that glucocorticoid administration was an independent predictor of longer PFS (hazard ratio: 0.43, p = 0.0005) and OS (hazard ratio: 0.35, p = 0.0067) after adjustment for covariates. In the IO-TKI group, neither PFS nor OS significantly differed between patients treated with and without glucocorticoid administration (PFS: p = 0.0872, OS: p = 0.216). Glucocorticoid administration did not negatively impact the effectiveness of ICI combination therapy for RCC, prompting glucocorticoid treatment use when AEs develop.

In vitro interaction of naphthoquine with ivermectin, atovaquone, curcumin, and ketotifen in the asexual blood stage of Plasmodium falciparum 3D7.

Pharmacodynamic interaction between antimalarials is not only crucial for the development of new antimalarial combination therapies but also important for the appropriate clinical use of antimalarials. The significant synergism between curcumin and naphthoquine observed in this study suggests the potential value for further development of new antimalarial combination therapy. The finding of a decline in atovaquone potency in the presence of naphthoquine alerts to a possible risk of treatment or prophylaxis failure for atovaquone-proguanil following naphthoquine-containing therapies. The observation of antagonism between naphthoquine and ivermectin raised a need for concern about the applicability of naphthoquine-containing therapy in malaria-endemic areas with ivermectin mass drug administration deployed. Considering the role of atovaquone-proguanil as a major alternative when first-line artemisinin-based combination therapy is ineffective and the wide implementation of ivermectin mass drug administration in malaria-endemic countries, the above findings will be important for the appropriate clinical application of antimalarials involving naphthoquine-containing therapies.

Pharmacoeconomic evaluation of first-line combination therapy with immunotherapy drugs and platinum-containing chemotherapy in adult patients with metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: to evaluate the pharmacoeconomic efficacy of “atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin” drug combination compared to “pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin” combination in adult patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the first line of therapy.Material and methods. The modeling was applied for cost minimization analyzis of using compared therapy regimens with comparable efficacy, and to estimate the impact on the healthcare budget when increasing the proportion of patients in the target population receiving “atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin” combination. Published adjusted indirect comparison data were used in modeling. The calculations were based on the registered prices according to the state register of maximum selling prices.Results. The use of “atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin” combination instead of “pembrolizumab + pemetrexed + carboplatin” combination will decrease the direct medical costs of therapy per 1 patient for 2 years by 28,165.00 rubles (–0.4%). The budget impact analysis showed that an increase in the proportion of patients receiving “atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin” combination from 50% (current therapy practice) to 100% (considered therapy practice) will reduce the budget load for the population of 6,240 patients over 2 years by 256.1 million rubles (–0.64%).Conclusion. The results of pharmacoeconomic analysis demonstrated that the use of “atezolizumab + bevacizumab + paclitaxel + carboplatin” combination in first-line therapy for metastatic NSCLC is economically feasible and reduces the load on the budget compared to “pembrolizu- mab + pemetrexed + carboplatin” scheme.

Abstract PO2-16-10: Characterising HER2-low status in metastatic breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study of patients at a metropolitan cancer centre in Australia

Abstract Background: Traditionally, breast cancer subtyping has described patients as HER2-negative or HER2-positive, with the latter being those in whom HER2-directed therapies are utilised. A proportion of HER2-negative cancers can be classified as “HER2-low” as they express IHC 1+ or 2+ and are non-amplified on in-situ hybridisation (ISH). Until recently, our widely available HER2-targeted therapies have proven to be ineffective in this subtype. The DESTINY-BREAST04 trial (Modi et al, NEJM 2022) showed progression-free and overall survival efficacy of HER2-directed therapy using the antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) in HER2-low disease, suggesting a need to identify this population for selected therapy. This study evaluated a real-world population of metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated according to traditional breast cancer subtypes to determine the frequency of HER2-low histology, with a focus on selection of first-line therapy. Methods: This retrospective audit identified patients being treated for MBC at a single tertiary hospital (Austin Health in Melbourne, Australia) over a 3.5 year period. Patients were identified from an electronic database, with a date of last follow-up as August 2022. Medical records were interrogated for clinicopathological information including review of pathology reports for breast cancer subtypes. Traditional breast cancer subtypes were defined as (i) ER positive and HER2-negative (HER2 0 or 1+, or 2+ and non-amplified); (ii) HER2-positive (HER2 3+ and/or amplified) and (iii) TNBC (negative for ER and PgR, and HER2 0 or 1+, or 2+ and non-amplified). Selection and duration of first-line treatment for MBC was also recorded. Results: Between March 2018 and August 2022, 202 MBC patients were identified. Based on traditional subtypes, 126 (62%) were ER positive and HER2-negative, 46 (23%) were HER2-positive, 26 (13%) were TNBC and 4 (2%) were unknown. In the total population, 87 (43%) were classified as having HER2-low disease based on retrospective pathology reports. HER2-low represented 61% of ER positive, HER2-non amplified patients and 45% of TNBC patients. Metastatic specimen data was known for 172 cases and of these, 95 patients (55%) were re-biopsied on metastatic progression. This occurred more commonly with HER2-positive (81%) and ER positive HER2-negative (78%) primaries. The most common change in subtype was loss of ER, which occurred in 7 patients (3%). Changes in HER2 status occurred in 29 (14%) of patients, most commonly as either an increase from 1+ to 2+ or decrease from 1+ to 0. HER2-low status remained consistent for 67% of patients who underwent biopsy on recurrence. For patients with ER positive HER2-negative MBC, first-line combination therapy with a CDK4/6 inhibitor + AI was preferred (51%), followed by single agent endocrine therapy (30%) and chemotherapy (17%). The majority (84%) of HER2-positive patients received first-line dual HER2 therapy (trastuzumab and pertuzumab) with taxane chemotherapy. Half of TNBC patients received upfront chemotherapy, with physician preference being capecitabine (45%). There was no significant difference in PFS between the HER2-low vs. HER2-0 cohorts, for either ER positive or TNBC subtypes. No patients in this series were treated based on HER2-low definition due to no funded access to such therapies at the time. Conclusion: HER2-low has emerged as an identifier for patients who may respond to HER2-directed therapies using ADCs such as T-DXd. However, its clinical significance as a discrete clinical subtype remains uncertain. In this retrospective audit, HER2-low patients were identified in both ER positive and TNBC subtypes. Dynamic changes in HER2 staining occurred infrequently. Further evaluation is needed to address whether HER2-low expression provides any prognostic value and whether prospective reporting of HER2-low status may alter how these new HER2-directed therapies are used in future. Citation Format: Michelle Li, Belinda Yeo. Characterising HER2-low status in metastatic breast cancer: a real-world retrospective study of patients at a metropolitan cancer centre in Australia [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-16-10.

Abstract PO2-05-04: ELEVATE: A phase 1b/2, open-label, umbrella study evaluating elacestrant in various combinations in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC)

Abstract Background: ER+/HER2- breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent BC subtype. Endocrine therapy (ET) is the mainstay of treatment; however, development of resistance to this therapeutic approach is common in the metastatic setting. After progression on first-line treatment, both ET monotherapy and combination therapy options are available. Combinations such as everolimus + exemestane and alpelisib + fulvestrant can be associated with higher efficacy, but also significant toxicity with discontinuation rates around 25%. Also, for second-line treatment, pts who did not receive prior treatment with a CDK4/6i, the combination of fulvestrant with a CDK4/6i (palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib) are among the recommended treatment options for this pt population (NCCN, 2022). However, fulvestrant has low bioavailability and an IM injection burden. The crosstalk between the three pathways ER, PI3K/AKT/mTOR and cyclin-dependent kinases (CDK4/6) provide a rationale for the combination of elacestrant, a next-generation oral SERD, with inhibitors of these pathways that are natural targets to overcome endocrine resistance. The EMERALD trial reported significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) with elacestrant vs SOC ET in pts with ER+/HER2− ESR1 mutated (ESR1-mut) mBC following disease progression on prior ET (Bidard, 2022). Elacestrant was well tolerated with a manageable safety profile. Most adverse events, including nausea, were low-grade and consistent with other endocrine therapies. The replacement of the fulvestrant backbone with elacestrant in combination with targeted agents enabling oral-oral combinations is of therapeutic interest. Methods: ELEVATE (NCT05563220) is a phase 1b/2 clinical trial that will evaluate the safety and efficacy of elacestrant combined with alpelisib, everolimus, palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib. Eligible pts must be adults with confirmed ER+/HER2− advanced or mBC, &amp;gt; 1 measurable lesion as per RECIST v1.1, and adequate bone marrow or organ function. The main objectives for Phase 1b are to determine the RP2D of elacestrant combined with other targeted agents. The RP2D of elacestrant and abemaciclib will be determined in the ELECTRA study (NCT05386108). The Phase 2 portion will evaluate the efficacy of elacestrant combined with other study drugs for PFS; secondary objectives include PK of the various combinations, ORR, DoR, CBR, PFS, and OS. Here we report the initial dosing from the Phase 1b portion. Results: As of June 2023, 11 pts were enrolled in the phase 1b portion of the trial, cohort 1 for all combinations: 5 pts in the elacestrant and everolimus (300 mg elacestrant QD/everolimus 5 mg QD) and 3 pts in the elacestrant and alpelisib (300 mg elacestrant QD/alpelisib 250 mg QD) and 2 patients for palbociclib and 1 patient in the ribociclib combinations. Further patient accrual is expected in phase 1b cohorts of various combinations during the second half of 2023; both safety and PK data will be provided. Conclusion: In the Phase 1b portion of ELEVATE, elacestrant is being combined with various targeted agents enabling oral-oral combinations to determine a RP2D. Recruitment is actively ongoing; safety and PK results will be presented at the meeting from the completed phase 1b cohorts. Citation Format: Hope Rugo, Aditya Bardia, Javier Cortés, Giuseppe Curigliano, Erika Hamilton, Sara Hurvitz, Sibylle Loibl, Sara Tolaney, Virginia Kaklamani, Giulia Tonini, Shannon Matheny, Kathy Puvana Theall, Joyce O'Shaughnessy. ELEVATE: A phase 1b/2, open-label, umbrella study evaluating elacestrant in various combinations in patients (pts) with estrogen receptor-positive (ER+), HER2-negative (HER2-) locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer (mBC) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2023 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2023 Dec 5-9; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PO2-05-04.

Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating metastatic urothelial cancer.

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is an important treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. A lot of clinical evidence proved the survival benefits of ICI, but cost-effectiveness of the treatment remains unclear. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the ICIs treatment in different sequences among mUC patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed mUC patients who had been treated at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. These patients received chemotherapy with or without ICI treatment (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab, Durvalumab, or Avelumab). The patients were divided into three different groups: receiving chemotherapy alone, receiving a combination of first-line ICI and chemotherapy (ICI combination therapy), and receiving chemotherapy as the first-line treatment followed by second-line ICI therapy (Subsequent ICI therapy). The primary endpoint was cost per life day, while lifetime medical costs and overall survival were also evaluated. Results: The 74 enrolled patients had a median age of 67.0 years, with 62.2% being male. Of these patients, 23 had received chemotherapy only, while the remaining patients had received combined therapy with ICI in either first-line or as subsequent agents (37 patients had ever received atezolizumab, 18 pembrolizumab, 1 Durvalumab, 1 Nivolumab, and 1 Avelumab separately.). Fifty-five patients (74.3%, 55/74) received cisplatin amongst all the patients who underwent chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 27.5months (95% CI, 5.2-49.9) in the first-line ICI combination therapy group, and 8.9months (95% CI, 7.1-10.8) in the chemotherapy only. Median overall survival for the subsequent ICI therapy group was not reached. The median lifetime cost after metastatic UC diagnosis was USD 31,221. The subsequent ICI therapy group had significantly higher costs when compared with the ICI combination therapy group (155.8 USD per day, [IQR 99.0 to 220.5] v 97.8 USD per day, [IQR 60.8 to 159.19], p = 0.026). Higher insurance reimbursement expenses for the subsequent ICI therapy group were observed when compared with the ICI combination therapy group. Conclusion: Our real-world data suggests that first line use of ICI combined with chemotherapy demonstrates better cost-effectiveness and similar survival outcomes for mUC patients, when compared with subsequent ICI therapy after chemotherapy.

Soluble Immune Checkpoint Molecules as Predictors of Efficacy in Immuno-Oncology Combination Therapy in Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma.

Immuno-oncology (IO) combination therapy is the first-line treatment for advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, biomarkers for predicting the response to IO combination therapy are lacking. Here, we investigated the association between the expression of soluble immune checkpoint molecules and the therapeutic efficacy of IO combination therapy in advanced RCC. The expression of soluble programmed cell death-1 (sPD-1), soluble programmed cell death ligand-1 (sPD-L1), soluble PD-L2 (sPD-L2), and lymphocyte activation gene-3 (sLAG-3) was assessed in plasma samples from 42 patients with advanced RCC who received first-line IO combination therapy. All IMDC risk classifications were represented among the patients, including 14.3, 57.1, and 28.6% with favorable, intermediate, and poor risk, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that prior nephrectomy, sPD-L2 levels, and sLAG-3 levels were significant factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS), whereas multivariate analyses suggested that sPD-L2 and sLAG-3 levels were independent prognostic factors for PFS. In a univariate analysis of the overall survival, prior nephrectomy and sPD-L2 levels were significant factors; no significant differences were observed in the multivariate analysis. No significant correlation was observed between the sPD-L2 and sLAG-3 levels and PD-L2 and LAG-3 expression via immunohistochemistry. In conclusion, sPD-L2 and sLAG-3 expression may serve as a potential biomarker for predicting IO combination therapy efficacy.

Assessing availability, prices, and market share of quality-assured malaria ACT and RDT in the private retail sector in Nigeria and Uganda

BackgroundAn estimated 50% of suspected malaria cases in sub-Saharan Africa first seek care in the private sector, especially in private medicine retail outlets. Quality of care in these outlets is generally unknown but considered poor with many patients not receiving a confirmatory diagnosis or the recommended first-line artemisinin-based combination therapy (ACT). In 2010, a subsidy pilot scheme, the Affordable Medicines Facility malaria, was introduced to crowd out the use of monotherapies in favour of WHO-pre-qualified artemisinin-based combinations (WHO-PQ-ACTs) in the private health sector. The scheme improved the availability, market share, and cost of WHO-PQ-ACTs in countries like Nigeria and Uganda, but in 2018, the subsidies were halted in Nigeria and significantly reduced in Uganda. This paper presents findings from six retail audit surveys conducted from 2014 to 2021 in Nigeria and Uganda to assess whether the impact of subsidies on the price, availability, and market share of artemisinin-based combinations has been sustained after the subsidies were reduced or discontinued.MethodsSix independent retail audits were conducted in private medicine retail outlets, including pharmacies, drug shops, and clinics in Nigeria (2016, 2018, 2021), and Uganda (2014, 2019, 2020) to assess the availability, price, and market share of anti-malarials, including WHO-PQ-ACTs and non-WHO-PQ-ACTs, and malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs).ResultsBetween 2016 and 2021, there was a 57% decrease in WHO-PQ-ACT availability in Nigeria and a 9% decrease in Uganda. During the same period, non-WHO-PQ-ACT availability increased in Nigeria by 41% and by 34% in Uganda. The price of WHO-PQ-ACTs increased by 42% in Nigeria to $0.68 and increased in Uganda by 24% to $0.95. The price of non-WHO-PQ-ACTs decreased in Nigeria by 26% to $1.08 and decreased in Uganda by 64% to $1.23. There was a 76% decrease in the market share of WHO-PQ-ACTs in Nigeria and a 17% decrease in Uganda. Malaria RDT availability remained low throughout.ConclusionWith the reduction or termination of subsidies for WHO-PQ-ACTs in Uganda and Nigeria, retail prices have increased, and retail prices of non-WHO-PQ-ACTs decreased, likely contributing to a shift of higher availability and increased use of non-WHO-PQ-ACTs.

Anlotinib combined with penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line treatment for advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A single-arm, open-label phase II clinical trial.

340 Background: Recently, PD-1 blockades combined with dual chemotherapy in first-line setting exhibited encouraging efficacy for patients with ESCC. However, the safety profile of conventional dual chemotherapy remained unsatisfactory. Therefore, PD-1 blockades combined with anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and single chemotherapy regimen might be a promising strategy. Anlotinib, a novel multitarget TKI primarily targeting VEGFR1-3, demonstrated promising therapeutic activity as first-line combination therapy or second-line monotherapy for patients with ESCC in China clinically. Therefore, this study was designed to explore the efficacy and safety of anlotinib combined with penpulimab (PD-1 blockade) and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy in advanced ESCC. Methods: Patients with previously untreated metastatic or locally advanced ESCC were recruited and treated with anlotinib (12mg, po, d1~14, q3w) and penpulimab (200mg, iv, d1, q3w) plus nab-paclitaxel (220mg/m2, iv, d1, q3w) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The tumor response was assessed according to RECIST 1.1 using CT scans every two cycles. Adverse events were recorded by severity in accordance with the NCI CTC AE Version 5.0. The predefined sample size was 30. Primary endpoint was PFS and secondary endpoints included safety, ORR, DCR and OS. Results: From Jul 2022 to Aug 2023, a total of 23 patients were enrolled, 19 patients who had received first tumor response were included in this analysis. The best overall response indicated that there were 14 PR (73.7%), 2 SD (10.5%) and 3 NE (15.8%). Therefore, the preliminary ORR was 73.7% (95%CI: 48.8%-90.9%), DCR was 84.2% (95%CI: 60.4%-96.6%). Median PFS of the 19 patients was not yet reached. Additionally, safety profile exhibited that the regimen was tolerable. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events among the 23 patients with the incidence &gt;20% were leukopenia (30%) and anemia (30%). Common grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events were leukopenia (9%), glutamic-pyruvic transaminase was elevated (4%), glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase increased (4%), hypertension (4%) and diarrhea (4%). Conclusions: The combination of anlotinib plus penpulimab and nab-paclitaxel as first-line therapy for advanced ESCC demonstrated promising efficacy and manageable safety profile. The conclusions needed to be confirmed in subsequent trials.

Prognostic outcomes in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma receiving second-line treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitor following first-line immune-oncology combination therapy.

This study aimed to assess the prognostic outcomes in mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI following first-line IO combination therapy. This study retrospectively included 243 mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI after first-line IO combination therapy: nivolumab plus ipilimumab (n = 189, IO-IO group) and either pembrolizumab plus axitinib or avelumab plus axitinib (n = 54, IO-TKI group). Oncological outcomes between the two groups were compared, and prognostication systems were developed for these patients. In the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, the objective response rates to second-line TKI were 34.4% and 25.9% (p = 0.26), the median PFS periods were 9.7 and 7.1 months (p = 0.79), and the median OS periods after the introduction of second-line TKI were 23.1 and 33.5 months (p = 0.93), respectively. Among the several factors examined, non-CCRCC, high CRP, and low albumin levels were identified as independent predictors of both poor PFS and OS by multivariate analyses. It was possible to precisely classify the patients into 3 risk groups regarding both PFS and OS according to the positive numbers of the independent prognostic factors. Furthermore, the c-indices of this study were superior to those of previous systems as follows: 0.75, 0.64, and 0.61 for PFS prediction and 0.76, 0.70, and 0.65 for OS prediction by the present, IMDC, and MSKCC systems, respectively. There were no significant differences in the prognostic outcomes after introducing second-line TKI between the IO-IO and IO-TKI groups, and the histopathology, CRP and albumin levels had independent impacts on the prognosis in mRCC patients receiving second-line TKI, irrespective of first-line IO combination therapies.

Abstract B073: Understanding treatment response in pancreatic cancer: NetraAI provides genetic differentiation in FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine response

Abstract Pancreatic cancer is known as a “silent killer” due to vague symptoms, late diagnosis, rapid progression, and poor response to therapy. Due to the highly malignant nature of this disease, prolonging progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for patients is critical. Standard of care involves combination chemotherapy using FOLFIRINOX (FFX) or Gemcitabine with nab-paclitaxel (GnP). The COMPASS trial performed whole genome sequencing (WGS) and RNA sequencing (RNASeq) on pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) patients prior to FFX or GnP first-line combination therapy, finding molecular heterogeneity between patients and differing response to chemotherapy. Using the COMPASS trial dataset consisting of only 208 patients and NetraAI, a novel machine learning (ML) platform using a novel causal feature set discovery methodology, we explored generated hypotheses to differentiate causal factors that affect patient response to FFX and GnP. Differentiating FFX and GnP treatment response in stable disease patients revealed 3 distinct subpopulations with genetic differentiation related to neuron death and regulation, neurotrophin signaling, and neuron apoptotic processes. NetraAI identified genes driving patient subpopulations, such as LRRC8E, PTPRH, and UTG1A13p. Further investigation revealed that LRRC29 and CLEC19A distinguished a group of patients that responded well to FFX. LRRC29 relates to HOOK1, which negatively regulates epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and has been reported to be decreased in PDAC. Low HOOK1 and SHP2 expression in non-small cell lung cancer is associated with a good response to GnP, suggesting that chemotherapy response depends on the interaction of the chemotherapeutic agent and genetic factors involved in disease progression as opposed to the tumor type. These results suggest that LRRC29 expression can act as a biomarker to choose between GnP and FFX treatment. In this way, NetraAI's ability to generate explainable hypotheses around patient subpopulations can help oncologists personalize treatments and better understand clinical trial patient populations. By identifying distinct genetic signatures within patient datasets. By identifying unique molecular heterogeneity that explains differing responses to therapy, NetraAI is a powerful tool that can extract insights from multi-dimensional and highly heterogenous patient population datasets that can help to inform clinical trial enrichment decisions to improve the success of pivotal trials. This work has a significant impact on precision medicine and clinical trial de-risking, while identifying specific genes and pathways involved in patient response to therapy. Citation Format: Bessi Qorri, Mike Tsay, Josh Spiegel, Douglas Cook, Joseph Geraci. Understanding treatment response in pancreatic cancer: NetraAI provides genetic differentiation in FOLFIRINOX and gemcitabine response [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: Pancreatic Cancer; 2023 Sep 27-30; Boston, Massachusetts. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B073.

Actigraphy methodology in the Kids Mod PAH trial: Physical activity as a functional endpoint in pediatric clinical trials.

Pulmonary vasodilator treatment can improve hemodynamics, right ventricular function, symptoms, and survival in pediatric pulmonary hypertension (PH). However, clinical trial data are lacking due to many constraints. One major limitation is the lack of relevant trial endpoints reflective of hemodynamics or functional status in patients in whom standard exercise testing is impractical, unreliable, or not reproducible. The Kids Mod PAH trial (Mono- vs. Duo Therapy for Pediatric Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension) is an ongoing multicenter, Phase III, randomized, open-label, pragmatic trial to compare the safety and efficacy of first-line combination therapy (sildenafil and bosentan) to first-line monotherapy (sildenafil alone) in 100 pediatric patients with PH across North America. Investigators will measure participants' physical activity with a research-grade, wrist-worn actigraphy device at multiple time points as an exploratory secondary outcome. Vector magnitude counts per minute and activity intensity will be compared between the treatment arms. By directly and noninvasively measuring physical activity in the ambulatory setting, we aim to identify a novel, simple, inexpensive, and highly reproducible approach for quantitative assessment of exercise tolerance in pediatric PH. These data will increase the field's understanding of the effect of pulmonary vasodilator treatment on daily activity - a quantitative measure of functional status and wellbeing in pediatric PH and a potential primary outcome for future clinical trials in children with cardiopulmonary disorders.