First-line Therapy For Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Research Articles

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma response to immunotherapy: Report of two cases

Background: Immunotherapy has emerged as an improved systemic treatment in selected patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Response rates are achieved in only about a third of patients and survival remains somehow limited, however, occasionally complete response is observed allowing liver resection. The current standard first-line therapy for advanced HCC is a combination of the immune checkpoint and VEGF inhibitors. Herein we report two patients who underwent liver resection after exhibiting good (1 patient) or complete (1 patient) response to this systemic therapy.

CDK4/6 inhibitors improve the anti-tumor efficacy of lenvatinib in hepatocarcinoma cells.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most frequent primary liver cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment options. Considering that alterations of the CDK4/6-cyclin D-Rb pathway occur frequently in HCC, we tested the efficacy of two CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib and ribociclib, in combination with lenvatinib, a multi-kinase inhibitor approved as first-line therapy for advanced HCC, in a panel of HCC Rb-expressing cell lines. The simultaneous drug combinations showed a superior anti-proliferative activity as compared with single agents or sequential schedules of treatment, either in short or in long-term experiments. In addition, the simultaneous combination of abemaciclib with lenvatinib reduced 3D cell growth, and impaired colony formation and cell migration. Mechanistically, these growth-inhibitory effects were associated with a stronger down-regulation of c-myc protein expression. Depending on the HCC cell model, reduced activation of MAPK, mTORC1/p70S6K or src/FAK signaling was also observed. Abemaciclib combined with lenvatinib arrested the cells in the G1 cell cycle phase, induced p21 accumulation, and promoted a stronger increase of cellular senescence, associated with elevation of β-galactosidase activity and accumulation of ROS, as compared with single treatments. After drug withdrawal, the capacity of forming colonies was significantly impaired, suggesting that the anti-tumor efficacy of abemaciclib and lenvatinib combination was persistent.Our pre-clinical results demonstrate the effectiveness of the simultaneous combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with lenvatinib in HCC cell models, suggesting that this combination may be worthy of further investigation as a therapeutic approach for the treatment of advanced HCC.

Addition of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients (pts) with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who progress on first-line immunotherapy (IO).

e16193 Background: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is now standard first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Early phase trials in HCC and phase III trials in other solid tumors testing IO and TKI have shown greater antitumor activity with the combination than with either agent alone. Cancer and vascular endothelial cells release VEGF, which not only increases angiogenesis, promoting tumor growth, but also induces an immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Preclinical studies suggest that TKIs with anti-VEGF activity have immunomodulatory potential, enabling the infiltration and activation of effector T cells to the TME. Experimental models of HCC with combination of IO plus TKI also reverted immune escape mechanisms mediated by β-catenin, Wnt, and TGFβ activation and by Treg or neutrophil infiltration. At our institution, pts who were treated with IO alone in the front line often had a TKI added on progression of disease (PD). We aimed to evaluate whether the addition of a TKI could rescue IO failure. Methods: We conducted an IRB-approved retrospective chart review of pts with unresectable HCC at Mount Sinai Health System who received IO from 1/2017 to 6/2021 and who subsequently received a TKI on PD. We assessed the objective response rate (ORR), median progression-free survival (mPFS) and overall survival (mOS). Follow-up CT/MRI imaging studies were conducted every 2-3 months after addition of TKI. Results: Of 277 pts who received first-line IO during the study period, 46 evaluable pts subsequently had TKIs added to IO upon PD. Pts were predominantly male (37/46), with median age 63 years, and 38 had cirrhosis. Etiologies of HCC were as follows: 9 HBV, 22 HCV, 15 alcohol-related, 7 NASH-associated. All pts received first-line nivolumab. TKIs added were lenvatinib (44/46) and sorafenib (2). At the start of IO, most pts (31/46) had Child Pugh class A liver disease and performance status ECOG 0 (31/46). TKIs were added upon PD and after a median of 5.8 months (range 2.1-28.1 months) from IO initiation. ORR of IO plus TKI was 15% (7/46; 2 complete responses and 5 partial responses). 16 pts had stable disease, and 13 had PD. Among the 11/46 pts who initially responded to first-line IO, 2 achieved a response with TKI. There were 5 responses among the 35/46 non-responders to first-line IO. TKI-related grade 3-4 adverse events, including liver toxicity, rash, and encephalopathy, led to discontinuation in 7/46 pts. mOS after adding TKI was 9.5 months (95% CI: 6.1-13.7) and mPFS was 5.4 months (95% CI: 3.6-9.7). The mOS and mPFS of adding TKI after PD did not differ between IO initial responders and non-responders. Overall, mOS from IO initiation was 17.6 months (95% CI: 14.5-24.4). Conclusions: Adding a TKI after PD on single agent IO in pts with advanced HCC did not add a signal of clinical benefit compared with reported outcomes from second-line TKIs alone.

Suppressors of Cytokine Signaling and Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Simple SummaryHepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common malignancy worldwide. The HCC generally develops in the liver of patients already suffering from chronic liver disease. There have been significant advances in both the curative and palliative treatment of HCC. Although liver resection is a curative treatment for HCC, its indication is often limited due to an impaired liver function reservoir. There is still a need to understand how to control liver regeneration after resection and find better cancer immunotherapy and anticancer drugs for advanced HCC. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) negatively regulate cytokine signaling related to cell proliferation, differentiation, and immune response; therefore, SOCS are thought to play an important role in HCC development and liver regeneration. Cytokines are secreted soluble glycoproteins that regulate cellular growth, proliferation, and differentiation. Suppressors of cytokine signaling (SOCS) proteins negatively regulate cytokine signaling and form a classical negative feedback loop in the signaling pathways. There are eight members of the SOCS family. The SOCS proteins are all comprised of a loosely conserved N-terminal domain, a central Src homology 2 (SH2) domain, and a highly conserved SOCS box at the C-terminus. The role of SOCS proteins has been implicated in the regulation of cytokines and growth factors in liver diseases. The SOCS1 and SOCS3 proteins are involved in immune response and inhibit protective interferon signaling in viral hepatitis. A decreased expression of SOCS3 is associated with advanced stage and poor prognosis of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). DNA methylations of SOCS1 and SOCS3 are found in HCC. Precise regulation of liver regeneration is influenced by stimulatory and inhibitory factors after partial hepatectomy (PH), in particular, SOCS2 and SOCS3 are induced at an early time point after PH. Evidence supporting the important role of SOCS signaling during liver regeneration also supports a role of SOCS signaling in HCC. Immuno-oncology drugs are now the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. The SOCS can be potential targets for HCC in terms of cell proliferation, cell differentiation, and immune response. In this literature review, we summarize recent findings of the SOCS family proteins related to HCC and liver diseases.

Impact of Exogenous Treatment with Histidine on Hepatocellular Carcinoma Cells.

Simple SummarySorafenib (Nexavar@) is the only currently approved anti-cancer drug for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). However, despite the development of strategies combining sorafenib with other cytotoxic chemotherapeutic agents to overcome sorafenib resistance, clinical trial results are still disappointing. In this study, we examined the enhancement of tumor responses to sorafenib by exogenous histidine treatment.Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related deaths worldwide. Sorafenib, a multi-kinase inhibitor, is the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. However, long-term exposure to sorafenib often results in reduced sensitivity and the development of resistance. Although various amino acids have been shown to contribute to cancer initiation and progression, little is known about the effects of histidine, a dietary essential amino acid that is partially taken up via histidine/large neutral amino acid transporter (LAT1), on cancer cells. In this study, we evaluated the effects of histidine on HCC cells and sensitivity to sorafenib. Remarkably, we found that exogenous histidine treatment induced a reduction in the expression of tumor markers related to glycolysis (GLUT1 and HK2), inflammation (STAT3), angiogenesis (VEGFB and VEGFC), and stem cells (CD133). In addition, LAT1 expression was downregulated in HCC tumor regions with high expression of GLUT1, CD133, and pSTAT3, which are known to induce sorafenib resistance. Finally, we demonstrated that combined treatment with sorafenib and histidine could be a novel therapeutic strategy to enhance the sensitivity to sorafenib, thereby improving long-term survival in HCC.

Paradigm shift in the treatment options of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is prevalent worldwide with suboptimal therapeutic outcomes. The advancement of therapeutic options and the development of new systemic therapies expand the armamentarium to tackle HCC. Treatment options should be provided based on the hierarchy of efficacy in a multidisciplinary perspective, instead of the traditional stage-guided scheme. In advanced HCC, lenvatinib has a comparable efficacy as sorafenib for the first-line therapy of HCC; while regorafenib, cabozantinib, and ramucirumab have been approved as second-line therapy after the failure of sorafenib. Immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy prolongs response rate and survival and enables long-term cure. Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is superior to sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Several emerging regimens by the combination of various systemic therapies are currently under clinical trials. Systemic therapy may be used in the neoadjuvant, adjuvant or even as initial therapy for intermediate-stage HCC. The paradigm shift of HCC treatment will improve patient outcomes.

Donafenib Versus Sorafenib in First-Line Treatment of Unresectable or Metastatic Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Randomized, Open-Label, Parallel-Controlled Phase II-III Trial

PURPOSEDonafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor and a deuterated sorafenib derivative, has shown efficacy in phase Ia and Ib hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) studies. This study compared the efficacy and safety of donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC.PATIENTS AND METHODSThis open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicenter phase II-III trial enrolled patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a Child-Pugh score ≤ 7, and no prior systemic therapy from 37 sites across China. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral donafenib (0.2 g) or sorafenib (0.4 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary end point was overall survival (OS), tested for noninferiority and superiority. Efficacy was primarily assessed in the full analysis set (FAS), and safety was assessed in all treated patients.RESULTSBetween March 21, 2016, and April 16, 2018, 668 patients (intention-to-treat) were randomly assigned to donafenib and sorafenib treatment arms; the FAS included 328 and 331 patients, respectively. Median OS was significantly longer with donafenib than sorafenib treatment (FAS; 12.1 v 10.3 months; hazard ratio, 0.831; 95% CI, 0.699 to 0.988; P = .0245); donafenib also exhibited superior OS outcomes versus sorafenib in the intention-to-treat population. The median progression-free survival was 3.7 v 3.6 months (P = .0570). The objective response rate was 4.6% v 2.7% (P = .2448), and the disease control rate was 30.8% v 28.7% (FAS; P = .5532). Drug-related grade ≥ 3 adverse events occurred in significantly fewer patients receiving donafenib than sorafenib (125 [38%] v 165 [50%]; P = .0018).CONCLUSIONDonafenib showed superiority over sorafenib in improving OS and has favorable safety and tolerability in Chinese patients with advanced HCC, showing promise as a potential first-line monotherapy for these patients.

Tumor Immune Microenvironment and Immunosuppressive Therapy in Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Review.

Liver cancer has the fourth highest mortality rate of all cancers worldwide, with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) being the most prevalent subtype. Despite great advances in systemic therapy, such as molecular-targeted agents, HCC has one of the worst prognoses due to drug resistance and frequent recurrence and metastasis. Recently, new therapeutic strategies such as cancer immunosuppressive therapy have prolonged patients’ lives, and the combination of an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) and VEGF inhibitor is now positioned as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Since the efficacy of ICIs depends on the tumor immune microenvironment, it is necessary to elucidate the immune environment of HCC to select appropriate ICIs. In this review, we summarize the findings on the immune microenvironment and immunosuppressive approaches focused on monoclonal antibodies against cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated protein 4 and programmed cell death protein 1 for HCC. We also describe ongoing treatment modalities, including adoptive cell transfer-based therapies and future areas of exploration based on recent literature. The results of pre-clinical studies using immunological classification and animal models will contribute to the development of biomarkers that predict the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy and aid in the selection of appropriate strategies for HCC treatment.

Abstract No. 124 Systemic therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: where are we heading?

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth leading cause of cancer in the world and third, in cancer related mortality. Only 20% HCC are early HCCs that are eligible for therapies such as resection, liver transplantation, and local ablation due to advanced stage, tumor burden, lack of liver donors and liver dysfunction. The majority of HCCs are treated with palliative therapy, which includes Transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and systemic therapy, while transarterial radioembolization still struggles to find a place in evidence-based treatment. In this study we explore the advances made in systemic therapy for advanced HCC, especially since the approval of sorafenib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor, including the evolution and emerging field of immunotherapy in the last decade through relevant literature. We reviewed recently published studies in PubMed and data presented in the last decade discussing both advances and failures in the systemic treatment of HCC. After Sorafenib demonstrated improved overall survival (OS) in SHARP and Asia Pacific trials over placebo many other phase III trials have been conducted with other multi kinase inhibitors like sunitinib, brivanib and linifanib; none of which yielded significant results compared to sorafenib. Lenvatinib has been approved as first-line therapy for advanced HCC due to increased response rate, progression free similar survival outcomes like sorafenib. Tyrosine kinase inhibitors Regorafenib and Cabozantinib have shown significant improvement in survival, in RESORCE and CELESTIAL trials, respectively, as second-line treatment after sorafenib failures, radiological progression or intolerance in patients. Ramucirumab an anti VEGF monoclonal IgG antibody, studied in REACH trial demonstrated a potential survival benefit for patients with AFP ≥ 400ng/dL and Immune checkpoint inhibitors, like nivolumab and pembrolizumab although showing promising response rates and minimal adverse effects in phase II trial failed to demonstrate an improved OS in phase III trial. Despite clinical trials where combination of TACE and molecular targeted agents have failed till date, combination of TACE with sorafenib indicated success in TACTICS trial and the outcome of various ongoing combination trials with molecular targeted agents and immune checkpoint inhibitors is eagerly awaited. While a lot of progress has been made in increasing survival of patients with advanced HCC, the ongoing trials will further change the treatment paradigm significantly for HCC.

An Underdiagnosed Hypothyroidism and Its Clinical Significance in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma.

Many systemic therapies for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) may cause hypothyroidism; however, in these patients, hypothyroidism prevalence before therapy and its prognostic impact remain unclear. We previously established a prospective cohort of patients who received sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. No patients had been clinically diagnosed with hypothyroidism before or during sorafenib treatment. We retrospectively determined the levels of thyrotropin and free thyroxine before initiation of systemic therapy. Hypothyroidism was defined as thyrotropin level higher than the upper limit of the normal range. Among patients with hypothyroidism, free thyroxine level less than the lower normal range was defined as overt hypothyroidism, and free thyroxine level within the normal range was defined as subclinical hypothyroidism. In total, 79 patients were enrolled; of them, 16 (20%) had hypothyroidism (overt hypothyroidism, 10; subclinical hypothyroidism, 6). Patients with hypothyroidism, compared with those without hypothyroidism, were more likely to be older than 65 years (56% vs. 29%, p = .037), have a serum α-fetoprotein level of >400 ng/mL (81% vs. 52%, p = .037), and have a significantly poorer overall survival (OS; median, 5.5 vs. 11.6 months, p = .043). After adjusting for other potential prognostic factors, hypothyroidism remained an independent predictor for poorer OS (hazard ratio, 2.53, p = .018). Patients with overt hypothyroidism and subclinical hypothyroidism exhibited similarly poor OS (p = .768). Underdiagnosis of hypothyroidism in patients with advanced HCC was common. Hypothyroidism, whether overt or subclinical, is associated with poor prognosis of advanced HCC. The results of this study showed the underdiagnosis of hypothyroidism in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and its influence on prognosis. These findings implied the importance of thyroid function check before initiation of systemic therapy for patients with advanced HCC.

982P Comparison of donafenib and sorafenib as advanced hepatocellular carcinoma first-line treatments: Subgroup analysis of an open-label, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicentre phase II/III trial

Donafenib, a deuterated sorafenib derivative, has demonstrated efficacy and safety in phase Ia/Ib studies in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This phase II/III trial assessed efficacy of donafenib to determine noninferiority/superiority vs sorafenib as a first-line therapy for advanced HCC.

Donafenib versus sorafenib as first-line therapy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: An open-label, randomized, multicenter phase II/III trial.

4506 Background: Sorafenib is still the standard first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Donafenib, a novel multikinase inhibitor, showed potential benefits in a previous phase Ib study in HCC. Methods: In this open-label, randomized phase II/III trial (ZGDH3), patients with unresectable or metastatic HCC, a Child-Pugh liver function score ≤ 7, and no prior systemic therapy were enrolled from 37 sites across China and randomized (1:1) to receive oral donafenib (0.2 g) or sorafenib (0.4 g) twice daily until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Efficacy analysis was primarily based on the full analysis set (FAS). Results: Between March 2016 and April 2018, 668 patients were randomized (donafenib, 334; sorafenib, 334) and included in the intention-to-treat (ITT) set, of whom 659 were analysed by FAS (328 vs 331). Donafenib was associated with a significantly longer median OS than sorafenib in both FAS (12.1 months vs 10.3 months, hazard ratio 0.831, 95% confidence interval 0.699–0.988, p = 0.0363) and ITT (12.0 months vs 10.1 months, 0.839, 0.706–0.996, p = 0.0446). There were no significant differences in median progression-free survival (3.7 months vs 3.6 months, p = 0.2824), objective response rate (4.6% vs 2.7%, p = 0.2448), and disease control rate (30.8% vs 28.7%, p = 0.5532). Grade 3 or worse adverse events (AEs) occurred in 191 (57.4%) and 224 (67.5%) patients ( p = 0.0082), respectively, and AEs of special interest and those leading to treatment interruption occurred in 287 (86.2%) vs 309 (93.1%, p = 0.0049) and 101 (30.3%) vs 141 (42.5%, p = 0.0013). A numerically lower number of patients reported serious AEs (55 [16.5%] vs 67 [20.2%], p = 0.2307) with donafenib. Common AEs with donafenib included hand-foot skin reaction (50.5%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (40.5%), blood bilirubin increased (39.0%), platelet count decreased (37.8%), and diarrhea (36.6%). Conclusions: Donafenib significantly improves OS over sorafenib with favourable safety and tolerability. Donafenib is a promising superior first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Funding: Zelgen. Clinical trial information: NCT02645981 .

Low-Dose Sorafenib Acts as a Mitochondrial Uncoupler and Ameliorates Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis

Nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH) is becoming one of the leading causes of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Sorafenib is the only first-line therapy for advanced HCC despite its serious adverse effects. Here, we report that at an equivalent of approximately one-tenth the clinical dose for HCC, sorafenib treatment effectively prevents the progression of NASH in both mice and monkeys without any observed significant adverse events. Mechanistically, sorafenib's benefit in NASH is independent of its canonical kinase targets in HCC, but involves the induction of mild mitochondrial uncoupling and subsequent activation of AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK). Collectively, our findings demonstrate a previously unappreciated therapeutic effect and signaling mechanism of low-dose sorafenib treatment in NASH. We envision that this new therapeutic strategy for NASH has the potential to translate into a beneficial anti-NASH therapy with fewer adverse events than is observed in the drug's current use in HCC.

Is the era of sorafenib over? A review of the literature.

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the most severe diseases worldwide. For the different stages of HCC, there are different clinical treatment strategies, such as surgical therapy for the early stage, and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) and selective internal radiation therapy (SIRT) for intermediate-stage disease. Systemic treatment, which uses mainly targeted drugs, is the standard therapy against advanced HCC. Sorafenib is an important first-line therapy for advanced HCC. As a classically effective drug, sorafenib can increase overall survival markedly. However, it still has room for improvement because of the heterogeneity of HCC and acquired resistance. Scientists have reported the acquired sorafenib resistance is associated with the anomalous expression of certain genes, most of which are also related with HCC onset and development. Combining sorafenib with inhibitors targeting these genes may be an effective treatment. Combined treatment may not only overcome drug resistance, but also inhibit the expression of carcinoma-related genes. This review focuses on the current status of sorafenib in advanced HCC, summarizes the inhibitors that can combine with sorafenib in the treatment against HCC, and provides the rationale for clinical trials of sorafenib in combination with other inhibitors in HCC. The era of sorafenib in the treatment of HCC is far from over, as long as we find better methods of medication.

Lenvatinib (len) plus pembrolizumab (pembro) for the first-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC): Phase 3 LEAP-002 study.

TPS4152 Background: Len, an inhibitor of VEGF receptors 1-3, FGF receptors 1-4, PDGF receptor α, RET, and KIT, is approved for first-line treatment of unresectable HCC (uHCC) based on the open-label phase 3 REFLECT study in which len showed noninferior overall survival (OS) and significantly improved objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and time-to-progression (TTP) vs sorafenib. In the phase 2 KEYNOTE-224 study of pembro (a PD-1 inhibitor) as second-line treatment of advanced HCC, pembro showed meaningful clinical efficacy in pts previously treated with sorafenib, with median PFS 4.9 mo, median OS 12.9 mo, and a manageable safety profile. In results from the phase 1b KEYNOTE-524 trial, len+pembro was well-tolerated, with promising antitumor activity in pts with uHCC. LEAP-002 is a phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of len+pembro vs len+placebo as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: Eligible pts are ≥18 y and have HCC confirmed by radiology, histology, or cytology; ECOG PS 0/1; BCLC stage C or stage B disease not amenable to locoregional therapy or curative treatment approach; CP class A liver score within 7 days before study; and ≥1 measurable lesion by RECIST v1.1. Pts with past or ongoing HCV infection and those with controlled HBV are eligible. 750 pts will be randomized 1:1 to receive len 12 mg (body weight [BW] ≥60 kg) or 8 mg (BW <60 kg) orally once daily plus pembro 200 mg or placebo IV Q3W. Pembro and len will be administered until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity, with a maximum 35 cycles for pembro. Stratification will be by geographic region (Asia vs Japan and Western regions); macroscopic portal vein invasion or extrahepatic spread or both (yes or no); alpha fetoprotein ≤400 ng/mL vs >400 ng/mL; and ECOG PS 0/1. Primary end points are PFS per RECIST v1.1 by blinded independent central review (BICR) and OS. Secondary end points are ORR, duration of response, disease control rate, and TTP per RECIST v1.1 by BICR, efficacy per modified RECIST, pharmacokinetics, and safety. Imaging assessments will be performed Q9W on study. AEs will be graded per CTCAE v4.0 and monitored up to 90 days after last dose. Clinical trial information: NCT03713593.

Abstract 4728: Plasma interleukin-6 level predicts prognosis of patients who received sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma

Abstract Background: No biomarker has been proven to predict the treatment outcomes of sorafenib, the only approved first-line therapy for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored predictive and prognostic values of plasma interleukin (IL)-6 levels for patients who received sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: This study had 2 patient cohorts. The exploration cohort consisted of patients who were previously enrolled in a phase 2 clinical trial that examined sorafenib with tegafur/uracil as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. The validation cohort consisted of patients who received sorafenib alone as first-line therapy for advanced HCC under reimbursement of National Health Insurance of Taiwan. Pretreatment plasma IL-6 levels were determined. We used the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve in the exploration cohort to determine the best cut point for IL-6 levels to predict overall survival (OS). We then confirmed the cut point in the validation cohort. Results: There were 55 and 73 patients in the exploration and validation cohort, respectively. In the exploration cohort, there was no complete response but 3 (6%) partial response. The median OS was 8.1 months. In the validation cohort, there was no complete response but 7 (10%) partial response. The median OS was 10.3 months. In the exploration cohort, we found 4.28 pg/ml was the best cut point in defining high and low IL-6 levels because it could differentiate OS (p = 0.042) with the best sensitivity and specificity. Applying the cut point on the validation cohort, patients with high pretreatment plasma IL-6 levels, compared with patients with low IL-6 levels, exhibited significantly poorer OS (median, 8.0 vs. 13.9 months, p = 0.031). After adjusting for age, gender, hepatitis etiology, tumor characteristics, α-fetoprotein level, performance status, and prior treatment, a high plasma IL-6 level remained an independent predictor for poor OS (hazard ratio 2.594, p = 0.005). By contrast, the plasma IL-6 level was not associated with progression-free survival, treatment response, disease control, or other patient characteristics. Conclusion: High pretreatment plasma IL-6 level predicted prognosis of patients who received sorafenib as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Citation Format: Yu-Yun Shao, Hang Lin, Yong-Shi Li, Ying-Hui Lee, Ho-Min Chen, Ann-Lii Cheng, Chih-Hung Hsu. Plasma interleukin-6 level predicts prognosis of patients who received sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 4728. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-4728

High Serum Transforming Growth Factor-β1 Levels Predict Outcome in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients Treated with Sorafenib.

The TGF-β signaling pathway is crucial in the progression and metastasis of malignancies. We investigated whether the serum TGF-β1 level was related to the outcomes of patients treated with sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We selected patients who had received sorafenib-containing regimens as first-line therapy for advanced HCC between 2007 and 2012. Serum TGF-β1 levels were measured and correlated with the treatment outcomes. The expression TGF-β1 and the sensitivity to sorafenib were examined in HCC cell lines. Ninety-one patients were included; 62 (68%) were hepatitis B virus surface antigen (+), and 11 (12%) were anti-hepatitis C virus (+). High (≥ median) pretreatment serum TGF-β1 levels (median 13.7 ng/mL; range, 3.0-41.8) were associated with high α-fetoprotein levels, but not with age, gender, or disease stage. Patients with high pretreatment serum TGF-β1 levels exhibited significantly shorter progression-free survival (median, 2.5 vs. 4.3 months; P = 0.022) and overall survival (median 5.6 vs. 11.6 months; P = 0.029) than did patients with low serum TGF-β1 levels. Compared with pretreatment levels, the serum TGF-β1 levels were significantly increased at disease progression (n = 29, P = 0.010). In preclinical models of HCC, higher TGF-β1 expression levels were associated with poorer sensitivity to sorafenib. High pretreatment serum TGF-β1 levels were associated with poor prognoses, and increased serum TGF-β1 levels were associated with the disease progression of advanced HCC patients. TGF-β pathway may be explored as a therapeutic target for advanced HCC.

Tumor c-Met expression and prognosis of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with sorafenib.

317 Background: Overexpression of c-Met signaling has been associated with development and progression of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). We explored the prognostic role of tumor c-Met expression in patients with advanced HCC. Methods: Patients who had received sorafenib alone as first-line therapy for advanced HCC and had available archival tumor tissues were enrolled. Expression of total c-Met was determined by immunohistochemical staining using CONFIRM anti-total c-MET (SP44) rabbit monoclonal primary antibody (Ventana) on the BenchMark ULTRA staining platform. We evaluated c-Met expression by H scores and by a clinical score as defined in the table. Results: The study enrolled 62 patients, all with Child-Pugh class A status. The HCC etiology was hepatitis B in 48 patients, and hepatitis C in 12 patents; 57 had BCLC disease; 40 had extrahepatic metastasis, and 37 had macrovascular invasion. Clinical scores of c-Met were 0 in 30 (48%) patients, 1 in 31 (50%) patients, 2 in 1 (2%) patients, and 3 in 0 patients. Patients with different clinical scores of c-Met had similar PFS (p = 0.821) or OS (p = 0.533). The median membranous H score and cytoplasmic score were 32.5 and 5, respectively. Patients with higher (≥ median) and lower c-Met membranous H scores or cytoplasmic H scores also had similar PFS and OS. Conclusions: High c-Met expression was rare in this advanced HCC cohort. Tumor expression of c-Met had no obvious associations with the prognosis of advanced HCC. (This study was supported by National Science Council, Taiwan (NSC-102-2314-B-002-120, NSC-103-2314-B-002-181-MY2, NSC-103-2314-B-002-092)). [Table: see text]

Treatment Efficacy Differences of Sorafenib for Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials

Objectives: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a heterogeneous disease. We explored whether any specific subgroups of patients may gain more survival benefits from sorafenib as the first-line therapy for advanced HCC. Methods: PubMed and the Cochrane library were searched for phase III clinical trials that compared sorafenib with other treatments as first-line therapy for advanced HCC. We retrieved data from the published articles and then calculated synthesized hazard ratios (HRs) of overall mortality for patients of different subgroups, using patients who received other treatments as the reference. Results: Four phase III clinical trials comparing sorafenib with other treatments were included in this study. The HRs were not significantly different between patients from various geographic regions (p = 0.183), patients with different Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance statuses (p = 0.699), or patients with different tumor involvement (p = 0.221). By contrast, the synthesized HR for hepatitis C virus (HCV)+ patients was 0.65 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.53-0.80], which was significantly lower than that for HCV- patients (0.87, 95% CI 0.79-0.96, p = 0.013). Conclusions: As the first-line therapy for advanced HCC, sorafenib might provide more survival benefits to HCV+ patients than to HCV- patients.

The Germline BIM Deletion Polymorphism Is Not Associated with the Treatment Efficacy of Sorafenib in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Objectives: A germline BIM deletion polymorphism has been proposed to predict a poor treatment efficacy of certain kinase inhibitors. The current study aimed to explore whether the BIM deletion polymorphism predicts the treatment efficacy of sorafenib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Methods: All patients who were enrolled in clinical trials to receive sorafenib-containing regimens as first-line therapy for advanced HCC and consented to providing peripheral blood samples were included. Polymerase chain reaction followed by gel electrophoresis was used to detect the germline BIM deletion polymorphism. Results: A total of 89 patients were enrolled; 69 (77%) patients had chronic hepatitis B infection, and 18 (20%) had chronic hepatitis C infection. The heterozygous BIM deletion polymorphism was identified in 9 (10%) patients. Patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism had similar response rates (11 vs. 6%) and disease control rates (56 vs. 61%). The time to progression, progression-free survival, and overall survival were similar between patients with and without the BIM deletion polymorphism. After adjusting for basic clinicopathologic variables and treatment regimens, the BIM polymorphism still could not predict treatment outcomes. Conclusions: The BIM deletion polymorphism was not associated with the treatment efficacy of sorafenib for advanced HCC.