First-line Maintenance Therapy Research Articles

Abstract PR001: Targeting mRNA methyltransferase in RNA-dependent DNA repair in cancer therapy

Abstract The treatment of many solid tumors presents significant challenges with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and the limited effectiveness of immunotherapy. Targeted therapy offers a promising approach, yet the lack of validated targets limits its applicability across the spectrum of solid tumors. Our past studies have revealed that an R-loop and mRNA-dependent DNA repair (RDDR) pathway, induced by damage at the transcribed regions of the genome, contributes to cell survival and drug resistance in cancer cells. This is particularly due to the high levels of transcription and DNA damage in these cells. We identified the RNA methyltransferase TRDMT1 as the primary modifier of mRNA methyl-5-cytosine in the RDDR pathway. Overcoming technical difficulties in monitoring RNA modifications, we developed the first TRDMT1 inhibitor (TRDMT1i) using in-house built cell-based and in vitro assays. We have identified highly potent and specific lead compounds that significantly reduce TRDMT1 activity at nanomolar concentrations. Our current lead TRDMT1 inhibitors meets most of the criteria that are required for optimal lead. Initial assessments involving the screening of normal and cancer cell lines, xenograft models, and patient specimens indicate that TRDMT1i sensitizes tumors with genomic instability when used as monotherapy. We aim to develop TRDMT1i as an investigational new drug (IND) for future clinical trials, initially targeting ovarian cancer as a monotherapy or in combination therapy for first-line maintenance and systematic therapy. Our goal is to pioneer the discovery of the RDDR pathway, leading to the development of innovative platforms and next-generation medications to revolutionize the targeting of mRNA modifications in cancer treatment. Citation Format: Li Lan. Targeting mRNA methyltransferase in RNA-dependent DNA repair in cancer therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference in Cancer Research: RNAs as Drivers, Targets, and Therapeutics in Cancer; 2024 Nov 14-17; Bellevue, Washington. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2024;23(11_Suppl):Abstract nr PR001.

Efficacy of subsequent therapies in patients with advanced ovarian cancer who relapse after first-line olaparib maintenance: results of the PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 trial

BackgroundUse of first-line PARP inhibitor maintenance therapy is increasing in advanced ovarian cancer. Understanding the efficacy of first subsequent therapy (FST) in patients experiencing disease progression in the first-line setting is important to optimize post-progression treatments. We evaluated the efficacy of FST in patients from PAOLA-1/ENGOT-ov25 (NCT02477644) who received first-line olaparib maintenance. Patients and methodsThis post hoc analysis evaluated the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy following disease progression by assessing time from FST to second subsequent therapy (SST) according to whether progression occurred during versus after first-line olaparib maintenance and FST type. A multivariate Cox model was used in the olaparib plus bevacizumab arm to identify prognostic factors influencing the efficacy of subsequent chemotherapy. ResultsOf 806 randomized patients, 544 (67.5%) progressed and received subsequent chemotherapy. The median time from FST to SST was shorter in patients in the olaparib plus bevacizumab arm who progressed during first-line olaparib maintenance (6.1 months) than in those who progressed after first-line olaparib maintenance (11.4 months). Multivariate analysis indicated that progression after (versus during) first-line olaparib maintenance influenced time from FST to SST (hazard ratio 0.65, 95% CI 0.50-0.84; P=0.0011) independently of platinum-free interval or clinical risk. Among patients who progressed and received platinum-based chemotherapy with a PARP inhibitor as FST, the efficacy of subsequent therapies was also dependent upon whether progression occurred during versus after first-line olaparib maintenance. ConclusionsThese results suggest that the timing of disease progression relative to first-line olaparib maintenance may impact the efficacy of subsequent platinum-based chemotherapy. Although results should be interpreted with caution, across all subgroups, including patients who received platinum-based chemotherapy with PARP inhibitor rechallenge as FST, the median time from FST to SST was longer if progression occurred after versus during first-line olaparib maintenance.

Real-world progression-free survival among patients with homologous recombination-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the CHAR1ZMA study

Real-world progression-free survival among patients with homologous recombination-deficient epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the CHAR1ZMA study

Examining health-related quality of life outcomes among older patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in context with efficacy and safety findings: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

Examining health-related quality of life outcomes among older patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in context with efficacy and safety findings: Results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

Characteristics and real-world outcomes of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy in the COMB1NE study

Characteristics and real-world outcomes of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer who received niraparib + bevacizumab first-line maintenance therapy in the COMB1NE study

The potential impact of excluding patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer and no postoperative visible residual disease from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial: The AR1ZE real-world study of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy

The potential impact of excluding patients with stage III epithelial ovarian cancer and no postoperative visible residual disease from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial: The AR1ZE real-world study of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy

Real-World First-Line Maintenance Niraparib Monotherapy Use Following Chemotherapy Plus Bevacizumab: The SW1TCH Study.

Clinical trials have demonstrated prolonged survival associated with niraparib first-line maintenance (1LM) therapy, compared with placebo, for patients with ovarian cancer (OC). However, data are limited on real-world 1LM niraparib monotherapy use, particularly as switch 1LM, following first-line (1L) combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. This real-world study aimed to describe patient demographics, clinical characteristics, and clinical outcomes of patients with OC receiving 1LM niraparib monotherapy following 1L combination chemotherapy plus bevacizumab. This retrospective observational study used data from a US-based nationwide database of deidentified, electronic health record-derived data. Patients diagnosed with OC during the study period (1 January 2011-30 November 2022, inclusive) were eligible if they received 1L chemotherapy plus bevacizumab treatment followed by 1LM niraparib monotherapy, initiated between 1 January 2017 (inclusive) and 2 September 2022. Patients were followed from index date (initiation of niraparib 1LM) until the first occurrence of death, end of follow-up, or end of study. Clinical outcomes were time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) and time to next treatment (TTNT). Kaplan-Meier curves were used to estimate TTD, TTNT, and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Among 93 patients selected, median age at index was 67years (interquartile range [IQR] 60-72 years). Most patients had BRCA wild-type/homologous recombination (HR)-proficient or BRCA wild-type/HR unknown disease (75.3%). In all, 18 (19.4%) patients had HR-deficient disease. Five (5.4%) patients had unknown test results for both BRCA and HR deficiency status. Median follow-up time was 16.3months (IQR 8.7-25.4months), and median time from end of 1L therapy to 1LM initiation was 35.0days (IQR 25.0-53.9days). Median TTD was 9.3months (95% CI 6.1-11.3months). Median TTNT was 12.9months (95% CI 11.5-19.0months). This real-world study provided insights into switch maintenance with 1LM niraparib monotherapy, which may be a viable treatment option for patients with advanced OC.

Niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer: final overall survival results from the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial

The phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial met its primary endpoint. Niraparib first-line maintenance significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) among patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer (aOC) that responded to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, regardless of homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status. Final overall survival (OS) results are reported. Patients were randomized 2:1 to niraparib or placebo, stratified by response to first-line treatment, receipt of neoadjuvant chemotherapy, and tumor HRD status. After reaching 60% target maturity, OS was evaluated via a stratified log-rank test using randomization stratification factors and summarized using Kaplan-Meier methodology. OS testing was hierarchical (overall population first, then the homologous recombination-deficient [HRd] population). Other secondary outcomes and long-term safety were assessed; an updated, ad hoc analysis of investigator-assessed PFS was also conducted (cutoff date, 08Apr2024). Median follow-up was 73.9 months. In the overall population, the OS hazard ratio (HR) was 1.01 (95% CI, 0.84-1.23; P= 0.8834) for niraparib (n= 487) versus placebo (n;= 246). In the HRd (n= 373) and homologous recombination-proficient (n= 249) populations, the OS HRs were 0.95 (95% CI, 0.71-1.29) and 0.93 (95% CI 0.69-1.26), respectively. Subsequent poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitor therapy was received by 11.7% and 15.8% of niraparib patients and 37.8% and 48.4% of placebo patients in the overall and HRd populations, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate numerically favored niraparib in the overall (niraparib, 22%; placebo, 12%) and HRd populations (niraparib, 35%; placebo, 16%). Myelodysplastic syndromes/acute myeloid leukemia incidence was <2.5% (niraparib, 2.3%; placebo, 1.6%). No new safety signals were observed. In patients with newly diagnosed aOC at high risk of recurrence, there was no difference in OS between treatment arms. In the HRd population, patients alive at 5 years were twice as likely to be progression free with niraparib treatment than placebo. Long-term safety remained consistent with the established niraparib safety profile.

A randomized phase II study of secondary cytoreductive surgery in patients with relapsed ovarian cancer who have progressed on a PARP inhibitor as first-line maintenance therapy: the SOCCER-P study (KGOG 3067/JGOG 3036/APGOT-OV11)

BackgroundAlthough two recent phase III randomized controlled trials showed survival benefits of undergoing secondary cytoreductive surgery for an initial relapse of ovarian cancer, patients who received a poly-ADP ribose polymerase...

EHMT1/2 inhibition promotes regression of therapy-resistant ovarian cancer tumors in a CD8 T cell-dependent manner.

Poly ADP-ribose polymerase inhibitors (PARPi) are first-line maintenance therapy for ovarian cancer and an alternative therapy for several other cancer types. However, PARPi-resistance is rising and there is currently an unmet need to combat PARPi-resistant tumors. Here, we created an immunocompetent, PARPi-resistant mouse model to test the efficacy of combinatory PARPi and euchromatic histone methyltransferase 1/2 inhibitor (EHMTi) in the treatment of PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer. We discovered that inhibition of EHMT1/2 resensitizes cells to PARPi. Markedly, we show that single EHMTi and combinatory EHMTi/PARPi significantly reduced PARPi-resistant tumor burden and that this reduction is partially dependent on CD8 T cells. Altogether, our results show a low-toxicity drug that effectively treats PARPi-resistant ovarian cancer in an immune-dependent manner, supporting its entry into clinical development and potential incorporation of immunotherapy. Implications: Targeting the epigenome of therapy-resistant ovarian cancer induces an anti-tumor response mediated in part through an anti-tumor immune response.

Patient Characteristics Associated with Time to Next Treatment in Patients with Ovarian Cancer Treated with Niraparib: The PRED1CT Real-World Study.

Niraparib first-line maintenance (1LM) therapy has demonstrated clinical benefit for patients with ovarian cancer (OC) in clinical trial and real-world settings, but data on factors associated with real-world patient outcomes remain limited. This analysis identified patient characteristics associated with time to next treatment (TTNT), a proxy for real-world progression-free survival, in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy. This retrospective observational study used a USA nationwide electronic health record-derived deidentified database and included adult patients diagnosed with OC who initiated 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Patients were followed until the earliest occurrence of last clinical activity, death, or end of study period. TTNT was measured from 1LM niraparib initiation to the start of second-line treatment or death. Cox proportional hazards models assessed univariable and multivariable associations between baseline characteristics and TTNT. Of 7872 patients diagnosed with OC, 526 met the eligibility criteria and were included in this analysis. Median (IQR) duration of follow-up was 14.1 (7.4-23.6) months. In univariable analyses, age, BRCA/homologous recombination deficiency (HRD) status, socioeconomic status, stage at initial diagnosis, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT and were introduced into the multivariable model with other clinically relevant variables. In the multivariable analysis, BRCA/HRD status, cytoreductive surgery type, and residual disease status were significantly associated with observed TTNT after covariate adjustment. Conversely, age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, disease stage, niraparib starting dose status, and first-line bevacizumab use were not associated with observed TTNT. This real-world, retrospective, observational analysis offers valuable insights on prognostic factors associated with TTNT in patients with OC treated with 1LM niraparib monotherapy after first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. Future studies are needed to examine how additional patient characteristics associated with clinical outcomes may guide treatment decisions and improve outcomes.

Predictors of long-term progression-free survival in patients with ovarian cancer treated with niraparib in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study

ObjectiveTo identify characteristics associated with long-term progression-free survival (≥2 years) in patients with advanced ovarian cancer treated with niraparib first-line maintenance therapy in the phase III PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 study.MethodsIn this post...

Prescribers and patients drive maintenance therapy patterns in a community oncology practice: National guidelines versus the real-world experience

ObjectivePrevious studies have shown that first-line (1L) maintenance therapy (MT) with poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors and/or bevacizumab improves outcomes among patients with advanced ovarian cancer (OC); however, these treatments are underutilized. This study aimed to provide a real-world understanding of MTs among patients with advanced OC who received 1L platinum-based chemotherapy (PBC). MethodsA retrospective chart review using iKnowMed electronic health records to identify patients aged ≥18 years with advanced OC who initiated 1L PBC between January 1, 2018–December 31, 2020. Following 1L PBC, patients could have received MT or active surveillance (AS). Kaplan–Meier methods were used to estimate time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), and overall survival (OS). ResultsOf the 600 chart-reviewed patients included, 239 (39.8 %) received MT and 315 (52.5 %) received AS. Patients who were <65 years of age, or those with higher-stage disease or those who had received neoadjuvant treatment, were more likely to initiate MT than AS. Genetic testing rates were low across both cohorts. Median (95 % confidence interval [CI]) TTD for the MT cohort was 13.6 months (11.0, 21.2). Median (95 % CI) rwPFS was 26.9 months (21.3, not reached) and 11.3 months (9.5, 13.0) for the 1L MT and AS cohorts, respectively (p < 0.0001). OS at 36 months was 82.4 % in the 1L MT cohort and 58.0 % in the 1L AS cohort. ConclusionsThis study reinforces clinical trial findings that 1L MT improves outcomes in patients with advanced OC; however, genetic testing rates and 1L MT remained low.

Tailored Treatment Strategies in First Line Therapy for Ovarian Cancer Patients: A Critical Review of the Literature.

Ovarian cancer (OC) is a significant cause of cancer-related mortality in women globally, with a five-year survival rate of approximately 49%. Standard therapy involves cytoreductive surgery followed by chemotherapy. Its poor prognosis has driven interest in alternative therapies such as targeted molecular agents like bevacizumab and poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors (PARPi). This review systematically searched PubMed from January 2018 to December 2023 for studies on PARPi in OC. Emphasis was on identifying relevant Phase III trials, extracting data on study design, patient demographics, and outcomes. Special focus was on assessing PARPi efficacy, safety, impact on quality of life, and ongoing trials, including those on Clinicaltrials.gov. The efficacy of PARPi in first-line therapy for OC has been extensively studied. Trials like SOLO-1, PRIMA, and ATHENA-MONO have demonstrated significant improvements in progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), particularly in patients with BRCA mutations. Additionally, the combination of PARPi with other agents like bevacizumab has shown promising results in extending PFS. However, PARPi treatment is associated with various adverse effects, including hematologic toxicities like anemia, thrombocytopenia, and neutropenia. While most adverse events are manageable, some patients may require dose adjustments or discontinuation of treatment. Importantly, PARPi maintenance therapy has not adversely affected health-related quality of life (HRQoL), with studies reporting similar HRQoL scores between PARPi-treated and placebo-treated patients. PARPi offer effective treatment with manageable side effects, suitable even for medically fragile patients. Individualized dosing can optimize benefits while minimizing adverse events. Exploring diverse treatment approaches, particularly in patients with limited life expectancy or high disease burden, could improve outcomes. Ongoing research is investigating alternative therapies and combinations to broaden treatment options. Combining bevacizumab with PARPi may be justified for first-line and recurrent maintenance therapy. Regardless of mutational status, PARPi should be considered for maintenance therapy in newly diagnosed advanced OC. Platinum sensitivity remains crucial for treatment decisions and predicting survival outcomes.

Tolerability of the niraparib individualized starting dose in the PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial of niraparib first-line maintenance therapy

PurposeTo explore safety and tolerability parameters for the niraparib individualized starting dose (ISD) in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer that responded to platinum-based chemotherapy who participated in the phase 3 PRIMA/ENGOT-OV26/GOG-3012 trial (NCT02655016). MethodsThe PRIMA protocol was amended so newly enrolled patients received an ISD based on baseline body weight/platelet count. In this ad hoc analysis, the timing, duration, and resolution of the first occurrence of common any-grade hematologic (thrombocytopenia, anemia, neutropenia) and nonhematologic (nausea, asthenia/fatigue, constipation, insomnia, hypertension) treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were evaluated by treatment arm in the ISD safety population (data cutoff, November 17, 2021; median follow-up, 3.5 years). ResultsOf 733 randomized patients, 255 were enrolled after the ISD protocol amendment and received ≥ 1 dose of study treatment (niraparib, 169; placebo, 86). In the niraparib arm, median times to first events were 22.0–35.0 days for hematologic TEAEs and 7.0–56.0 days for nonhematologic TEAEs. First events resolved in ≥ 89.8% of patients for hematologic TEAEs; for nonhematologic TEAEs, resolution rates ranged from 55.3% (insomnia) to 86.0% (nausea). Median durations of first hematologic TEAEs were ≤ 16.0 days, but for first nonhematologic TEAEs ranged from 18.0 days (nausea) to 134.0 days (insomnia). ConclusionThe niraparib ISD was generally well tolerated and TEAEs were manageable. Common hematologic and nonhematologic TEAEs occurred early and first events of hematologic TEAEs had a short duration (≈ 2 weeks) and a high resolution rate. These findings support close monitoring immediately following niraparib initiation and may help inform patient expectations for niraparib safety.

Study on the efficacy and toxicity of pamiparib combined with tamoxifen in the treatment of patients with epithelial ovarian cancer with biochemical recurrence during first-line PARPi maintenance therapy.

TPS5621 Background: A high proportion of ovarian cancer patients tend to have elevated CA-125 1-6 months before imaging recurrence. The time between biochemical recurrence (i.e., only elevated CA-125 without imaging finding or clinical symptoms) to imaging recurrence can be considered a "window period", and if the “window period” can be extended, it may convert platinum-resistant relapsed patients to platinum-sensitive patients, and ultimately improving patient outcomes. The timing of treatment for the biochemical recurrent patients has been controversial. Tamoxifen, an anti-estrogenic drug, is considered an effective option for these patients. Pamiparib (BGB-290) is an investigational small molecule inhibitor of PARP1 and PARP2. According to OReO study(NCT03106987), the "PARPi after PARPi" strategy is effective in recurrent ovarian cancer patients previously treated with a PARP inhibitor. Therefore, we aim to further explore the use of PARP inhibitors in maintenance therapy for patients with ovarian cancer. Methods: This study (NCT05669768) will evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of pamiparib and tamoxifen in ovarian cancer patients with biochemical recurrence during first-line PARPi maintenance therapy. The included ovarian cancer patients are required to achieve No Evidence of Disease (NED) or demonstrated a response following platinum-based chemotherapy, with normalized CA-125 levels. First-line maintenance treatment with a PARP inhibitor is mandatory, with a minimum interval of ≥6 months to biochemical recurrence. The trial design is interventional, employing a Simon two-stage design to estimate sample size. The primary outcome of the study is the CA-125 response rate, which was assessed according to the GCIG criteria.1 The secondary outcome was Time to First Subsequent Therapy (TFST). Patients undergo regular assessments for tumor markers and imaging throughout treatment. If persistent elevation of tumor markers or the detection of recurrent lesions or distant metastases is observed, the patient is promptly removed from the study group. Standardized antitumor therapy is then initiated based on the patient's condition. The total planned enrollment is 46 participants, utilizing a single-group assignment and an open-label design. 1 of planned 12 patients for the first stage of accrual have been enrolled. Reference: 1. Rustin GJ, Vergote I, Eisenhauer E, et al. Definitions for response and progression in ovarian cancer clinical trials incorporating RECIST 1.1 and CA 125 agreed by the Gynecological Cancer Intergroup (GCIG). Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2011;21(2):419-423. Clinical trial information: NCT05669768 .

Fecal microbiota transplantation combined with anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitors as first-line maintenance therapy for advanced gastric and non small cell lung cancer.

2646 Background: Immunotherapy(IT) combined with chemotherapy has gradually emerged as the first-line(1L) standard treatment for most advanced tumors; however, numerous studies have demonstrated that chemo-immunotherapy can lead to a reduction in intestinal microbiota diversity, subsequently resulting in compromised immunity. So we assumed whether supplement gut microbiota through fecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) and subsequent anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitor therapy as maintenance therapy could potentially prolong progression-free survival (PFS) in patients(pts) with advanced gastric and non small cell lung cancers (ChiCTR2100054928). Methods: This is a prospective, single-arm exploratory study. The key inclusion criteria encompassed pts with unresectable advanced gastric/gastroesophageal union carcinoma (GC) and advanced non small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), who demonstrated partial response(PR) or stable disease (SD) after 1L therapy with ECOG scores ranged from 0 to 1.There were 2 FMT healthy donors, FMT was performed via nasoenteric tubes or oral capsules after 1L therapy, followed by maintenance therapy with anti-PD-(L)1 inhibitors until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression(PD). Results: From Jan. 2022 to Dec. 2023, a total of 17 pts were enrolled, including 9 GC and 8 NSCLC. 82% were male, and the median age was 68 years (range, 49-80). All pts achieved either a partial response (PR, n=7) or stable disease (SD, n=10) after 1L therapy and subsequently underwent FMT prior to commencing maintenance therapy. The intestinal microbiomes used for FMT with nasoenteric tubes were from the same donor (GC [n=3], NSCLC [n=5]), while those in the capsules were from a different donor (GC [n=6], NSCLC [n=3]). We defined the time from receiving 1L therapy to FMT as PFS0; and from the FMT to PD as PFS1. The sum of PFS0 and PFS1 represents the time from the start of 1L therapy to PD as PFS. Of the 17 recipients, 12 showed SD (GC [n=6], NSCLC [n=6]) and 5 showed PD (GC [n=3], NSCLC [n=2]). In the GC group, median follow-up was 8.8 months (interquartile range [IQR] 5.1-9.7), with unreached median PFS1 and a one-year PFS rate of 78%. For NSCLC, median follow-up was 8.0 months (IQR 4.2-12.2), with unreached median PFS1 and a one-year PFS rate of 67%. No statistically significant differences were observed in pts who underwent FMT using two distinct methods. 53% of pts reported improved quality of life (QoL). 5 pts (29%) experienced grade 1-2 FMT-related toxicities, primarily gastrointestinal reactions, including diarrhea, gas, and abdominal pain, but no grade 3 or higher adverse events were identified. Conclusions: Administering FMT prior to 1L immune maintenance therapy in pts with advanced GC and NSCLC has the potential to prolong PFS, and demonstrate a favorable safety. However, these findings necessitate validation through larger-scale clinical trials. Clinical trial information: ChiCTR2100054928.

Senaparib as first-line maintenance therapy in advanced ovarian cancer: a randomized phase 3 trial.

Poly(adenosine diphosphate-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors as maintenance therapy after first-line chemotherapy have improved progression-free survival in women with advanced ovarian cancer; however, not all PARP inhibitors can provide benefit for a biomarker-unselected population. Senaparib is a PARP inhibitor that demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with solid tumors, including ovarian cancer, in phase 1 studies. The multicenter, double-blind, phase 3 trial FLAMES randomized (2:1) 404 females with advanced ovarian cancer (International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics stage III-IV) and response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy to senaparib 100 mg (n = 271) or placebo (n = 133) orally once daily for up to 2 years. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival assessed by blinded independent central review. At the prespecified interim analysis, the median progression-free survival was not reached with senaparib and was 13.6 months with placebo (hazard ratio 0.43, 95% confidence interval 0.32-0.58; P < 0.0001). The benefit with senaparib over placebo was consistent in the subgroups defined by BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation or homologous recombination status. Grade ≥3 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 179 (66%) and 27 (20%) patients, respectively. Senaparib significantly improved progression-free survival versus placebo in patients with advanced ovarian cancer after response to first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, irrespective of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status and with consistent benefits observed between homologous recombination subgroups, and was well tolerated. These results support senaparib as a maintenance treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer after a response to first-line chemotherapy. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04169997 .

Cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy for adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in France.

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of avelumab first-line (1L) maintenance therapy plus best supportive care (BSC) versus BSC alone for adults with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (la/mUC) that had not progressed following platinum-based chemotherapy in France. A three-state partitioned survival model was developed to assess the lifetime costs and effects of avelumab plus BSC versus BSC alone. Data from the phase 3 JAVELIN Bladder 100 trial (NCT02603432) were used to inform estimates of clinical and utility values considering a 10-year time horizon and a weekly cycle length. Cost data were estimated from a collective perspective and included treatment acquisition, administration, follow-up, adverse event-related hospitalization, transport, post-progression, and end-of-life costs. Health outcomes were measured in quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and life-years gained. Costs and clinical outcomes were discounted at 2.5% per annum. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were used to compare cost-effectiveness and willingness to pay in France. Uncertainty was assessed using a range of sensitivity analyses. Avelumab plus BSC was associated with a gain of 2.49 QALYs and total discounted costs of €136,917; BSC alone was associated with 1.82 QALYs and €39,751. Although avelumab plus BSC was associated with increased acquisition costs compared with BSC alone, offsets of -€20,424 and -€351 were observed for post-progression and end-of-life costs, respectively. The base case analysis ICER was €145,626/QALY. Sensitivity analyses were consistent with the reference case and showed that efficacy parameters (overall survival, time to treatment discontinuation), post-progression time on immunotherapy, and post-progression costs had the largest impact on the ICER. This analysis demonstrated that avelumab plus BSC is associated with a favorable cost-effectiveness profile for patients with la/mUC who are eligible for 1L maintenance therapy in France.

J-AVENUE: A retrospective, real-world study evaluating patient characteristics and outcomes in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan.

The JAVELIN Bladder 100 phase 3 trial showed that avelumab first-line maintenance + best supportive care significantly prolonged overall survival and progression-free survival versus best supportive care alone in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma who were progression-free following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy. We report findings from J-AVENUE (NCT05431777), a real-world study of avelumab first-line maintenance therapy in Japan. Medical charts of patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression following first-line platinum-based chemotherapy, who received avelumab maintenance between February and November 2021, were reviewed. Patients were followed until June 2022. The primary endpoint was patient characteristics; secondary endpoints included time to treatment failure and progression-free survival. In 79 patients analyzed, median age was 72 years (range, 44-86). Primary tumor site was upper tract in 45.6% and bladder in 54.4%. The most common first-line chemotherapy regimen was cisplatin + gemcitabine (63.3%). Median number of chemotherapy cycles received was four. Best response to chemotherapy was complete response in 10.1%, partial response in 58.2%, and stable disease in 31.6%. Median treatment-free interval before avelumab was 4.9 weeks. With avelumab first-line maintenance therapy, the disease control rate was 58.2%, median time to treatment failure was 4.6 months (95% CI, 3.3-6.4), and median progression-free survival was 6.1 months (95% CI, 3.6-9.7). Findings from J-AVENUE show the effectiveness of avelumab first-line maintenance in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma in Japan in clinical practice, with similar progression-free survival to JAVELIN Bladder 100 and previous real-world studies, supporting its use as a standard of care.