First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Research Articles

Tumor microenvironment and clinical efficacy of first line immunotherapy-based combinations in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The impact of tumor microenvironment (TME) in influencing clinical response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment in advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is unclear. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) could identify biomarkers related to immune checkpoints and immune cell population. This study retrospectively characterized TME from 28 RCC patients who received first line ICI-based therapy through IHC assessment of selected markers and explored preliminary evidence about their possible correlation with treatment efficacy. We found a significantly higher count of CD80+, CD163+ cells and their ratio in RCC with clear cell component compared to those without clear cell features; additionally, patients with metastatic disease at diagnosis were associated with higher expression of CD163+ cells, while higher count of CD4+ cells and CD4+/CD8+ ratio were found in RCC with sarcomatoid features. Patients achieving partial or complete response were associated with lower expression of CD163+ cells (median 28 vs 47; p = 0.049). Furthermore, lower expression of CD163+ was associated with better PFS (median PFS 20.0 vs 4.7 months; HR 0.22 p = 0.011) and OS (median OS NR vs 14.4 months; HR 0.28 p = 0.036). A longer OS was reported in PD-L1 CPS negative patients (median OS NR vs 11.8 months; HR 0.20 p = 0.024). High infiltration of CD163+ macrophages, who typically present “anti-inflammatory” M2-like phenotype, could identify a subgroup of patients with poor survival after receiving first-line ICI.

Does patient sex affect the treatment outcome of immune checkpoint inhibitors? A Danish, observational melanoma study

AimThe objective of this study was to evaluate whether patient biological sex influences treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) undergoing first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy. MethodsThe Danish Metastatic Melanoma Database (DAMMED) was employed to identify patients who underwent first-line ICI therapy for MM in Denmark from 2013 to 2021. Excluding adjuvant treatment, uveal and mucosal histological subtypes, the study conducted univariable and multivariable analyses to evaluate the influence of patient sex in survival analyses. Further, landmark survival of this real-world national cohort was described for progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS). ResultsThe analysis encompassed a cohort of 1378 patients with MM. Compared to male sex, females had significantly improved OS (p = 0.003) when tested in univariable testing. Multivariable analyses, controlling for age, performance status, lactate dehydrogenase level, BRAF status, M-stage, and number of metastatic sites revealed significant favourable outcomes associated with female sex irrespective of the considered survival metrics (pPFS = 0.014, pOS = 0.002, and pMSS = 0.03). The observed five-year OS rates of the entire cohort were 47% and 38%, while melanoma-specific survival were 50% and 45% for female and male, respectively. ConclusionIn this nationwide cohort of patients with MM undergoing first-line ICI treatment females exhibited superior treatment outcomes compared to males. Sex was identified as an independent predictive variable for treatment outcomes, irrespective of the chosen outcome measures considered. Our analyses are not able to conclude whether the differences in outcome is attributable to differences in biology or to treatment strategy.

Real-World Impact of Upfront Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic Non-Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-Line Immunotherapy Combinations or Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (A Sub-Analysis from the ARON-1 Retrospective Study).

About 20% of patients with renal cell carcinoma present with non-clear cell histology (nccRCC), encompassing various histological types. While surgery remains pivotal for localized-stage nccRCC, the role of cytoreductive nephrectomy (CN) in metastatic nccRCC is contentious. Limited data exist on the role of CN in metastatic nccRCC under current standard of care. This retrospective study focused on the impact of upfront CN on metastatic nccRCC outcomes with first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (IO) combinations or tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy. The study included 221 patients with nccRCC and synchronous metastatic disease, treated with IO combinations or TKI monotherapy in the first line. Baseline clinical characteristics, systemic therapy, and treatment outcomes were analyzed. The primary objective was to assess clinical outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS)and overall survival(OS). Statistical analysis involved the Fisher exact test, Pearson's correlation coefficient, analysis of variance, Kaplan-Meier method, log-rank test, and univariate/multivariate Cox proportional hazard regression models. Median OS for patients undergoing upfront CN was 36.8 (95% confidence interval [CI] 24.9-71.3) versus 20.8 (95% CI 12.6-24.8) months for those without CN (p = 0.005). Upfront CN was significantly associated with OS in the multivariate Cox regression analysis (hazard ratio 0.47 [95% CI 0.31-0.72], p < 0.001). In patients without CN, the median OS and PFS was 24.5 (95% CI 18.1-40.5) and 13.0 months (95% CI 6.6-23.5) for patients treated with IO+TKI versus 7.5 (95% CI 4.3-22.4) and 4.9 months (95% CI 3.0-8.1) for those receiving the IO+IO combination (p = 0.059 and p = 0.032, respectively). Our study demonstrates the survival benefits of upfront CN compared with systemic therapy without CN. The study suggests that the use of IO+TKI combination or, eventually, TKI monotherapy might be a better choice than IO+IO combination for patients who are not candidates for CN regardless of IO eligibility. Prospective trials are needed to validate these findings and refine the role of CN in current mRCC management.

A Clinical Analysis of Anti-Programmed Death-Ligand 1 (PD-L1) Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Treatments Combined with Chemotherapy in Untreated Extensive-Stage Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

Real-world clinical experience of using anti-programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment of extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients has rarely been reported. In this study, we aimed to perform a retrospective multicenter clinical analysis of extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line therapy with anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy. Between November 2018 and March 2022, 72 extensive-stage SCLC patients receiving first-line atezolizumab or durvalumab in combination with chemotherapy, according to the cancer center databases of Linkou, Chiayi, and Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospitals, were retrospectively included in the analysis. Twenty-one patients (29.2%) received atezolizumab and fifty-one (70.8%) received durvalumab. Objective response (OR) and disease control (DC) rates of 59.7% and 73.6%, respectively, were observed with first-line ICI plus chemotherapy. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.63 months (95% confidence interval (CI), 5.25-8.02), and the median overall survival (OS) was 16.07 months (95% CI, 15.12-17.0) in all study patients. A high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR; >4) and a high serum lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) concentration (>260 UL) were identified as independent unfavorable factors associated with shorter OS in the multivariate analysis. Regarding safety, neutropenia was the most common grade 3 treatment-related adverse event (AE), but no treatment-related deaths occurred in the study patients. First-line anti-PD-L1 ICIs combined with chemotherapy are effective and safe for male extensive-stage SCLC patients. Further therapeutic strategies may need to be developed for patients with unfavorable outcomes (e.g., baseline high NLR and serum LDH level).

Comparing survival in trial- versus routine-care advanced urothelial cancer patients on immune checkpoint blockade.

Although recent trials involving first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors have expanded treatment options for patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma (aUC) who are ineligible for standard cisplatin-based chemotherapy, there exists limited evidence for whether trial efficacy translates into real-world effectiveness for patients seen in routine care. This retrospective cohort study compares differences in overall survival (OS) between KEYNOTE-052 trial participants and routine-care patients receiving first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. A routine-care patient cohort was constructed from the Flatiron Health database using trial eligibility criteria and was weighted to balance EHR and trial patient characteristics using matching-adjusted indirect comparisons. The routine-care cohort was older, more likely to be female, and more often cisplatin-ineligible due to renal dysfunction. ECOG performance status was comparable between the cohorts. Median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7-16) in the weighted routine-care cohort and 11.3 months (9.7-13.1) in the trial cohort. No significant differences between the Kaplan-Meier OS curves were detected (p = 0.76). Survival probabilities were similar between the weighted routine-care and trial cohorts at 12-, 24-, and 36- months (0.45 vs. 0.47, 0.31 vs. 0.31, 0.26 vs. 0.23, respectively). Notably, routine care patients had modestly lower survival at 3 months compared to trial participants (0.69 vs. 0.83, respectively). Our results provide reassurance that cisplatin-ineligible aUC patients receiving first-line immunotherapy in routine care experience similar benefits to those observed in trial patients.

The proportion of tumour stroma predicts response to treatment of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIB-IV non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunotherapy has brought a new era to cancer treatment, yet we lack dependable predictors for its effectiveness. This study explores the predictive significance of intratumour stroma proportion (iTSP) for treatment success and prognosis in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients undergoing treatment with immune check-point inhibitors (ICIs) together with chemotherapy. We retrospectively collected data from patients with unresectable stage IIIB-IV NSCLC who were treated with first-line ICIs and chemotherapy. Each patient received a confirmed pathological diagnosis, and the pathologist evaluated the iTSP on haematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained sections of diagnostic tissue slides. Among the 102 H&E-stained biopsy samples, 61 (59.8%) were categorised as stroma-L (less than 50% iTSP), while 41 (40.2%) were classified as stroma-H (more than 50% iTSP). We observed that the stroma-L group exhibited a significantly better objective response rate (ORR) (72.1 versus 51.2%, P = 0.031) and deeper response depth (DpR) (-50.49 ± 28.79% versus -35.83 ± 29.91%, P = 0.015) compared to the stroma-H group. Furthermore, the stroma-L group showed longer median progression-free survival (PFS) (9.6 versus 6.0 months, P = 0.011) and overall survival (OS) (24.0 versus 12.2 months, P = 0.001) compared to the stroma-H group. Multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis indicated that iTSP was a highly significant prognostic factor for both PFS [hazard ratio (HR) = 1.713; P = 0.030] and OS (HR = 2.225; P = 0.003). Our findings indicate that a lower iTSP corresponds to improved clinical outcomes and greater DpR in individuals with stage IIIB-IV NSCLC treated with first-line ICIs and chemotherapy. The iTSP could potentially serve as a predictive biomarker for ICIs therapy response.

First-line immunotherapy of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: an updated network meta-analysis including triplet therapy.

To compare the differential efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combined therapies among patients with intermediate- and poor-risk metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC), as recently, the efficacy of triplet therapy comprising nivolumab plus ipilimumab plus cabozantinib has been published. Three databases were searched in December 2022 for randomised controlled trials (RCTs) analysing oncological outcomes in patients with mRCC treated with first-line ICI-based combined therapies. We performed network meta-analysis (NMA) to compare the outcomes, including progression-free survival (PFS) and objective response rates (ORRs), in patients with intermediate- and poor-risk mRCC; we also assessed treatment-related adverse events. Overall, seven RCTs were included in the meta-analyses and NMAs. Treatment ranking analysis revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib (99%) had the highest likelihood of improved PFS, followed by nivolumab + cabozantinib (79%), and nivolumab + ipilimumab + cabozantinib (77%). Notably, compared to nivolumab + cabozantinib, adding ipilimumab to nivolumab + cabozantinib did not improve PFS (hazard ratio 1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.72-1.43). Regarding ORRs, treatment ranking analysis also revealed that pembrolizumab + lenvatinib had the highest likelihood of providing better ORRs (99.7%). The likelihoods of improved PFS and ORRs of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib were true in both International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Our analyses confirmed the robust efficacy of pembrolizumab + lenvatinib as first-line treatment for patients with intermediate or poor IMDC risk mRCC. Triplet therapy did not result in superior efficacy. Considering both toxicity and the lack of mature overall survival data, triplet therapy should only be considered in selected patients.

Memory/active T cell activation is associated with immunotherapeutic response in fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma.

Fumarate hydratase-deficient renal cell carcinoma (FH-deficient RCC) is a rare and lethal subtype of kidney cancer. However, the optimal treatments and molecular correlates of benefits for FH-deficient RCC are currently lacking. A total of 91 patients with FH-deficient RCC from 15 medical centers between 2009 and 2022 were enrolled in this study. Genomic and bulk RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) were performed on 88 and 45 untreated FH-deficient RCCs, respectively. Single-cell RNA-seq was performed to identify biomarkers for treatment response. Main outcomes included disease-free survival (DFS) for localized patients, objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) for metastatic patients. In the localized setting, we found that a cell cycle progression signature enabled to predict disease progression. In the metastatic setting, first-line immune checkpoint inhibitor plus tyrosine kinase inhibitor (ICI+TKI) combination therapy showed satisfactory safety and was associated with a higher ORR (43.2% vs. 5.6%), apparently superior PFS (median PFS: 17.3 vs. 9.6 months, P=0.016) and OS (median OS: not reached vs. 25.7 months, P=0.005) over TKI monotherapy. Bulk and single-cell RNA-seq data revealed an enrichment of memory and effect T cells in responders to ICI plus TKI combination therapy. Furthermore, we identified a signature of memory and effect T cells that was associated with the effectiveness of ICI plus TKI combination therapy. ICI plus TKI combination therapy may represent a promising treatment option for metastatic FH-deficient RCC. A memory/active T cell-derived signature is associated with the efficacy of ICI+TKI but necessitates further validation.

Effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors at different treatment time periods on prognosis of patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer.

The application of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating patients with extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC) has brought us new hope, but the real-world outcome is relatively lacking. Our aim was to investigate the clinical use, efficacy, and survival benefit of ICIs in ES-SCLC from real-world data analysis. A retrospective analysis of ES-SCLC patients was conducted between 2012 and 2022. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed between groups to evaluate the value of ICIs at different lines of treatment. PFS1 was defined as the duration from initial therapy to disease progression or death. PFS2 was defined as the duration from the first disease progression to the second disease progression or death. One hundred and eighty patients with ES-SCLC were included. We performed landmark analysis, which showed that compared to the second-line and subsequent-lines ICIs-combined therapy group (2SL-ICIs) and non-ICIs group, the first-line ICIs-combined therapy group (1L-ICIs) prolonged OS and PFS1. There was a trend toward prolonged OS in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group, but the significance threshold was not met (median OS 11.94months vs. 11.10months, P = 0.14). A longer PFS2 was present in the 2SL-ICIs group than in the non-ICIs group (median PFS2 4.13months vs. 2.60months, P < 0.001). First-line ICIs plus chemotherapy should be applied in clinical practice. If patients did not use ICIs plus chemotherapy in first-line therapy, the use of ICIs in the second line or subsequent lines of treatment could prolong PFS2.

Impact of Synchronous versus Metachronous Metastasis on Outcomes in Patients with Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Treated with First-line Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor–based Combinations

Background and objectiveThe impact of time of metastasis onset with respect toprimary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) diagnosis on survival outcomes is not well characterized in the era of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based combinations. Herein, we assessed differences in clinical outcomes between synchronous and metachronous metastatic RCC (mRCC). MethodsData for patients with mRCC treated with first-line ICI-based combination therapies between 2014 and 2023 were retrospectively collected. Patients were categorized as having synchronous metastasis if present within 3 mo of RCC diagnosis; metachronous metastasis was defined as metastasis >3 mo after primary diagnosis. Time to treatment failure (TTF), overall survival (OS), and the disease control rate (DCR) were assessed. Key findings and limitationsOur analysis included 223 eligible patients (126 synchronous and 97 metachronous). Median TTF did not significantly differ between the synchronous and metachronous groups (9 vs 19.8 mo; p = 0.063). Median OS was significantly shorter in the synchronous group (28.0 vs 50.9 mo; p = 0.001). Similarly, patients with synchronous metachronous metastasis (58.7% vs. 78.4%; p = 0.002). On multivariable analyses, synchronous metastasis remained independently associated with worse OS and DCR. Conclusions and clinical implicationsIn this hypothesis-generating study, patients with mRCC with synchronous metastasis who were treated with first-line ICI-based combinations have a poorer OS and worse DCR than those with metachronous mRCC. If these results are externally validated, time to metastasis could be included in prognostic models for mRCC. Patient summaryOur study demonstrates that patients treated with current first-line immunotherapies, who present with metastasis at the initial diagnosis of kidney cancer have worse overall survival compared to those who develop metastasis later. These results can help physicians and patients understand life expectancy.

Multicentre phase II trial of cabozantinib in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma after immune checkpoint inhibitor treatment

Prospective data on treatment after immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. We conducted a phase II multicentre study on cabozantinib after ICI treatment in HCC. This is an investigator-initiated, single-arm, clinical trial involving academic centres in Hong Kong and Korea. Key eligibility criteria included diagnosis of HCC, refractoriness to prior ICI-based treatment, and Child-Pugh A liver function. A maximum of two prior lines of therapy were allowed. All patients were commenced on cabozantinib at 60mg/day. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Forty-seven patients were recruited from Oct 2020 to May 2022; 27 and 20 patients had received one and two prior therapies, respectively. Median follow-up was 11.2 months. The median PFS was 4.1 months (95% CI 3.3-5.3). The median overall survival (OS) was 9.9 months (95% CI 7.3-14.4), and the 1-year OS rate was 45.3%. Partial response and stable disease occurred in 3 (6.4%) and 36 (76.6%) patients, respectively. When used as a second-line treatment (n= 27), cabozantinib was associated with a median PFS and OS of 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-6.7) and 14.3 (95% CI 8.9-NR) months, respectively. The corresponding median PFS and OS were 4.3 (95% CI 3.3-11.0) and 14.3 (95% CI 9.0-NR) months, respectively, for those receiving ICI-based regimens with proven benefits (n= 17). The most common grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse event was thrombocytopenia (6.4%). The median dose of cabozantinib was 40mg/day. The number of prior therapies was an independent prognosticator (one vs. two; hazard ratio= 0.37; p= 0.03). Cabozantinib demonstrated efficacy in patients who had received prior ICI regimens; survival data for second-line cabozantinib following first-line ICI regimens provide a reference for future clinical trial design. The number of prior lines of treatment may be considered a stratification factor in randomised studies. Prospective data on systemic treatment following prior immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) are lacking. This phase II clinical trial provides efficacy and safety data on cabozantinib in patients who had received prior ICI-based treatment. Exploratory analyses showed that the performance of cabozantinib differed significantly when used as a second- or third-line treatment. The above data could be used as a reference for clinical practice and the design of future clinical trials on subsequent treatment lines following ICIs. NCT04588051.

Cost-effectiveness of immune checkpoint inhibitors in treating metastatic urothelial cancer.

Objectives: Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) is an important treatment option for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) patients. A lot of clinical evidence proved the survival benefits of ICI, but cost-effectiveness of the treatment remains unclear. This study evaluates the cost-effectiveness of the ICIs treatment in different sequences among mUC patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed mUC patients who had been treated at our hospital between January 2016 and December 2020. These patients received chemotherapy with or without ICI treatment (Pembrolizumab, Atezolizumab, Nivolumab, Durvalumab, or Avelumab). The patients were divided into three different groups: receiving chemotherapy alone, receiving a combination of first-line ICI and chemotherapy (ICI combination therapy), and receiving chemotherapy as the first-line treatment followed by second-line ICI therapy (Subsequent ICI therapy). The primary endpoint was cost per life day, while lifetime medical costs and overall survival were also evaluated. Results: The 74 enrolled patients had a median age of 67.0 years, with 62.2% being male. Of these patients, 23 had received chemotherapy only, while the remaining patients had received combined therapy with ICI in either first-line or as subsequent agents (37 patients had ever received atezolizumab, 18 pembrolizumab, 1 Durvalumab, 1 Nivolumab, and 1 Avelumab separately.). Fifty-five patients (74.3%, 55/74) received cisplatin amongst all the patients who underwent chemotherapy. Median overall survival was 27.5months (95% CI, 5.2-49.9) in the first-line ICI combination therapy group, and 8.9months (95% CI, 7.1-10.8) in the chemotherapy only. Median overall survival for the subsequent ICI therapy group was not reached. The median lifetime cost after metastatic UC diagnosis was USD 31,221. The subsequent ICI therapy group had significantly higher costs when compared with the ICI combination therapy group (155.8 USD per day, [IQR 99.0 to 220.5] v 97.8 USD per day, [IQR 60.8 to 159.19], p = 0.026). Higher insurance reimbursement expenses for the subsequent ICI therapy group were observed when compared with the ICI combination therapy group. Conclusion: Our real-world data suggests that first line use of ICI combined with chemotherapy demonstrates better cost-effectiveness and similar survival outcomes for mUC patients, when compared with subsequent ICI therapy after chemotherapy.

Abstract 4967: Predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): Machine learning (ML) application in real-world data

Abstract Introduction: Anti-programmed cell death (ligand)-1 ICIs are the standard of care 1L treatment for pts with aNSCLC without actionable oncogenic driver mutations. Heterogeneity in ICI utilization and outcomes is observed in real-world pts. By leveraging ML in electronic health records (EHRs), we identified predictors influencing key clinical outcomes, and developed a nomogram to predict likelihood of median PFS in 1L ICI-treated aNSCLC pts for potential risk stratification for interventions. Methods: 1L ICI-treated aNSCLC pts without ALK/ROS1/KRAS/BRAF/EGFR alterations were identified in a US oncology EHR database (ConcertAI; Jan 2015-Feb 2023). Survival ML models were trained on 112 clinical and demographic features with 5-fold nested cross-validation. The top predictors, determined by the best-performing ML model through SHapley Additive exPlanations and clinical judgement, were used to create a Cox proportional hazard (CPH) nomogram of median PFS. All models were evaluated using the concordance index (c-index). Patients were categorized as having high and low risk of progression/death at median PFS according to median risk predicted by the nomogram. Results: The study cohort had 4668 pts (median PFS: 6.1 months; 3811 events). The CPH nomogram predicting 6-month PFS had a c-index of 0.60 with the top 10 predictors identified using the XGBoost model (c-index: 0.62). Nomogram predictors included increased number of metastases, ECOG PS, cough suppressant use, WBC counts, and NLR (Table). Median probability of 6-month PFS for low- and high-risk groups was 35.9% and 19.4%, respectively. Conclusions: Future research should validate these findings and evaluate the opportunity to guide clinical practice to optimize outcomes in aNSCLC pts treated with 1L ICIs. Summary of top 10 clinical predictors at baseline Mean HR (95% CI) Max nomogram points Total metastases, n 1.15 (1.11-1.19) 100 ECOG PS, ordinal 1.14 (1.10-1.19) 55 Basophils, % 0.81 (0.73-0.90) 52 Albumin, g/dL 0.81 (0.75-0.87) 46 Chloride, mmol/L 0.98 (0.97-0.99) 46 Cough suppressants/expectorants, n 1.08 (1.03-1.14) 42 NLR 1.03 (1.02-1.05) 33 WBC counts, 103 cells/mL 1.02 (1.01-1.03) 29 PD-L1 expression, % 1.00 (1.00-1.00) 28 Presence of liver metastases 1.26 (1.15-1.39) 24 ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; NLR, neutrophils-to-lymphocytes ratio; PD-L1, programmed cell death-ligand 1; WBC, white blood cell. Citation Format: Deep K. Hathi, James Harnett, Ning Wu, Zhenxing Xu, Weishen Pan, T G. Hager, Ruben G. Quek, Shivani Aggarwal, Young Kim, Petra Rietschel, Frank Seebach, Fei Wang, Ying Li. Predicting progression-free survival (PFS) in first-line (1L) immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-treated patients (pts) with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC): Machine learning (ML) application in real-world data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4967.

Abstract 5098: Second-line treatment outcomes in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) patients after first-line immuno-chemotherapy

Abstract Background: First-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has significantly improved overall survival (OS) of ES-SCLC. However, second-line treatment options are still controversial with limited overall survival. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of different second-line regimens for relapsed ES-SCLC after first-line immuno-chemotherapy. Patients and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 96 ES-SCLC patients receiving first-line immuno-chemotherapy in Cancer Hospital Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, from Jan 2019 to Dec 2022. Clinical data were collected from electronic medical records. The clinical outcomes, including objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed by Kaplan-Meier method and standard log-rank test. Results: From January 4, 2019 to December 18, 2022, a total of 96 ES-SCLC patients received first-line immuno-chemotherapy and 49 of them went through second-line treatment in our center. Patient characteristics were listed as follows : median age 63 (31-79), male 76 (79.2%) , heavy smoker 59 (61.5%), liver metastasis 40 (41.7%), brain metastasis 33 (34.4%) and refractory recurrence 58 (60.4%). Second-line treatments included immunotherapy crossover and combination with chemotherapy (n=40), anlotinib with or without chemotherapy (n=5), chemotherapy alone (n=4). ORR of the whole group in the second-line setting was 22.4%. Median PFS was 3.23 months (95% CI 1.96-4.50). Cross-line immunotherapy failed to improved survival for relapsed ES-SCLC compared with those without ICIs ( mPFS 3.23 vs 3.13m, p=0.829). Anlotinib based treatment showed numerically superior PFS for relapsed SCLC compared with those without anlotinib therapy (mPFS 6.00 vs 3.13m, p=0.089). Conclusion: This retrospective study indicated cross-line ICIs failure to improve clinical outcome for relapsed ES-SCLC, and implied the potential benefits of anlotinib in second-line setting. Citation Format: Rui Wan, Linjie Fan, Jia Zhong, Jianchun Duan, Zhijie Wang, Xuezhi Hao, Jie Wang. Second-line treatment outcomes in Extensive Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (ES-SCLC) patients after first-line immuno-chemotherapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5098.

Abstract 6459: Molecular profiling of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or chemotherapy using multimodal real-world data

Abstract Background: Up to 85% of lung cancer patients have non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Standard of care for NSCLC includes immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and/or platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). However, therapy success is limited with up to 70% of patients not responding to ICI. Mechanisms of resistance across treatments are not fully understood. In this study, we explore real-world data to characterize molecular and genomic changes in advanced NSCLC treated with ICI, ICI+CT, or CT. Methods: Stage III/IV NSCLC patients receiving first-line (1L) ICI, ICI+CT, or CT were identified from Tempus Labs, Inc.’s de-identified, multimodal real-world database. Patients’ solid tissue biopsies taken pre- or post-1L underwent next generation sequencing with the Tempus xT assays (DNAseq of 648 genes at 500x coverage and whole transcriptome RNAseq). Patients’ clinical and outcome data were abstracted from electronic health records. We analyzed changes in gene expression, pathway enrichment, estimated immune cell components, and somatic mutations in responders (complete/partial response) and non-responders (progression/stable disease) upon 1L treatment. Results: 1L non-responders (70%, 51%, and 47%) were identified across cohorts (143 ICI, 764 ICI+CT, and 228 CT, respectively). 58% of pre-1L biopsies were taken from distal metastatic tissues. Distinct pathways altered post-1L include the downregulated E2F target pathway in CT cohort, and upregulated TNFα/NFκB signaling and the hypoxia and protein secretion pathways in ICI cohort. Significant (FDR &amp;lt; 0.05) augmented expression was observed for 90, 23, and 65 genes in non-responders vs. responders post ICI, ICI+CT, and CT, respectively. RNAseq deconvolution reveals decreased plasma and CD4+ activated T cell fraction in metastatic biopsies, whereas increased CD4+ activated T cell and monocyte fraction was seen after treatment only in ICI cohort. Genes with oncogenic driver mutations reported in NSCLC were detected including TP53 (68%), KRAS (30%), STK11 (13%), EGFR (11%), CDKN2A (10%), KEAP1 (9%), and NF1 (7%). Of the 250 mutated genes, 72 (29%) were commonly not detected post-1L, whereas 38, 3, and 8 unique genes with loss of detectable mutations were identified post-1L of ICI, ICI+CT, and CT, respectively. Since loss of detectable mutations is a sign of loss of subpopulations of cancer cells hosting such mutations that succumb to therapy, these genetic mutations could be used to select patients who can benefit from such therapy. Conclusions: Distinct molecular characteristics including tumor immune components and genomic alterations are associated with 1L response in advanced NSCLC. Real-world data analyses provide opportunity to explore distinct mechanisms of therapy resistance and identify potential biomarkers of therapy response for further validation in clinical studies. Citation Format: Xiaoyong Fu, Jordan Kardos, Paola Correa, Min Wang, Li, Jackson Egen, Shahed Iqbal. Molecular profiling of advanced non-small cell lung cancer in response to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors and/or chemotherapy using multimodal real-world data [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6459.

Abstract 4969: Investigating digital pathology tumor microenvironment features for immunotherapy outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer

Abstract Introduction The composition of the tumor microenvironment (TME) has been shown to influence response to immunotherapy (IO). In this study, we investigated digital pathology TME features of IO outcomes among patients with non-squamous, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) within a real-world dataset. Methods From the nationwide de-identified Flatiron Health-Foundation Medicine NSCLC clinico-genomic database, a cohort of 50 EGFR/ALK-negative, non-squamous NSCLC patients treated with first-line pembrolizumab monotherapy (mono-IO) or pembrolizumab in combination with carboplatin/cisplatin and pemetrexed (chemo-IO) that had available whole slide images of H&amp;E-stained tissue resection specimens were included. The de-identified data originated from approximately 280 US cancer clinics (~800 sites of care). AI-powered TME characterization models developed by PathAI (Boston, MA; commercially available as PathExplore™) were deployed on scanned H&amp;E slides to extract a panel of cell- and tissue-level human interpretable features (HIFs). Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify digital pathology features or HIFs associated with overall survival. Results 17 HIFs were associated with better survival and 19 HIFs were associated with worse survival among patients treated with mono-IO (p &amp;lt; 0.05). Lymphocyte features were among the HIFs associated with favorable survival, including density of lymphocyte cells in cancer epithelium (hazard ratio (HR) per unit standard deviation (SD) = 0.46 [0.24, 0.88], p-value = 0.02) and proportion of lymphocyte cells relative to total immune cells in cancer epithelium (HR per unit SD = 0.61 [0.39, 0.95], p-value = 0.03). Cell-level features associated with worse survival included density of fibroblast cells in stroma (HR per unit SD = 1.51 [1.01, 2.25], p-value = 0.05). These associations remained after adjusting for tumor mutational burden (TMB) (N = 29 low, 21 high) and PD-L1 status (N = 0 negative, 1 low-positive, 17 high-positive, 32 unknown). Additionally, similar associations were not observed among patients treated with chemo-IO. High lymphocyte density was associated with better survival compared to low lymphocyte density in mono-IO treated patients (adjusted HR per unit SD = 0.36 [0.18, 0.74], p-value = 0.01) but not in chemo-IO treated patients (adjusted HR per unit SD = 1.10 [0.76, 1.60], p-value = 0.6). Conclusion These results indicate that the composition of TME assessed via digital pathology may have utility in identifying NSCLC patients that will respond to first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors beyond the established IO biomarkers. Citation Format: Ericka M. Ebot, Kuei-Ting Chen, Mikayla Biggs, Douglas I. Lin, Julia A. Elvin, Garrett M. Frampton, James J. Pao. Investigating digital pathology tumor microenvironment features for immunotherapy outcome in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4969.

Abstract 5132: Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers

Abstract Background: Biliary tract cancer, typically diagnosed at advanced stages with a poor prognosis, has witnessed a glimmer of hope in the progress of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Yet, their limited response rates necessitate the search for effective biomarkers to refine patient selection. Methods: A total of 125 patients with a confirmed histological diagnosis of unresectable advanced or metastatic biliary tract cancers (BTC) who received first-line ICIs in combination with chemotherapy (chemoimmunotherapy) were prospectively enrolled. All baseline samples from 125 patients underwent targeted DNA sequencing, with an additional 62 patients undergoing RNA sequencing, and 85 patients had accessible mIHC data. The associations between molecular characteristics and the response to chemoimmunotherapy, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Results: The cohort had a median age of 63 years (range from 34 to 82) and 52.8% (66/125) were male, including 54 with gallbladder cancer, 57 with intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma, and 14 with extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. The median duration of follow-up was 14.8 months for the entire cohort, with the median PFS and OS of 6.9 months (95%CI: 6.2-7.9) and 11.8 months (95%CI: 10.3-14.8), respectively. The most mutated genes were TP53 (64/125, 51.2%), KRAS (34/125, 27.2%), ERBB2 (18/125, 14.4%), and ARID1A (17/125, 13.6%). Mutations of TP53 (51.2%, p = 0.042), BRCA2 (4.8%, p = 0.002), cytokine genes (6.4%, p = 0.004), and high tumor mutation burden (p = 0.072) demonstrated significant correlation with chemoimmunotherapy response. KRAS G12D mutations (PFS: P &amp;lt; 0.001; OS: P = 0.034) and ARID1A loss-of-function mutations (PFS: P = 0.009; OS: P = 0.012) were adverse survival factors, while high CXCL9 or CTLA4 expression was associated with response (CXCL9, P = 0.014; CTLA4, P = 0.067), improved PFS (CXCL9, P = 0.018; CTLA4, P = 0.008), and longer OS (CXCL9, P = 0.010; CTLA4, P = 0.008) under chemoimmunotherapy. Patients were classified into three subtypes using the identified survival biomarkers. Among them, Type I patients, characterized by the absence of KRAS G12D or ARID1A mutations but expressing high levels of CTLA4 or CXCL9, demonstrated the best outcomes under chemoimmunotherapy. Interestingly, further RNA analysis suggested that elevated CXCL9 expression correlated with heightened immune checkpoint expressions, including CTLA4, PD-L1, and PD-1 (all P &amp;lt; 0.001), as well as increased tumor microenvironment immune activity, findings validated in two additional independent patient cohorts both internal and external. Conclusions: Our study revealed predictive biomarkers relevant to the response and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in advanced biliary tract cancer. Citation Format: Jieer Ying, Qi Xu, Jiaojiao Ni, Hanlin Chen, Chaoqun Li, Yanru Xie, Qinhong Zheng, Jianying Jin, Junrong Yan, Xiaoying Wu, Qiuxiang Ou, Li Yuan, Wei Zhuo, Haimeng Tang. Multi-omics analysis uncovers predictive biomarkers for the efficacy and outcomes of immune checkpoint inhibitor in combination with chemotherapy in advanced unresectable biliary tract cancers [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 5132.

Abstract 6118: Sex-related disparity in immune checkpoint inhibitor benefit for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract Sex-related dimorphism in cancer incidence and immune response is widely recognized, yet the impact of an individual's sex on the effectiveness of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) for patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) remains poorly understood. In this study, we conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis to evaluate the heterogeneity of ICIs in patients with advanced ESCC. We collected studies from PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus, spanning from the inception of the databases to September 30, 2023. These studies focused on phase III randomized trials comparing first-line ICIs (PD-1/PD-L1) plus chemotherapy with chemotherapy alone for advanced or metastatic ESCC. Additionally, we reviewed abstracts and presentations from AACR, ASCO, ESMO, and WCLC. Inclusion criteria mandated the reporting of overall survival (OS) data stratified by sex and nonselective baseline PD-L1 expression. The study adhered to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. The analysis included 6 randomized clinical trials comprising 3603 ESCC patients, of whom 3090 (85.8%) were male and 513 (14.2%) were female. A significant OS benefit was observed for ICIs plus chemotherapy in all patients (HR, 0.68; 95% CI, 0.62-0.74; P &amp;lt; 0.001). Similarly, ICIs plus chemotherapy correlated with a significantly prolonged OS in males (HR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.61-0.74, P &amp;lt; 0.001). However, there was no significant OS benefit observed in females with ICIs plus chemotherapy (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.58-1.09; P = 0.148). Females had a tendency toward less benefit than males (pooled HR, 1.18; 95% CI, 0.89-1.57; P = 0.245). Our findings suggest that there is no statistically significant association between patient sex and the efficacy of ICIs for ESCC patients. Importantly, we report, for the first time, a lack of survival benefit with the ICI plus chemotherapy regimen in the first-line setting compared to chemotherapy alone in female ESCC patients. Citation Format: Chaoqi Zhang, Peng Wu, Jingjing Liu, Dongyu Li, Nan Sun, Jie He. Sex-related disparity in immune checkpoint inhibitor benefit for patients with esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 6118.

Efficacy and safety of first-line PD-L1/PD-1 inhibitors in limited-stage small cell lung cancer: a multicenter propensity score matched retrospective study.

The prognosis of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients is poor, and the standard first-line treatment for limited-stage small cell lung cancer (LS-SCLC) is still chemotherapy and thoracic radiotherapy. The primary objectives of our study were to confirm the superior efficacy of first-line immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus etoposide and platinum (EP) for LS-SCLC and find crucial biomarkers. We analyzed LS-SCLC patients from three medical centers, employing propensity score matching for group comparability. Survival outcomes were estimated by Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression analyses. Additionally, we conducted univariate and multivariate analyses to investigate potential predictive factors. Among 150 patients in our study, we successfully matched 41 pairs. The median overall survival (OS) was 29.5 months in the EP + ICIs group and 20.0 months in the EP group {hazard ratio (HR) =0.64 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.41-1.02], P=0.059}. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly extended in the EP + ICIs group (14.6 months), compared to the EP group (8.6 months) [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.28-0.63), P<0.001]. After matching, patients receiving chemo-immunotherapy had a median OS of 36.1 months, significantly surpassing those receiving chemotherapy alone (19.0 months) [HR =0.51 (95% CI: 0.28-0.93), P=0.02]. And the patients in the EP + ICIs group also had longer PFS after matching [HR =0.42 (95% CI: 0.25-0.71), P=0.001]. No significant difference in the objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between the two groups was found (ORR: EP: 81.0%, EP + ICIs: 90.0%, P=0.14; trAEs: EP: grade 1-2, 49.3%; grade 3-4, 42.5%; EP + ICIs: grade 1-2, 40.0%; grade 3-4, 49.1%, P=0.62). The multivariate analysis presented that the history of immunotherapy [EP + PD-1 inhibitors: HR =0.33 (95% CI: 0.17-0.62), P=0.001; EP + PD-L1 inhibitors: HR =0.18 (95% CI: 0.06-0.60), P=0.005] and baseline lung immune prognostic index (LIPI) [intermediate: HR =2.22 (95% CI: 1.20-4.13), P=0.01; poor: HR =2.03 (95% CI: 0.71-5.77), P=0.18] were independent prognostic factors for PFS among all LS-SCLC cases. However, no independent prognostic factor was identified for OS. Our real-world data showed promising clinical efficacy and tolerable safety of first-line programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors or programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors in cases with LS-SCLC. Additionally, LIPI may serve as a valuable prognostic factor.

Efficacy and safety of thoracic radiotherapy in extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer patients receiving first-line immunotherapy plus chemotherapy: a propensity score matched multicentre retrospective analysis

BackgroundPlatinum-etoposide chemotherapy combined with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has been recommended as the first-line standard treatment for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer (ES-SCLC). However, the effect of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) on these patients is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of TRT for ES-SCLC patients who responded to first-line ICIs and chemotherapy (CHT).MethodsPatients who received 4 to 6 cycles of ICIs and CHT as first-line therapy at three hospitals between 2018 and 2022 were included in the analysis. All patients were divided into two groups based on whether they received TRT as first-line treatment, and propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to ensure that the characteristics of two groups were well-balanced. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was toxic effects.ResultsA total of 276 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 22.3 (range, 4.0-53.73) months. After PSM, 197 patients were further analysed, and 99 of whom received TRT. The baseline characteristics were well-balanced between patients in the TRT and non-TRT groups. There were significant differences in PFS between the TRT and non-TRT groups, with the median PFS of 10.76 and 7.63 months, respectively (P = 0.014). Significantly improved OS was observed in the TRT group (21.67 vs. 16.6 months, P = 0.009). In addition, the use of TRT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS and OS of ES-SCLC patients receiving ICIs plus CHT. In terms of safety, no significant increase of any grades adverse event (AE) (P = 0.874) and G3-4 AE (P = 0.909) was observed for patients receiving TRT. Radiation esophagitis, gastrointestinal and hematologic toxicities were the most common AEs in TRT group, which were tolerable. And high-dose radiotherapy was associated with higher incidence of pneumonitis.ConclusionAddition of TRT showed significant survival benefits and well tolerability in ES-SCLC patients receiving platinum-etoposide CHT and ICIs, which could be a feasible first-line treatment strategy for ES-SCLC patients.