First-generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors Research Articles

Afatinib and Necitumumab in EGFR-Mutant Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer with Acquired Resistance to EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors

IntroductionAlthough tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are effective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harboring sensitizing epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene mutations, acquired resistance is inevitable. Preclinical studies suggest combining EGFR TKI and monoclonal antibody therapies may have activity in EGFR-mutated NSCLC that has progressed on TKI therapy alone. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated afatinib plus necitumumab in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. MethodsThis was a phase I dose-escalation, dose-expansion trial assessing the safety and efficacy of afatinib plus necitumumab. Patients had advanced or metastatic EGFR-mutated NSCLC with progression after: (1) first-generation TKI if T790M-negative; (2) subsequent line third-generation TKI if T790M-positive; or (3) third-generation TKI in the first-line setting. Dose-escalation followed a 3+3 design. The primary endpoint of dose-expansion was objective response rate (ORR). ResultsA total of 22 patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC were enrolled. The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was afatinib 40 mg oral daily plus necitumumab 600 mg intravenous on days 1 and 15 every 28 days. There were no Grade 4-5 adverse events observed, and seven patients (32%) experienced Grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (3 rash; 1 each oral mucositis, diarrhea, headache, and ventricular arrhythmia and tachycardia). In the entire cohort, there were no responses observed, the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 1.8 months, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 36% but varied between subgroups. ConclusionsAfatinib plus necitumumab was safe but showed limited activity in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC. Biomarker studies may identify patient subgroups that are more likely to benefit.

Optimizing Treatment Strategies for Egfr-Mutated Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Osimertinib: Real-World Outcomes and Insights.

Background: Osimertinib, a third-generation EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), demonstrated superior efficacy over first-generation TKIs in the FLAURA trial, resulting in its approval as first-line therapy for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the real-world application of these trial results requires an evaluation of sequential therapeutic strategies. Methods: This retrospective, non-interventional study utilized data from the Epidemiological Strategy and Medical Economics (ESME) platform, which includes information on patients treated for lung cancer since 2015. Out of 39,974 patients in the database, 624 patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC treated with osimertinib as first-line (L1, n = 198) or second-line (L2, n = 426) treatment after first- or second-generation TKIs (n = 1262) were identified. Patient demographics, disease characteristics, treatment strategies, and disease progression were examined. Survival analyses were performed using Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards models. Results: In the study population (n = 624), 73.4% were female, with a median age of 70 years (range 28-93). Brain metastases at the start of osimertinib treatment were observed in 282 patients. ECOG PS-2 was reported in 29.4% of patients. The T790M mutation in exon 20 was identified in 257/426 patients (60.3%) receiving osimertinib in L2. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 12.4 months (95% CI [10.7-14.7]) for L1 and 7.4 months (95% CI [6.2-8.7]) for L2. Median overall survival (OS) from advanced diagnosis was 28.5 months (95% CI [26.3-38.7]) for osimertinib L1 and 29.9 months (95% CI [28.6-31.8]) for osimertinib L2 (HR = 0.93; 95% CI [0.75-1.16]; p = 0.50). For L1, median OS was 27.1 months (95% CI [22.0-30.2]) for patients with cerebral metastases and 38.7 months (95% CI [26.3-52.8]) for those without (HR = 0.73; 95% CI [0.48-1.11]; p = 0.15). Discussion: Patients in the real-world ESME database exhibited a poorer prognosis compared to those in the FLAURA trial. The presence of cerebral metastases at diagnosis worsens the prognosis.

New ABL1 Kinase Domain Mutations in BCR::ABL1-Positive Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia.

Since the development of the first-generation Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor (TKI), it has played a crucial role in the treatment of BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) and chronic myeloid leukemia (CML). However, ABL1 kinase domain (ABL1 KD) mutations confer resistance to several TKIs. These mutations have been extensively studied in chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) but less so in BCR::ABL1-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL). Our study aimed to analyze the the ABL1 KD mutations in 97 consecutive newly-diagnosed adults with BCR::ABL1-positive ALL before therapy, in cytogenetic complete remission and at relapse with next generation sequencing (NGS). The relationship between ABL1 KD mutations and TKI selection was also analyzed. Previously unreported ABL1 KD mutations R239G, F401V/L, R516L and K262T were the most prevalent in pre-therapy and cytogenetic remission samples, whereas T315I/P and P-loop mutations were most prevalent in relapse samples. R239G, F401V/L, R516L and K262T are related to the BCR::ABL1 structure, whereas T315I/P and P-loop mutations directly alter kinase activity. BaF3 cells transfected with ABL1 KD F401V, K262T, R239G, or R516L mutations were resistant to imatinib but strongly inhibited by olverembatinib with IC50 values of 0.73 to 1.52nM. Meanwhile, olverembatinib had advantages in increasing complete molecular response (CMR) and good prognosis. Overall, our findings indicate the prevalence and impact of new ABL1 KD mutations in BCR::ABL1-positive ALL patients, highlighting the necessity for effective therapies targetingthese mutations.

Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors in Cancer: Current Use and Future Prospects.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have emerged as a leading targeted cancer therapy, reducing the side effects often seen with non-targeted treatments, especially the damage to healthy cells. To tackle resistance, typically caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, four generations of TKIs have been developed. Each generation has shown improved effectiveness and fewer side effects, resulting in better patient outcomes. For example, patients on gefitinib, a first-generation TKI, experienced a progression-free survival (PFS) of 10 months compared to 5 months with conventional chemotherapy. Second-generation TKI afatinib outperformed erlotinib and extended PFS to 11.1 months compared to 6.9 months with cisplatin. Third-generation TKIs further increased survival to 38.6 months, compared to 31.8 months with first-generation TKIs. This progress demonstrates the ability of newer TKIs to overcome resistance, particularly the T790M mutation, while reducing adverse effects. Ongoing research focuses on overcoming resistance from newer mutations like C797S to further improve patient survival. These developments highlight the significant progress in TKI therapy and the continued effort to refine cancer treatment. Recent research in South Korea shows that third-generation TKIs are ineffective against non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with the C797S mutation. Several trials have started showing promising in vitro and in vivo results, but more trials are needed before clinical approval. This review underscores notable advancements in the field of EGFR TKIs, offering a comprehensive analysis of their mechanisms of action and the progression of various TKI generations in response to resistance.

RET Inhibitors in RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers: Past, Present, and Future.

While activating RET fusions are identified in various cancers, lung cancer represents the most common RET fusion-positive tumor. The clinical drug development of RET inhibitors in RET fusion-positive lung cancers naturally began after RET fusions were first identified in patient tumor samples in 2011, and thereafter paralleled drug development in RET fusion-positive thyroid cancers. Multikinase inhibitors were initially tested with limited efficacy and substantial toxicity. RET inhibitors were then designed with improved selectivity, central nervous system penetrance, and activity against RET fusions and most RET mutations, including resistance mutations. Owing their success to these rationally designed features, the first-generation selective RET tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had higher response rates, more durable disease control, and an improved safety profile compared to the multikinase inhibitors. This led to lung and thyroid cancer, and later tumor-agnostic regulatory approvals. While next-generation RET TKIs were designed to abrogate uncommon on-target (e.g., solvent front mutation) resistance to selpercatinib and pralsetinib, many of these drugs lacked the selectivity of the first-generation TKIs, raising the question of what the future holds for drug development in RET-dependent cancers.

Advances and future directions in ROS1 fusion-positive lung cancer.

ROS1 gene fusions are an established oncogenic driver comprising 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Successful targeting of ROS1 fusion oncoprotein with oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) has revolutionized the treatment landscape of metastatic ROS1 fusion-positive (ROS1+) NSCLC and transformed outcomes for patients. The preferred Food and Drug Administration-approved first-line therapies include crizotinib, entrectinib, and repotrectinib, and currently, selection amongst these options requires consideration of the systemic and CNS efficacy, tolerability, and access to therapy. Of note, resistance to ROS1 TKIs invariably develops, limiting the clinical benefit of these agents and leading to disease relapse. Progress in understanding the molecular mechanisms of resistance has enabled the development of numerous next-generation ROS1 TKIs, which achieve broader coverage of ROS1 resistance mutations and superior CNS penetration than first-generation TKIs, as well as other therapeutic strategies to address TKI resistance. The approach to subsequent therapy depends on the pace and pattern of progressive disease on the initial ROS1 TKI and, if known, the mechanisms of TKI resistance. Herein, we describe a practical approach for the selection of initial and subsequent therapies for metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC based on these clinical considerations. Additionally, we explore the evolving evidence for the optimal treatment of earlier-stage, non-metastatic ROS1+ NSCLC, while, in parallel, highlighting future research directions with the goal of continuing to build on the tremendous progress in the management of ROS1+ NSCLC and ultimately improving the longevity and well-being of people living with this disease.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Lorlatinib Versus Alectinib and Lorlatinib Versus Brigatinib for ALK-Positive Advanced/Metastatic NSCLC: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons

IntroductionThe comparative efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), versus second-generation ALK TKIs as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains uncertain as there are no head-to-head clinical trials. MethodsMatching-adjusted indirect comparisons (MAICs) were conducted using phase III trial data demonstrating superior efficacy over crizotinib, a first-generation ALK TKI. MAICs were conducted to compare lorlatinib (CROWN) versus alectinib (ALEX and ALESIA) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) with matching based on prespecified effect modifiers. Efficacy outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response (OR), and time to progression in the central nervous system (TTP-CNS). Safety outcomes included Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) and AEs leading to treatment discontinuation, dose reduction, or dose interruption. ResultsLorlatinib was estimated to improve PFS compared to alectinib (ALEX) (HR: 0.54 [95% CI: 0.33, 0.88]) and brigatinib (ALTA-1L) (HR: 0.51 [95% CI: 0.31, 0.82]). Lorlatinib was estimated to improve TTP-CNS compared with brigatinib (HR: 0.19 [95% CI: 0.05, 0.71]). The estimated Grade ≥3 AE rate was higher with lorlatinib than with alectinib (RR: 1.48 [95% CI: 1.13, 1.94]); however, no differences were observed in other safety endpoints (ie, AEs leading to discontinuation, dose reduction, or interruption) or compared to brigatinib. ConclusionLorlatinib was estimated to have superior efficacy over first- and second-generation ALK-TKIs, but a higher rate of Grade ≥3 AEs compared to alectinib. These data support the use of lorlatinib as a first-line treatment for ALK+ advanced/metastatic NSCLC.

Management of Chronic Myeloid Leukemia that is Intolerant or Resistant to Front-Line Treatment

With advances in treatment for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML), the natural history of chronic phase (CP) CML has changed, with most individuals expected to live a normal life expectancy. The goal of therapy for most is to achieve a long-term deep molecular response (DMR) with the potential for medication discontinuation and treatment-free remission (TFR).1 Currently, six oral therapies have been approved for CP-CML in Canada: (1) imatinib, a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI); (2) dasatinib, (3) nilotinib, and (4) bosutinib, the second-generation TKIs (2G-TKIs); (5) ponantinib, a third-generation TKI; and (6) asciminib, specifically targeting the ABL Myristoyl pocket (STAMP) inhibitor. Classically, treatment for CP-CML has consisted of front-line imatinib and switching to a 2G-TKI upon treatment resistance or intolerance. Increasingly, patients are being prescribed an upfront 2G-TKI with the goal of achieving quicker and deeper molecular remissions and a TFR.2 Challenges arise in CML when treatment with either two TKIs (imatinib + 2G-TKI) or one 2G-TKI fails, given the lack of evidence to inform clinical decision-making at this juncture. This paper aims to define TKI failure and help guide the selection of second-line treatment after failure of front-line therapy.

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors with and without upfront CNS radiation for brain metastases in oncogene-driven non-small cell lung cancer (TURBO-NSCLC).

2019 Background: Newer generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) for NSCLC with EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements have demonstrated encouraging central nervous system (CNS) activity with CNS objective response rates, greatly improved from 1st generation TKIs. In response to these data, guideline statements have acknowledged a strategy of CNS-penetrant TKI +/- upfront stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for the treatment of select patients with BM. However, optimal use of upfront SRS for BM in these patients is controversial since upfront CNS radiation has been the historical standard of care, and there are limited data guiding patient management with upfront TKI alone. Additionally, results from a large multi-institutional series reported inferior overall survival (OS) with the omission of SRS in patients with EGFR-mutated NSCLC treated with first-generation TKI. Methods: Data on TKI-naïve patients with EGFR- and ALK-driven NSCLC with BM treated with CNS-penetrant TKIs +/- upfront SRS were retrospectively collected from 7 centers in the United States. Time to CNS progression (PD), local CNS PD, and OS were analyzed, with multivariable adjustment (MVA) in Fine and Gray and Cox proportional hazards models for baseline factors including age, sex, performance status, mutation, extracranial metastases, prior therapy, neurologic symptoms, and number and size of BM. Results: We identified 317 patients (200 TKI only and 117 TKI+SRS). 250 (79%) and 61 (19%) patients received osimertinib and alectinib, respectively. Patients who received TKI+SRS were more likely to have BM ≥1 cm (p<0.001) and neurologic symptoms (p<0.001) at baseline. The median follow-up from treatment of BM was 23 months and 26 months in the TKI and TKI+SRS groups, respectively. Median OS was similar between the TKI and TKI+SRS groups (median 41 months [95% CI: 35-NR] vs 40 months [95% CI: 40-NR], respectively; p=0.5). On MVA, TKI+SRS was associated with a significant improvement in time to CNS PD (HR 0.63; 95% CI: 0.42-0.96; p=0.033). Local CNS control was significantly improved with TKI+SRS (HR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.16-0.55; p<0.001), whereas no significant differences were observed in distant CNS control. Subgroup analyses demonstrated greater CNS control benefits with TKI+SRS in patients with BM ≥1 cm. Conclusions: This is the largest multi-institutional study comparing strategies of CNS-penetrant TKIs +/- upfront SRS in TKI-naïve patients with oncogene-driven NSCLC. The addition of SRS improved time to CNS PD and local CNS control but not OS. Patients with BM ≥1 cm may benefit the most from upfront integration of SRS. [Table: see text]

Toxicities associated with tyrosine kinase inhibitor maintenance following allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation in Philadelphia chromosome-positive acute lymphoblastic leukemia.

Allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) offers a potential cure in Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL); nonetheless, relapses are common and the major cause of mortality. One strategy to prevent relapse is tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) maintenance post-HCT, but published clinical experience is primarily with the first-generation TKI imatinib while data with newer generation TKIs are limited. We conducted a retrospective analysis of 185 Ph+ ALL patients who underwent HCT followed by TKI maintenance from 2003 to 2021 at City of Hope. Initially, 50 (27.0%) received imatinib, 118 (63.8%) received a second-generation TKI (2G-TKI), and 17 (9.2%) received ponatinib. A total of 77 patients (41.6%) required a dose reduction of their initial TKI due to toxicity. Sixty-six patients (35.7%) did not complete maintenance due to toxicity; 69 patients (37.3%) discontinued 1 TKI, and 11 (5.9%) discontinued 2 TKIs due to toxicity. Initial imatinib versus 2G-TKI versus ponatinib maintenance was discontinued in 19 (38.0%) versus 68 (57.6%) versus 3 (17.6%) patients due to toxicity (p = .003), respectively. Patients on ponatinib as their initial TKI had a longer duration of TKI maintenance versus 2G-TKI: 576.0 days (range, 72-921) versus 254.5 days (range, 3-2740; p = .02). The most common reasons for initial TKI discontinuation include gastrointestinal (GI) intolerance (15.1%), cytopenia (8.6%), and fluid retention (3.8%). The 5-year overall survival and progression-free survival for the total population were 78% and 71%, respectively. Our findings demonstrate the challenges of delivering post-HCT TKI maintenance in a large real-world cohort as toxicities leading to TKI interruptions, discontinuation, and dose reduction were common.

Stereotactic radiotherapy vs whole brain radiation therapy in EGFR mutated NSCLC: Results & reflections from the prematurely closed phase III HYBRID trial

BackgroundAll known randomized trials of stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) versus whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) for brain metastases (BMs) comprise mixed histologies. The phase III HYBRID trial (NCT02882984) attempted to evaluate the non-inferiority of SRT vs. WBRT specifically for EGFR-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (EGFRm NSCLC) BMs. MethodsInclusion criteria were ≤ 5 BMs (any size) from treatment-naïve EGFRm NSCLC. All patients started a first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor on the first day of WBRT (37.5 Gy/15 fractions) or SRT (25–40 Gy/5 fractions per tumor volume). The primary endpoint was 18-month intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS; intention-to-treat). ResultsThe trial commenced in June 2015 and was closed in April 2021 after screening 208 patients but enrolling 85 (n = 41 WBRT, n = 44 SRT; median follow-up 31 and 36 months, respectively). Respectively, 9.5 % vs. 10.2 % of patients experienced intracranial progression at 18 months, and the median iPFS was 21.4 vs. 22.3 months (p > 0.05 for all). The SRT arm experienced higher overall survival and cognitive preservation (p < 0.05 for all). The most notable reason for low enrollment was patients not wishing to risk neurocognitive decline from WBRT. ConclusionsAlthough this phase III trial was underpowered, there was no evidence that SRT yielded outcome detriments compared to WBRT for EGFRm NSCLC BMs. Lessons from prematurely closed trials are valuable, as they often provide important experiential perspectives for investigators designing/executing future trials. In the current era, randomized trials involving WBRT without cognitive sparing measures may be at high risk of underaccrual; trial investigators are encouraged to carefully consider our experience when attempting to design such trials. However, trials of molecular-/biologically-stratified patients are highly recommended as the notion of “individualized medicine/oncology” continues to expand.

Development of crizotinib-associated renal cyst in a non-small cell lung cancer patient with ALK fusion: a case report and review of the literature

BackgroundCrizotinib, an oral first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), is superior to systemic chemotherapy for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with positive rearrangement of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK). However, an increased incidence of renal and hepatic cysts has been reported in the patients on crizotinib treatment.Case presentationHere, we describe a case of a 71-year-old Chinese women developed multiple cystic lesions in kidney and liver during crizotinib treatment for the primary and metastatic NSCLC. The renal and hepatic cysts were noted by CT scan 3 months after crizotinib treatment, which were spontaneously and significantly regressed after stopping crizotinib.ConclusionsBased on literature review and our experience in this case report, we concluded that crizotinib-associated renal cyst (CARCs) has features of malignancy and abscess in radiographic imaging, and thus, pathological confirmation is necessary to avoid inappropriate treatment decision. In addition, to benefit the patients with progress-free survival (PFS), switching from crizotinib to alectinib is recommended for the treatment of NSCLC patients who developed CARCs.

Physiologically based pharmacokinetic modeling of imatinib and N-desmethyl imatinib for drug-drug interaction predictions.

The first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor imatinib has revolutionized the development of targeted cancer therapy and remains among the frontline treatments, for example, against chronic myeloid leukemia. As a substrate of cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2C8, CYP3A4, and various transporters, imatinib is highly susceptible to drug-drug interactions (DDIs) when co-administered with corresponding perpetrator drugs. Additionally, imatinib and its main metabolite N-desmethyl imatinib (NDMI) act as inhibitors of CYP2C8, CYP2D6, and CYP3A4 affecting their own metabolism as well as the exposure of co-medications. This work presents the development of a parent-metabolite whole-body physiologically based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for imatinib and NDMI used for the investigation and prediction of different DDI scenarios centered around imatinib as both a victim and perpetrator drug. Model development was performed in PK-Sim® using a total of 60 plasma concentration-time profiles of imatinib and NDMI in healthy subjects and cancer patients. Metabolism of both compounds was integrated via CYP2C8 and CYP3A4, with imatinib additionally transported via P-glycoprotein. The subsequently developed DDI network demonstrated good predictive performance. DDIs involving imatinib and NDMI were simulated with perpetrator drugs rifampicin, ketoconazole, and gemfibrozil as well as victim drugs simvastatin and metoprolol. Overall, 12/12 predicted DDI area under the curve determined between first and last plasma concentration measurements (AUClast) ratios and 12/12 predicted DDI maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) ratios were within twofold of the respective observed ratios. Potential applications of the final model include model-informed drug development or the support of model-informed precision dosing.

Nanoenabled intracellular zinc bursting for efficacious reversal of gefitinib resistance in lung cancer.

Following the identification of specific epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations, gefitinib, one of the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), has proven efficacious in targeting NSCLC that is driven by specific EGFR-activating mutations. However, most patients who initially respond to gefitinib, develop acquired resistance. In the current study, we devised a novel strategy to enhance the efficacy of gefitinib. We developed a simple and effective, nano-interrupter termed zeolitic imidazolate framework-8@Gefitinib@hyaluraonic nanoparticle (ZIF-8@G@HA NP). This nanoparticle was prepared by loading gefitinib onto a ZIF-8 nanoplatform followed by coating with hyaluronic acid (HA). The burst of Zn2+ release triggered by pH-sensitive degradation of ZIF-8@G@HA NPs was shown to enhance the efficacy of gefitinib in parental lung carcinoma HCC827 cells and overcame acquired gefitinib resistance in gefitinib drug resistant (GDR) HCC827 cells. We found that when treated with ZIF-8@G@HA NPs, Zn2+ acts synergistically with gefitinib via increased apoptosis in both parental and GDR HCC827 cells. Consistently, this in vitro activity was correlated with in vivo tumor growth inhibition. Interestingly, GDR cells were more sensitive to Zn2+ when compared with parental cells. We further found that ZIF-8 NPs overcame gefitinib resistance by triggering reactive oxygen species (ROS) generation and consequent cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase, resulting in cancer cell apoptosis. Zn2+ was also found to block P-gp activity, facilitating the accumulation of gefitinib in GDR cells, thus enhancing the anti-tumor efficacy of gefitinib resulting in reversal of gefitinib resistance. Thus, this study offers a novel and promising strategy to surmount acquired gefitinib resistance via cell cycle arrest at the G2/M phase by facilitating gefitinib accumulation in GDR cells.

Supramolecular fluorescence sensor array used for the analysis of tyrosine kinase inhibitors in biological fluids and cell imaging

Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are commonly used in tumor targeting therapy. However, the rapid analysis of TKIs remains a significant challenge, especially in complex biological fluid environments. In this work, we have constructed a supramolecular fluorescence sensor array based on a cucurbituril-dye host-guest complex. The binding affinity between the three complexes and each TKI is different, resulting in different cross-response signals of the complexes to the fluorescence of each TKI. Combined with linear discriminant analysis(LDA), five kinds of TKIs can be well identified. The supramolecular fluorescence sensor array could accurately identify and distinguish the five TKIs in water and could classify mixtures containing different concentrations of TKIs in serum. The concentration and Factor 1 exhibited a good linear relationship and the detection limit (LOD) was as low as 10−7 mol L−1. The method has good reproducibility and stability. In addition, the differentiation of four clinical concentrations of first-generation TKIs further validated the potential application of arrays in drug monitoring. Finally, our proposed array enabled drug imaging in living cells. Our array platform provided the foundation for the rapid and easy monitoring of 4-anilinoquinazoline TKIs.

Binding Thermodynamics of Fourth-Generation EGFR Inhibitors Revealed by Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.

The overexpression or mutation of the kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is strongly associated with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have proven to be effective in treating NSCLC patients. However, EGFR mutations can result in drug resistance. To elucidate the mechanisms underlying this resistance and inform future drug development, we examined the binding affinities of BLU-945, a recently reported fourth-generation TKI, to wild-type EGFR (EGFRWT) and its double-mutant (L858R/T790M; EGFRDM) and triple-mutant (L858R/T790M/C797S; EGFRTM) forms. We compared the binding affinities of BLU-945, BLU-945 analogues, CH7233163 (another fourth-generation TKI), and erlotinib (a first-generation TKI) using absolute binding free energy calculations. Our findings reveal that BLU-945 and CH7233163 exhibit binding affinities to both EGFRDM and EGFRTM stronger than those of erlotinib, corroborating experimental data. We identified K745 and T854 as the key residues in the binding of fourth-generation EGFR TKIs. Electrostatic forces were the predominant driving force for the binding of fourth-generation TKIs to EGFR mutants. Furthermore, we discovered that the incorporation of piperidinol and sulfone groups in BLU-945 substantially enhanced its binding capacity to EGFR mutants. Our study offers valuable theoretical insights for optimizing fourth-generation EGFR TKIs.

Chronic Myeloid Leukemia and Myocardial Infarction: A Nationwide Readmission Database Analysis

Introduction Chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) is a hematological malignancy with an excellent outcome. After advancements in CML treatment and the introduction of different Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI), their life expectancy is equivalent to the normal population. As a result of that, coronary artery disease is anticipated to be the leading cause of death among CML patients. It was particularly noted that TKI use is associated with the risk of endothelial dysfunction and it associated risk of cardiovascular events, including myocardial infarction. In this study, we compare the outcome of PCI in patients with CML to their matched non-CML group. Method The National readmission database (NRD) was searched from January 2016 to December 2020 for the study population. Adults above (age ≥ 18 years) with chronic myeloid leukemia hospitalized with a primary diagnosis of myocardial infarction, ST Elevation Myocardial Infarction (STEMI), and Non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) were identified using ICD 10 code. The primary outcomes were in-hospital mortality and 30-day readmission, and the secondary outcome was to compare the complications. The weighting of patient-level observations was implemented to obtain national estimates. Multivariate regression analysis models were built by including all confounders significantly associated with the outcome on univariable analysis with a cutoff P-value of 0.2. Variables deemed important determinants of the outcomes based on literature were forced into the models. For readmission comparison, we used the time-to-event Cox regression analysis. Propensity matching was done by the Greedy method. Proportions were compared using the Mantel-Haenszel Chi-square test or Fisher exact test, and continuous variables were compared using the Student t-test. All P values were two-sided, with .05 as the threshold for statistical significance. Results Out of 2727619 patients with myocardial infarction, 2124 CML patients were identified, and 888 CML patients had Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI). Patients' baseline characteristics and major outcomes were compared (table 1). The mean age of CML patients was 68.34 ± 11.14 (P&amp;lt;0.001). The analysis showed no significant difference between CML and non-CML patients after PCI for the primary outcome of death 0.93 (CI 0.49-1.80) P value 0.527 and 30 days readmission rate 1.41 (0.99-2.01) P value 0.056. Also, there was no statistical significance in developing major complications, including cardiac arrest, coronary artery dissection, cardiac tamponade, stroke, thrombosis, major bleeding, AKI, and dialysis. Discussion and Conclusion Patients with hematologic malignancies, including chronic myeloid leukemia, are at increased risk of thrombosis. In CML, thrombosis can be venous or arterial (myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accidents, and peripheral artery disease). Arterial thrombosis in CML is primarily linked to using different TKIs, and thrombotic events were reported with the second-generation TKIs like nilotinib, dasatinib, and ponatinib more often than with first-generation TKIs. The mechanism of TKI use-associated thrombosis is likely related to TKI-associated endothelial dysfunction and vascular toxicity that lead to accelerated atherosclerosis and subsequent vascular thrombosis. This increased risk might lead to an assumption of an increased risk of complications with vascular intervention like PCI. Some studies showed that PCI for hematological cancer patients with STEMI have no significant difference regarding in-hospital mortality. This analysis of patients with CML with myocardial infarction ( STEMI and NSTEMI ) showed no statistically significant difference in outcome after PCI between the two groups. There were no significant differences in mortality, 30 days readmission rate, and other complications post PCI. Therefore, diagnosis of chronic myeloid leukemia shouldn't prevent patients from receiving routine therapy and intervention because of the theoretical risk of thrombosis. This information aid in patient counseling and achieving the objective of maintaining a normal quality of life for chronic myeloid leukemia patients.

Blinatumomab with Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor for Ph-Positive B-Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (B-ALL): Multicenter Retrospective Review

Background: Ph-positive B-ALL has long been considered an adverse cytogenetic abnormality in ALL, and it is generally recommended to proceed with a stem cell transplant (SCT) in first remission. Historically, the addition of Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKI) to the stander chemotherapy backbone improved long-term survival, with better results noted in the second-generation than in first-generation TKIs. Recent reports on a non-chemotherapy-based approach with the combination of immunotherapy (Blinatumomab) and TKI showed encouraging results and potentially eliminated the need for consolidative SCT (Foà NEJM 2020, Jabbour Lancet Haematol 2023). In this retrospective analysis, we reviewed all Ph-positive B-ALL treated with blinatumomab and TKI at two major academic centers. Methods: A retrospective review of adolescents and adults (14 years or older) with Ph-positive B-ALL patients who received blinatumomab with TKI at two major institutions (KFSHRC &amp; KFMC) between 7/2018 and 7/2023. Patients who received up to 3 cycles of chemotherapy before being transitioned to therapy with blinatumomab and TKI were considered as frontline if there was no history of relapsed disease. Relapse/refractory patients with Ph-positive B-ALL treated with blinatumomab and TKI were also included in the R/R cohort, excluding patients with prior single-agent exposure to blinatumomab or ponatinib. Patients with a history of CNS disease were included. Chronic myeloid leukemia in a lymphoid blast phase (LBP-CML) treated with blinatumomab and TKI were also included. Patients were assessed for toxicity as well as for efficacy. Results: We identified 17 patients, with a median age of 40 yrs (range, 15-78): 9 pts (53%) were frontline Ph-positive B-ALL, 5 (29%) pts were relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL, and 3 (18%) were LBP-CML patients. Pt characteristics and outcomes by cohort are outlined in Table. All patients in all the cohorts achieved complete remission and were included in the RFS analysis [ Figure]. Of 7 evaluable pts in the frontline cohort, all patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL (CMR=100%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 6.9 months. In the relapse/refractory cohort, all patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL (CMR=100%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 6.7 months. In 3 patients with LBP-CML, two patients achieved complete molecular response (CMR) using PCR for BCR::ABL, and one patient achieved MMR (0.036%). No relapse was documented, with a median follow-up of 19.7 months. Only four patients proceeded to SCT, two with LBP-CML and two with newly diagnosed Ph-positive B-ALL. All patients proceeded with SCT in CMR except one with LBP-CML with positive PCR for BCR::ABL at 0.03%, although with undetectable MRD by flow cytometry (&amp;lt;0.01%). Patients were treated with dasatinib (4 patients) and ponatinib (13 patients). The median number of blinatumomab cycles was 4 (1-5). One death occurred at seven months in a patient treated with dasatinib and blinatumomab. The patient presented to the emergency department with pleural effusion and cardiac tamponade and died during her ICU stay with infectious complication. The death is likely contributed to by dasatinib. Conclusion: Although with short follow-up, combining TKI with blinatumomab seems to have a high complete molecular response rate in patients with newly diagnosed and relapsed/refractory Ph-positive B-ALL. Similar to prior reports, patients with newly diagnosed Ph-positive B-ALL perhaps they could be spared the toxicities associated with chemotherapy and the need for allogeneic hematopoietic stem-cell transplantation in the first remission using this approach. Further evaluation of this novel strategy is warranted.

Inhibiting G6PD by quercetin promotes degradation of EGFR T790M mutation

EGFRT790M mutation causes resistance to the first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the therapeutic options for sensitizing first TKIs and delaying the emergence of EGFRT790M mutant are limited. In this study, we show that quercetin directly binds with glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase (G6PD) and inhibits its enzymatic activity through competitively abrogating NADP+ binding in the catalytic domain. This inhibition subsequently reduces intracellular NADPH levels, resulting in insufficient substrate for methionine reductase A (MsrA) to reduce M790 oxidization of EGFRT790M and inducing the degradation of EGFRT790M. Quercetin synergistically enhances the therapeutic effect of gefitinib on EGFRT790M-harboring NSCLCs and delays the acquisition of the EGFRT790M mutation. Notably, high levels of G6PD expression are correlated with poor prognosis and the emerging time of EGFRT790M mutation in patients with NSCLC. These findings highlight the potential implication of quercetin in overcoming EGFRT790M-driven TKI resistance by directly targeting G6PD.

Osimertinib as a Potential Targeted Therapy for Non-Small Cell Lung Carcinoma (NSCLC) Patients with EGFR Exon 20 T790M

BACKGROUND: Emergence of drug resistance due to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Exon 20 T790M poses a challenge in the effective management of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). Significant breakthrough in the management of NSCLC with a specific genetic alteration causes substantial condition improvement in patients whose cancer progressed after first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment and who developed tumors with EGFR Exon 20 T790M mutation. The present study analyzed a cohort of NSCLC patients and investigated the incidence of the EGFR Exon 20 T790M status with Osimertinib therapy, along with its impact on survival rates.METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study on 22 NSCLC subjects who were genetically examined for EGFR status from plasmic cell free total nucleic acid. Subjects with EGFR Exon 20 T790M mutation were treated with/without Osimertinib. Demographic and clinical data were descriptively summarized, and the differences of each variable and correlation between survival rate and EGFR Exon 20 T790M were analyzed.RESULTS: Subjects with (n=13) and without (n=9) EGFR Exon 20 T790M had survival rates of 10.77±2.45 and 4.78±1.48, respectively (p=0.000). Based on 1-year survival status of subjects with EGFR Exon 20 T790M, there were 3 Osimertinib-treated survivors and 2 Osimertinib-treated non-survivors. Eight subjects with EGFR Exon 20 T790M and without Osimertinib treatment did not survive (p=0.001).CONCLUSION: Since the treatment of Osimertinib demonstrated a noteworthy survival rate among NSCLC subjects with EGFR Exon 20 T790M, thus Osimertinib could be suggested as a potential targeted therapy for NSCLC subjects with EGFR Exon 20 T790M.KEYWORDS: non-small cell lung carcinoma, EGFR, Exon 20, T790M, osimertinib