First Dose Of Study Treatment Research Articles

Weight changes in esketamine nasal spray and quetiapine extended-release treated patients with treatment resistant depression: Results from ESCAPE-TRD study

IntroductionIn ESCAPE-TRD, esketamine nasal spray (ESK-NS) significantly increased the probability of remission at Week (Wk)8 and being relapse‑free through Wk32 after remission at Wk8 versus (vs) quetiapine extended-release (QTP-XR), in patients (pts) with treatment resistant depression (TRD). Safety data were consistent with established profiles of each treatment, with no new safety signals identified (Reif et al. DGPPN 2022; P-01-04).ObjectivesTo explore weight changes and their impact on treatment discontinuation in ESCAPE-TRD.MethodsESCAPE‑TRD (NCT04338321) was a randomised, open-label, rater-blinded, phase IIIb trial comparing efficacy and safety of ESK-NS vs QTP-XR in pts with TRD. Safety analyses were conducted on pts who received ≥1 dose of study treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were defined as occurring at or after the first dose of study treatment and within 14 days/30 days (non-serious/serious) of the last dose. A ≥7% increase/decrease in weight from screening was considered for evaluation as a TEAE. Weights were measured and are reported as observed, with no missing data imputation.Results336 and 340 pts were randomised to ESK-NS and QTP-XR; 334 and 336 were included in the safety population. Over the 32-week study, a TEAE of weight increase was reported in fewer pts treated with ESK-NS than QTP-XR (9 [2.7%] vs 42 [12.5%]), leading to treatment discontinuation in 0 vs 6 (1.8%) pts, respectively. Incidences of weight increase TEAEs were balanced across pts categorised as normal, overweight or obsese by baseline body mass index (BMI; Figure). A weight decrease TEAE was reported in 7 pts (2.1%) in the ESK-NS arm vs 0 pts in the QTP-XR arm. Mean (standard deviation [SD]) weight at baseline was 76.4 (16.2) kg (ESK-NS; n=334) vs 79.1 (16.9) kg (QTP-XR; n=336). At Wk32, mean weight was maintained (76.5 [16.3] kg) in ESK-NS treated pts (n=249; mean [SD] change from baseline: 0.1 [4.0] kg) and increased (80.7 [15.6] kg) in QTP-XR treated pts (n=203; mean [SD] change from baseline: 2.5 [5.1] kg).Image:ConclusionsIncrease in weight was uncommon with ESK-NS; weight increases were more common with QTP-XR and resulted in more treatment discontinuations. Weight increase was independent from baseline BMI.AcknowledgementsWe thank the patients who participated. Funding: Janssen, medical writing: Costello Medical, UKDisclosure of InterestNone Declared

INDUCE-2: A Phase I/II, open-label, two-part study of feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab in patients with advanced solid tumors

Combining immunotherapies with distinct mechanisms of action has the potential to overcome treatment resistance and improve outcomes. The inducible T-cell co-stimulator (ICOS) agonist feladilimab is directed at enhancing T-cell activation and function, thereby promoting an antitumor response. INDUCE-2 (NCT03693612) was a Phase I/II, open-label, two-part study evaluating the anti-ICOS agonist feladilimab in combination with the anti-CTLA-4 antibody tremelimumab in patients with select advanced solid tumors. Objectives of Part 1 were to determine the safety, tolerability, and recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D) of feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab. In Part 2, the antitumor activity of the combination (administered at the RP2D determined in Part 1) was to be assessed in patients with relapsed/refractory head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Primary endpoints included the rates of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events (AEs), AEs of special interest, and serious AEs. Secondary endpoints included overall response rate, while biomarker assessment was exploratory. A total of 26 patients were enrolled, 18 (69%) of whom had completed the study at end date. One patient, in the highest dose group (24/225 mg feladilimab/tremelimumab), experienced a DLT 18 days after the first dose of study treatment. All patients experienced at least one AE; AEs led to treatment discontinuation in four (15%) patients. Partial response was observed in one patient. Feladilimab in combination with tremelimumab was well-tolerated but showed limited efficacy. Based on the totality of data from Part 1, it was decided not to continue with Part 2.

Safety and Preliminary Efficacy of DFV890 in Adult Patients with Myeloid Diseases: A Phase 1b Study

Background and Significance: Patients (pts) with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) and chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) have a high unmet medical need, with limited standard-of-care therapeutic approaches, particularly after failure of response to first-line agents, and with allogeneic hematopoietic transplant as the only potential curative option. Through the production of interleukin (IL)-1β and IL-18, the NLRP3 inflammasome has been implicated as a major driver of inflammation associated with acute and chronic inflammatory diseases. The NLRP3 pathway is activated in hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells and in the marrow microenvironment in myeloid neoplasms such as MDS and CMML contributing to ineffective hematopoiesis and clonal progression (Hamarsheh 2020; Basiorka 2016). DFV890, a small molecule NLRP3 inhibitor, blocks IL-1β and IL-18 secretion and pyroptotic cell death in response to a wide variety of NLRP3-dependent danger signals, both in vitro and in vivo. Therefore, DFV890 may disrupt the smoldering inflammation and provide disease-modifying benefits to pts by improving hematopoiesis. Study Design and Methods: This is an open-label, phase 1b, multicenter study with a randomized dose-optimization part and a dose-expansion part consisting of two groups evaluating DFV890 in pts with very low, low, or intermediate risk MDS (LR-MDS) per revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) criteria and low or intermediate-1 risk CMML (LR-CMML) per CMML-specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS) criteria (NCT05552469). Eligible pts must be 18 years of age, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤2, candidates for serial bone marrow assessments who are willing to undergo a bone marrow aspirate/biopsy during the trial, and meet one of the following: (a) IPSS-R-defined LR-MDS who failed to respond to or did not tolerate erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESAs) or luspatercept or hypomethylating agents (HMAs) and pts with del 5q who failed to respond to or did not tolerate lenalidomide; (b) CPSS-defined LR-CMML who failed to respond to or did not tolerate hydroxyurea or HMAs. Key exclusion criteria include treatment with systemic antineoplastic or any experimental therapies within 28 days (or 5 half-lives, whichever longer); unresolved treatment-related toxicities prior to the first dose of study treatment; previous treatment with agents targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome and the IL-1 pathways; prior use (≤1 week or 5 half-lives, whichever is longer) of hematopoietic colony-stimulating growth factors, thrombopoietin mimetics or ESAs; and concomitant medications, known to modulate cytochrome P450 enzymes. DFV890 is administered orally twice daily (bid) for a minimum of 24 weeks (6 cycles of treatment [1 cycle=28 days]) until treatment discontinuation. In the dose-optimization part, pts are randomized to receive either low dose or high dose bid and stratified by indications. The recommended dose (RD) determined from this part is further explored in the dose-expansion part to confirm safety and tolerability of DFV890 and explore preliminary efficacy. The primary objective is to assess safety (incidence and severity of adverse events, and dose-limiting toxicities) and tolerability to then determine the optimal RD for DFV980. Secondary objectives include assessment of DFV890 pharmacokinetics, evaluation of the preliminary efficacy of DFV890 on transfusion burden, and hematologic improvement: time to onset of transfusion independence; duration of response, best overall response, overall response rate, progression-free survival, and time to progression; and reduction in spleen volume (for CMML). Key exploratory objectives include patient perceptions of tolerability as measured by patient-reported outcomes; and determination of genetic characteristics and potential predictive markers of efficacy and/or resistance. The study is currently enrolling in Singapore, Hong Kong, and the USA with plans to treat approximately 80 pts. The first patient first visit was achieved on May 8, 2023.

Combination of Venetoclax and Azacitidine in Patients with Treatment-Naive, High-Risk Myelodysplastic Syndromes with Responses Leading to Stem Cell Transplantation

Introduction: The standard of care for patients with high-risk myelodysplastic syndrome (HR-MDS) who are eligible for intensive therapy includes allogeneic stem cell transplantation (SCT), which is potentially curative. Venetoclax (Ven) is a potent, selective, orally bioavailable BCL-2 inhibitor, which has a synergistic effect when combined with hypomethylating agents in preclinical and clinical investigations of myeloid malignancies. Previous results showed that the combination of Ven and azacitidine (Aza) is associated with an acceptable safety profile and leads to rapid and durable responses in patients with treatment-naive HR-MDS. Here, we report the clinical outcomes of patients with HR-MDS who proceeded to SCT following combination Ven+Aza treatment on the M15-531 clinical trial. Methods: M15-531 is a global, open-label, phase 1b clinical trial (NCT02942290) to identify the recommended phase 2 dose and to study the safety and efficacy of Ven+Aza. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with the following criteria: de novo treatment-naïve HR-MDS; International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS) risk categories of Int-2 or High, or Revised IPSS (IPSS-R) categories of Intermediate, High, or Very High; <20% blasts in bone marrow aspirate/biopsy; and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of ≤2. Aza was administered at 75 mg/m 2 subcutaneously or intravenously on Days 1-7 or on Days 1-5, 8, and 9 of each 28-day cycle. Ven was first evaluated at 100 once daily for 14 days of a 28-day cycle, then escalated to 200 and 400 mg in separate cohorts. Clinical outcomes with Ven+Aza treatment for patients who discontinued study treatment to undergo SCT and who did not experience disease progression are reported. Results: At the data cutoff of May 31, 2023, 124 patients were treated with all doses of Ven-based therapy, and 51 (41.1%) proceeded to allogeneic SCT. Key demographics and baseline characteristics for those who received SCT are shown in the Table. Median age was 64 years (range, 26-78), 58% had an ECOG PS of 0, and 25% had poor or very poor cytogenetic risk by IPSS-R. The median number of cycles of Ven+Aza was 3 (range, 1-22). Median time on study drug was 124 days (range, 28-763), and the median time from first dose of study treatment to SCT was 5.6 months (range, 1.4-29.7). Before SCT, 21 of 51 (41.2%) patients achieved complete remission (CR). Marrow CR (mCR) was achieved by 23 of 51 (45.1%) patients, and the composite response rate (mCR with Hematologic Improvement) was 30.4% (7 of 23; 95% CI, 13.2-52.9). The median time to best overall response (time from first dose of study drug to best response of CR, mCR, partial response, or stable disease) for Ven+Aza was 2.0 months (range, 1.0-10.4). The median overall survival was not reached for patients who achieved CR or mCR and proceeded to transplant. Among patients who underwent transplant, 64.7% (33/51) remained alive at the data cut-off date Conclusion: Early responses after Ven+Aza in patients with HR-MDS enabled them to receive allogeneic SCT. After escalating doses of the combination of Ven+Aza, 41% of patients went on to SCT. These results suggest that Ven-based regimens before SCT may provide a path to curative therapy.

Ibrutinib (Imbruvica)


 CADTH recommends that ibrutinib, in combination with venetoclax, should be reimbursed by public drug plans for the treatment of adult patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL), including those with 17p deletion only if certain conditions are met.
 In combination with venetoclax, Ibrutinib should only be covered to treat adult (≥ 18 years) patients with previously untreated CLL, including those with 17p deletion. Patients receiving Imbruvica should be in relatively good health (i.e., have a good performance status, as determined by a specialist). Patients with major surgery within 4 weeks of the first dose of study treatment, bleeding disorder, central nervous system involvement, Richter syndrome, or uncontrolled autoimmune hemolytic anemia or thrombocytopenia should not be eligible for coverage.
 Imbruvica in combination with venetoclax should only be reimbursed if prescribed by hematologists or oncologists with expertise and experience in the treatment of CLL and monitoring of therapy and if the drug program cost of Imbruvica in combination with venetoclax does not exceed the drug program cost of treatment with the least costly comparator that is reimbursed for the treatment of CLL. Patients who experience disease progression while taking Imbruvica in combination with venetoclax or who cannot tolerate the drug would not be eligible for continued coverage.

MagnetisMM-6: An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study of elranatamab + daratumumab + lenalidomide (EDR) versus daratumumab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (DRd) in transplant ineligible (TI) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).

TPS8065 Background: Elranatamab, a humanized bispecific antibody targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells, has shown promising efficacy and acceptable safety in clinical studies, as monotherapy (MagnetisMM-3, NCT04649359) and in combination with daratumumab (MagnetisMM-5, NCT05020236), in the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Despite recent advances in the treatment of NDMM, MM remains incurable and more effective treatment options are needed. The aim of the MagnetisMM-6 study (NCT05623020) is to evaluate EDR versus DRd for TI patients with NDMM. Methods: MagnetisMM-6 is an ongoing, open-label, 2-arm, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study estimated to enroll ~646 patients. There are 2 parts: Part 1 evaluates the safety and recommended phase 3 dose (RP3D) of EDR: Part 2 evaluates the efficacy and safety of EDR at RP3D vs DRd in TI patients with NDMM. TI is defined as age ≥65 or age < 65 with comorbidities impacting the possibility of transplant. The primary endpoints of Part 2 are minimal residual disease (MRD) at 12 mo and progression-free survival. Secondary endpoints include overall and sustained MRD negativity rates, duration of MRD negativity, objective response rate, complete response (CR) rate, time to response, duration of response, duration of CR, overall survival, safety, quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics. Part 1 includes TI patients with NDMM as well as patients with RRMM who have received 1−2 prior lines of therapy including ≥1 immunomodulatory drug and ≥1 proteasome inhibitor. Part 2 includes only TI patients with NDMM. Key inclusion criteria are: ≥18 y; a diagnosis of MM (according to International Myeloma Working Group [IMWG] criteria); an ECOG performance status ≤2; and measurable disease based on IMWG criteria (serum M-protein ≥0.5 g/dL, urinary M-protein excretion ≥200 mg/24 hr, or involved serum free light chain [FLC] ≥100 mg/L and abnormal serum immunoglobulin κ:λ FLC ratio [ < 0.26 or > 1.65]). Key exclusion criteria are: smoldering MM; monoclonal gammopathy; Waldenström’s macroglobulinemia; plasma cell leukemia; active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infections; previous systemic treatment for MM (NDMM patients only); previous treatment with a BMCA-directed therapy or anti-CD38-directed therapy ≤6 mo of the first dose of study treatment (RRMM patients only); or stem cell transplant ≤3 mo of the first dose of study treatment or active graft versus host disease (RRMM patients only). As of February 2023, the study is open and enrolling at 9 sites in 5 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT05623020 .

MagnetisMM-7: An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study of elranatamab versus lenalidomide in post-transplant patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma.

TPS8066 Background: Elranatamab is a humanized bispecific antibody targeting B cell maturation antigen (BCMA) on myeloma cells and CD3 on T cells. Elranatamab has shown promising efficacy and acceptable safety in pts with relapsed and/or refractory multiple myeloma (MM). The aim of the MagnetisMM-7 study is to evaluate elranatamab monotherapy vs lenalidomide monotherapy in pts with newly diagnosed MM (NDMM) after undergoing autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Methods: MagnetisMM-7 is an ongoing, open-label, 2-arm, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study estimated to enroll ~700 pts. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT05317416. Pts are randomized to receive either subcutaneous elranatamab or oral lenalidomide once daily. After initial step-up dosing, two alternative dosing regimens of elranatamab are examined. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by blinded independent review per International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) criteria (up to ~5 y). Secondary endpoints include overall survival, minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity rate at 12 mo after randomization per IMWG criteria as assessed via next-generation sequencing (NGS), sustained MRD negativity rate at 24 mo after randomization as assessed via NGS, PFS by investigator, duration of MRD negativity, complete response (CR) rate, duration of CR, safety, quality of life, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics. Key inclusion criteria are: ≥18 y; a diagnosis of MM with measurable disease according to IMWG criteria; history of induction therapy for NDMM, followed by high dose therapy and ASCT with or without consolidation; partial response or better according to IMWG criteria; identification of the dominant malignant clone; and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1. Randomization must occur ≤120 d from ASCT; for pts who receive consolidation therapy after ASCT, randomization must occur ≤60 d of consolidation and ≤7 mo of ASCT. Key exclusion criteria are: plasma cell leukemia; amyloidosis; Waldenström's macroglobulinemia; POEMS syndrome; known active CNS involvement or clinical signs of myelomatous meningeal involvement; previous MM maintenance treatment; prior treatment with BCMA-targeted therapy; any other active malignancy ≤3 y of enrollment; active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infection; and previous administration of an investigational drug or vaccine ≤30 d or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of study treatment. As of February 2023, the study is open and enrolling at 29 sites in 13 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT05317416 .

AtezoCab: A phase II study of cabozantinib (C) in combination with atezolizumab (A) in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) with non-measurable disease (NMD).

TPS295 Background: Preclinical studies and clinical observations suggest that C promotes an immune permissive environment, which might lead to synergistic effects from combination treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. In Cohort 6 of COSMIC-021 study, the combination of C and A showed encouraging clinical activity and acceptable tolerability in mCRPC pts who had radiographically progressed in soft tissue on or after novel hormonal treatment (NHT; PMID: 35690072). CONTACT-02 is a phase 3 study randomizing pts with mCRPC with measurable disease 1:1 to C+A or NHT (NCT04446117). The objective of this study is to specifically evaluate the safety and efficacy of C+A in pts with mCRPC with NMD. Methods: AtezoCab is an IRB approved, investigator-initiated, single-arm, single-center, open-label, non-randomized phase 2 study of C+A in mCRPC patients with NMD to assess disease control rate (DCR). Treatment: C 40 mg oral daily + A 1200 mg intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment continues until progression or intolerable toxicities. Key inclusion criteria: ≥18 years age, mCRPC with histologically or cytologically confirmed adenocarcinoma without small cell histology, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤ 2, adequate organ function, prior treatment with NHT, only NMD outside the pelvis (above aortic bifurcation) per RECIST 1.1 criteria. Key exclusion criteria: prior chemotherapy for mCRPC, prior treatment with C, immune checkpoint inhibitors or other systemic immunostimulatory agents, active or history of clinically significant autoimmune disease per treating physician, corticosteroids (> 10 mg daily prednisone equivalent) or other immunosuppressive medications within 14 days before first dose of study treatment. Primary endpoint: Percentage of pts with disease control. DCR will be defined as the percentage of pts with confirmed response of any duration or stable disease or noncomplete response or nonprogressive disease for 24 weeks or longer per PCWG3-modified RECIST v1.1. Up to 33 pts will be enrolled for a total of 30 evaluable pts. This will ensure that DCR can be estimated via a 95% confidence interval (CI) with margin of error <0.18. The primary analysis CI on DCR will be based on Wilson’s approach. Secondary Endpoints: Progression-free survival (PSA and radiographic), PSA50% response rate, overall survival and safety. Tissue and blood samples will be collected for correlative studies. 7 patients have been enrolled. Clinical trial information: NCT05168618 .

Magnetismm-4: An Open Label, Phase 1B/2 Umbrella Study of Elranatamab in Combination with Other Anti-Cancer Treatments for Patients with Multiple Myeloma

Background Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific molecule that targets multiple myeloma (MM) cells via B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) and T cells via CD3 to induce T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. In MagnetisMM-1 (NCT03269136), an ongoing, phase 1 study in patients with relapsed or refractory MM (RRMM), subcutaneous (SC) elranatamab yielded an overall response rate (ORR) of 64% and had a manageable safety profile (Jakubowiak et al, J Clin Oncol, 2022). In the phase 2 MagnetisMM-3 (NCT04649359) study in patients with heavily pretreated RRMM, SC elranatamab was well tolerated and yielded an ORR of 61% at the recommended phase 2 dose (Lesokhin et al, J Clin Oncol, 2022). Study Design and Methods MagnetisMM-4 (NCT05090566) is a phase 1B/2, open label, non-randomized, multicenter, umbrella study of elranatamab in combination with other anti-cancer treatments for patients with MM. The estimated enrollment is 105 patients. The study is split into 2 sub-studies (Figure 1). In each sub study, a 2 step-up priming dose of elranatamab will be employed to mitigate the risk of cytokine release syndrome and a Bayesian logistic regression model will be utilized for dose escalation. Sub-study A (SSA) is comprised of 2 phases in which patients will receive elranatamab + the gamma-secretase inhibitor (GSI) nirogacestat. Studies have shown that GSIs block BCMA cleavage and can potentially enhance BCMA-directed therapy (Eastman et al, Blood, 2019; Pont et al, Blood, 2019; Cowan et al, Blood, 2019). Phase 1 of SSA is designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and select a recommended dose and regimen for the combination of elranatamab and nirogacestat. The primary endpoint for SSA Phase 1 is dose limiting toxicity (DLT) up to 35 days. Phase 2 of SSA will further evaluate the efficacy and safety of the combination of elranatamab and nirogacestat. The primary endpoint for SSA phase 2 is objective response rate (ORR) assessed every 4 weeks for ~2 years. A key secondary endpoint in both phases of SSA is the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). In sub-study B (SSB), patients will receive elranatamab + lenalidomide + dexamethasone. The dose escalation part of SSB is designed to assess the safety and tolerability of elranatamab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The primary outcome of the dose escalation part is DLT up to 42 days. The dose expansion part of SSB is designed to evaluate the overall safety profile of elranatamab in combination with lenalidomide and dexamethasone. The primary endpoints of the dose expansion part of SSB are incidence of TEAEs and laboratory abnormalities across the duration of the study. A key secondary endpoint in SSB is ORR. Additional secondary endpoints in both SSA and SSB are time to response, duration of response, complete response (CR) rate, duration of CR, progression-free survival, overall survival, minimal residual disease negativity rate, immunogenicity to elranatamab, and elranatamab pharmacokinetics. Inclusion criteria in SSA and SSB include age ≥18 years, RRMM with ≥3 prior lines of therapy, refractory to at least one immunomodulatory drug, one proteasome inhibitor, and one anti-CD38 antibody, measurable disease by serum M-protein ≥0.5g/dL, urinary M-protein excretion ≥200mg/24h, or serum immunoglobulin free light chain (FLC) ≥10mg/dL and abnormal serum immunoglobulin kappa to lambda FLC ratio, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status ≤1 (Table 1). Exclusion criteria include active plasma cell leukemia, amyloidosis, stem cell transplant within 12 weeks prior to enrolment or active graft-versus-host disease, POEMS syndrome, any active uncontrolled infection, impaired cardiovascular function or clinically significant cardiovascular disease within 6 months prior to enrolment, and previous administration with an investigational drug within 30 days or 5 half-lives preceding the first dose of study treatment. In SSA, patients who received prior treatment with a BCMA-bispecific antibody are excluded, and in SSB, patients who received prior treatment with BCMA-directed therapy are excluded. The study is enrolling the Phase 1 portions and is being opened at multiple sites in the United States and Canada. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

ASC4START: A Phase IIIb, Open-Label, Randomized Study of Tolerability and Efficacy of Asciminib Versus Nilotinib in Patients with Newly Diagnosed Philadelphia Chromosome-Positive Chronic Myelogenous Leukemia in Chronic Phase

Objectives: Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have greatly improved treatment outcomes for patients with newly diagnosed chronic myelogenous leukemia in chronic phase (CML-CP), transforming it into a chronic disease requiring long-term treatment. This emphasizes the need for treatments that combine high efficacy with a favorable safety profile, improving over currently available options. Asciminib is a first-in-class BCR::ABL1 inhibitor specifically targeting the ABL myristoyl pocket (STAMP) which has been approved by the FDA with subsequent approvals worldwide for patients with Philadelphia chromosome-positive (Ph+) CML-CP, previously treated with ≥2 prior TKIs based on the results of the ASCEMBL (NCT03106779) trial. The ABL specificity of asciminib compared with the selectivity of second-generation (2G) TKIs can reduce off-target effects and improve tolerability while maintaining efficacy and reducing the probability of developing resistance. The ongoing ASC4FIRST (NCT04971226) study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of asciminib vs investigator-selected TKI in patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. Additional data on asciminib in newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP may help to address patient-centric objectives, in particular the ability of patients to remain on treatment without having to permanently discontinue due to adverse events (AEs). The ASC4START study (NCT05456191) will primarily evaluate the tolerability of asciminib vs the 2G TKI nilotinib in adult patients with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP, as measured by the time to study treatment discontinuation due to adverse event (TTDAE). The study will also report on further safety, efficacy and quality of life (QoL) outcomes. Methods: This is a phase IIIb, multi-center, open-label, randomized study in patients ≥18 years of age with newly diagnosed Ph+ CML-CP. The trial will enroll approximately 541 patients with CML-CP diagnosed within 3 months of study entry and an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status ≤1. Patients cannot be included if they have received previous treatment for CML with any other anticancer agents (except hydroxyurea and/or anagrelide), have confirmed central nervous system infiltration, or present impaired cardiac function or abnormalities in cardiac repolarization. Patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive asciminib 80 mg once daily or nilotinib 300 mg twice daily, both administered orally under fasting conditions; randomization will be stratified based on European Treatment Outcome Study long-term survival (ELTS) score at diagnosis (high vs intermediate vs low) to help achieve balance between the treatment arms (Figure). The primary endpoint is TTDAE, defined as the time from the date of the first dose of study treatment to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to an AE. Secondary endpoints include type, frequency and severity of AEs; dose modifications due to AE; changes in laboratory values that fall outside pre-determined ranges; clinically notable ECG changes; time to discontinuation due to selected reasons (lack of efficacy/treatment failure/disease progression/suboptimal response/death); major molecular response (MMR), MR4, MR4.5, complete hematological response (CHR), and BCR::ABL1 ≤1% at and by all scheduled data collection time points; duration of and time to first MMR, MR4 and MR4.5; time to treatment failure; event-free survival, progression-free survival and overall survival. Secondary endpoints related to QoL include change from baseline in overall scores and individual scales of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaires QLQ-C30 and QLQ-CML24. Participants will be treated in the study until approximately 64 discontinuations due to AEs are met; treatment duration for an individual patient is expected to be 2‒4.5 years. Current status: The study is recruiting as of October 2022. This study was sponsored by Novartis Pharmaceuticals. Figure 1View largeDownload PPTFigure 1View largeDownload PPT Close modal

MagnetisMM-5: An open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study of elranatamab as monotherapy and in combination with daratumumab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

TPS8074 Background: Elranatamab (PF-06863135) is a humanized bispecific antibody that targets both B cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-expressing multiple myeloma (MM) cells and CD3-expressing T cells, with binding resulting in T cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Elranatamab has demonstrated antitumor activity and delayed tumor progression in preclinical studies, as well as promising efficacy and manageable safety in the ongoing phase 1 MagnetisMM-1 study in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory MM (Bahlis et al, J Clin Oncol 2021). Methods: MagnetisMM-5 is an open-label, multicenter, randomized phase 3 study designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous (SC) elranatamab monotherapy and SC elranatamab + SC daratumumab in pts with relapsed/refractory MM who have received prior therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor (PI). The study consists of 2 parts. In part 1, a minimum of 20 pts will be enrolled to assess the safety of an elranatamab priming regimen and identify the recommended combination dose for SC elranatamab + SC daratumumab for part 2. The primary endpoint of part 1 is dose-limiting toxicities encompassing the elranatamab monotherapy priming duration (14 d) and the first cycle of SC elranatamab + SC daratumumab dosing (28 d). In part 2, ̃450 pts will be stratified by prior lines of therapy (1 vs 2–3 vs ≥4) and prior treatment with anti-CD38 therapy (yes vs no) and enrolled in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive SC elranatamab or SC elranatamab + SC daratumumab or SC daratumumab + oral pomalidomide + oral dexamethasone. The primary endpoint of part 2 is progression-free survival (PFS), according to International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) response criteria and blinded independent review. Secondary endpoints include PFS and PFS on next-line treatment by investigator per IMWG, overall survival, objective response rate, duration of response, complete response (CR) rate, duration of CR, time to response, overall and sustained minimal residual disease negativity rates, safety, quality of life, immunogenicity, and PK. Key inclusion criteria are age ≥18 y, MM diagnosis with measurable disease according to IMWG criteria, ECOG performance status 0–2, and clinical laboratory values within specified ranges. For part 2, pts should have received ≥1 prior line of anti-myeloma therapy, including treatment with lenalidomide and a PI. Key exclusion criteria include smoldering MM, plasma cell leukemia, amyloidosis, POEMS syndrome, stem cell transplant within 12 wk of enrollment, primary refractory MM, active, uncontrolled bacterial, fungal, or viral infections, previous treatment with BCMA-targeted therapy, anti-CD38 therapy within 6 mo of the first dose of study treatment, and previous pomalidomide therapy. MagnestisMM-5 will include sites in 28 countries. Clinical trial information: NCT05020236.

Abstract LBA035: Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: CANOPY-N Trial

Abstract Background: Complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five-year survival rates in this population range from 19% to 50%, with most patients dying from distant recurrence. As neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy yields a modest 5% absolute overall survival benefit for these patients with NSCLC, new treatment options are needed. Preliminary data with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have shown major pathologic responses (MPRs) or pathologic complete responses in patients with resectable NSCLC. In the CANTOS study, reduced incidence of NSCLC and decreased lung cancer–related mortality were observed in a dose-dependent manner in patients with atherosclerosis who received canakinumab (interleukin 1β inhibitor) versus those who received placebo. In preclinical NSCLC humanized models, treatment with canakinumab ± anti–PD-1 inhibitor has shown promising activity, and a synergistic effect was observed with this combination, which may enhance the efficacy of PD-1 inhibition by modulating pro-tumor inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. In this context, the CANOPY-N study was designed to evaluate the effect of canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable NSCLC. Methods: CANOPY-N (NCT03968419) is a Phase II, randomized, open-label study evaluating the effect of canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable NSCLC. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (excluding N2 and T4 tumors), no prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and eligibility for surgery with a planned resection in approximately 4-6 weeks after first dose of study treatment are eligible to participate. An archival (if obtained up to 6 months before first day of treatment) or new biopsy is required. Approximately 110 patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio (stratified by histology [squamous/nonsquamous]) to receive a total of 2 doses (200 mg every 3 weeks) of canakinumab alone (n=44) or in combination with pembrolizumab (n=44) or pembrolizumab alone (n=22), with safety follow-up up to 130 days from last study-drug dose. The primary endpoint is MPR rate (≤10% of residual viable tumor cells at time of surgery), and secondary endpoints include overall response rate per RECIST 1.1, MPR rate based on local assessment, surgical feasibility rates, safety, incidence of antidrug antibodies, pharmacokinetic parameters, and assessment of the relationship between blood- or tissue-based biomarkers and MPR. As of May 27, 2021, there are 44 active study locations. Citation Format: Jay M. Lee, Jean-Louis Pujol, Pilar Garrido, Edward S. Kim, Masahiro Tsuboi, Rafael Caparica Bitton, Jiawei Duan, Cecile Blin, Alexander Savchenko, Tony Mok. Canakinumab or Pembrolizumab as Monotherapy or in Combination as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Patients With Resectable Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: CANOPY-N Trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR-NCI-EORTC Virtual International Conference on Molecular Targets and Cancer Therapeutics; 2021 Oct 7-10. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Ther 2021;20(12 Suppl):Abstract nr LBA035.

Cardiovascular outcomes in adults with migraine treated with eptinezumab for migraine prevention: pooled data from four randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies

BackgroundPatients with migraine have an increased relative risk of cardio- and cerebrovascular events, and some migraine treatments may exacerbate this risk. The primary objective of this analysis was to determine whether the rate of cardiovascular adverse events was higher for patients with migraine treated with the migraine-preventive eptinezumab, compared with patients receiving placebo.MethodsCardiovascular outcomes in patients with migraine were pooled across four clinical trials (phase 1b, phase 2, and two phase 3 trials) for use of eptinezumab as a preventive migraine treatment for up to 1 year. In all studies, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that occurred after the first dose of study treatment (eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, 1000 mg, or placebo) and vital signs were recorded through study completion.ResultsCardiovascular TEAEs were rare across all four clinical trials, and rates were similar between patients receiving eptinezumab and those receiving placebo. Cardiovascular TEAEs that did occur were mild or moderate in severity; there were no serious adverse events as per FDA definition. Vital signs (systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate) were not meaningfully different across treatment groups over the course of 56 weeks, compared to placebo. Treatment with eptinezumab did not result in significant new or changed cardiovascular medications used concomitantly compared to placebo.ConclusionsIn this post hoc analysis of four clinical trials for eptinezumab, doses of 100 mg, 300 mg, and 1000 mg (more than 3 times the highest approved dose) were not associated with clinically relevant changes in vital signs or significant changes in concomitant cardiovascular medication usage, and had low incidences of cardiovascular TEAEs, comparable to placebo.Trial registrationNCT01772524 (Study 2), 01/21/2013; NCT02275117 (Study 5), 10/27/2014; NCT02559895 (PROMISE-1), 09/25/2017; NCT02974153 (PROMISE-2), 11/28/2016

Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor-Containing Regimens in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies (αCD38 mAb)

Efficacy and Safety of Selinexor-Containing Regimens in Patients with Multiple Myeloma Previously Treated with Anti-CD38 Monoclonal Antibodies (αCD38 mAb)

Abstract CT237: Canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer: CANOPY-N trial

Abstract Background: Complete surgical resection is the standard treatment for patients with stage I-IIIA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Five-year survival rates range from 19% to 50%, with most patients dying from distant recurrence. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy improves overall survival (OS) by only 5% in patients with NSCLC, and new treatment options are needed. Preliminary data for PD1 or PD-L1 inhibitors as neoadjuvant therapy have shown major pathologic responses (MPRs) or pathologic complete responses (pCRs) in patients with early-stage NSCLC. The CANTOS study demonstrated reduced incidence of NSCLC and decreased lung cancer-related mortality with canakinumab (interleukin 1β inhibitor) versus placebo, in a dose-dependent manner for patients with atherosclerosis. In preclinical NSCLC humanized models, treatment with canakinumab ± anti-PD-1 inhibitor could lead to antitumor activity. Combination of canakinumab and pembrolizumab is expected to enhance the efficacy of PD-1 inhibition by inhibiting dysregulated inflammation in the tumor microenvironment. Based on available evidence, the CANOPY-N study was designed to evaluate the effect of canakinumab and pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment for patients with resectable NSCLC. Methods: CANOPY-N (NCT03968419) is a Phase II, randomized, open-label study evaluating the effect of canakinumab and pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant treatment in patients with resectable NSCLC. Patients with histologically confirmed stage IB-IIIA NSCLC (excluding N2 and T4 tumors), no prior systemic therapy, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0 or 1, and eligibility for surgery and with a planned surgical resection in approximately 4-6 weeks (after first dose of study treatment) are eligible to participate. An archival (if obtained up to 6 months before first day of treatment) or new biopsy is required. Approximately 110 patients will be randomized in a 2:2:1 ratio (stratified by histology [squamous/nonsquamous]) to one of the treatment arms to receive a total of 2 doses (200 mg every 3 weeks) of canakinumab alone (n=44) or in combination with pembrolizumab (n=44) or pembrolizumab alone (n=22), with safety follow-up up to 130 days from last study drug dose. The primary endpoint is MPR rate (≤10% of residual viable tumor cells at time of surgery), and secondary endpoints include determination of overall response rate, MPR rate based on local review, surgical feasibility rates, incidence of antidrug antibodies, and pharmacokinetic parameters. As of October 19, 2020, there are 36 active study locations. Citation Format: Jay M. Lee, Tony Mok, Pilar Garrido, Edward S. Kim, Çağatay Arslan, Masahiro Tsuboi, Tuochuan Dong, Cecile Blin, Vanessa Rodrik-Outmezguine, Bijoyesh Mookerjee, Vanessa Passos, Jean-Louis Pujol. Canakinumab or pembrolizumab as monotherapy or in combination as neoadjuvant therapy in patients with surgically resected non-small cell lung cancer: CANOPY-N trial [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr CT237.

Crizanlizumab 5.0 Mg/Kg Increased the Time to First on-Treatment Sickle Cell Pain Crisis: A Subgroup Analysis of the Phase II Sustain Study

Abstract Background: In the 52-week SUSTAIN study, which compared the P-selectin inhibitor crizanlizumab with placebo, crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg significantly reduced the frequency of sickle cell pain crises (SCPCs) versus placebo (1.6 vs 3.0, P=0.01) and increased the time to first on-treatment SCPC (4.1 vs 1.4 months, P=0.001) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD) (Ataga KI et al. N Engl J Med 2017;376:429-39). Due to heterogeneity in disease severity and differences in medications used for the treatment of SCD and various other factors, treatment responses may vary between individuals with SCD. Differences in the response to crizanlizumab observed in defined subgroups of patients are of interest to increase understanding of this treatment, and the role of P-selectin in SCD. Aims: This post hoc analysis evaluated the time to first SCPC in subgroups of the SUSTAIN study population to further assess the efficacy of crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg and differences in treatment response between those subgroups. Methods: SUSTAIN was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase II study (NCT01895361). Patients aged 16-65 years with SCD (HbSS, HbSC, HbSβ0-thalassemia, HbSβ+-thalassemia or other genotype) were included if they had experienced 2-10 SCPC events in the previous 12 months. Concomitant use of hydroxyurea (HU) was permitted if the patient had been using it for ≥6 months and at a stable dose for ≥3 months. Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to receive intravenous crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg, 2.5 mg/kg or placebo; however, this abstract focuses on the 5.0 mg/kg dose of crizanlizumab versus placebo. Study treatments were administered on days 1 and 15, then every 4 weeks to week 50; the final study visit of the treatment phase was at week 52, with an additional follow-up visit at week 56. The median time to first SCPC after the first dose of study treatment was summarized for patients treated with crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg or placebo in the following subgroups: 2-4 or 5-10 SCPC events in the previous 12 months; HbSS or non-HbSS genotype; and HU use (yes or no) at baseline. Hazard ratios (HRs) for crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg versus placebo were calculated based on Cox regression analysis, with treatment as a covariate. Results: 67 patients in the intent-to-treat population received crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg and 65 received placebo. Overall, more patients who had experienced 2-4 SCPCs (63% in both groups) than 5-10 SCPCs (37% in both groups) in the previous year were enrolled. HbSS was the most common genotype (crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg: 70%; placebo: 72%), and more than half of patients were taking HU at baseline (crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg: 63%; placebo: 62%). In almost all the subpopulations evaluated, crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg significantly (P Conclusions: Treatment with crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg significantly delayed the time to first on-treatment SCPC in adults living with SCD compared with placebo in most of the subpopulations investigated, including patients with the HbSS genotype, suggesting a potential for disease modification. Crizanlizumab 5.0 mg/kg was also effective in those individuals taking HU who had still experienced 2-10 SCPCs in the previous year, indicating that P-selectin inhibition provided additional beneficial treatment effect compared with HU alone. Download : Download high-res image (213KB) Download : Download full-size image Disclosures Kanter: Sancillo: Research Funding; Apopharma: Research Funding; MUSC: Other: The site PI for sponsored research conducted at MUSC who receives funds from: Novartis, bluebird bio, GBT, Sancillo, Apopharma, Pfizer; GBT: Research Funding; Pfizer: Research Funding; American Society of Hematology (Sickle Cell Disease Guideline Panel): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; NHLBI (sickle cell disease research advisory committee): Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; AstraZeneca: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bluebird Bio: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Kutlar: Novartis: Research Funding; BlueBird Bio: Other: Member of Data Monitoring Committee; Sancilio & Co (OMEG-411-02): Other: Chair of Data and Safety Monitoring Board; Reprixys Pharmaceuticals Corporation (formerly known as Selexys Pharmaceuticals Corporation, which is not affiliated with Selexis S.A.): Research Funding. Liles: Pfizer: Research Funding. Bruederle: Novartis: Employment. Shi: Novartis: Employment. Zhu: Novartis: Employment. Ataga: Reprixys Pharmaceuticals Corporation (formerly known as Selexys Pharmaceuticals Corporation, which is not affiliated with Selexis S.A.): Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Global Blood Therapeutics: Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria; Global Blood Therapeutics: Honoraria; Global Blood Therapeutics: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Selinexor containing regimens in patients with multiple myeloma (MM) previously treated with anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies (αCD38 mAbs).

e20020 Background: Exportin 1 (XPO1) mediates the nuclear export and functional inactivation of tumor suppressor proteins, is required for MM growth, is associated with poor prognosis in MM and mediates resistance to standard MM therapies. Selinexor (SEL) is a first-in-class, oral selective inhibitor of nuclear export (SINE) compound approved in combination with dexamethasone (dex) ± bortezomib for patients (pts) with previously treated MM. Once MM becomes refractory to αCD38 mAb, pts have limited effective treatment options and poor prognosis. Overall response rate (ORR) to the first regimen after refractoriness to an αCD38 mAb is 31%, median progression-free survival (mPFS) is 3.4 months (m), and median overall survival (mOS) is 8.6 m. The doublet SEL-dex (Xd) has shown ORR ̃26% in triple-class (IMID, PI, αCD38 mAb) refractory MM; SEL-based triplets could be more effective in this population. Methods: STOMP (Selinexor and Backbone Treatments of Multiple Myeloma Patients) is a multi-arm, open-label, Phase 1b/2 study evaluating SEL in various triplet combinations. Here, we retrospectively analyzed the efficacy and safety of SEL-containing triplets in pts previously treated with αCD38 mAbs. Pts received SEL-dex (Xd) plus pomalidomide (XPd, n = 19), bortezomib (XVd, n = 4), lenalidomide (XRd, n = 4), daratumumab (XDd, n = 2) or carfilzomib (XKd, n = 18). ORR, mOS, mPFS and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. Results: Among the 47 pts, median age 64 yrs, female 53%, median time from diagnosis 5.1 yrs, median number of prior regimens 5 (range, 2–11). Prior daratumumab (96%), isatuximab (4%); 96% had MM refractory to aCD38 mAb, 81% had triple-class refractory MM, 74% and 47% were quad- and penta-exposed, 43% and 15% had quad- and penta-refractory MM. αCD38 mAb was included in the immediate prior regimen of 57% of pts and median duration from end of most recent aCD38 mAb therapy to first dose of study treatment was 6.9 weeks (range, 2.6-114.9). ORR was 51% among the 45 evaluable pts, 59% in the XPd arm (n = 17; 2 pts were not efficacy evaluable) and 67% in the XKd arm. ORR was 47% (9/19) among pts with quad-refractory MM and evaluable efficacy. Among all evaluable pts mPFS was 8.8 m (95% CI: 4.9, NE) and mOS was 20.4 m (95% CI: 9.6, NE). Among the 25 pts with αCD38 mAb in their immediate prior regimen, efficacy was similar to that regimen: ORR 52% vs. 45%, mPFS 8.8 vs. 9.3 m. The most common treatment emergent AEs were nausea (72%), anemia (64%), thrombocytopenia (60%), fatigue (57%), which were managed with standard supportive care and dose modifications. Conclusions: SEL-containing triplets in pts with MM previously treated with αCD38 mAbs, most of whom had triple-class refractory MM, exhibit tolerability and comparable effectiveness to their most recent αCD38 mAb-containing regimens. Compared to historical control, mOS was much higher among these patients. Further investigation is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02343042.

The Courage study: A first-in-human phase 1 study of the CBP/p300 inhibitor FT-7051 in men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

TPS5085 Background: Prostate cancer is the second leading cause of cancer-related death among men in the U.S., largely due to metastatic disease that progresses despite hormonal therapy (tx). The role for androgen receptor (AR) signaling in prostate cancer and hormone tx resistance is well-established. CBP/p300 are essential co-activators of AR-mediated transcription. FT-7051 is an oral, potent, and selective inhibitor of CBP/p300 with activity in preclinical models of prostate cancer including models resistant to currently used AR inhibitors like enzalutamide. The Courage Study (NCT04575766) is a first-in-human, multicenter, phase 1, open-label study examining the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), preliminary anti-tumor activity, and pharmacodynamics (PD) of FT-7051 for the treatment of men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) who have progressed despite prior tx and have been treated with at least one approved androgen receptor pathway inhibitor. The study will enroll up to 45 men with mCRPC at ̃8-15 US sites. Methods: The study employs a Bayesian optimal interval (BOIN) design with an accelerated titration. Patients (pts) will initially be enrolled in a dose level cohort size of 1 until a Grade 2 or higher toxicity occurs that is considered related to FT-7051 or the highest dose level is reached. Upon completion of the accelerated titration phase, subsequent cohorts will enroll 3-5 pts. Treatment: FT-7051 capsules will be administered on a 28 d cycle (21 d on / 7 d off) with Dose Levels -1 to 7 assigned per protocol using the BOIN design. Key inclusion criteria: Diagnosis of mCRPC with either adenocarcinoma or mixed histology AND rising PSA; previously failed at least one approved androgen receptor pathway inhibitor; ≥ 18 yrs of age; prior taxane chemotherapy permitted. Key exclusion criteria: Previous solid organ transplant, prior anticancer tx including prior tx with small molecules within 4 wks of first dose of study treatment, prior radiation tx within 4 wks prior to initiation of study treatment, prior androgen antagonist tx within 2 wks, prior radium-223 tx within 6 wks. Endpoints: Primary endpoints are to define the recommended phase 2 monotherapy dose of FT-7051 through assessments of DLTs, SAEs, clinically relevant AEs, and clinically relevant safety laboratory values. Key secondary endpoints include: PSA at 12 wks, time to PSA progression, time to radiographic progression, overall response rate, and plasma PK parameters. PD assessments of CBP/p300 inhibition in surrogate tissue, biomarker assessments in CTCs (AR, AR-v7), and peripheral blood are included. Duration: Pts will remain on study treatment until they are deemed to be no longer clinically benefiting (NLCB) by the treating Investigator or until unacceptable toxicity. Pt may be followed for survival for up to 24 months from last dose of study treatment. The first pt was dosed January 2021. Clinical trial information: NCT04575766.

Efficacy and Tolerability of Daratumumab with Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with One Prior Lenalidomide-Based Regimen: Preliminary Results of the Phase 2 Daria Study

Efficacy and Tolerability of Daratumumab with Ixazomib and Dexamethasone in Patients with One Prior Lenalidomide-Based Regimen: Preliminary Results of the Phase 2 Daria Study

Daratumumab with Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Severe Renal Impairment: Results on Efficacy and Safety of the Phase 2 Dare Study

Daratumumab with Dexamethasone in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma and Severe Renal Impairment: Results on Efficacy and Safety of the Phase 2 Dare Study