You have accessJournal of UrologyProstate Cancer: Markers I1 Apr 20122104 PROSPECTIVE MULTICENTER EVALUATION OF PCA3 AND TMPRSS2-ERG GENE FUSIONS AS DIAGNOSTIC AND PROGNOSTIC BIOMARKERS FOR PROSTATE CANCER Gisele Leyten, Daphne Hessels, Erik Cornel, Theo de Reyke, Henk Vergunst, Paul Kil, Ben Knipscheer, Sander Jannink, Frank Smit, Hans de Jong, Inge van Oort, Peter Mulders, and Jack Schalken Gisele LeytenGisele Leyten Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Daphne HesselsDaphne Hessels Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Erik CornelErik Cornel Hengelo, Netherlands More articles by this author , Theo de ReykeTheo de Reyke Amsterdam, Netherlands More articles by this author , Henk VergunstHenk Vergunst Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Paul KilPaul Kil Tilburg, Netherlands More articles by this author , Ben KnipscheerBen Knipscheer Emmen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Sander JanninkSander Jannink Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Frank SmitFrank Smit Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Hans de JongHans de Jong Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Inge van OortInge van Oort Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , Peter MuldersPeter Mulders Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author , and Jack SchalkenJack Schalken Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2012.02.2272AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookTwitterLinked InEmail INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES In 2007 it was published that the combined use of urine markers PCA3 and TMPRSS2-ERG gene fusions (T2:ERG) increased diagnostic sensitivity for prostate cancer. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic and prognostic value of Progensa PCA3 and T2:ERG (as individual biomarkers and as a panel) in a prospective multicenter setting. METHODS Prospective multicenter study (6 clinics) in which post-DRE first-catch urine specimens were collected prior to prostate biopsy. Progensa PCA3 and T2:ERG (quantitative nucleic acid amplification assay to detect T2:ERG mRNA) were assessed and correlated (individually and as a marker panel) to prostate cancer diagnosis, Gleason score, and clinical T stage. This was compared to serum PSA. In a subgroup (n=61) prostatectomy outcome was evaluated. The independent sample T-test and the non-parametric Mann Whitney test were used. RESULTS Of the 497 men that were included, urine samples of 443 men contained sufficient mRNA for marker analysis. Table 1 shows the diagnostic and prognostic values of the markers. Prostate cancer was diagnosed in 196/443 men. Serum PSA, PCA3 and T2:ERG were all significantly correlated with diagnosis prostate cancer. PCA3 using cutoff 25 had the strongest correlation (p=6.3×10-13), exceeding serum PSA. By combining PCA3 and T2:ERG the correlation improved significantly (p=5.4×10-17). The AUC (area under the curve) increased from 0.720 (only PCA3) to 0.760 for the marker panel PCA3+T2:ERG. The sensitivity increased from 68% to 76%. T2:ERG was significantly correlated with biopsy Gleason score, clinical T stage, and extracapsular extension. PCA3 had no correlation with these prognostic parameters. CONCLUSIONS PCA3 is a strong diagnostic marker for prostate cancer. By combining PCA3 and T2:ERG the diagnostic value and the AUC increases evidently. In this prospective multicenter study T2:ERG had significant prognostic value, there was no correlation of PCA3 with Gleason score and T stage. © 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 187Issue 4SApril 2012Page: e848-e849 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2012 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Gisele Leyten Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Daphne Hessels Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Erik Cornel Hengelo, Netherlands More articles by this author Theo de Reyke Amsterdam, Netherlands More articles by this author Henk Vergunst Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Paul Kil Tilburg, Netherlands More articles by this author Ben Knipscheer Emmen, Netherlands More articles by this author Sander Jannink Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Frank Smit Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Hans de Jong Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Inge van Oort Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Peter Mulders Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Jack Schalken Nijmegen, Netherlands More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement Advertisement PDF downloadLoading ...
Read full abstract