First-attempt Success Rate Research Articles

Endotracheal intubation using a spiral endotracheal tube effectively reduces total tube handling time in children aged one month to six years using a McGrathTM video laryngoscope: a prospective randomized trial.

Airway management in children is challenging because of the smaller size, different proportions of anatomical structures compared to adults, and a higher risk of hypoxemia. Efforts to improve the efficiency of pediatric intubation can be made by manually twisting a spiral endotracheal tube (ETT) using a flexible stylet to manipulate its shape and angle. This controlled trial randomized fifty children aged one month to six years who underwent elective surgery under general anesthesia into two groups (spiral ETT [sETT] and no-stylet ETT/standard ETT). The sETT was formed by twisting the ETT using a handmade tool. The primary objective was to determine the effectiveness of the sETT compared to the standard ETT in reducing intubation time. Secondary objectives were ETT placement accuracy, first-attempt intubation success rate, and adverse effects. The mean total tube handling time in the sETT group was significantly shorter compared to the no-stylet ETT group (sETT 16.8 ± 3.6 vs. standard ETT 18.8 ± 3.7 seconds; P = 0.049). sETT placement had a significantly greater central placement accuracy (odds ratio, 4.846; 95% confidence interval, 1.287-18.255; P = 0.015). However, first-attempt successful intubation rate (sETT 80% vs. standard ETT 64%, P = 0.208) and total intubation time (sETT: 46.5 ± 5.2 vs. standard ETT 48.4 ± 4.9 seconds; P = 0.205) were not significantly different. No adverse effects were observed for either ETT type. Spiral ETT effectively reduces total tube handling time and improves ETT placement accuracy in children using video laryngoscopy.

Ultrasound-guided versus palpation-guided techniques for vessel catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Abstract Background Pediatric heart surgery is the first treatment option for congenital heart disease, which is the leading cause of death in Children. Arterial cannulation (AC) and Central venous catheter (CVC) are required in pediatric cardiac surgery for continuous monitoring of the central venous pressure (CVP), replacement of fluid and blood products, close hemodynamic monitoring, and frequent sampling for arterial blood gases (ABG). Purpose We aim to assess the efficacy and safety of the ultra-sound guided technique compared to the traditional palpation-guided technique for vessel catheterization in children undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods A systematic review and meta-analysis synthesizing evidence from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) studies obtained from PubMed, Embase Cochrane, Scopus, and WOS until February 2024. We used the fixed-effects model to report dichotomous outcomes using risk ratio (RR) and continuous outcomes using mean difference (MD) with a 95% confidence interval (CI). Results Thirteen RCTs with 1060 children were included. Regarding arterial cannulation, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant increase in successful cannulation [RR: 1.31 with 95% CI (1.10, 1.56), P< 0.0001], and first-attempt success [RR: 1.88 with 95% CI (1.35, 2.63), P< 0.0001]; however, it was not associated with any statistically significant difference in venous cannulation in both outcomes with [RR: 1.13 with 95% CI (0.98, 1.30), P= 0.10], [RR: 1.53 with 95% CI (0.86, 2.71), P= 0.15] respectively. Moreover, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the number of attempts either in arterial cannulation with [MD: -0.73 with 95% CI (-1.00, -0.46), P< 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: -1.34 with 95% CI (-2.55, -0.12), P= 0.03], and the time of attempted cannulation also either in arterial cannulation with [MD: -2.27 with 95% CI (-3.38, -1.16), P< 0.0001] or in venous cannulation with [MD: -4.13 with 95% CI (-7.06, -1.19), P< 0.0001]. Finally, ultrasound-guided technique was associated with a statistically significant decrease in the incidence of any complications either in arterial cannulation with [RR: 0.36 with 95% CI (0.18, 0.71), P< 0.001] or in venous cannulation with [RR: 0.30 with 95% CI (0.11, 0.84), P= 0.02]. Conclusion Ultrasound-guided arterial catheterization increases the number of successful catheterizations and first-attempt success rate; however, there was no significant difference in venous cannulation, while both arterial and venous cannulation were associated with decreased number of attempts, reduced overall procedure time, and decreased incidence of complications.

Awake Supraglottic Airway Placement in Pediatric Patients for Airway Obstruction or Difficult Intubation: Insights From an International Airway Registry (PeDI).

Small case series have described awake supraglottic airway placement in infants with significant airway obstruction and difficult intubations. We conducted this study to determine outcomes when supraglottic airways were placed in awake children enrolled in the international Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry including success of ventilation, success of tracheal intubation, and complications. We reviewed the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry to identify all cases of awake supraglottic airway placement before planned tracheal intubation from August 2012 to September 2023 with subsequent review of details of awake supraglottic airway placement in the medical record. We present descriptive statistics of patient demographics, ventilation and intubation outcomes, and complications. A supraglottic airway was placed in an awake child in 95 of 8061 (1.2%) cases in the Pediatric Difficult Intubation Registry. Median age was 37 days (range 0-17.6 years) and median weight was 3.7 kg (1.6-46.7 kg). Sixteen (17%) cases were in patients older than 2 years and 7 (7%) were in adolescents. Adequate ventilation via a supraglottic airway was achieved in 81/95 (85%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 77%-93%) encounters. Inadequate (n = 13) or impossible (n = 1) ventilation occurred in 14/95 (15%). No complications were reported with supraglottic airway placement. For subsequent intubation, there was a 35% (33/95) first-attempt success rate and 99% (94/95) eventual success, with 1 patient awakened after failed attempts at tracheal intubation. Hypoxia occurred during the first intubation attempt in 9/95 (9%) encounters. The incidence of hypoxia was lower in encounters in which ventilation via the supraglottic airway was adequate (4/81, 5%) than in encounters in which ventilation via the supraglottic airway was inadequate or impossible (5/14, 36%). Although infrequently attempted, awake placement of a supraglottic airway in children with difficult airways achieved adequate ventilation and provided a conduit for oxygenation and ventilation after induction of anesthesia across a spectrum of ages.

Visual rigid laryngoscopy versus video laryngoscopy for endotracheal intubation in elderly patients: A randomized controlled trial.

To assess the efficacy and safety of visual rigid laryngoscopy and video laryngoscopy and to provide clinical information for developing a more suitable intubation tool for elderly patients. In 75 consecutive elderly patients undergoing elective surgery in a single institution, tracheal intubation was randomly performed by 2 experienced anaesthesiologists using visual rigid laryngoscopy (Group I, n = 38) or video laryngoscopy (Group II, n = 37). The primary outcome was intubation time. Secondary outcomes were the first-attempt success rate of tracheal intubation, haemodynamic responses at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation and the incidence of postoperative airway complications, including immediate complications and postoperative complaints. The intubation times were 35.0 (30.0-41.5) s and 42.5 (38.0-51.3) s in Groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.001). The difference in direct complications between the two groups was statistically significant (P < 0.05). In contrast, there was no significant difference between the two groups regarding the follow-up of the main complaint 30 min and 24 h after tracheal extubation (P > 0.05). There was no difference in the intubation success rate between the 2 groups (P > 0.05). The haemodynamic responses at 1, 3, and 5 min after intubation were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Compared with that of video laryngoscopy, the intubation time of visual rigid laryngoscopy in elderly patients was shorter. At the same time, visual rigid laryngoscopy reduced the incidence of immediate complications. However, during endotracheal intubation, there was no significant difference in haemodynamics between the two groups. ChiCTR2100054174.

Video laryngoscopy may improve the intubation outcomes in critically ill patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

BackgroundThe role of video laryngoscopy in critically ill patients requiring emergency tracheal intubation remains controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to evaluate whether video laryngoscopy could improve the clinical...

Comparison between the standard method and the 30° curved tongue depressor-aided technique for insertion of a laryngeal mask airway: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundLaryngeal mask airway (LMA) has been increasingly used for airway management; however, LMA insertion can be difficult and cause adverse effects. Therefore, the rapid, safe, and effective insertion of LMA is necessary. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the standard method with that of the 30° curved tongue depressor-aided technique for LMA insertion to determine the superior technique.MethodsThis study included 154 patients aged 18–70 years (American Society of Anesthesiologists class I or II) scheduled for general anesthesia. The patients were randomly assigned to the standard LMA insertion group (Group C, n = 77) or the 30° curved tongue depressor-aided LMA insertion group (Group T, n = 77). The primary outcome evaluated was the first-attempt success rate. The secondary outcomes were the second-attempt success rate, insertion time, fiberoptic position grade, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OPLP), and adverse events.ResultsThe first-attempt success rate was significantly higher in Group T than in Group C (97.40% vs. 88.31%, P = 0.029). The second-attempt success rate (P = 0.209), insertion time (P = 0.340), fiberoptic position grade (P = 0.872), and OPLP (P = 0.203) were slightly improved in Group T; however, there was no statistical significance. Bleeding events were reduced in Group T than in Group C (6.49% vs. 14.29%); however, there was no statistical significance. The incidence of sore throat symptoms was significantly reduced in Group T than in Group C (5.19% vs. 15.58%, P = 0.035).ConclusionsThe curved tongue depressor-aided technique significantly improved the first-attempt success rate of LMA insertion and reduced the incidence of sore throat symptoms.Trial registrationKCT0004964; Registered at https://cris.nih.go.kr on April 27, 2020.

Handheld ultrasound versus standard machines for placement of peripheral IV catheters: A randomized, non-inferiority study

IntroductionUltrasound guided IV catheter (USGIV) access occurs frequently in Emergency Departments (EDs). This task is often performed using large, expensive, cart-based ultrasound systems (CBUS) which are frequently needed for other ED ultrasound functions and can be cumbersome to use and store. Handheld ultrasounds (HHUs) may be able to meet this need, but it is unknown if they function interchangeably with CBUS for USGIV placement. We performed a prospective, randomized, noninferiority study to compare the success rate of HHUs to CBUSs for placing USGIVs. MethodsED patients 18 and older needing an USGIV were approached for enrollment and randomized to receive an USGIV placed by CBUS or HHU. USGIVs were placed by any ED physician or nurse trained in placement. A placement was considered attempted upon needle entry into the skin. An USGIV was successful if it was immediately flushable with saline. Data was collected on the success of IV placement, number of attempts, IV and provider characteristics, patient demographics, and length of time the USGIV lasted. Demographics and operator and IV characteristics were analyzed using Pearson's Chi square, Fischer's Exact test, or Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Non-inferiority was assessed using the Farrington-Manning test. Results were approached per protocol and analyzed in R. Results312 patients were enrolled. Patient and IV characteristics were similar between groups. There was no difference in the number of successful USGIVs placed in either group (p≥0.9) with 146 in the CBUS group and 145 in the HHU group. There was no difference in the first attempt success rate between groups (p = 0.8) and HHU was noninferior to CBUS for successful USGIV placement (p = 0.0001). The rate of premature USGIV failure was similar between HHU and CBUS (4.0 % and 6.7 %). ConclusionHHU was noninferior to CBUS for successful USGIV placement. There was no difference in the rate of first attempt success at placement or USGIV survival to a patient's ED disposition between groups. No significant additional training was required for ED providers of all levels to use the HHUs.

Ramped versus sniffing position for Ambu® AuraGainTM insertion in patients with obesity: a randomized controlled study.

The ramped position facilitates mask ventilation and endotracheal intubation in patients with obesity. This study aimed to determine whether the ramped position improves supraglottic airway (SGA) insertion in patients with obesity. In this prospective, randomized, single-center trial, 48 obese patients undergoing elective surgery were randomized into either ramped or sniffing position groups. The Ambu® AuraGainTM (Ambu A/S), a second-generation SGA, was used. The primary outcome was the time required for the AuraGain insertion. Secondary outcomes included ease and number of insertion attempts, oropharyngeal leak pressure (OLP), and complications. The number needed to treat (NNT) was calculated to ensure ease of insertion. The time required for the AuraGain insertion was significantly shorter in the ramped group than in the sniffing group (13.0 [11.0, 16.0] vs. 24.0 [21.0, 28.0], P < 0.001). The insertion was easier in the ramped group than in the sniffing group (23/24 vs. 13/24, NNT = 2.4 [95% CI, 1.6, 5.0], P = 0.003). The first-attempt success rate was higher in the ramped group than in the sniffing group, although the difference was not statistically significant (22/24 vs. 18/24, P = 0.319). The OLP and postoperative complication rates were not significantly different between the groups. The ramped position reduced the time required for the AuraGain insertion in obese patients while providing comparable airway sealing without increasing adverse events. Therefore, a ramped position may be a more suitable option for SGA insertion in this population.

Laryngeal mask vs. laryngeal tube trial in paediatric patients (LaMaTuPe): a single-blinded, open-label, randomised-controlled trial.

In hypoxemic children with difficult airway, or for minor elective procedures, the use of a supraglottic airway device may be preferred to endotracheal intubation, whether with a laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube. Second-generation laryngeal masks may offer a better safety profile. Whether they should be preferred to laryngeal tubes is unknown. This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of second-generation laryngeal masks and laryngeal tubes in children. This randomised-controlled trial was conducted in a single university hospital in children <18 years undergoing elective anaesthesia in urology, minor paediatric surgery and gynaecology. Patients were 1 : 1 randomised to the laryngeal mask or laryngeal tube group. Children were allocated a second-generation laryngeal tube or a second-generation laryngeal mask as the primary airway device. The primary endpoint was insertion time. Secondary endpoints included first-attempt success, overall success and complications, which included hypoxia (SpO2 < 90%), laryngospasm, bronchospasm, aspiration and bleeding. In total, 135 patients were randomised, with 61 allocated to the laryngeal tube and 74 to the laryngeal mask group, with a median age of 5.4 and 4.9 years, respectively. Median insertion time was significantly longer in the laryngeal tube group (37 vs. 31 s; difference of medians: 6.0 s; 95% confidence interval: 0.0-13.0). The laryngeal tube had a significantly lower first-attempt (41.0%) and overall success rate (45.9%) than the laryngeal mask (90.5% and 97.3%, respectively). Those allocated to the laryngeal tube group had a higher ratio of complications (27.8%) compared to the laryngeal mask group (2.7%). This randomised-controlled trial reported that in children undergoing elective anaesthesia, the use of a laryngeal tube was associated with a longer insertion time.

A Comparison of Conventional Rotating Method and Non-Rotating Method for Double-Lumen Tube Insertion Using a Customized Rigid J-Shaped Stylet for One-Lung Ventilation: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Background: The conventional double-lumen tube (DLT) insertion method requires a rotatory maneuver that was developed using direct laryngoscopy and may not be optimal for video laryngoscopy. This study compared a new non-rotatory maneuver with the conventional method for DLT insertion using video laryngoscopy. Methods: Patients scheduled for thoracic surgery requiring one-lung ventilation were randomly assigned to either the rotating (R) or non-rotating (NR) method groups. All patients were intubated using a customized rigid J-shaped stylet, a video laryngoscope, and a left-sided silicone DLT. The conventional rotatory maneuver was performed in the R group. In the NR group, the stylet was inserted with its tip oriented anteriorly (12 o'clock direction) while maintaining the bronchial lumen towards the left (9 o'clock direction). After reaching the glottic opening, the tube was inserted using a non-rotatory maneuver, maintaining the initial orientation. The primary endpoint was the intubation time. Secondary endpoints included first-trial success rate, sore throat, hoarseness, and airway injury. Results: Ninety patients (forty-five in each group) were included. The intubation time was significantly shorter in the NR group compared to the R group (22.0 [17.0, 30.0] s vs. 28.0 [22.0, 34.0] s, respectively), with a median difference of 6 s (95% confidence interval [CI], 3-11 s; p = 0.017). The NR group had a higher first-attempt success rate and a lower incidence of sore throats. Conclusions: The non-rotatory technique with video laryngoscopy significantly reduced intubation time and improved first-attempt success rate, offering a viable and potentially superior alternative to the conventional rotatory technique.

Use of ultrasound for vascular access during cardiac catheterisation in children with congenital heart disease: a Swiss multicentre cohort study.

Our study aimed to assess the first-attempt success rate of ultrasound (US) and anatomical landmark (ALM) guidance for vascular cannulation in children with congenital heart disease in Switzerland. A prospective observational multicentre study was conducted from January 2022 to January 2023 in three university hospitals in Switzerland. We included patients with congenital heart disease aged 0 to 18 years who were scheduled for elective cardiac catheterisation. Periprocedural data were collected anonymously. The choice of vessel and guidance technique were at the operator's discretion. 177 arterial and 240 venous cannulations in 253 patients were analysed. The median age and weight were 4.4 years (interquartile range [IQR] 1.2-8.8) and 15 kg (IQR 8-27), respectively. Nearly all operators, 97.5%, were deemed experienced. The femoral artery and femoral vein were the most preferred vessels. US guidance was used in 62% of procedures, predominantly within populations who were younger, smaller and of lower weight.The success rate at the first attempt was notably higher with US guidance for arterial cannulation (US: 80%, ALM: 37%, p <0.001) and venous cannulation (US: 78% vs ALM: 47%, p <0.001). Overall success rates for venous and arterial cannulation were comparable between ultrasound and anatomical landmark guidance. A total of 45 complications (10.5%) occurred, with immediate uncomplicated haematoma being the most frequent. US guidance is preferred for the localisation and cannulation of vessels during cardiac catheterisation within paediatric cardiology departments in Switzerland. Given its high success rate for first-attempt cannulation, US warrants additional research to evaluate its potential in reducing complications.

Flow-mediated dilation facilitates radial artery cannulation in patients undergoing intravenous general anesthesia: A prospective randomized controlled trial.

Flow-mediated dilation (FMD) is commonly used as a diagnostic tool to assess endothelial function, and compared with other methods for stimulating radial artery dilation, FMD offers several advantages such as non-invasiveness, ease of execution, minimal equipment requirements, and negligible risk. The study aimed to investigate the effect of FMD in facilitating radial arterial cannulation in the context of intravenous general anesthesia. Eighty patients undergoing intravenous general anesthesia and requiring radial artery cannulation were randomized 1:1 to the FMD group and control group. Patients in the FMD group received an upper arm occlusion for 5 min after anesthesia induction, and the cuff was placed without inflation for the equivalent duration in the control group. The primary outcome was first-attempt success rate. Secondary outcomes were the diameter and percentage of dilation of radial artery, overall success rate, total number of attempts, cannulation time, and occurrence of procedure-related complications. Intravenous anesthetic agents significantly dilated the radial artery (p < 0.05), which was further increased by FMD. An increase in both the first-attempt and overall success rate of radial artery cannulation was demonstrated with the use of FMD (67.5% vs 42.5%, p < 0.05). The total number of attempts needed to cannulate the radial artery was reduced in the FMD group as compared with the control group (p < 0.05), but no differences in cannulation time and procedure-related complications were found between the two groups (p > 0.05). FMD induced by a 5-min upper arm occlusion may facilitate radial artery cannulation in patients undergoing intravenous general anesthesia.

A new video laryngoscope combined with flexible laryngeal mask insertion: A prospective randomized study

BackgroundThe video laryngoscope (VLS) has been proven to be an effective insertion device for airway management. However, no laryngoscope has been specifically designed for the placement of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA). We improved the current VLS and developed a novel VLS method. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical efficacy of an improved VLS for inserting a flexible laryngeal mask airway (F-LMA) compared with the standard blind method. MethodsOne hundred and fifty-seven patients who underwent F-LMA insertion under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to either the standard blind insertion technique (group B) or VLS -assisted insertion (group VL). First attempt success rates were recorded. Secondary outcomes included oropharyngeal leakage pressure (OLP), fiberoptic view, insertion time, position adjustment, reinsertion rate, and postoperative airway morbidity. ResultsThe first-attempt success rate was higher in group VL than that in group B (99% vs. 86%; p = 0.002). The OLP was significantly higher in the VLS-guided technique (26.4 ± 5.1 vs 23.8 ± 4.4 cmH2O, p = 0.002). The fiberoptic view was significantly better in the group VL (p < 0.001) and required less readjustment and reinsertion to establish an effective airway (p < 0.001). The insertion time was shorter in the group B than that in group VL (33.9 vs 41.3 s, p < 0.001). Hemodynamic stress responses and postoperative airway complications did not differ between the two groups. ConclusionsThe new VLS-guided insertion technology has a high success rate, achieves greater OLP, and provides an ideal anatomical position with minimal adjustment, without increasing the risk of hemodynamic stress or adverse events. Trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2300075866; https://www.chictr.org.cn).

Evaluation of the i-gel® Plus supraglottic airway device in elective surgery: a prospective international multicentre study.

The i-gel® Plus is a modified version of the i-gel® supraglottic airway device. It contains a wider drainage port; a longer tip; ramps inside the breathing channel; and an additional port for oxygen delivery. There has been no prospective evaluation of this device in clinical practice. This international, multicentre, prospective cohort study aimed to evaluate the performance of the i-gel Plus in adult patients undergoing elective procedures under general anaesthesia. The primary outcome was overall insertion success rate, defined as the ability to provide effective airway management through the device from insertion until the end of the surgical procedure. Secondary outcomes included device performance and incidence of postoperative adverse events. Data from the first 1000 patients are reported. In total, 1012 patients were enrolled; 12 forms were excluded from the final analysis due to incomplete data leaving 1000 included patients (545 female). Overall insertion success rate was 98.6%, with a first-attempt success rate of insertion of 88.2%. A significant difference between females and males was seen for the overall success rate (97.4% vs. 99.6% respectively) but not for first-attempt successful insertion. Mean (SD) oropharyngeal seal pressure was 32 (7) cmH2O. The only independent factor that increased the risk of first-attempt failure was low operator experience. Complications included desaturation < 85% in 0.6%; traces of blood on the device in 7.4%; laryngospasm in 0.5%; and gastric contents inside the bowl in 0.2% of patients. The i-gel Plus appears to be an effective supraglottic airway device that is associated with a high insertion success rate and a reasonably low incidence of complications.

A comparative study of head-elevated positions at 25° versus 45° for intubation in obese patients posted for elective surgery under general anesthesia

Background: Obese patients generally present with an increased risk of difficult intubation. The head-elevated position has been shown to improve laryngeal view, reduce airway complications, and prolong safe apnea time during intubation as compared to the sniffing position. Aims and Objectives: The aim of this study is to compare the head-elevated positions at 25° versus 45° for intubation in obese patients, in terms of ease of intubation assessed by first-attempt intubation success rate and laryngeal exposure using Cormack–Lehane grading and to assess intubation time, use of intubation aides, changes in hemodynamic parameters, and hypoxia. Materials and Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, 100 consenting patients undergoing elective surgery requiring general anesthesia were selected who fulfilled the eligibility criteria and assigned to either of the two groups by block randomization: Group A – 25° or Group B – 45° head-elevated positions for intubation in a tertiary care hospital (February 2021–July 2022). Results: The 45° head-elevated position was found to provide a better laryngeal exposure, the mean time to intubate was lesser and the first attempt success rate was also higher. Further, 45° head-elevated position is better chosen as per anesthesiologist comfort, using Likert scale grading. Conclusion: This study concluded that 45° head-elevated position provides better ease of intubation in obese patients as compared to 25° head-elevation.

Clinical Utility of Ultrasonographic Guidance for Arterial Catheterization in Patients with Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial

ObjectivesWe aimed to compare the success and complication rates of radial artery catheterizations between ultrasound guidance and conventional palpation technique in obese patients by anesthesia residents with similar levels of experience in both methods. Another objective was to measure the skin-to-artery distance of radial, brachial, and dorsalis pedis arteries using ultrasound with standardized anatomical landmarks. DesignProspective, randomized controlled trial SettingSingle tertiary center ParticipantsEighty adults with a body mass index (BMI) ≥ 30 kg·m-2 InterventionsUltrasound guidance or conventional palpation method Measurements and Main ResultsThe primary outcome was the first-attempt success rate of arterial catheterizations. The skin-to-artery distance of the radial artery in the BMI groups of 40–49 and ≥ 50 kg/m2 was significantly greater than that of the BMI group of 30–39 kg·m-2, mean difference: 1.0 mm [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.4 – 1.7, p=0.0029] for BMI 40–49 vs. 30–39 kg/m2 and 1.5 mm (95% CI: 0.6 – 2.4, p=0.0015) for ≥ 50 vs. 30–39 kg·m-2. Similar findings were observed for the brachial artery. BMI was inversely associated with first-attempt success rates (p=0.0145) and positively with time to successful catheterization (p=0.0271). The first-attempt success and vascular complication rates of catheterization did not significantly differ between the ultrasound guidance group (65.0%; 52.5%) and the conventional palpation group (70.0%, p=0.6331; 57.5%, p=0.6531). ConclusionOur results do not support routine uses of ultrasonography during radial arterial catheterizations for obese adults when junior practitioners performed the procedure.

Bougie approach improves first-attempt success rate compared to stylet approach in patients with difficult airway needing endotracheal intubation: a meta-analysis.

Bougies and stylets are widely acknowledged as effective tools for managing endotracheal intubation, uncertainties persist regarding the comparative efficacy and safety of bougie versus stylet approaches in endotracheal intubation. A comprehensive electronic search was conducted on the Cochrane Library, PubMed, and Embase databases from inception to December 9, 2023, using the keywords "endotracheal intubation," "bougie," and "stylet." This meta-analysis aims to evaluate and compare the performance of bougies and stylets in patients undergoing endotracheal intubation. A total of 12 articles, encompassing 2534 participants, were included in this meta-analysis. The bougie approach did not exhibit superiority in first-attempt success rate (83.6% vs. 81.7%; OR, 1.06, 95% CI, 0.49 to 2.29; P=0.89) and total intubation success rate (99.3% vs. 97.6%; OR, 2.32, 95% CI, 0.44 to 12.34; P=0.32, I2>50%, P<0.001). However, in patients with difficult airways, the bougie approach demonstrated a superior first-attempt success rate compared to the stylet approach (93.8% vs. 76.4%; OR, 5.25, 95% CI, 2.74 to 10.05; P<0.001). There was no significant difference in complications between the bougie and stylet approaches (P>0.05). For patients with difficult airway characteristics, our recommendation is to perform endotracheal intubation (ETI) using the bougie approach over the stylet approach, as it has been associated with a better first-attempt success rate. Notably, the advantages of using a bougie may be less pronounced for patients without signs of a difficult airway.

Video laryngoscopy improves ProSeal™ laryngeal mask airway position by anesthesia residents: A randomized controlled, double-blind study

BackgroundThe insertion of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) using a blind digital technique is difficult for inexperienced performers and malpositioning of the device can impair ventilation and may lead to complications. AimThis study aimed to compare the proper ProSeal LMA position inserted by anesthesia residents between video laryngoscopy-assisted and blind digital insertion techniques. MethodsA total of 138 patients aged 18–80 years, ASA I and II undergoing elective surgery, were randomly allocated to the digital or video laryngoscopy-assisted group. Anesthesia residents performed ProSeal LMA insertion. The primary outcome was the proportion of a proper LMA position evaluated by a blinded assessor using the fiber-optic scores. Secondary outcomes included first attempt success rate, duration of insertion, incidence of desaturation during insertion, peak airway and oropharyngeal leak pressure, gastric tube placement difficulty, hemodynamic disturbance, and airway complications at 1 and 24 h after surgery. ResultsPatients in the video laryngoscopy group demonstrated a significantly higher proportion of proper LMA position than those in the digital group (53/68 [78 %] vs. 24/67 [36 %]; RR 2.18 [95%CI 1.54–3.07]; P < 0.001). Using the video laryngoscopy-guided insertion improved the fiber-optic scores by 7.11 folds (95%CI 3.53–14.32; P < 0.001) compared with the digital technique. Patients in the video laryngoscopy group showed higher sealing pressure, easier gastric tube placement, but longer insertion time. There was no significant difference in the peak airway pressure, first-attempt success rate, hemodynamic changes, and airway complications between groups. No desaturation occurred during the study. ConclusionUsing a Macintosh-shaped blade video laryngoscope facilitates novice anesthesiologists in achieving improved ProSeal LMA positioning without compromising airway or hemodynamic complications. The optimal ProSeal LMA position also provides a higher oropharyngeal sealing pressure and easier gastric tube placement.

Comparison of two different positions of an anaesthesiologist for ease of endotracheal intubation in adult patients: A randomised control trial

Background and aimsMaintaining the airway with a cuffed endotracheal tube (ETT) in the trachea remains one of the most essential anaesthesia skills. Many parameters were described to assess the difficulty of intubation in the preoperative period, but none allow the prediction of all difficult intubations. The correct posture of the anaesthesiologist is also an important factor for successful endotracheal intubation. The aim of this study was. This study aimed to compare the impact of two different positions of an anaesthesiologist (sitting vs. standing) at the time of endotracheal intubation. MethodsOne hundred ten American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status I/II patients, aged between 17 to 65 years, Mallampati grade I/II, mouth opening 39–70 mm, thyromental distance (TMD) 6–6.5 cm, and sternomental distance (SMD) >13 cm, scheduled for elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy, were recruited. Patients were divided into two groups; Group I consisted of patients who underwent endotracheal intubation by an anaesthesiologist in a sitting posture, while Group II encompassed patients who underwent endotracheal intubation by anaesthesiologists in a standing posture. Assessment parameters include ease of intubation (IDS score), intubation time, intubation success rate, number of attempts, grade of laryngoscopy (Cormack Lehane score, POGO score), and complications like tooth and soft tissue damage. ResultsThe ease of intubation was higher in group I, 1(0–1), than in group II, 1(1−2) (p = 0.02), and there was a significant difference between the two groups. The Cormack Lehane grade (CL) was I/IIa/IIb/III in 19/23/13/0 in group I and I/IIa/IIb/III in 13/21/18/3 in group II. The first-attempt intubation success rate for groups I and II was 94.54 % and 92.72 % respectively. ConclusionThe sitting posture of an anaesthesiologist at the time of laryngoscopy provides a better intubating condition when compared with the standing posture. RegistrationClinical Trial Registry - India (CTRI) CTRI/2023/03/050371.

First-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate using a hyperangulated unchannelled videolaryngoscope vs. a channelled videolaryngoscope in patients with anticipated difficult airway: a randomised controlled trial.

There is uncertainty about the optimal videolaryngoscope for awake tracheal intubation in patients with anticipated difficult airway. The use of channelled and unchannelled videolaryngoscopy has been reported, but there is a lack of evidence on which is the best option. We conducted a randomised clinical trial to compare the efficacy of the C-MAC D-Blade® vs. Airtraq® in adult patients (aged ≥ 18 y) scheduled for elective or emergency surgery under general anaesthesia with anticipated difficult airway who required awake tracheal intubation under local anaesthesia and conscious sedation. The primary endpoint was the first-attempt tracheal intubation success rate. Secondary outcomes included the overall success rate; number of tracheal intubation attempts; Cormack and Lehane glottic view; level of difficulty (visual analogue score); patient discomfort (visual analogue score); and incidence of complications. Ninety patients (70/90 male (78%); mean (SD) age 65 (12) y) with anticipated difficult airways were randomly allocated to C-MAC D-Blade or Airtraq videolaryngoscopy. First-attempt successful tracheal intubation rate was higher in patients allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with those allocated to the Airtraq group (38/45 (84%) vs. 28/45 (62%), respectively; p = 0.006). The proportion of patients' tracheas that were intubated at the second and third attempt was 4/45 (9%) and 3/45 (7%) in those allocated to the C-MAC D-Blade group compared with 14/45 (31%) and 1/45 (2%) in those allocated to the Airtraq group (p = 0.006). There was no significant difference in overall tracheal intubation success rate (C-MAC D-Blade group 45/45 (100%) vs. Airtraq group 43/45 (96%), p = 0.494). In patients with anticipated difficult airway, first-attempt awake tracheal intubation success rate was higher with the C-MAC D-Blade compared with Airtraq laryngoscopy. No difference was found between the two videolaryngoscopes in overall tracheal intubation success rate.