REVIEWS 759 opera, Monna Vanna. Orientalism crops up in Natalia Braguinskaia’s article on Igor´ Stravinskii’s Nightingale, just as it does in Irina Kotkina’s introduction to debates around Soviet opera in the 1930s. The Russian-themed articles are not solely confined to issues of nationalism, however. Louisa Martin-Chevalier looks at the revolutionary aspirations of the Proletarian music movement, Suzanna Kassian explores the life and work of Boris Asaf´ev, Tetiana ZolozovaLe Menestrel considers the absurd in Shostakovich’s Nose, and Anne Swartz examines how Russia’s embrace of the piano was facilitated by the court during the rule of Alexander I. Alongside these Russian topics, there are articles on the operas of the Serbian composer, Petar Konjović (by Jelena MilojkovićDjuri ć), a comparison by Anetta Floirat between Karol Szymanowski’s opera, King Roger, and its source text of Euripides’ Bacchae, and a survey by Vera Nilova of how early-twentieth-century Finnish composers drew on French music for inspiration. This motley baker’s dozen of articles is, like many edited collections, uneven in quality, and there is much here that will already be familiar to specialists, although in its diverse line-up of authors and topics, it nevertheless gives a useful snap-shot of current scholarly priorities in the field of Russian and Eastern European musicology. Wadham College, University of Oxford Philip Ross Bullock Danuser, Hermann, and Zimmermann, Heidy (eds). Avatar of Modernity: ‘The Rite of Spring’ Reconsidered. The Paul Sacher Foundation and Boosey & Hawkes, Basel and London, 2013. 501 pp. Illustrations. Music examples. Tables. Notes. Chronology. Bibliography. Index. £56.00. Levitz, Tamara (ed.). Stravinsky and His World. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ and Oxford, 2013. xvi + 368 pp. Illustrations. Music examples. Notes. Index. $35.00: £24.95 (paperback). For many historians of twentieth-century music, Stravinskii simply is the world, just as he stands, pars pro toto, for many of the most important manifestations of modernism and modernity. Well-travelled and equally wellconnected , his influence can be traced across movements and continents, and a vast body of critical and biographical literature has illuminated almost every aspect of his life and work. Readers might well wonder whether there is anything new to be said about the composer, yet on the basis of the two volumes under consideration here, it is clear that untapped sources of biographical information remain to be discovered, and that scholarship is capable of innovative and surprising gestures that reframe our understanding of an all-too-familiar figure. In this respect, Tamara Levitz’s Stravinsky and his World contains some of the most unexpected and engaging discoveries of SEER, 95, 4, OCTOBER 2017 760 the crop of books that appeared to mark the centenary of The Rite of Spring. Levitz’s own contribution to the volume is an essay — ‘Igor the Angeleno: The Mexican Connection’ — that explores Stravinskii’s visits to and connections with Latin America, as well as his early years in Los Angeles. Here, Levitz paints a picture of the composer’s exile that draws not on the tropes of loss and nostalgia that figure in the writings of, say, Edward Said or Joseph Brodsky, but on theories of cosmopolitanism advanced by A. Joan Saab and Homi Bhabha. Here, Stravinskii moves easily across cultural, linguistic and national borders with ease and entitlement (Levitz pointedly compares his situation to that of Jewish refugees from East Europe at the same time). His overstated sense of aristocratic entitlement and intense, if complex, need for friendship clearly enabled him to circulate in artistic circles around the world at this time. Levitz’s account of Stravinskii’s encounter with the glorious Victoria Ocampo is emblematic here, and her article draws pertinently on the composer’s photo album as a way of capturing an otherwise ineffable sense of his personality. Levitz’s article is followed by a series of documents (introduced by Leonora Saavedra and co-translated by Mariel Fiori) that trace his engagement with the Spanish-speaking world from 1921 to 1949. Given the long shadow that Richard Taruskin’s exploration of the composer’s Russian origins still casts over the field, or the equal and entirely logical emphasis on his Paris years, this turn to Spain...
Read full abstract