Final Efficacy Results Research Articles

Intranasal budesonide for rhinitis during a high airborne pollution period: a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAir pollution may induce or reinforce nasal inflammation regardless of allergy status. There is limited direct clinical evidence informing the treatment of airborne pollution-related rhinitis.ObjectiveTo assess the effectiveness of intranasal budesonide in adults with self-reported rhinitis symptoms triggered/worsened by airborne pollution.MethodsAdults in northern China with self-reported rhinitis symptoms triggered or worsened by airborne pollution were randomized to budesonide 256 µg/day or placebo for 10 days in pollution season (October 2019 to February 2020). The primary endpoint was the mean change from baseline in 24-h reflective total nasal symptom score (rTNSS) averaged over 10 days. The secondary endpoints were subject-assessed Global Impression of Change (SGIC), mean change from baseline in individual nasal symptom severity, and mean change from baseline in individual non-nasal symptoms of cough and postnasal drip severity. One-sided P < 0.0125 was considered statistically significant.ResultsAfter an interruption by COVID-19, an interim analysis showed that the study could be ended for efficacy with n = 206 participants (103/group) since the primary efficacy endpoint demonstrated significant results. The final efficacy results showed that the 10-day-averaged rTNSS change in the budesonide group was greater than with placebo (− 2.20 vs − 1.72, P = 0.0107). Budesonide also significantly improved 10-day-averaged itching/sneezing change (− 0.75 vs − 0.51, P = 0.0009). Results for SGIC and all other individual symptoms did not show significant differences between the two groups.ConclusionsIntranasal budesonide 256 µg once daily improved the total nasal symptoms and itching/sneezing over 10 days in adults with rhinitis triggered/worsened by airborne pollution.

A Phase 1 Trial of MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Combination with Ixazomib (MLN9708) for Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Final Results

A Phase 1 Trial of MEC (Mitoxantrone, Etoposide, Cytarabine) in Combination with Ixazomib (MLN9708) for Relapsed/ Refractory Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML): Final Results

Randomized phase II trial of radium-223 (RA) plus enzalutamide (EZ) versus EZ alone in metastatic castration-refractory prostate cancer (mCRPC): Final efficacy and safety results.

135 Background: We previously reported that treatment with EZ+RA was associated with a decline in serum bone metabolism markers (BMM), which correlated with improved outcomes compared to EZ alone (Agarwal N et al, Clinical Cancer Research, 2020, PMID 31937614). Here we report the final efficacy and safety results for this trial. Methods: In this phase 2 trial (NCT02199197), patients (pts) with progressive mCRPC were treated with EZ (160 mg daily) ±RA (standard dose of 55 kBq/kg IV Q4 weeks x 6), until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Primary objectives of change in bone markers and safety have been reported previously. Secondary objectives included comparison of PSA progression free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and long term safety in all pts receiving RA+EZ vs EZ alone. Post hoc analysis included comparison of PSA-PFS2 (defined as time from start of protocol therapy to PSA progression on subsequent therapy or death whichever occurred earlier), time to subsequent/next therapy (TTNT), and long term safety. Survival analysis and log-rank tests was performed using the R statistical package v.4.0.2 ( https://www.r-project.org ). Statistical significance was defined as P&lt;0.05. Results: Between 08/2014 and 11/2017, 47 pts were eligible and enrolled. Median follow up was 22 months (range 3.2-71.5). Thirty-five pts received RA+EZ and 12 pts received EZ alone. Receipt of prior abiraterone was allowed and was balanced between two groups: 60% in RA+EZ vs. 64% in EZ pts. Final efficacy results: TTNT, PSA-PFS2 were significantly improved in the RA+EZ pts over EZ alone pts, and all other efficacy parameters were numerically improved in RA+EZ pts (Table). Final safety results: none of the 12 EZ alone pts had any fracture; two of 35 RA+EZ pts were found to have incidental grade 1 asymptomatic fracture at the site of bone metastasis on routine imaging, at 15 and 31 months respectively after the last dose of RA, and did not require any intervention. No patients developed bone marrow disorders during the follow-up period. Efficacy and safety data will be elaborated during the meeting. Conclusions: In our study, EZ+RA resulted in significant long-term clinical benefit over EZ alone in pts with mCRPC without compromising safety. * NA&amp;BLM; equal contribution. Clinical trial information: NCT02199197. [Table: see text]

Final Efficacy Results of Neratinib in HER2-positive Hormone Receptor-positive Early-stage Breast Cancer From the Phase III ExteNET Trial

BackgroundThe ExteNET trial demonstrated improved invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) with neratinib, an irreversible pan-HER tyrosine kinase inhibitor, versus placebo in patients with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive (HER2+)/hormone receptor-positive (HR+) early-stage breast cancer (eBC). Patients and MethodsExteNET was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, phase III trial of 2840 patients with HER2+ eBC after neoadjuvant/adjuvant trastuzumab-based therapy. Patients were stratified by HR status and randomly assigned 1-year oral neratinib 240 mg/day or placebo. The primary endpoint was iDFS. Descriptive analyses were performed in patients with HR+ eBC who initiated treatment ≤ 1 year (HR+/≤ 1-year) and > 1 year (HR+/> 1-year) post-trastuzumab. ResultsHR+/≤ 1-year and HR+/> 1-year populations comprised 1334 (neratinib, n = 670; placebo, n = 664) and 297 (neratinib, n = 146; placebo, n = 151) patients, respectively. Absolute iDFS benefits at 5 years were 5.1% in HR+/≤ 1-year (hazard ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41-0.82) and 1.3% in HR+/>1-year (hazard ratio, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.29-1.84). In HR+/≤ 1-year, neratinib was associated with a numerical improvement in overall survival (OS) at 8 years (absolute benefit, 2.1%; hazard ratio, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.55-1.13). Of 354 patients in the HR+/≤ 1-year group who received neoadjuvant therapy, 295 had residual disease, and results showed absolute benefits of 7.4% at 5-year iDFS (hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.33-1.07) and 9.1% at 8-year OS (hazard ratio, 0.47; 95% CI, 0.23-0.92). There were fewer central nervous system events with neratinib. Adverse events were similar to those previously reported. ConclusionNeratinib significantly improved iDFS in the HER2+/HR+/≤ 1-year population, and a similar trend was observed in patients with residual disease following neoadjuvant treatment. Numerical improvements in central nervous system events and OS were consistent with iDFS benefits and suggest long-term benefit for neratinib in this population.

TOUCAN: A randomised phase II trial of carboplatin and gemcitabine +/- vandetanib in first line treatment of advanced urothelial cell cancer in patients who are not suitable to receive cisplatin.

448 Background: Whilst cisplatin combination therapy remains the standard of care for patients with advanced urothelial cancers, many patients are unsuitable for cisplatin and go on to receive carboplatin combination therapy. Although responses are frequent, overall outcomes remain poor, and there is a high unmet need for more effective first line treatment. Vandetanib is a well-tolerated, oral inhibitor of vascular and epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinases, both of which are implicated in the pathogenesis of urothelial cancers. Methods: Patients with metastatic or inoperable urothelial cancer who had no prior chemotherapy and were unsuitable for cisplatin were randomly allocated to receive carboplatin (AUC 4.5, day 1) plus gemcitabine (1000mg/m2, days 1 and 8) plus either vandetanib (100mg od, days 1-21) (GCV) or matching placebo (GCP) in 21-day cycles up to a total of 6 cycles. Treatment allocation was double-blind. There was a planned safety review after the first 40 patients had received at least one cycle. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Sample size (n=82) was calculated using a one-sided alpha of 0.2 and power 80% to detect a HR of 0.65 for PFS. We present the final efficacy results. The trial was coordinated by the Wales Cancer Trials Unit at Cardiff University and funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK/09/024) and AstraZeneca. Results: Of 82 patients, 40 received GCV. 62 (76%) had a bladder primary, and 56 (68%) had poor renal function. The arms were well balanced except for age &gt; 75 (13 (16%) GCV, 23 (28%) GCP). Median PFS was 8.5 months (m) (95% CI 6.0, 9.7) and 8.8 m (5.8, 9.0) for GCV and GCP respectively (adjusted hazard ratio (HR) 0.93 (0.50, 1.71), P=0.89). Overall survival was 10.8 m (8.0, 13.0) and 13.8 m (11.1, 16.6) for GCV and GCP respectively (adjusted HR 1.38 (0.77, 2.46), P=0.24). Response rates were 50% (n=20) and 55% (n=23) for GCV and GCP. All-grade adverse events were similar but there were significantly more grade 3+ events in the GCV arm. Conclusion: Vandetanib did not improve efficacy of chemotherapy but increased toxicity in advanced urothelial cancer not suitable for cisplatin. Clinical trial information: 68146831.

Cisplatin with or without rucaparib after preoperative chemotherapy in patients with triple negative breast cancer: Final efficacy results of Hoosier Oncology Group BRE09-146.

1082 Background: Patients (pts) with triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) with residual disease after neoadjuvant therapy have a high risk of recurrence. Methods: Pts with BRCA mutations and/or TNB...

Abstract PD2-2: Final efficacy results of the randomized phase III BEATRICE trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative early breast cancer

Abstract Background: In the metastatic and neoadjuvant settings, bevacizumab (BEV) significantly improves progression-free survival and pathologic complete response rates, respectively, when combined with chemotherapy (CT) for breast cancer. In contrast, accumulating phase III data in the adjuvant setting in both colon and breast cancers have not shown a benefit from the addition of 1 year of BEV to standard therapy. Primary efficacy results from the BEATRICE trial in early triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) showed no significant difference in invasive disease-free survival (IDFS; primary outcome measure) between adjuvant BEV and non-BEV regimens after events in 393 (15%) of the 2591 randomized patients (stratified hazard ratio 0.87 [95% CI 0.72–1.07]) [Cameron et al. Lancet Oncol 2013]. The low number of events at the prespecified primary analysis of BEATRICE, the largest prospective trial in patients with centrally confirmed early TNBC, suggested that the prognosis for patients with TNBC was better than previously thought. This observation, together with data from retrospective series suggesting that most recurrences occur within 3–5 years of TNBC diagnosis [Dent et al. 2007], makes longer follow-up important to fully understand outcomes in this patient population and the natural history of TNBC. We now report extended follow-up data from the prespecified overall survival (OS) analysis of BEATRICE. Methods: Eligible patients in the open-label randomized multinational phase III BEATRICE trial had centrally confirmed triple-negative and/or basal-like operable primary invasive breast cancer (pT1a-pT3). CT (anthracycline and/or taxane based) was selected by the investigator for each patient. After definitive surgery, patients were randomized 1:1 to receive ≥4 cycles of either CT alone or the same CT + 1 year of BEV (5 mg/kg/wk equivalent). Stratification factors were nodal status (0 vs 1-3 vs ≥4 involved nodes), selected CT backbone (anthracycline vs taxane vs both), hormone receptor status (negative vs low), and surgery (breast conserving vs mastectomy). Secondary outcome measures were OS, breast cancer-free interval, disease-free survival (DFS), distant DFS, and safety (NCI CTCAE v3.0). The prespecified final OS analysis will be performed approximately 52 months after randomization of the last patient into the study. Results: The planned clinical cut-off date is June 30, 2014, when the duration of follow-up will be 4.3–6.5 years in those who have not died or been lost to follow-up. OS (with at least 284 events; 11%), updated IDFS with longer follow-up, and long-term safety results will be analyzed and reported. Citation Format: Richard Bell, Julia Brown, Mahesh Parmar, Mark Toi, Thomas Suter, Guenther Steger, Xavier Pivot, John Mackey, Christian Jackisch, Rebecca Dent, Peter Hall, Almut Mecke, Leilani Morales, Louise Provencher, Elzbieta Staroslawska, Roberto Hegg, Laurence Vanlemmens, Andreas Kirsch, Andreas Schneeweiss, Norikazu Masuda, Friedrich Overkamp, David Cameron. Final efficacy results of the randomized phase III BEATRICE trial evaluating adjuvant bevacizumab-containing therapy in triple-negative early breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr PD2-2.

Abstract P4-12-08: Final efficacy results from a single-arm multicenter phase II study evaluating first-line trastuzumab, bevacizumab, and capecitabine (HAX) therapy for HER2-positive locally recurrent/metastatic breast cancer (LR/mBC)

Abstract Background: After median follow-up of 8.8 months, the primary efficacy results from the HAX study [Martín et al., Oncologist 2012] demonstrated a 73% overall response rate (ORR) according to RECIST (primary endpoint), median progression-free survival (PFS) of 14.4 months and a safety profile typical of the component agents; overall survival (OS) data were immature at that time. We present final efficacy results. Methods: Patients with measurable HER2-positive LR/mBC who had received no prior chemotherapy for LR/mBC received bevacizumab 15 mg/kg day 1, trastuzumab 6 mg/kg day 1 (8 mg/kg loading dose in cycle 1), and capecitabine 1000 mg/m2 bid days 1–14, repeated every 3 weeks until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. Results: At the time of data cut-off, median follow-up was 31.8 months (range 1.2–44.5 months). Median duration of study therapy was 9.0, 9.4, and 10.3 months for bevacizumab, capecitabine, and trastuzumab, respectively. More than 8 cycles were administered in 67%, 65%, and 70%, respectively. Efficacy results in the intent-to-treat population (n = 88) and clinically important subgroups are shown below. Patient subgroupBest ORR,% (95% CI)PFS events, n (%)Median PFS, months (95% CI)Deaths, n (%)Median OS, months (95% CI)1-year OS rate,% (95% CI)All patients (n = 88)75 (65-84)70 (80)14.2 (10.5-14.9)40 (45)31.8 (26.3-38.2)94 (86-98)ER and/or PgR positive (n = 37)73 (56-86)32 (86)14.1 (8.5-17.0)19 (51)31.8 (24.4-42.6)100 (*-*)ER and PgR negative (n = 51)77 (63-87)38 (75)14.5 (10.5-18.9)21 (41)33.1 (23.6-44.5)90 (77-96)No prior chemotherapy (n = 37)81 (65-92)27 (73)14.9 (10.5-24.8)14 (38)31.8 (26.3-44.4)94 (80-99)Prior chemotherapy (n = 51)71 (56-83)43 (84)13.6 (8.5-14.8)26 (51)30.9 (24.3-42.1)94 (82-98)Taxane pretreated (n = 28)57 (37-76)26 (93)9.5 (5.2-14.0)17 (61)27.4 (21.4-33.2)93 (74-98)Prior anti-HER2 therapy (n = 22)73 (50-89)18 (82)12.1 (5.2-17.0)11 (50)30.9 (24.3-*)95 (72-99)Age &amp;gt;60 years (n = 25)72 (51-88)16 (64)14.2 (10.5-21.7)11 (44)33.2 (22.0-*)100 (*-*)*Not reached The most common grade ≥3 adverse events were hand-foot syndrome (26% of patients), diarrhea (11%), and hypertension (11%). The majority of deaths (38/40) were from progressive/underlying disease. The cause of the two remaining deaths was described as unknown; one was reported at the primary analysis and the other occurred 19 months after last study drug administration, following progression. Detailed long-term safety results will be presented. Conclusion: Long-term follow-up results from the HAX study show that this is an active and tolerable first-line triplet therapy for HER2-positive mBC, demonstrating median OS of 31.8 months. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr P4-12-08.

Abstract S5-02: Veliparib/carboplatin plus standard neoadjuvant therapy for high-risk breast cancer: First efficacy results from the I-SPY 2 TRIAL

Abstract Background: I-SPY 2 is a multicenter, phase 2 screening trial using adaptive randomization within biomarker subtypes to evaluate a series of novel agents/combinations when added to standard neoadjuvant therapy (paclitaxel q wk x 12, doxorubicin &amp; cyclophosphamide q 2-3 wk x 4, T/AC) vs. T/AC (control arm) for women with high-risk stage II/III breast cancer. The primary endpoint is pathologic complete response (pCR) at surgery. Our goal is to identify/graduate regimens that have ≥85% Bayesian predictive probability of success (statistical significance) in a 300-patient biomarker-linked Phase 3 neoadjuvant trial. Experimental regimens can “graduate” in at least 1 of 10 possible signatures defined by hormone-receptor (HR) &amp; HER2 status &amp; MammaPrint (MP), with a maximum number of 120 total patients enrolled. We report final efficacy results of the oral PARP inhibitor veliparib (V, ABT-888) in combination with carboplatin (carbo), 1 of 7 experimental regimens evaluated in the trial to date. Methods: Women with tumors ≥2.5 cm by clinical exam and ≥2 cm by imaging are eligible for screening. Tumors that are MP low/HR+/HER2- are ineligible for randomization. MRI scans (baseline, 3 weeks after start of therapy, at completion of weekly T, and prior to surgery) were used in a longitudinal statistical model to improve the efficiency of adaptive randomization. V+carbo was assigned to HER2- tumors only, which limits its possible signatures to: all HER2-, HR+/HER2-, HR-/HER2-. For these 3 signatures we provide estimated pCR rates with associated 95% Bayesian probability intervals for V+carbo and concurrently randomized controls. Analysis is intent to treat with patients who switched to non-protocol therapy regarded as non-pCRs. For each signature we provide probabilities of superiority for V+carbo over control and Bayesian predictive probabilities of success in a neoadjuvant Phase 3 trial equally randomized between V+carbo and control. Results: When V+carbo met the 85% predictive probability criterion in HR-/HER2- and all HER2-, this regimen graduated and accrual to V+carbo was stopped. V+carbo was assigned to 72 patients, and there were 62 concurrently randomized controls (44 HER2- controls). The following table shows final results based on available pCR information. Two patients assigned to V+carbo withdrew consent during treatment and are not included in the table. SignatureEstimated pCR Rate (95% probability interval)Probability V+Carbo is Superior to ControlPredictive Probability of Success in Phase 3 V+CarboControl All HER2-35% (25-45%)20% (9-33%)97%71%HR+/HER2-14% (5-27%)15% (5-30%)44%16%HR-/HER2-52 (38-67%)24% (9-43%)99%92% Conclusion: Adaptive randomization successfully identified a biomarker signature for V+carbo on the basis of a modest number of patients. V+carbo has graduated with a triple-negative (TN) breast cancer signature, and is the subset recommended for this regimen's subsequent development. There is a suggestion that HR+/HER2- tumors benefit little from this regimen and inclusion of tumors in this subset would therefore dilute its effect in a subsequent trial. Analyses are currently underway to define additional biomarkers that may be predictive of response. The I-SPY 2 standing trial mechanism efficiently evaluates agents/combinations in biomarker-defined patient subsets, with future agents/combinations reported as available. Citation Information: Cancer Res 2013;73(24 Suppl): Abstract nr S5-02.

Comprehensive biomarker analysis and final efficacy results of sorafenib in the BATTLE trial.

To report the clinical efficacy of sorafenib and to evaluate biomarkers associated with sorafenib clinical benefit in the BATTLE (Biomarker-Integrated Approaches of Targeted Therapy for Lung Cancer Elimination) program. Patients with previously treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) received sorafenib until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Eight-week disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were assessed. Prespecified biomarkers included K-RAS, EGFR, and B-RAF mutations, and EGFR gene copy number. Gene expression profiles from NSCLC cell lines and patient tumor biopsies with wild-type EGFR were used to develop a sorafenib sensitivity signature (SSS). A total of 105 patients were eligible and randomized to receive sorafenib. Among 98 patients evaluable for eight-week DCR, the observed DCR was 58.2%. The median PFS and OS were 2.83 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.04-3.58] and 8.48 months (95% CI, 5.78-10.97), respectively. Eight-week DCR was higher in patients with wild-type EGFR than patients with EGFR mutation (P = 0.012), and in patients with EGFR gene copy number gain (FISH-positive) versus patients FISH-negative (P = 0.048). In wild-type EGFR tumors, the SSS was associated with improved PFS (median PFS 3.61 months in high SSS vs. 1.84 months in low SSS; P = 0.026) but not with eight-week DCR. Increased expression of fibroblast growth factor-1, NF-κB, and hypoxia pathways were identified potential drivers of sorafenib resistance. Sorafenib demonstrates clinical activity in NSCLC, especially with wild-type EGFR. SSS was associated with improved PFS. These data identify subgroups that may derive clinical benefit from sorafenib and merit investigation in future trials.

Final efficacy results of NCIC CTG IND.202: A randomized phase II study of recombinant interleukin-21 (rIL21) in patients with recurrent or metastatic melanoma (MM).

9032 Background: rIL21 is a T-cell derived cytokine with antitumor activity dependent on NK cells or CD8+ T cells through induction of central and effector memory cells. A previous phase II study demonstrated an ORR of 22.5% in previously untreated patients with MM. We conducted a multicentre randomized phase II study of MM evaluating the efficacy, toxicity, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity, and biomarkers of rIL21 versus dacarbazine (DTIC). Methods: Eligible patients: Recurrent or MM, with either maximum tumour lesion size of &lt; 50 mm or LDH &lt; 2.5 x ULN and prior therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors allowed. Patients were treated with either rIL-21, 30 µg /kg/day dose IV daily x 5 days weeks 1, 3, 5 q 8 weeks or dacarbazine (DTIC) 1000 mg/m2 IV q 3 weeks. The primary objective was to compare progression free survival (PFS). The trial was designed to detect a hazard ratio of 1.75 with one-sided alpha of 0.1; 58 progression events were required to provide 80% power. Results: 64 patients were randomized, 32 in the rIL-21 arm and 32 in the DTIC arm. The Table summarizes key demographic and efficacy endpoints. Common rIl21 related adverse events were fatigue, rash, diarrhea, nausea, myalgia and elevated liver enzymes. At least one dose reduction/ interruption or discontinuation occurred in 32 (100%) and 27 (96.4%) of rIL21 and DTIC patients. Conclusions: Despite encouraging efficacy in prior phase I/II studies, the results suggest that rIL-21 is comparable to DTIC in this patient population. Additional biomarker analysis from this study is pending and combination studies are currently ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT00514085. [Table: see text]

Durable Complete Responses Following Therapy with Epratuzumab Plus Rituximab: Final Efficacy Results of a Multicenter Study in Recurrent Indolent Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma (NHL).

BACKGROUND: Epratuzumab, an anti-CD22 humanized monoclonal antibody, has shown clinical activity as a single-agent (Leonard et al, J Clin Oncol. 2003; 21:3051–3059) and in combination with rituximab in relapsed/refractory B-cell NHL (Leonard et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005; 23:5044–5051). To evaluate this combination regimen in a larger cohort of patients and to evaluate long-term efficacy, we conducted an international multicenter, open-label, single-arm study in patients with recurrent indolent NHL.METHODS: Forty-nine patients (23F/26M, median age: 61, elevated LDH: 25%, bone marrow involvement: 49%) with chemotherapy-relapsed or refractory follicular NHL (n=41) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (n=7) (as well as one enrolled patient with histological evidence of follicular and diffuse large B-cell lymphoma) were evaluated. Thirty-five (71%) were rituximab-naive, with the remainder having previously received and responded to then relapsed from rituximab (single agent or with chemotherapy). Patients received 360 mg/m2 IV of epratuzumab, followed by 375 mg/m2 IV of rituximab, weekly for 4 consecutive weeks.RESULTS: As preliminarily reported (Emmanouilides et al, Blood 2003; 102/11:69a), the combination therapy was well tolerated, without notable additive toxicity over that expected with single-agent rituximab. Twenty-two of the 41 (54%, 95% CI: 37% – 69%) follicular NHL (FL) patients achieved an objective response (OR) using IWG response criteria, including 10 (24%) patients with complete responses (CR), half of whom remained in remission at the last evaluation with a median duration of follow-up of 44.3 months (range: 18.2 – 52.4 months). The median duration of response (DR) was 13.4 months (95% CI: 8.4 – 28.2 months) and the median progression-free survival (PFS) was 10.2 months (95% CI: 6.3 – 13.6 months), with a Kaplan-Meier estimated median DR of 33.4 months (range: 11.2 – 47.9 months) and an estimated median PFS of 35.1 months (range: 12.9 – 52.4 months) for the 10 patients who achieved CR. Importantly, 4/7 SLL patients (57%) experienced OR, including 2 CR, 1 CRu and 1 PR. Furthermore, while the rituximab-naive FL and SLL patients (n=34) showed an OR of 50% (26% CR/CRu, 24% PR), those patients who had responded to prior rituximab (n=14) had an OR of 64% (29% CR, 36% PR).CONCLUSIONS: Overall, this study confirms that the combination of epratuzumab and rituximab, in addition to being well tolerated, demonstrates promising anti-lymphoma activity for indolent NHL, and can result in durable complete remissions in a subset of patients. Further evaluation of this combination regimen as initial therapy for indolent NHL is planned (CALGB 50701), and in diffuse large B cell lymphoma (CHOP + epratuzumab + rituximab) is ongoing (NCCTG N0489).

Peri-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM): Final efficacy results of the EPOC Intergroup randomized phase III study (EORTC 40983)

Peri-operative FOLFOX4 chemotherapy and surgery for resectable liver metastases from colorectal cancer (CRLM): Final efficacy results of the EPOC Intergroup randomized phase III study (EORTC 40983)

Final efficacy results of a phase I/II trial of ixabepilone in combination with capecitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC) previously treated with a taxane and an anthracycline

10511 Background: Ixabepilone is an epothilone B analog that has demonstrated efficacy in taxane-sensitive and taxane-resistant MBC. Differing mechanisms of action and minimally overlapping toxicities provide the potential for synergy between ixabepilone and other cytotoxics. Methods: This open-label Phase I/II study was conducted to determine the recommended Phase II (and III) doses of ixabepilone and capecitabine using a 3-hour infusion of ixabepilone given on Day 1 (Schedule A) or a 1-hour infusion of ixabepilone given for 3 consecutive days (Schedule B) in combination with capecitabine given orally on Days 1–14 every 21 days in patients (pts) with MBC previously treated with a taxane and an anthracycline in the adjuvant or metastatic setting. Pts were excluded if they had received &gt;3 prior chemotherapy regimens in the metastatic setting. Tumor response was determined after every 2 cycles. Results from the 62 patients treated with ixabepilone 40 mg/m2 as a 3 hr-infusion and capecitabine 2000 mg/m2 are shown here. Results: 56/62 patients (90%) were aged &lt;65 yrs. 80% of pts had visceral disease and 44% were ER/PR/HER-2 negative. 44% of pts had received ≥2 prior chemotherapies in the metastatic setting. Pts received a median of 4 cycles (range 1–20). The overall response rate was 30% (15/50; 95% CI = 17.9–44.6%) comprised of one (2%) complete response and 14 (28%) partial responses. All 15 of the responders had extensive tumor metastases at baseline. Four of the 15 responders were triple negative for ER/PR/HER-2. The median time to response was 6 weeks (range 5–14 weeks), with most responders achieving an objective response by the end of Cycle 2. The median duration of response was 6.9 months (95% CI = 4.3–9.7 months). Conclusions: The recommended Phase II (and III) doses were 40 mg/m2 ixabepilone (3-hour infusion on Day 1 every 21 days) and 2000 mg/m2 capecitabine (2 doses on Days 1–14 every 21 days). This ixabepilone/capecitabine combination demonstrated promising synergistic antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in pts with MBC previously treated with a taxane and an anthracycline. [Table: see text]

Data Management for an Efficacy Trial of a Vaccine in the Gambia

An individually randomised double-blind trial of PRP-T Hib conjugate vaccine was conducted in the Gambia between 1993 and 1995, in which 42,848 children were randomised into one of 10 groups, five corresponding to vaccine and five to placebo. Basic demographic data were collected on all children, and administration details of all doses of EPI vaccines were recorded. In addition, details on all doses of vaccines were recorded on each child's home-based health card; 2,681 episodes of possible Hib disease were investigated and for each episode detailed clinical data were collected. These investigations yielded 50 cases of confirmed Hib disease, which formed the basis of the final efficacy results. In all 50 cases, the data on the children's health card, describing the doses of study vaccine received exactly, matched the vaccination database which was filled with data returned from the clinics. The data-management procedures are described in detail in this paper.