Metal hexacyanometallates (MHCMs) form a large family of coordination network compounds [1]. They have variable and tunable physical and chemical properties due to the three-dimensional framework of alternating metal knots connected by a non-innocent small bridging ligand forming interconnected channels that can accommodate solvent molecules and counter ions. Therefore, these materials have been comprehensively studied in several different fields, including, functional materials for charge storage, electrocatalysis, electrochromic devices or light harvesting. For the mentioned applications, conductivity is critical, to which i) electronic conductivity by electrons or holes [2], ii) ionic conductivity by mobile alkali ions in the channels of the MHCMs [3], and iii) proton conductivity [4] may contribute. In larger scale for real application, the conductivity depends not only on intrinsic material properties but also on the morphology. Morphology (particularly grain boundaries) plays an important role in determining the pathway of charge carrier transport (electrons and holes) in the film. From first principles it is expected that continuous compact crystalline films will have better electrical conductivity.Here, we present results on copper hexacyanoferrate which demonstrate particularly well the variation of film morphology and its influence on conductivity as a key functional property. We succeeded in devising a simple method for preparation of metal hexacyanoferrates as a thin continuous film by a combination of sonication-assisted casting and vapor-assisted conversion, without the need for surface pre-treatment. This is especially helpful for coating substrates composed of different materials. Films obtained in this way show conductivities higher than that of powder pellets with equivalent crystal structure. Temperature-dependent and humidity-dependent measurements on powder pellets revealed the activation energies for charge transport as well as the role of zeolitic water in facilitating the charge transfer. 1. Paolella, A.; Faure, C.; Timoshevskii, V.; Marras, S.; Bertoni, G.; Guerfi, A.; Vijh, A.; Armand, M.; Zaghib, K. A Review on Hexacyanoferrate-based Materials for Energy Storage and Smart Windows: Challenges and Perspectives. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 18919–18932.2. Behera, J. N.; D’Alessandro, D. M.; Soheilnia, N.; Long, J. R. Synthesis and Characterization of Ruthenium and Iron−Ruthenium Prussian Blue Analogues. Mater. 2009, 21, 1922–1926.3. Ishizaki, M.; Ando, H.; Yamada, N.; Tsumoto, K.; Ono, K.; Sutoh, H.; Nakamura, T.; Nakao, Y.; Kurihara, M. Redox-Coupled Alkali-Metal Ion Transport Mechanism in Binder-Free Films of Prussian Blue Nanoparticles. Mater. Chem. A 2019, 7, 4777–4787.4. Ohkoshi, S.-I.; Nakagawa, K.; Tomono, K.; Imoto, K.; Tsunobuchi, Y.; Tokoro, H. High Proton Conductivity in Prussian Blue Analogues and the Interference Effect by Magnetic Ordering. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 6620–6621.