Appetites and Anxieties: Food, Film, and the Politics of Representation Cynthia Baron, Diane Carson and Mark Bernard. Detroit: Wayne State University Press, 2014.In Appetites and Anxieties: Food, Film, and the Politics of Representation, authors Baron, Carson, and Bernard draw together ideas from film studies, food studies, and anthropology to illuminate the meanings and implications behind portrayals of food in film. They argue that while fictional films' uses of food serve to illustrate characters' relationships, problems, and identities, documentary films dealing with food reveal larger issues such as cultural anxieties and problems surrounding a society's relationships with nature and the environment. Using a foodways analysis, which considers every aspect of food in culture from procurement through presentation, consumption, and cleanup, to disposal of leftovers, can greatly enhance our understanding of the political meanings of food in a society. Applying a foodways analysis to film studies can also, according to the authors, reveal distasteful elements of the food process which are usually kept hidden from members of a consumer society. This concealment is important because it limits the alternatives presented to film audiences, in an attempt to keep them focused on the ease and pleasure and identity-expressing aspects of food consumption, to alleviate consumer anxiety, and to enhance corporate profits. The numerous negative effects of presenting only the attractive parts of the food/feeding process include continued ignorance on the part of the audience to conditions faced by low-power workers in the food industry, the mistreatment and unsafe processing of animals destined to become food, the immense environmental toll extracted by input-heavy agricultural practices, and a lack of awareness that healthier and more sustainable alternatives exist. The authors of Appetites and Anxieties show the film industry's collusion with the food industry in protecting the profits of both. Because the food industry is so immense, it is in a position to offer or withhold lucrative promotional partnerships which can make or break the distribution and earnings chances of films. The size of the food industry also gives it great lobbying power, allowing it to push through seemingly ludicrous legislation such as the veggie libel law and the Animal Enterprise Terrorist Act, neither of which has been successful in gaining monetary awards for the food industry, but both of which have had a chilling effect on the film industry, (and others') willingness to expose portions of the food industry which the food industry would rather keep hidden. …
Read full abstract