In 1971 and 1973, Drs Strauss and Zaret published the seminal descriptions of stress radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging and of ECG-gated blood pool imaging, marking the beginning of what we know now as nuclear cardiology. In the later years (1975-1980), radionuclide cardiac imaging emerged as a distinct entity within the field of nuclear medicine. The publication by Dr Gould on pharmacologic stress perfusion imaging was also pivotal for the development of this field. Of relevance for later developments, it was predominantly cardiologists who investigated and introduced the use of nuclear medicine techniques for clinical imaging of the heart. At the national meetings of the American College of Cardiology (ACC) and the American Heart Association (AHA), an increasing number of scientific sessions were devoted to clinical applications of radionuclide cardiac imaging. However, the daylong symposium on cardiovascular imaging at the annual meeting of the Society of Nuclear Medicine (SNM) became the most important annual educational and scientific event for those involved in nuclear cardiac imaging. The increasing interest in Nuclear Cardiology led to the formation of the Cardiovascular (CV) Council of the SNM on November 12, 1985. Dr Elias Botvinick was the founder and the first president, who was joined by a small core group of mainly cardiologists. Subsequent presidents were all prominent investigators in the field of nuclear cardiology, and many of them were cardiologists (Table 1). With 1,012 members, the CV Council became the most dynamic and largest council of the SNM. Thirty-six percent of the members were nuclear physicians, 32% cardiologists, 22% technologists, and 10% representatives of industry. Nevertheless, cardiologists were the predominant forces within the CV Council with regard to educational and research activities. After several years of very successful and wellattended cardiovascular imaging symposia, many cardiac imaging investigators felt that nuclear cardiology should expand as a field on its own and become more widely inclusive to those physicians who were becoming interested in this area of medicine. Early attempts to develop this concept within the SNM were not very successful. The leadership of the SNM exercised their official power to limit the operation of the CV Council as a mainly educational activity for its own nuclear medicine community and obviously had no desire to initiate a separate and potentially independent professional society within its own ranks. To many of the members of the CV Council, it became increasingly clear that a more effective and likely independent representation might be needed to advance the field. It was also recognized that such an effort should include clear guidelines for clinical training and practice that would lead to more consistent quality of nuclear cardiology services. The lack of such standards and the perception that there was wide variation in the field of nuclear cardiology practice was felt to significantly harm its credibility.
Read full abstract