Six beams reinforced with HRB600 bars and one reinforced with HRB400 bars fabricated using steel fiber-reinforced lightweight aggregate concrete (SFLWAC) were tested under a four-point bending load to investigate the load-carrying capacity and service performance, with different reinforcement ratios, clear span lengths, concrete strengths, and reinforcement strengths. The test results showed that cracks ran through lightweight aggregates and developed rapidly without an aggregate interlocking mechanism, and the specimens eventually failed in the mode that the compressive concrete was crushed following longitudinal bars yielded, with 3 ∼ 4 major cracks. The specimens satisfied the allowable deflection and crack width required in the codes, with a ductility coefficient exceeding 4.5, and 1/150 of the span length was recommended to be the maximum deflection at the serviceability limit state. Generally, the increasing reinforcement ratio significantly improved the flexural strength and serviceability but reduced the ductility, the linear stiffness decreased with the growing span length, and the SFLWAC strength mainly affected the cracking moment and ductility. Replacing HRB400 bars with equal strength of HRB600 bars led to a substantial drop in serviceability, while an equal area of HRB600 bars improved the ultimate moment by 38.7 %. The calculation results indicated that by neglecting the residual tensile strength, fracture characteristics, and bond properties of SFLWAC, the prediction equations in the Chinese, American, and European codes underestimated the ultimate moment and overestimated the crack width, and the Chinese code yielded the conservative deflection prediction. The analytical flexural models for HRB600-reinforced SFLWAC beams were derived by incorporating the effects of steel fibers, lightweight aggregate concrete, and bond stress, exhibiting accurate predictions.