FFF Beams Research Articles

Response characterization of radiochromic OC-1 films in photon, electron, and proton beams.

Radiochromic film (RCF) dosimeters with their high spatial resolution and tissue equivalent properties are conveniently used for two-dimensional and small-field dosimetry. OC-1 is a new model of RCF dosimeter that was commercially introduced recently. Due to its novelty there is a need to characterize its response in various radiation beam types. To study the response of OC-1 RCFs to megavoltage clinical x-ray, electron, and proton beams, as well as kilovoltage x-ray beams used in a small animal research irradiator. OC-1 RCFs were cut into ∼4×4 cm2 pieces. RCF samples were irradiated at various dose levels in the range 0.5-120Gy using different modalities; a small animal radiation research platform (SARRP) (220 kVp), a medical linear accelerator (6 MV, 10 MV, 15 MV, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV FFF photon beams, as well as 6 and 20 MeV electron beams), and a gantry-mounted proton therapy synchrocyclotron. In order to study any dependency on the fractionation scheme, same dose was delivered at several fractions to a set of films. Different dose rates in the range 200-600 MU/min were delivered to a set of films to investigate any dose rate dependency. The films were scanned pre-irradiation and at 48h post-irradiation using a flatbed scanner. The net optical density (OD) was measured for red, green, and blue color channel for each film. The orientation dependency was studied by scanning the films at eight different orientations. In order to study the temporal evolution of the response of the films, film samples were irradiated at 10 and 50Gy using 6 MV photon beams and were scanned upon irradiation at certain time intervals up to 3 months. The spectral response of the films were studied over the visible range using a spectrometer. For megavoltage photon, electron, and plateau region of the proton beams, we did not observe a significant dependency on the beam quality, dose rate, and fractionation scheme. At the kV beam, an unusual over-response was observed in the films' net OD. An orientation dependency in the response of the films with a sinusoidal trend was observed. The response of the films increased with time following a double or triple exponential trend. The spectral absorption peaks were blue-shifted with dose. OC-1 RCFs were found to be reliable dosimeters with no significant energy dependency in MV range for photon and electron beams including the FFF beams. They over-respond when irradiated bykV x-ray beams compared to MV x-ray beams. Caution must be exercised to maintain the orientation of the films when scanning. Due to the temporal growth in the net OD of the films, same post-irradiation time interval must be used for scanning the calibration and test films.

Stereotactic body radiation therapy for prostate cancer: a dosimetric comparison of IMRT and VMAT using flattening filter and flattening filter-free beams.

This retrospective study was performed to evaluate plan quality and treatment delivery parameters of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for prostate cancer. The study utilized different isocentric modulated techniques: intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) using 6 MV flattening filter (FF) and 10 MV flattening filter-free beams (FFF). Fifteen retrospective prostate cancer patients were selected for this study. Sixty plans were created with an SBRT-prescribed dose of 36.25Gy delivered in five fractions. Planning target volume (PTV) coverage, plan quality indices, doses delivered to organs at risk (OARs), and treatment delivery parameters were compared for all plans. It turned out that VMAT plans, particularly those using the FFF beam, provided superior target conformality and a steeper dose gradient as compared to IMRT plans. Additionally, VMAT plans showed better OARs sparing compared to IMRT plans. However, IMRT plans delivered a lower maximum dose to the target than VMAT plans. Importantly, the VMAT plans resulted in reduced treatment delivery parameters, including beam on time (BOT), monitor unit (MU), and modulation factor (MF), compared to IMRT plans. Furthermore, a statistically significant difference was observed in BOT and mean body dose between FF and FFF beams, with FFF beams showing superior performance. Considering all results, VMAT using 10 MV (FFF) is suggested for treating prostate cancer patients with SBRT. This offers the fastest delivery in addition to maintaining the highest plan quality.

Assessing focal spot alignment in clinical linear accelerators: a comprehensive evaluation with triplet phantoms.

A fundamental parameter to evaluate the beam delivery precision and stability on a clinical linear accelerator (linac) is the focal spot position (FSP) measured relative to the collimator axis of the radiation head. The aims of this work were to evaluate comprehensive data on FSP acquired on linacs in clinical use and to establish the ability of alternative phantoms to detect effects on patient plan delivery related to FSP. FSP measurements were conducted using a rigid phantom holding two ball-bearings at two different distances from the radiation source. Images of these ball-bearings were acquired using the electronic portal imaging device (EPID) integrated with each linac. Machine QA was assessed using a radiation head-mounted PTW STARCHECK phantom. Patient plan QA was investigated using the SNC ArcCHECK phantom positioned on the treatment couch, irradiated with VMAT plans across a complete 360° gantry rotation and three X-ray energies. This study covered eight Elekta linacs, including those with 6 MV, 18 MV, and 6 MV flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams. The largest range in the FSP was found for 6 MV FFF. The FSP of one linac, retrofitted with 6 MV FFF, displayed substantial differences in FSP compared to 6 MV FFF beams on other linacs, which all had FSP ranges less than 0.50mm and 0.25mm in the lateral and longitudinal directions, respectively. The PTW STARCHECK phantom proved effective in characterising the FSP, while the SNC ArcCHECK measurements could not discern FSP-related features. Minor variations in FSP may be attributed to adjustments in linac parameters, component replacements necessary for beam delivery, and the wear and tear of various linac components, including the magnetron and gun filament. Consideration should be given to the ability of any particular phantom to detect a subsequent impact on the accuracy of patient plan delivery.

Accuracy of Beamscan Software in Determining the Inflection Point from the FFF Beam Profile Using Several Array Detectors.

The goal of this study is to determine the accuracy of the PTW Beamscan program in determining the inflection point from Flattening Filter Free Beam Profile utilizing Multiple Detectors. True Beam Linear Accelerator with 6FFF and 10FFF Photon Energies and 10 cm, 15 cm and 20 cm Field Sizes were used for this study. Profile measurements were taken with PTW's 729, 1,500, and 1,600 and the Starcheck system, the Pinpoint 3D with Beamscan system, and Linac's EPID. The first-order derivative was utilized in both the Excel spreadsheet and Beamscan software to analyse raw measured data to locate inflection point and the FWHM was calculated. The accuracy of inflection points and FWHM between the Excel sheet calculation and the software program were investigated. For 10X10 cm2 in the 729 Array, the greatest differences in FWHM were 5.16 mm and 5.04 mm for the X6 FFF and X10 FFF Energies, respectively. The largest difference was 2.26 mm for 1,600 SRS arrays with a 15×15 cm2 field size. The difference in FWHM between Manual and software analysis for 10X10 cm2 and 20X20 cm2 Field Sizes is in decreasing order for detectors from 729, 1,500, 1,600 SRS, Starcheck, Pinpoint 3D, and EPID. In contrast, there is no climbing or declining pattern detected in the difference in Field Width for the 15×15 cm2 Field Size. Similarly, for all detectors except the 1,600 SRS array, the peak of the first-order derivative occurs at the chamber position for a 15X15 cm2 field size. The higher resolution of measurement yields more accuracy in inflection point and the FWHM. Irrespective of measurement resolution, the Beamscan software provided the FWHM closer to the respective nominal Field Size. Out of all detectors, results obtained with Excel Starcheck and EPID are good in agreement with values obtained by the software analysis. Thus, it is shown that Beamscan software is so accurate in determining inflection point of a FFF beam profile and used for routine profile analysis.

Dosimetric Validation of Treatment Planning System for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Using AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline 5.b.

To assess the precision of dose calculations for Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy (VMAT) using megavoltage (MV) photon beams, we validated the accuracy of two algorithms: AUROS XB and Analytical Anisotropic Algorithm (AAA). This validation will encompass both flattening filter (FF) and flattening filter-free beam (FFF) modes, using AAPM Medical Physics Practice Guideline (MPPG 5b). VMAT validation tests were generated for 6 MV FF and 6 MV FFF beams using the AAA and AXB algorithms in the Eclipse V.15.1 treatment planning system (TPS). Corresponding measurements were performed on a linear accelerator using a diode detector and a radiation field analyzer. Point dose (PD) and in-vivo measurements were conducted using an A1SL ion chamber and (TLD) from Thermofisher, respectively. The Rando Phantom was employed for end-to-end (E2E) tests. The mean difference (MD) between the TPS-calculated values and the measured values for the PDD and output factors were within 1% and 0.5%, respectively, for both 6 MV FF and 6 MV FFF. In the TG 119 sets, the MD for PD with both AAA and AXB was <0.9%. For the TG 244 sets, the minimum, maximum, and mean deviations in PD for both 6 MV FF and 6 MV FFF beams were 0.3%, 1.4% and 0.8% respectively. In the E2E test, using the Rando Phantom, the MD between the TLD dose and the TPS dose was within 0.08% for both 6 MV FF (p=1.0) and 6 MV FFF (0.018) beams. The accuracy of the TPS and its algorithms (AAA and AXB) has been successfully validated. The recommended tests included in the VMAT/IMRT validation section proved invaluable for verifying the PDD, output factors, and the feasibility of complex clinical cases. E2E tests were instrumental in validating the entire workflow from CT simulation to treatment delivery.

The Impact of Dose Rate on the Tumor Microenvironment Using Flattening-filter-free Beams

AimsRecently, dose delivery technology has rapidly evolved with flattening filter-free beams (FFF), and the biological effects of high dose rates are a matter of interest. We hypothesized that FFF beams at different dose rates obtained with modern linear accelerators have different effects on the TME. Materials and methodsThe B16–F10 melanoma syngeneic tumor model was established, and mice were randomized to 2 different doses (2 Gy and 10 Gy) and 3 different dose rates (1 Gy/min, 6 Gy/min, and 14 Gy/min) along with the control group. Euthanasia was performed on the seventh day after RT, and intracardiac blood was collected for a comet assay. Tumors were harvested and examined histomorphologically and immunohistochemically. Statistical analyses were performed using SPSS software version 23 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). ResultsThe daily growth rate was uniform, and no difference was observed between tumor volumes across all three dose rates for each dose. Deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) damage in blood mononuclear cells was not affected by dose or dose rate. In the TME histomorphological examination, the number of mitosis is less in the 10 Gy arm, whereas the pleomorphism score was greater. Nevertheless, varying dose rates had no effect on the number of mitosis or the pleomorphism score. The severity of the inflammation, cell densities in the TME, and expression of immunohistochemical markers were comparable across all doses and dose rates. ConclusionIn our study involving the B16–F10 syngeneic tumor model, varying dose rates obtained with FFF beams had no effect on tumor volume, blood mononuclear cell DNA damage, or TME parameters. However, in order to fully understand the biological impacts of novel techniques, our study should be validated with alternative preclinical setups.

Multicentric characterisation of lateral beam profiles generated by 6FFF beam of three 0.35 T MR-linac systems

BackgroundThe physical characterisation of FFF-beam profiles in the presence of a magnetic field requires a new standardization procedure and formulation. PurposeThe aim of this multicentric experience is to propose new normalisation factors to allow for the calculation of standard parameters typical of flattened beams, such as dosimetric field size and penumbra, for a 6 MV FFF beam from an MR-linac. MethodsThe measurements were carried out on three ViewRay-MRIdiansystems. An equal set of measurements was acquired using the same equipment. Transverse beam profiles were acquired at seven different depthsand for six beam dimensions.The inflection point was estimated as the position of the maximum of a Gaussian fit obtained from the first derivative of the profiles. The position of the minimum and maximum points of the second derivative of the above Gaussian described the fall-off region, and the external peaks of the third derivative were considered as the in-field and out-field points. The profile normalisation was determined by imposing a 55% dose level at the inflection point and the renormalisation factors were calculated. ResultsThe position of the inflection point, and the second and third derivatives peaks were analysed,and the renormalisation factors as a function of field size and depth were determined. The values of the unflatness and the slope have been calculated for different depths and field sizes. ConclusionThis study represents the first multi-centric evaluation of the profiles on different low-field MR-Linac systems and theset of renormalisation parameters to analyse the FFF-beam on that system was effectively proposed.

Optimization of a commercial portal dose image prediction algorithm for pre-treatment verifications of plans using unflattened photon beams.

The aim was to improve the portal dosimetry-based quality assurance results of conventional treatment plans by adjusting the multileaf collimator (MLC) dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and transmission (T) values of the anisotropic analytic algorithm (AAA) used for portal dose image prediction (PDIP). The AAA-based PDIP v. 16.1 algorithm (PDIP-AAA) of the Eclipse TPS was configured for 6 MV FFF energy. Optimal DLG and T values were achieved for this algorithm by comparing predicted versus measured portal images of the Chair pattern. Twenty clinical plans using 6 MV FFF beams were verified using the optimal PDIP-AAA algorithm and the standard PDIP v. 16 algorithm (PDIP-vE), configured using the van Esch package. The 3% global/2 mm gamma passing rates (GPRs) and average gamma indexes (AGIs) were computed for each acquired image. For each plan, the mean GPR (GPRmean) and mean GAI (GAImean) were compared for both algorithms. A 2-tailed Student t-test (α = 0.05) was used to evaluate whether there was a statistically significant difference. Optimal values of DLG = 0.1 mm and T = 0.01 were found for the PDIP-AAA algorithm, providing significantly better values of GPRmean and AGImean than PDIP-vE (p < 0.001). All plans verified with PIDP-AAA showed GPRmean ≥ 95%. In contrast, only 45% of the plans reported GPRmean ≥ 95% with the PDIP-vE algorithm. The MLC parameters available in the PDIP-AAA model must be tuned to improve the accuracy of the predicted dose image. This work-around is not possible using the standard PDIP algorithm. The adjusted PDIP-AAA resulted in significantly better results than PDIP-vE.

A virtual phantom for patient-specific QA On A 1.5T MR-linac.

Create a virtual ArcCHECK-MR phantom, customized for a 1.5TMR-linac, with consideration of the different density regions within the quality assurance (QA) phantom, aiming to streamline the utilization of this specialized QA device. A virtual phantom was constructed in the treatment planning system (TPS) to replicate the ArcCHECK-MR's composition, consisting of five distinct layers: "Outer" (representing the outer PMMA ring), "Complex" (simulating the printed circuit boards), "Detectors" (encompassing the detector area), "Inner" (signifying the inner PMMA ring) and "Insert" (representing the PMMA insert). These layers were defined based on geometric data and represented as contour points on a set of dummy CT images. Additionally, a setup platform was integrated as contoured structures. To determine the relative electron density (RED) values of the external and internal PMMA components, measurements were taken at 25 points in the insert using an ion chamber. A novel method for establishing the exit/entrance dose ratio (EEDR) for ArcCHECK-MR was introduced. The RED of higher density region was derived by evaluating the local gamma index passing rate results with criteria of 2% dose difference and 2mm distance-to-agreement. The performance of the virtual phantom was assessed for Unity 7 FFF beams with a 1.5T magnetic field. The radii of the five ring structures within the virtual phantom measured 133.0mm, 110.0mm, 103.4mm, 100.0mm, and 75.0mm for the "Outer," "Complex," "Detectors," "Inner" and "Insert" regions, respectively. The RED values were as follows: ArcCHECK-MR PMMA had a RED of 1.130, "Detectors" were assumed to have a RED of 1.000, "Complex" had a RED of 1.200, and the setup QA phantom justified a RED of 1.350. Early validation results demonstrate that the 5-layer virtual phantom, when compared to the commonly used bulk overridden phantom, offers improved capability in MR-linac environments. This enhancement led to an increase in passing rates for the local gamma index by approximately 5 ∼ 6%, when applying the criteria of 2%, 2mm. We have successfully generated a virtual representation of the distinct regions within the ArcCHECK-MR using a TPS, addressing the challenges associated with its use in conjunction with a 1.5T MR-linac. We consistently observed favorable local gamma index passing rates across two 1.5T MR-linac and ArcCHECK-MR unit combinations. This approach has the potential to minimize uncertainties in the creation of the QA phantom for ArcCHECK-MR across various institutions.

Evaluation of intracranial stereotactic treatment plans: a comparison study of CyberKnife and TrueBeam systems

Abstract Background: Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) for patients with intracranial tumours are delivered using a dedicated platform or a conventional linear accelerator with a flattening filter-free beam. Materials and methods: This study compares treatment plans with intracranial tumours. A total of 29 patients were treated on CyberKnife and planned using the Accuray Precision. The same structure sets ws then exported to Varian Eclipse, and plans were made using a 6 MV FFF beam. Both plans were compared for parameters of target coverage, homogeneity index (HI), new conformity index (nCI), gradient index, selectivity index (SI), volumetric and OAR doses. Results: The treatment plans made for CyberKnife exhibit better results in terms of nCI (1·168 ± 0·08 versus 1·173 ± 0·077), SI (0·885 ± 0·05 versus 0·877 ± 0·05) and GI (3·64 ± 0·5 versus 4·45 ± 1·25), while HI values are better for TrueBeam. For OAR doses, in 65·5% and 72% of treatment plans, brainstem and optic pathways received lower doses on CyberKnife, respectively. In terms of dose spillage, Truebeam plans are better for very low doses (V5%), while for V10%, V20% and V50% CyberKnife plans are better. Conclusion: CyberKnife is a better modality for the delivery of SRS/SRT to intracranial tumours except for dose homogeneity where TrueBeam offered better results.

Evaluation of Flattening-Filter-Free and Flattening Filter Dosimetric and Radiobiological Criteria for Lung SBRT: A Volume-Based Analysis

The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams is becoming more prevalent in lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim in this study was to assess the impact of dosimetric and radiobiological differences between FFF and flattening filter (FF) beams for lung SBRT based on the target volume. A total of 198 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans with FFF beams and FF beams were retrospectively selected for this study. For all plans, the prescribed dose was 50 Gy/5 fractions, and the dose volume histogram (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung were recorded and compared. Moreover, monitor units (MUs), the beam on-time and the treatment time were evaluated. The study was performed following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 and 0915 protocols. No significant differences in D90, coverage rate (CR) or conformity index (CI) of the target were observed between FFF beams and FF beams (p>0.05). The D2, R50% and gradient index (GI) for the target improved with FFF beams compared with FF beams (p<0.05). FFF beams also significantly reduced the dose for the lung, heart, spinal cord, esophagus and NTCP of the lung (p<0.05), compared with FF beams. However, there was no significant difference in sparing of the trachea (p>0.05). The mean MUs, beam on-time and treatment time were 1871±278 MUs, 3.2 ±0.2 min and 3.9 ±0.3 min for FFF beams, and 1890±260 MUs, 4.2±0.3 min and 4.8 ±0.4 min for FF beams, respectively. The FFF beam technique for lung SBRT with VMAT results in a better dose fall-off, better dose-sparing of OAR, lower NTCP of the lung and a shorter beam on-time compared with the FF beam technique. Additionally, the improvement in target and OAR-sparing for FFF beams was increased with increasing target volume.

Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Prostate Motion and Interfraction Anatomical Changes in Dose-Escalated Linac-Based SBRT

The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of intrafraction prostate motion and interfraction anatomical changes on dose metrics and the effect of beam gating and motion correction in dose-escalated Linac-based SBRT. Thirteen patients (56 fractions) with organ-confined prostate cancer underwent dose-escalated FFF-VMAT SBRT. Accurate patient setup was ensured by CBCT, and real-time 3D prostate motion data were obtained using a novel electromagnetic tracking device. Treatment was interrupted when the signals exceeded a 2 mm threshold in any of the three spatial directions and couch position was corrected unless the offset was transient. Prostate trajectories with and without beam gating and motion correction events were reconstructed and analyzed. Rectum and bladder volumes on each daily CBCT were recorded and compared with volumes at simulation. The prostate motion observed for each fraction was incorporated into the patient original treatment plan with an isocenter shift method. Actually, delivered treatments were then obtained by recalculating the reconstructed motion-encoded plan on deformed CTs reflecting the patient CBCT-anatomy of the day. Non-gated treatments were also simulated using the prostate motion data assuming that no treatment interruptions have occurred. Treatment interruptions because of target motion trespassing the predefined threshold occurred in 25 fractions (45%). Rectum and bladder volume changes were relevant in most patients. The mean relative dose differences between actually delivered and planned treatments were -3.0% [-18.5 - 2.8] for CTV D99% and -2.6% [-17.8 - 1.0] for PTV D95% over all 56 fractions. However, the median cumulative CTV coverage with 93% of the prescribed dose turned out to be satisfactory. Urethra sparing was slightly degraded and a mean reduction of rectum and bladder dose was seen in all but two dose metrics: the maximum dose to rectum mucosa and the bladder D40%. Nevertheless, only 2 major deviations in rectum mucosa D0.035cc were observed at the end of the treatment. The greatest contribution to target missing and OARs doses came from the interfraction anatomical variations, while intrafraction prostate motion marginally contributed in gated treatments. In non-gated treatments, further deteriorations by 2.4 - 2.8% in minimum target coverage metrics and by 3.1 - 11.6% in bladder dose parameters would have occurred on average. The implemented motion management strategy and the strict patient preparation regimen, along with current PTV margins, robustness of original treatment plans, and fast FFF beam delivery, ensured no significant degradations of dose metrics due to both intrafraction motion and interfraction anatomical changes. Non-gated treatments would have more widely deteriorated the dosimetry of some individual fractions. Thus, continuous monitoring, beam gating and motion correction are recommended to safely deliver dose-escalated prostate SBRT.

Viability of the virtual cone technique using a fixed small multi-leaf collimator field for stereotactic radiosurgery of trigeminal neuralgia.

Dosimetric uncertainties in very small (≤1.5×1.5 cm2 ) photon fields are remarkably higher, which undermines the validity of the virtual cone (VC) technique with a diminutive and variable MLC fields. We evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of the VC method with a very small, fixed MLC field setting, called a fixed virtual cone (fVC), for small target radiosurgery such as trigeminal neuralgia (TGN). The fVC is characterized by 0.5 cm x 0.5cm high-definition (HD) MLC field of 10MV FFF beam defined at 100cm SAD, while backup jaws are positioned at 1.5 cm x 1.5cm. A spherical dose distribution equivalent to 5mm (diameter) physical cone was generated using 10-14 non-coplanar, partial arcs. Dosimetric accuracy was validated using SRS diode (PTW 60018), SRS MapCHECK (SNC) measurements. As a quality assurance measure, 10 treatment plans (SRS) for TGN, consisting of various arc ranges at different collimator angles were analyzed using 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, including a field-by-field study (n=130 fields). Dose outputs were compared between the Eclipse TPS and measurements (SRS MapCHECK). Moreover, dosimetric changes in the field defining fVC, prompted by a minute (±0.5-1.0mm) leaf shift, was examined among TPS, diode measurements, and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. The beam model for fVC was validated (≤3% difference) using SRS MapCHECK based absolute dose measurements. The equivalent diameters of the 50% isodose distribution were found comparable to that of a 5mm cone. Additionally, the comparison of field output factors, dose per MU between the TPS and SRS diode measurements using the fVC field, including±1mm leaf shift, yielded average discrepancies within 5.5% and 3.5% for 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF beams, respectively. Overall, the fVC method is a credible alternative to the physical cone (5mm) that can be applied in routine radiosurgical treatment of TGN.

30 Characterizing a Novel 4 MV FFF Beam for Clinical Application

30 Characterizing a Novel 4 MV FFF Beam for Clinical Application

Evaluation of commercial devices for patient specific QA of stereotactic radiotherapy plans.

Stereotactic radiotherapy (SRT) methods have become common for the treatment of small tumors in various parts of the body. Small field dosimetry has a unique set of challenges when it comes to the pre-treatment validation of a radiotherapy plan that involves film dosimetry or high-resolution detectors. Comparison of commercial quality assurance (QA) devices to the film dosimetry method for pre-treatment evaluation of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), fractionated SRT, and stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans have been evaluated in this study. Forty stereotactic QA plans were measured using EBT-XD film, IBA Matrixx Resolution, SNC ArcCHECK, Varian aS1200 EPID, SNC SRS MapCHECK, and IBA myQA SRS. The results of the commercial devices are compared to the EBT-XD film dosimetry results for each gamma criteria. Treatment plan characteristics such as modulation factor and target volume were investigated for correlation with the passing rates. It was found that all detectors have greater than 95% passing rates at 3%/3mm. Passing rates decrease rapidly for ArcCHECK and the Matrixx as criteria became more strict. In contrast, EBT-XD film, SNC SRS MapCHECK, and IBA myQA SRS passing rates do not decline as rapidly when compared to Matrix Resolution, ArcCHECK, and the EPID. EBT-XD film, SNC SRS MapCHECK, and IBA myQA SRS maintain greater than 90% passing rate at 2%/1mm and greater than 80% at 1%/1mm. Additionally, the ability of these devices to detect changes in dose distribution due to MLC positioning errors was investigated. Ten VMAT SBRT/SRS treatment plans were created with 6MV FFF or 10MV FFF beam energies using Eclipse 15.6. A MATLAB script was used to create two MLC positioning error scenarios from the original treatment plan. It was found that errors in MLC positioning were most reliably detected at 2%/1mm for high-resolution detectors and that lower-resolution detectors did not consistently detect MLC positioning errors.

PO-1782 Dosimetric comparison between gated and ungated SBRT plans using VMAT with FFF beams

PO-1782 Dosimetric comparison between gated and ungated SBRT plans using VMAT with FFF beams

PO-1895 The impact of 10MV FFF beams on delivery time for phase gated SBRT lung radiotherapy

PO-1895 The impact of 10MV FFF beams on delivery time for phase gated SBRT lung radiotherapy

Technical note: Energy dependence of the Gafchromic EBT4 film: Dose-response curves for 70kV, 6MV, 6MV FFF, 10MV FFF, and 15MV x-ray beams.

EBT4 was newly released for radiotherapy quality assurance to improve the signal-to-noise ratio in radiochromic film dosimetry. It is important to know its dose-response characteristics before its use in the clinic. This study aims to investigate and compare the dose-response curves of the Gafchromic EBT4 film for megavoltage and kilovoltage x-ray beams with different dose levels, scanning spatial resolutions, and sizes of region of interest (ROI). EBT4 film (Lot#07052201) calibration strips (3.5×20cm2 ) were exposed to a 10×10cm2 open field at doses of 0, 63, 125, 500, 750, 1000cGy using 6MV photon beam. EBT4 film strips from the same lot were then exposed to each x-ray beam (6MV, 6MV FFF, 10MV FFF, 15MV, and 70kV) at six dose values (50, 100, 300, 600, 800, 1000cGy). A full sheet (25×20cm2 ) of EBT4 film was irradiated at each energy with 300cGy for profile comparison with the treatment planning calculation. At two different spatial resolutions of 72 and 300dpi, each film piece was scanned three consecutive times in the center of an Epson 10000XL flatbed scanner in 48-bit color. The scanned images were analyzed using FilmQA Pro. For each scanned image, an ROI of 2×2cm2 at the field center was selected to obtain the average pixel value with its standard deviation in the ROI. An additional ROI of 1cm diameter circle was also used to evaluate the impact of ROI shape and size, especially for FFF beams. The dose value, average dose-response value, and associated uncertainty were determined for each energy and relative responses were analyzed. The Student's t-test was performed to evaluate the statistical significance of the dose-response values with different color channels, ROI shapes, and spatial resolutions. The dose-response curves for the five x-ray energies were compared in three color channels. Weak energy dependence was found among the megavoltage beams. No significant differences (average ∼1.1%) were observed for all doses in this study among 6 MV, 6 MV FFF, 10 MV FFF, and 15 MV beams, regardless of spatial resolution and color channel. However, a statistically significant difference in dose-response was observed up to 12% between 70kV and 6MV beams. The dose-response curves for Gafchromic EBT4 films were nearly independent of the energy of the photon beams among 6MV, 6MV FFF, 10MV FFF, and 15MV. For very low-energy photons (e.g., 70kV), a separate calibration from the same low-energy x-ray is necessary.

Evaluation of flattening-filter-free and flattening filter dosimetric and radiobiological criteria for lung SBRT: A volume-based analysis.

The use of volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) with flattening-filter-free (FFF) beams is becoming more prevalent in lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). The aim in this study was to assess the impact of dosimetric and radiobiological differences between FFF and flattening filter (FF) beams for lung SBRT based on the target volume. A total of 198 lung stereotactic body radiation therapy treatment plans with FFF beams and FF beams were retrospectively selected for this study. For all plans, the prescribed dose was 50 Gy/5 fractions, and the dose volume histogram (DVH) for the target and organs at risk (OAR) and the normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) of the lung were recorded and compared. Moreover, monitor units (MUs), the beam on-time and the treatment time were evaluated. The study was performed following the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 0813 and 0915 protocols. No significant differences in D90, coverage rate (CR) or conformity index (CI) of the target were observed between FFF beams and FF beams (p>0.05). The D2, R50% and gradient index (GI) for the target improved with FFF beams compared with FF beams (p<0.05). FFF beams also significantly reduced the dose for the lung, heart, spinal cord, esophagus and NTCP of the lung (p<0.05), compared with FF beams. However, there was no significant difference in sparing of the trachea (p>0.05). The mean MUs, beam on-time and treatment time were 1871 ± 278 MUs, 3.2 ± 0.2min and 3.9 ± 0.3min for FFF beams, and 1890 ± 260 MUs, 4.2 ± 0.3min and 4.8 ± 0.4min for FF beams, respectively. The FFF beam technique for lung SBRT with VMAT results in a better dose fall-off, better dose-sparing of OAR, lower NTCP of the lung and a shorter beam on-time compared with the FF beam technique. Additionally, the improvement in target and OAR-sparing for FFF beams was increased with increasing target volume.

Characterization of Ethos therapy systems for adaptive radiation therapy: A multi-machine comparison.

The recently released Ethos therapy system (Varian Medical Systems) allows for online CBCT-guided adaptive radiation therapy (RT). The clinical introduction of multiple systems requires machine characterization and machine variation quantification to allow patient interchangeability between systems. Despite several clinical introductions, limited vendor-independent information on machine performance is available. Our aim was to determine the relevant dosimetric and mechanical characteristics of individual machines and to quantify machine variations. Six Ethos treatment machines, equipped with a 6-MV FFF beam including dual-layer MLC and kV-CBCT system, were recently introduced clinically after extensive machine characterization and pre-configured beam model verification. Point doses and profiles were measured and compared to vendor-provided reference data and dose calculations. Also, dose calculations were verified based on point measurements for non-standard fields and dose distributions for optimized treatment plans. Agreements between dose profiles (dose distributions) were quantified using 1D (3D) γ-analysis. Additionally, we quantified leaf transmission, dosimetric leaf gap (DLG) and couch attenuation, determined isocenter accuracy and kV-MV isocenter coincidence and verified the kV-CBCT system. Machine variations were quantified for all dosimetric and mechanical characteristics. For all machines, distinct agreements were found between measurements and vendor-provided reference data as well as measurements and dose calculations. Mean γ1%/1mm values for all profiles were below 0.30. All profiles, point measurements and dose distributions matched well among the six machines. Minimal machine variations were found in terms of DLG (0.05mm), leaf transmission (0.001%), isocenter accuracy (0.08mm), kV-MV isocenter coincidence (0.15mm), couch attenuation (0.69%), and CBCT imaging dose (0.29mGy). This study demonstrates excellent agreement between individual Ethos therapy systems and vendor-provided reference data as well as a pre-configured beam model. Furthermore, our results show good consistency among all machines and provide valuable insights on relevant machine characteristics. The systematically obtained results provide benchmark data for future clinical introduction of Ethos therapy systems.