Fenofibrate Intervention And Event Lowering In Diabetes Research Articles

No relationship between socioeconomic status, education level and development and progression of diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: a FIELD trial substudy.

In 6002 Australian adults with type 2 diabetes and a median 5-year follow-up in the FIELD(Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes) trial, baseline socioeconomic status (SES) and self-reported education level were not related to development of on-trial sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy. Similarly, in a retinal photography substudy (n = 549), two-step diabetic retinopathy progression was not related to SES or education.

1350-P: Risk Models for the Development of Cardiovascular and Microvascular Events in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes in the FIELD Study

Background: There are a few prediction models for chronic complications in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study developed such risk models. Methods: Data from 9795 adults with T2D in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial were used to develop risk prediction models for total CVD events, cardiovascular mortality, amputations and new microvascular events using 27 candidate traditional risk factors and additional novel biomarkers (incl. vascular and systemic inflammation, oxidative stress; n=26) using exhaustive search methods. Results: There were 1295 total first CVD events, 267 CVD deaths, 115 amputations and 1530 new microvascular events. A total of 19 and 18 traditional risk factors were selected in the clinical risk models for total CVD events and CVD mortality, with AUC of 0.723 and 0.821 respectively. For individual microvascular complications, the AUC of their models ranged from 0.656 to 0.895. The addition of novel biomarkers to the clinical risk models only resulted in modestly higher AUC (Table below). Conclusion: New clinical risk models can be implemented as risk prediction tools for chronic complications in adults with T2D, including for sight-threatening retinopathy and amputations. Novel biomarkers may guide future research on disease mechanisms, but had limited predictive value over clinical variables. Disclosure K.Ong: None. M.Taskinen: Board Member; Novo Nordisk, Consultant; Eli Lilly and Company, Novartis, Akcea, Research Support; Novo Nordisk. R.J.Simes: None. A.Jenkins: Advisory Panel; Insulet Corporation, Board Member; Insulin for Life, Research Support; Abbott Diabetes, Medtronic, Hemsley Charitable Trust, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation (JDRF), National Institutes of Health. A.C.Keech: None. On behalf of the field study investigators: n/a. R.L.O'connell: None. A.S.Januszewski: None. M.W.Donoghoe: None. V.Gebski: None. D.Sullivan: None. K.Rye: None. R.S.Scott: None. J.D.Best: None. Funding Laboratories Fournier; National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (457103, 1024105, 1037786)

Optimised plasma sample preparation and LC-MS analysis to support large-scale proteomic analysis of clinical trial specimens: Application to the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial.

Robust, affordable plasma proteomic biomarker workflows are needed for large-scale clinical studies. We evaluated aspects of sample preparation to allow liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) analysis of more than 1500 samples from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial of adults with type 2 diabetes. Using LC-MS with data-independent acquisition we evaluated four variables: plasma protein depletion, EDTA or citrated anti-coagulant blood collection tubes, plasma lipid depletion strategies and plasma freeze-thaw cycles. Optimised methods were applied in a pilot study of FIELD participants. LC-MS of undepleted plasma conducted over a 45min gradient yielded 172 proteins after excluding immunoglobulin isoforms. Cibachrome-blue-based depletion yielded additional proteins but with cost and time expenses, while immunodepleting albumin and IgG provided few additional identifications. Only minor variations were associated with blood collection tube type, delipidation methods and freeze-thaw cycles. From 65 batches involving over 1500 injections, the median intra-batch quantitative differences in the top 100 proteins of the plasma external standard were less than 2%. Fenofibrate altered seven plasma proteins. A robust plasma handling and LC-MS proteomics workflow for abundant plasma proteins has been developed for large-scale biomarker studies that balance proteomic depth with time and resource costs.

Factors associated with fragility fractures in type 2 diabetes: An analysis of the randomised controlled Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study.

Fracture risk is elevated in some type 2 diabetes patients. Bone fragility may be associated with more clinically severe type 2 diabetes, although prospective studies are lacking. It is unknown which diabetes-related characteristics are independently associated with fracture risk. In this post-hoc analysis of fracture data from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial (ISRCTN#64783481), we hypothesised that diabetic microvascular complications are associated with bone fragility. The FIELD trial randomly assigned 9795 type 2 diabetes participants (aged 50-75years) to receive oral co-micronised fenofibrate 200mg (n=4895) or placebo (n=4900) daily for a median of 5years. We used Cox proportional hazards models to identify baseline sex-specific diabetes-related parameters independently associated with incident fractures. Over 49,470 person-years, 137/6138 men experienced 141 fractures and 143/3657 women experienced 145 fractures; incidence rates for the first fracture of 4∙4 (95% CI 3∙8-5∙2) and 7∙7 per 1000 person-years (95% CI 6∙5-9∙1), respectively. Fenofibrate had no effect on fracture outcomes. In men, baseline macrovascular disease (HR 1∙52, 95% CI 1∙05-2∙21, p=0∙03), insulin use (HR 1∙62, HR 1∙03-2∙55, p=0∙03), and HDL-cholesterol (HR 2∙20, 95% CI 1∙11-4∙36, p=0∙02) were independently associated with fracture. In women, independent risk factors included baseline peripheral neuropathy (HR 2∙04, 95% CI 1∙16-3∙59, p=0∙01) and insulin use (HR 1∙55, 95% CI 1∙02-2∙33, p=0∙04). Insulin use and sex-specific complications (in men, macrovascular disease; in women, neuropathy) are independently associated with fragility fractures in adults with type 2 diabetes.

Retinopathy risk calculators in the prediction of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy in type 2 diabetes: A FIELD substudy

AimsTo evaluate the risk algorithm by Aspelund et al. for predicting sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (STDR) in Type 2 diabetes (T2D), and to develop a new STDR prediction model. MethodsThe Aspelund et al. algorithm was used to calculate STDR risk from baseline variables in 1012 participants in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) ophthalmological substudy, compared to on-trial STDR status, and receiver operating characteristic analysis performed. Using multivariable logistic regression, traditional risk factors and fenofibrate allocation as STDR predictors were evaluated, with bootstrap-based optimism-adjusted estimates of predictive performance calculated. ResultsSTDR developed in 28 participants. The Aspelund et al. algorithm predicted STDR at 2- and 5-years with area under the curve (AUC) 0.86 (95% CI 0.77–0.94) and 0.86 (0.81–0.92), respectively. In the second model STDR risk factors were any DR at baseline (OR 24.0 [95% CI 5.53–104]), HbA1c (OR 1.95 [1.43–2.64]) and male sex (OR 4.34 [1.32–14.3]), while fenofibrate (OR 0.13 [0.05–0.38]) was protective. This model had excellent discriminatory ability (AUC = 0.89). ConclusionsThe algorithm by Aspelund et al. predicts STDR well in the FIELD ophthalmology substudy. Logistic regression analysis found DR at baseline, male sex, and HbA1c were predictive of STDR and, fenofibrate was protective.

The relationship of neutrophil elastase and proteinase 3 with risk factors, and chronic complications in type 2 diabetes: A Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) sub-study

Introduction:Neutrophil elastase (NE) and proteinase 3 (PR3) are novel inflammation biomarkers. We investigated their associations with chronic complications, determinants of biomarker levels and effects of fenofibrate in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) from Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study.Methods:Plasma NE and PR3 levels were quantified at baseline (n = 2000), and relationships with complications over 5-years assessed. Effects of fenofibrate on biomarker levels (n = 200) were determined at four follow-up visits.Results:Higher waist-to-hip ratio, homocysteine and C-reactive protein and lower apoA-II were determinants of higher NE and PR3 levels. Higher NE levels were associated with on-trial stroke and cardiovascular mortality, and higher PR3 levels with on-trial stroke, but associations were not significant after adjustment for confounding factors. Although higher NE and PR3 levels were associated with baseline total microvascular disease, only NE levels were associated with on-trial neuropathy or amputation. These associations were not significant after adjusting for multiple comparisons. NE and PR3 levels did not change with fenofibrate.Conclusions:In T2DM plasma NE and PR3 levels are associated with vascular risk factors, and total microvascular disease at baseline, but on rigorous analyses were not associated with on-trial complications. Levels were not changed by fenofibrate.

Relationships of adipocyte-fatty acid binding protein and lipocalin 2 with risk factors and chronic complications in type 2 diabetes and effects of fenofibrate: A fenofibrate Intervention and event lowering in diabetes sub-study

AimsTo investigate determinants of circulating levels of adipocyte-fatty acid binding protein (A-FABP) and lipocalin-2 (LCN2), their relationships with cardiovascular disease (CVD) and microvascular events, and effects of fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes (T2D). MethodsA-FABP and LCN2 were quantified in baseline plasma from 2000 T2D adults in a Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial sub-study and correlates thereof determined. In a subset (n = 200) adipokines were also measured on-trial. ResultsFemale sex, older age, higher body mass index (BMI), HbA1c, insulin resistance index, triglycerides, plasma creatinine and homocysteine, shorter diabetes duration, and use of oral hypoglycaemic agents alone were independent determinants of higher A-FABP. Higher BMI, fibrinogen and homocysteine, Caucasian race, and lower fasting glucose, HDL-cholesterol, apolipoprotein A-II and estimated glomerular filtration rate were independent predictors of higher LCN2 levels. Baseline A-FABP and LCN2 levels were associated with multiple new CVD and microvascular events over 5-years, though significance was lost after risk factor adjustment. Fenofibrate increased A-FABP but did not change LCN2 levels. ConclusionsBaseline plasma A-FABP and LCN2 levels were associated with concurrent CVD risk factors, and on-trial chronic complications, likely mediated via traditional risk factors. Fenofibrate increased A-FABP modestly but did not affect LCN2 levels.Clinical Trial Registration: ISRCTN 64783481.

Association of Fenofibrate and Diabetic Retinopathy in Type 2 Diabetic Patients: A Population-Based Retrospective Cohort Study in Taiwan.

Background and Objectives: Fenofibrate, a PPAR-α agonist, has been demonstrated to reduce the progression of diabetic retinopathy (DR) and the need for laser treatment in a FIELD (Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes) study. However, in the subgroup of patients without pre-existing DR, there was no significant difference in the progression of DR between the fenofibrate group and the placebo group. In this study, we aim to investigate whether fenofibrate can decrease the risk of incident DR in a population-based cohort study of type 2 diabetic patients in Taiwan. Materials and Methods: A total of 32,253 type 2 diabetic patients without previous retinopathy were retrieved from 892,419 patients in 2001–2002. They were then divided into two groups based on whether they were exposed to fenofibrate or not. The patients were followed until a diagnosis of diabetic retinopathy was made or until the year 2008. Results: With a follow-up period of 6.8 ± 1.5 years and 5.4 ± 2.6 years for 2500 fenofibrate users and 29,753 non-users, respectively, the Cox proportional hazard regression analysis revealed that the hazard ratio (HR) of new onset retinopathy was 0.57 (95% CI 0.57–0.62, p < 0.001). After adjusting for hypertension; the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI); and medications such as angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I), angiotensin receptor blockers (ARB), anticoagulants, gemfibrozil, statins, and hypoglycemic agents, the adjusted HR was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68–0.82, p < 0.001). The need for laser treatment has an HR and adjusted HR of 0.59 (95% CI 0.49–0.71, p < 0.001) and 0.67 (95% CI 0.56–0.81, p < 0.001), respectively. Conclusion: Our study showed that the long-term and regular use of fenofibrate may decrease the risk of incident retinopathy and the need for laser treatment in type 2 diabetic patients. Since there are limitations associated with our study, further investigations are necessary to confirm such an association.

Uric acid predicts long-term cardiovascular risk in type 2 diabetes but does not mediate the benefits of fenofibrate: The FIELD study.

To explore the relationship between baseline uric acid (UA) levels and long-term cardiovascular events in adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and to determine whether the cardioprotective effects of fenofibrate are partly mediated through its UA-lowering effects. Data from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial were utilized, comprising 9795 adults with T2D randomly allocated to treatment with fenofibrate or matching placebo. Plasma UA was measured before and after a 6-week, active fenofibrate run-in phase in all participants. Cox proportional hazards models were used to explore the relationships between baseline UA, pre-to-post run-in reductions in UA and long-term cardiovascular outcomes. Mean baseline plasma UA was 0.33 mmol/L (SD 0.08). Baseline UA was a significant predictor of long-term cardiovascular events, with every 0.1 mmol/L higher UA conferring a 21% increase in event rate (HR 1.21, 95% CI 1.13-1.29, P < .001). This remained significant after adjustment for treatment allocation, cardiovascular risk factors and renal function. The extent of UA reduction during fenofibrate run-in was also a significant predictor of long-term cardiovascular events, with every 0.1 mmol/L greater reduction conferring a 14% lower long-term risk (HR 0.86, 95% CI 0.76-0.97, P = .015). This effect was not modified by treatment allocation (Pinteraction = .77). UA is a strong independent predictor of long-term cardiovascular risk in adults with T2D. Although greater reduction in UA on fenofibrate is predictive of lower cardiovascular risk, this does not appear to mediate the cardioprotective effects of fenofibrate.

Role of High-Density Lipoproteins in Cholesterol Homeostasis and Glycemic Control.

Role of High-Density Lipoproteins in Cholesterol Homeostasis and Glycemic Control.

Pemafibrate Prevents Retinal Pathological Neovascularization by Increasing FGF21 Level in a Murine Oxygen-Induced Retinopathy Model.

Large-scale clinical trials, such as the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) studies, have shown that the administration of fenofibrate, a peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor alpha (PPARα) agonist, suppresses the progression of diabetic retinopathy. In this paper, we reveal a therapeutic effect of a selective PPARα modulator (SPPARMα), pemafibrate, against pathological angiogenesis in murine models of retinopathy. Oxygen-induced retinopathy (OIR) was induced in C57BL/6J mice by exposure to 85% oxygen from postnatal day eight (P8) for 72 h. Vehicle, pemafibrate or fenofibrate was administrated by oral gavage from P12 to P16 daily. Administration of pemafibrate, but not fenofibrate, significantly reduced pathological angiogenesis in OIR. After oral pemafibrate administration, expression levels of downstream PPARα targets such as acyl-CoA oxidase 1 (Acox1), fatty acid binding protein 4 (Fabp4), and fibroblast growth factor 21 (Fgf21) were significantly increased in the liver but not in the retina. A significant increase in plasma FGF21 and reduced retinal hypoxia-inducible factor-1α (HIF-1α) and vascular endothelial growth factor A (Vegfa) were also observed after this treatment. In an in vitro HIF-luciferase assay, a long-acting FGF21 analogue, but not pemafibrate, suppressed HIF activity. These data indicate that SPPARMα pemafibrate administration may prevent retinal pathological neovascularization by upregulating FGF21 in the liver.

Fenofibrate for Diabetic Retinopathy.

Fenofibrate is a safe and inexpensive orally administered fibric acid derivative conventionally used to treat dyslipidemia. Two large randomized clinical trials, the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) and the Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk in Diabetes (ACCORD) studies, demonstrated the benefit of oral fenofibrate in the treatment of patients with type 2 diabetes and diabetic retinopathy (DR), including reduced disease progression and need for laser treatment for diabetic macular edema and proliferative diabetic retinopathy. These findings are supported by results of experimental studies, which have demonstrated beneficial effects of fenofibrate ameliorating retinal vascular leakage and leukostasis, downregulating vascular endothelial growth factor, and reducing endothelial cell and pericyte loss, among others; all of these are characteristic features of DR. In spite of this evidence, fenofibrate is not prescribed routinely for treating patients with diabetes and DR. In FIELD and ACCORD studies, retinopathy was not the primary outcome and this may explain, at least partly, its lack of use for this indication. New trials are now underway to specifically address the effects of fenofibrate in DR; these trials will provide additional and robust data that may support current evidence favoring the use of fenofibrate in this common microvascular complication of diabetes.

Fenofibrate effects on carotid artery intima-media thickness in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A FIELD substudy

AimDyslipidemia in type 2 diabetes contributes to an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Fenofibrate, a lipid-regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, has been shown to reduce vascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes. The mechanisms for such benefit, however, are not yet well understood. We examined the effects of fenofibrate on carotid intima-media thickness (IMT), a marker of subclinical atherosclerosis, in adults with type 2 diabetes. MethodsIn a prospectively designed substudy of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, we assessed carotid IMT in a subset of 422 representative adults. Traditional risk factors and IMT were assessed at 2 and 4 years after randomisation to fenofibrate (200 mg daily) or placebo. The prespecified primary study endpoint was the difference in IMT between treatment groups at 4 years. Post-hoc analyses were performed according to dyslipidemia and metabolic syndrome status. ResultsThere was no difference in carotid IMT comparing those assigned to fenofibrate or placebo at 2 or 4 years, despite statistically significant improvement in lipid and lipoprotein parameters at 2 and 4 years, including TC, LDL-C and TG, and HDL-C at 4 months and 2 years. Similarly, there was no difference in carotid IMT on fenofibrate compared with placebo in those with dyslipidemia or metabolic syndrome. ConclusionsFenofibrate was not associated with improved carotid IMT in adults with type 2 diabetes when compared with placebo, despite a statistically significant improvement in TC, LDL-C and TG at 2 and 4 years, and HDL-C at 4 months and 2 years.

Effect of fenofibrate on uric acid and gout in type 2 diabetes: a post-hoc analysis of the randomised, controlled FIELD study

Gout is a painful disorder and is common in type 2 diabetes. Fenofibrate lowers uric acid and reduces gout attacks in small, short-term studies. Whether fenofibrate produces sustained reductions in uric acid and gout attacks is unknown. In the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial, participants aged 50-75 years with type 2 diabetes were randomly assigned to receive either co-micronised fenofibrate 200 mg once per day or matching placebo for a median of 5 years follow-up. We did a post-hoc analysis of recorded on-study gout attacks and plasma uric acid concentrations according to treatment allocation. The outcomes of this analysis were change in uric acid concentrations and risk of on-study gout attacks. The FIELD study is registered with ISRCTN, number ISRCTN64783481. Between Feb 23, 1998, and Nov 3, 2000, 9795 patients were randomly assigned to fenofibrate (n=4895) or placebo (n=4900) in the FIELD study. Uric acid concentrations fell by 20·2% (95% CI 19·9-20·5) during the 6-week active fenofibrate run-in period immediately pre-randomisation (a reduction of 0·06 mmol/L or 1 mg/dL) and remained -20·1% (18·5-21·7, p<0·0001) lower in patients taking fenofibrate than in those on placebo in a random subset re-measured at 1 year. With placebo allocation, there were 151 (3%) first gout events over 5 years, compared with 81 (2%) among those allocated fenofibrate (HR with treatment 0·54, 95% CI 0·41-0·70; p<0·0001). In the placebo group, the cumulative proportion of patients with first gout events was 7·7% in patients with baseline uric acid concentration higher than 0·36 mmol/L and 13·9% in those with baseline uric acid concentration higher than 0·42 mmol/L, compared with 3·4% and 5·7%, respectively, in the fenofibrate group. Risk reductions were similar among men and women and those with dyslipidaemia, on diuretics, and with elevated uric acid concentrations. For participants with elevated baseline uric acid concentrations despite taking allopurinol at study entry, there was no heterogeneity of the treatment effect of fenofibrate on gout risk. Taking account of all gout events, fenofibrate treatment halved the risk (HR 0·48, 95% CI 0·37-0·60; p<0·0001) compared with placebo. Fenofibrate lowered uric acid concentrations by 20%, and almost halved first on-study gout events over 5 years of treatment. Fenofibrate could be a useful adjunct for preventing gout in diabetes. None.

Baseline Circulating FGF21 Concentrations and Increase after Fenofibrate Treatment Predict More Rapid Glycemic Progression in Type 2 Diabetes: Results from the FIELD Study.

It is not known whether circulating fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) concentrations are associated with glycemic progression in patients with established type 2 diabetes. This study reports this relationship in type 2 diabetes patients participating in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) trial. Plasma FGF21 was quantified in 9697 study participants. Among patients with lifestyle-only glucose control measures at baseline, glycemic progression was defined as the initiation of oral hypoglycemic agents or insulin therapy. We assessed the relationship of FGF21 concentrations with glycohemoglobin (Hb A1c), the homeostasis model assessment of β-cell function (HOMA-B) and insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), and glycemic progression. Among 2584 patients with lifestyle-only glycemic therapy at baseline, plasma FGF21 concentrations were positively associated with HOMA-IR (5.1% increase per 100% increase in FGF21 concentrations). Patients with higher baseline plasma FGF21 concentrations had higher risk of glycemic progression over a 5-year period (P = 0.02), but the association was not significant after further adjusting for alanine aminotransferase (ALT) enzyme activity. During the fenofibrate active run-in phase, higher tertiles of fenofibrate-induced increase in FGF21 concentrations were associated with higher risk of glycemic progression (adjusted hazards ratio = 1.09 and 1.18 for tertiles 2 and 3, respectively, P for trend = 0.01), even after adjusting for ALT enzyme activity. This association was statistically significant in the fenofibrate group only (P = 0.01). Higher baseline and fenofibrate-induced increase in FGF21 concentrations predict more rapid glycemic progression in type 2 diabetes patients. This association may be partly explained by hepatic function.

Opposite associations between alanine aminotransferase and γ-glutamyl transferase levels and all-cause mortality in type 2 diabetes: Analysis of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study

AimsReported associations between liver enzymes and mortality may not hold true in type 2 diabetes, owing to a high prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, which has been linked to cardiovascular disease and mortality in its own right. Our study aimed to determine whether alanine aminotransferase (ALT) or γ-glutamyl transferase (GGT) levels predict mortality in type 2 diabetes, and to examine possible mechanisms. MethodsData from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study were analyzed to examine the relationship between liver enzymes and all-cause and cause-specific mortality over 5years. ResultsOver 5years, 679 (6.9%) individuals died. After adjustment, for every standard deviation increase in ALT (13.2U/L), the HR for death on study was 0.85 (95% CI 0.78–0.93), p<0.001. Conversely, GGT >70U/L, compared with GGT ≤70U/L, had HR 1.82 (1.48–2.24), p<0.001. For cause-specific mortality, lower ALT was associated with a higher risk of cardiovascular death only, whereas GGT >70U/L was associated with higher risks of death due to cardiovascular disease, cancer and non-cancer/non-cardiovascular causes. The relationship for ALT persisted after adjustment for indirect measures of frailty but was attenuated by elevated hsCRP. ConclusionsAs in the general population, ALT has a negative, and GGT a positive, correlation with mortality in type 2 diabetes when ALT is less than two times the upper limit of normal. The relationship for ALT appears specific for death due to cardiovascular disease. Links of low ALT with frailty, as a potential mechanism for relationships seen, were neither supported nor conclusively refuted by our analysis and other factors are also likely to be important in those with type 2 diabetes.

Fenofibrate effects on arterial endothelial function in adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: A FIELD substudy

ObjectiveDislipidaemia in type 2 diabetes mellitus contributes to arterial endothelial dysfunction and an increased risk of cardiovascular disease. Fenofibrate, a lipid-regulating peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-α (PPARα) agonist, has been shown to reduce vascular complications in adults with type 2 diabetes. However, the mechanisms for such benefit are not well understood. We examined the effects of fenofibrate on brachial artery endothelial function in adults with type 2 diabetes. MethodsIn a prospectively designed substudy of the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study, we assessed arterial flow-mediated dilatation (FMD; endothelium-dependent dilatation) and dilator responses to glyceryl trinitrate (GTN, an endothelium-independent dilator) in a subset of 193 representative adults. Traditional risk factors were assessed at baseline, 4 months and 2 years after randomised treatment allocation to fenofibrate (200 mg daily) or placebo. The prespecified primary study endpoint was the difference in FMD between treatment groups at 4 months. ResultsFenofibrate was associated with a significant improvement at 4 months compared with placebo (+1.05% (absolute); P=0.03); GTN-dilator responses were unchanged (P=0.77). After 2 years, FMD was similar in both groups (P=0.46). In multivariable models, none of the fenofibrate-related changes in lipoproteins and lipids were significantly associated with improved FMD on fenofibrate at 4 months. ConclusionTreatment with fenofibrate significantly improved arterial endothelial function after 4 months. However, the effect was no longer apparent after 2 years. The long-term beneficial vascular effects of fenofibrate in type 2 diabetes are likely to be mediated via mechanisms other than improvement in endothelium-dependent dilatation of conduit arteries, and may differ for the microcirculation.

Relationship of fibroblast growth factor 21 with baseline and new on-study microvascular disease in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study

Baseline circulating fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels can predict total cardiovascular disease events in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. This paper describes the relationship of baseline FGF21 levels and new on-study microvascular disease in patients with type 2 diabetes from the FIELD study. Baseline FGF21 levels were measured in plasma by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay in 9697 study participants. Total microvascular disease was defined as the presence of any nephropathy, retinopathy, neuropathy and/or microvascular amputation. The relationship between FGF21 levels and microvascular disease was assessed by multivariable logistic regression. Higher baseline FGF21 levels were found in patients with baseline total microvascular disease (p<0.001). The association remained significant after adjusting for potential confounding factors (OR [95% CI] 1.13 [1.08, 1.19] per SD increase in log e -transformed FGF21 levels, p<0.001). Of 6465 patients without baseline total microvascular disease, 1517 developed new on-study total microvascular disease over 5 years of follow-up. Higher baseline FGF21 levels were associated with a higher risk of new on-study total microvascular disease after adjusting for potential confounding factors (OR [95% CI] 1.09 [1.02, 1.16] per SD increase in log e -transformed FGF21 levels, p=0.01). Addition of FGF21 levels in a model of new on-study total microvascular disease with established risk factors significantly, but modestly, increased the integrated discrimination improvement and the net reclassification improvement (both p < 0.01). Higher baseline FGF21 levels are seen in patients with type 2 diabetes and established microvascular disease, and predict the future development of new microvascular disease.

The relationship of fibroblast growth factor 21 with cardiovascular outcome events in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes study.

Circulating fibroblast growth factor 21 (FGF21) levels are often elevated in obesity, dyslipidaemia, insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes. This study investigated the relationship of plasma FGF21 levels with cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. Plasma FGF21 levels were measured by ELISA at baseline in 9,697 individuals with type 2 diabetes participating in the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. We assessed the association of FGF21 levels with the incidence of different cardiovascular outcomes over 5 years. The primary outcome was total cardiovascular disease (CVD) events and the secondary outcomes were the four individual components: coronary heart disease events, total stroke, CVD mortality and coronary and carotid revascularisation. The tertiary outcome was hospitalisation for angina pectoris. Higher baseline FGF21 levels were associated with higher risks of all cardiovascular outcome events after adjusting for the study treatment allocation (all p < 0.01). The associations remained significant for total CVD events and for coronary and carotid revascularisation after further adjusting for confounding factors, with the HR (95% CI) being 1.28 (1.10, 1.50) and 1.26 (1.01, 1.56), respectively, for the highest tertile compared with the lowest tertile (overall effect p = 0.002 and 0.007, respectively). The addition of FGF21 levels to a model including established CVD risk factors predicting total CVD events led to a non-significant increase in the C-statistic but there was a significant improvement in integrated discrimination and net reclassification. Higher baseline plasma FGF21 levels were associated with higher risk of cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes. ISRCTN64783481.

Cigarette smoking and albuminuria are associated with impaired arterial smooth muscle function in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a FIELD substudy

AimImpaired arterial function has been implicated in diabetes-related atherosclerosis, but its determinants in high-risk adults have not been well characterised. We investigated factors associated with impaired arterial function in adults with type 2 diabetes. MethodsFlow-mediated dilatation (a marker of endothelial function) and dilator response to glyceryl trinitrate (to assess smooth muscle function) of the brachial artery were assessed at baseline in 193 patients with type 2 diabetes from the Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes (FIELD) study. Traditional risk factors were assessed and a multivariable model was constructed to identify factors independently associated with impaired arterial function. ResultsMedian age was 64 years (interquartile range, 58–69; 61% male) and duration of diabetes was 4 years (interquartile range, 2–9). Flow-mediated dilatation (3.06±0.25%, mean±SEM) was severely impaired but not significantly associated with other risk factors. Dilator responses to glyceryl trinitrate (10.56±0.52%) were significantly and independently impaired in past and present cigarette smokers (P=0.005) and in subjects with increased urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (P=0.01). ConclusionsIn adults with type 2 diabetes and known or suspected atherosclerosis, arterial smooth muscle-dependent dilatation was shown to be significantly impaired in cigarette smokers and those with elevated urinary albumin levels.