Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Patients Research Articles

Clinical presentation of anterior pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance among patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: a cross-sectional study.

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) significantly affects the physical function and quality of life of the young and middle-aged population. Pelvic tilt and trunk muscle endurance are physical features poorly studied in FAIS. This study aimed to compare the anterior pelvic tilt and anterior, lateral, and posterior trunk muscles endurance between people with FAIS and healthy individuals, within FAIS sub types and between the symptomatic and asymptomatic hip in people with FAIS. Cross-sectional study. Participants were recruited and screened for potential eligibility at the Rehabilitation, Sports Medicine, and Physiotherapy Unit between April 2021 and February 2022. Sixty-nine patients with FAIS and 69 controls. A study adhering to STROBE guidelines recruited 138 participants (69 FAIS, 69 controls). The degree of pelvic tilt was measured by the palpation meter (PALM) tool. To assess trunk musculature endurance, isometric trunk tests described by McGill were performed (extension resistance test, flexion resistance test, and side plank test). Cases were classified based on FAIS subtypes. Differences between groups and subgroups were performed using t-tests and ANCOVA, respectively. Significant differences in anterior pelvic tilt were observed between the control and FAIS groups (P<0.001, d=0.72). Participants with FAIS exhibited greater pelvic tilt (MD=1.57, 95% CI=0.83 to 2.3). Trunk muscle endurance showed statistically significant differences (P<0.001, d=0.72) for posterior muscles. In comparisons between symptomatic and asymptomatic hips, significant differences were found in pelvic tilt (P<0.001, d=0.26) and lateral trunk muscle endurance (P<0.001, d=0.43). FAIS subtypes demonstrated significant differences in lateral trunk muscle endurance (P=0.002, η<inf>p</inf>2=0.209). This study found that patients with FAIS present large anterior pelvic tilt and lower posterior trunk muscle endurance. Although anterior pelvic tilt was comparable for all FAIS subtypes, Pincer-type with or without labral tear exhibited lower lateral trunk muscle endurance compared with Cam-type with or without labral tear. In addition, the symptomatic hip of FAIS patients showed lower lateral trunk muscle endurance compared to the asymptomatic hip. Incorporating rehabilitation strategies that address pelvic tilt and trunk muscle strengthening in individuals with FAIS might be considered as a potential means to improve these physical impairments, pending careful evaluation of their effectiveness.

Effect of Spinopelvic Parameters on Outcomes After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

Background: Spinopelvic parameters, including pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), and pelvic incidence, have been developed to characterize the relationship between lumbar spine and hip motion, but a paucity of literature is available characterizing differences in spinopelvic parameters among patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) versus patients without FAIS, as well as the effect of these parameters on outcomes of arthroscopic treatment of FAIS. Purpose: To (1) identify differences in spinopelvic parameters between patients with FAIS versus controls without FAIS; (2) identify associations between spinopelvic parameters and preoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs); and (3) identify differences in PROs between patients with stiff spines (standing-sitting ΔSS ≤10°) versus those without. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: The study enrolled patients ≥18 years of age who underwent primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAIS with cam, pincer, or mixed (cam and pincer) morphology. Participants underwent preoperative standing-sitting imaging with a low-dose 3-dimensional radiography system and were matched on age and body mass index (BMI) to controls without FAIS who also underwent EOS imaging. Spinopelvic parameters measured on EOS films were compared between the FAIS and control groups. Patients with FAIS completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) before surgery and at 1-year follow-up. Outcome scores were compared between patients with stiff spines versus those without. Associations between spinopelvic parameters and baseline outcome scores were assessed with Pearson correlations. Continuous variables were compared with Student t test and/or Mann-Whitney U test, and categorical variables were compared with Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 50 patients with FAIS (26 men; 24 women; mean age, 36.1 ± 10.7 years; mean BMI, 25.6 ± 4.2) were matched to 30 controls without FAIS (13 men; 17 women; mean age, 36.6 ± 9.5 years; mean BMI, 26.7 ± 3.6). Age, sex, and BMI were not significantly different between the FAIS and control groups (P > .05). Standing PT was not significantly different between stiff and non-stiff cohorts (P = .73), but sitting PT in the FAIS group was more than double that of the control group (36.5° vs 15.0°; P < .001). Incidence of stiff spine was significantly higher in the FAIS group (62.0% vs 3.3%; P < .001). Among FAIS patients, those with stiff spines had a significantly higher prevalence of cam impingement, whereas those with non–stiff spines had a higher prevalence of mixed impingement (P = .04). No significant differences were seen in preoperative mHHS or NAHS scores or pre- to postoperative improvement in scores between FAIS patients with stiff spines versus those without (P > .05), but a greater sitting SS was found to be positively correlated with a higher baseline mHHS (r = 0.36; P = .02). Conclusion: Patients with FAIS were more likely to have a stiff spine (standing-sitting ΔSS ≤10°) compared with control participants without FAIS. FAIS patients with stiff spines were more likely to have isolated cam morphology than patient without stiff spines. Although sitting SS was positively correlated with baseline mHHS, no significant differences were seen in 1-year postoperative outcomes between FAIS patients with versus without stiff spine.

Outcome Scores and Survivorship of Patients Undergoing Primary Hip Arthroscopy With Borderline Hip Dysplasia: A Propensity-Matched Study With Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Background: Patients with borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) and concomitant femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) have demonstrated similar outcomes at short- and midterm follow-up compared with equivalent patients without dysplasia. However, comparisons between these groups at long-term follow-up have yet to be investigated. Purpose: To compare long-term clinical outcomes between patients with BHD undergoing primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS versus matched control patients without BHD. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: A retrospective cohort study was conducted on patients with BHD (lateral center-edge angle, 18°-25°) who underwent hip arthroscopy for FAIS between January 2012 and February 2013. Patients were propensity matched in a 1:3 ratio by age, sex, and body mass index to control patients without BHD who underwent primary hip arthroscopy. Groups were compared in terms of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) preoperatively and at 10 years postoperatively, including the Hip Outcome Score Activities of Daily Living subscale (HOS-ADL) and Sports subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score, 12-item International Hip Outcome Tool, visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Achievement rates for minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) were compared between groups. Kaplan-Meier survivorship curves were assessed between groups. Results: At a mean follow-up of 10.3 ± 0.3 years, 28 patients with BHD (20 women; age, 30.8 ± 10.8 years) were matched to 84 controls who underwent primary hip arthroscopy. Both groups significantly improved from preoperative assessment in all PRO measures at 10 years (P < .001 for all). PRO scores were similar between groups, aside from HOS-SS (BHD, 62.9 ± 31.9 vs controls, 80.1 ± 26.0; P = .030). Rates of MCID achievement were similar between groups for all PROs (HOS-ADL: BHD, 76.2% vs controls, 67.9%, P = .580; HOS-SS: BHD, 63.2% vs controls, 69.4%, P = .773; modified Harris Hip Score: BHD, 76.5% vs controls, 67.9%, P = .561; VAS pain: BHD, 75.0% vs controls, 91.7%, P = .110). Rates of PASS achievement were significantly lower in the BHD group for HOS-ADL (BHD, 39.1% vs controls, 77.4%; P = .002), HOS-SS (BHD, 45.5% vs controls, 84.7%; P = .001), and VAS pain (BHD, 50.0% vs controls, 78.5%; P = .015). No significant difference was found in the rate of subsequent reoperation on the index hip between groups. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis demonstrated comparable survivorship at long-term follow-up (P = .645). Conclusion: After primary hip arthroscopy, patients with BHD in the setting of FAIS had significantly improved PRO scores at 10-year follow-up, comparable with propensity-matched controls without BHD. Rates of MCID achievement were similar between groups, although patients with BHD had lower rates of PASS achievement. Patients with BHD had similar long-term hip arthroscopy survivorship compared with controls, with no significant difference in rates of revision hip arthroscopy or conversion to total hip arthroplasty.

Outcomes of Hip Arthroscopy in Patients with Systemic Inflammatory Diseases: A Matched Cohort 5-Year Follow-Up Study

The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a difference in hip survivorship rates and patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a 5-year follow-up after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) between patients with versus without systemic inflammatory diseases (SIDs). A retrospective single-surgeon matched cohort study of FAIS patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and had a minimum of a 5-year follow-up was conducted. Subjects with SIDs were matched at a ratio of 2:3 of age and body mass index (BMI) with respect to controls without SIDs. Subjects completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) prior to surgery and at a 2-year and 5-year follow-up. Survival distributions for time to reoperation and to total hip arthroplasty (THA) were compared between groups using the log-rank test. Fifteen subjects with SIDs (mean age 41.5 years) were matched with twenty-five controls (41.8 years). There were no significant differences in reoperation rates (SIDs 27% vs. controls 20%, p = 0.71) or THA conversion rates (SIDs 7% vs. controls 12%, p = 1.00) at the 5-year follow-up, nor were there differences in survival distributions for reoperations (p = 0.72) or THAs (p = 0.55). There were no significant differences in postoperative mHHS (SIDs 79.3 vs. controls 88.5, p = 0.09) or NAHS (SIDs 82.7 vs. controls 89.3, p = 0.77) by the 5-year follow-up. At the 5-year follow-up, FAIS patients with comorbid SIDs experienced a significant clinical improvement from hip arthroscopy that is comparable to that of FAIS patients without SIDs.

OA02 Hip pain in the young and active patient? Don’t forget FAI

OA02 Hip pain in the young and active patient? Don’t forget FAI

Global Acetabular Retroversion Is Not Associated With Differences in Outcomes After Primary Hip Arthroscopy Among Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: A Matched Cohort Study With Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

To compare hip survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after primary hip arthroscopy at 5-year follow-up between patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) with radiographic signs of global acetabular retroversion and those without. A retrospective matched-cohort study was conducted using a single-surgeon hip arthroscopy database. Patients were included if they underwent primary hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAIS, had preoperative hip x-rays, and had a minimum 5-year follow-up. Global retroversion was defined as the presence of ischial spine sign, posterior wall sign, and crossover sign on anteroposterior view. Patients with FAIS with global retroversion were matched 1:1 on age, sex, and body mass index to FAIS controls. The modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) and Non-Arthritic Hip Score (NAHS) were administered preoperatively and at follow-up. Hip survivorship and PROMs were compared between the 2 groups using the paired t test, Wilcoxon signed rank test, and/or Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test as appropriate. P values <.05 were considered significant. Thirty-eight patients with global retroversion (mean age 40.6 ± 10.8 years, 60.5% female) were matched to 38 controls (mean age 41.3 ± 13.6 years, 60.5% female). Reoperation rates were the same in both groups (5.3%). On average, both groups reported significant pre- to postoperative improvement in mHHS (P < .001) and NAHS (P < .001), and there was no significant intergroup differences in the change in mHHS (P= .86) or NAHS (P= .90). Achievement rates for the patient acceptable symptom state on the mHHS were higher among males compared to females (P= .04) in both the global retroversion group (93.3% vs 73.9%) and the control group (93.3% vs 73.9%). Patients with FAIS with and without global acetabular retroversion had no significant difference in outcomes after primary hip arthroscopy at a minimum 5-year minimum follow-up. Level III, retrospective comparative prognostic trial.

Patients aged 50-75years take longer to achieve the patient acceptable symptom state than patients aged 20-34years following primary hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

Though an increasing number of adults older than 50years are undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS), it is unclear how their timeline for functional outcome improvement compares to that of younger patients. The purpose of this study was to assess the impact of age on time to achieving the Minimum Clinically Important Difference (MCID), Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB), and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) following primary hip arthroscopy for FAIS. A retrospective comparative single-surgeon cohort study of primary hip arthroscopy patients with minimum 2-year follow-up was conducted. Age categories were 20-34years, 35-49years, and 50-75years. All subjects completed the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) prior to surgery and at 6-month, 1-year, and 2-year follow-up. MCID and SCB cutoffs were defined as pre-to-postoperative increases in mHHS by ≥ 8.2 and ≥ 19.8, respectively. PASS cutoff was set at postoperative mHHS ≥ 74. Time to achievement of each milestone was compared using interval-censored survival analysis. The effect of age was adjusted for Body Mass Index (BMI), sex, and labral repair technique using an interval-censored proportional hazards model. Two hundred eighty-five patients were included in the analysis with 115 (40.4%) aged 20-34years, 92 (32.3%) aged 35-49years, and 78 (27.4%) aged 50-75years. There were no significant differences between groups in time to achievement for the MCID (n.s.) or SCB (n.s.). However, patients in the oldest group had significantly longer time to PASS than those in the youngest group, both in the unadjusted analysis (p = 0.02) and after adjusting for BMI, sex, and labral repair technique (HR 0.68, 95% CI 0.48-0.96, p = 0.03). Achievement of the PASS, but not the MCID or SCB, is delayed among FAIS patients aged 50-75years who undergo primary hip arthroscopy compared to those aged 20-34years. Older FAIS patients should be counseled appropriately about their longer timeline to achieving hip function comparable to their younger counterparts. III.

Does Preoperative Activity Level Affect Postoperative Clinical Outcomes Following Hip Arthroscopy in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS) Patients?

When considering surgical treatment options, many patients who undergo hip arthroscopy value continuing active lifestyles. To address these concerns, the purpose of this study was to determine the effect of preoperative activity level on postoperative patient-reported outcomes (PROs) in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) patients following hip arthroscopy. Data was retrospectively reviewed for FAIS patients who received hip arthroscopy between 2016 and 2018. Patients were divided into active group and inactive group based on preoperative HOS-SSS scores. Preoperative active patients were 1:1 propensity-score matched to inactive patients based on age, sex, BMI, and follow-up period. PROs (HOS-ADL, HOS-ADL, iHOT-12, mHHS), VAS scores, radiographic measures, performed procedures, complications, and revision surgery were compared and analyzed for both groups by Student's t test. A total of 71 patients in the active group and 71 patients in the inactive group were found using propensity-score matching. Active patients had superior preoperative HOS-ADL, HOS-SSS, iHOT-12, mHHS (p < 0.001 for all), and VAS (p = 0.002) scores compared with inactive patients. At the final follow-up, active patients still had better PROs in HOS-ADL (p = 0.003), HOS-SSS (p < 0.001), iHOT-12 (p = 0.043), and mHHS scores (p = 0.003). There was no difference detected in postoperative VAS score (p = 0.117) between the two groups. However, inactive patients showed significantly higher net improvement in HOS-ADL (p = 0.009), HOS-SSS (p = 0.005), and iHOT-12 (p = 0.023). Active patients have absolute higher preoperative PROs and achieve better postoperative PROs than inactive patients. However, inactive patients can obtain greater net improvements in PROs following hip arthroscopic surgery, with comparable pain alleviation as active patients.

Arthroscopy Confers Excellent Clinical Outcomes in Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome (FAIS) Patients Aged 50 Years and Above.

Hip preservation surgery has expanded to include treatment of hip pathology in elderly patients. Most data on efficacy of arthroscopy treatment in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has been generated from Western populations, while studies in the older Asian FAIS population are lacking. Here, we report efficacy of hip arthroscopy for treatment of Asian patients aged 50 years and above. We retrospectively reviewed data from 775 hips that were treated arthroscopically for FAIS between 2016 and 2019. Patients with a history of hip surgery, contralateral surgery during the follow-up period, lateral center-edge angle (LCEA) <25°, Tӧnnis grade ≥2, and incomplete records were excluded. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), International Hip Outcome Tool 12-component form (iHOT-12), and Visual Analog Scale (VAS) were compared pre- and post-operation. We also recorded radiographic measures, intraoperative findings, procedures, complications, and subsequent surgical revisions. Finally, we correlated demographics with PRO improvement among the study group. A total of 57 hips met the inclusion and exclusion requirements and were therefore included in the final analysis. After the follow-up period (3.3 years), most patients exhibited significantly higher PROs than preoperative values, HOS-ADL (65.0-81.7), iHOT-12 (44.3-69.1), mHHS (58.9-81.7), and VAS (5.8-2.2; all p < 0.001). Shorter symptom duration was significantly correlated with improved HOS-ADL (p=0.015), and mHHS score (p=0.022). The overall rate of complications and rate of revisions were 5.3% and 7.0%, respectively, and none of the patients required total hip arthroplasty (THA). Arthroscopic surgery confers significant clinical outcomes in most FAIS patients in the Asian population who are aged 50 years and above. These benefits are accompanied by either a low revision rate or conversion to THA, while shorter symptom duration is positively correlated with improved HOS-ADL and mHHS scores.

Acetabular labrum and cartilage contact mechanics during pivoting and walking tasks in individuals with cam femoroacetabular impingement syndrome

Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a motion-related pathology of the hip characterized by pain, morphological abnormalities of the proximal femur, and an elevated risk of joint deterioration and hip osteoarthritis. Activities that require deep flexion are understood to induce impingement in cam FAIS patients, however, less demanding activities such as walking and pivoting may induce pain as well as alterations in kinematics and joint stability. Still, the paucity of quantitative descriptions of cam FAIS has hindered understanding underlying hip joint mechanics during such activities. Previous in silico studies have employed generalized model geometry or kinematics to simulate impingement between the femur and acetabulum, which may not accurately capture the interplay between morphology and motion. In this study, we utilized models with participant-specific bone and articular soft tissue anatomy and kinematics measured by dual-fluoroscopy to compare hip contact mechanics of cam FAIS patients to controls during four activities of daily living (internal/external pivoting and level/incline walking). Averaged across the gait cycle during incline walking, patients displayed increased strain in the anterior joint (labrum strain: p-value = 0.038, patients: 11.7 ± 6.7 %, controls: 5.0 ± 3.6 %; cartilage strain: p-value = 0.029, patients: 9.1 ± 3.3 %, controls: 4.2 ± 2.3). Patients also exhibited increased average anterior cartilage strains during external pivoting (p-value = 0.039; patients: 13.0 ± 9.2 %, controls: 3.9 ± 3.2 %]). No significant differences between patient and control contact area and strain were found for level walking and internal pivoting. Our study provides new insights into the biomechanics of cam FAIS, including spatiotemporal hip joint contact mechanics during activities of daily living.

Differences in hip torque ratios between individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and asymptomatic individuals: A cross-sectional study

BackgroundHip torque ratios are considered a useful measure for patients with hip pain. However, evidence regarding this measure for patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is scarce. The primary aim of this study was to compare hip external-internal rotation and abduction-adduction torque ratios between patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and asymptomatic individuals. The secondary aim was to compare hip torque ratios between the asymptomatic group and femoroacetabular impingement syndrome patients grouped according to the severity of symptoms and functional limitations. MethodsHip abduction-adduction and external-internal rotation torque ratios of 134 individuals with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and 134 asymptomatic matched controls was assessed through isokinetic testing. Severity of symptoms and functional limitations was assessed through the iHOT-33. Mann Whitney U and Kruskall-Wallis tests were used to compare hip torque ratios between asymptomatic individuals and patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and to patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome with different severities of symptoms and functional limitations. FindingsNo differences were identified in hip abduction-adduction (U = 7659.5, p = 0.192) and external-internal rotation (U = 8787.5, p = 0.764) torque ratios between patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and asymptomatic individuals. Hip abduction-adduction torque ratio was higher (p = 0.0127) in patients with a severe state (median = 1.80, IQR = 0.61) when compared to asymptomatic individuals (median = 1.52, IQR = 0.45) (moderate effect size, r = 0.45). InterpretationPatients with severe symptoms and functional limitations related to FAI syndrome presented greater hip abduction-adduction torque ratio than asymptomatic individuals, suggesting a decreased adduction torque capacity relative to abduction torque in this subgroup of femoroacetabular impingement.

Mid-term outcomes of exercise therapy for the non-surgical management of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: are short-term effects persisting?

ObjectivesTo investigate the mid-term outcomes of exercise therapy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). DesignFollow-up study. SettingClinical setting. ParticipantsTwenty-six patients with FAIS who completed a 12-week semi-standardized, progressive exercise therapy program. Main outcome measuresAt a mid-term follow-up of 4.6 years, therapy outcome was assessed using (i) the Global Treatment Outcome questionnaire for hip pain, (ii) the Hip Outcome Score (HOS) for hip pain and function in activities of daily living (ADL) and Sport and (iii) the Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS) for sport activity level. Mid-term outcomes were compared to pre-symptomatic, pre-therapy, as well as to short-term follow ups (18 weeks). ResultsIn patients who completed the exercise program and did not undergo hip surgery (N = 19), mid-term HOS ADL and HOS Sport (P = 0.002) were higher than pre-therapy, and comparable to the 18-week follow-up. Mid-term HSAS was lower than the pre-symptomatic status (P = 0.022), but comparable to the 18-week follow-up. ConclusionAt a mid-term follow-up of 4.6 years, FAIS patients with no subsequent hip surgery maintained the good exercise therapy outcomes and the level of sport activity achieved at short term.

The Presence of Central Acetabular Osteophytes May Negatively Affect the Outcome After Primary Arthroscopic Therapy of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

To compare short-term follow-up outcomes after primary arthroscopy in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) patients with untreated central acetabular osteophytes (CAO) to a control group without CAO. A retrospective analysis was performed using data from FAIS patients who had primary arthroscopy between 2017 and 2018. The presence of CAO was confirmed arthroscopically, and there were 2 groups created. The CAO group was 1:1 propensity-score matched to a control group (without CAO) based on age, gender, body mass index (BMI), Tӧnnis grade, symptom duration before surgery, and follow-up time. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs), such as the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), International Hip Outcome Tool 12-component form (iHOT-12)，modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and visual analog scale (VAS) scores were used to evaluate the level of function included. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) were also calculated to determine meaningful outcome improvement. Radiographic measures, performed procedures, complications, and revision surgery were also compared and analyzed for both groups. P values less than .05 were considered statistically significant. A total of 46 hips with CAO and 46 hips without CAO were propensity matched. At the minimum final follow-up of 2 years, the CAO group had significantly lower HOS-ADL (78.8 vs 85.5; P= .008), iHOT-12 (74.8 vs 79.3; P= .019), and mHHS (78.9 vs 87.2; P= .002) scores, as compared to the CAO group. Furthermore, patients in the CAO group were significantly less likely to achieve the MCID and PASS for the mHHS score (78.3% vs 93.5%; P=.036, 58.7% vs 78.2%; P= .043, respectively). There was no change in the rate of complications (4.3% vs 0%) and revision hip arthroscopy (4.3% vs 2.2%) between the two groups at the final follow-up. This study demonstrated that surgically treated FAIS patients with CAO might experience worse short-term, patient-reported outcomes, as compared with propensity-matched patients without CAO. III, case-control study.

Dynamic Assessment of Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome Hips

The purpose of our study was to compare lower extremity rotational kinematics and kinetics (angles, torques, and powers) and hip muscle electromyography (EMG) activity between cam-type femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and age- and sex-matched controls during walking, fast walking, stair ascent, stair descent, and sit-to-stand. This study included 10 males with unilateral FAIS and 10 control males with no FAIS. We measured kinematics, kinetics, and electromyographic signals during stair ascent/descent, sit-to-stand, self-selected walk, and fast walk. Peak signal differences between groups were compared with independent t-tests with statistical significance when P < .05. FAIS hips showed significant differences compared to controls, including increased hip flexion during walking (+4.9°, P= .048) and stair ascent (+7.8°, P=.003); diminished trunk rotation during stair ascent (-3.4°; P= .015), increased knee flexion during self-selected walking (+5.1°, P= .009), stair ascent (+7.4°, P= .001), and descent (+5.3°, P= .038); and increased knee valgus during fast walking (+4.7°, P= .038). gMed and MedHam showed significantly decreased activation in FAIS during walking (gMed:-12.9%, P= .002; MedHam:-7.4%, P= .028) and stair ascent (gMed:-16.7%, P= .036; MedHam:-13.0%, P= .041); decreased gMed activation during sit-to-stand (-8.8%, P=.004) and decreased MedHam activation during stair descent (-8.0%, P= .039). Three-dimensional motion analysis and EMG evaluation of functional kinematics and kinetics in subjects with symptomatic unilateral cam-type FAIS across a spectrum of provocative tasks demonstrated significant differences compared to controls in hip flexion, trunk rotation, knee flexion, and valgus. FAIS hips had significantly decreased gMed and MedHam activity. These findings may explain altered torso-pelvic, hip, and knee mechanics in FAIS patients and suggest that evaluation of FAIS should include the patient's hip, knee, and torso-pelvic relationships and muscle function. The clinical and functional manifestation of FAIS hip pathomechanics is not entirely understood, and previous literature to date has not clearly described the alterations in gait and functional movements seen in patients with cam-type FAIS. The current study used 3D motion analysis and EMG evaluation of functional kinematics and kinetics to identify a number of differences between FAIS and control hips, which help us better understand the lower extremity kinematics and kinetics and muscle activation in FAIS.

The 2019 International Society of Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on assessment and treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS): an international consensus statement.

The 2019 International Society of Hip Preservation (ISHA) physiotherapy agreement on femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) was intended to build an international physiotherapy consensus on the assessment, non-surgical physiotherapy treatment, pre-/post-operative management, and return to sport decisions for those patients with FAIS. The panel consisted of 11 physiotherapists and 8 orthopaedic surgeons. There is limited evidence regarding the use of physiotherapy in the overall management of those with FAIS. Therefore, a group of ISHA member physiotherapists, who treat large numbers of FAIS patients and have extensive experience in this area, constructed a consensus statement to guide physiotherapy-related decisions in the overall management of those with FAIS. The consensus was conducted using a modified Delphi technique. Six major topics were the focus of the consensus statement: (i) hip assessment, (ii) non-surgical physiotherapy management, (iii) pre-habilitation prior to hip arthroscopy, (iv) post-operative physiotherapy rehabilitation, (v) stages of post-operative rehabilitation and (vi) return to sports criteria/guidelines after surgery.

Capsular closure in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS): results of a matched-cohort study from the Danish hip arthroscopy registry.

Capsular closure in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) patients during hip arthroscopy procedures is debated. The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) contains data to perform matched-cohort analyses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate 1-year subjective outcome data from DHAR after hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular closure and compare these outcome data with a matched-cohort study group. The primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) subjective outcome between patients with and without capsular closure. This is a retrospective cohort study (level of evidence, 3). FAIS patients eligible for hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and December 2017, and where the interportal capsulotomy was closed, were identified and matched with patients without capsular closure. Matching criteria were gender (1:1), age (±5 years), degree of cartilage injury: ICRS and modified Becks grade (±1 grade) and radiological parameters: lateral center edge angle and alpha angle (±10°). A comparison between cohorts regarding differences in patient outcome scores, HAGOS, Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D) and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain at 1-year follow-up were performed. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative subjective outcome scores, level of statistical significance was 0.05. A total of 189 patients were included in the capsular closure group and matched with 189 control patients. The mean age in years (±standard deviation) was 39.4 (±11.8) and 39.3 (±11.2), respectively, 55% females. Both groups improved significantly at 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in the capsular closure group were found in HSAS, EQ-5D, NRS pain (rest and walk) and most HAGOS subscales compared with the non-closure group. All patients underwent labral repair in combination with both femoral osteochondroplasty and acetabuloplasty. The revision rate reported after 2 years was 6.8% in the non-closure group and 3.5% in the closure group. One patient in each cohort received a total hip replacement after 2 years. Capsular closure during arthroscopic FAIS treatment resulted in better subjective outcomes and less pain during rest and walking compared with matched controls. Both groups demonstrated improved outcome at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, capsular closure might result in a lower risk of a revision hip arthroscopy.

Clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) are inferior compared to primary procedures. Results from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR).

As many as 10% of primary hip arthroscopies end up with a revision arthroscopy procedure when treating patients suffering from femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). In general, revision procedures are indicated because of residual impingement, but only a few studies present outcome data from revision hip arthroscopy after failed FAIS surgical treatment. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical outcomes after revision hip arthroscopy in a FAIS cohort and compare outcomes with a primary FAIS hip arthroscopy cohort and describe potential causes of failure after the primary hip arthroscopy. It was hypothesized that subjective outcomes improve after revision hip arthroscopy although outcomes were expected to be inferior to primary hip arthroscopic outcomes. Three-hundred and thirty-one arthroscopic revision hip FAIS patients were included from the Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR). Patient-related outcome measures (PROM's), Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Scores (HAGOS), Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EQ-5D and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain, were assessed in the study cohort prior to the primary procedure and at revision and at follow-up one year after the revision procedure. These data were compared with 4154 primary hip arthroscopic FAIS patients. One-year after revision surgery, mean follow-up (in months ± SD): 12.3 ± 1.6, significant improvements (p < 0.05) in all PROMs was demonstrated, but FAIS patients in the primary hip arthroscopic cohort demonstrated significantly higher outcomes, in all PROMs, when compared at one-year follow-up. Scar tissue, residual osseous impingement and insufficient healing of the labral repair were reported as the main reasons for revision surgery. The conversion to total hip arthroplasty was low (6.4%). Revision hip arthroscopy in FAIS patients improves subjective outcomes significantly, although they are poorer than after primary FAIS hip arthroscopy. Main reasons for revision arthroscopy was scar tissue, residual femoroacetabular impingement and insufficient healing of labral repair. Level III.

Reporting Clinical Significance in Hip Arthroscopy: Where Are We Now?

Although p values are standard for reporting statistical significance of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), the shift toward clinically important outcome values, including minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and substantial clinical benefit (SCB), necessitates re-evaluation of the current literature. We sought to answer two questions regarding studies on primary hip arthroscopy performed for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). (1) Do such studies reporting statistical significance on common PROMs meet published MCID/SCB thresholds? (2) What proportion of such studies report both statistical and clinical significance? We identified four papers published in two journals defining MCID/SCB values on the modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sport (HOS-Sport), international Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT-33), and its short version (iHOT-12) for different groups of FAIS patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. We reviewed these two journals from the dates of publication to the present to identify papers reporting changes in post-operative PROMs. The difference in pre- and post-operative scores on each PROM was calculated and compared to MCID/SCB thresholds. Twelve studies were included. Ten studies (83%) evaluated mHHS (90% met MCID, 50% met SCB), seven (58%) evaluated HOS-ADL (100% met MCID/SCB) and HOS-Sport (100% met MCID, 57% met SCB), and one (8%) evaluated iHOT-33 (met MCID/SCB) and iHOT-12 (met MCID). Most studies met MCID and SCB at both 1- and 2-year timepoints. Of the studies evaluated, 50% reported clinical relevance. Nearly all studies evaluated met MCID, while fewer met SCB. Only half discussed these clinical measures. It is proposed that all future studies report both statistical and clinical significance as standard best practice.

Squat and gait biomechanics 6 months following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

The purpose of this study was to (i) assess whether squat and gait biomechanical measures improve in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) 6 months after surgery compared to pre-operative measures and (ii) compare biomechanical properties to controls without FAIS. In this prospective study, biomechanical data during a double leg squat task and gait for 15 FAIS patients and 9 controls were collected using three-dimensional motion analysis. Data were collected in the FAIS group at two-time points, pre-operatively and 6-month post-operatively following arthroscopic hip surgery, and at a single time point for the healthy controls. Independent sample’s t-test were used to compare the FAIS group to the controls, and paired samples t-test were used to determine within-group differences before and after hip arthroscopy in the FAIS group. The results indicated that there were significant within-group increases for sagittal plane moment rate during the double leg squat task (P = 0.009) between the pre-operative and post-operative time points for the FAIS group. Between-group differences showed that FAIS patients pre-operatively exhibit slower squat velocities during the descent (P = 0.005) and ascent phase (P = 0.012) of a double leg squat when compared healthy controls. Reduced hip external rotation moments during gait (P = 0.02) were also found between FAIS patients pre-operatively and controls. In conclusion, alterations in hip biomechanics are present before surgery for FAIS when compared to healthy controls, and joint mechanics change 6 months after surgery. However, the biomechanical differences during a double leg squat and gait were minimal.

Preoperative Duration of Symptoms Is Associated With Outcomes 5 Years After Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome

To determine the effect of the preoperative duration of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS)-associated symptoms on clinical outcomes at a minimum of 5 years after hip arthroscopy. We identified FAIS patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and January 2014 with a minimum of 5 years' follow-up. Patient demographic characteristics and clinical outcomes, comprising the Hip Outcome Score-Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score-Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), pain score, and satisfaction score, were analyzed. The minimal clinically important difference, patient acceptable symptomatic state, and substantial clinical benefit were calculated. Patients were stratified based on the preoperative duration of symptoms: less than 2 years versus 2 years or longer. Multivariate regressions were constructed to determine the association between the preoperative symptom duration and clinical outcomes at 5 years after hip arthroscopy. A total of 310 patients were included with a mean age (±standard deviation) of 34.1 ± 11.9 years and body mass index of 25.3 ± 5.1. The study group showed statistically significant improvements in the HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS, pain score, and satisfaction score (P < .001 for all). A preoperative duration of symptoms of 2 or more years was an independent predictor of worse HOS-ADL, HOS-SS, mHHS, and pain score (P < .05 for all). Furthermore, a longer duration of symptoms was associated with a lower likelihood of achieving the minimal clinically important difference for the HOS-ADL (odds ratio [OR], 0.53; P= .037), HOS-SS (OR, 0.38; P= .003), and mHHS (OR, 0.43; P= .009); the patient acceptable symptomatic state for the HOS-SS (OR, 0.44; P= .006) and mHHS (OR, 0.46; P= .006) but not the HOS-ADL despite trending toward significance (OR, 0.59; P= .098); and substantial clinical benefit for the HOS-ADL (OR, 0.50; P=.011), HOS-SS (OR, 0.52; P= .020), and mHHS (OR, 0.47; P= .007). Patients with a preoperative duration of FAIS-associated symptoms of 2 or more years prior to hip arthroscopy experience inferior outcomes and a lower frequency of clinically significant outcome improvement than patients with a shorter duration of symptoms at medium-to long-term follow-up. Level III, retrospective comparative trial.