Femoral Osteochondroplasty Research Articles

The incidence of subsequent hip arthroscopy after rectus-sparing periacetabular osteotomy.

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. There remains a lack of consensus regarding whether intra-articular procedures such as labral repair or improvement of femoral offset should be performed at the time of PAO or addressed subsequent to PAO if symptoms warrant. The purpose was to determine the rate of subsequent hip arthroscopy (HA) in a contemporary cohort of patients, who underwent PAO in isolation without any intra-articular procedures. From June 2012 to March 2022, 349 rectus-sparing PAOs were performed and followed for a minimum of one year (mean 6.2 years (1 to 11)). The mean age was 24 years (14 to 46) and 88.8% were female (n = 310). Patients were evaluated at final follow-up for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Clinical records were reviewed for complications or subsequent surgery. Radiographs were reviewed for the following acetabular parameters: lateral centre-edge angle, anterior centre-edge angle, acetabular index, and the alpha-angle (AA). Patients were cross-referenced from the two largest hospital systems in our area to determine if subsequent HA was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze risk factors for HA. A total of 16 hips (15 patients; 4.6%) underwent subsequent HA with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty, the most common interventions. For those with a minimum of two years of follow-up, 5.3% (n = 14) underwent subsequent HA. No hips underwent total hip arthroplasty and one revision PAO was performed. Overall, 17 hips (4.9%) experienced a complication and 99 (26.9%) underwent hardware removal. All PROMs improved significantly postoperatively. Radiologically, 80% of hips (n = 279) reached the goal for acetabular correction (77% for acetbular index and 93% for LCEA), with no significant differences between those who underwent subsequent HA and those who did not. Rectus-sparing PAO is associated with a low rate of subsequent HA for intra-articular pathology at a mean of 6.2 years' follow-up (1 to 11). Acetabular correction alone may be sufficient as the primary intervention for the majority of patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Arthroscopic Hip Capsular Reconstruction: A Step-by-Step Guide With Rectus Overlay

The hip capsule is the primary stabilizer of the hip joint. At the time of hip arthroscopy, the capsule is disrupted to obtain intra-articular access and proper joint visualization. With the number of patients undergoing primary and revision hip arthroscopy continuing to increase, it is not uncommon for surgeons to encounter patients with iatrogenic capsular deficiency from prior hip arthroscopy. In cases where substantial capsular defects beyond the scope of capsular repair are visualized, reconstruction may be required to obtain satisfactory closure and restore hip stability. We present a step-by-step workflow for efficient hip capsular reconstruction with rectus overlay while allowing for facile incorporation of other revision procedures such as labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty.

Hip Arthroscopic Surgery With Chondrolabral Refixation, Osteochondroplasty, and Routine Capsular Closure for Femoroacetabular Impingement Syndrome: Clinical Outcomes at a Minimum 10-Year Follow-up

Background: Hip arthroscopic surgery for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) has proven to be an effective surgical intervention, with high rates of return to sport and work as well as favorable outcomes at short- and midterm follow-up. However, limited data exist on outcomes at long-term follow-up. Purpose: To evaluate patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at a minimum 10-year follow-up after primary hip arthroscopic surgery including labral repair, femoral osteochondroplasty, acetabular osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure for FAIS. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS between June 2012 and January 2013 were identified. PROs were collected preoperatively and at a minimum of 10 years postoperatively, including the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living (HOS-ADL), Hip Outcome Score–Sports Subscale (HOS-SS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), International Hip Outcome Tool–12 (iHOT-12), and visual analog scale (VAS) for pain and satisfaction. Unique minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and patient acceptable symptom state (PASS) thresholds were calculated, and their rates of achievement were analyzed. An alpha level of <.05 was used to determine statistical significance. Results: A total of 94 patients (55 female; mean age, 34.3 ± 12.4 years) were analyzed with a mean follow-up of 10.1 ± 0.3 years (range, 10.0-10.7 years). Patients demonstrated significant 10-year improvement across all PRO measures (P < .001). MCID and PASS thresholds were calculated as follows: HOS-ADL (10.4 and 85.3, respectively), HOS-SS (14.6 and 60.2, respectively), mHHS (8.8 and 76.0, respectively), VAS pain (14.6 and 27.5, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 71.4). The majority of patients achieved the MCID and PASS for each PRO measure: HOS-ADL (73.4% and 70.9%, respectively), HOS-SS (78.5% and 77.2%, respectively), mHHS (81.0% and 70.9%, respectively), VAS pain (88.6% and 70.9%, respectively), and iHOT-12 (PASS: 73.4%). Overall, 9 patients (9.6%) underwent subsequent revision hip arthroscopic surgery at a mean 4.9 ± 3.7 years (range, 1.1-10.1 years) postoperatively, and 6 patients (6.4%) underwent conversion to total hip arthroplasty at a mean 4.1 ± 3.1 years (range, 0.9-9.3 years) postoperatively. Conclusion: Patients who underwent primary hip arthroscopic surgery for FAIS utilizing contemporary methods of labral repair, acetabular and/or femoral osteochondroplasty, and capsular closure commonly experienced sustained clinical improvement and reported high levels of satisfaction at a minimum 10-year follow-up with low rates of reoperation.

Poster 230: Improved Mid-Term Outcomes in Patients with Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis Related Femoroacetabular Impingement

Objectives: Slipped Capital Femoral Epiphysis (SCFE) of the hip is a potentially devastating injury that can occur in the developing hip. In-situ pinning is considered the current standard of care; however, even with prompt surgical fixation, there remains a risk of post-operative disability as a result of metaphyseal CAM deformity. This deformity can lead to subsequent femoroacetabular impingement resulting in labral and articular cartilage damage. Hip arthroscopy with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty has increasingly been utilized in these patients to correct the underlying deformity and improve hip mechanics. Short-term follow-up has demonstrated excellent outcomes in patients treated for SCFE with subsequent hip arthroscopy. Mid-term follow-up of these patients is sparse and limited to studies with small sample sizes. These studies primarily evaluate radiographic and physical examination findings rather than patient reported outcomes (PROs). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the mid-term clinical and functional patient reported outcomes of a large population of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy after SCFE in-situ fixation. Methods: SCFE patients that underwent subsequent hip arthroscopy for FAI were recruited for this prospective study. Patients were recruited from a single surgeon practice. Patients were sent a survey which included a single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) prompt, subjective Likert-style questions assessing disability and satisfaction, and PROMIS Physical Function and iHOT-12 questionnaires. Patient charts were retrospectively reviewed for patient demographics, visual analogue scale (VAS) pain scores, and a modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS) from the post-pinning and pre-arthroscopy period. Descriptive statistics were utilized to assess overall patient outcomes. Results: In total, forty patients met inclusion criteria and thirty-three completed the mid-term follow up survey for an 82.5% response rate. Mean age at the time of arthroscopy was 18.5 years and mean duration of follow up was 5.85 years (Table 1). Patient subjective outcomes are reported in Table 2; notably, 33 of 33 patients (100%) were neutral, satisfied, or very satisfied with surgery. No patients reported that if given the choice again, they would choose to not have surgery. mHHS pre-operatively was 67.43, which was interpreted as poor functional status. Mean mid-term follow-up PROMIS-PF t- score was 51.19, indicating that the functional status of the included patients was at or above the average functional status of the overall population. Mean VAS pain score at rest was 4.78 pre- operatively and 1.94 at mid-term follow up. The average post-operative iHOT-12 score was 65.64 (Table 3) Conclusions: The results of the first mid-term, large-sample sized comprehensive follow-up of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy following surgical pinning of SCFE demonstrate that these patients have excellent functional and clinical outcomes. Subjectively, these patients report improved satisfaction with the operation and overall improvement in functional status. Objectively, the studied patients are performing at the level of the average non-surgical population as measured by PRO scoring systems. These findings suggest that the excellent outcomes reported at short-term follow-up persist at mid-term follow-up. This study demonstrates that hip arthroscopy for FAI in the setting of a prior in-situ pinning of a SCFE is a viable surgical treatment and reliably improves patient’s pain and physical function at mid- term follow up. [Table: see text][Table: see text][Table: see text]

THE INCIDENCE OF SUBSEQUENT HIP ARTHROSCOPY AFTER RECTUS-SPARING PERIACETABULAR OSTEOTOMY: SHOULD WE BE LOOKING IN THE JOINT?

Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the preferred treatment for symptomatic acetabular dysplasia in adolescents and young adults. There remains a lack of consensus regarding whether intra-articular work such as labral repair or improvement of femoral offset should be performed at the time of PAO or addressed subsequent to PAO if symptoms warrant. The purpose was to determine the rate of subsequent hip arthroscopy (HA) in a contemporary PAO cohort with no intra-articular work performed at the time of PAO.From June 2012 to March 2022, 368 rectus sparing PAOs were performed and followed for a minimum of one year (mean 5.9 years). The average age was 24 (range 14–46) and 89% were female. Patients were evaluated at last follow-up for patient-reported outcomes (PROMs). Clinical records were reviewed for complications or subsequent surgery. Radiographs were reviewed for the following acetabular parameters: LCEA, ACEA, AI, and the alpha-angle (AA). Patients were cross-referenced from the two largest hospital systems in our area to determine if subsequent HA was performed. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze risk factors for HA.16 hips (15 patients) (4.4%) underwent subsequent HA with labral repair and femoral osteochondroplasty most common. For those with a minimum of two years of follow-up, 5.3% underwent subsequent HA. No hips underwent THA; one revision PAO was performed. 14 hips experienced a complication and 99 underwent hardware removal. All PROMs improved significantly post-operatively. Radiographically 80% of hips were in goal for acetabular correction parameters with no significant differences between those who underwent subsequent HA and those who did not.Rectus sparing PAO is associated with a low rate of subsequent HA for intra-articular pathology at 5-year follow-up. Acetabular correction alone may be sufficient as the primary intervention for the majority of patients with symptomatic acetabular dysplasia.

Femoral Head Vascularity After Arthroscopic Femoral Osteochondroplasty: An In Vivo Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Study.

A serious concern with surgical procedures around the hip joint is iatrogenic injury of the arterial supply to the femoral head (FH) and consequent development of FH osteonecrosis. Cam-type morphology can extend to the posterosuperior area. Understanding the limit of the posterior superior extension of the femoral osteochondroplasty is paramount to avoid underresection and residual impingement while maintaining FH vascularity. The aim of this study was to quantify the impact of arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty on the FH vascular supply. It was hypothesized that keeping the superior extension of the resection zone anterior to the 12-o'clock position would maintain FH vascularity. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Ten adult patients undergoing arthroscopic femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) surgery were included in the study. Computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained before and after arthroscopic osteochondroplasty to define the extension of resection margins. To quantify FH vascularity, postoperative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) was obtained at 2 time points: immediately after surgery and at the 3-month follow-up. Custom MRI analysis software was used to quantify perfusion. CT scan analysis demonstrated that the superior resection margin was maintained anterior to the 12-o'clock position in half of the patients. The remining 5 patients had a mean posterior extension of 11.4° ± 7.5°. The immediate postoperative DCE-MRI revealed diminished venous outflow in the operative side but no difference in overall FH perfusion. At the 3-month follow-up DCE-MRI, there was no perfusion difference between the operative and nonoperative FHs. This study provides previously unreported quantitative MRI data on in vivo perfusion of the FH after the commonly performed arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty for the treatment of cam-type FAI. Maintaining resection margins anterior to the 12-o'clock position, or even 10° posteriorly, was not observed to impair perfusion to the FH.

Hip arthroscopy after periacetabular osteotomy for acetabular dysplasia – incidence and clinical outcome

BackgroundThe periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is the treatment of choice for acetabular dysplasia and has demonstrated improvement in patient reported outcomes measures (PROMs) as well as acceptable long-term survival. However, acetabular dysplasia is also associated with intra-articular lesions that can negatively impact clinical outcome. This study aimed to analyse the incidence, operative findings, and outcomes of hip arthroscopy after PAO.MethodsThis is a single center retrospective study by querying our hip preservation prospectively collected database from 2006 to 2020. All patients having undergone hip arthroscopy after a PAO, with a minimal follow-up of one year, were identified. 202 PAOs were done with a mean age of 28.3 years (12.7 – 53.6) including 39 males and 167 females. Failure was defined as conversion to hip replacement. Demographics, surgical findings, reoperations, and PROMs (pre and post operatively at the last follow-up point only for hips not converted to hip replacement).ResultsFifteen hips in 15 patients (7.4%) out of 202 PAOs underwent a hip arthroscopy at a mean time of 3.9 years (0.3–10.3) after PAO. There were 2 males, 13 females and the mean age was 29.8 years (18.5–45). 12 hips had no radiological osteoarthritis (Tönnis 0) and 3 hips had early osteoarthritis (Tönnis 1). At time of arthroscopy, all hips had a labral tear, 9 had a chondral damage ≥ Beck 4. Eight hips had labral debridement, 7 had labral repair, 2 had resection of adhesions and 4 underwent a femoral osteochondroplasty. Four hips (27%) were converted to a hip replacement at a mean time of 1.8 years(0.5–3.2) after hip arthroscopy. Patients converted to hip replacement were significantly older (p = 0.01), had a lower post-PAO LCEA (p = 0.01) and a higher post-PAO Tönnis angle (p = 0.02). There were no significant improvements in PROMs.ConclusionThis study reports a hip arthroscopy reoperation rate after PAO of 7.4%. All three types of dysplasia (uncovered anteriorly, posteriorly, or globally) were present in this cohort. Twenty seven percent of patients were converted to hip replacement and PROMs were not significantly improved by hip arthroscopy. Therefore, this procedure should be approached with some caution.

Effect of modeling femoral version and head-neck offset correction on computed contact mechanics in dysplastic hips treated with periacetabular osteotomy

While correction of dysplastic acetabular deformity has been a focus of both clinical treatment and research, concurrent femoral deformities have only more recently received serious attention. The purpose of this study was to determine how including abnormalities in femoral head-neck offset and femoral version alter computationally derived contact stresses in patients with combined dysplasia and femoroacetabular impingement (FAI). Hip models with patient-specific bony anatomy were created from preoperative and postoperative CT scans of 20 hips treated with periacetabular osteotomy and femoral osteochondroplasty. To simulate performing only a PAO, a third model was created combining each patient’s postoperative pelvis and preoperative femur geometry. These three models were initialized with the femur in two starting orientations: (1) standardized template orientation, and (2) using patient-specific anatomic landmarks. Hip contact stresses were computed in all 6 model sets during an average dysplastic gait cycle, an average FAI gait cycle, and an average stand-to-sit activity using discrete element analysis. No significant differences in peak contact stress (p = 0.190 to 1), mean contact stress (p = 0.273 to 1), or mean contact area (p = 0.050 to 1) were identified during any loading activity based on femoral alignment technique or inclusion of femoral osteochondroplasty. These findings suggest that presence of abnormal femoral version and/or head-neck offset deformities are not themselves predominant factors in intra-articular contact mechanics during gait and stand-to-sit activities. Inclusion of modified movement patterns caused by these femoral deformities may be necessary for models to adequately capture the mechanical effects of these clinically recognized risk factors for negative outcomes.

Three-Dimensional Quantification of Cam Resection Using MRI Bone Models: A Comparison of 2 Techniques.

Background:The current clinical standard for the evaluation of cam deformity in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome is based on radiographic measurements, which limit the ability to quantify the complex 3-dimensional (3D) morphology of the proximal femur.Purpose:To compare magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–based metrics for the quantification of cam resection as derived using a best-fit sphere alpha angle (BFS-AA) method and using 3D preoperative-postoperative surface model subtraction (PP-SMS).Study Design:Descriptive laboratory study.Methods:Seven cadaveric hemipelvises underwent 1.5-T MRI before and after arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty, and 3D bone models of the proximal femur were reconstructed from the MRI scans. The alpha angles were measured radially along clockfaces using a BFS-AA method from the literature and plotted as continuous curves for the pre- and postoperative models. The difference between the areas under the curve for the pre- and postoperative models was then introduced in the current study as the BFS-AA–based metric to quantify the cam resection. The cam resection was also quantified using a 3D PP-SMS method, previously described in the literature using the metrics of surface area (FSA), volume (FV), and height (maximum [FHmax] and mean [FHmean]). Bivariate correlation analyses were performed to compare the metrics quantifying the cam resection as derived from the BFS-AA and PP-SMS methods.Results:The mean ± standard deviation maximum pre- and postoperative alpha angle measurements were 59.73° ± 15.38° and 48.02° ± 13.14°, respectively. The mean for each metric quantifying the cam resection with the PP-SMS method was as follows: FSA, 540.9 ± 150.7 mm2; FV, 1019.2 ± 486.2 mm3; FHmax , 3.6 ± 1.0 mm; and FHmean, 1.8 ± 0.5 mm. Bivariate correlations between the BFS-AA–based and PP-SMS–based metrics were strong: FSA (r = 0.817, P = .012), FV (r = 0.888, P = .004), FHmax (r = 0.786, P = .018), and FHmean (r = 0.679, P = .047).Conclusion:Strong positive correlations were appreciated between the BFS-AA and PP-SMS methods quantifying the cam resection.Clinical Relevance:The utility of the BFS-AA technique is primarily during preoperative planning. The utility of the PP-SMS technique is in the postoperative setting when evaluating the adequacy of resection or in patients with persistent hip pain with suspected residual impingement. In combination, the techniques allow surgeons to develop a planned resection while providing a means to evaluate the depth of resection postoperatively.

Outcomes of Arthroscopic Decompression of the Anterior Inferior Iliac Spine: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Anterior inferior iliac spine (AIIS) impingement has been increasingly recognized as a source of extra-articular impingement and hip pain. However, no aggregate data analysis of patient outcomes after AIIS decompression has been performed. Purpose: To evaluate outcomes after arthroscopic AIIS decompression. Study Design: Meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A systematic review was performed according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were queried for all English-language studies reporting outcomes of arthroscopic AIIS decompression performed in isolation or in conjunction with hip impingement correction surgery. After screening, 10 articles were included. The indications for AIIS decompression were recorded, and weighted mean improvements in patient-reported outcome (PRO) scores, complication rates, and revision rates were calculated. Results: A total of 547 patients (311 women; 57%) were identified, with a total of 620 operative hips. The mean age was 28.42 ± 5.6 years, and the mean follow-up was 25.22 ± 11.1 months. A total of 529 hips (85%) underwent AIIS decompression, 530 hips (85%) underwent femoral osteochondroplasty, and 458 hips (74%) underwent labral repair. Of the patients, 13% underwent bilateral AIIS decompression. The mean modified Harris Hip Score improved from 61.3 ± 6.9 to 88.7 ± 4.7 postoperatively (change, 27.4 ± 5.7 points; P < .001), the Hip Outcome Score–Activities of Daily Living improved from 67.2 ± 10.6 to 91.1 ± 3.2 postoperatively (change, 24.0 ± 8.0 points; P = .001), and the Hip Outcome Score–Sports Specific Subscale improved from 36.8 ± 19.2 to 82.8 ± 3.8 postoperatively (change, 46.0 ± 18.2 points; P = .002). The pooled risk of postoperative complications was 1.1% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.1%), and the pooled risk of needing revision surgery was 1.0% (95% CI, 0.1%-2.0%). No complication was directly attributed to the AIIS decompression portion of the procedure. Conclusion: PROs improved significantly after hip arthroscopy with AIIS decompression, with a low risk of postoperative complications and subsequent revision surgeries. Failure to identify extra-articular sources of hip pain in outcomes of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome, including from the AIIS, could lead to poorer outcomes and future revision surgery.

Postoperative Doxycycline Did Not Improve Early Postoperative Outcomes in Hip Arthroscopy Patients: A Retrospective Cohort Study

AbstractDoxycycline has been shown to reduce fibroblast activity in the treatment of multiple pathologies, and was utilized as part of the postoperative medication protocol to help prevent adhesions from developing after hip arthroscopy. The purpose of this study was to compare early postoperative pain outcomes between consecutive case series of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) patients treated with or without a 7-day postoperative course of doxycycline following hip arthroscopy. We hypothesized that the doxycycline-treated group would have superior patient-reported outcomes at 6 weeks, and the effect would be more pronounced for patients with low preoperative mental health scores.Our institutional review board–approved prospective outcomes registry was queried for patients who had undergone arthroscopic femoral osteochondroplasty and/or labral repair or reconstruction secondary to FAIS performed by a single, fellowship-trained surgeon. A 7-day postoperative course of doxycycline was initiated in 2018. Six-week postoperative Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS) global (HOOSglobal) and International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT) scores were compared between the consecutive series treated with versus without doxycycline. Additional subgroup analysis was performed on patients with low preoperative Veterans RAND 12-Item Health Survey (VR-12) mental component scores to determine possible additional benefit of postoperative doxycycline in this group.A total of 134 patients (98 female, 36 male, age = 36.2 ± 13.4 years, body mass index [BMI] = 27.2 ± 5 kg/m2) were identified between 2013 and 2020. There were no differences between the control (n = 84) and doxycycline group (n = 50) in age, sex, or BMI. Postoperative HOOSglobal scores (control = 58.5 ± 13.1, doxycycline = 58.7 ± 14.7, p = 0.96) and iHOT scores (control = 54.4 ± 22.2, doxycycline = 52.3 ± 24.8, p = 0.61) did not differ between groups. The subset of 83 patients with low preoperative mental scores showed no differences in HOOSglobal (control = 51.6 ± 13.3, doxycycline = 57.3 ± 7.4, p = 0.12) or iHOT scores (control = 45.5 ± 20.3, doxycycline = 53.6 ± 23.1, p = 0.250).Our results do not support the hypothesis that postoperative doxycycline leads to significant improvement in early postoperative pain scores or functional outcomes in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for FAIS.

Three-Dimensional Measures of Bony Resection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Are Related to Alpha Angle Measures: A Cadaveric Study

PurposeTo determine whether 3-dimensional (3D)–reconstructed proximal femoral bone models can be used to quantify femoral osteochondroplasty and to determine whether the 3D-based metrics are related to clinical alpha angle measures.MethodsSix cadaveric specimens with cam-type morphology underwent open femoral osteochondroplasty. Alpha angles were measured on the oblique axial computed tomography slice before and after femoral osteochondroplasty. Preoperative and postoperative computed tomography–based 3D reconstructed femur models were generated for each cadaveric specimen. A 3D-3D registration technique was used to merge the preoperative and postoperative models to measure the surface-to-surface distance between the model surfaces. Bivariate correlation analyses were used to determine the correlations between the preoperative, and the difference between the preoperative and postoperative alpha angle (Δ alpha angle) measures and each of the femoral osteochondroplasty variables of surface area (mm2), volume (mm3), maximum height (mm), and mean height (mm). The strength of the bivariate correlations was defined as follows: weak 0.1 to 0.3, moderate 0.3 to 0.5, and strong as 0.5 to 1.00.ResultsBivariate correlations revealed a strong positive correlation between preoperative alpha angle with femoral osteochondroplasty volume (r = 0.899, P = .007) and surface area (r = 0.899, P = .007). No significant correlations were found between the change in alpha angle and the osteochondroplasty variables.ConclusionsIn this study, pre- and postoperative 3D bone models could be used to quantify femoral osteochondroplasty and to determine if the 3D-based metrics are related to clinical alpha angle measures.Clinical Relevance3D-reconstructed image bone models may be helpful to ensure that adequate femoroplasty is performed intraoperatively, in particular with arthroscopic approach in which visualization may be challenging due to capsular management issues and surgeon experience.

Proximal Overresection During Femoral Osteochondroplasty Negatively Affects the Distractive Stability of the Hip Joint: A Cadaver Study

Background: Contact between the acetabular labrum and articular cartilage of the femoral head creates a suction seal that helps maintain stability of the femoral head in the acetabulum. A femoral osteochodroplasty may occasionally extend proximally into the femoral head, diminishing the articular surface area available for sealing contact. Purpose: To determine whether proximal overresection decreases the rotational and distractive stability of the hip joint. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Six hemipelvises in the following conditions were tested: intact, T-capsulotomy, osteochondroplasty to the physeal scar, and 5- and 10-mm proximal extension. The pelvis was secured to a metal plate, and the femur was potted and attached to a multiaxial hip jig. Specimens were axially distracted using a load from 0 to 150 N. For rotational stability testing, 5 N·m of internal and external torque was applied. Both tests were performed at different angles of flexion (0°, 15°, 30°, 60°, 90°). Displacement and rotation were recorded using a 3-dimensional motion tracking system. Results: The T-capsulotomy decreased the distractive stability of the hip joint. A femoral osteochondroplasty up to the physeal scar did not seem to affect the distractive stability. However, a proximal extension of the resection by 5 and 10 mm increased axial instability at every angle of flexion tested, with the greatest increase observed at larger angles of flexion (P < .01). External rotation increased significantly after T-capsulotomy in smaller angles of flexion (0°, P = .01; 15°, P = .01; 30°, P = .03). Femoral osteochondroplasty did not create further external rotational instability, except when the resection was extended 10 mm proximally and the hip was in 90° of flexion (P = .04). Conclusion: This cadaveric study demonstrated that proximal extension of osteochondroplasty into the femoral head compromises the distractive stability of the hip joint but does not affect hip rotational stability. Clinical Relevance: Clinically, this study highlights the importance of accuracy when performing femoral osteochondroplasty to minimize proximal extension that may increase iatrogenic instability of the hip joint.

MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.

The purpose of this in vitro study was to quantify the bone resected from the proximal femur during hip arthroscopy using metrics generated from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) reconstructed three-dimensional (3D) bone models. Seven cadaveric hemi-pelvises underwent both a 1.5 T MRI and CT scan before and following an arthroscopic proximal femoral osteochondroplasty. The images from MRI and CT were segmented to generate 3D proximal femoral surface models. A validated 3D--3D registration method was used to compare surface--to--surface distances between the 3D models before and following surgery. The new metrics of maximum height, mean height, surface area and volume, were computed to quantify bone resected during osteochondroplasty. Stability of the metrics across imaging modalities was established through paired sample t--tests and bivariate correlation. Bivariate correlation analyses indicated strong correlations between all metrics (r = 0.728--0.878) computed from MRI and CT derived models. There were no differences in the MRI- and CT-based metrics used to quantify bone resected during femoral osteochondroplasty. Preoperative- and postoperative MRI and CT derived 3D bone models can be used to quantify bone resected during femoral osteochondroplasty, without significant differences between the imaging modalities.

Revision Hip Arthroscopy in the Native Hip: A Review of Contemporary Evaluation and Treatment Options.

Hip arthroscopy is a reproducible and efficacious procedure for the treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS). Despite this efficacy, clinical failures are observed, clinical entities are challenging to treat, and revision hip arthroscopy may be required. The most common cause of symptom recurrence after a hip arthroscopy that leads to a revision arthroscopy is residual cam morphology as a result of inadequate femoral osteochondroplasty and restoration of head–neck offset, though several other revision etiologies including progressive chondral and labral pathologies also exist. In these cases, it is imperative to perform a comprehensive examination to identify the cause of a failed primary arthroscopy as to assess whether or not a revision hip arthroscopy procedure is indicated. When a secondary procedure is indicated, approaches may consist of revision labral repair, complete labral reconstruction, or labral augmentation depending on labral integrity. Gross instability or imaging-based evidence of microinstability may necessitate capsular augmentation or plication. If residual cam or pincer morphology is present, additional resection of the osseous abnormalities may be warranted. This review article discusses indications, the evaluation of patients with residual symptoms after primary hip arthroscopy, and the evaluation of outcomes following revision hip arthroscopy through an evidence-based discussion. We also present a case example of a revision hip arthroscopy procedure to highlight necessary intraoperative techniques during a revision hip arthroscopy.

Care of low-income patients with sports injuries disincentivized by government reimbursement

Objectives: The purpose of this study is to compare Medicaid reimbursement rates with regional Medicare reimbursement for 10 commonly performed orthopaedic sports medicine procedures. Design: Database review. Setting: State Medicaid physician fee schedules and national Medicare fee schedule. Intervention: Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement for meniscus debridement (medial or lateral), meniscus repair (medial or lateral), anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) reconstruction, anterior labral (Bankart) repair, rotator cuff repair, biceps tenodesis, femoral osteochondroplasty, acetabular osteoplasty, and acetabular labral repair. Main outcome measurement: Overall Medicaid to Medicare reimbursement ratio, dollar difference between Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement, dollar difference between Medicaid and Medicare per relative value unit (RVU), dispersion of reimbursement rates. Results and conclusions: Significant discrepancies were found between Medicaid and Medicare reimbursement for all 10 procedures, with Medicaid reimbursing on average 65.15% of the Medicare rate. Medicaid reimbursement also exhibited substantial variation between individual state programs. Financial incentives matter and between these two government programs, orthopaedic surgeons are incentivized to provide care to elderly patients over poorer patients. Level of Evidence: IV; Economic Analysis Keywords: Medicaid; Medicare; Reimbursement; RVU; Variation (J Ortho Business 2021; 1:4-6)

Arthroscopic Fixation of Os Acetabuli and Labral Repair: Suture-on-Screw Technique

Os acetabuli is thought to be the result of an unfused ossification center or an acetabular rim fracture in the setting of femoral-sided femoroacetabular impingement syndrome. Historically, patients with symptomatic hips have been treated with resection alone; however, in patients with large bone fragments or with reduced acetabular coverage prior to surgical intervention, iatrogenic dysplasia and structural instability may develop after resection. Therefore, for patients with an acetabular os, labral tearing, and cam-type femoroacetabular impingement, internal fixation of the os acetabuli, femoral osteochondroplasty, and labral repair have been described. We propose a “suture-on-screw” arthroscopic technique to simultaneously address both the labral tear and os acetabuli, thereby reducing the number of suture anchors required for labral fixation, leading to an efficient and cost-effective approach for the treatment of these patients.

Hip arthroscopy following slipped capital femoral epiphysis fixation: chondral damage and labral tears findings.

PurposeThis study investigated the association between chondrolabral damage and time to arthroscopic surgery for slipped capital femoral epiphysis (SCFE).MethodsThis was a descriptive retrospective study that enrolled patients with SCFE who underwent hip arthroscopy for femoral osteochondroplasty after SCFE fixation. SCFE type, time from SCFE symptom onset or slip fixation surgery to hip arthroscopy and intraarticular arthroscopic findings were recorded. Acetabular chondrolabral damage was evaluated according to the Konan and Outerbridge classification systems. Nested analysis of variance and the chi-squared test were used for statistical analyses.ResultsWe analyzed 22 cases of SCFE in 17 patients (five bilateral). The mean age at the time of hip arthroscopy was 13.6 years-old (8–20), and mean time from SCFE fixation to arthroscopy was 25.1 months (3 weeks to 8 years). Labral frying was present in 20 cases, labral tears in 16 and acetabular chondral damage in 17. The most frequent lesion was type 3 (41%) (Konan classification). Two cases had a grade III and 1 had a grade II acetabular chondral lesion (Outerbridge classification). Positive associations were observed between time from SCFE to hip arthroscopy and hip intraarticular lesions evaluated using Konan (p = 0.004) and Outerbridge (p = 0.000) classification systems. There was no association between SCFE severity (chi-squared = 0.315), stability (chi-squared = 0.558) or temporality (chi-squared = 0.145) type and hip intraarticular lesions.ConclusionA longer time from SCFE symptom onset and fixation to hip arthroscopy is associated with greater acetabular chondrolabral damage.Level of evidenceIV

Capsular closure in patients with femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS): results of a matched-cohort study from the Danish hip arthroscopy registry.

Capsular closure in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) patients during hip arthroscopy procedures is debated. The Danish Hip Arthroscopy Registry (DHAR) contains data to perform matched-cohort analyses. The purpose of this study is to evaluate 1-year subjective outcome data from DHAR after hip arthroscopy for FAIS with capsular closure and compare these outcome data with a matched-cohort study group. The primary hypothesis was that there would be no difference in Copenhagen Hip and Groin Outcome Score (HAGOS) subjective outcome between patients with and without capsular closure. This is a retrospective cohort study (level of evidence, 3). FAIS patients eligible for hip arthroscopy between January 2012 and December 2017, and where the interportal capsulotomy was closed, were identified and matched with patients without capsular closure. Matching criteria were gender (1:1), age (±5 years), degree of cartilage injury: ICRS and modified Becks grade (±1 grade) and radiological parameters: lateral center edge angle and alpha angle (±10°). A comparison between cohorts regarding differences in patient outcome scores, HAGOS, Hip Sports Activity Scale (HSAS), EuroQol-5 Domain (EQ-5D) and numeric rating scale (NRS) pain at 1-year follow-up were performed. Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to compare differences between preoperative and postoperative subjective outcome scores, level of statistical significance was 0.05. A total of 189 patients were included in the capsular closure group and matched with 189 control patients. The mean age in years (±standard deviation) was 39.4 (±11.8) and 39.3 (±11.2), respectively, 55% females. Both groups improved significantly at 1-year follow-up. Significant improvements in the capsular closure group were found in HSAS, EQ-5D, NRS pain (rest and walk) and most HAGOS subscales compared with the non-closure group. All patients underwent labral repair in combination with both femoral osteochondroplasty and acetabuloplasty. The revision rate reported after 2 years was 6.8% in the non-closure group and 3.5% in the closure group. One patient in each cohort received a total hip replacement after 2 years. Capsular closure during arthroscopic FAIS treatment resulted in better subjective outcomes and less pain during rest and walking compared with matched controls. Both groups demonstrated improved outcome at 1-year follow-up. Furthermore, capsular closure might result in a lower risk of a revision hip arthroscopy.

The Effect of Resection Size in the Treatment of Cam-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement in the Typical Patient With Hip Arthroscopy: A Biomechanical Analysis

Background: Arthroscopic osteochondroplasty may improve range of motion and relieve pain in patients with symptomatic hip impingement. Femoral neck fracture is a risk of this procedure because of the weakening of the proximal femur. To our knowledge, there are no biomechanical studies in young human cadaveric bone evaluating the effect of osteochondroplasty on femoral neck strength. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to evaluate loads to fracture in young human cadavers after resection depths of 25% and 40% at the head-neck junction. We hypothesized that both depths will maintain ultimate loads to failure above previously published loads, as well as above physiologic weightbearing loads. Study Design: Descriptive laboratory study. Methods: Cadaveric proximal femoral specimens (6 matched pairs, under the age of 47 years) were divided into 2 groups: 25% or 40% of the diameter at the head-neck junction was resected. The length of the resection was 2 cm and the width of the resection was determined by the length of the anterolateral quadrant at the head-neck junction in all cases. A compressive load was applied directly to the femoral head. Peak load, stiffness, and energy to fracture were compared between groups. Results: The average peak load to fracture after 25% resection (7347 N) was significantly higher than after the 40% resection (5892 N) (P = .010). The average energy to fracture was also significantly higher in the 25% resection group (30.2 J vs 19.2 J; P = .007). The average stiffness was higher in the 25% group, although not statistically significant (P = .737). Conclusion: Resection depths of 25% and 40% at the anterolateral quadrant of the femoral head-neck junction may be safe at previously described functional loads such as standing and walking in the age range more typically seen in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy. Loads to fracture were significantly higher than previously reported using older cadaveric specimens. Clinical Relevance: Currently, most surgeons limit weightbearing after femoral osteochondroplasty in part because of risk of femoral neck fracture. Given the higher observed loads to fracture, young patients could possibly bear weight sooner after surgery, although postoperative protocols should be individualized based on patient age, weight, bone density, amount of bone resected, concomitant procedures, and potential compliance with activity restrictions.