Commentary The article by Okike et al. provides new data on rapidly destructive hip disease (RDHD) following intra-articular corticosteroid (IACS) injection of the hip. The risk of an adverse effect on joints by local injections of corticosteroids was mentioned as early as 1951 by Hollander1, but corticosteroid hip injections were very rare during that period. RDHD (50% articular space narrowing in 1 year or femoral head destruction of >2 mm in 1 year) was first described by Forestier in 19572, and RDHD was only reported as an independent disease by Lequesne2 in 1970. As RDHD can be associated with other diseases (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis, chondrocalcinosis, amyloidosis, etc.), and as intra-articular injection of corticosteroids in the hip was uncommon before 1990, the relationship between these 2 events has remained highly debated and contested. After 2000, IACS injections increased in frequency for pain relief and theoretically for postponing total hip arthroplasty (THA) in cases of osteoarthritis (OA) or osteonecrosis. Several recent reports3 have suggested that these injections are associated with adverse events, particularly the paradoxical risk of accelerating the need for arthroplasty. The mystery has been partly solved by Okike et al., whose study confirmed these adverse effects and showed that the risk is related to the dose. Specifically, the authors reported a low risk of RDHD following a single low-dose (≤40-mg) triamcinolone injection but noted a high risk following a high-dose (≥80-mg) injection and multiple injections. What are the lessons that should be drawn from this article? Intra-articular injection represents the most invasive mode of nonoperative treatment that is used for the relief of pain in patients who have not responded to other conservative therapeutic modalities. The adverse effects of systemic corticosteroid therapy on bone, particularly the risk of hip osteonecrosis, are well known. Local injections of corticosteroids are generally considered safe, although they are known to be chondrotoxic4, probably by affecting the proteins of the cartilage, especially aggrecan, type-II collagen, and proteoglycan. Apart from RDHD, other side effects that have been described in association with hip corticosteroid injections include subchondral insufficiency fracture, osteonecrosis, and accelerated OA progression3. Therefore, corticosteroids are probably not as safe as we thought, when injected in the hip. Their use should be decreased, and the indications for hip injections (if any) should be limited. First, it must be remembered that there are other injectable products that may have an analgesic effect, including mesenchymal stem cells, hyaluronic acid, and platelet-rich plasma. Even if these products are often used for symptomatic relief rather than disease reversal, no risk of rapid destruction of a joint has been reported in association with these products. Unlike local corticosteroids, they conform to the old adage “primum non nocere,” and some regenerative potential has been demonstrated, at least in the knee5. Second, when corticosteroid hip injection is performed, the dose and the number of injections should be scrutinized and imaging should be obtained. If IACS injection is performed with ultrasound guidance, clinicians should consider obtaining repeat radiographs, before and after corticosteroid injections, in order to evaluate for eventual narrowing of the joint space. Furthermore, a normal radiograph associated with severe joint pain should lead to pre-injection magnetic resonance imaging to detect hip osteonecrosis, labral abnormality, or subchondral insufficiency fracture. Third, the severity of hip disease should be analyzed before corticosteroid hip injection. Patients with collapsed osteonecrosis or severe OA could be candidates for a limited number of low-dose IACS injections, given that THA would be their only other option to relieve pain. However, when a patient with early hip OA or with hip osteonecrosis without collapse is referred for corticosteroid injection, the patient should be informed about the risk of accelerating the disease, with worsening pain and a possible need for a premature THA to relieve pain. In conclusion, corticosteroid injections are frequently performed in the hip with the hope of relieving pain and of postponing THA. However, the article by Okike et al. should lead to a careful reconsideration of the routine use of corticosteroid hip injection.
Read full abstract