You have accessJournal of UrologyCME1 May 2022MP35-18 CHARACTERISTICS OF SYSTEMIC TESTOSTERONE THERAPY FOR FEMALE HYPOACTIVE SEXUAL DESIRE DISORDER - A CLAIMS DATABASE ANALYSIS Pranjal Agrawal, Kathryn Dumas, Taylor P. Kohn, Jaden R. Kohn, and Marisa Clifton Pranjal AgrawalPranjal Agrawal More articles by this author , Kathryn DumasKathryn Dumas More articles by this author , Taylor P. KohnTaylor P. Kohn More articles by this author , Jaden R. KohnJaden R. Kohn More articles by this author , and Marisa CliftonMarisa Clifton More articles by this author View All Author Informationhttps://doi.org/10.1097/JU.0000000000002589.18AboutPDF ToolsAdd to favoritesDownload CitationsTrack CitationsPermissionsReprints ShareFacebookLinked InTwitterEmail Abstract INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Hypoactive sexual desire disorder (HSDD) is estimated to impact approximately 10% of women but is commonly undiagnosed. Systemic testosterone therapy (alone or with estrogen) improves libido in women with HSDD; however, concern for adverse effects may limit broad utilization. Our objective is to describe trends in systemic testosterone for HSDD using a large US claims database. METHODS: The TriNetX Diamond Network database was queried: a US health research network of 190 million patients, encompassing healthcare encounters and prescriptions. We identified female patients with HSDD (ICD-10 F52.0) without age limitation from 2010 to September 2021. Testosterone prescription trends (total prescriptions, number per patient, incidence over time [prescriptions/person-day] assessed in 2010–2012, 2013–2015, 2016–2018, and 2019–2021), route of administration, and coadministration with estrogen were extracted. Significance over time was assessed using Chi Square for trend. RESULTS: 37,491 women diagnosed with HSDD were identified with mean age 46.5±12.4 years. Only 3.9% of women with HSDD (n=1444) were prescribed systemic testosterone (mean age 50.6±10.0 years). Over time, a statistically significant increase in testosterone prescriptions for HSDD occurred, specifically for women age 18–40 years and 41–55 years, as seen in Figure 1 (p <0.05). Most prescriptions were for injectable testosterone (56.8%), while 29.3% were for topical testosterone and 13.9% with route unknown. 556 women received only 1 prescription for systemic testosterone, 327 received 2-3 prescriptions, 262 received 4-9 prescriptions, and 299 received 10+ prescriptions. Systemic estrogen was co-prescribed for 543 women and vaginal estrogen was co-prescribed for 259 women; 642 women received no estrogen prescription. CONCLUSIONS: Systemic testosterone therapy for HSDD remains rare but its use has increased over time; duration, route, and co-administration with estrogen remain highly variable. Long-term compliance with systemic testosterone therapy remains relatively low. Source of Funding: None © 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.FiguresReferencesRelatedDetails Volume 207Issue Supplement 5May 2022Page: e594 Advertisement Copyright & Permissions© 2022 by American Urological Association Education and Research, Inc.MetricsAuthor Information Pranjal Agrawal More articles by this author Kathryn Dumas More articles by this author Taylor P. Kohn More articles by this author Jaden R. Kohn More articles by this author Marisa Clifton More articles by this author Expand All Advertisement PDF DownloadLoading ...