Fellowship Year Research Articles

Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: perspectives and insights from a nationwide survey of U.S. rheumatology fellows.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize healthcare by enhancing clinical practice, diagnostics, and patient care. Although AI offers potential benefits through data-driven insights and personalized treatments, challenges related to implementation, barriers, and ethical considerations necessitate further investigation. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using Qualtrics from October to December 2023 to evaluate U.S. rheumatology fellows' perspectives on AI in healthcare. The survey was disseminated via email to program directors, who forwarded it to their fellows. It included multiple-choice, Likert scale, and open-ended questions covering demographics, AI awareness, usage, and perceptions. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman correlation and Chi-Square tests. The study received IRB approval and adhered to STROBE guidelines. The survey aimed to reach 528 U.S. rheumatology fellows. 95 fellows accessed the survey with response rate to each question varying between 85 and 95 participants. 57.6% were females, 66.3% aged 30-35, and 60.2% in their first fellowship year. There was a positive correlation between AI familiarity and confidence (Spearman's rho = 0.216, p = 0.044). Furthermore, 67.9% supported incorporating AI education into fellowship programs, with a significant relationship (p < 0.005) between AI confidence and support for AI education. Fellows recognized AI's benefits in reducing chart time (86.05%) and automating tasks (73.26%), but expressed concerns about charting errors (67.86%) and over-reliance (61.90%). Most (84.52%) disagreed with the notion of AI replacing them. Rheumatology fellows exhibit enthusiasm for AI integration yet have reservations about its implementation and ethical implications. Addressing these challenges through collaborative efforts can ensure responsible AI integration, prioritizing patient safety and ethical standards in rheumatology and beyond.

Transitioning to rural practice together: a rural fellowship model (in 6 Ps).

Maintaining a robust healthcare workforce in underserved rural communities continues to be a challenge. To better meet healthcare needs in rural areas, training programs must develop innovative ways to foster transition to, and integration into, these communities. Mountain Area Health Education Center designed and implemented a 12-month post-residency Rural Fellowship program to enhance placement, transition, and retention in rural North Carolina. Utilizing a '6 Ps' framework, the program targeted physicians and pharmacists completing residency with the purpose of recruiting and supporting their transition into the first year of rural practice. To better understand Rural Fellows' experiences and the immediate impact of their Fellowship year, we conducted a semi-structured interview using a narrative technique and evaluated retention rates over time. Interviews with the eight participants, which included Fellowship alumni and current Fellows, demonstrated the impact and influence of the key curricular '6 Ps' framework. An early retention rate of 100% and a long-term retention rate of 87%, combined with expressed clarity of curricular knowledge, skills, and attitudes related to the '6 Ps', demonstrate the potential and effectiveness of this Rural Fellowship model. Participants indicated the Rural Fellowship experience supports the transition to rural practice communities and expands their clinical skills. The Rural Fellowship program demonstrates an effective model to support early career healthcare providers as they begin practice in rural communities in western North Carolina through academic opportunities, personal growth, and professional development. Implementation of this model has demonstrated the success of a rural retention model over a 6-year period. This model has the potential to target an array of clinical providers and disciplines. We started with family medicine and have expanded to psychiatry, obstetrics, pharmacy, and nursing. This study demonstrated that this model supports clinical providers during the critical transition period from residency to practice. Targeting the most important stage of one's medical training, the commencement of professional practice, this is a scalable model for other rural-based health professions education sites where rural recruitment and retention remain a problem.

A Survey Among Psychiatrists to Assess the Need for Psychiatry Sub/Super-specialization Courses in India.

India's landscape of sub/super-specialization courses is expanding rapidly. Numerous courses spanning various domains of psychiatry exist, and this trend is poised to continue its upward trajectory. We aimed to assess the need for sub/super-specialization courses in psychiatry in India and explore the structural components of the courses. This was a cross-sectional study. A total of 142 psychiatrists/psychiatry residents from India were surveyed using an online questionnaire after approval from the Institutional Ethics Committee. "Good" and "intense" need for specialization courses was reported to be highest for child and adolescent psychiatry (68.3%), followed by addiction psychiatry (56.4%) and psychotherapy (55.6%). A 1-year post-doctoral fellowship was reported to be the most preferred course format. Practical examination was suggested to be the preferred summative assessment method for different course formats. The availability of sub/super-specialization courses presents an opportunity to enhance psychiatrists' training in specific areas of interest. Offering a variety of course options enables psychiatrists to select the most suitable program based on their individual requirements and career goals.

The Development and Execution of An Orthopaedic Sports Medicine Fellowship Surgical Skills Assessment

Background: Assessment of orthopaedic surgery trainees is traditionally based on subjective evaluation by faculty. The recent push for value-based health care has placed a premium on improving patient outcomes. As a result, surgical training evaluations for orthopaedic trainees are evolving to include more objective measures to evaluate competency. Purpose: To develop and subsequently demonstrate the efficacy of a novel surgical skills assessment for orthopaedic sports medicine fellows. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A team of 14 fellowship-trained orthopaedic sports medicine surgeons developed objective scoring rubrics for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and rotator cuff repair (RCR) using a modified Delphi process. Rubrics were designed based on 10 surgical steps with a grading scale (1-5) based on core competencies with a maximum summative score of 50. Fourteen orthopaedic fellows across a regionally diverse group of sports medicine–accredited fellowship programs were invited to complete both an ACLR and RCR in a surgical skills laboratory at the beginning and end of their fellowship year. Individual surgical steps, overall performance, and total procedure time were evaluated by a single sports medicine surgeon for both sessions. Results: Thirteen of 14 fellows completed both pre- and post-fellowship assessments. For the ACLR procedure, the pre-fellowship mean summative score was 25.4 (SD, 4.4) and the post-fellowship mean summative score was 38.6 (SD, 4.1), which was a statistically significant improvement (P < .001). For the RCR procedure, the pre-fellowship mean summative score was 26.6 (SD, 5.4) and the post-fellowship mean summative score was 38.8 (SD, 4.3), which was also a statistically significant improvement (P < .001). The mean time to completion for the ACLR procedure was 82.3 minutes (SD, 4.3 minutes) pre-fellowship, which improved to 69.7 minutes (SD, 11.6 minutes) post-fellowship (P = .002). The mean time to completion for the RCR procedure was 85.5 minutes (SD, 5.0 minutes) pre-fellowship, which improved to 76.4 minutes (SD, 7.0 minutes) post-fellowship (P < .001). Conclusion: This surgical skills program represents the first standardized and reproducible instrument for the evaluation of 2 arthroscopic sports medicine procedures in the United States. Orthopaedic sports medicine fellows improved significantly in aggregate over their fellowship year with regard to the ACLR and RCR. The described program has the potential to serve as both a training tool and formal orthopaedic sports medicine fellow assessment.

Analysis of Sex Diversity Within Orthopedic Trauma Surgery Fellowship Programs

Background: Women continue to be underrepresented in orthopedic surgery and in orthopedic fellowship programs, especially in orthopedic trauma. Purpose: We aimed to assess sex diversity among faculty and trainees in orthopedic trauma surgery fellowship programs and investigate whether the presence of female faculty in those programs is associated with the recruitment of female fellows. Methods: This was a cross-sectional analysis of 63 orthopedic trauma surgery fellowship programs. Information regarding program faculty (as of October 2023) and fellows from 2018 to 2024 was gathered. For programs without publicly accessible information, fellowship coordinators were e-mailed for de-identified sex breakdown of fellows categorized by year. The sex of each fellow and faculty member was categorized as male or female and determined by inference from the fellow’s first name and confirmed via Internet search using photos, biographies, and preferred pronouns when available. Results: Of 63 programs with 323 orthopedic trauma faculty, 30 (47.6%) programs had at least 1 female faculty member, with only 4 (6.4%) programs having female fellowship directors. Women made up 12% ( n = 39) of orthopedic trauma faculty. Of 399 total fellows identified over the 6-year period, 67 (16.7%) were women, with a notable increase in the representation of female fellows over time, from 10.8% in 2018 to 25.4% in 2024. Although programs with female faculty had a similar proportion of female fellows over the 6-year period as those without, in the most recent fellowship year (2023–2024), programs with female faculty had a higher proportion of female fellows than those without (38.2% vs 13.5%, respectively). Conclusion: This cross-sectional, observational study suggests that female surgeons remain underrepresented in orthopedic trauma fellowship director roles, although we observed an increasing number of female trainees entering orthopedic trauma surgery fellowship programs in recent years. In the most recent fellowship class studied, programs with female faculty had more than double the proportion of female fellows compared to programs without any female faculty.

Point-of-Care-Ultrasound Quality Assurance Data from Fellow-Performed Exams in a Pediatric Emergency Department: A Descriptive Study.

Point-of-care-ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly used by pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) fellows, but scant data exists on the accuracy of exam interpretations. Our goal was to determine whether agreement on exam interpretation between quality assurance (QA) faculty (reference standard) and PEM fellows varied by fellowship year or exam type. Retrospective review of fellow-performed POCUS exams between January 2019 and June 2022. Negative binomial (NB) random effects regression was used to account for longitudinal measurement of individual fellow performance across 3 years. Fixed effects were exam type and fellowship year. To assess between- and within-user variability across time, a random intercept and slope were included for each fellow. Exactly 3032 exams, performed by 24 fellows, were included. Raw proportion agreement by fellowship year was high for all exam types (≥88%). From the NB model, there was no statistically significant effect of fellowship year on the mean count of agreement. The relative risk (RR) of agreement for exam types was greatest for cardiac vs other types. The standard deviations for the random intercept and random slope were 0.09 and 0.04, respectively, with a correlation of -0.94. PEM fellows generally interpret exams correctly, with little variation through fellowship, although those who began with more basic skills showed more progress over time. Fellowship year did not influence the likelihood of correct interpretation but there was variation across exam type, with the best agreement for cardiac exams. The extent to which disagreements between fellows and QA faculty represent clinically significant errors requires further study.

Assessing the Factors Affecting Recruitment to Child and Adolescent Psychiatry Fellowship Programs.

The objective of this pilot study was to sample early career child and adolescent psychiatrists (EC CAP), Child and Adolescent Psychiatry (CAP) fellows, adult residents, and medical students to identify factors affecting recruitment to CAP fellowship. A 25-item questionnaire was sent to all adult psychiatry, CAP fellowship, triple-board residency program directors, and coordinators in the US to disseminate to their trainees. Questionnaires also were disseminated via professional groups on social media, and through psychiatry student interest groups to medical students. A total of 369 people responded, of which 315 questionnaires were evaluable. Approximately half of the respondents were CAP fellows or EC CAP. Most decided to pursue a career in child psychiatry during medical school. Forty-three percent owed more than $200,000 in educational debt. The top reasons for pursuing a career in child and adolescent psychiatry included working with children, finding it to be a rewarding career, and finding it intellectually stimulating. A switch to a 1-year fellowship and higher income potential were noted to be factors that may increase consideration for CAP fellowship among those who chose not to pursue it. The majority of early career child and adolescent psychiatrists were recruited during medical school, motivated by altruistic reasons. Early child psychiatry exposure, a means of addressing physician debt, providing additional incentives in geographically undesirable locations, and improving compensation, is needed to improve recruitment to this specialty.

Unmatched. What's Next? Is a Preliminary Year of Residency or Research Fellowship Better for Reapplicants to Plastic Surgery?

Plastic and reconstructive surgery is one of the most competitive residency programs, and given the increased number of applicants for a relatively fixed number of positions, successfully matching is a challenge. Match rates have declined since 2018, with a match rate of ~55% in 2022. Two common options before reapplying are a preliminary year of residency (preliminary year) or a research fellowship. This study investigated which option is more beneficial for reapplicants seeking a successful match. This retrospective study included all applicants to an integrated plastic and reconstructive surgery residency from 2015 to 2023. Two cohorts based on reapplication strategy (research fellowship or preliminary year) were created. Demographic, applicant, and match data were collected. Pearson chi-squared, Fisher exact, and Wilcoxon rank sum testing were performed. In total, 125 reapplicants were included. Seventy-one (56.8%) reapplicants pursued a preliminary year, and 29 (23.2%) completed a research fellowship. Research fellowship reapplicants had a greater mean number of first author publications (8.8 versus 3.2, P < 0.001), non-first author publications (11.3 versus 5.9, P = 0.021), poster presentations (9.7 versus 6.0, P = 0.028), and oral presentations (11.8 versus 6.4, P < 0.001). Research fellowship reapplicants were more likely to match into plastic and reconstructive surgery (PRS) than preliminary year reapplicants, with 72.4% (n = 21) of research fellowship reapplicants matching into PRS compared with 39.4% (n = 28) of preliminary year reapplicants (P = 0.003). Research fellowship reapplicants demonstrated greater research productivity and were almost twice as likely to match into PRS compared with preliminary reapplicants.

Leading medical schools for female neurosurgery graduates.

The authors sought to determine the medical schools with the highest number and proportion of female graduates currently practicing neurosurgery and to identify medical school characteristics that increase female representation in neurosurgery, with the goal of addressing the gender disparity. The authors used the Physician Compare National Downloadable File from the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. Physicians indicating neurosurgery as their primary specialty were extracted. Duplicates, physicians with medical school education listed as "other," and those expected to be in residency, fellowship, or research years (graduation years 2014-2023) were removed. Medical schools with the highest number and proportion of female neurosurgery graduates were stratified. A review of the current literature was conducted to identify characteristics of the institutions with high female representation. A total of 3486 neurosurgeons (319 female [9.2%], 3167 male [90.8%]) were identified. Yale University (n = 12), Columbia University (n = 8), Johns Hopkins University (n = 8), Stanford University (n = 8), and the University of Maryland (n = 8) had the most female neurosurgery graduates. Schools with the highest proportion of female neurosurgery graduates included the University of California, San Diego (25%); the State University of New York Upstate Medical University (25%); Pennsylvania State University (22.2%); the University of Maryland (21.1%); and the University of Florida (18.4%). Achieving gender diversity in neurosurgery necessitates a multifaceted approach. Institutions with a higher number and proportion of female neurosurgery graduates emphasized female-female mentorship, fostered diversity initiatives, and implemented inclusive policies. To increase female representation in neurosurgery, it is crucial to establish robust mentorship programs that provide aspiring female neurosurgeons with the guidance, support, and motivation required to navigate a traditionally male-dominated field.

Consistency of ablations with trainee and increasing independence during fellowship training-Analysis of ablation data by CARTONET.

Training in clinical cardiac electrophysiology (CCEP) involves the development of catheter handling skills to safely deliver effective treatment. Objective data from analysis of ablation data for evaluating trainee of CCEP procedures has not previously been possible. Using the artificial intelligence cloud-based system (CARTONET), we assessed the impact of trainee progress through ablation procedural quality. Lesion- and procedure-level data from all de novo atrial fibrillation (AF) and cavotricuspid isthmus (CTI) ablations involving first-year (Y1) or second-year (Y2) fellows across a full year of fellowship was curated within Cartonet. Lesions were automatically assigned to anatomic locations. Lesion characteristics, including contact force, catheter stability, impedance drop, ablation index value, and interlesion time/distance were similar over each training year. Anatomic location and supervising operator significantly affected catheter stability. The proportion of lesion sets delivered independently and of lesions delivered by the trainee increased steadily from the first quartile of Y1 to the last quartile of Y2. Trainee perception of difficult regions did not correspond to objective measures. Objective ablation data from Cartonet showed that the progression of trainees through CCEP training does not impact lesion-level measures of treatment efficacy (i.e., catheter stability, impedance drop). Data demonstrates increasing independence over a training fellowship. Analyses like these could be useful to inform individualized training programs and to track trainee's progress. It may also be a useful quality assurance tool for ensuring ongoing consistency of treatment delivered within training institutions.

Serious Illness Communication Tool for Palliative Care Fellows: Development, Implementation, and Lessons Learned.

Introduction: Learning expert communication skills is a core educational goal within palliative care training, yet there are few communication-based educational tools specifically designed for specialty-trained palliative care providers. Objective: To develop and implement a tool to facilitate effective learning of serious illness communication for hospice and palliative medicine fellows. Methods: A novel formative assessment tool was developed within the UCLA Palliative Care Fellowship program, and utilized throughout the academic year on a weekly basis. Focus groups were held for fellows and faculty separately at the end of the academic year in order to gain insight into the experience and effectiveness of the tool. Focus group transcripts were analyzed through thematic analysis. Results: There was a 47% participation rate in the focus groups (n = 7). Qualitative analysis demonstrated positive impact of the tool in identifying learning goals, improving quality of feedback, and in standardizing language around advanced communication skills, with most value in the first half of the fellowship year. Some aspects of the tool were found to increase feedback anxiety, including the competency scoring component, frequency of use, and utilization with individual patient encounters. Conclusion: This novel communication tool provides an important addition to serious illness communication training of specialist palliative care providers, in creating a shared mental model for naming and organizing skills, as well as generating specific high quality learning goals and feedback. Preliminary feedback from our pilot implementation phase provided important information about how to refine the tool and remove components that unnecessarily added to feedback anxiety.

Publications Among Pain Medicine Fellowship-Trained American Board of Anesthesiology Diplomates.

American Board of Anesthesiology (ABA) diplomates who pursue clinical fellowship training in pain medicine may be better suited to lead scholarly projects and serve as first authors of publications in peer-reviewed journals given their additional training and clinical expertise. The primary aim of this study was to determine whether ABA certification in pain medicine is associated with a greater number of peer-reviewed publications. The secondary aim included assessments of whether pain medicine fellowship training is associated with a higher publication rate (publications per year) or publication in a larger number of peer-reviewed journals. A literature search was conducted in December 2023 using the Scopus database for publications related to anesthesiology and pain medicine in the United States between 2013 and 2023. First authors identified through the search were then individually searched within the ABA physician directory. The following data were collected: author name and identification number, year of publication, publication type (article or review), year of primary anesthesiology certification, and year of fellowship, if applicable. This study identified 9,612 publications and 6,924 unique first authors. Pain medicine fellowship training was associated with a statistically significant increase (p-value < 0.001) in the number of publications (0.546; 95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.386-0.707), publications per year (0.140; 95% CI, 0.121-0.159), and publication in a larger number of peer-reviewed journals (0.256; 95% CI, 0.182-0.330) in regression models adjusted for the number of years from certification. This query of the Scopus database and ABA physician directory indicates that pain medicine fellowship training is associated with statistically significant increases in research productivity, as defined by the number of publications, publications per year, or the number of publications in peer-reviewed journals. However, these increases in research output would not lead to a marked increase inscholarship productivity to justify pursuing a fellowship for this purpose.

AI-assisted colonoscopy in gastroenterology fellowship training: An interim analysis of a randomized controlled trial.

e15642 Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) assisted colonoscopy may increase adenoma detection rates (ADR) for endoscopists, but its role for trainees in learning endoscopy has not been delineated. This randomized control trial explores the impact of AI on ADR by year of fellowship and anatomical location. Methods: In a registered randomized controlled trial (NCT05423964), gastroenterology fellows were assigned to AI (GI Genius, Medtronic; Minneapolis, MN) vs. conventional colonoscopy(CC). We included all symptomatic or screening colonoscopies with adequate bowel prep by trainees (postgraduate year 4-6). Baseline demographics, polyp pathology, size in 5mm increments, and location, and ADR was collected and compared for AI versus CC arms. A multivariate regression was used to identify factors influencing ADR of the right colon. Results: Of 685 colonoscopies between March 15th to July 28th, 2023, a total of 381 procedures performed by 17 fellows met criteria. Patient characteristics were similar between arms. In the CC arm, there was no difference in ADR among fellow years (1st 39% vs. 2nd 33% vs. 3rd 36%, p = 0.63; Right colon: 1st 31% vs 2nd 21% vs 3rd 30%, P = 0.21). Within 2nd year fellows, there was higher ADR using AI vs. CC for screening colonoscopies (52% vs 17%, p = 0.025). In the right colon, ADR was significantly higher using AI vs. CC for screening alone colonoscopies within 1st and 2nd year fellows (1st 50% vs 13%, p = 0.04; 2nd 57% vs 9%, p &lt; 0.001). 2nd year fellows also increased ADR in the right colon using AI vs CC for symptomatic and screening colonoscopies (44% vs 21%, p = 0.001). There was no difference in procedural time with addition of AI, but a trend to longer withdrawal time. Multivariable logistic regression analysis also showed AI assisted colonoscopies was associated with enhanced ADR in right colon for trainees performing colonoscopy for symptomatic and screening (OR [95%CI]: 2 [1.3-3.3]) and screening alone (OR [95%CI]: 8.3 [2.5-26.6]). Conclusions: This randomized control trial shows AI assisted colonoscopies improve ADR, particularly in the right colon for postgraduate trainees. We propose a use case for AI assisted colonoscopy guiding targeted improvement of ADR in in the right colon which has been highlighted by the American Gastroenterology Association as an area of need. Clinical trial information: NCT05423964 . [Table: see text]

Predictive factors for academic oncology career placement.

9039 Background: Oncology is a discipline that has witnessed rapid expansion with new therapeutics and practices. Following this trend, training programs are increasingly valuing the cultivation of academic oncologists who will contribute to these developments through research. This study aims to explore characteristics of fellowship programs in the US promoting academic careers in oncology (initial academic position). Methods: A sampling of graduated fellow profiles available on the public websites of US hematology-oncology programs was conducted. To minimize over-representation from programs, even sampling of all available graduated fellows by year was done with a maximum of 10 per program. Characteristics including demographics, educational background, google scholar publication count during fellowship (divided into quartiles), program characteristics, and initial job (academics vs private practice) were collected. Academics was defined as working for an institution associated with a medical school. Logistic regression modeling was utilized to identify characteristics associated with higher odds of initial academic placement. Results: Between 2007 and 2023, 564 graduated fellows were identified, making up 39% of programs, with a majority favoring more recent years. Fellows graduating from NCI cancer center-associated programs and those of academic programs had significantly higher odds of obtaining an initial academic position (OR 1.60, 95% CI 1.08-2.38, p &lt;0.05; OR 2.25, 95% CI 1.22-4.30, p &lt;0.05). The strongest association was noted with scholarly productivity. Fellows of the highest quartile of productivity during their fellowship years (OR 9.70, 4.94-19.80, p &lt;0.001) had the highest odds of obtaining an initial academic position. Characteristics without significant association included type of medical school (US vs IMG) and gender. Conclusions: Our data shows several characteristics associated with higher odds of initial academic placement, but most prominently, fellows of the highest quartile of research productivity were more than nine times likely than those of the lowest quartile of research productivity to obtain an academic position after fellowship. Our study is limited by its observational nature, but the magnitude and significance of association is worth investigating further and can shed light on the value of fellowship academic initiatives to foster research development. Select variables of a logistic regression model examining characteristics associated with obtaining an initial academic position after fellowship. Gender and Medical School status not included. [Table: see text]

Mental Health First Aid for Black Populations: Recommendations From the Neighborhood Healers Project

Community-based participatory action research can facilitate counseling psychologists’ engagement in social justice to benefit Black people’s mental health. One way to improve Black mental health is to equip credible and trustworthy community members with mental health knowledge and skills to support other community members experiencing mental health challenges. This study presents the Neighborhood Healers Project—a community-based participatory action research project that trains Black adults (Neighborhood Healers Fellows) in Mental Health First Aid (MHFA). During the inaugural 12-month fellowship year, we collected longitudinal qualitative data from N = 20 Fellows on the relevance of MHFA to Black people. In this paper, we examined their responses using reflexive thematic analysis. Findings included two themes with affiliated subthemes: (a) Liberatory Paradigm Shift and (b) For Us By Us: Culturally Relevant Curriculum. We conclude with implications for counseling psychologists.

Validity evidence for a novel multiple-choice question bank in the field of child abuse pediatrics

BackgroundThough child abuse pediatrics has been a board-certified subspecialty for 15 years, there are few formalized board preparation resources available. ObjectiveThe purpose of this project was to establish a multiple-choice question bank with sufficient validity evidence for use in preparation for the child abuse pediatrics board examination. Participants and settingThe question bank was distributed via an electronic child abuse pediatrics mailing list. Participants completing the entire question bank included 27 board-certified child abuse pediatricians (CAPs), 19 board-eligible CAPs, and 18 CAP fellows. MethodsWe used Messick's framework to conduct the validity investigation, which includes five components: content evidence, response process, internal structure, relation to other variables, and consequences. Item analyses included difficulty index, discrimination index, and distractor analysis. We used Cronbach's alpha to estimate internal consistency reliability. We conducted linear regressions of scores on the question bank compared to in-training exam scores and career stage. ResultsEighty-four participants completed part of the question bank, and 64 completed the entire question bank. Of the original 117 questions (“items”), 94 met inclusion criteria. The mean score among board-certified CAPs was 80 %, and among participants reporting passing third-year ITE scores was 81 %. Correlation coefficient of scores on this question bank by career stage was r = 0.94, and by year of fellowship was r = 0.99. Cronbach's alpha for internal consistency reliability was 0.83. ConclusionsThis multiple-choice question bank is the first question bank with a robust validity investigation for use by child abuse pediatrics trainees.

Pediatric Anesthesiology Milestones 2.0: An Update, Rationale, and Plan Forward.

Formal training in the subspecialty of pediatric anesthesiology began >60 years ago. Over the years, the duration and clinical work has varied, but what has stayed constant is a mission to develop clinically competent and professionally responsible pediatric anesthesiologists. Since accreditation in 1997, there has been additional guidance by the Accreditation Council on Graduate Medical Education (ACGME) and greater accountability to the public that we, indeed, are producing competent and professional pediatric anesthesiologists. This has been influenced by the slow evolution from time-based educational curriculum to a competency-based paradigm. As with all ACGME-accredited specialties, education leaders in pediatric anesthesiology first convened in 2014 to design specialty-specific developmental trajectories within the framework of the 6 core competencies, known as milestones, on which fellows were to be tracked during the 1-year fellowship. With 5 years of implementation, and substantial data and feedback, it has become clear that an iterative improvement was necessary to mirror the evolution of the profession. It was evident that the community required brevity and clarity in the next version of the milestones and required additional resources for assessment and faculty development. We describe here the methodology and considerations of our working group, guided by ACGME, in the rewriting of the milestones. We also provide suggestions for implementation and collaboration to support the education and assessment of pediatric anesthesiology fellows across the country.

AGING AND FOREIGN POLICY: EXPERIENCING THE GLOBAL TRACK OF THE HEALTH AND AGING POLICY FELLOWSHIP

Abstract The Health and Aging Policy Fellowship includes a Global Track that provides fellows with the opportunity to shape global policy or U.S. foreign policy for an aging society. The author, a global health expert and 2022-2023 fellow, sought a fellowship placement with a member of Congress with jurisdiction over U.S. global health policy. Although global health is a significant foreign policy priority for the U.S. government, U.S. global health programs do not include dedicated funding for activities designed to benefit older adults or help development partners adapt to population aging. The result is that US-funded programs on issues from infectious disease to health systems strengthening to disaster relief lack a focus on older adults, despite their many links to this growing population. To help address this policy gap, the author secured a fellowship placement with Senator Benjamin Cardin (D-MD), a senior member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee (SFRC) and Chair of the SFRC Subcommittee overseeing the State Department, US Agency for International Development, and bilateral development assistance. With his track record of legislation and oversight on issues such as Medicare, health disparities, medical research, oral health, health systems strengthening, and retirement security, Senator Cardin is well positioned to help integrate the needs of older adults into U.S. development assistance. The author used his fellowship year to help advance the global health-related legislative priorities of Senator Cardin and his Health Team, bringing his expertise and perspective on aging to the policy table while gaining invaluable skills in the policy process.

DEVELOPING A GERIATRIC ONCOLOGY FELLOWSHIP SUBSPECIALTY TRACK FOR ADVANCED PRACTICE PROVIDERS

Abstract Although a relatively young subspeciality, geriatric oncology is a fast-growing discipline. As the population ages, clinicians skilled in geriatric oncology principles and management are needed to care for an increasingly complex older adult population. Educating Advanced Practice Providers (APP) in geriatric oncology may offer innovative ways of increasing access to care, supporting patient health, and improving quality of life. The need for trained clinicians represented a unique opportunity for the development of a geriatric oncology focused APP fellowship subspecialty track at our institution. In 2019, with support from the Samuels Foundation, an electronic geriatric oncology needs assessment was completed among the APPs at our institution. Data from this needs assessment and from a thorough literature review were used to develop the geriatric oncology fellowship track curriculum. With support from APP leadership at our institution, the fellowship track launched in September, 2021. It is a 12-month postgraduate academic program that focuses on geriatric assessment, risk stratification prior to cancer directed therapies, management of geriatric syndromes, and geriatric co-management. Additionally in 2023, the fellowship track will include an elective in a long-term care facility. We believe this unique elective rotation will be a strong addition to the clinical experience of the fellow. Our current program has one position per fellowship year with the goal of increasing the number of positions in the future. This is a major step forward in the education of APPs in the care of older adults with cancer that we hope will be replicated across the country.

Narrative Medicine in Hospice and Palliative Care: A Longitudinal Fellowship Curriculum Pilot.

Growing evidence suggests that clinician exposure to narrative medicine (NM) may help bolster resilience and mitigate burnout. The value of formal longitudinal training in NM for hospice and palliative medicine (HPM) trainees remains understudied. A 1-year longitudinal NM curriculum for HPM fellows was pilot-tested for feasibility, acceptability, and exploratory impact. Six monthly 45-minute sessions included reading literature, reflective writing, and sharing creative work. Quantitative and qualitative data were collected through a pre-intervention survey and post-intervention survey administered immediately upon completion of the curriculum. Longitudinal impact was assessed with a post-intervention survey administered three months after completion of the curriculum. All HPM fellows (n = 6) attended at least 5/6 sessions during the 1-year pilot, suggesting intervention feasibility. Participant engagement and self-reported comfort with NM exercises supported intervention acceptability. Post-intervention, participants described the positive influence of NM practice on their clinical practice and stated an intention to integrate NM skills in their future HPM careers. Three months following the intervention, participants had a sustained increase in their comfort level with NM. All participants felt that the NM sessions had been relevant to their life as HPM fellows and anticipated using NM moving forward in their practice of HPM. This novel NM curriculum was feasible and acceptable to implement in a 1-year HPM fellowship. Longitudinal impact showed sustained increase in trainee comfort and interest in using NM in their future clinical practice.