Fellowship Program Research Articles

Opportunity for increasing applicant diversity in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs

Opportunity for increasing applicant diversity in gynecologic oncology fellowship programs

Gender Disparity in Academic Trauma Surgery: The Current State of Affairs.

Despite the increasing number of female surgeons in general surgery programs, women are still inadequately represented in leadership positions. This study aims to investigate the magnitude of gender bias in university-based trauma surgery fellowship programs and leadership positions in the United States of America. FRIEDA was used to identify trauma surgery programs. A thorough website review of each program obtained further information on faculty members, including their name, age, gender, and faculty rank. Trauma surgeons with an MD or DO qualification and a faculty rank of Professor, Associate Professor, or Assistant Professor were selected for inclusion in this study. SCOPUS was used to assess the H-index and the number of publications and citations of surgeons. The total number of programs included was 136, consisting of 715 faculty members. Less than a quarter (n = 166; 23.2%) comprised females and less than one-fifth (n = 30; 19%) of female surgeons were Professors. The difference in the research productivity of male and female trauma surgeons was statistically significant (P < .05), with the average H-index being 10 vs 7.5, respectively, amongst the top 50 surgeons of both genders. Based on a multiple regression analysis, academic rank was significantly associated (P < .05), and gender was not significantly associated (P > .05) with H-index. Gender disparity exists in the field of trauma surgery, as noted in senior faculty ranks and leadership positions. Female-inclusive state policies, appropriate mentorship, and supportive institutions can help to bridge this gap.

Improving Behavioral Healthcare Access Disparities by Training Providers in Disadvantaged Communities - Evidence of Strategy Effectiveness.

Inadequate access to behavioral health services disproportionately impacts marginalized populations who live in disadvantaged areas. To reduce this gap, programs dedicated to optimizing behavioral health education and training must focus their efforts to enroll providers who practice in these disadvantaged areas. The Train New Trainers (TNT) fellowship program aims to enhance behavioral health knowledge, skills, and attitudes of primary care providers (PCPs) who deliver care in disadvantaged communities. We evaluate the effectiveness of the TNT recruitment strategy and the use of scholarships for targeting and recruiting PCPs who practice in disadvantaged communities. Observational study. TNT fellows from 2016 to 2023. State/federal classifications of medically underserved counties were used to establish scholarship criteria. Area Deprivation Index (ADI) was utilized to provide criterion validity for the use of state/federal criteria in the recruitment strategy, and to evaluate the effectiveness of the program in successfully recruiting PCPs practicing in disadvantaged communities. Practice location data were available for 347 fellows, 88.8% of whom received scholarships. Of the 347 practices, 300 (86.5%) primarily served communities meeting at least one state or federal criterion for medical shortage areas and/or underserved areas. According to ADI scores, 32.3% of practices served areas classified in the highest ADI (ADI decile 9 or 10), with a progressive increase in the proportion of fellows practicing in underserved areas each year; in 2023, 89.9% of practices met federal shortage criteria and 40.5% served areas with the highest deciles of ADI. The TNT program strategy for recruiting PCPs from high medical need geographical areas is associated with bringing primary care psychiatry education to areas considered underserved and disadvantaged. Equipping PCPs practicing in underserved areas with enhanced knowledge and skills in behavioral medicine has the potential to significantly improve the existing access gap in disadvantaged communities.

5.C. Scientific session: Strengthen resilience against emerging vector-borne diseases through the ECDC Fellowship Programmes

Abstract Over the past decade, climate change has impacted the transmission of a wide range of vector-borne diseases (VBDs) in Europe, where locally transmitted outbreaks have occurred. It has been implicated in the observed expansion of competent disease vectors in Europe such as Aedes albopictus, which transmits diseases such as Zika, Dengue and Chikungunya. Climate may influence the life cycle of vectors, and the reproduction rate of viral particles inside vectors and human hosts, which means that upsurges in temperature can reduce the incubation period of these pathogens and the life cycle of vectors, thus boosting transmission risk through elevated vector populations. Moreover, globalization and international air travel contribute to pathogen and vector dispersion internationally. Risk mapping suggests further expansion of the species in northern Europe due to climate change. The above underscores the necessity for more proactive measures, such as developing an effective vector control program by monitoring the density and distribution of hosts and pathogens at urban, national, and cross-border levels. Additionally, establishing early warning systems based on integrated human and zoonotic and entomological surveillance is crucial to detect alerts promptly and comprehend where and when infections may emerge or spread. Furthermore, cross-border collaboration and harmonization of vector-borne surveillance systems across European countries may improve preparedness, control and response to mosquito-borne diseases. Preparedness and response require significant efforts from EU Member States and neighbouring countries. Only through a multidisciplinary approach, involving multiple sectors, can we truly prepare to address public health threats. To contribute to strengthening resilience against cross-border public health and emerging health threats in EU Member States and neighbouring countries, the European Centre of Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) has established three fellowship training programmes. These programmes aim to create and maintain a network of highly qualified epidemiologists, microbiologists and public health professionals and strengthen the public health epidemiology workforce at EU and neighbor countries. This workshop will offer attendees a comprehensive overview of the ECDC’s fellowship programmes, describe how they function and explain their role in preparing for health threats. It will provide examples of three projects carried out by fellows on the implementation of preparedness, response and control measures for emerging vector-borne diseases in European countries at local, national and multinational levels. Those will set the scene for an in-depth analysis of the key challenges faced and can help promote awareness that integrated, multidisciplinary interventions are both feasible and effective in reducing the threat of vector-borne infectious diseases spreading in Europe and neighboring countries. Key messages • ECDC fellowship programmes aim to strengthen resilience against emerging public health threats in EU Member States and neighboring countries. • Fellows are engaged in national and cross-border integrated and multidisciplinary interventions to strengthen preparedness and mitigate the spread of emerging vector-borne diseases.

Building Resilience: Strengthening European public health workforce through ECDC Fellowship Programs

Abstract The European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC) Fellowship programmes offer a two-year training in field epidemiology (EPIET) and in public health microbiology (EUPHEM) aiming to create and maintain a network of highly trained field epidemiologists and public health microbiologists and strengthen the public health epidemiology workforce in the European Union (EU) and beyond. The Mediterranean and Black Sea Programme for Intervention Epidemiology Training (MediPIET) also aims to strengthen the public health workforce in countries neighboring the EU. During the training, fellows who are based in different public health institutes in the EU and neighboring countries, set-up, implement and evaluate surveillance of communicable diseases, investigate outbreaks and conduct operational research directly linked to public health actions. The programmes facilitate knowledge exchange and collaboration across borders, building a foundation for participants and their institutions and promoting long-term collaboration through the alumni network. Participants from diverse disciplinary and cultural backgrounds enable interdisciplinary and multi-sectoral knowledge transfer, enhancing the effectiveness of public health responses. By facilitating collaboration and networking, exchanging experiences, disseminating best practices and assimilating lessons learned, these programmes contribute to addressing contemporary health challenges, including emerging vector-borne diseases and strengthening public health systems in Europe and neighboring regions. In the face of global challenges such as climate change and globalization, the fellowships exemplify how collaboration can strengthen Europe’s defenses against emerging health threats.

A Good Practice for Learning with Public Health Professionals Globally: Humphrey Fellowship Program

Abstract Background International collaborations are valuable yet often undervalued assets that enhance the quality of public health education and bolster the development of the public health workforce. Objectives The Humphrey Fellowship Program, part of the Fulbright Exchange Program, facilitates mid-career professionals’ visits to US-based host universities for an academic year. Fellows engage in a semi-structured fellowship period to achieve self-defined goals, emphasizing professional development, expanded experience, and intercultural exchange. This study advocates for the program’s contribution to enhancing public health education. Results Currently, two universities host fellows in public health. Over decades, fellows have engaged with faculty and professionals, participated in classes and meetings, visited institutions for development purposes, and completed US-based affiliations, contributing significantly to their own and the public health workforce’s advancement. This interaction-based learning approach aids in navigating social and ethical challenges by fostering a deeper understanding of public and global health issues across countries. Conclusions The Humphrey Fellowship Program in public health stands as a commendable model. Similar initiatives could be beneficially replicated in the European region, leveraging local and global successes to strengthen ties with public health education institutions, student communities, and beyond. Key messages • Programs that facilitate international interactions can enhance public health professionals’ understanding of global perspectives. • The Humphrey Fellowship Program in the US stands as a commendable practice for mid-career public health professionals, contributing significant value to the education at host universities.

Artificial intelligence in rheumatology: perspectives and insights from a nationwide survey of U.S. rheumatology fellows.

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is poised to revolutionize healthcare by enhancing clinical practice, diagnostics, and patient care. Although AI offers potential benefits through data-driven insights and personalized treatments, challenges related to implementation, barriers, and ethical considerations necessitate further investigation. We conducted a cross-sectional survey using Qualtrics from October to December 2023 to evaluate U.S. rheumatology fellows' perspectives on AI in healthcare. The survey was disseminated via email to program directors, who forwarded it to their fellows. It included multiple-choice, Likert scale, and open-ended questions covering demographics, AI awareness, usage, and perceptions. Statistical analyses were performed using Spearman correlation and Chi-Square tests. The study received IRB approval and adhered to STROBE guidelines. The survey aimed to reach 528 U.S. rheumatology fellows. 95 fellows accessed the survey with response rate to each question varying between 85 and 95 participants. 57.6% were females, 66.3% aged 30-35, and 60.2% in their first fellowship year. There was a positive correlation between AI familiarity and confidence (Spearman's rho = 0.216, p = 0.044). Furthermore, 67.9% supported incorporating AI education into fellowship programs, with a significant relationship (p < 0.005) between AI confidence and support for AI education. Fellows recognized AI's benefits in reducing chart time (86.05%) and automating tasks (73.26%), but expressed concerns about charting errors (67.86%) and over-reliance (61.90%). Most (84.52%) disagreed with the notion of AI replacing them. Rheumatology fellows exhibit enthusiasm for AI integration yet have reservations about its implementation and ethical implications. Addressing these challenges through collaborative efforts can ensure responsible AI integration, prioritizing patient safety and ethical standards in rheumatology and beyond.

Ten lessons for future MSCA/COFUND applicants

The Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA) support researchers' training and development and prioritise international mobility and interdisciplinary collaboration. As the European Commission’s flagship doctorate and post-doctorate fellowship programme, it is fiercely competitive. This perspective piece aims to support future applicants of the programme by presenting ten lessons learned derived from three MSCA/COFUND projects: DTA3 doctoral programme in the UK, Train@Ed post-doctoral programme at the University of Edinburgh, and iMED at the University of Copenhagen, Denmark. The lessons cover recruitment strategies, enhanced training and career development programmes, and effective project management. Key recommendations include initiating early recruitment, supporting international mobility, embedding EDI within processes, promoting social cohesion, aligning stakeholders' expectations, developing standardised procedures, appropriately managing time and finances, and maintaining realistic project plans. These insights aim to assist future MSCA/COFUND applicants in improving project impact and sustainability.

Prevalence and Extent of Industry Funding to Program Directors Across Pediatric Surgical Specialties

IntroductionIndustry funding in surgical education offers benefits but presents conflicts of interest. This study defines the prevalence and extent of industry funding to fellowship program directors (FPDs) across pediatric surgical specialties. Materials and methodsThis was a retrospective cross-sectional analysis of FPDs in pediatric surgical specialties. Data were amalgamated from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services and the Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education. Characteristics of FPDs were obtained from academic websites and medical licensing boards. Personal industry payments from 2016 to 2022 were analyzed, and temporal trends were elucidated. Comparisons were made by year, surgical specialty, and control groups with nonparametric tests. ResultsA total of 241 FPDs were identified, with 206 (85%) receiving industry payments over the study period. The specialties with the highest prevalence of industry funding to FPDs were pediatric orthopedic surgery (100%), pediatric urology (96%), and pediatric surgery (85%). Total industry payments aggregated to $7.3 million dollars with the majority awarded to pediatric orthopedic surgery (91%). Most industry payments were for royalties or licensing (57%) and consulting fees (31%). Median total industry payments per FPD differed between subspecialties (P < 0.001) and was highest in pediatric orthopedic surgery ($7009, interquartile range [IQR], $1771-$50,239) and lowest in pediatric otolaryngology ($116, IQR, $75-$1626). Male FPDs had higher median total industry payments than female FPDs ($1643, IQR, $172-$8731 versus $193, IQR, $84-$712, P < 0.001). ConclusionsIndustry payments to FPDs in pediatric surgical specialties are highly prevalent, but the magnitude varies by specialty. Future work is needed to establish mechanisms that promote equitable partnerships between academia and industry for pediatric surgery training.

Crossing boundaries: developing preservice teachers' professional identity through hybrid school–university partnerships

PurposeSchool–university partnerships are the core of effective teacher preparation programs, and central to this model are the classroom teachers who mentor preservice teachers into the profession. This article describes an innovative collaboration that transcends institutional boundaries, operating in a hybrid space, aimed at supporting preservice teachers' development as educators, expanding their professional networks and fostering their sense of belonging and professional identity within a broader community of teacher leaders.Design/methodology/approachThis article describes a hybrid partnership model that provides preservice teachers with innovative mentoring experiences. Research on hybrid partnership models and boundary-spanning frames the discussion. The article provides a brief overview of two iterations of a collaboration between elementary preservice teachers and a cohort of teacher leaders in a fellowship program. The paper concludes by discussing lessons learned and directions for future research on the topic.FindingsPreservice teachers benefit from opportunities to engage with a variety of mentors throughout their program. While the classroom teacher serving as a mentor is central to teacher preparation, there is a space for hybrid partnership models that provide preservice teachers additional mentors to support their development and connections to a professional learning community of teacher leaders. Through innovative hybrid collaborations, preservice teachers engage with diverse mentors, expanding their professional networks and preparing them to navigate the complexities of the educational landscape with a sense of belonging and identity.Originality/valueThis article contributes to the literature on hybrid partnership models, aimed at empowering preservice teachers by integrating them into a professional community of teacher leaders, fostering their sense of belonging, identity and preparedness to navigate the complexities of the profession.

Report of the First Completed On-site Vascular Neurosurgery Fellowship Program in Cameroon

Background and Aim: Vascular neurosurgical expertise is highly in demand in African countries.To create a sustainable environment for treating the patients, local neurosurgeons have tobe trained and be able to operate under the local circumstances, and equipment and on-sitefellowship programs are needed. We have reported the results of the first completed on-sitecerebrovascular fellowship in Cameroon and to our knowledge, in central Africa. Methods and Materials/Patients: Forty-two cerebrovascular cases (38 aneurysms) wereoperated by the cerebrovascular expert and his fellows microsurgically from April 2021to November 2022. The expert traveled to Cameroon four times. Online conferences andtheoretical courses were organized.Results: The overall morbidity rate was 10.5% with a long-term functional morbidity rate of5.2%. The intraoperative mortality rate was 0 and the 30-day mortality rate was 2.7%. Aftercompletion of the program, the fellow’s surgical skills concerning operating time, intraoperativecomplications, and mortality improved significantly. Conclusion: The on-site cerebrovascular fellowship program in sub-Saharan countries is feasibleand provides the patient with high-quality surgery with outcomes similar to Western countries.The caseload in two years is sufficient enough to provide excellent training to the local fellows.There is a high demand for further fellowships, like the one we described. It is important for thetrainer to stay dedicated to the program until the completion of it. To provide the fellows with ahigh caseload, only two fellows should be trained, which are participating in every case

Forging Futures, Building a Pipeline: Testimonios From a Collective of Diverse MFP Alums in the Southwest

ABSTRACT For 50 years, the Minority Fellowship Program (MFP) has supported social workers in serving diverse communities at risk of mental health issues and substance misuse, training over 1,000 masters and doctoral-level fellows, and preparing them for meaningful community engagement. Through testimonios, we explore the career paths, collaborations, and community involvement of five doctoral-level MFP alums working at a large public R1 university in the Southwest. Reflecting as MFP alums and diverse faculty of color, our testimonios bear witness to MFP’s influence on our antiracist, antioppressive, and decolonial work, our mentorship and recruitment of graduate students of color, and our efforts to build a diverse student pipeline to address mental health and substance misuse within marginalized racial and ethnic communities.

Application of the MENTOR model to advance One Health by promoting bat conservation and reducing zoonotic spillover risk

For few taxonomic groups do conservation efforts have such a disproportionate impact on biodiversity and human well-being as they do with bats. Bats face significant conservation challenges that affect their long-term viability, inhibit their ecosystem functions and services, and increase zoonotic spillover risks. Protecting bat populations and their habitats ultimately reduces these conservation threats, helps prevent pandemics, and supports essential ecosystem services. MENTOR-Bat is a fellowship program focused on strengthening technical research, and leadership capacity in the Global South to promote healthy environments where bats and humans can coexist with reduced risks of pathogen transmission. Co-designed by the United States Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS) and Bat Conservation International (BCI), MENTOR-Bat mirrors the One Health framework by featuring a transdisciplinary team of three mentors and nine fellows from Cameroon, Colombia, and Indonesia. Fellows and mentors receive academic and field-based training on bat ecology and conservation, One Health, human dimensions of conservation, behavior change, strategic communications, international policy, adaptive management, project planning, conservation leadership, and public health. Fellows will then design and implement team pilot projects to advance One Health and bat conservation in their respective countries. Program evaluation of MENTOR-Bat is based on Kirkpatrick’s Hierarchy and focuses on measuring the development of established One Health core competences. By incorporating One Health and conservation within its activities, MENTOR-Bat can become a valuable programmatic template for transdisciplinary programming advancing evidence-based strategies for improving the well-being of bats, humans, and the environment.

Information Disclosure and Competitive Dynamics: Evidence from the Pharmaceutical Industry

This paper studies how competitive dynamics shape innovative firms’ voluntary disclosure of product quality information. Our empirical context is the pharmaceutical industry, where firms must decide whether to disclose private drug quality information acquired in clinical trials. Using a difference-in-difference strategy, we show that the approval of a competitor’s drug lowers the likelihood of a firm reporting its clinical trial results by 13%. We explore how these effects vary based on the project quality, competitor type, and firm experience. These findings suggest that strategic considerations play a role in firms’ disclosure decisions; in response to a competitor’s drug approval, firms may selectively withhold information to maintain and improve their competitive position. This paper was accepted by Joshua Gans, business strategy. Funding: This work was funded by the National Institute on Aging [Grant T32-AG000186] and the UCLA Society of Hellman Fellows Program. Supplemental Material: The online appendix and data files are available at https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2022.01161 .

Evolving Patterns in Inpatient Pediatric Consultations to Allergy/Immunology at an Academic Medical Center

Background: Consultations to pediatric allergy/immunology are of benefit to many hospitalized inpatients, but there is limited current information about how T-cell receptor excision circles (TREC) screening may have changed these patterns for pediatric populations. We aimed to determine the types of consults being requested and their relative frequencies for primary pediatric allergy/immunology consults under an academic fellowship program since the start of TREC screening in 2016. Information gained could help identify focal concepts for pediatric allergy inpatient training curricula for fellowship and graduate medical education programs. Methods: Under an IRB approved study of an academic allergy fellowship consultation log, we retrospectively reviewed electronic medical records of pediatric allergy and immunology consults and categorized consultations by their primary indication. Results: Three-hundred and eighty-three pediatric allergy/immunology consultations were seen between September 4, 2016 to November 24, 2022. In terms of frequency, the most common consultation was for immunodeficiency evaluation or treatment, n=205 (53.5%), followed by drug allergy n=55 (14.4%), general allergy concerns n=43 (11.2%), skin allergy n=35 (9.1%), and less commonly inflammatory syndromes, n=26 (6.8%) and food allergy, n=19 (5.0%). Questions related to TREC screening comprised 21% of all immunodeficiency consults, at n=43. Conclusion: At an academic allergy center where all allergy/immunology service lines are currently provided, the most common reason for pediatric consultations were for help with immunodeficiency evaluation/treatment and drug allergy. TREC screening is a new key indication for consultation. Fellowship programs may benefit from focusing on these content areas for the pediatric inpatient setting.

Global health training opportunities during pediatric hematology/oncology fellowship: Results from a survey of program leaders.

There is growing interest in global health (GH) among medical trainees in the United States. However, providing GH training opportunities at the fellowship level presents several challenges. Understanding of barriers and facilitators to implementing GH training is essential for addressing these challenges. We developed a comprehensive survey of 65 Likert-scale multiple-choice and open-ended questions to assess perspectives of pediatric hematology/oncology fellowships leaders on GH training. The survey was electronically distributed to program leaders at all ACGME-accredited pediatric hematology/oncology fellowships programs, and data were summarized using descriptive analysis. Of 73 eligible programs, we had a 45.2% response rate with 27 complete and 6 partial responses. Respondents represented programs across the United States, including 19 (57.6%) affiliated with NCI-Designated Cancer Centers. Fourteen programs (43.8%) currently offer GH training opportunities, whereas 18 programs expressed interest in future opportunities (15, 83.3%) or plan to offer them soon (3, 16.7%). Major barriers identified include competing training priorities (23, 82.1%), lack of faculty mentors in the division (23, 82.1%), and lack of dedicated institutional funding (20, 71.4%). Key facilitators include the interest and initiative of current fellows (27, 96.4%), dedicated institutional funding (26, 92.8%), and having established international partnerships (26, 92.8%). The study reveals strong interest in GH training in pediatric hematology/oncology fellowships. Despite challenges such as competing priorities and a lack of mentors, significant facilitators include current fellows' initiatives, dedicated funding, and established international partnerships. These insights can help shape future initiatives to incorporate GH into pediatric oncology/hematology fellowship training.

Assessing the Climate Readiness of Physician Education Leaders in Graduate Medical Education.

Climate change affects patient health through an array of exposures, including increasing heatwaves, extreme weather events, poor air quality, and expanding vector-borne illnesses. Physicians are at the forefront of addressing the health consequences of these exposures with patients, and environmental sustainability has become a priority for health care organizations. Accordingly, climate change and health is becoming a critical area for graduate medical education (GME). As GME leaders design and drive education in residency and fellowship programs, understanding those leaders' baseline knowledge on this topic and its alignment with their organizations' priorities is an essential step in the development of climate and health education programs. A search of existing climate and health knowledge assessments revealed an array of tools, yet most had limited applicability for physicians. We systematically created a brief GME climate and health baseline assessment requiring less than 10 minutes of users' time. The assessment was administered anonymously via an online survey tool to GME leaders at three sponsoring institutions across three states within our health care system. Responses from 115 of 155 individuals (74% response rate) yielded an average 62% correct (standard deviation = 16%) and a score range of 10% to 90%. This baseline assessment identifies GME leaders' knowledge gaps about climate change and its impacts on health, the role of health care organizations in producing planet-warming pollution accelerating climate change, and the prioritization of these issues within our organization.

The impact of single-port robotic surgery: a survey among urology residents and fellows in the United States.

Our aim was to investigate the perception and future expectations of Single-Port (SP) surgery among urology trainees in the United States. A 34-item online survey was distributed to urological residency and fellowship programs across the US, covering demographic profiles, SP training opportunities, perceived educational impact, and future perspectives. Descriptive analysis and multivariable linear regression were used to assess predictors of SP adoption. 201 surveys were completed (28.6% completion rate). Among institutions with an SP platform, about 50% have used it regularly for over 2 years, though often in less than 50% of procedures. While robotic simulators are commonly available, only 17% offer both multi-port and SP simulators, and structured pre-clinical SP training is limited. Approximately 30% of respondents expressed concerns over limited hands-on experience and a steeper learning curve with SP. Around 40% felt that their robotic surgery exposure was negatively impacted by SP's introduction. SP surgery's benefits are seen mostly in the immediate post-operative period and a significant number of respondents foresee a major role for SP in urology. However, proficiency in SP surgery is not seen as crucial for career advancement or job opportunities. Academic job aspirations, SP platform availability, and SP surgery workload are predictors of future SP implementation. Trainees increasingly recognize the clinical benefits of SP procedures but express concerns about the potential negative impact on hands-on experience. Training programs should more systematically integrate SP technology into curricula. There is a correlation between training in high-volume SP centers and future SP adoption.

One size does not fit all for URiM applicants: a comparison of NPM program size on URiM applications.

Neonatal-perinatal medicine (NPM) lacks a racially and ethnically diverse physician workforce. Fewer trainees from groups underrepresented in medicine (URiM) are entering NPM due to declining match rates in general pediatrics, financial burdens from delaying workforce entry, and ineffective recruitment into NPM. Annual surveys from the Organization of Neonatology Training Program Directors (ONTPD) were analyzed to assess URiM recruitment trends between 2021 and 2023. Concerningly, the number of URiM candidates applying to NPM fellowship programs remains low, highlighting the need for investment in pathway programming and enhanced recruitment strategies to diversify the NPM workforce. A multifaceted approach, including promoting early interest in pediatrics, minimizing financial disincentives, collecting robust URiM trainee and workforce data, and creating inclusive, diverse educational environments will be critical to increasing URiM representation in NPM and ultimately improving health outcomes for neonates.

Assessing a tertiary surgical units readiness to offer a fellowship in burn care in Africa

The number of patients presenting with burn injuries in Africa is increasing [1,2], and these injuries can have devastating outcomes [3,4]. One contributing factor to these outcomes is the lack of adequately trained staff in providing expert burn wound care. There is little emphasis on training staff in caring for burn patients in Africa. Our goal was to assess the services offered at a specialized burn unit in South Africa and compare them to the recommendations of the American Burn Association for providing fellowship training in burn care. Establishing such a fellowship program will help train experts who can improve burn care services across Africa.