The International Amateur Athletics Federation (IAAF) has escaped the kind of scholarly attention that has been given to the International Federation of Association Football (FIFA) and the International Olympic Committee (IOC). This is surprising because, as Jörg Krieger discusses in this monograph, elements of the organizational histories of the IOC and the IAAF overlap. Nonetheless, Krieger has now rectified this historiographical gap. The picture is not always a pretty one, and without Kreiger's work we may never have seen it at all. As the author discusses in the introduction, the IAAF was tetchy about offering access to its archives in the first place.Krieger's thesis is that the IAAF has been autocratically controlled on behalf of its presidents and that the long arm of history reaches well into the twenty-first century. IAAF presidents’ pronouncements on gender, race, “fair play,” politics, and international relations have been taken as received wisdom, irrespective of any scientific, historical, or ethical truths which might disprove them. Sport economics and cultural tone may have changed since the IAAF's 1913 foundation, and the association has had to adjust to those realities, but even now, it remains (even if recently renamed as the more grandiose World Athletics) a vehicle for its presidents’ ambitions.The author's approach is chronological, with chapters coinciding with IAAF presidents and eras of their reigns. The IAAF was initially formed out of low-key conflict with the IOC over who would act as the world governing body of athletics and how to adjudicate rules. In the end, it was Sweden and the United States who would drive the early creation of the IAAF, creating an arrangement where the IAAF would remain amateur (placating the IOC) while acknowledging the right of national bodies to interpret amateur/professional conflicts for themselves. Swedish industrialist Sigfrid Edström was the first to maneuver his way into the presidency. Notably, when the First World War suspended international sport and IAAF Congress meetings, he rewrote organizational statutes and sacked board members who stood in his way.Krieger argues all subsequent presidents have benefitted from this, with Edström establishing a template for dealing with external threats. Thanks to Edström, it would be the IAAF's role to define gender equality and femininity within athletics. The early success of the French Women's Sporting Federation (FSFSF) led Edström on a ruthless campaign against its general secretary, Alice Milliat, for the purposes of co-opting women's sport under the IAAF banner—thus limiting the number of events women would be allowed to compete in. Edström's successor, English aristocrat David Burghley, accelerated moves begun under Edström for sex testing, with suspicion of “gender fraud” usually being politically and racially motivated. Burghley's humorous comments about women athletes being forced to parade naked for inspection by all-male doctors has clear echoes in current president Sebastian Coe's treatment of the South African runner Caster Semenya.The IAAF also sought to uphold the racial and international relations order. Archival evidence found by Krieger shows Edström's favorable treatment of Nazi Germany may have been linked to his own anti-Semitism. Burghley devised a voting system at IAAF Congresses whereby European and North American nations were given a far greater share of votes. More difficult to prove was that the IAAF appeared to bend the rules on doping to suit influential nations it wanted to keep on its side. The exception to this lack of proof regarding doping, of course, is the Senegalese Lamine Diack, convicted in 2020 of accepting bribes from Russian officials over anti-doping. The inference is clear: not every IAAF president has been treated the same. The flamboyant Primo Nebiolo, president during the 1980s and 1990s, may have had conspicuously expensive taste, but he was also a deft political operator, doing deals to ensure greater power of Global South countries in exchange for buying into his vision of an IAAF based on modern marketing and long-term television contracts. The IAAF's inaugural World Championship in 1983 was itself partly a creation of a marketing push by Horst Dassler of Adidas. Nebiolo thus echoed João Havelange's presidency of FIFA.Krieger believes that the IAAF's/World Athletics’ most consistent sin has been the maintenance of a system that has never placed the welfare of athletes at its heart. In fact, the author views the spectacle of an empty, hot stadium at the 2019 World Athletics Championships in Doha, Qatar, as a fitting monument to IAAF presidents who see in un-democratic nations a reflection of themselves. We await the critical histories of international federations in other sports. In the meantime, we can purchase a copy of Krieger's excellent book for our own university libraries, as he has given one possible template for how they might be written.
Read full abstract