Features Of Brain Organization Research Articles

A study on brain asymmetry in temporal lobe epilepsy

Objective: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) accompanied by hippocampal sclerosis (HS) is the most common type of focal epilepsies. Hemispheric asymmetry is a feature of brain organization in both invertebrates and vertebrates and may be the key to some neurodegenerative diseases. In this context, we aimed to investigate the volumetric asymmetry difference in cerebral structures between TLE patients and the healthy control group, based on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) data that may be used as a new neuroimaging marker for TLE cases. Patients and Methods: In this retrospective study the cranial MRIs of fourteen clinically manifesting, radiologically HS-identified, and diagnosed TLE patients and fourteen healthy individuals from the Radiology Department of Yeditepe University Hospital were evaluated. Volume measurements and asymmetry index (AI) calculations in the total brain, hippocampus, temporal lobe, amygdala, thalamus, nucleus accumbens (NAc), premotor cortex, primary and somatosensory cortices were performed using the medical NeuroQuant® software. A negative AI value represented asymmetry towards the right due to reduced left hemispheric volume; a positive AI value represented asymmetry towards the left due to reduced right hemispheric volume. Subsequently, differences in volume and asymmetric patterns were investigated among TLE subgroups (right and left-sided TLE) and controls. Results: The left-sided TLE patients showed significant bilateral total brain volume reduction compared to the control group. Significant ipsilateral volumetric declines were also detected in the premotor cortex, the temporal lobe, and NAc with remarkable asymmetry to the right side. No significant changes were detected in right-sided TLE patients compared to the other groups. Conclusion: Overall, findings suggest that TLE patients had volumetric alterations with symmetry changes beyond the mesial temporal structures. With further investigations, the asymmetry measures can provide additional knowledge for TLE diagnosis.

Default-mode network streams for coupling to language and control systems.

The human brain is organized into large-scale networks identifiable using resting-state functional connectivity (RSFC). These functional networks correspond with broad cognitive domains; for example, the Default-mode network (DMN) is engaged during internally oriented cognition. However, functional networks may contain hierarchical substructures corresponding with more specific cognitive functions. Here, we used individual-specific precision RSFC to test whether network substructures could be identified in 10 healthy human brains. Across all subjects and networks, individualized network subdivisions were more valid-more internally homogeneous and better matching spatial patterns of task activation-than canonical networks. These measures of validity were maximized at a hierarchical scale that contained ∼83 subnetworks across the brain. At this scale, nine DMN subnetworks exhibited topographical similarity across subjects, suggesting that this approach identifies homologous neurobiological circuits across individuals. Some DMN subnetworks matched known features of brain organization corresponding with cognitive functions. Other subnetworks represented separate streams by which DMN couples with other canonical large-scale networks, including language and control networks. Together, this work provides a detailed organizational framework for studying the DMN in individual humans.

Opportunities and limitations of intrinsic functional connectivity MRI

Intrinsic functional connectivity magnetic resonance imaging (fcMRI) has emerged as a powerful tool for mapping large-scale networks in the human brain. Robust and reliable functionally coupled networks can be detected in individuals that echo many known features of anatomical organization. Features of brain organization have been discovered, including descriptions of distributed large-scale networks interwoven throughout association cortex, interactions (including anticorrelations) between brain networks and insights into the topography of subcortical structures. But interpreting fcMRI is complicated by several factors. Functional coupling changes dynamically, suggesting that it is constrained by, but not fully dictated by, anatomic connectivity. Critically to study of between-group differences, fcMRI is sensitive to head motion and to differences in the mental states of participants during the scans. We discuss the potential of fcMRI in the context of its limitations.

Who's afraid of Homo sapiens?

Understanding how humans differ from other animals, as well as how we are like them, requires comparative investigations. For the purpose of documenting the distinctive features of humans, the most informative research involves comparing humans to our closest relatives–the chimpanzees and other great apes. Psychology and anthropology have maintained a tradition of empirical comparative research on human specializations of cognition. The neurosciences, by contrast, have been dominated by the model-animal research paradigm, which presupposes the commonality of "basic" features of brain organization across species and discourages serious treatment of species differences. As a result, the neurosciences have made little progress in understanding human brain specializations. Recent developments in neuroimaging, genomics, and other non-invasive techniques make it possible to directly compare humans and nonhuman species at levels of organization that were previously inaccessible, offering the hope of gaining a better understanding of the species-specific features of the human brain. This hope will be dashed, however, if chimpanzees and other great ape species become unavailable for even non-invasive research.