Feasibility Of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection Research Articles

Feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection as salvage treatment for patients with local failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy for stage IB, II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer

Local failure after definitive chemoradiotherapy (CRT) for stage IB, II, and III esophageal cancer is one of the causes of poor outcome. Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is an effective treatment for superficial esophageal cancer. However, its feasibility as a salvage treatment for local recurrent or residual tumors after definitive CRT for stage IB, II, and III esophageal cancer remains unclear. Between January 2000 and February 2008, 274 patients with stage IB, II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer excluding T4 received definitive CRT at the National Cancer Center Hospital, Japan. Of these patients, nine patients with local recurrence after achieving complete response and two patients with residual tumor underwent salvage EMR. The technique of salvage EMR involved a strip biopsy method. We retrospectively reviewed the 11 patients (13 lesions). Characteristics of all 11 patients were as follows: median age of 69 (range: 45-78); male/female: 10/1; baseline clinical stage (Union for International Cancer Control 7th) IB/IIA/IIB/III: 1/3/7/0. The depth of resected tumor was limited to the mucosal layer in seven lesions and submucosal in six lesions. En bloc resection was performed on six lesions (46%). The vertical margin was free of cancer cells in 11 lesions (84.6%). No major complications, such as hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion and perforation, were experienced. At a median follow-up period of 38.9 months (range: 5.3-94 months) after salvage EMR, no recurrence was detected in six patients (54%). Local recurrence was detected in five patients (27%). Of these patients, two had lung metastasis simultaneously, and one was also detected lung metastasis 2 months after the detection of local recurrence. The 5-year survival rate after salvage EMR was 41.6%. Salvage EMR is a feasible treatment option for local recurrent or residual lesions after definitive chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy for stage IB, II, and III esophageal squamous cell cancer.

314e: Factors Related to Lymph Node Metastasis and the Feasibility of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treating Early Gastric Cancer

314e: Factors Related to Lymph Node Metastasis and the Feasibility of Endoscopic Mucosal Resection for Treating Early Gastric Cancer

Feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection for superficial pharyngeal cancer: a minimally invasive treatment

New diagnostic techniques have recently been developed so detection of superficial pharyngeal cancer is dramatically increasing and endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) can now be performed on an experimental basis. The aim of this study was to clarify the effectiveness of EMR for superficial pharyngeal cancer. Between 2004 and 2007, 31 patients with 37 pharyngeal lesions underwent EMR at our hospital. EMR using a cap-fitted endoscope (EMR-C) was used on 34 lesions and strip biopsies on the remaining three. We retrospectively assessed the effectiveness of those procedures in treating superficial pharyngeal cancer. Median procedure time was 45 minutes (range 20 - 180 minutes) and median hospital stay was 7 days (range 4 - 12 days). Regarding complications, one patient experienced laryngeal edema, one suffered aspiration pneumonia, and two sustained dermatitis around the mouth caused by Lugol staining. Histologically, 18 lesions were confirmed as carcinoma in situ and the other 19 lesions demonstrated microinvasion of the subepithelial tissue with lymphatic invasion in one case. During the median follow-up period of 40 months (range 21 - 62 months), two patients received radiotherapy and two patients underwent an additional EMR because of recurrent tumors. Five other patients developed metachronous superficial pharyngeal cancers, but all those lesions were resected primarily by EMR while two of the study's 31 patients died from esophageal cancer. None of the remaining 20 patients experienced any recurrent or metachronous tumors during their follow-up periods. Our results indicated that EMR was a safe, effective, and minimally invasive treatment for superficial pharyngeal cancer.

Factors related to lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection for treating poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomach

Endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) is currently not accepted as an alternative treatment to surgery in early gastric cancer (EGC) of the undifferentiated histologic type. The present retrospective analysis examined the correlation of various histologic factors with the presence of lymph node metastasis (LNM). A retrospective analysis on 234 patients with poorly differentiated EGC who underwent radical gastrectomy with D2 lymph node dissection was undertaken. Several clinicopathologic factors were investigated to identify predictive factors for LNM: age, sex, type of operation, tumor location, tumor size, gross type, ulceration, lymphatic invasion, and depth of invasion. Of the 234 lesions with poorly differentiated EGC, half (n = 116) already showed submucosal invasion in the resection specimen; 25.9 % of those (30/116) were limited to the upper third (SM1). Of the lesions confined to the mucosa, LNM was found in 3.4 % (4/118). With minor submucosal infiltration (SM1), the LNM rate was lower (0/30) in our patient population. Only with SM2/3 infiltration did the LNM rate sharply rise to around 30 %. The cut-off for submucosal infiltration depth was 500 microm (0/32 LNM), above which LNM rates were substantial (31.2 %; 24/77). There was limited correlation between the SM1-3 classification and actual measurement of submucosal infiltration depth. In a multivariate analysis, tumor size ( P = 0.033), depth of invasion ( P = 0.004), and lymphatic invasion ( P < 0.001) were associated with LNM. Poorly differentiated EGC confined to the mucosa or with minimal submucosal infiltration (<or= 500 microm) could be considered for curative EMR due to the low risk of LNM. Given the limited case number of subgroups, these findings should be confirmed by more data from other centers, which should also focus on local recurrence after EMR in poorly differentiated EGC.

Commentaire de travail de D. Park et al., pp. 7

See also: Factors related to lymph node metastasis and the feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection for treating poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma of the stomachEndoscopy 2008; 40(01): 7-10DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-966750

Small ultrasonic probes for determination of the depth of superficial esophageal cancer

Background: In esophageal cancer it is important to distinguish between mucosal cancer and cancer invading the submucosa to determine the feasibility of endoscopic mucosal resection. Methods: Endoscopic ultrasonography using a small probe 2.6 mm in diameter at 15 or 20 MHz frequency was employed to determine the depth of superficial esophageal cancer invasion in 54 patients. Group 1 consisted of 17 cases treated by endoscopic mucosal resection on the basis of ultrasonographic findings. Group II included 37 patients treated by conventional surgery. The resected specimens were compared with ultrasonographic findings. Results: The normal esophageal wall was depicted as having nine layers, the fourth hypoechoic layer (m4) on the high frequency image was confirmed to be the muscularis mucosa. Based on the ultrasound findings, cancer limited to the lamina propria was accurately determined in 84%. In the endoscopic mucosal resection cases, 15 were mucosal cancer whereas 2 cases had microscopic invasion of the submucosa. Conclusions: High-frequency ultrasound probes were sufficiently accurate for the determination of the depths of invasion of early esophageal cancer to guide the application of endoscopic resection of mucosal cancer. (Gastrointest Endosc 1996;44:23-8.)