Fear Of Progression Questionnaire Research Articles

Mediation Effects of Self-care Self-efficacy and Health-promoting Behaviors on Fear of Cancer Recurrence and Posttraumatic Growth in Postoperative Patients With Cervical Cancer: A Cross-sectional Study

PurposeThe high recurrence risks significantly contribute to poor health outcomes among postoperative cervical cancer patients. This study aimed to determine the impact of fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) on the posttraumatic growth (PTG) in postoperative cervical cancer patients and to investigate the medicating effects of self-care self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors within this relationship. MethodsA total of 334 cervical cancer patients who undergone surgery in three tertiary hospitals in Liaoning Province, China, were recruited using a convenience sampling method. Data were collected using the general information questionnaire, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (fear of cancer recurrence), the Post-traumatic Growth Inventory (PTG), the Strategies Used by People to Promote Health (self-care self-efficacy), and the Health-Promoting Lifestyle Profile (health-promoting behaviors). Data analysis was performed using descriptive analysis, Pearson correlations, and multiple linear regression analysis. A structural equation model was conducted using Amos 24.0 software. ResultsPTG of cervical cancer patients after surgery was significantly and negatively associated with fear of cancer recurrence (r = -.54, P < .001), while positively correlated with self-care self-efficacy (r = .51, P < .001) and health-promoting behaviors (r = .59, P < .001). The mediation model revealed that self-care self-efficacy (Boots 95% CI [-0.39, -0.15]) and health-promoting behaviors (Boots 95% CI: [-0.51, -0.24]) independently served as mediating factors, respectively. Self-care self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors played a significant chain mediating effect between fear of cancer recurrence and PTG (Boots CI: [-0.19, -0.07]), with an indirect effect of 11.6%. ConclusionsThis study demonstrated that self-care self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors partially mediated the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence and PTG in cervical cancer survivors after surgery. Implementing tailored interventions focused on enhancing self-care self-efficacy and health-promoting behaviors among cervical cancer survivors may help alleviate concerns about cervical cancer recurrence and enhance PTG following surgery.

Prevalence and Predictors of Fatigue among Thai Women after COVID-19 Infection.

Several people suffered from fatigue after recovering from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). However, limited studies focused on fatigue in women who recovered from COVID-19 infection. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of fatigue among Thai women after COVID-19 infection and to identify predictive factors, including depression, anxiety, fear, and insomnia. A cross-sectional research design using convenience sampling was conducted from October 2022 to January 2023. A total of 142 Thai women after COVID-19 infection were recruited from two urban communities located in the Bangkok Metropolitan area, Thailand. The participants completed self-reported questionnaires, including the demographic and illness-related data questionnaire, the Depress Anxiety Stress Scales, the Insomnia Severity Index, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and the Fatigue Severity Scale. Data were analyzed using mean, standard deviation, range, Pearson's product-moment correlations, and stepwise multiple regression. All (100%) participants returned the questionnaires. After recovering from COVID-19 infection for at least 1 month or longer, 39.40% of the participants reported fatigue. The multiple regression analysis revealed that fear, anxiety, and insomnia collectively contributed to 47% of the variance in the participants' fatigue (R2 = 0.47; p < 0.001). Nearly two-quarters of Thai women after recovering from COVID-19 infection experienced fatigue. To prevent fatigue among Thai women after COVID-19 infection, it is necessary to help them overcome feelings of fear and anxiety. Furthermore, nursing interventions aiming to alleviate insomnia should be implemented.

Post-Cancer Treatment-Related Symptom Distress and Fear of Cancer Recurrence in Colorectal Cancer Survivors

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a primary cause of cancer-related mortality, and, after treatment, cancer survivors often worry that disease recurrence may worsen their health. Nevertheless, limited research on fear of cancer recurrence (FCR) and treatment-related symptoms has been conducted on survivors of CRC. This study was designed to explore (1) symptom distress severity and post-treatment FCR in CRC survivors and (2) the predictors of FCR. A cross-sectional correlational research design and convenience sampling approach were used to recruit patients at the colorectal surgery outpatient department of a medical center in central Taiwan. Basic demographic data, the Symptom Distress Scale - Chinese Modified Form, and Fear of Progression Questionnaire - Short Form were used as monitoring tools. Pearson's product-moment correlation analysis, independent t-tests, one-way ANOVA, and stepwise linear regression analysis were used for statistical analysis. One hundred fourteen survivors of CRC with an average age of 63.44 were enrolled as participants. The top five symptoms of distress were numbness, bowel patterns, fatigue, insomnia, and dry mouth, and the average FCR score was 18.09. Gender, educational level, monthly disposable income, and symptom distress were identified as significant predictors of FCR, with an overall explanatory power of 41.4%. Level of post-treatment FCR in survivors of CRC is influenced by symptom distress severity. Early intervention by healthcare providers to control or alleviate physical symptoms can help prevent the emergence of negative emotions and improve quality of life in this patient group.

Coping strategies mediate the relationship between fear of cancer recurrence and quality of life in postoperative patients with prostate cancer: a multicentre survey

PurposeThe aim of the present study was to investigate the relationships between fear of cancer recurrence and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer. A model based on Lazarus’ and Folkman’s theory tested the specific hypothesis: fear of cancer recurrence has a direct and indirect effect on quality of life mediated by coping strategies.MethodsA questionnaire survey was conducted on 305 patients with prostate cancer who underwent radical surgery, including demographic information, FoP-Q-SF (Fear of Progression Questionnaire), MCMQ (The Medical Coping Modes Questionnaire), QLQ-C30 (Questionnaire for Quality of Life Assessment in patients with cancer, version 3.0), and a mediator model was tested using the PROCESS macro for SPSS.ResultsThe total FoP-Q-SF score of 305 postoperative prostate cancer patients was 34.3 ± 5.856, with approximately 41.6% of the patients scoring higher than 34. There were significant indirect effects of fear of cancer recurrence on global health status through face [a1b1; 0.0394, Boot CIs 0.0025, 0.0819] and yield [a3b3; -0.1075, Boots CIs − 0.1657, -0.0557] but not for evasive [a2b2; 0.0235; Boots CIs − 0.057, 0.0508].ConclusionsCoping strategies are the most important mediating factors between fear of cancer recurrence and QOL among patients with prostate cancer. Our results support the proposed conceptual model, based on Lazarus’ and Folkman’s theory. Medical personnel need to develop corresponding intervention measures based on the different coping methods of patients, promote disease recovery, and improve postoperative quality of life.

Fear of Cancer Progression: A Comparison between the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-12) and the Concerns about Recurrence Questionnaire (CARQ-4).

As cancer patients often suffer from fear of cancer progression (FoP), valid screening for FoP is of high relevance. The aims of this study were to test psychometric properties of two FoP questionnaires, to determine their relationship to other anxiety-related constructs, and to analyze the impact of sociodemographic and clinical factors on the FoP. Our sample consisted of n = 1733 patients with mixed cancer diagnoses. For measuring FoP, the Fear of Progression questionnaire (FoP-Q-12) and the Concerns About Cancer Recurrence Questionnaire (CARQ-4) were used. The mean scores of the FoP-Q-12 and the CARQ-4 were 30.0 ± 10.4 and 16.1 ± 10.8, respectively, indicating relatively high levels of FoP. Both questionnaires showed excellent internal consistency coefficients, α = 0.895 and α = 0.915, respectively. The correlation between the two FoP questionnaires was r = 0.72. Female patients reported more FoP than male patients (d = 0.84 and d = 0.54, respectively). There was a nonlinear age dependency of FoP, with an increase found in the age range from 18 to 50 years and a decrease in the older age range. Radiation, chemotherapy, and antibody therapy, but not surgery, lead to an increase in FoP. Both questionnaires show good psychometric properties and can be recommended for use in an oncological routine. Female patients and patients in the middle-age range deserve special attention from healthcare providers.

The development and validation of the Worries About Recurrence or Progression Scale (WARPS).

Worry about recurrence or progression is a common concern among people with chronic physical illnesses. Although there are options to measure the fear of cancer recurrence and other illness-specific measures, there is only one transdiagnostic measure of fear of progression, which does not assess the fear of recurrence or relapse. A multi-phase study outlining the development and validation of a novel transdiagnostic measure of fear of recurrence or progression, the Worries About Recurrence and Progression Scale (WARPS). From a prior systematic review, we used quotes from people with lived experience to generate 55 items. Next, we piloted the items with 10 people with a range of chronic conditions, leading to a final total of 57 items. We then recruited four groups of people with cardiac disease, rheumatic disease, diabetes and respiratory disease (n = 804). An exploratory factor analysis in a randomly split sample resulted in an 18 item, single factor scale. We then performed confirmatory factor analysis on these 18 items in the remaining sample. The 18-item WARPS demonstrated good construct validity, internal consistency and test-retest reliability. Specifically, the WARPS was strongly correlated with the Fear of Progression Questionnaire, and with illness-specific fears. Significant, moderate correlations were observed with depression, anxiety, stress, and death anxiety. The WARPS demonstrated the validity and reliability amongst people with four of the most common chronic conditions and the factor structure was invariant across genders. The WARPS is a valid and reliable tool to measure transdiagnostic worries about recurrence and progression.

Fear of progression, imagery, interpretation bias, and their relationship with endometriosis pain.

Endometriosis is a chronic gynaecological condition, of which pain is both the most common and most debilitating symptom. As with other forms of pain, there is increasing recognition of the role of psychological processes in bridging the gap between pain and pain impact, and yet these processes are not well understood in endometriosis. The aim of this study was to investigate the relevance of fear of progression, imagery, and interpretation bias in endometriosis, and their contribution to pain interference. A total of 221 participants (mean age = 38 years, SD = 7.8) with endometriosis were recruited from Endometriosis Australia. This cross-sectional study included relevant demographics and endometriosis characteristics; questionnaires to measure fear of progression, imagery, interpretation bias, and pain; and the word association task to measure interpretation bias. Participants reported high scores on the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (M = 38/60), higher than that has been found in cancer. Controlling for age and pain intensity, we found that imagery, interpretation bias, and their interaction were associated with increased fear of progression and that fear of progression was associated with greater pain-related interference. In exploratory analysis, we also found that the frequency and distress of endometriosis-related intrusive imagery were associated with greater fear of progression and pain interference, after controlling for age and pain intensity. These findings provide the first support of the importance of fear of progression in people with endometriosis and suggest possible pathways for causal investigation.

Is ‘Hold Me Tight’ Relationship Enhancement Program Effective in Reducing Fear of Progression in Iranian Married Women with Breast Cancer?

Patients with chronic diseases such as cancer are permanently worried about the progression or recurrence of their diseases. This fear of cancer spreading severely affects a patient’s quality of emotional and marital life. Therefore, this study investigates the effectiveness of the Hold Me Tight (HMT) Relationship Enhancement Program – an EFT-based intervention – on Fear of Progression (FoP) in married women coping with breast cancer. This was a quasi-experimental pre-test–post-test design study with experimental and control groups. Twenty-two couples were recruited and selected purposively among a population of married female patients diagnosed with stage II breast cancer. The couples were assigned into experimental and control groups, each containing 11 couples. The intervention group couples received a 6-session HMT training, and the women in both groups completed the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q ) as pre-test and post-test. We used analysis of covariance to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention. The statistical analysis results indicated that the mean score of FoP decreased in the experimental group compared to the control group. However, the ANCOVA results revealed no significant difference between the means, showing that the implementation of the HMT intervention program had no significant decreasing effect on FoP dimensions in the intervention group women as compared to the control group (p&amp;lt;0.05). We suggested the consideration of age, relationship satisfaction, the level of FoP before the intervention, cancer stage, and the level of improvement in deciding to use EFT in reducing FoP.

Health-related quality of life of advanced prostate cancer patients and spouses: results from actor-partner interdependence models

BackgroundPatients with prostate cancer (PC) and their spouses are confronted with several treatment-related and psychosocial challenges that can reduce their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Patients with advanced PC (aPC) and their spouses are at highest risk for psychological distress and show lower HRQoL compared with couples in other phases. The aim of this study was to investigate the psychological interdependencies between HRQoL and anxiety, fear of progression (FoP), and depression in patients with aPC and their spouses.MethodsNinety-six heterosexual couples with aPC participated in this cross-sectional study. Patients and spouses provided information about anxiety and depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-4), fear of progression (short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire), and HRQoL (EORTC QoL-C30, version 3). Psychological interdependencies were analyzed with various actor-partner interdependence models using structural equation modeling.ResultsAnxiety, FoP, and depression were significant predictors of HRQoL for patients with aPC and their spouses (actor effects). Spouses’ anxiety and FoP were negatively associated with patients’ HRQoL (partner effects), showing that patients’ HRQoL is associated with their own and their spouses’ anxiety and FoP. No partner effect was revealed between depression and HRQoL in the patients or spouses.ConclusionsThe resulted partner effects between spouses and patients underline the importance of considering HRQoL in patients with aPC from a dyadic perspective. It is important that physicians explore patients’ and spouses’ needs and psychological burden to offer support and access to psycho-oncological services. Future studies are needed to investigate the effects of suitable interventions on spouses’ anxiety and FoP.

The role of wisdom and self-management skills for coping with fear of progression among patients with multiple sclerosis with moderate disability: Results from a cross-sectional study

• Wisdom is a field of growing interest both inside and outside academic psychology. • Fear of progression (FoP) is a widely underdiagnosed and untreated problem in MS. • This study focused on identifying wisdom and self-management skills related to FoP. • Age is the strongest predictor for FoP-Q, not disease duration or disease severity. • Emotional regulation, self-observation, and self-efficacy are crucial factors. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic neurological disease with an uncertain course. Wisdom and self-management are skills that can be used to cope with uncertainty and unpredictable life stresses. The present study aims to identify relevant wisdom and self-management skills for coping with fear of progression (FoP), a widely underdiagnosed real-life fear in response to uncertainty and a risk factor for depression and anxiety in patients with MS (PwMS). Ninety-two German inpatients aged 24–64 years with predominantly relapsing–remitting MS (72,8%) were included in this study. Correlation analyses and blockwise regression analyses were conducted to evaluate the relationship between wisdom skills (Self-Assessed Wisdom Scale, SAWS) and self-management skills (Questionnaire to Assess Resources and Self-management Skills, FERUS) with FoP (Fear of Progression-Questionnaire, FoP-Q), while controlling for demographic and disease-related variables. Blockwise regression analyses (BRA) revealed the following significant unique predictions for each FoP-Q subscale: age (R change = 0.043), emotional regulation (0.028), and self-efficacy (0.029) on affective reaction ; age (0.087) on partnership/family ; age (0.055) and self-observation (0.043) on occupation ; age (0.040) , fatigue (0.057), and self-observation (0.039) on loss of autonomy . The cross-sectional design, lack of comparison groups, and exclusive use of self-reports limit the generalizability of this study. Age is the strongest predictor for FoP-Q. Emotional regulation (as wisdom skills), self-observation and self-efficacy (as self-management skills), and fatigue are critical factors in dealing with specific aspects of FoP for PwMS. Larger, prospective, and longitudinal designed studies are needed to specify and replicate the results.

Association Between Daily Worry, Pathological Worry, and Fear of Progression in Patients With Cancer.

Background: Fear of progression (FoP), or fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), is characterized by worries or concerns about negative illness-related future events. Actually, to worry is a common cognitive process that, in its non-pathological form, belongs to daily life. However, worry can also become pathological appearing as a symptom of mental disorders. This study aimed at investigating the associations among daily worry, pathological worry, and FoP in patients with cancer.Methods: This is a cross-sectional study that includes 328 hospitalized patients with cancer. Patients filled out the FoP Questionnaire (FoP-Q), the Worry Domains Questionnaire (WDQ) for the assessment of daily worry, and the Penn State Worry Questionnaire (PSWQ) for the assessment of pathological worry. Depressive, anxiety, and somatic symptoms were measured with modules of the Patient Health Questionnaire [Patient Health Questionnaire-Depressive Symptoms (PHQ-2), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-2 (GAD-2), and Patient Health Questionnaire-Somatic Symptoms (PHQ-15)]. Furthermore, a structured clinical interview was conducted for the assessment of anxiety disorders. The hierarchical multiple linear regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with FoP.Results: Mean age of the participants was M = 58.5 years (SD = 12.8), and 64.6% were men. FoP and worry were significantly intercorrelated (r = 0.58–0.78). The level of FoP was most strongly associated with daily worry (β = 0.514, p < 0.001), followed by pathological worry (β = 0.221, p < 0.001). Further significant determinants were younger age and depressive and anxiety symptoms. Clinical variables were not independently associated with FoP. The final model explained 74% of the variance.Discussion: Fear of progression is strongly associated with daily worry and pathological worry. These results bring up the question of whether FoP is an expression of a general tendency to worry. Whether a general tendency to worry, in fact, represents an independent vulnerability factor for experiencing FCR/FoP needs to be investigated in a longitudinal research design.

Are women more afraid than men? Fear of recurrence in couples with cancer – predictors and sex-role-specific differences

Purpose Although fear of cancer recurrence (FoR) is one of the major concerns in cancer patients and their partners with approximately 49% reporting moderate to high FoR, few studies investigated predictors and sex-role-specific differences. The aim of the current study was to investigate FoR in couples with different types of cancer and to gain a deeper understanding of sex and role-specific differences and predictors of FoR in patients and partners. Design Cross-sectional study in Germany. Sample: N = 188 couples with prostate (PC; n=52), laryngeal (LC; n=21) or breast cancer (BC; n=115) participated. All PC and LC patients were males, all BC patients were females. Methods Fear of recurrence, depression, and relationship satisfaction were measured with validated questionnaires (Fear of Progression Questionnaire, Patient Health Questionnaire, Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Quality of Marriage Index) in couples with PC, LC, or BC. Findings Results indicated sex-role-specific differences. For women, FoR was higher for patients (M = 35.76) than for caregivers (M = 27.11). For males, spouses of women with BC (M = 30.1) showed higher FoR than male PC or LC patients (M = 24.9). Moreover, in couples there was a correlation between the FoR of one and the other (PC: r = .51, BC: r = .31, LC: r = .41). Depression was as a significant predictor, with a positive relationship to FoR. Moreover, in men with PC and LC besides depression, age emerged as significant predictor with a negative relationship to FoR. The Actor-Partner-Interdependence-Model showed for couples with PC or LC significant actor effects, both for patients and partners. Moreover, a significant partner effect emerged for patients’ depression on partners’ FoR. For couples with BC only significant actor effects occurred. Conclusions FoR remains a major concern for both cancer patients and their partners. Implications for Psychosocial Providers or Policy: FoR should be considered both in cancer patients and their spouses. In addition, sex and role effects should be taken into account in treatment of FoR.

Validation of the English and simplified Mandarin versions of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire \u2013 Short Form in Chinese cancer survivors

BackgroundThe fear of illness progression is common amongst those with chronic illnesses including cancers, and contributes to high psychological morbidity. Research in Asia on such fears however, is limited by a paucity of validated measurement instruments. Amongst the many available instruments, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire has a high quality rating, an important consideration in its selection. This study developed a simplified Mandarin version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire – Short Form (FoP-Q-SF), and validated the English and Mandarin versions for use in Chinese populations.MethodsThe translation to a simplified Mandarin version was through a forward-backward translation with emphasis on conceptual and cultural equivalence. Cancer survivors (N = 341) completed a self-report questionnaire, the Fear of Progression Questionnaire – Short Form, other measures of fear of progression, depression, anxiety, and quality of life. Reliability and criterion validity were assessed, and the factor-structure was replicated with a confirmatory factor analysis.ResultsThe Fear of Progression Questionnaire – Short Form demonstrated high internal and test-retest reliability. Criterion validity was also demonstrated through convergent, concurrent and discriminant validity. The factor structure was supported and replicated. The goodness-of-fit indices of the original model indicated some misfit, which could be adequately addressed by freeing five parameters in the error covariance matrix, without changing the one-factor structure.ConclusionsThe Fear of Progression Questionnaire – Short Form is a reliable and valid measure of fear of progression applicable to a mixed-cancer survivor population in Singapore. The simplified Mandarin version of the questionnaire will be useful in other parts of Asia and for Chinese migrants in the West, further extending the use of this questionnaire.

Do different treatment strategies influence women’s level of psychosexual distress? Observational cohort study of women with premalignant HPV-associated genital lesions

ObjectiveTo examine the impact of different treatment strategies - surgical treatment or watchful waiting- on sexual activity, psychosocial distress, and fear of progression in women with Human Papillomavirus (HPV)-associated premalignant genital lesions. Study designObservational cohort study of women diagnosed with HPV-associated premalignant lesions of the cervix, vagina or vulva. Patients were stratified into two groups depending on the severity of their premalignancy: surgical treatment or watchful waiting. Validated patient administered questionnaires, i.e. Fear of Progression questionnaire (FoP-Q), Cervical Dysplasia Distress Questionnaire (CDDQ), and Sexual Activity Questionnaire (SAQ) were completed after clinical evaluation (baseline), at 6- and 12-months follow-ups. Results209 women treated with surgery (N = 125) were compared with women who were monitored in regular intervals (N = 82). During an observational period of 12 months there were no significant differences in fear of progression, psychosocial distress, and sexual activity (p > 0.05). The level of concerns and anxiety about the future, and fear of progression were present, mostly at baseline. While there was a small increase of tension from visit to visit in both groups, patients generally were able to cope with their clinical situation quite well. ConclusionsFear of progression, psychosocial distress and sexual activity in women with precancerous HPV- associated premalignant genital lesions seem to be independent from type of treatment. Both treatment strategies may be applied without major psychological sequelae, as long as adequate information is provided.

Assessment of Cancer-Related Dysfunctional Beliefs about Sleep for Evaluating Sleep Disturbance in Cancer Patients

Dysfunctional beliefs about sleep may be associated with chronic sleep disturbance in patients afflicted with cancer over the trajectory of their battle with cancer. The objective of this study was exploration of the utility of assessing the sleep disturbances suffered by cancer patients possibly emanating from two cancer-related informationally valid but nonetheless dysfunctional beliefs: “My immune system will have serious problems if I don’t go to sleep at a certain time (question 1)” and “If I don’t sleep well at night, my cancer can recur or metastasize (question 2).” The scores for these beliefs were significantly correlated with insomnia severity [measured using the Insomnia Severity Index (p < 0.01)] and fear of disease progression [measured using the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (p < 0.01)]. The question 2 score also correlated with younger age (p = 0.01) and high depression scores assessed using the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (p = 0.04). We believe the scores for these two cancer-related dysfunctional beliefs can be used to help evaluate sleep disturbances in cancer patients. Key words: Insomnia, Cancer, Sleep, Sleep-related cognition

New insights into frequency and contents of fear of cancer progression/recurrence (FOP/FCR) in outpatients with colorectal carcinoma (CRC) receiving oral capecitabine: a pilot study at a comprehensive cancer center.

BackgroundFear of cancer progression/recurrence (FOP/FCR) is considered one of the most prevalent sources of distress in cancer survivors and associated with lower quality of life and functional impairment. Detailed measures of FOP/FCR are needed because little is known about the knowledge of FOP/FCR, its associations with the patient–doctor relationship, and the rate of adequate therapy. Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most prevalent cancer entities, and oral capecitabine is widely prescribed as treatment. Therefore, we initiated a pilot study to expand the literature on FOP/FCR in CRC outpatients receiving capecitabine and to generate hypotheses for future investigations.MethodsThis study included 58 patients treated at a comprehensive cancer center. FOP/FCR was assessed with the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FOP-Q-SF). Satisfaction with the relationships with doctors was assessed with the Patient–Doctor Relationship Questionnaire-9 (PRDQ-9). Levels of side effects were rated by the patients on a visual analog scale. Clinical data were extracted from the charts.ResultsA total of 19 out of 58 patients (36%) suffered from FOP/FCR according to our assessment. Levels of FOP/FCR seemed to be mostly moderate to high. Only four out of the 19 distressed patients (21%) were treated accordingly. Typical side effects of oncological treatment were associated with higher FOP/FCR. Satisfaction with doctor–patient relationships was not associated with FOP/FCR. Regarding single items of FOP/FCR, three out of the five most prevalent fears were associated with close relatives.DiscussionFOP/FCR occurred frequently in more than one in three patients, but was mostly untreated in this sample of consecutive outpatients with CRC receiving oral capecitabine. In detail, most fears were related to family and friends. In addition to an unmet need of patients, our data indicate sources of distress not considered thus far. If replicated in larger studies, results may help to inform intervention development and improve patient care.

Self-assessments and determinants of HRQoL in a German MS population.

The importance of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in multiple sclerosis (MS) is widely acknowledged. In 2015, a multicenter study was launched to assess the HRQoL and coping styles of chronically ill persons in Germany. The aims of this paper were (i) to describe how persons affected by MS assess their HRQoL and (ii) find out sociodemographic and disease-specific determinants of HRQoL. A quantitative survey (optionally per paper-pencil or online) was conducted between March and October 2015 in Germany. Recruitment ways were as follows: Associations of the German Multiple Sclerosis Society (DMSG), medical practices specialized in neurology/MS, hospitals, public events, social networks, and self-help clearinghouses. To measure HRQoL, the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life (MusiQoL) questionnaire and the short form of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q) were used. A total of 1220 individuals with MS participated in the study. Frequent problems reported were related to activities of daily living as well as sentimental and sexual life. Multiple regression analyses identified disease severity and comorbidity-in different directions (positive and negative)-as the strongest factors in predicting activities of daily living, symptoms, sentimental and sexual life, and reject. The demographic variables sex, age, education, and employment status also have different impact on the HRQoL. Using HRQoL measures can be feasible outcomes in addition to clinical assessments of MS and other chronic diseases and can help better managing the care. Some challenges have to be taken into account involving patients and the limitations of our empirical study.

Cognitive-Behavioral Group Therapy Addressing Fear of Progression in Cancer Out-Patients

Fear of progression (FoP) is an appropriate, rational response to the real threat of cancer and its treatments. However, patients experiencing elevated, dysfunctional levels of FoP often feel severely distressed and are in need of treatment. We previously conducted a (partly-)randomized controlled study with cancer patients undergoing in-patient rehabilitation and showed that a brief, four-session cognitive-behavioral group therapy significantly reduced dysfunctional FoP. In this report, we describe the adaption of the cognitive-behavioral group therapy program for use with cancer out-patients. This group therapy program was conducted in the psycho-oncological out-patient department of a large university hospital. It comprises 6 group sessions lasting 90 min each. Because of the larger number of sessions there is more room for the use of exposure-based techniques. Imaginal exposure is used to confront the patient's cancer-related fears and worries. Patients are asked to vividly recount their worries and to think of what would be the worst that can happen (worst-case scenario exercise). In addition, interventions that focus the patient's ressources are applied. The completion of 3 group therapies in the pilot phase supported the feasibility of the program. Pre-post evaluation (n=10) revealed a significant decline of FoP (Fear of Progression Questionnaire, FoP-Q) from M=12,0 (SD=2,0) to M=10,3 (SD=1,7), p=0.029. This represents a large effect (Cohen's d=0.9). Three out of 14 participants (21%) quit treatment after 2 sessions. In sum, the results and our experiences show that this out-patient group therapy program is feasible and probably effective. However, it also shows that some patients regard confronting their cancer-related fears and worries as too stressful. High ambivalence with regard to exposure seems to increase the risk for premature termination. Thus, cancer patients should be thoroughly educated before starting exposure-based treatment of dysfunctional FoP.

Fear of progression in patients with low-risk malignant melanoma.

e21615 Fear of progression in patients with low-risk malignant melanoma Fear of cancer progression (FoP) is one of the problems most commonly reported by cancer patients and is among the most prevalent cancer-related worries in cancer survivors. FCR is highly variable in different cancer entities. Background: This study aimed to elicit the prevalence and significance of FCR in melanoma patients with low risk tumors and further to assess psychosocial and demographic factors predicting severity of FoP as well as to determine the impact of FoP on quality of life (QoL). Methods: In total, 133 patients with low-risk melanoma (pT1a) completed the short version of the Fear of Progression Questionnaire (FoP-Q-SF), the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), and the EQ-5D questionnaire, as well as self-constructed questions on the socio-demographic background. Results: MeanFoP-Q-SF sum score was 30.1 points (± 8.4 points SD) and the median 29 points. Two thirds of patients deviated not more than 1 SD from the mean. Risk factors for elevated FoP were female gender (p &lt; 0.01), young age (p = 0.04) and working (p = 0.02) patients and patients with severe comorbidities (p = 0.03). Cancer in closely related persons predicted higher FoP (p &lt; 0.01). HADS anxiety scale (r = 0.49, p &lt; 0.01) and depression scale (r = 0.26, p &lt; 0.01) correlated with FoP. A negative correlation with the EQ-5D index was found (r = -0.34, p &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: As in many other malignancies,FoP is prevalent in low-risk melanoma patients and is associated with reduced QoL. Severe comorbidities, cancer in related persons, gender and income could be identified as predictors of FoP. Considerable high levels of FoP even in patients with low-risk malignancies underline the need of psychosocial support and intervention for special subgroups of melanoma patients to enable the patient to manage FoP more successfully.

Quality of Life and Anxiety in Younger Patients after Biological versus Mechanical Aortic Valve Replacement

Background Since biological valve recipients are likely to need a redo procedure in the future for valve deterioration, we hypothesized patients might be more fearful about the progression of their disease than patients after aortic valve replacement (AVR) with a mechanical valve. The aim of this study is to compare the quality of life (QOL) and anxiety in patients who have undergone biological versus mechanical AVR. Method A total of 56 patients after mechanical AVR (mean age: 64.4 ± 8.17 years) and 66 patients after biological AVR (mean age: 64.8 ± 11.05 years) received three questionnaires 5.66 (± 2.68) years after surgery, including: The short form-36 (SF-36) to assess QOL, the fear of progression questionnaire (FOP), and the cardiac anxiety questionnaire (CAQ) to assess general anxiety, anxiety related to cardiac symptoms, and anxiety about progression of heart disease and valve and anticoagulation-specific questions. Results No significant differences were found for all categories of the SF-36. The FOP showed significantly favorable values for the biological AVR group. The CAQ showed a tendency in the subscale "avoidance" (i.e., avoidance of pulse increase) and "attention" towards more favorable values for the biological AVR group. Conclusions In contrast to our hypothesis, patients after mechanical AVR show significantly higher anxiety values for the FOP, and a tendency toward higher values for "avoidance" (i.e., avoidance of pulse increase). Partnership concerns, especially in terms of sexuality can be explained by factors that are recognizable for the partner, such as valve sound. These data provide evidence that factors that are continuously present after mechanical AVR, such as valve sound or anticoagulation might affect wellbeing stronger than the certainty of reoperation in the future after biological AVR. We conclude that implantation of a biological prosthesis can be justified in younger patients with regards to QOL.