Fatigue Strength Of Ductile Iron Research Articles

Fatigue Strength of Ductile Iron in Ultra-High Cycle Regime

Machine and equipment safety is the most essential factor that determines the choice of a particular material used in the construction phase. Failure analyses in engineering praxis demonstrate that nearly 90 % of all cases of failures are caused by fatigue. For popular technical applications such as cars and trains, the durability expected for some components ranges from 108to 1010loading cycles. However, only few studies have been carried out for more than 107cycles. The SN curve in the ultra-wide life region must be determined in order to ensure actual fatigue strength and safety of these components. This paper presents the results obtained from fatigue tests carried out by means of a high-frequency fatigue testing machine for the three grades of ductile iron: with ferritic-pearlitic matrix (GGG50), with pearlitic-ferritic matrix (GGG60) and ADI cast iron in the range from 106up to 1010cycles.

Effects of casting defects, matrix structures and loading conditions on the fatigue strength of ductile irons

A novel method is presented to estimate the lower bound of the scatter in fatigue limit of ductile iron based upon the information of microstructural in homogeneities and loading conditions. The predictive capability of the method was verified by comparing to the experimental data obtained by the rotating-bending, torsion and combined tension-torsion fatigue tests for ductile irons with ferritic, pearlitic and bulls-eye (ferritic/pearlitic) microstructures.

Influence of casting surfaces on fatigue strength of ductile cast iron

ABSTRACTQuantitatively evaluating the fatigue strength of ductile iron (DI) with casting surfaces involves several complicated factors such as surface roughness, transition of microstructures from surface to interior, several types of defects and residual stresses. Tension–compression fatigue tests have been performed using DI having casting surfaces composed of a ferritic structure, a ferrite‐pearlitic structure and a pearlitic structure. Residual stresses were relieved by annealing in order to separately evaluate each factor. The parameter model was applied for quantitative evaluation of fatigue strength. Surface roughness was considered to be mechanically equivalent to a defect, and the effective defect size due to the interaction between the surface roughness and a defect was defined. The present study proposes a method of evaluating the maximum defect size using statistics of extremes and the lower bound of the scatter of fatigue strength, for practical design.