Introduction: The assessment of symptoms status is pivotal to optimize the timing of aortic valve intervention in aortic stenosis (AS). However, little is known about the effect of sex on health status decline (i.e. functional status and quality of life) in AS patients. We evaluated the change in health status according to sex in patients with mild to moderate AS. Methods: Two hundred eighty-five patients with AS (peak aortic jet velocity [V peak ]≥2.0 m/s) prospectively recruited in the PROGRESSA study (NCT01679431) were included in this analysis. Health status was evaluated using the New York Heart Association (NYHA) classification and the Duke Activity Score Index (DASI). Results: At baseline, men were older (67±12 vs 61±17 yr; p=0.001), had more comorbidities including hypertension, coronary artery disease, and atrial fibrillation (all, p≤0.01), and more severe AS compared to women (2.8±0.5 vs 2.6±0.4 m/s; p=0.01). However, women had more symptoms (class I, II, III: 44%, 53%, 3% versus 63%, 36%, 1%; p=0.02) and significantly lower DASI (38±14 vs 43±13; p=0.006). During a mean follow-up of 3.9±2.4 years, despite faster AS progression rate in men (V peak increase: 0.16±0.2 vs 0.12±0.2 m/s/year; p=0.02), the worsening of symptoms (NYHA ≥I class; n=70) and decline in DASI score were comparable according to sex (Figure). However, for the same hemodynamic AS progression rate, women had significantly faster decline in DASI score (Figure). In linear mixed analysis adjusted for several clinical and echocardiographic risk factors, female sex remained significantly associated with the worsening of NYHA class (odds ratio: 3.9; 95% CI: 2.1 to 7.2; p<0.0001) and the decline in DASI score (coeff.: -9; 95% CI: -11 to -6; p<0.0001). Conclusion: Despite a better clinical profile and less severe AS, women generally had worse symptomatic status compared to men, and this difference was accentuated throughout follow-up. These findings raise the question of symptoms minimisation in women.
Read full abstract