Famous Voice Recognition Research Articles

Electrocorticography reveals the dynamics of famous voice responses in human fusiform gyrus.

Voice and face processing occur through convergent neural systems that facilitate speaker recognition. Neuroimaging studies suggest that familiar voice processing engages early visual cortex, including the bilateral fusiform gyrus (FG) on the basal temporal lobe. However, what role the FG plays in voice processing and whether it is driven by bottom-up or top-down mechanisms is unresolved. In this study we directly examined neural responses to famous voices and faces in human FG with direct cortical surface recordings (electrocorticography) in epilepsy surgery patients. We tested the hypothesis that neural populations in human FG respond to famous voices and investigated the temporal properties of voice responses in FG. Recordings were acquired from five adult participants during a person identification task using visual and auditory stimuli from famous speakers (U.S. Presidents Barack Obama, George W. Bush, and Bill Clinton). Patients were presented with images of presidents or clips of their voices and asked to identify the portrait/speaker. Our results demonstrate that a subset of face-responsive sites in and near FG also exhibit voice responses that are both lower in magnitude and delayed (300-600 ms) compared with visual responses. The dynamics of voice processing revealed by direct cortical recordings suggests a top-down feedback-mediated response to famous voices in FG that may facilitate speaker identification.NEW & NOTEWORTHY Interactions between auditory and visual cortices play an important role in person identification, but the dynamics of these interactions remain poorly understood. We performed direct brain recordings of fusiform face cortex in human epilepsy patients performing a famous voice naming task, revealing the dynamics of famous voice processing in human fusiform face cortex. The findings support a model of top-down interactions from auditory to visual cortex to facilitate famous voice recognition.

Are super‐face‐recognisers also super‐voice‐recognisers? Evidence from cross‐modal identification tasks

SummaryIndividual differences in face identification ability range from prosopagnosia to super‐recognition. The current study examined whether face identification ability predicts voice identification ability (participants: N = 529). Superior‐face‐identifiers (exceptional at face memory and matching), superior‐face‐recognisers (exceptional at face memory only), superior‐face‐matchers (exceptional face matchers only), and controls completed the Bangor Voice Matching Test, Glasgow Voice Memory Test, and a Famous Voice Recognition Test. Meeting predictions, those possessing exceptional face memory and matching skills outperformed typical‐range face groups at voice memory and voice matching respectively. Proportionally more super‐face‐identifiers also achieved our super‐voice‐recogniser criteria on two or more tests. Underlying cross‐modality (voices vs. faces) and cross‐task (memory vs. perception) mechanisms may therefore drive superior performances. Dissociations between Glasgow Voice Memory Test voice and bell recognition also suggest voice‐specific effects to match those found with faces. These findings have applied implications for policing, particularly in cases when only suspect voice clips are available.

Normal recognition of famous voices in developmental prosopagnosia

Developmental prosopagnosia (DP) is a condition characterised by lifelong face recognition difficulties. Recent neuroimaging findings suggest that DP may be associated with aberrant structure and function in multimodal regions of cortex implicated in the processing of both facial and vocal identity. These findings suggest that both facial and vocal recognition may be impaired in DP. To test this possibility, we compared the performance of 22 DPs and a group of typical controls, on closely matched tasks that assessed famous face and famous voice recognition ability. As expected, the DPs showed severe impairment on the face recognition task, relative to typical controls. In contrast, however, the DPs and controls identified a similar number of voices. Despite evidence of interactions between facial and vocal processing, these findings suggest some degree of dissociation between the two processing pathways, whereby one can be impaired while the other develops typically. A possible explanation for this dissociation in DP could be that the deficit originates in the early perceptual encoding of face structure, rather than at later, post-perceptual stages of face identity processing, which may be more likely to involve interactions with other modalities.

Obligatory and facultative brain regions for voice-identity recognition.

Recognizing the identity of others by their voice is an important skill for social interactions. To date, it remains controversial which parts of the brain are critical structures for this skill. Based on neuroimaging findings, standard models of person-identity recognition suggest that the right temporal lobe is the hub for voice-identity recognition. Neuropsychological case studies, however, reported selective deficits of voice-identity recognition in patients predominantly with right inferior parietal lobe lesions. Here, our aim was to work towards resolving the discrepancy between neuroimaging studies and neuropsychological case studies to find out which brain structures are critical for voice-identity recognition in humans. We performed a voxel-based lesion-behaviour mapping study in a cohort of patients (n = 58) with unilateral focal brain lesions. The study included a comprehensive behavioural test battery on voice-identity recognition of newly learned (voice-name, voice-face association learning) and familiar voices (famous voice recognition) as well as visual (face-identity recognition) and acoustic control tests (vocal-pitch and vocal-timbre discrimination). The study also comprised clinically established tests (neuropsychological assessment, audiometry) and high-resolution structural brain images. The three key findings were: (i) a strong association between voice-identity recognition performance and right posterior/mid temporal and right inferior parietal lobe lesions; (ii) a selective association between right posterior/mid temporal lobe lesions and voice-identity recognition performance when face-identity recognition performance was factored out; and (iii) an association of right inferior parietal lobe lesions with tasks requiring the association between voices and faces but not voices and names. The results imply that the right posterior/mid temporal lobe is an obligatory structure for voice-identity recognition, while the inferior parietal lobe is only a facultative component of voice-identity recognition in situations where additional face-identity processing is required.

Defective recognition and naming of famous people from voice in patients with unilateral temporal lobe tumours

Twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for a temporal glioma, either in the left (16 patients) or right (13 patients) hemisphere, were administered standardized tests of unknown voice discrimination (UVD) and of famous voice recognition (VO-REC), which included tasks of familiarity evaluation, semantic identification and naming of famous voices. The UVD consisted of twenty stimuli, in which two audio files were consecutively presented; the subject was requested to judge whether the voices belonged to the same or different persons. In the VO-REC, patients were requested to recognize the voices of 40 very well known people; these voices were intermingled with the voices of 20 unknown people for a familiarity check, followed by identification and naming of persons recognized as familiar. We aimed at verifying the effect of laterality and intra-temporal site of lesion on familiarity assessment, false alarms, identification and naming of familiar people. As for the effect of lesion side, our results showed that patients with right temporal gliomas were significantly more impaired in voices discrimination and produced more false alarms than patients with a left glioma, who, in turn, were significantly more impaired in name retrieval than patients with a right temporal glioma. The high number of false alarms in patients with a right temporal glioma suggests that familiarity judgment was impaired. Regarding the neuroanatomical correlates of these different patterns of impairment, MRI data suggested that: (a) UVD disorders are due to lesions involving the whole right anterior temporal lobe and extending to lateral portions of the temporal and frontal lobes; (b) familiarity judgments (testified by an increased number of false alarms) are impaired in lesions restricted to the right anterior temporal lobe; (c) name retrieval deficits are found only in patients with left temporal lesions. UVD disorders were interpreted, at least in part, as due to an impairment of executive functions, resulting from a disconnection of the right temporal lobe from the frontal lobe control. A partly unexpected finding was that some patients with a right temporal tumour had a normal performance in famous voice recognition and identification, in spite of having severe voice discrimination disturbances. These unexpected results, in agreement with previous observation made in the visual (face) modality, are inconsistent with strictly hierarchical models of voice processing.

Selective associative phonagnosia after right anterior temporal stroke

We report the case of a 48 year old men who developed a selective impairment in famous voice recognition after ischemic stroke in right subcortical structures (lenticular nucleus and head of the caudate) and right anterior temporal lobe. He underwent fibrinolytic treatment. During the following days he progressively recovered and was discharged without neurological focal sign. Patent foramen ovale was found. When he got back to his house he noticed that he was unable to recognize the voice of his favoured singers and needed to ask who was the singer to his relatives. Neuropsychological examination revealed a selective impairment in famous voice recognition in the absence of alteration of voice perception, face perception and famous face recognition. All other neuropsychological domains were spared. In particular language, memory and executive functions were intact. Neuroimaging carried out by means of PET and MRI revealed two small ischemic lesions in the right subcortical region, involving lenticular and caudate nuclei and in the right temporal pole. To our knowledge, this is the first case described in literature of a patient showing a selective associative phonagnosia after right anterior temporal stroke. The present case helps to clarify the brain circuits underlying famous voice recognition and adds evidence in favour of a right hemisphere involvement in processing knowledge of familiar voices. These findings are discussed in relation to current models of brain organization of person-specific and general semantic knowledge.

Voice Identity Recognition Failure in Patients With Schizophrenia

Cognitive models propose that auditory verbal hallucinations arise through inner speech misidentification. However, such models cannot explain why the voices in hallucinations often have identities different from the hearer. This study investigated whether a general voice identity recognition difficulty might be present in schizophrenia and related to auditory verbal hallucinations. Twenty-five schizophrenia patients and 13 healthy controls were tested on recognition of famous voices. Signal detection theory was used to calculate perceptual sensitivity and response criterion measures. Schizophrenia patients obtained fewer hits and had lower perceptual sensitivity to detect famous voices than healthy controls did. There were no differences between groups in false alarm rate or response criterion. A symptom-based analysis demonstrated that especially those patients with auditory verbal hallucinations performed poorly in the task. The results indicate that patients with hallucinations are impaired at voice identity recognition because of decreased sensitivity, which may result in inner speech misidentification.

Conclusion

Twenty-nine patients who underwent surgery for a temporal glioma, either in the left (16 patients) or right (13 patients) hemisphere, were administered standardized tests of unknown voice discrimination (UVD) and of famous voice recognition (VO-REC), which included tasks of familiarity evaluation, semantic identification and naming of famous voices. The UVD consisted of twenty stimuli, in which two audio files were consecutively presented; the subject was requested to judge whether the voices belonged to the same or different persons. In the VO-REC, patients were requested to recognize the voices of 40 very well known people; these voices were intermingled with the voices of 20 unknown people for a familiarity check, followed by identification and naming of persons recognized as familiar. We aimed at verifying the effect of laterality and intra-temporal site of lesion on familiarity assessment, false alarms, identification and naming of familiar people. As for the effect of lesion side, our results showed that patients with right temporal gliomas were significantly more impaired in voices discrimination and produced more false alarms than patients with a left glioma, who, in turn, were significantly more impaired in name retrieval than patients with a right temporal glioma. The high number of false alarms in patients with a right temporal glioma suggests that familiarity judgment was impaired. Regarding the neuroanatomical correlates of these different patterns of impairment, MRI data suggested that: (a) UVD disorders are due to lesions involving the whole right anterior temporal lobe and extending to lateral portions of the temporal and frontal lobes; (b) familiarity judgments (testified by an increased number of false alarms) are impaired in lesions restricted to the right anterior temporal lobe; (c) name retrieval deficits are found only in patients with left temporal lesions. UVD disorders were interpreted, at least in part, as due to an impairment of executive functions, resulting from a disconnection of the right temporal lobe from the frontal lobe control. A partly unexpected finding was that some patients with a right temporal tumour had a normal performance in famous voice recognition and identification, in spite of having severe voice discrimination disturbances. These unexpected results, in agreement with previous observation made in the visual (face) modality, are inconsistent with strictly hierarchical models of voice processing.

Developmental phonagnosia: A selective deficit of vocal identity recognition

Phonagnosia, the inability to recognize familiar voices, has been studied in brain-damaged patients but no cases due to developmental problems have been reported. Here we describe the case of KH, a 60-year-old active professional woman who reports that she has always experienced severe voice recognition difficulties. Her hearing abilities are normal, and an MRI scan showed no evidence of brain damage in regions associated with voice or auditory perception. To better understand her condition and to assess models of voice and high-level auditory processing, we tested KH on behavioural tasks measuring voice recognition, recognition of vocal emotions, face recognition, speech perception, and processing of environmental sounds and music. KH was impaired on tasks requiring the recognition of famous voices and the learning and recognition of new voices. In contrast, she performed well on nearly all other tasks. Her case is the first report of developmental phonagnosia, and the results suggest that the recognition of a speaker's vocal identity depends on separable mechanisms from those used to recognize other information from the voice or non-vocal auditory stimuli.

Human brain potential correlates of voice priming and voice recognition

This study investigated repetition priming in the recognition of famous voices, recording reaction times (RTs) and event-related brain potentials (ERPs). In Experiment 1, a facilitation was found in RTs to famous but not to unfamiliar voices when these had been primed by a different voice sample of the same speaker earlier in the experiment. However, ERPs to both famous and unfamiliar voices showed repetition priming in terms of an increased P2 component, which is thought to be generated in the auditory cortex. When the likelihood of conscious retrieval of primes was reduced in Experiment 2, facilitatory priming in RTs was again observed for famous voices, but inhibitory priming was now observed for unfamiliar voices. This is consistent with predictions of a bias model of priming. Moreover, substantial priming was observed even when voice primes were backward speech samples, which were recognised at chance levels. The results suggests that (a) voice priming is mediated to a large extent by frequency characteristics of a particular voice, rather than by articulatory and other ‘sequential’ features that are eliminated in backward speech; (b) priming affects the processing of voices in auditory cortical areas within 200 ms after voice onset; and (c) explicit recognition of a voice in the priming phase is not a necessary condition for priming to occur.

Auditory Long term Memory: Repetition Priming of Voice Recognition

Two experiments examined repetition priming in the recognition of famous voices. In Experiment 1, reaction times for fame decisions to famous voice samples were shorter than in an unprimed condition, when voices were primed by a different voice sample of the same person having been presented in an earlier phase of the experiment. No effect of voice repetition was observed for non-famous voices. In Experiment 2, it was investigated whether this priming effect is voice-specific or whether it is related to post-perceptual processes in person recognition. Recognizing a famous voice was again primed by having earlier heard a different voice sample of that person. Although an earlier exposure to that person's name did not cause any priming, there was some indication of priming following an earlier exposure to that person's face. Finally, earlier exposure to the identical voice sample (as compared to a different voice sample from the same person) caused a considerable bias towards responding “famous”—i.e. performance benefits for famous but costs for nonfamous voices. The findings suggest that (1) repetition priming invoice recognition primarily involves the activation of perceptual representations of voices, and (2) it is important to determine the conditions in which priming causes bias effects that need to be disentangled from performance benefits.

Recognition of famous voices given excerpted vowels, words, and 2-s texts

The ability of 40 subjects to recognize 25 famous male voices was investigated. Samples were tape-recorded and edited on a PDP-11/34 computer. Three different listening tasks were prepared. Subjects indicated whether they recognized voices given six choices: (1) from 2-s samples; (2) from excerpted words (mean duration 481 ms; and (3) from excerpted and concatenated strings of vowels (mean duration 494 ms). The same voices were used in all tasks. Subjects were divided into two groups. For one group, the tasks were presented in the order 2-s texts, words, vowels. For group two, the reverse order was presented. A two-way ANOVA revealed no effect of presentation order. Subjects correctly identified 61% of the voices they knew (ascertained by a questionnaire) given 2-s texts, 40% of the voices given excerpted words, and 34% given vowel strings. Subjects performed significantly better on the 2-s task than on the word or vowels tasks. There was no significant difference between their performance on the word and vowels conditions. These results show that voices can be recognized given limited amounts of voice information. [Work supported by NIH Grant No. 4-443944-31117.]