Version Of Falls Efficacy Scale-International Research Articles

Lower extremity physical function and quality of life in patients with stroke: a longitudinal cohort study.

Lower extremity physical function (LEPF) is a key component for mobility and is impacted in stroke-related disability. A reduction in LEPF can have a significant impact on an individual's Quality of Life (QoL). The aim of this study is to characterise the relationship between LEPF and QoL. The MOBITEC-Stroke Study is a longitudinal cohort-study including patients with their first occurrence of ischaemic stroke. Using a linear mixed-effects model, the relationship between LEPF (timed up-and-go performance (TUG); predictor) and QoL (Stroke Specific Quality of Life scale (SS-QoL); outcome) at 3 and 12 months post stroke was investigated and adjusted for sex, age, Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADL), fear of falling (Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version, FES-I), and stroke severity (National Institute of Stroke Severity scale, NIHSS), accounting for the repeated measurements. Data of 51 patients (65 % males, 35% females) were analysed. The mean age was 71.1 (SD 10.4) years, median NIHSS score was 2.0. SS-QoL was 201.5 (SD 20.5) at 3 months and 204.2 (SD 17.4) at 12 months; the mean change was 2.7 (95% CI -2.4 to 7.7), p= 0.293. A positive association was found between baseline TUG performance (estimate log score -13.923; 95% CI -27.495 to -0.351; p=0.048) and change in SS-QoL score in multivariate regression analysis. Higher LEPF (i.e better TUG performance) at baseline, was associated with an improvement in QoL from 3- to 12-months post stroke. These results highlight the critical role of physical function, particularly baseline LEPF, in influencing the QoL of stroke survivors.

86 Fear of Falling as Measured by the Falls Efficacy Scale International Indicates Gait and Balance Abnormalities in Community Dwelling Older People

Abstract Background Falls are common in community dwelling older people, and gait and balance abnormalities (GABAb) are a key modifiable risk factor, through strength and balance training. In addition, there is a strong relationship between fear of falling (FoF) and GABAb , though Falls Efficacy Scale-International version (FES-I) scores have never been examined in this context. Our aim was to determine whether FoF, as measured by the FES-I, is associated with GABAb, as determined by commonly used gait and balance tests. Methods Consecutive patients attending our community falls prevention service completed FES-I questionnaires, and had Gait Speed (GS), Five Times Sit to Stand (FTSTS) and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tests assessed as part of a multifactorial falls prevention assessment. Cut-offs for falls risk are provided in the table. Sensitivity and specificity values for a 16-item FES-I cut-off score of 23.5 (>23 signifying significant FoF) were evaluated using the area under a receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), along with positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+/LR-). Results There were 991 participants, 352 male, 639 female, mean age 74.5 years, mean FES-I score 28.7 and 57.0% had experienced at least one fall in the previous year. Gait and balance test scores were moderately associated with FoF per FES-I ≥23.5 as shown in the table. Specificities and sensitivities for all three are similar to commonly used diagnostic tests such as exercise testing versus coronary angiography for coronary artery disease. Conclusions FoF as measured by the FES-I is associated with scores on commonly used gait and balance tests that indicate a high risk of falling. This study highlights the potential of using FES-I as a screening tool to identify community dwelling older adults at risk of falling who may benefit from strength and balance training rather than relying on physical tests that are rarely performed outside falls clinics and physiotherapy departments. This application may have utility both in opportunistic individual screening and community screening programmes.

The association between fear of falling and functional tests in older adults with diabetes mellitus

Background: The number of older adults with diabetes mellitus (DM) is increasing. Falling during walking and the fear of it are prevalent in older adults with DM. Objective: This study aimed to examine the association between fear of falling (FoF) and functional tests in older adults with DM and to determine other factors affecting functional tests in these people. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted on 134 older adults with DM who had referred to the diabetes clinic of Matini Hospital in Kashan, Iran. The participants were selected through sequential sampling and then were categorized into two groups of “with” and “without FoF.” In addition to responding to a demographic questionnaire, the participants were assessed by the Mini-Mental State Examination, Diabetic Neuropathy Symptom Score, and Falls Efficacy Scale-International version. Walking performance of the participants was also measured using the Timed Up-and-Go, 5-Sit-to-Stand, and 50-Foot Timed Walk tests. Data were analyzed using the Chi-square, t-, and Mann–Whitney U-tests and linear regressions analysis. Results: Significant associations were found between FoF and education level, body mass index, waist-to-hip ratio, and having neuropathy (P

A cross-sectional study comparing lateral and diagonal maximum weight shift in people with stroke and healthy controls and the correlation with balance, gait and fear of falling

Impaired balance is common post stroke and can be assessed by means of force-platforms measuring center of pressure (COP) displacements during static standing, or more dynamically during lateral maximum weight shift (MWS). However, activities of daily life also include diagonal MWS and since force platforms are nowadays commercially available, investigating lateral and diagonal MWS in a clinical setting might be feasible and clinically relevant. We investigated lateral and diagonal MWS while standing in patients with stroke (PwS) and healthy controls (HC), evaluated MWS towards the affected and the non-affected side for PwS and correlated MWS with measures of balance, gait and fear of falling. In a cross-sectional observational study including 36 ambulatory sub-acute inpatients and 32 age-matched HC, a force platform (BioRescue, RM Ingénierie, France) was used to measure lateral and diagonal MWS in standing. Clinical outcome measures collected were Berg Balance Scale and Community Balance and Mobility Scale (CBMS) for balance, 10-meter walk test (10MWT) for gait speed and Falls Efficacy Scale–international version for fear of falling. MWS for PwS towards the affected side was significantly smaller compared to HC (lateral: p = 0.029; diagonal-forward: p = 0.000). MWS for PwS was also significantly reduced towards the affected side in the diagonal-forward direction (p = 0.019) compared to the non-affected side of PwS. Strong correlations were found for MWS for PwS in the diagonal-forward direction towards the affected side, and clinical measures of balance (CBMS: r = 0.66) and gait speed (10MWT: r = 0.66). Our study showed that ambulatory sub-acute PwS, in comparison to HC, have decreased ability to shift their body weight diagonally forward in standing towards their affected side. This reduced ability is strongly related to clinical measures of balance and gait speed. Our results suggest that MWS in a diagonal-forward direction should receive attention in rehabilitation of ambulatory sub-acute PwS in an inpatient setting.

Psychometric properties of the original and short versions of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) in people with Parkinson\u2019s disease

BackgroundFear of falling is common in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) and is associated with an increased risk for future falls, activity limitations and a reduced quality of life. The Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) assesses fear of falling conceptualized as concerns about falling. The original FES-I has good psychometric properties in people with PD, but whether this applies also for the short version of FES-I remains to be shown.The aim of the present study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of the short FES-I and to compare these with the original FES-I in the same sample of people with PD. The investigated psychometric properties included known groups validity, data completeness, scaling assumptions, targeting and reliability.MethodsA postal survey, which included the original, full-length FES-I, was distributed to 174 people with PD. Responders received a second survey after two weeks. From these data, short FES-I total scores were calculated by extracting the items that are included in the short version of the scale.ResultsMedian age and PD duration of the 101 responders (43% women) were 73 and 5 years, respectively. The original as well as the short FES-I scores were able to discriminate (p < 0.001) between groups with and without fear of falling, activity avoidance, falls, near falls, and with various self-rated PD severity, respectively. Both versions of FES-I had a high level of data completeness (0.7 to 0.9% missing item responses). Scaling assumptions were acceptable for the original as well as the short FES-I. While the short FES-I had 19% floor effect, the original version was better targeted. Both versions were reliable and obtained high values for internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha >0.8) and test-retest reliability (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient > 0.9).ConclusionsBoth the original and short FES-I revealed generally good psychometric properties in people with PD, although the original scale was better targeted. Due to the higher floor effect in the short FES-I, the present findings favors using the original, full-length FES-I in longitudinal follow-ups, intervention studies and clinical practice when addressing concerns about falling.

Home-Based Exercise Supported by General Practitioner Practices: Ineffective in a Sample of Chronically Ill, Mobility-Limited Older Adults (the HOMEfit Randomized Controlled Trial).

To evaluate the effects a home-based exercise program delivered to ill and mobility-limited elderly individuals on physical function, physical activity, quality of life, fall-related self-efficacy, and exercise self-efficacy. Randomized controlled trial (ISRCTN Registry, Reg.-No. ISRCTN17727272). Fifteen general practitioner (GP) practices and participants' homes. Chronically ill and mobility-limited individuals aged 70 and older (N = 209). An exercise therapist delivered the experimental intervention-a 12-week multidimensional home-based exercise program integrating behavioral strategies-in individual counseling sessions at the GPs' practices and over the telephone. The control intervention focused on promoting light-intensity activities of daily living. Interventions took place between February 2012 and March 2013. The primary outcome was functional lower body strength (chair-rise test). Secondary outcomes were physical function (battery of motor tests), physical activity (step count), health-related quality of life (Medical Outcomes Study 8-item Short-Form Survey), fall-related (Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version), and exercise self-efficacy (Selbstwirksamkeit zur sportlichen Aktivitaet (SSA) scale). Postintervention differences between the groups were tested using analysis of covariance (intention to treat; adjusted for baseline value and GP practice; significance level P ≤ .05). Participants had a mean age ± standard deviation of 80 ± 5, 74% were female, 87% had three or more chronic diseases, and 54% used a walking aid. The difference (intention to treat; experimental minus control) between adjusted postintervention chair-rise times was -0.1 (95% confidence interval = -1.8-1.7). Differences for all secondary outcomes were also nonsignificant. The program was ineffective in the target population. Possibilities for improving the concept will have to be evaluated.

Does the falls efficacy scale international version measure fear of falling: a reassessment of internal validity using a factor analytic approach.

the Falls Efficacy Scale-International (FES-I) is a widely used measure of fear of falling that assesses concerns with respect to falls over a range of physical and social activities. In the original validation study, the methods used (self-selection by participants) were likely to over-represent those with a higher educational level and socio-economic grouping. In addition, the factor analysis method used was potentially less applicable to older individuals and may have been less likely to measure the construct of fear of falling. to validate the internal validity of the FES-I and assess its suitability as a measure of fear of falling. cross-sectional survey. community sample. a random sample of 200 participants aged 60 years completed the FES-I by structured interview. We verify internal validity with a factor analytic approach not previously employed in this study design context, principal factor analysis on the matrix of polychoric correlations. we find no redundancy in the questions on the FES-I. All are found to strongly represent concerns about falling during social and physical activities. the FES-I is an appropriate tool to assess fear or concerns with respect to falls in the general elderly population, and more appropriately represents concern of falling than has previously been found. Future health services research with the FES-I should have its design informed by the results presented in this study, as the structure of the 'concern with falling' factor differs markedly from that found in previous validity testing.

Functional capacity and fear of falling in cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy

Cancer patients, particularly during chemotherapy, often encounter functional status limitations. This study examines fear of falling, balance, gait and lower limb strength in cancer patients during ongoing or recently completed (≤12 months) chemotherapeutic treatment in comparison to age-matched and senior controls (≥65 years). Data were obtained from 69 subjects; 21 cancer patients (51±7 years) with histological confirmed diagnosis and two control groups (2×n=24): one age-matched (53±7 years) and one senior group (70±3 years). Fear of falling (FoF) was evaluated using the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version. Motor function measurement included postural sway (centre of pressure) in upright stance with eyes covered, gait speed (comfortable fluid walking) and maximum voluntary isometric quadriceps strength (MIVF). One-way ANOVA followed by corrected post hoc paired-sample t-test revealed inferior values in cancer patients than in age-matched healthy regarding all parameters. Gait speed and MIVF of cancer patients were higher than in the senior control group (p<.05), whereas their FoF and postural sway were comparable (p>.05). Physical performance parameters of cancer patients were found to be lower in comparison to healthy age-matched subjects. Cancer patients show physical impairments which may limit independence and may increase fall risk. The present findings call for routine screening of physical function in cancer patients, and further stress the relevance of exercise interventions during and after chemotherapy.

The maximal width of the base of support (BSW): Clinical applicability and reliability of a preferred-standing test for measuring the risk of falling

The aim of this study was to test the reliability and validity of a preferred-standing test for measuring the risk of falling. The preferred-standing position of elderly fallers and non-fallers and healthy young adults was measured. The maximal BSW was measured. The absolute and relative reliability and discriminant validity were assessed. The expanded timed get-up-and-go test (ETGUG), one-leg stance test (OS), tandem stance (TS), and falls efficacy scale international version (FES-I) were used to determine criterion validity. In total, 146 persons (102 females, 44 males; mean age 55±22 years, range 20–94) were recruited. Forty elderly community dwellers (8 fallers) and 26 young adults were tested twice to determine the test–retest reliability. The BSW showed acceptable test–retest reliability (Intraclass correlation coefficient, ICC2,1=0.77–0.83) and inter-rater reliability (ICC3,1=0.77–0.95) for all groups. The standard error of measurement (SEM) was between 0.77 and 1.87, and the smallest detectable change (SDC) was between 2.14cm and 5.19cm. The Bland–Altman plot revealed no systematic errors. There was significant difference between elderly fallers and non-fallers (F(1/75)=11.951; p=0.001. Spearman's rho coefficient values showed no correlation between the BSW and the ETGUG (−0.17, p=0.47), OLS (−0.04, p=0.65), TS (−0.11, p=0.21), and FES-I (−0.10; p=0.27). Only the BSW was a significant predictor for falling (odds ratio=0.736, p=0.007). The reliability and validity of the BSW protocol were acceptable overall. Prospective studies are warranted to evaluate the predictive value of the BSW for determining the risk of falling.

Falls efficacy among stroke survivors living in the community

Purpose. The study focused on the falls efficacy of stroke survivors in the community and its association with the related factors.Method. The study was conducted through a cross-sectional design in the community setting. One hundred seven stroke survivors were recruited. Falls efficacy was measured by the 7-item Falls Efficacy Scale International version, where the higher mean score showed more concern about falling in daily life.Results. Activities of daily living (ADL) dependency levels, including mild, moderate and severe, contributed to 33.5%% of the explained variance. Women were over 7.5 times more likely to have high falls efficacy than men. Moderate and severe ADL dependency participants were 10.8 and 13.6 times more likely to have high falls efficacy than ADL independent participants. Single fall participants were also nearly 13 times more likely to have high falls efficacy than others who had either recurrent falls or no falls.Conclusions. Female gender, strong ADL dependency, and single falls were associated with high falls efficacy. The levels of ADL dependency were the most correlated with falls efficacy than with other related factors. Rehabilitation interventions should also be incorporated to minimise ADL dependency, and to improve falls efficacy for stroke survivors.

Perceived pain, fear of falling and physical function in women with osteoporosis

The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate pain intensity-related differences in physical performance and fear of falling in elderly women with osteoporosis. A sample of 82 osteoporotic women (73.8 ± 8.1 years) with and without vertebral fractures was included. Numeric rating scale (NRS) measures (0 = no pain, 10 = unbearable) were applied to obtain actual pain intensity and to stratify between patients with mild (0–3), moderate (4–6) and severe (7–10) pain. Activity-related fear of falling was evaluated with the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I). Physical performance measures included maximum voluntary quadriceps strength, postural sway and gait speed measures. Controlling for age, fractures, and history of falls ANCOVA with Scheffe's post hoc test indicated significant slower walking velocities and greater postural sway for patients with severe pain. Furthermore, significant group differences could be detected for muscle strength and fear of falling. Patients with more intense pain (NRS ≥ 5) were 6.4 times (odds ratio; 95%CI: 1.5–26.7) more likely to score below average in fall-related self-efficacy and all physical performance tests. Among women with osteoporosis, heightened back pain intensity increases fear of falling and decreases physical performance irrespective of vertebral fractures and history of falls.

Validation of the Falls Efficacy Scale and Falls Efficacy Scale International in Geriatric Patients with and without Cognitive Impairment: Results of Self-Report and Interview-Based Questionnaires

Background: Frail, old patients with and without cognitive impairment are at high risk of falls and associated medical and psychosocial issues. The lack of adequate, validated instruments has partly hindered research in this field. So far no questionnaire documenting fall-related self-efficacy/fear of falling has been validated for older persons with cognitive impairment or for different administration methods such as self-report or interview. Objective: To validate the self-report and interview version of the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES) and the Falls Efficacy Scale International Version (FES-I) in frail geriatric patients with and without cognitive impairment. Methods: 156 geriatric patients in geriatric rehabilitations wards with (n = 75) and without cognitive impairment (n = 81) were included in this study. Reports of fall-related self-efficacy were based on self-reported and interview-based questionnaires. Descriptive statistics, reliability estimates and validation results were computed for the total group and sub-samples with respect to cognitive status, for the 2 different questionnaires (FES/FES-I) and for the 2 administration methods. Test-retest reliability was tested in a subsample of 62 patients. Results: Internal reliability and test-retest reliability were good to excellent in both the FES and FES-I, with the FES-I showing better internal reliability and the FES better test-retest reliability with respect to cognitively impaired persons. The group of cognitively impaired persons tended to show lower test-retest reliability and mean fall-related self-efficacy and had significantly lower completion rates in self-administered questionnaires. As indicated by significant differences in parameters closely related to falls, such as vertigo, functional performances, fear of falling and history of falls, both the FES and the FES-I showed good construct validity. Effect sizes computed for the above-mentioned groups for fall-related parameters confirmed the results of construct validation. Conclusion: Both the FES as well as the FES-I showed good to excellent measurement properties in persons with and without moderate cognitive impairment. In frail older persons, especially in persons with cognitive impairment, an interview-based administration method is recommended.

Die Deutsche Version der Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I)

The German version of the Falls Efficacy Scale-International Version (FES-I), which is presented, was developed for the documentation of fall-related selfefficacy in older persons by a EU-funded expert network (Prevention of Falls Network Europe ProFaNE). The FES-I represents a modification of the original Falls Efficacy Scale (FES), including additional items on complex functional performances and social aspects of falls. The FES-I shows high internal reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.96) as well as high test-retest reliability (r=0.96). The mean inter-item correlation was: r = 0.55 (Range r = 0.29-0.79). Results of validation studies for the FES-I in community dwelling older persons for different European countries and geriatric patients with cognitive impairment will be published in the near future.