Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Failure Research Articles

The Relationship Between Exogenous Testosterone Use and Risk for Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Rupture

Background: In the United States, testosterone therapy has markedly increased in recent years. Currently, there is a paucity of evidence evaluating the risk of ligamentous injuries in patients taking testosterone replacement therapy (TRT). Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to quantify the association between TRT and the incidence of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries and the subsequent risk of ACL reconstruction (ACLR) failure. It was hypothesized that individuals receiving TRT would demonstrate an increased risk for index ACL injury and ACL rerupture. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study utilizing the PearlDiver database. Records were queried between 2011 and 2020 for patients aged 18 to 59 years who filled a testosterone prescription. A matched control group based on age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, tobacco use, diabetes, and hypothyroidism consisted of patients aged 18 to 59 years who had never filled a prescription for exogenous testosterone. International Classification of Diseases, 9th and 10th Revisions and Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes were utilized to identify patients with ACL injuries and those undergoing reconstruction. Multivariable logistic regression was used to compare rates of ACL injury at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years after initiating TRT. ACLR failure was also examined at 1-year intervals for 5 years for individuals filling a TRT prescription. Results: A total of 851,816 patients were enrolled, with 425,908 patients in the TRT and control groups, respectively. The TRT cohort was significantly more likely to experience an ACL tear during 6-month (OR, 2.66; 95% CI, 2.17-3.26), 1-year (OR, 2.46; 95% CI, 2.11-2.86), and 2-year (OR, 2.22; 95% CI, 1.98-2.48) periods. The rate of reconstruction failure did not differ between the 2 cohorts at up to 5 years of follow-up ( P > .05). Conclusion: Patients receiving TRT were significantly more likely to sustain a primary ACL rupture but were not at a statistically significant increased risk of reconstruction failure.

Functional outcome after arthroscopic mosaicplasty for localised osteochondral defects in the knee

Background: Knee injuries are commonly encountered in active sports persons as well as nonathletes, with approximately 60% of patients having cartilage damage with or without associated ligament and meniscal injuries. In this study, we report on the functional outcome of autologous osteochondral grafting in localised cartilage lesions of the knee. MethodsA longitudinal follow-up study was conducted on 50 patients aged between 18-55 years with symptomatic focal cartilage defect in the knee of size less than 2.0 cm2 after necessary inclusion/exclusion criteria. Management involved arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting. The donor cartilage was from the non–weight-bearing region of the ipsilateral knee. Other associated intra-articular injuries were addressed in the same sitting. The patients were followed up after 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months and clinical status documented by the Lysholm Knee Function Scale (LKFS). ResultsMost patients were young active males. Clinical presentation involved pain in all participants, followed by joint line tenderness. There was at least one associated injury to other intra-articular structures in 52% of the patients. The commonest associated injury was anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) tear followed by meniscus tear. The mean size of the focal cartilage defect was 1.013 cm2, ranging from 0.8 cm2 to 1.6 cm2. The mean preoperative LKFS was 56.97 ± 1.38 (standard error). There was a statistically (p < 0.001) as well as clinically significant (clinically important difference >13.0 and patient acceptable symptomatic state >70.0) improvement in the mean Lysholm score, which was 70 ± 1.32, 81.3 ± 1.12 and 92.1 ± 1.11 at the end of 6 weeks, 3 months and 6 months respectively. Eighty-four percent of the patients showed excellent functional outcome at 6 months (LKFS >90), whereas 8% and 4% had good and fair outcomes, respectively, at 6 months (LKFS: 70–90). Two patients (4%) who had failed ACL reconstruction had poor outcome (LKFS <70)at 6 months. ConclusionMosaicplasty is an excellent procedure for managing cartilage defects of small to medium sizes, less than 2.0 cm2. The short-term results are satisfying and can accelerate rehabilitation of sports injuries. It is noteworthy that instability is a contra-indication for the procedure to succeed.

MCL augmentation using a peroneus longus split tendon autograft satisfactorily restores knee stability with no impairment in foot function and with a low failure rate for concurrent ACL reconstruction.

Addressing grade 2 and 3 medial-sided instabilities during anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is crucial to reduce the risk of ACL graft failure. This study introduced a minimally invasive, medial collateral ligament (MCL) augmentation technique using a peroneus longus split tendon autograft, which was fixed to the femoral deep MCL insertion and tibial superficial MCL insertion. This prospective, longitudinal, single-centre case series included patients who underwent MCL augmentation concurrent with primary or revision ACL reconstruction due to anteromedial instability. Preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up, clinical examinations, such as rolimeter test of anterior tibial translation and medial instability, knee (International Knee Documentation Committee subjective knee form [IKDC], Lsyholm, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score [KOOS]) and foot function scores (American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society score [AOFAS]) and complications, were analyzed. Thirty-one patients with a mean follow-up of 13.5 ± 2.6 months and a mean age of 27.8 ± 9.6 years were included. The side-to-side difference for anterior tibial translation significantly improved from preoperative to 1-year follow-up with an ACL reconstruction failure rate of 6.5%. No patient retained a grade 2 or 3 medial instability on valgus stress testing with 30° flexion. Significant improvements from preoperative to 1-year postoperative follow-up were observed in knee function scores: IKDC (48.9 ± 26.9- 71.3 ± 11.5, p < 0.001) and Lysholm (59.9 ± 28.5-80.5 ± 11.2, p = 0.002) as well as KOOS pain, ADL, sport and QoL, each reaching the respective minimal clinically important difference values. The foot function score AOFAS showed no significant impairment (100 ± 0-99.3 ± 2.5, p = 0.250). Complications included cyclops lesions of ACL reconstruction in three patients. At 1-year follow-up, MCL augmentation using a peroneus longus split tendon autograft for patients simultaneously undergoing ACL reconstruction satisfactorily restores knee stability, has a low ACL reconstruction failure rate and does not significantly impair foot function. Level IV therapeutic study; case series.

The role of anterolateral complex surgery and slope-reducing osteotomies in revision ACL reconstructions: a narrative review.

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failures occur for various reasons including residual laxity, untreated concomitant injuries, poor graft quality, and high tibial slope. Various additional procedures can help to decrease revision ACLR failures including anterolateral complex (ALC) procedures and slope-reducing osteotomies for patients with high tibial slopes. This narrative review aims to review the literature on the roles of ALC augmentation procedures and slope-reducing osteotomies in the setting of patients undergoing revision ACLRs. A narrative review of relevant literature was performed in July 2024. Studies about anterolateral complex reconstructions and slope-reducing osteotomies in revision ACLRs were included. The literature reported that lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) and anterolateral ligament reconstructions (ALLR) can be used in revision ACLR cases to significantly reduce clinical knee laxity and the risk of repeated graft failure. There is not currently a strong opinion on which ALC procedure is superior. There are reported slight differences in lateral knee pain and knee stiffness, but both similarly significantly improve clinical and functional outcomes. In revision ACLR cases that also have a high posterior tibial slope (PTS), a slope-reducing tibial osteotomy is warranted. An anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (ACW-PTO) significantly reduces anterior tibial translation and graft failure. There is concern about the changes to patellar height, but the literature has found that such changes are either slight or absent by 6 months postoperatively. The risk of ACLR failure is increased by risk factors like high tibial slope, preoperative knee laxity, and prior ACLR rupture. Anterolateral complex procedures and slope-reducing osteotomies may be used to address these specific concerns and reduce the risk of graft rupture. For revision ACLR cases with lower PTS, augmentation with a LET or an ALLR to reduce the risk of graft failure and improve rotational stability may be warranted. In the setting of a revision ACLR in patients with a high PTS of ≥12°, a concomitant ACW-PTO and ALC procedure should be considered to decrease the risk of an ACLR graft failure.

Posterior Tibial Slope Measured on Plain Radiograph Versus MRI and Its Association With Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Matched Case-Control Study.

Posterior tibial slope (PTS) has been identified as a possible modifiable risk factor for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction (ACLR) failure. However, the findings in the literature are inconsistent. This may be explained by several different reasons, including different measurement methods, differing definitions of ACLR failure, and possible inclusion of suboptimal films. To compare PTS values obtained using plain radiographs (XR-PTS) in a young (≤21 years of age), skeletally mature patient population with those obtained using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), as well as to quantify the number of suboptimal lateral knee radiographs obtained across an integrated health care system and determine the potential effect of including these radiographs on summary statistics of XR-PTS. Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Skeletally mature adolescent and young adult patients ≤21 years of age were identified from the ACLR registry of Kaiser Permanente. The cases of concern were patients requiring revision ACLR. The controls were patients who had an ACLR and did not require a revision procedure. The XR-PTS measurements were made on plain radiographs by a single blinded reviewer. These results were compared with measurements obtained using MRI. The quality of each plain radiograph was evaluated by measuring posterior/distal femoral condylar overlap and length of tibial diaphysis captured on the radiograph. Summary statistics with and without inclusion of measurements made on suboptimal radiographs were calculated. Of the initial 634 patients with ACLR (317 case-control pairs), 561 (88.5%) had radiographs available and were included for the analysis comparing radiograph to MRI slope measurements. For the evaluation of slope between case and control pairs with radiograph information available, there were 257 case-control pairs; there were 124 pairs when those with suboptimal radiographs were excluded. There was no difference in MRI-measured lateral tibial posterior slope or medial tibial posterior slope for the 257 case-control pairs with XR-PTS information and for the 124 pairs with optimal radiographs. XR-PTS in the revision cohort was significantly steeper than in the control group when suboptimal radiographs were included in the analysis. There was no difference when patients with suboptimal radiographs were excluded. PTS measurements made on plain radiographs were larger than those made on MRI. There was a poor correlation between measurements made using these 2 modalities (r = 0.22 for radiograph and medial PTS). This study did not find a significantly steeper XR-PTS in patients who had to undergo revision ACLR when suboptimal radiographs were not included in the analysis. The present study's results confirmed the findings from a previous study of the same patient population that used MRI. However, there was poor correlation between PTS measurements made using plain radiograph and MRI.

Risk for Revision ACLR After Primary All-Inside Quadrupled Semitendinosus Hamstring Tendon Autograft ACLR With Independent Suture Tape Augmentation: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

The rate of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) remains high in the younger and more active patient populations. Suture tape augmentation (STA) in addition to ACLR may reduce the risk for revision surgery. The purpose of this study was to compare patient outcomes between patients who underwent primary all-inside quadrupled semitendinosus hamstring tendon autograft (QST-HTA) ACLR with and without STA. It was hypothesized that the STA cohort would demonstrate a lower incidence of subsequent revision ACLR while maintaining comparable patient-reported outcomes. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. All patients ≤40 years of age who received primary all-inside QST-HTA ACLR with and without independent STA augmentation were identified. The following validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected: visual analog scale for pain, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score subscales, and Tegner activity scale. KT-1000 arthrometer measurements were collected pre- and postoperatively. Cox proportional hazards model and nominal logistic regression analysis were used to assess additional variables associated with revision ACLR. A total of 104 patients with a mean age of <22 years were included in the final data analysis (STA: 36 patients; control: 68 patients). Significantly fewer patients in the STA group sustained a graft failure necessitating revision surgery at the final follow-up (5.6% vs 24%; relative risk, 0.24 [95% CI, 0.06-0.97]; P = .017). Four-year graft survival was significantly higher in the STA group (97.2% vs 82.4%; P = .031). All PROMs significantly improved postoperatively except for Tegner levels, which decreased in both groups compared with their preinjury levels (P < .001). Return to sports was similar in both groups with >70% of patients returning to their previous level of competition. Regression analysis demonstrated increased risk for revision ACLR in younger patients, high school athletes, and those with higher postoperative activity levels. QST-HTA ACLR with STA was associated with reduced risk for revision ACLR compared with nonaugmented QST-HTA ACLR in this young patient population. Furthermore, the addition of suture tape did not appear to affect postoperative patient-reported and return-to-sports outcomes.

Increased anterior tibial subluxation and differences between anterior tibial subluxation in the lateral and medial compartments are associated with failure of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether increased anterior tibial subluxation (ATS) and differences between ATS in the lateral and medial compartments (ATSL-M) are associated with primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) failure. PubMed, Scopus, Embase and Web of Science were systematically searched from their inception through 21 November 2023. The focus was on comparative studies reporting ATS in patients who experienced primary ACLR failure, in contrast to patients after primary ACLR with no evidence of graft failure. A random-effects model was employed to calculate the overall standardized mean difference between the two groups. A total of eight studies involving 963 patients were included in the final review. Three studies (64 cases and 171 controls) measured ATS on radiographs. The failed ACLR group exhibited a significantly increased ATS on radiographs compared to the control group (p < 0.001). Six studies (324 cases and 488 controls) measured lateral ATS on magnetic resonance imaging and five of them (285 cases and 374 controls) also measured medial ATS. The average values of lateral and medial ATS, as well as ATSL-M, were calculated and compared between the two groups. The failed ACLR group demonstrated significantly increased lateral (p < 0.001) and medial ATS (p < 0.001), the average value of lateral and medial ATS (p < 0.001) and ATSL-M (p = 0.039) compared to the control group. Increased ATS and ATSL-M are associated with primary ACLR failure. The measurement of tibiofemoral position shows promise for its application in preoperative planning and postoperative management of ACLR. Level III.

Slope Osteotomies in the Setting of Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency.

➤ Posterior tibial slope (PTS) of ≥12° represents an important risk factor for both anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury and ACL reconstruction failure.➤ PTS measurements can significantly differ on the basis of the imaging modality and the measurement technique used. PTS should be measured on strictly lateral radiographs, with a recommended proximal tibial length of 15 cm in the image. The PTS measurement can be made by placing 2 circles to define the proximal tibial axis, 1 just below the tibial tubercle and another 10 cm below it. PTS measurements are underestimated when made on magnetic resonance imaging and computed tomography.➤ Slope-reducing osteotomies can be performed using a (1) supratuberosity, (2) tubercle-reflecting transtuberosity, or (3) infratuberosity method. The correction target remains a topic of debate. Although it is controversial, some authors recommend overcorrecting the tibial slope slightly to a range of 4° to 6°. For instance, if the initial slope is 12°, a correction of 6° to 8° should be performed, given the target tibial slope of 4° to 6°.➤ Clinical outcomes following slope-reducing osteotomies have been favorable. However, potential complications, limited data with regard to the impact of slope-reducing osteotomies on osteoarthritis, and uncertainty with regard to the effects on the patellofemoral joint are notable concerns.➤ Patients with complex deformities may need biplanar osteotomies to comprehensively address the condition.

An Update on Emerging Techniques and Considerations in Revision Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

» The rate of primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) failure in at-risk populations remains unacceptably high and necessitates thorough evaluation of native alignment and concomitant injuries.» Posterior tibial slope of >12° is a substantial risk factor of ACLR failure and should be corrected through anterior closing wedge osteotomy.» Varus malalignment of >5° exacerbates stress on the ACL graft, increases ACLR failure risks, and should be considered for correction through high tibial osteotomy at the time of revision ACLR.» Injuries to the anterolateral ligamentous complex are prevalent in ACL ruptures, and high-risk patients have shown benefit from anterolateral ligament reconstruction or lateral extra-articular tenodesis in the revision setting.» Addressing posterolateral corner, collateral ligament, and meniscal injuries, during revision ACLR, is vital to mitigate increased graft forces and optimize knee stability and functional outcomes.

Poster 345: External Validation of the Norwegian Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Revision Prediction Model Using Patients From the Stability 1 Trial

Objectives: Machine learning has emerged as a potential tool for improving outcome prediction accuracy in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). A machine learning-based ACL revision prediction model has been developed using data from the Norwegian Knee Ligament Register (NKLR) but lacks external validation outside of Scandinavia. This study aimed to assess the external validity of the previously published ACL revision prediction model ( https://swastvedt.shinyapps.io/calculator_rev/ ) using data from the Stability 1 randomized clinical trial. The hypothesis was that the model's performance would be similar, indicating validity of the algorithm. Methods: This was a level 3 cohort study. The Cox Lasso prediction model from the original study was selected for external validation owing to its superior performance during model development and internal validation testing. The Stability 1 trial was an external randomized controlled trial that assigned patients to receive either hamstring tendon (HT) autograft or HT with lateral extra-articualr tenodesis (LET). Patients from Stability 1 with all 5 predictors required by the Cox Lasso model were included. Since all patients in the Stability 1 trial received hamstring HT plus/minus LET, three configurations were tested: 1: all patients coded as HT, 2: HT + LET group coded as bone-patellar tendon-bone (BPTB) autograft, 3: HT + LET group coded as unknown/other graft choice. The different configurations were tested because previous evaluation of the Stability 1 cohort by the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) suggests failure rates of HT + LET are most similar to the failure rates of patients who receive BPTB. Concordance and calibration were calculated to determine model performance with censoring of the time-to-event outcome. Results: In total, 591 patients from the Stability 1 trial were included, and 39 patients (6.6%) underwent revision surgery within 2 years. Model performance was best when patients randomized to HT + LET were coded as BPTB. Validation concordance was similar to the original NKLR prediction model for 1- and 2-year revision prediction (Stability: 0.71; NKLR: 0.68-0.69). Concordance CI ranged from 0.63-0.79. The model was well calibrated for 1-year prediction while the 2-year prediction demonstrated evidence of miscalibration. Conclusions: The most important finding of this study was that when patients in the Stability 1 trial who received HT + LET were coded as BPTB in the Norwegian prediction calculator, the model concordance was similar to the index study. However, the CI for the validation set was wider than the original model, suggesting that more data is required to definitively determine the external validity. The finding that HT + LET behaved most similarly to BPTB supports the notion that the addition of LET can decrease the failure and subsequent revision rate of primary ACLR when HT is used. In addition, if further external validation efforts are consistent with this study, the prediction model may require updating to equate HT + LET to BPTB for the purposes of prospectively estimating revision surgery risk.

Four-year comparative analysis of return to sport and psychological recovery following ACL revision: Artificial ligament vs. anterior tibial tendon allograft

BackgroundResearch on return to sport and psychological recovery in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) revision remains scarce. The clinical efficacy of artificial ligament in ACL revision requires further exploration. Our objectives were (1) to compare the midterm clinical outcomes of artificial ligament versus allogenic tendon graft in ACL revision and (2) to analyze the effects of employing artificial ligament on return to sport and psychological recovery in ACL revision. MethodsThis cohort study included the cases receiving ACL revision from 2014 to 2021 in Sports Medicine Department of Huashan Hospital. The grafts used were Ligament Advanced Reinforcement System (LARS) and ATT allograft. We recorded patients' baseline data. The final follow-up assessment included subjective scales, physical examination, and return to sport status. We recorded the rates and timings of return to sport. Subjective scales included the 2000 International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective score, Lysholm Knee Scaling Score (LKSS), Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Tegner activity score, Marx activity rating score, and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI). Anterior knee stability was assessed using the KT-1000 arthrometer. ResultsFifty cases (LARS group: 27; ATT group: 23) enrolled and 45 (LARS group: 23; ATT group: 22) completed evaluations with a median follow-up period of 49 months. At recent follow-up, LARS group outperformed in knee stability (1.0 ± 1.9 mm vs. 2.6 ± 3.0 mm, P = 0.039), confidence (86.7 ± 12.4 vs. 69.4 ± 18.6, P < 0.001), emotion (82.7 ± 11.3 vs. 70.7 ± 16.2, P < 0.001), KOOS knee function (78.7 ± 8.8 vs. 69.5 ± 11.0, P = 0.003), quality of life (79.1 ± 16.1 vs. 66.4 ± 19.5, P = 0.014), Tegner score (6.3 ± 1.9 vs. 5.2 ± 2.1, P < 0.001), and Marx activity score (10.7 ± 3.7 vs. 7.9 ± 4.0, P = 0.012). The LARS group had significantly higher return rates: recreational (91.3 % vs. 63.6 %, P = 0.026), knee cutting and pivoting (87.0 % vs. 59.1 %, P = 0.035), competitive (78.3 % vs. 45.5 %, P = 0.023), and pre-injury (56.5 % vs. 27.3 %, P = 0.047). For return timings, the LARS group was earlier at recreational (11.2 ± 3.9 vs. 27.8 ± 9.0 weeks, P < 0.001), knee cutting and pivoting (17.2 ± 5.8 vs. 35.6 ± 13.8 weeks, P < 0.001), competitive (24.8 ± 16.2 vs. 53.2 ± 22.0 weeks, P < 0.001), and pre-injury levels (32.8 ± 11.0 vs. 72.8 ± 16.9 weeks, P < 0.001). ConclusionIn ACL revision, using LARS demonstrated improved joint stability and functionality compared to using allogenic ATT four years postoperative. Patients accepting the LARS procedure exhibited higher rates and earlier timings of return to various levels of sport, indicating enhanced confidence and emotional resilience. The translational potential of this articleIn ACL revision, the choice of artificial ligament to shorten recovery time, thereby enabling patients to return to sport more quickly and effectively, is thought-provoking. The research value extends beyond mere graft selection, guiding future clinical trials and studies. This research enhances our understanding of the application value of artificial ligament in ACL revision, emphasizing the importance of psychological recovery and updating our perceptions of return to sport levels post-revision. It stimulates exploration into personalized rehabilitation programs and treatment strategies, aiming to optimize clinical outcomes and meet the real-world needs of patients with failed ACL reconstruction.

Supratubercle Anterior Closing Wedge Osteotomy: No Changes in Patellar Height and Significant Decreases in Anterior Tibial Translation at 6 Months Postoperatively

Background: Because of the increased prevalence of revision anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, there has been a desire to understand the role of posterior tibial slope on increased anterior tibial translation and increased ACL graft forces. One potential concern in supratubercle anterior closing wedge proximal tibial osteotomy (ACW-PTO) for decreasing the posterior tibial slope is the risk of altering the patellar height. Purpose: To radiographically assess changes in (1) patellar height, (2) anterior tibial translation, and (3) posterior tibial slope after supratubercle ACW-PTO. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: Patients who underwent supratubercle ACW-PTO by a single surgeon between July 2019 and June 2023 were included. Standardized lateral knee weightbearing radiographs to assess patellar height (via the Caton-Deschamps index), anterior tibial translation of the lateral tibial plateau relative to the lateral femoral condyle, and posterior tibial slope were obtained at 4 time points (preoperatively and 1 day, 3 months, and 6 months postoperatively). Paired t test was used to compare differences between preoperative, 1-day, and 3- and 6-month values for patellar height as measured using the Caton-Deschamps index and for posterior tibial slope. Paired t test was also used to compare differences in the preoperative and 6-month postoperative values for anterior tibial translation. Results: In 20 patients after ACW-PTO, the Caton-Deschamps index demonstrated a significant increase in patellar height on postoperative day 1 (P < .001) but no significant differences at 3 (P = .057) and 6 (P = .176) months postoperatively. Anterior tibial translation on standing lateral knee radiographs was significantly decreased by a mean of 8.9 mm from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Posterior tibial slope was significantly decreased by a mean of 11.2° from preoperatively to 6 months postoperatively (P < .001). Conclusion: Supratubercle ACW-PTO performed for ACL reconstruction failure in the setting of an increased posterior tibial slope did not induce significant changes in patellar height postoperatively. Furthermore, after ACW-PTO, there was a significant decrease in anterior tibial translation and posterior tibial slope.

Clinical outcome of combined over-the-top reconstruction with modified Lemaire procedure in one-stage revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Objective: To investigate the clinical effect of over-the-top (OTT) reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) combined with the modified Lemaire technique in one-stage ACL revision. Methods: It's a retrospective study. The clinical data of 37 patients who underwent one-stage revision of ACL using OTT combined with modified Lemaire technique from April 2020 to May 2023 in the Department of Sports Medicine of Xinhua Hospital Affiliated to Dalian University were retrospectively analyzed. There were 28 males and 9 females with a mean age of (32.7±5.7) years. The postoperative knee function and surgical revision effect were evaluated by subjective and objective evaluation indexes of the knee joint before and 3 months and 24 months after surgery. The subjective evaluation indexes included the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score, Lysholm score, and Tegner score; and the objective evaluation indexes included the anterior-posterior static displacement distance of the tibia, tibia-femur relative rotation angle, the Lachman test, the axial shift test, and the ratio of the loss of muscle strength of the lower limb. Results: At the final follow-up, all patients returned to pre-injury motor level, with significant improvements in IKDC scores (45.3±6.8 preoperatively, 67.5±4.7 and 93.2±2.3 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively), Lysholm scores (57.2±2.6 preoperatively, 72.6±2.9 and 89.7±3.7 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively), and Tegner scores (3.1±0.7 preoperatively, 4.9±0.6 and 5.8±1.3 at 3 months and 2 years after the operation, respectively) (all P<0.001). The anterior-posterior static displacement distance of the tibia reduced significantly [from (5.2±0.5) mm before the operation to (1.4±0.5) mm at 2 years postoperatively) (P<0.001)]; and the relative rotation angle of the tibia-femur restored to the normal physiological range, it was reduced from 6.2°±1.2° before the operation to 1.7°±0.3° 2 years after (P<0.001). The Lachman test and axial shift test at 2 years postoperatively were all negative. The muscle strength loss ratio of the affected lower limb was significantly better than that before the operation (P<0.001). Conclusion: The use of OTT reconstruction combined with modified Lemaire technique for revision of ACL in patients with ACL reconstruction failure can circumvent the tunnel problem for one-stage revision and better restore the stability and function of the knee joint, with ideal clinical results.

Stage I Revision ACL Reconstruction With Allograft Bone Dowels

Background: When evaluating a patient with a failed anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction, a detailed history and physical examination is paramount. The position and size of original femoral and tibial tunnels are critical in the surgical decision-making in the setting of revision ACL reconstruction. This video presents a case of stage I revision ACL reconstruction with the use of allograft bone dowels due to increased size and poor position of original fixation tunnels. Indications: Indications for staging revision ACL reconstruction include significant tunnel osteolysis or dilation (&gt;14 mm), or any situation in which the previous bone tunnels will interfere with anatomic graft placement and fixation. Technique Description: The patient is placed in the supine position with a standard setup for knee arthroscopy, including lateral thigh post and foot stop for maintained knee flexion at 90°. After diagnostic arthroscopy, the ACL graft remnant is debrided. The femoral tunnel is then debrided and re-cannulated, followed by reaming with cannulated reamers until adequate cortical chatter is achieved, ensuring the presence of a bleeding rim of bone throughout the tunnel to confirm that the correct diameter reamer has been reached. The appropriately sized bone dowel is inserted along the guide pin until fully seated and flush with lateral wall of the notch. This process is then repeated for the tibial tunnel, accessing the tunnel from the previous incision along the medial tibia. Results: This video presents a technique to achieve adequate bone grafting of previously used tunnels that are not suitable for single-stage revision ACL reconstruction. Patients undergo second-stage revision ACL reconstruction at roughly 4 to 6 months following stage I, when bone graft has fully incorporated on radiographs. Discussion/Conclusion: Stage I revision ACL reconstruction with tunnel grafting using allograft bone dowels is a minimally invasive method of grafting previously used fixation tunnels to allow for anatomic second-stage graft placement and fixation. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Evaluation of Failed ACL Reconstruction: An Updated Review.

Failure rates among primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (ACLR) range from 3.2% to 11.1%. Recently, there has been increased focus on surgical and anatomic considerations which predispose patients to failure, including excessive posterior tibial slope (PTS), unaddressed high-grade pivot shift, and improper tunnel placement. The purpose of this review was to provide a current summary and analysis of the literature regarding patient-related and technical factors surrounding revision ACLR, rehabilitation considerations, overall outcomes and return to sport (RTS) for patients who undergo revision ACLR. There is a convincingly higher re-tear and revision rate in patients who undergo ACLR with allograft than autograft, especially amongst the young, athletic population. Unrecognized Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PLC) injury is a common cause of ACLR failure and current literature suggests concurrent operative management of high-grade PLC injuries. Given the high rates of revision surgery in young active patients who return to pivoting sports, the authors recommend strong consideration of a combined ACLR + Anterolateral Ligament (ALL) or Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure in this population. Excessive PTS has been identified as an independent risk factor for ACL graft failure. Careful consideration of patient-specific factors such as age and activity level may influence the success of ACL reconstruction. Additional technical considerations including graft choice and fixation method, tunnel position, evaluation of concomitant posterolateral corner and high-grade pivot shift injuries, and the role of excessive posterior tibial slope may play a significant role in preventing failure.

The relationship between lateral femoral condyle ratio measured by MRI and anterior cruciate ligament injury.

Previous studies have shown that the lateral femoral condyle ratio (LFCR) measured by X-ray has a significant relationship with the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury. However, few relevant studies have been performed on LFCR measured by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). (1) To evaluate the relationship between LFCR measured by MRI and ACL injury or rerupture. (2) To compare the LFCR measured by MRI with existing bony morphological risk factors and screen out the most predictive risk factors for primary ACL injury or rerupture. Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Totally 147 patients who underwent knee arthroscopic surgery from 2015 to 2019 with minimum follow-up of 48months were retrospectively evaluated. Patients were placed into three groups: 1) the control group of patients with simple meniscus tears without ligament injury; 2) the primary noncontact ACL injury group; 3) ACL rerupture group (ACL reconstruction failure). The LFCR measured by MRI and other previous known risk factors associated with MRI (notch width index, medial tibial slope, lateral tibial slope, medial tibial depth, lateral tibial height) were performed to evaluate their predictive value for ACL injury and rerupture. All the risk factors with p < 0.01 according to univariate analysis were included in the logistic regression models. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were analyzed for sensitivity, specificity, cut-off, and area under the curve (AUC). Z tests were used to compare the AUC values. The LFCR measured by MRI was obviously higher in primary ACL injury group (0.628 ± 0.020) and in ACL rerupture group (0.625 ± 0.021) than that in the control group (0.593 ± 0.030). The best risk factor was the LFCR with a cut-off of 0.602 (AUC, 0.818; 95% CI, 0.748-0.878; sensitivity, 90%; specificity, 66%). When combined with lateral tibial slope (cutoff, 7°) and lateral tibial height (cutoff, 3.6mm), the diagnostic performance was improved significantly (AUC, 0.896; 95% CI, 0.890-0.950; sensitivity, 87%; specificity, 80%). The increased LFCR measured by MRI was associated with a significantly higher risk for ACL injury or rerupture. The combination of LFCR, lateral tibial slope and lateral tibial height were the most predictive risk factors. This may help clinicians identify susceptible individuals and allow precision approaches for better prevention, treatment and management of this disease.

Single- or two-stage revision after failed ACL reconstruction: No differences in re-revision rates and clinical outcomes.

The surgeons' choice of a single-stage or a two-stage procedure in revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLr) is based on the possibility of reuse of the tibia and femoral bone tunnels after primary ACLr. The purpose of this study was to compare failure rates and clinical outcomes following single-stage and two-stage ACL revisions in a cohort of patients from The Danish Knee Ligament Reconstruction Registry. Patients identified from 2005 to 2022 with ACL revision and met the following criteria: minimum 2-year follow-up, isolated ACL revision and registered single- or two-stage ACL revision. The primary outcome was ACL re-revision rate. Secondary outcomes were arthrometer sagittal knee laxity (side-to-side difference) and pivot shift (rotational stability difference) evaluated at 1-year follow up. One thousand five hundred seventy-four ACL revisions were included in the study (1331 = single-stage and 243 = two stage). Baseline characteristics showed no difference in relation to age, gender, knee laxity, pivot shift, meniscus injury, cartilage damage or injury mechanism between the two groups. Significant differences were found in relation to the type of graft. No statistical difference in 2-years revision rates between single-stage group 2.79 (95% CI 2.03-3.84) and two-stage group 2.93 (95% CI 1.41-6.05) was found. No significant difference was seen in knee laxity and pivot shift between stage-groups at 1-year follow up. Both groups demonstrated significant improvements in knee stability from baseline to 1-year follow-up. The present study found that ACL revision outcomes were similar in terms of rerevision rates and knee laxity for patients managed with a single- or a two-stage surgical strategy. Level III.

The Principles of Knee Joint Preservation

The 3 primary factors involved with preservation of the knee joint include joint alignment, meniscal status, and ligament stability (in particular that of the anterior cruciate ligament [ACL]). These factors are interdependent and result in knee joint homeostasis when all factors are stable. When a deficiency exists in one of the factors, it will affect the others. For example, the ACL and posterior horn of the medial meniscus both act as restraints to anterior tibial translation. Thus, medial meniscal deficiency increases the risk for failure of ACL reconstruction, and chronic ACL insufficiency increases the risk for medial meniscus tears. Furthermore, all 3 of the factors of joint preservation have an impact on the articular cartilage status of the knee joint. Studies have shown that cartilage-preservation procedures do not result in optimal outcomes if there is joint malalignment, meniscal deficiency, or ligament deficiency. When evaluating patients with knee cartilage pathology, surgeons should be aware of the various factors involved in knee joint preservation and, if surgery is indicated, all factors should be addressed in order to support a successful result.

Editorial Comment on the Article by M.S. Ryazantsev et al. “Influence of Posterior Tibial Slope on the Risk of Recurrence After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction”

The failure of ACL reconstruction may occur not only due to repeated injury but also technical errors or biological reasons. The individual patterns of knee morphology addressed in the study of M.S. Ryasantsev et al., particularly tibial slope. Statistically significant difference does not necessarily mean that it leads to clinical impact on the patient. Therefore, all findings should be discussed from the point of minimal clinically relevant difference, especially if the study is underpowered.

Management of anterior cruciate ligament revision in adults: the 2022 ESSKA consensus: part II—surgical strategy

PurposeThe aim of this ESSKA consensus is to give recommendations based on scientific evidence and expert opinion to improve the diagnosis, preoperative planning, indication and surgical strategy in Anterior Cruciate Ligament revision.MethodsPart 2, presented herein, followed exactly the same methodology as Part 1: the so-called ESSKA formal consensus derived from the Delphi method. Eighteen questions were ultimately asked. The quality of the answers received the following grades of recommendation: Grade A (high level scientific support), Grade B (scientific presumption), Grade C (low level scientific support) or Grade D (expert opinion). All answers were scored from 1 to 9 by the raters. Once a general consensus had been reached between the steering and rating groups, the question–answer sets were submitted to the peer-review group. A final combined meeting of all the members of the consensus was then held to ratify the document.ResultsThe review of the literature revealed a rather low scientific quality of studies examining the surgical strategy in cases of ACL reconstruction failure. Of the 18 questions, only 1 received a Grade A rating; 5, a Grade B rating; and 9, grades of C or D. The three remaining complex questions received further evaluations for each portion of the question and were looked at in more detail for the following grades: B and D; A, C and D; or A, B, C and D. The mean rating of all questions by the rating group was 8.0 + − 1.1. The questions and recommendations are listed in the article.ConclusionACL revision surgery, especially the surgical strategy, is a widely debated subject with many different opinions and techniques. The literature reveals a poor level of standardization. Therefore, this international European consensus project is of great importance and clinical relevance for guiding the management of ACL revision in adults.Level of evidenceLevel II.