Faculty Of Intensive Care Medicine Research Articles

Post-ICU psychology support during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Critical illness survival rates have improved, but patients frequently face prolonged new or worsened physical, cognitive and psychosocial impairments. These difficulties associated with critical care admission are known as post-intensive care syndrome (PICS). The multidisciplinary Intensive care Syndrome: Promoting Independence and Return to Employment (InS:PIRE) programme was developed to support patients in the recovery period from critical illness. During the COVID-19 pandemic, the psychology support offered by this service was adapted from an in-person group to individual remote review. This audit evaluated both the extent to which this input aligned with the recommended guidelines and the acceptability of this adapted delivery to this patient group, which could help guide post-pandemic psychology input to the service. The records of 207 patients were analysed retrospectively. The nature of support offered to a sub-sample of 50 patients detailed in clinical summary letters was compared with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (2019) guidelines. Telephone calls were made to gather feedback on the virtual psychology support from 10 patients. Psychological difficulties were identified by 111 of the 207 patients who attended the virtual clinic. A total of 88 of these patients accepted referral for virtual psychology support and 67 (76%) of those patients attended. The virtual psychology support offered was found to be largely in accordance with ICU aftercare guidance and acceptable to patients. Patients found the summary letters of consultations accurate and helpful. Most patients expressed a preference for in-person support and the opportunity to meet other patients. The adaptations to the psychology support offered by InS:PIRE during the COVID-19 pandemic were found to be largely in line with ICU aftercare psychology guidelines and were acceptable to patients. Further research is needed on future methods of delivering psychology support for this patient group. This audit highlights issues important to patients in the post-ICU period based on individual consultations not previously possible. Patient opinion was sought on the impact of changing the delivery of post-ICU psychological support, which will help guide future improvements in the service.

The Quality of transport of adult critically ill patients during inter hospital and intra hospital transfers in a tertiary care facility

Introduction: Critically ill patients are in a dynamic and often precarious physiological state. Adverse events are frequently encountered during transfer of them. A prospective audit was conducted to assess the quality of inter and intra hospital transport of critically ill adults in a tertiary care hospital in Sri Lanka.Methodology: All adult critically ill patients transfer in and out to MICU and ETU Teaching Hospital Anuradhapura were studied for a period of three months. A questionnaire based on The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) guidelines utilized as it is the latest guideline available revised in 2019.Results: Out of 60 transfers analysed, serious adverse events such as cardiac and respiratory arrests were encountered.Conclusions: The overall quality of the transfer process was found to be suboptimal, necessitating proper training in defective areas.

The use of cerebral computed tomographic angiography as an ancillary investigation to support a clinical diagnosis of death using neurological criteria: a consensus guideline

This multidisciplinary consensus statement was produced following a recommendation by the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine to develop a UK guideline for ancillary investigation, when one is required, to support the diagnosis of death using neurological criteria. A multidisciplinary panel reviewed the literature and UK practice in the diagnosis of death using neurological criteria and recommended cerebral CT angiography as the ancillary investigation of choice when death cannot be confirmed by clinical criteria alone. Cerebral CT angiography has been shown to have 100% specificity in supporting a diagnosis of death using neurological criteria and is an investigation available in all acute hospitals in the UK. A standardised technique for performing the investigation is described alongside a reporting template. The panel were unable to make recommendations for ancillary testing in children or patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

Enhanced Care Units: Guidance on development and implementation within Acute Medicine.

The Society for Acute Medicine (SAM) and Intensive Care Society (ICS) have produced joint guidance on the standards of care and infrastructure required to deliver enhanced care within Acute Medicine. The cohort of patients this relates to are in the most part already being looked after on the AMU, but co-location and providing enhanced monitoring and nursing input will ensure safe, high-quality care can be delivered to them. We strongly support the development of enhanced care units, whilst clearly acknowledging that they are not a replacement for critical care where that is indicated. Enhanced care and critical care complement each other and will help foster the close working between the two specialties that modern acute care requires. This guidance draws on expertise and existing relevant guidance from the two societies, alongside that from the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM), British Thoracic Society (BTS), National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) and NHS England / Improvement (NHSE/I). We recognise this is an area with limited evidence and so will aim to review it regularly as the knowledge and experience in this area increases.

Management of transgender patients in critical care.

As clinicians working in critical care, it is our duty to provide all of our patients with the high-quality care they deserve, regardless of their gender identity. The transgender community continues to suffer discrimination from the media, politicians and general public. As healthcare workers we often pride ourselves on our ability to safely care for all patients. However, there remains a distinct lack of understanding surrounding the care of critically ill transgender patients. This is likely in part because the specific care of transgender patients is not included in the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine's, Royal College of Anaesthetists', Royal College of Physician's, or Royal College of Emergency Medicine's curriculum. There are several important considerations relevant for transgender patients in critical care including anatomical changes to the airway, alterations to respiratory and cardiovascular physiology and management of hormone therapy. Alongside this, there are simple but important social factors that exist, such as the use of patient pronouns and ensuring admittance to correctly gendered wards. In this review we will address the key points relevant to the care of transgender patients in critical care and provide suggestions on how education on the subject may be improved.

BACCN position statement on non‐medical prescribing in critical care

AbstractBackgroundThe British Association of Critical Care Nurses (BACCN) published its first position statement on non‐medical prescribing (NMP) in critical care in 2009 (Bray et al., Nurs Crit Care. 2009;14:224‐234). Over the years, more nurses and other health care professionals have become non‐medical prescribers, and the BACCN have thus revisited and updated the statement.AimTo update the 2009 position statement on NMP in critical care to reflect contemporary guidance and practice.Study designA working group was established following an expression of interest to BACCN members, and the original BACCN position statement and literature review were updated using key databases. An electronic questionnaire was developed by the working group to describe current NMP practises and the authorization and prescribing of blood and blood components. It was distributed via email to 1861 BACCN members and on BACCN social media in October and November 2021.ResultsTwo hundred and fifty nine health care professionals from the four countries of the United Kingdom completed the survey, and of these 136 (52.5%) respondents were BACCN members. One hundred and five (40.4%) of the respondents described themselves as non‐medical prescribers, and of these, 57 (54.8%) were independent prescribers and 47 (45.2%) were supplementary and independent prescribers, with one respondent not revealing. The remaining 154 (59.4%) respondents were not registered as non‐medical prescribers. Ninety‐one (86.7%) of the respondents who were non‐medical prescribers reported making prescribing decisions on every clinical shift, and 67 (64.4%) of these audited their prescribing practises. Of the 105 who described themselves as non‐medical prescribers, 71 (67.6%) had been in their area of practice for more than 5 years before they became non‐medical prescribers, with 3 (2.8%) being in the practise area for less than 1 year.All seven statements from Bray et al's (2009) position statement were revised and updated following the survey results and review of the literature search.ConclusionsThe updated position statement is based upon new policy documents from a range of sources, including the Nursing and Midwifery Council, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society. It takes account of the adult critical care patient pathway before, during and after an admission to critical care.Relevance to clinical practiceNon‐medical prescribing (NMP) should only be implemented to improve the safety and quality of care for the critically ill or deteriorating patient. The requirement for NMP needs to be determined locally by organizations, ensuring that the care of the critically ill and deteriorating patient is the main reason. NMP must not be used as a substitute for unsafe medical practice or poor medical prescribing practice. Non‐medical prescribers must adhere to the current Royal Pharmaceutical Society's Prescribing Competency Framework and must be registered with their professional regulatory body. Non‐medical prescribers must audit and evaluate their practice as well as ensuring continuing professional development. Non‐medical prescribers in critical care must consider how their own professional codes of conduct, scope of practice, standards and guidelines impact their prescribing decisions. Non‐medical prescribers must work collaboratively to ensure that continuity and transfer of care between care settings consider deprescribing and medicines reconciliation.

Impact of Enhanced PeriOperative Care in restoring high-risk surgery at an acute tertiary hospital during the COVID-19 pandemic

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic led to an exceptional demand on critical care services and dramatic reduction in elective surgical capacity within our hospital, a large acute tertiary centre. To facilitate high-risk elective surgery and to ease pressure on our critical care unit (CCU), an Enhanced PeriOperative Care (EPOC) unit was established in June 2020. The EPOC service was set up within the framework and guidance offered by the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM).1 We evaluated the impact of EPOC on restoring high-risk elective surgery.

'Better together: collaborative working between emergency medicine and critical care': 1 year on, is this framework still relevant?

In 2021 the Royal College of Emergency Medicine and the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine collaborated to launch the 'Better together' framework to improve outcomes for critically unwell patients in the resuscitation room. One year on from the launch, it remains more relevant than ever.

Nasogastric tube never events during the Covid-19 crisis in the UK; fewer than predicted.

Early in the Covid-19 pandemic, the NGSIG predicted the number of sick Covid-19 patients requiring nasogastric tube (NGT) feeding in critical care and high dependency areas would increase dramatically with consequent increased risk of unrecognised misplacement leading to Never Events (NE) and/or pneumothorax. Based on our Position Paper on NGT safety1 we produced an Aide Memoire2 with NHSE/I endorsed by NNNG (National Nutrition Nurse Group), The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine, The Intensive Care Society, The Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Association of Anaesthetists before publication2.

Evaluating clinical pharmacist involvement in a COVID-19 intensive care recovery clinic

Introduction: Post-intensive care syndrome (PICS) is associated with an increased risk of mortality. Critical illness recovery clinics have been recommended by the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (FICM) as an approach to manage the complexity of PICS. The COVID-19 pandemic has provided many healthcare challenges, not least how to support those who have survived critical […]

Controversies in airway management of COVID-19 patients: updated information and international expert consensus recommendations

Controversies in airway management of COVID-19 patients: updated information and international expert consensus recommendations

COVID-19 Preparedness Within the Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthetic Ecosystem in Sub-Saharan Africa.

COVID-19 Preparedness Within the Surgical, Obstetric, and Anesthetic Ecosystem in Sub-Saharan Africa.

Consensus guidelines for managing the airway in patients with COVID-19: Guidelines from the Difficult Airway Society, the Association of Anaesthetists the Intensive Care Society, the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Royal College of Anaesthetists.

SummarySevere acute respiratory syndrome‐corona virus‐2, which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID‐19), is highly contagious. Airway management of patients with COVID‐19 is high risk to staff and patients. We aimed to develop principles for airway management of patients with COVID‐19 to encourage safe, accurate and swift performance. This consensus statement has been brought together at short notice to advise on airway management for patients with COVID‐19, drawing on published literature and immediately available information from clinicians and experts. Recommendations on the prevention of contamination of healthcare workers, the choice of staff involved in airway management, the training required and the selection of equipment are discussed. The fundamental principles of airway management in these settings are described for: emergency tracheal intubation; predicted or unexpected difficult tracheal intubation; cardiac arrest; anaesthetic care; and tracheal extubation. We provide figures to support clinicians in safe airway management of patients with COVID‐19. The advice in this document is designed to be adapted in line with local workplace policies.

In Memoriam: Brian Kavanagh, 1962 to 2019

In Memoriam: Brian Kavanagh, 1962 to 2019

Professional Quality of Life in intensive care medicine: The 2018 Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Workforce survey.

Critical care is widely perceived, both within and outside of the speciality, as unremitting and emotionally burdensome. There is a perception of a higher risk to medical staff of burnout than other specialities. Critical care also has considerable emotional and professional rewards. We sought to examine this balance between emotional reward and stress in UK critical care consultants registered with the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine. We conducted a Wellbeing survey of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine consultant membership utilising the Professional Quality of Life (Pro-QOL) survey tool. The survey was conducted as part of the Annual Workforce Census. In sum, 799 members completed the Pro-QOL survey, making this one of the largest surveys of physician wellbeing in critical care medicine. Data were analysed in accordance with the Pro-QOL manual. The results demonstrate moderate risk for burnout and secondary traumatic stress, but this is balanced by moderate compassion satisfaction. No association was demonstrated between age, sex, or size of critical care unit worked in. Further follow-up of this consultant group is warranted to better understand risk factors for burnout and for future mitigation of these risk factors whilst also enhancing the positive aspects of working as a consultant in critical care medicine.

Guidelines on the management of acute respiratory distress syndrome

The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and Intensive Care Society Guideline Development Group have used GRADE methodology to make the following recommendations for the management of adult patients with acute...

Genesis of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand.

In 2009 the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) of Australia and New Zealand was inaugurated in Melbourne, Australia. This College now regulates the education, training and accreditation for specialist intensivists for Australia and New Zealand. CICM origins started in 1975 with the formation of the Section of Intensive Care of the Faculty of Anaesthetists, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), which moved through intermediary stages as the Faculty of Intensive Care, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) when that College was formed from the former Faculty of Anaesthetists RACS, and then the Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (ANZCA and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians [RACP]), until becoming completely independent as CICM in 2010. There was a period of about 40-50 years evolution from the first formations of intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand, and discussions by the personnel staffing those units amongst themselves and with Members of the Board of the Faculty of Anaesthetists RACS, to the formation of the Section of Intensive Care, then through two intermediary Faculties of Intensive Care Medicine, to the final independent formation of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand in 2010.

The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine Workforce Survey - What impacts on our working lives?

The Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine distributes an annual survey to its Consultants, allowing the evaluation of workforce profile, working patterns and the opportunity for analysis of key information on issues affecting these. We undertook an exploratory review of the data provided within the 2016 survey, with the aim of identifying themes within respondents stated career intentions and associated factors. Given the modest (36%) response rate, we are unable to draw conclusions with certainty, but there are indications within the data that the UK Intensive Care Medicine consultant body is facing significant stressors whilst at work, due to working patterns and limited resources. The data within the 2016 survey provide a base from which to develop future Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine workforce surveys that will extract data about the positive aspects of a career in intensive care medicine. The survey data provide a signal that there may be significant potentially modifiable stressors for intensive care doctors, and as such affords support for initiatives to improve job planning and sharing of implemented solutions, as well as a need to focus on workforce wellbeing as an important and necessary contributor to patient safety within intensive care medicine.

Genesis of the College of Intensive Care Medicine of Australia and New Zealand

Background: In 2008, the College of Intensive Care Medicine (CICM) of Australian and New Zealand was inaugurated in Melbourne, Australia. This College now regulates the education, training and accreditation for specialist intensivists for Australia and New Zealand. CICM origins started in 1975 with the formation of the Intensive Care Section of the Faculty of Anaesthetists, Royal Australasian College of Surgeons (RACS), which moved through intermediary stages as the Faculty of Intensive Care, Australian and New Zealand College of Anaesthetists (ANZCA) when that College was formed from the former Faculty of Anaesthetists RACS, and then the Joint Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine (ANZCA and the Royal Australasian College of Physicians), until becoming completely independent as CICM in 2010.

Management of perceived devastating brain injury after hospital admission: a consensus statement from stakeholder professional organizations

Patients with severe grades of life-threatening brain injury are commonly characterized as having devastating brain injury (DBI), which we have defined as: ‘any neurological condition that is assessed at the time of hospital admission as an immediate threat to life or incompatible with good functional recovery AND where early limitation or withdrawal of therapy is being considered’. The outcome in patients with DBI is often death or severe disability, and as a consequence rapid withdrawal of life sustaining therapies is commonly contemplated or undertaken. However, accurate prognostication in life-threatening brain injury is difficult, particularly at an early stage. Evidence from controlled studies to guide decision-making is limited, and there is a risk of a ‘self-fulfilling prophecy’, with early prognostication leading to early withdrawal of life sustaining therapies and death. The Joint Professional Standards committee of the Faculty of Intensive Care Medicine and the Intensive Care Society convened a consensus group with representation from stakeholder professional organizations to develop clear professional guidance in this area. It recognized that the weak evidence base makes GRADE guidelines difficult to justify. We have made 12 practical, pragmatic recommendations to help clinicians deliver safe, effective, equitable, and justifiable care within resource constrained healthcare systems. In the situation where patient-centred outcomes are recognized to be unacceptable, regardless of the extent of neurological improvement, then early transition to palliative care is appropriate. These recommendations are intended to apply where the primary pathology is DBI, rather than where DBI has compounded a progressive and irreversible deterioration in other life-threatening comorbidities.