Facet Violation Research Articles

Comparison of rostral facet joint violations in robotic- and navigation-assisted pedicle screw placement for adult lumbar spine instrumentation

BACKGROUND CONTEXTFacet joint violation by pedicle screws may lead to adjacent-segment disease and postoperative pain. Previous studies have reported the incidence of rostral facet joint violation using various pedicle screw insertion techniques. However, the incidence of facet joint violations with robotic guidance has not been determined. PURPOSETo investigate and compare the incidence of rostral facet joint violation by pedicle screws under robotic guidance and computerized tomography (CT) navigation guidance. STUDY DESIGN/SETTINGRetrospective matched cohort. PATIENT SAMPLEAll patients who underwent robotic-assisted lumbar fusion at a major spine center up until 2023 were retrospectively identified and matched 1:3 to patients undergoing CT navigation guidance based by on age, sex, rostral vertebral level, and length of construct. Inclusion criteria consisted of age greater than 18 years, bilateral pedicle screw fixation, and presence of a postoperative CT scan of the lumbar spine or abdomen/pelvis at any point in the postoperative period. OUTCOME MEASURESRostral facet joint violations. METHODSDescriptive statistics were used to compare cohorts: frequencies, chi-squared analysis for categorical variables, and t-test for continuous variables. RESULTSA total of 408 rostral pedicle screws were implanted in 204 patients (Robot: 102; Navigation: 306). Overall, 13 (12.3%) rostral facet joint violations were observed in the robot cohort and 75 (24.5%) in the navigation cohort (p=.01). Specifically, fewer robotic violations were observed at the L2 (3.5% vs 32.1%, p=.003) and L3 levels (3.9% vs 18.1%, p=.08) compared to navigation. No difference was observed at L4 and L5. Bilateral violations are significantly reduced with robotic approaches (5.3% vs 14.4%, p=.03). Lastly, more facet joint violations were observed during open approaches (robot: 18.8%, navigation: 27.3%) than percutaneous approaches (robot: 11.6%, navigation: 7.1%) in both groups (p<.001). The rate of L4 facet violations was 18.8% in the robotic cohort and 27.3% in the navigation cohort. The rate of L5 facet violations was 31.3% in the robotic cohort and 29.2% in the navigation cohort. CONCLUSIONSUse of robotic assistance in lumbar pedicle screws significantly reduced the rate of rostral facet joint violations compared to navigation guidance at L2 and L3 levels, but not at L4 and L5, with facet violations approaching nearly one-third of the patients at L5 screws. Rostral facet violations can play a significant role in adjacent segment degeneration and disease. Technical factors and trajectory issues likely play a role and addressing these components should minimize unintended facet violation and proximal adding on.

Long-Term Incidence of Adjacent Segmental Pathology After Minimally Invasive vs. Open Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.

Retrospective cohort study. To compare the incidence of adjacent segmental pathology (ASP) following minimally invasive (MI) vs open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) and to identify factors linked to ASP requiring reoperation. This retrospective study reviewed the outcomes of patients who underwent MI-TLIF or open TLIF. Radiographic ASP (RASP) was evaluated using X-ray imaging to distinguish between degenerative changes, spondylolisthesis, and instability in the adjacent spinal segment. Clinical ASP (CASP) was assessed with the visual analog scale score for leg and back pain and the Oswestry disability index. Patient data were collected 1, 2, 5, and 10 years postoperatively. The timing and frequency of ASP reoperation were analyzed. Five years postoperatively, the RASP rate was 35.23% and 45.95% in the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups. The frequency of CASP differed significantly between the MI-TLIF and open TLIF groups at 1 year postoperatively. The rates of RASP, CASP, and ASP necessitating reoperation were not significantly different 10years postoperatively. Cranial facet violation significantly affected ASP in both groups. In the open TLIF group, preoperative adjacent segment disc degeneration significantly influenced ASP. The RASP rate at 5years postoperatively and the CASP rate at 1year postoperatively differed significantly between groups. There was no difference in the rate of ASP requiring reoperation. Cranial facet violation is a crucial driving factor for ASP after both surgical procedures.

Conventional vs Augmented Reality-Guided Lateral Calcaneal Lengthening Simulated in a Foot Bone Model.

Acquired adult flatfoot deformity (AAFD) results in a loss of the medial longitudinal arch of the foot and dysfunction of the posteromedial soft tissues. Hintermann osteotomy (H-O) is often used to treat stage II AAFD. The procedure is challenging because of variations in the subtalar facets and limited intraoperative visibility. We aimed to assess the impact of augmented reality (AR) guidance on surgical accuracy and the facet violation rate. Sixty AR-guided and 60 conventional osteotomies were performed on foot bone models. For AR osteotomies, the ideal osteotomy plane was uploaded to a Microsoft HoloLens 1 headset and carried out in strict accordance with the superimposed holographic plane. The conventional osteotomies were performed relying solely on the anatomy of the calcaneal lateral column. The rate and severity of facet joint violation was measured, as well as accuracy of entry and exit points. The results were compared across AR-guided and conventional osteotomies, and between experienced and inexperienced surgeons. Experienced surgeons showed significantly greater accuracy for the osteotomy entry point using AR, with the mean deviation of 1.6 ± 0.9 mm (95% CI 1.26, 1.93) compared to 2.3 ± 1.3 mm (95% CI 1.87, 2.79) in the conventional method (P = .035). The inexperienced had improved accuracy, although not statistically significant (P = .064), with the mean deviation of 2.0 ± 1.5 mm (95% CI 1.47, 2.55) using AR compared with 2.7 ± 1.6 mm (95% CI 2.18, 3.32) in the conventional method. AR helped the experienced surgeons avoid full violation of the posterior facet (P = .011). Inexperienced surgeons had a higher rate of middle and posterior facet injury with both methods (P = .005 and .021). Application of AR guidance during H-O was associated with improved accuracy for experienced surgeons, demonstrated by a better accuracy of the osteotomy entry point. More crucially, AR guidance prevented full violation of the posterior facet in the experienced group. Further research is needed to address limitations and test this technology on cadaver feet. Ultimately, the use of AR in surgery has the potential to improve patient and surgeon safety while minimizing radiation exposure. Subtalar facet injury during lateral column lengthening osteotomy represents a real problem in clinical orthopaedic practice. Because of limited intraoperative visibility and variable anatomy, it is hard to resolve this issue with conventional means. This study suggests the potential of augmented reality to improve the osteotomy accuracy.

EVALUATION OF CLINICAL OUTCOMES AND ACCURACY IN TRANSPEDICULAR SCREW FIXATION USING INTRAOPERATIVE CT-GUIDED NAVIGATION FOR LUMBAR SPONDYLOLISTHESIS

The use of intraoperative navigation and robotic surgery for minimally invasive lumbar fusion has been increasing over the past decade. The aim of this study is to evaluate postoperative clinical outcomes, intraoperative parameters, and accuracy of pedicle screw insertion guided by intraoperative navigation in patients undergoing lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis. Patients who underwent posterior lumbar fusion interbody using intraoperative 3D navigation since December 2021 were included. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), and Short Form Health Survey-36 (SF-36) were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1, 3, and 6 months. Screw placement accuracy, measured by Gertzbein and Robbins classification, and facet joint infringement, measured by Yson classification, were assessed by intraoperative Cone Beam CT scans performed at the end of instrumentation. Finally, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, hospital stay, and screw insertion time were evaluated. This study involved 50 patients with a mean age of 63.7 years. VAS decreased from 65.8±23 to 20±22 (p&lt;.01). ODI decreased from 35.4%±15 to 11.8%±14 (p&lt;.01). An increase of SF-36 from 51.5±14 to 76±13 (p&lt;.01) was demonstrated. The accuracy of “perfect” and “clinically acceptable” pedicle screw fixation was 89.5% and 98.4%, respectively. Regarding facet violation, 96.8% of the screws were at grade 0. Finally, the average screw insertion time was 4.3±2 min, hospital stay was 4.2±0.8 days, operation time was 205±53 min, and blood loss was 169±107 ml. Finally, a statistically significant correlation of operation time with hospital stay, blood loss and placement time per screw was found. We demonstrated excellent results for accuracy of pedicle screw fixation and violation of facet joints. VAS, ODI and SF-36 showed statistically significant improvements from the control at one month after surgery.Navigation with intraoperative 3D images represents an effective system to improve operative performance in the surgical treatment of spondylolisthesis.

Accuracy of Lateral Mass Screw Insertion during Cervical Spine Surgery without Fluoroscopic Guidance and Comparison of Postoperative Screw Loosening Rate among Unicortical and Bicortical Screws Using Computed Tomography.

Pedicle screws (PSs) or lateral mass screws (LMSs) are used in posterior cervical spine fixation. The former are more firmly fixed but are associated with the risk of neurovascular injury and should be inserted using intraoperative imaging or navigation, which may prolong the surgical duration and is not feasible in all hospitals. This prospective clinical study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of LMS insertions without fluoroscopic guidance and screw loosening rates at 6 months postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). We examined 38 patients who underwent posterior cervical spine fusion using 206 LMSs in the C3-C6 range between January 2018 and July 2021. The direction of screw insertion followed the Magerl method, and we inserted screws as bicortically as possible without intraoperative imaging. The screw position was examined using CT at 1 week postoperatively. Screw insertion angles, bicortical insertion rate, facet violation, and neurovascular injury were evaluated. Screw loosening with unicortical and bicortical screws (US and BS, respectively) was investigated using CT at 6 months postoperatively. The average LMS length was 14.1 mm. The average axial and sagittal angles were 33.9° and 29.2°, respectively. Among the 206 LMSs inserted, 167 were BS; of these, 94.6% had screw length protrusion of 0-2 mm. Facet violation was observed in 3.4% of all screws but without neurovascular injury. Six months postoperatively, loosening of 25 screws (12.1%) occurred, including 17 (18.3%) USs and 8 (8.39%) BSs. The screw loosening rate was significantly higher in US than for BS (43.6% [17/39] vs. 4.8% [8/167], P<0.01). Over 80% of LMSs were inserted bicortically without intraoperative imaging. By devising the screw length selection process, we inserted for screw loosening was more common in US and more likely at the fixed end.

Incidence and risk factors associated with superior-segmented facet joint violation during minimal invasive lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND CONTEXTThe trend of minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion is increasing, and adjacent segmental degeneration (ASD) is one of the complications of the procedures in which facet joint violation (FJV) is a cause. FJVs can occur during percutaneous instrumentation. This study aimed to identify the risk factors that affect FJV during minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion. PURPOSETo identify the risk factors for FJVs and the factors that have a strong impact on the violation. STUDY DESIGNRetrospective study. PATIENT SAMPLEPatients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous screw fixation between June 2018 and December 2019. OUTCOME MEASURESPrevalence of the FJV was reviewed by CT scans which obtained within 6 months after surgery, and the axial, coronal, and sagittal cuts of the scans were evaluated. The FJV was defined as the screw being visible in the facet joint in at least one plane of the CT scan. Radiographic parameters were measured using CT scans including diameters of the facet joints in the axial, coronal, and sagittal planes defined by the facet diameter. The facet angle (FA), the pedicle angle (PA), the screw-facet angle (SFA), the screw-endplate angle (SEA), and the superior margin of the facet joint in the sagittal plane (SD) differed from the head of the screw. At Last, the depth of back muscle was measured in the axial cut of the MRI. METHODSThis study analyzed 119 patients who underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion between June 2018 and December 2019. Facet joint violation at the uppermost level was examined using CT in all dimensions. Radiographic parameters (facet diameter, facet angle, pedicle angle, screw-facet angle, screw-endplate angle, and distance between the head of the screws and the facet) were measured. BMI, age, diagnosis, and navigation assistance were included in the study. Risk factors were analyzed to determine which factors had an effect on FJV, and the cut-off was calculated for each parameter. RESULTSThis study included 119 patients, with a mean age of 63 years. FJV occurred in 13/119 (10.9%) patients and 15/238 (6.3%) joints, respectively. No FJV occurred in 120 joints operated with navigation-assistance and 15/178 (8.4%) joints operated without navigation (p=.01). We found an increasing proportion of violations at more caudal levels: no violations occurred in eight patients with lumbar at L1 or L2, and 1/40 (2.5%), 7/158 (4.4%), and 7/32 (21.9%) of violations occurred at L3, L4, and L5, respectively (p=.01). The diameter of the facet in the axial cut, facet angle, screw facet angle, and distance between the head of the screw and facet were statistically significant in determining the increasing rate of FJV after multivariate analysis was performed (AROC=0.9486, p≤.05). The cutoff point for each radiographic parameter were diameter of facet in the axial ≥17.5 mm, diameter of facet in coronal plane ≥19.5 mm, facet angle ≥41.5o, screw-facet angle ≥39o, and distance between facet and the screw ≥-2.6 mm. The estimated probability of FJV was 96.9% when every parameter was greater than the cut-off point. CONCLUSIONSAn increase in the facet diameter in the axial plane, coronal plane, facet angle, screw facet angle, and the distance between the dome of the screw and facet are risk factors for FJV. Surgeons can avoid violations when radiographic considerations are done. Careful screw placement and good entry points for instrumentation may decrease the rate of facet violation.

Anatomical considerations for appropriate mini-plate positioning in open-door laminoplasty to avoid plate impingement and screw facet violation

This study aimed to describe a safe zone for mini-plate positioning that can avoid instrument-related complications in laminoplasty. Fifty-one patients who underwent laminoplasty and were followed up for at least 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. The posterior surface length and inferior pole angle of the lateral mass were measured at each level using computed tomography. The safe zone was defined based on these measurements. Incidences of screw facet violation and plate impingement were recorded. Patient-reported outcome measures were compared between the appropriate position (AP) and inappropriate position (IP) groups. Among 40 patients included, 15 (37.5%) had inappropriate plate positioning, causing screw facet violation or plate impingement, which more commonly occurred at distal (C5, C6) and proximal (C3, C4) levels, respectively. Lateral mass posterior surface length was shorter at the proximal levels, and the inferior pole angle of the lateral mass was smaller at the distal levels, signifying that the lateral mass became thin and long at the distal levels. Patient-reported outcome measures were not significantly different between the two groups. However, cervical range of motion at the final follow-up was significantly less in the IP group (p = 0.01). The suggested safe zone demonstrates that inserting the mini-plate with plate-to-lateral mass inferior pole distances of 4–5 mm and 5–6 mm at the C3–C5 and C6–C7 levels, respectively, would avoid instrument-related complications. The risk of plate impingement was higher at the proximal level, whereas the risk of screw facet violation was higher at the distal level in open-door cervical laminoplasty. These risks coincide with anatomical differences at each level. Despite inappropriate positioning of the mini-plate, clinical outcomes were not adversely affected.

Adjacent Segment Degeneration after Short-Segment Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion (LLIF)

Purpose To investigate the influence on the adjacent segment degeneration (ASD) of short-segment lateral lumbar interbody fusion (LLIF) at 2 years postoperatively. Methods Ninety-seven consecutive patients who underwent one- or two-level LLIF were included from two institutions. We diagnosed radiographical adjacent segment degeneration with the appearance of adjacent spondylolisthesis (>3 mm) or deterioration of adjacent disk height (>3 mm) on plain radiographs or decrease of the intervertebral angle (>5 degrees). The differences between the two groups with and without radiographical ASD were investigated using univariate and multivariate analyses to determine the risk factors for ASD. The variables included extent of adjacent decompression, posterior fixation method (open method or percutaneous method), and facet violation on postoperative CT. Results In total, 19 patients (19.6%) were diagnosed as radiographical ASD 2 years after surgery. Univariate analysis showed that the ASD (+) group had a high frequency of adjacent decompression (21.1 vs. 3.8%, p = 0.035) compared with the ASD (-) group. There were no differences between the two groups in posterior fusion method (percutaneous method 42.1 vs. 57.7%, p = 0.221) or facet joint violation (15.8 vs. 14.1%, p = 0.860). The multivariate analysis found adjacent intervertebral decompression to be a risk factor for ASD 2 years after surgery (odds ratio: 9.95; 95% confidence interval: 1.2–82.1). Conclusions Adjacent intervertebral decompression was considered to be a potential risk factor for the development of ASD after spinal fusion with LLIF.

Navigate and Succeed: MI-Transforminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Three-Dimensional Navigation

Introduction: Lumbar Interbody Fusion (TLIF) has become a popular technique for achieving segmental interbody fusion and minimal access approach has its advantages. We have described the various Components in Spine Navigation Systems and how they have evolved in time and also describing our technique in detail. We have discussed on the advantages and disadvantages of the minimal access and use of Navigation. Method: The authors ventured to assess the impact of 3D navigation in 117 patients that were treated with single level 3D navigated MI-TLIF in evaluating, Navigation setting time , Radiation exposure, Disc space preparation, Cage placement, Accuracy of pedicle screw placement, Cranial facet violation and Evaluation of canal decompression. Result: Total time taken for setting up of navigation was 46.65±9.45 min. Average Radiation exposure was 5.69 mSv. In our study, the amount of disc removed was 75% in the ipsilateral anterior, 81% in ipsilateral posterior, 63% in contralateral anterior and 43% in contralateral posterior quadrants. The cage position was central in 87 patients, contralateral antero-central in six patients and ipsilateral postero-central in eight patients. The mean intraoperative blood loss was 89.65 ± 23.67 ml. Regarding accuracy 95.6% showed grade 0 and 4.4% had Grade 1 pedicle breach. Only 25 out of 408 pedicle screws (6.1%) violated the cranial facet joint. The navigation array probe was utilized to verify the adequacy of decompression and to confirm the anatomical landmarks. In our study, no surgical site infection was seen. Conclusion: We find MIS to be associated with less post-operative infection rates as compared to open techniques. With 3D navigation, MIS becomes safer and highly accurate. MIS-TLIF with 3D navigation have satisfactory clinical outcomes and fusion rates with the additional benefits of less initial postoperative pain, less blood loss, earlier rehabilitation, and shorter hospitalization. MIS–TLIF with 3D navigation is a more cost-effective treatment than MIS-TLIF with fluoroscopy.

Better Functional Outcome and Pain Relief in the Far-Lateral-Outside-in Percutaneous Endoscopic Transforaminal Discectomy.

BackgroundEven though percutaneous endoscopic transforaminal discectomy (PETD) has been widely used for the surgical treatment of lumbar herniated disc, there are only a few studies directly comparing the clinical outcomes between microdiscectomy (MD) and PETD. Therefore, further studies are needed in order to compare the clinical outcomes between PETD and MD on a single level more thoroughly.MethodsWe proposed a far-lateral-outside-in technique for PETD to get an entry point without complex planning and facet violation. From September 2017 to September 2019, a total of 155 patients (69 with PETD and 86 with MD) were enrolled for this retrospective study, with the inclusion criteria: single level between L2 and S1, clinical sciatica for at least 6 weeks, and failed attempts with non-surgical treatments. Patients were excluded due to cauda equina syndrome, progressive neurologic deficits, history of lumbar spinal surgery, endplate modic changes, severe disc degeneration and less than 24 months of follow-up.ResultsPETD showed significantly shorter surgery time and less intraoperative blood loss compared to MD. The difference between PETD and MD in VAS back pain (but not VAS leg pain) at follow-up time was significant. The ODI improvement in the follow-up time of 6 months between the 2 groups showed a significant difference (PETD: 31.23±6.59, MD: 39.85±7.81, p < 0.001). MD had a significantly higher chance of postoperative wound infection and poor healing, while PETD was more likely to have recurrence of the herniated disc.ConclusionMD has been the gold standard procedure for LDH. However, with the advanced endoscopic technology and surgical technique, PETD has emerged as an alternative method due to higher functional outcome and less wound problems.

Facet Joint Violation by Thoracolumbar Percutaneous Pedicle Screw and Its Effect on Progression of Facet Joint Osteoarthritis.

Study DesignA retrospective study.PurposeThis study aimed to investigate the rate and associated factors of facet violation (FV) in percutaneous pedicle screws (PPS) from the thoracic to the lumbar spine and the effect of FV on facet osteoarthritis (OA) progression.Overview of LiteratureSome reports claim PPS has a higher FV rate than conventional open surgery. However, previous reports of FV in PPS were limited to the lumbar spine; only a few reports included the thoracic spine.MethodsThe present study includes 1,028 PPS inserted from T4 to S1 in 218 patients. The rate of FV and facet OA progression after FV were assessed using computed tomography (CT) scans conducted postoperatively at 1 week and 6 months or more. To identify factors associated with FV or facet OA progression after FV, a multivariate logistic regression analysis was conducted. To investigate whether FV caused facet OA progression, we compared OA progression between patients with FV and matched controls.ResultsFV was observed in 68 (6.6%) of the 1,028 facets, and the thoracic spine was identified as an independent factor associated with FV. OA progression was detected in 48.2% of the cases with FV via CT scans conducted postoperatively at a mean duration of 22.6 months. The time between CT scans was identified as an independent factor for facet OA progression after FV. The rate of OA progression in patients with FV was significantly greater than that of the controls.ConclusionsFV was observed in 6.6% of the patients, and the thoracic spine was identified as an independent factor associated with FV. OA progression of a violated facet occurs over time. FV is considered a complication leading to facet OA progression.

A new technique useful for lumbosacral percutaneous pedicle screw placement without fluoroscopy or computer-aided navigation systems

BackgroundPercutaneous pedicle screw (PPS) placements in the lumbosacral spine generally rely on fluoroscopy at the expense of radiation exposure. Our accumulated experience in open PS placements without fluoroscopic guidance realized a consistent shift toward PPS insertion with newly developed devices, which require neither fluoroscopy nor navigation. We wish to report our new technique and evaluations of its accuracy. MethodsOur equipment consisted of a pedicle targeting tool to identify and escort the cannulated awl to the correct starting point for cortical bone perforation and a cannulated awl-probe system with a guidewire to maintain the optimal position throughout the subsequent surgical steps. The surgeon could advance the blunt-tipped probe searching for the cancellous bone track using tactile feedback as experienced in open techniques. A 2-year period of transition from a free-hand (1169 screws in 286 patients) to the new PPS technique (1933 screws in 413 patients) allowed accuracy comparison between the two procedures using postoperative CT scans. ResultsCompared with the open-group, the PPS-group showed a lower rate of fully contained intrapedicular PS placements at L1 through S1, as a whole (90.7% vs 85.4%), but not at L4 through S1 (89.9% vs 90.2%). Less-accurate PPS placements at upper than lower lumbar spines in part reflect intended pedicle perforations laterally as a trade-off for avoiding facet violation immediately above the most cephalad screw. The PPS-group also had a higher incidence of PS-related transient nerve root complications (0% vs 1.7%). These values for the PPS-group, however, fell within those previously reported for free-hand or fluoroscopy techniques. ConclusionsOur new PPS technique, although useful for eliminating the potential risk of repeated radiation exposure, fell short of reaching the accuracy of the free-hand technique. Nerve integrity monitoring with PS stimulation, which we currently use, will help further improve the technical precision. Study designOriginal Article. The study was approved by our institutional review boad (2,019,231).

P20. Predisposing risk factors of the facet joint violation in the lumbar spinal fusion during the instrumentation of minimal invasive spinal surgery

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Trending of minimal invasive surgery is increased and adjacent segmental degeneration is the one of the complications sequentially from the procedures which the facet joint injury is one of the causes. The patients who have ASD have vary symptoms such as back pain, neurological compression and instability and some of them required the second or third operation. The facet joint violation can occur during the instrumentation which the surgeons had known the facet joint indirectly visualization. Risk factors of the facet joint violation have the many considerations such as the patient characteristics, facet anatomy, surgical techniques and radiographic assisted. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> Identify the risk factors which have affected the facet joint violation during the minimal invasive spinal surgery. <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Retrospective study which is an analysis of 119 patients who have had the minimal invasive spinal surgery from June 2018 to December 2019. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> A total of 119 patients who have had the minimal invasive lumbar spinal surgery with percutaneous pedicular screw placed from June 2018 to December 2019. All patients had the CT and MRI scan postoperatively within 6 months after the operation will include to our study. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> Facet joint violation at the uppermost level was examined by the CT scan in all dimensions. The facet joint violation defined as the instrument was breeched into the facet joint. We classified these findings as in the facet violation group. The none violation was classified into non-facet violation group. Radiographic parameters (Facet diameter, facet angle, pedicle angle, screw-facet angle, screw-endplate angle and distance between head of screws and facet) were measured. BMI, age, diagnosis and navigation-assisted were included. Risk factor were analyzed and determined which factor have had an effect to the facet joint violation and scoring system for the risk factor was calculated. <h3>METHODS</h3> This study is an analysis of 119 patients who have had the minimal invasive spinal surgery from June 2018 to December 2019. Facet joint violation at the uppermost level was examined by the CT scan in all dimensions. Radiographic parameters (Facet diameter, facet angle, pedicle angle, screw-facet angle, screw-endplate angle and distance between head of screws and facet) were measured. BMI, age, diagnosis and navigation-assisted were included. Risk factor were analyzed and determined which factor have had an effect to the facet joint violation and scoring system for the risk factor was calculated. <h3>RESULTS</h3> A total of 119 patients, 36 males and 83 females, patients mean age was 63 years old, diagnosis was 38 patients had SCS, 54 patients had spondylolisthesis, 17 had HNP, 4 had degenerative scoliosis and 6 had degenerative disc disease. Facet violation was determined 1 patient at L1, 3 patients at L2, 20 patients at L3, 79 patients at L4 and 16 patients at L5. Facet joint violation occurred in 13/119(10.9%) and 15/238(6.3%) joints. No facet joint violation occurred in 60 patients who navigation-assisted was used, versus 15/178(8.4%) joints where there was no navigation(P=0.01). We found an increasing proportion of violations as the lumbar level increased: no violations occurred in 8 patients with lumbar at L1 or L2, 1/40(2.5%), 7/158(4.4%) and 7/32 (21.9%) of violations occurred at L3, L4 and L5, respectively (P=0.01). Although it was not statistically significant, the percentage of violations was higher in patients with scoliosis (12.5%) and DDD (16.7%). Diameter of facet in axial cut, facet angle, screw facet angle and distance between head of screw and facet was statistically significant to determine increasing rate of facet joint violations after multivariable analysis was done (AROC=0.9486, P≤0.05). <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Increasing of the facet diameter in axial plane, facet angle, screw facet angle and distance between dome of screw and facet are one of the risk factor of facet joint violation. Surgeon can avoid the violation when the radiographic consideration was done. Careful screw placement and make the good entry points for instrumentation will decrease rate of facet violation. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

20. Biomechanical effect of facet joint violation on adjacent segment motion and disc strain following single level lumbar fusion with transpedicular screw and rod instrumentation

<h3>BACKGROUND CONTEXT</h3> Facet joint violation (FV) is a complication occurring while placing pedicle screws at the upper-most level using an entry point and trajectory too close to the superior facet joint. The incidence of FV has been reported up to be as high as 50%. However, little is known about how FV affects superior adjacent level spinal stability and especially intervertebral disc (IVD) strain after lumbar fusion. <h3>PURPOSE</h3> To investigate the biomechanical effects of FV in terms of mobility and disc surface strains at the upper level adjacent to L4-5 pedicle screw-rod fixation (PSR) in cadaveric specimens. The disc strain was studied with a new optical technique of soft tissue strain analysis (3D digital image correlation [DIC] technique). <h3>STUDY DESIGN/SETTING</h3> Biomechanic testing in human cadaveric spine specimens. <h3>PATIENT SAMPLE</h3> A total of 14 human cadaveric L3-S1 specimens. <h3>OUTCOME MEASURES</h3> 1. Upper adjacent segment range of motion. 2. Disc surface strain/stress. <h3>METHODS</h3> A total of 14 human cadaveric L3-S1 specimens were divided into two equal groups. L4-5 pedicle-rod fixation was performed in a different fashion in each group ie, facet joint preservation (FP) and facet joint violation (FV). The violation of the facet joint was defined by denuding the facet joint capsule and removing of the external cortical surface of the superior articular process with a 3 mm Leksell-rongeur. The entry point of these pedicle screws was located at the junction between the inferolateral aspect of the facet joint. All specimens were tested multi-directionally under pure moment loading (7.5Nm). DIC was performed with cameras positioned laterally (left side) to capture the change in principal disc strains (Pmax and Pmin) at the upper adjacent level (L3-4) under peak load. Optical motion tracking was simultaneously performed on the right side. The IVD region was divided into four similar sized quarters and included upper and lower endplates. Analysis of variance of upper adjacent level range of motion (ROM) and disc strain, normalized to intact, was performed between the groups. Statistical significant was set at P≤0.05. <h3>RESULTS</h3> Normalized ROM was significantly greater with FV than FP at upper adjacent level (L3-4) during right axial rotation (1.22 vs 0.99, 23% difference, p=0.047). Normalized IVD Pmax strains at the upper adjacent level (L3-4) were significantly greater with FV than FP in the anterior quadrant during right axial rotation (1.80 vs 0.83 (ratio to intact), 97% difference, p=0.003). However, there were no significant differences in ROM and disc Pmax or Pmin strains during flexion, extension and lateral bending. <h3>CONCLUSIONS</h3> Facet violations at the uppermost level of fusion construct during pedicle screw-rod fixation were associated with adjacent level torsional instability and the increase of IVD strain. This study suggested that the preservation of uppermost facet joint of fusion segment was helpful for alleviating adjacent segment mobility and stress concentrations of the IVD above the fusion segment. <h3>FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS</h3> This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

Facet Violation With Percutaneous Pedicle Screw Placement: Impact of 3D Navigation and Facet Orientation.

Background: The gold standard for percutaneous pedicle screw placement is 2-dimensional (2D) fluoroscopy. Data are sparse on the accuracy of 3-dimensional (3D) navigation percutaneous screw placement in minimally invasive spine procedures. Objective: We sought to compare a single surgeon's percutaneous pedicle screw placement accuracy using 2D fluoroscopy versus 3D navigation, as well as to investigate the effect of facet orientation on facet violation when using 2D fluoroscopy. Methods: We conducted a retrospective radiographic study of consecutive cohort of patients who underwent percutaneous lumbar instrumentation using either 2D fluoroscopy or 3D navigation. All procedures were performed by a single surgeon at 2 academic institutions between 2011 and 2018. Radiographic measurement of screw accuracy was assessed using a postoperative computed tomographic scan. The primary outcome was facet violation, and secondary outcomes were endplate/tip breaches, the Gertzbein-Robbins classification for cortical breaches, and the Simplified Screw Accuracy grade. Statistical comparisons were made between screws placed using 2D fluoroscopy versus 3D navigation. Axial facet angles were also measured to correlate with facet violation rates. Results: In the 138 patients included, 376 screws were placed with fluoroscopy and 193 with navigation. Superior (unfused) level facet violation was higher with 2D fluoroscopy than with 3D navigation (9% vs 0.5%), which comprises the main cause for poor screw placement. Axial facet angles exceeding 45° at L4 and 60° at L5 were correlated with facet violations. Conclusion: This retrospective study found that 3D navigation is associated with lower facet violation rates in percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement when compared with 2D fluoroscopy. These findings suggest that 3D navigation may be of particular value when facet joints are coronally oriented.

The Relationship between Adjacent Segment Pathology and Facet Joint Violation by Pedicle Screw after Posterior Lumbar Instrumentation Surgery.

Transpedicular screw instrumentation systems have been increasingly utilized during the fusion of lumbar spine procedures. The superior segment facet joint violation of the pedicle screw is thought to have potential for accelerating symptomatic adjacent-segment pathology (ASP). The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between the superior segment facet joint violation by transpedicular screws and the development of ASP. Among all patients who underwent operations involving one- or two-level posterior lumbar arthrodesis at the Chonnam National University Hospital from 1992 to 2012, 87 patients were selected for this study. Fifty-six patients were included in the ASP group, and 31 were included in the non-ASP group. We used lumbar three-dimensional computed tomography (CT) to assess the violation of the superior facet joint by a transpedicular screw. The assessment is presented in scores ranging from zero to two, with zero indicating no violation (type I); one point indicating suspected violation (type II); and two points indicating definitely facet joint violation (type III). Facet violation was reported in 31 patients in the ASP group (n = 56), and in 13 patients in the non-ASP group (n = 31). The types of facet joint violation according to our scoring system were as follows: type I, 59 screws (52.7%); type II, 26 screws (23.2%); and type III, 27 screws (24.1%) in the ASP group; and type I, 43 screws (69.4%), type II, 14 screws (22.6 %); and type III, 5 screws (8.0%) in the non-ASP group. The score of facet joint violation in each patient according to our scoring system were as follows: 0 points, 25 patients (44.6%); 1 point, 8 patients (14.3%); 2 points, 4 patients (7.1%); 3 points, 11 patients (19.7%); 4 points, 8 patients (14.3%) in the ASP group; and 0 points, 18 patients (58.1%); 1 point, 4 patients (12.9%); 2 points, 7 patients (22.6%); 3 points, 2 patients (6.4%); 4 points, 0 patients (0%) in the non-ASP group. The mean scores were 1.4 points in the ASP group and 0.8 points in the non-ASP group (p < 0.05). We conclude that the position of the pedicle screw farther away from the facet joint surface can reduce the degeneration of the superior adjacent segment. Therefore, close attention to the screw position during surgery may reduce the rate of superior adjacent-segment pathologies.

A Retrospective Analysis of Superior Facet Joint Violation Between Open and Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and its Relation to Adjacent Segment Disease.

A retrospective study. The aim was to analyze the superior facet joint violation (SFV) between open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (open-TLIF) and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (MIS-TLIF) and its effect on the superior and inferior adjacent segment disc height, segmental lordosis, lumbar lordosis, and facet joint degeneration. We compared SFV between open-TLIF and MIS-TLIF and its correlation with different factors as well as its effect on adjacent segment disease. We retrospectively studied data of patients undergoing single level TLIF surgery from January 2013 to February 2016 in single institutional hospital. Axial and coronal postoperative computed tomography scan images were used to analyze SFV. In secondary analysis patients were divided into nonfacet violation group (NSFVG) and facet violation group (SFVG) and compared the changes on the superior and inferior adjacent level disc height, segmental lordosis, lumbar lordosis, and facet joint degeneration. Mean SFV grade was significantly greater in MIS-TLIF compared with open-TLIF (odds ratio: 0.638, confidence interval: 0.431-0.944; P=0.025). There was more grade 2 (10.71% vs. 5.60%) and grade 3 (4.46% vs. 1.29%) SFV in MIS-TLIF. Patient with age below 60 and body mass index (BMI) >30 kg/m2 in MIS-TLIF were more prone to high-grade SFV compared with open-TLIF. Further, logistic regression showed patients with BMI ≥30 kg/m2 has 7.137 increased odds of high-grade SFV (95% confidence interval: 3.261-15.618; P=0.000) compared with patients with BMI <30 kg/m2. Compared with NSFVG, SFVG has more SFV (0.096±0.244 vs. 0.177±0.317; P=0.012) and less improvement in lumbar visual analog scale scores -0.65±0.073 versus -0.67±0.074 (P=0.006). MIS-TLIF has more high-grade SFV as well as overall mean SFV in comparison to open-TLIF with BMI >30 kg/m2 and location of pedicle screw as an independent risk factor for SFV and risk of adjacent segment disease increases with SFV. Level III.

Robot-assisted technique vs conventional freehand technique in spine surgery: A meta-analysis.

The impact of robot-assisted techniques versus conventional freehand techniques in terms of the accuracy of pedicle screw placement remains conflicting. This meta-analysis was performed to evaluate this relationship. A systematic literature search up to July 2020 was performed and 15 studies were detected with 6041 pedicle screw placements with 2748 of them were using robot-assisted techniques and 3293 were conventional freehand techniques. They reported relationships between robot-assisted techniques and conventional freehand techniques in pedicle screw placement. Odds ratio (OR) or Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated comparing the robot-assisted techniques to conventional freehand techniques in pedicle screw placement risks using the dichotomous and continuous method with a random or fixed-effect model. Robot-assisted techniques had a significantly higher screw position grade A in Gertzbein-Robbins classification of the screw placement accuracy (OR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.66-3.54, P<.001); shorter postoperative stay (MD, -0.67; 95% CI, -1.16 to -0.19, P<.001); lower intraoperative blood loss (MD, -91.64; 95% CI, -152.44 to -30.83, P=.003); fewer intraoperative radiation dose (MD, -23.52; 95% CI, -40.12 to -6.0.93, P=.005); and low proximal facet violations (MD, 0.08; 95% CI, 0.03-0.20, P<.001) compared with conventional freehand techniques. However, no significant difference was found between robot-assisted techniques and conventional freehand techniques in surgical time (OR, 11.71; 95% CI, 03.27-26.70, P=.13); visual analogue scale scores (MD, -0.15; 95% CI, -0.54 to 0.23, P=.44); and Oswestry disability index scores (MD, 0.21; 95% CI, -5.09-5.51, P=.94). The extent of the improvement with robot-assisted techniques in screw position grade A in Gertzbein-Robbins classification of the screw placement accuracy, postoperative stay, intraoperative blood loss, intraoperative radiation dose, and proximal facet violations was significantly better than conventional freehand techniques. This relationship forces us to recommend robot-assisted techniques for pedicle screw placement to avoid any possible negative postoperative results.

Feasibility of Posterior Cervical Foraminotomy for Adjacent Segmental Disease after Anterior Cervical Fusion.

ObjectiveThe aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility of posterior cervical foraminotomy (PCF) for adjacent segmental disease (ASD) after anterior cervical fusion (ACF). As ACF is accepted as the standard treatment for cervical spondylosis, many studies have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy of various surgical techniques to overcome symptomatic ASD after the previous surgery. Herein, PCF was performed for the treatment of symptomatic ASD and the feasibility of the surgery was evaluated. MethodsForty nine patients who underwent PCF due to symptomatic ASD from August 2008 to November 2017 were identified. For demographic and perioperative data, the sex, age, types of previous surgery, ASD levels, operation times, and bleeding amount were recorded. The clinical outcome was assessed using the visual analogue scale for the neck and arm, the modified Odom’s criteria as well as neck disability index. Radiologic evaluations were performed by measuring disc softness, disc height, the cervical 2–7 sagittal vertical axis, cervical cobb angle, and facet violation. ResultsThirty-seven patients were enrolled in this study. The patients were divided into two groups based on the location of the pathology; paracentral (group P) or foramina (group F). Both groups showed significant clinical improvement (p<0.05). The proportion of calcified disc and facet violations was significantly larger in group F (p<0.05). The minimal disc height decrease with mild improvement on sagittal alignment and cervical lordosis was radiologically measured without statistical significance in both groups (p>0.05). ConclusionPCF showed satisfactory clinical and radiologic outcomes for both paracentral and foraminal pathologies of ASD after ACF. Complications related to anterior revision were also avoided. PCF can be considered a feasible and safe surgical option for ASD after ACF.

Accuracy of fluoroscopic guidance with the coaxial view of the pedicle for percutaneous insertion of lumbar pedicle screws and risk factors for pedicle breach.

In this study the authors aimed to evaluate the rate of malposition, including pedicle breach and superior facet violation, after percutaneous insertion of pedicle screws using the coaxial fluoroscopic view of the pedicle, and to assess the risk factors for pedicle breach. In total, 394 percutaneous screws placed in 85 patients using the coaxial fluoroscopic view of the pedicle between January 2014 and September 2017 were assessed, and 445 pedicle screws inserted in 116 patients using conventional open procedures were used for reference. Pedicle breach and superior facet violation were evaluated by postoperative 0.4-mm slice CT. Superior facet violation was observed in 0.5% of the percutaneous screws and 1.8% of the conventionally inserted screws. Pedicle breach occurred more frequently with percutaneous screws (28.9%) than with conventionally inserted screws (11.9%). The breaches in percutaneous screws were minor and did not reduce the interbody fusion rate. The angle difference between the percutaneous and conventionally inserted screws was comparable. Insertion at the L3 or L4 level, right-sided insertion, placement around a trefoil canal, smaller pedicle angle, and a small difference between the screw and pedicle diameters were found to be risk factors for pedicle breach by percutaneous pedicle screws. Percutaneous pedicle screw placement using the coaxial fluoroscopic view of the pedicle carries a low risk of superior facet violation. The screws should be placed carefully considering the level and side of insertion, canal shape, and pedicle angle.