Eye Irritation Potential Of Chemicals Research Articles

A simplified index to quantify the irritation/corrosion potential of chemicals – Part II: Eye

Eye irritation is a key human health endpoint assessed by in vitro and in vivo methods. One of the commonly used scoring methods to quantify the eye irritation potential of chemicals is the Modified Maximum Average Score (MMAS). It is dependent on the eye irritation effects (e.g. corneal opacity) originally proposed by Draize and then partially adopted by the OECD TG 405. These scores are not always fully reported in regulatory dossiers and lead to several drawbacks, 1) the difficulty to translate MMAS into a classification within the existing EU CLP/UN GHS criteria, 2) the absence of corrosion (serious eye damage), and 3) the dependency on input parameters which are usually not required under the OECD TGs (e.g. eye surface area). This study determined if classification can be driven by a maximum of two observed effects thereby simplifying the scoring calculation. The Simplified Irritation Index (SIIEYE), based only on corneal opacity and conjunctival redness, was developed using validated studies representing multiple chemical groups. A correlation was observed between the MMAS and the SIIEYE allowing harmonisation of the classification for the existing data. This index proved to be useful in the development of in silico model.

Expansion of the applicability domain for highly volatile substances on the Short Time Exposure test method and the predictive performance in assessing eye irritation potential.

The Short Time Exposure (STE) test method is an in vitro method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals and is used to classify the Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS) Category 1 and No Category (NC). The method has been adopted by the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) as test guideline (TG) 491 since 2015. While this method can be used to classify GHS NC, it is not suitable for testing highly volatile substances and solids other than surfactants. Here we evaluated highly volatile substances to expand the applicability domain. According to TG 491, acetone, ethanol, iso-propanol, and methyl acetate as highly volatile substances resulted in false negatives. Saline was selected as a solvent of these false negatives. In this study, mineral oil was used as the solvent, because these false negatives were amphiphilic. Based on this change, four highly volatile substances were correctly evaluated. The predictive performance for classifying GHS NC was then verified using a substance dataset constructed in reference to the Draize eye test Reference Database and STE Summary Review Document. The accuracy and false-negative rate were 86.6% (194/224) and 3.8% (3/80), respectively. Collectively, the applicability domain was expanded by changing the solvent to mineral oil for highly volatile substances, and the predictive performance for the new applicability domain including highly volatile substances was excellent. The STE test method is suitable to classify GHS NC, indicating its applicability as a test method in a bottom-up approach.

Comparative analysis of respiratory, skin and eye irritation potential of chemicals using Japanese GHS classification

Comparative analysis of respiratory, skin and eye irritation potential of chemicals using Japanese GHS classification

Assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals: A comparison study between two test methods based on human 3D hemi-cornea models

We have recently developed two hemi-cornea models (Bartok et al., Toxicol in Vitro 29, 72, 2015; Zorn-Kruppa et al. PLoS One 9, e114181, 2014), which allow the correct prediction of eye irritation potential of chemicals according to the United Nations globally harmonized system of classification and labeling of chemicals (UN GHS). Both models comprise a multilayered epithelium and a stroma with embedded keratocytes in a collagenous matrix. These two models were compared, using a set of fourteen test chemicals. Their effects after 10 and 60minutes (min) exposure were assessed from the quantification of cell viability using the MTT reduction assay. The first approach separately quantifies the damage inflicted to the epithelium and the stroma. The second approach quantifies the depth of injury by recording cell death as a function of depth. The classification obtained by the two models was compared to the Draize rabbit eye test and an ex vivo model using rabbit cornea (Jester et al. Toxicol in Vitro. 24, 597–604, 2010). With a 60min exposure, both of our models are able to clearly differentiate UN GHS Category 1 and UN GHS Category 2 test chemicals.

Quantification of contributions of molecular fragments for eye irritation of organic chemicals using QSAR study

The eye irritation potential of chemicals has largely been evaluated using the Draize rabbit-eye test for a very long time. The Draize eye-irritation data on 38 compounds established by the European Center for Ecotoxicology and Toxicology of Chemicals (ECETOC) has been used in the present quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) analysis in order to predict molar-adjusted eye scores (MES) and determine possible structural requisites and attributes that are primarily responsible for the eye irritation caused by the studied solutes. The developed model was rigorously validated internally as well as externally by applying principles of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). The test for applicability domain was also carried out in order to check the reliability of the predictions. Important fragments contributing to higher MES values of the solutes were identified through critical analysis and interpretation of the developed model. Considering all the identified structural attributes, one can choose or design safe solutes with low eye irritant properties. The presented approach suggests a model for use in the context of virtual screening of relevant solute libraries. The developed QSAR model can be used to predict existing as well as future chemicals falling within the applicability domain of the model in order to reduce the use of animals.

Two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining several alternatives for identification of eye irritation potential of chemicals including insoluble or volatile substances

For the assessment of eye irritation, one alternative test may not completely replace the rabbit Draize test. In the present study, we examined the predictive potential of a tiered approach analyzing the results from several alternatives (i.e., the Short Time Exposure (STE) test, the EpiOcular assay, the Hen’s Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay and the Bovine Corneal Opacity and Permeability (BCOP) assay) for assessing Globally Harmonized System (GHS) eye irritation categories. Fifty-six chemicals including alcohols, surfactants, and esters were selected with a balanced GHS category and a wide range of chemical classes. From a standpoint of both assessable sample numbers and predictive accuracy, the more favorable tiered approach was considered to be the two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining the STE test, the EpiOcular assay followed by the BCOP assay (accuracy 69.6%, under prediction rate 8.9%). Moreover, a more favorable predictive capacity (accuracy 71.4%, under prediction rate 3.6%) was obtained when high volatile alcohols/esters with vapor pressures >6 kilopascal (kPa) at 25°C were evaluated with EpiOcular assay instead of the STE test. From these results, the two-stage bottom-up tiered approach combining the STE test, the EpiOcular assay followed by the BCOP assay might be a promising method for the classification of GHS eye irritation category (Not classified (NC), Category 2 (Cat. 2), and Category 1 (Cat. 1)) for a wide range of test chemicals regardless of solubility.

A new cell-based method for assessing the eye irritation potential of chemicals: An alternative to the Draize test

Using a human corneal cell line (HCE-T cells) and 2 evaluation criteria, we developed a new alternative method to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals. We exposed HCE-T cells to different concentrations of 38 chemicals for 1h and measured relative cell viability (RCV) as an endpoint at each concentration. Using the RCV values, we calculated the RCV50. We also exposed HCE-T cells to 3 fixed concentrations of the 38 chemicals (5%, 0.5%, and 0.05%) for 1h and measured the RCV at each concentration. Using the RCV values at 5%, 0.5%, and 0.05%, we developed a new criterion for eye irritation potential (total eye irritation score, TEIS) and estimated the ocular irritancy. We then assessed the correlation of the results of RCV50 and TEIS with those of the Draize rabbit eye irritation. Both the RCV50 and TEIS results exhibited good positive correlations (sensitivity: 80.77%, specificity: 83.33%, and accuracy: 81.58% for TEIS; sensitivity: 73.08–76.92%, specificity: 75.00%, and accuracy: 73.68–76.32% for RCV50). We conclude that the new in vitro model using HCE-T cells is a good alternative evaluation model for the prediction of the eye irritation potential of chemicals.

A tiered approach combining the short time exposure (STE) test and the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals

For the evaluation of eye irritation, one in vitro alternative test may not completely replace the Draize test. Therefore, a tiered approach combining several in vitro assays, including cytotoxicity assays, is proposed in order to estimate the eye irritation potential of a wide range of chemical classes. The Short Time Exposure (STE) test, a relatively newer alternative eye irritation test, involves exposing Statens seruminstitut rabbit cornea (SIRC) cells for 5 min to two concentrations (5% and 0.05%) of test material. In the present study, we examined the predictive capacity of a tiered approach analyzing the results from the STE test and then the results of the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay for assessing globally harmonized system (GHS) eye irritation rankings of various chemicals. The accuracy of predicting the GHS rankings was slightly improved when the tiered approach combination of STE test and BCOP assay was used compared to when the STE test irritation rank classification was used alone. Moreover, the under prediction rate was substantially improved when this tiered approach was used. From these results, the tiered approach of combining the data analysis of the STE test and BCOP assay might be a promising alternative eye irritation test strategy.

Validation study of the Short Time Exposure (STE) test to assess the eye irritation potential of chemicals

Short Time Exposure (STE) test is a cytotoxicity test in SIRC cells (rabbit corneal cell line) that assesses eye irritation potential following a 5-min chemical exposure. This validation study assessed transferability, intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility, and predictive capacity of STE test in five laboratories (supported by Japanese Society for Alternatives to Animal Experiments). Sodium lauryl sulfate, calcium thioglycolate, and Tween 80 were evaluated, in triplicate, using 5%, 0.5%, and 0.05% concentrations in physiological saline, to confirm transferability. Good transferability was noted when similar mean relative viabilities and rank classifications were obtained in all five laboratories and were comparable to data from test method developing laboratory. Good intra- and inter-laboratory reproducibility was obtained with four assay controls (three solvents and one positive control), and four assay controls and 25 chemicals, respectively. STE irritation category based on relative viability of a 5% solution of 25 blinded test chemicals showed good correlation with Globally Harmonized System (GHS) categories (NI; I: Cat. 1 and 2). The STE prediction model, using relative viability of the 5% and 0.05% solutions, provided an irritation rank (1, 2, or 3) that had a good correlation (above 80%), or predictive capacity, with GHS irritation ranks in all laboratories. Based on these findings, the STE test is a promising alternative eye irritation test that could be easily standardized.

Combined In Vitro Tests as an Alternative to In Vivo Eye Irritation Tests

Accurate methods that test the eye irritation potential of chemicals, which do not involve the use of animals, are needed to meet new regulatory standards. We evaluated the applicability and predictive capacity of five in vitro tests for eye irritation: the Hen's Egg Test-Chorioallantoic Membrane (HET-CAM) assay; the Chorioallantoic Membrane-Trypan Blue Staining (CAM-TBS) assay; the Fluorescein Leakage Test (FLT); the 3T3-Neutral Red Uptake (3T3-NRU) cytotoxicity assay; and the red blood cell (RBC) haemolysis assay. A panel of 16 chemicals (some at multiple concentrations) was assessed by using the five tests, and the results were compared with historical in vivo Draize test data. The results showed rank correlation and class concordance between the five alternative methods and the Draize test for the 16 chemicals. These in vitro assays had good predictive capacity, reproducibility and reliability when compared to the Draize test. The best relationship was between the HET-CAM, CAM-TBS and FLT results, and the modified maximum average score(s) (MMAS). A prediction model (PM) was developed, based on the maximum possible correlation between the MMAS and the HET-CAM, CAM-TBS and FLT results. The PM had a good predictive capacity when compared to the results of animal tests, indicating its potential value for the in vitro screening of chemicals for eye irritation effects.

A new alternative method to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals by using HCE-T cell

A new alternative method to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals by using HCE-T cell

In Vitro Eye Irritancy Test of Polyoxyethylene Alkyl Derivatives Using a Reconstructed Rabbit Corneal Epithelium Model

We have developed the Rabbit Corneal Epithelial (RCE) Model to evaluate the in vitro eye irritation potential of chemicals including pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and their raw ingredients. In the model, a stratified culture of rabbit corneal epithelial cells is grown at the air-liquid interface on an amnion acting as a parabasal membrane. The alkaline exposure was restored each day in the presence of no irritants, although with the addition of sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS), which is a major irritant, the restoration of deficit was inhibited on the RCE model in a dose-dependent manner. The results of this test were comparable with those of the Draize test, and thus, this method using the RCE model may prove to be a useful and sensitive in vitro eye irritation test. The in vitro eye irritation potential of polyoxyethylene alkyl derivatives, polyoxyethylene lauryl ether (PLE), polyoxyethylene cetyl ether (PCE), polyoxyethylene stearyl ether (PSE), polyoxyethylene oleyl ether (POE), and polyoxyethylene behenyl ether (PBE) were evaluated using the RCE model containing an alkaline exposure. POE inhibited 90.2% of the restoration of deficit at a concentration of 0.5% on the 4th day after addition. Depending on the structure, an activity relationship was defined. The polyoxyethylene alkyl derivatives had distinctly different inhibitory potencies against the restoration of deficit, according to their substitution patterns. POE inhibited the restoration of deficit greater than other polyoxyethylene alkyl derivatives on the RCE model. These results indicated that the oleyl chain of POE is an important factor for inhibiting the restoration of deficit on the RCE model.

Inter-laboratory study of short time exposure (STE) test for predicting eye irritation potential of chemicals and correspondence to globally harmonized system (GHS) classification

Short time exposure (STE) test using rabbit corneal cell line (SIRC) cells was developed as an alternative eye irritation test. STE test uses relative viability as the endpoint after cells are exposed to the test material at constant concentrations for 5 min. In this inter-laboratory study with 3 laboratories, 44 chemicals with a wide range of classes were evaluated for the transferability, between-lab reproducibility and predictive capacity of the STE test as an alternative eye irritation test. Globally harmonized system (GHS) classification based on Draize eye irritation test data was used as the comparative in vivo data. Transferability was assessed using standard chemicals (sodium lauryl sulfate, calcium thioglycolate, and Tween 80) and the coefficient variations (CVs) of relative viabilities between 3 labs were less than 0.13. The irritation category (Irritant or Non irritant) at each test concentration (5% and 0.05%) in STE test was the same in 3 laboratories for all 44 tested chemicals. The predictive capacity irritation category classification between STE test and GHS were compared, and a good correlation was confirmed (accuracy was 90.9% at all laboratories). In addition, the STE rankings of 1, 2, and 3 classified by the prediction model (PM) based on the relative viability at two concentrations (5% and 0.05%) were highly correlated with the GHS ranks of non-irritant, category 1, and category 2, respectively (accuracy was 75.0% at all laboratories). These results suggest that the STE test possessed easy transferability, reproducibility, good predictive performance.

Development of the short time exposure (STE) test: An in vitro eye irritation test using SIRC cells

Using SIRC (rabbit corneal cell line) cells, we developed an alternative eye irritation test: the short time exposure (STE) test. This STE test is a cytotoxicity test using physiological saline or mineral oil as the test solvent. Evaluation exposure time is short (5min), which is similar to actual exposure situations, and uses the cell viability (CV) at a constant concentration as the endpoint for irritation potential. First, in order to confirm the usefulness of this STE test in assessing eye irritation potential of chemicals, 51 raw materials were tested and the correlation between CV in the STE test and the eye irritation score in the Draize test was examined. For the undiluted raw materials tested in the Draize test, the 5% test concentration in the STE test gave irritation classes that correlated well with the irritation classes from the Draize test (accuracy: 89.6%). For those materials tested as a 10% solution in the Draize test, STE irritation classes with 0.05% test concentration corresponded well with the Draize irritation classes (accuracy: 80.0%). Next, using the cell viabilities at these two concentrations, the STE prediction model (PM) was developed. A score of 1 or 2 was given for the results from each tested concentration in the STE test and Draize test. The scores from each test were then summed to yield a 3-level (Rank 1: minimally irritant, Rank 2: moderate irritant, Rank 3: severe irritant) eye irritation potential classification. Rank classification in the STE test showed a good correlation mostly to that in the Draize test (irritation class correspondence rate: 70.2%, but after exclusion of data of alcoholic materials, the rate was 91.7%). In most cytotoxicity test, the cytotoxicity of acids and amines is generally underestimated due the use of medium as the solvent. This is the result of the buffering capacity of the media. On the other hand, the STE test could predict the eye irritation potential by evaluating the chemical with a 5% test concentration. Eleven water insoluble materials such as toluene, octanol, and hexanol could be evaluated by using mineral oil as test solvent in the STE test.The STE test demonstrated itself to be simple, promising, have great potential, be of value, and to be an easily standardized alternative eye irritation test.

Reconstituted human corneal epithelium: A new alternative to the Draize eye test for the assessment of the eye irritation potential of chemicals and cosmetic products

The aim of this study was to evaluate the interest of a new three-dimensional epithelial model cultivated from human corneal cells to replace animal testing in the assessment of eye tolerance. To this end, 65 formulated cosmetic products and 36 chemicals were tested by means of this in vitro model using a simplified toxicokinetic approach. The chemicals were selected from the ECETOC data bank and the EC/HO International validation study list. Very satisfactory results were obtained in terms of concordance with the Draize test data for the formulated cosmetic products. Moreover, the response of the corneal model appeared predictive of human ocular response clinically observed by ophthalmologists. The in vitro scores for the chemicals tested strongly correlated with their respective scores in vivo. For all the compounds tested, the response of the corneal model to irritants was similar regardless of their chemical structure, suggesting a good robustness of the prediction model proposed. We concluded that this new three-dimensional epithelial model, developed from human corneal cells, could be promising for the prediction of eye irritation induced by chemicals and complex formulated products, and that these two types of materials should be tested using a similar protocol. A simple shortening of the exposure period was required for the chemicals assumed to be more aggressively irritant to the epithelial tissues than the cosmetic formulae.

Refinement of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test as an alternative screening test for eye irritation

The objective of this study was to limit the test procedure time of the Slug Mucosal Irritation test to one day and to determine whether it is a relevant and reliable method to predict the eye irritation potential of chemicals. The irritation potential of several eye reference chemicals can be estimated by the amount of mucus produced when tested at a 1% concentration (60 min). Since some in vivo irritating chemicals did not influence this endpoint the effect of increasing concentrations on membrane damage was investigated. This study revealed that when tested at a 3.5% concentration (60 min) the underestimated chemicals induced an increased protein and/or enzyme release. A two-step classification prediction model was developed that classified the chemicals first by the amount of mucus produced (1%, 60 min). Chemicals that did not affect this endpoint were classified based on the membrane damage induced by a second treatment (3.5%, 60 min). The results were compared with the corresponding EU classification (NI, R36 and R41) and 71% of the chemicals were correctly classified with a specificity and sensitivity of 75% and 94%, respectively. Repeated testing of the chemicals revealed a good intra-laboratory reproducibility. The test seems to be a promising method for screening the eye irritating potential of chemicals.

An eye irritation test protocol and an evaluation and classification system

An in vivo test protocol and an evaluation and classification system for the determination of eye irritation potential of chemicals and mixtures (substances) is proposed. The protocol uses two or three rabbits and reduces distress in test animals. The test substances are classified as non-irritant, irritant or severe irritant to meet regulatory needs. They may be classified on the basis of past experience with similar compounds or mixtures. Screens such as structure-activity relationships, pH extremes, validated and accepted in vitro tests, severe dermal irritation (primary dermal irritation index ⩾ 5) or severe dermal toxicity (lethality at <200 mg/kg body weight) should be used to classify irritant or severe irritant materials when one or more of the screens can provide convincing evidence. For suspected severe irritant materials, the proposed in vivo test permits the use of one rabbit and instillation of 0.01 ml (0.01 g) of the test material into the cornea. Materials that are not classified irritant or severe irritant by screens or severe irritant by one rabbit test are tested in two or three rabbits; 0.1 ml (0.1 g) is instilled into the conjunctival sac. The responses (corneal opacity, iritis and conjunctival redness) are scored according to the modified Draize scoring system at 24, 48 and 72 hr and 7 days post-instillation. A rabbit is considered positive when corneal opacity of 1 or above, iritis of 1 or above or conjunctival redness of 2 or above is present at 24, 48 or 72 hr post-instillation. The material is classified as a severe irritant when the rabbit in the one-animal test or two or more rabbits in the standard test have responses of corneal opacity of 3 or above and iritis of 2 at 24, 48 or 72 hr, or positive responses on day 7 after instillation. The material is classified as an eye irritant when two or more rabbits are positive but the responses are not severe and they clear 7 days after instillation. The material is classified as a non-irritant when no more than one rabbit is positive. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of US Federal agencies.

Studies on eye irritation caused by chemicals in rabbits. III. An in vitro testing method using rat red blood cells for the prediction of eye irritation potential of chemicals.

Rat red blood cells were used as an in vitro method to evaluate the eye irritation potential of chemicals in rabbits. The results using 116 chemicals of various categories including medicines, pesticides, detergents and solvents were analyzed for the prediction of possibility of eye irritation potentials. Eye irritation of chemicals was examined according to Draize method and chemicals were classified into three categories, (1) non or mild irritants, (2) moderate or severe irritants and (3) strong or corrosive irritants, based on the recovery of damages. The in vitro method consisted of two methods detecting the effects of chemicals mainly on protein and lipid in the membrane, which were evaluated by the induction of methemoglobin and hemolysis, respectively. Non- or mild irritants induced neither methemoglobin formation nor hemolysis. Most of moderate or severe irritants induced hemolysis, however, the potentials were low. Strong or corrosive irritants had high potentials for the induction of methemoglobin. The multivariate estimation by the above two in vitro data sets were 77.6% predictive of the in vivo classification.