Extremity Motor Function In Patients Research Articles

Accumulative Assessment of Upper Extremity.

The Fugl-Meyer assessment for upper extremity (FMA-UE) is a measure for assessing upper extremity motor function in patients with stroke. However, the considerable administration time of the assessment decreases its feasibility. This study aimed to develop an accumulative assessment system of upper extremity motor function (AAS-UE) based on the FMA-UE to improve administrative efficiency while retaining sufficient psychometric properties. The study used secondary data from 3 previous studies having FMA-UE datasets, including 2 follow-up studies for subacute stroke individuals and 1 test-retest study for individuals with chronic stroke. The AAS-UE adopted deep learning algorithms to use patients' prior information (ie, the FMA-UE scores in previous assessments, time interval of adjacent assessments, and chronicity of stroke) to select a short and personalized item set for the following assessment items and reproduce their FMA-UE scores. Our data included a total of 682 patients after stroke. The AAS-UE administered 10 different items for each patient. The AAS-UE demonstrated good concurrent validity (r = 0.97-0.99 with the FMA-UE), high test-retest reliability (intra-class correlation coefficient = 0.96), low random measurement error (percentage of minimal detectable change = 15.6%), good group-level responsiveness (standardized response mean = 0.65-1.07), and good individual-level responsiveness (30.5%-53.2% of patients showed significant improvement). These psychometric properties were comparable to those of the FMA-UE. The AAS-UE uses an innovative assessment method which makes good use of patients' prior information to achieve administrative efficiency with good psychometric properties. This study demonstrates a new assessment method to improve administrative efficiency while retaining psychometric properties, especially individual-level responsiveness and random measurement error, by making good use of patients' basic information and medical records.

Effects of early mobilization within 48 hours of injury in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury

Objective To investigate the effects of early mobilization within 48 h of injury on motor function and walking ability in patients with incomplete cervical spinal cord injury (SCI). Design A retrospective observational study. Setting Intensive care unit or high care unit of a university hospital emergency center. Participants Of 224 patients with SCI having American Spinal Injury Association impairment scale grades C and D, 158 consecutive patients hospitalized for at least 3 weeks after injury were included. Interventions Patients were categorized into two groups: an early mobilization group in which patients were mobilized within 48 h of injury and a delayed mobilization group in which they were mobilized after 48 h of injury. Outcome measures The upper extremity motor score (UEMS), lower extremity motor score (LEMS), and Walking Index for Spinal Cord Injury II (WISCI II) were compared using propensity score matching analysis. Results Of the 158 patients who met the eligibility criteria, 32 were matched between the groups. There was a significant difference in the change in LEMS from the initial assessment to the assessment 2 weeks postoperatively in the early mobilization group (median 9 points vs. 3 points, p < 0.05). There were no significant differences in UEMS or WISCI II. Conclusion Early mobilization within 48 h may improve lower extremity motor function in patients with acute incomplete cervical SCI.

The relationship between the functional status of upper extremity motor neurons and motor function and prognosis in stroke patients.

This study investigates the correlation between neuroelectrop-hysiological assessments such as motor unit number estimation (MUNE) and F-waves with upper extremity motor function and one-year prognosis in stroke patients. Neuroelectrophysiological assessments of the abductor pollicis brevis muscle, including MUNE and F-waves, were conducted. Upper extremity motor function was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS). Pearson correlation and multiple linear regression analyses were performed to explore the relationship between upper extremity motor function and variables such as MUNE and F-waves. ROC curve analysis assessed the predictive ability of MUNE and F-waves for upper extremity motor function, and binary logistic regression analysis examined factors related to motor function improvement 1 year post-discharge. A total of 130 patients were ultimately included. Significant differences in MUNE and occupancy rate of non-repeater F-waves (non-ORF) were found between hemiplegic and unaffected sides (p < 0.001), with a significant difference in F-wave mean latency (p < 0.05). Pearson correlation analysis showed a positive correlation between FMA-UE at admission and hemiplegic side's MUNE and non-ORF (p < 0.001). Multiple linear regression indicated that hemiplegic side's MUNE (β = 0.88, p < 0.001) and non-ORF (β = 0.275, p = 0.005) influenced FMA-UE. ROC analysis demonstrated higher predictive ability for hemiplegic side's MUNE (AUC = 0.696, p < 0.001) than non-ORF (AUC = 0.622, p = 0.018). Binary logistic regression showed that hemiplegic side's MUNE was associated with FMA-UE improvement 1 year post-discharge. MUNE and F-waves are correlated with upper extremity motor function in patients, reflecting their motor function status. These indicators have good predictive value for motor function and are associated with the prognosis of upper extremity motor function to a certain extent.

Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation on motor function in patients with spinal cord injury: A meta-analysis.

It has been suggested that transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is effective in the rehabilitation of patients with spinal cord injury (SCI). However, the evidence is mainly based on case reports. To summarize the influence of transcutaneous SCS on extremity motor function of patients with SCI in a meta-analysis. A systematic literature search was performed in electronic databases including PubMed, Cochrane library, Embase, Web of Science, Wanfang, and CNKI to obtain relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A random-effects model was used to pool the results by incorporating the impact of the potential heterogeneity. The most recent database search was conducted on December 31, 2023. Six small-scale open-label or single-blind RCTs were included. Transcutaneous SCS on the basis of conventional rehabilitation could significantly improve limb strength (mean difference: 4.82, p = 0.004; I2 = 0%) and attenuate spasticity (MD: -0.40, p = 0.02; I2 = 0%). The upper-extremity motor function was not significantly affected (p = 0.75). However, transcutaneous SCS significantly improved mobility as indicated by walking speed (MD: 0.13 m/s, p = 0.009; I2 = 0%) and walking distance (standardized MD: 0.62, I2 = 0%). Transcutaneous SCS is effective in improving limb strength, spasticity and mobility of patients with SCI.

Efficacy and safety of vagus nerve stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with stroke: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

In 2021, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved paired vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) for patients with moderate-to-severe upper extremity motor impairments following chronic ischemic stroke. Previous meta-analyses have shown that VNS may impact stroke rehabilitation, but each has some limitations. PubMed, Ovid, Cochrane Library, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and WHO ICTRP databases were searched until July 14, 2022 for randomized controlled trials (RCTs). We defined primary outcomes as Fugl-Meyer Assessment for Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Wolf Motor Function Test (WMFT). Subgroup analyses included types of VNS, time since onset and long-term effects. Secondary outcomes included adverse events of VNS. Eight RCTs involving 266 patients were analyzed, of which five used direct VNS and three transcutaneous auricular VNS. The results revealed that VNS enhanced upper extremity function via FMA-UE (SMD = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.48 to 0.99; P < 0.00001) and WMFT (SMD = 0.82; 95% CI:0.52 to 1.13; P < 0.00001) in comparison to the control group, but showed no significant change on long-term effects of FMA-UE (SMD = 0.69; 95% CI: - 0.06 to 1.44; P = 0.07). There was no difference in adverse events between the VNS and control groups (RR = 1.16; 95% CI: 0.46 to 2.92; P = 0.74). For stroke victims with upper limb disabilities, VNS paired with rehabilitation was significantly safe and effective. More high-quality multicentric RCTs are needed to validate this conclusion.

Protocol for a single-blind randomized clinical trial to test the efficacy of bilateral transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients recovering from stroke

BackgroundNo consensus currently exists regarding the optimal protocol for repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) treatment of upper-extremity motor dysfunction after stroke. Studies have shown that combined low- and high-frequency stimulation (LF-HF-rTMS) of the bilateral cerebral hemispheres is more effective than sham stimulation or stimulation of one cerebral hemisphere alone in treating motor dysfunction in the subacute stage of stroke. The efficacy of this protocol in the convalescence phase of stroke has rarely been reported, and its mechanism of action has not been clarified. In this study, we designed a prospective, single-blind, randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy and safety of different stimulation regimens for the treatment of upper extremity motor disorders in patients with convalescent stage stroke and aimed to explore the underlying mechanisms based on biomarkers such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF).MethodsSeventy-six subjects will be randomly divided into combined, low-frequency, high-frequency, and control groups based on the proportion of 1:1:1:1, with 19 cases in each group. All groups will have conventional rehabilitation, on top of which the combined group will receive 1 Hz rTMS in the unaffected hemisphere and 10 Hz rTMS in the affected hemisphere. The low-frequency group will be administered 1 Hz rTMS in the unaffected hemisphere and sham stimulation in the contralateral hemisphere. The high-frequency group will be administered 10 Hz rTMS in the affected hemisphere and contralateral sham stimulation. The control group will receive bilateral sham stimulation. Assessments will be performed at baseline, after 2 weeks of treatment, and at post-treatment follow-up at week 6. The primary outcomes are FMA-UE (Fugl-Meyer assessment-upper extremity), latency, and serum BDNF levels. The secondary outcomes are the National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS), Brunnstrom staging (BS), modified Ashworth scale (MAS), Modified Barthel Index (MBI), central motor conduction time (CMCT), precursor proteins of mature BDNF (proBDNF), and matrix metalloproteinase-9 (MMP-9) levels. Adverse events, such as headaches and seizures, will be recorded throughout the study.DiscussionThe findings of this study will help develop optimal stimulation protocols for motor recovery in stroke patients and identify biomarkers that respond to post-stroke motor rehabilitation, for better guidance of clinical treatment.Trial registrationThe study protocol was passed by the Medical Research Ethics Committee of the General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University on January 1, 2022 (no. KYLL-2021–1082). It was registered into the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry on May 22, 2022 (no. ChiCTR2200060201). This study is currently in progress.Graphical

Effect of Body Weight Support Training on Lower Extremity Motor Function in Patients With Spinal Cord Injury: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

The aims of the study are to systematically evaluate the effect of body weight support training on lower extremity motor function(s) in patients with spinal cord injury and to compare the effect differences among three body weight support training methods. PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, Embase, CNKI, CBM, China Scientific Journal, and Wan Fang databases were searched until December 31, 2022. Meta-analysis and network meta-analysis were conducted using RevMan 5.4 and ADDIS 1.16.8. Nineteen randomized controlled trials involving 864 patients were included. The meta-analysis showed that body weight support training could improve lower extremity motor scores according to the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury standard (mean difference = 6.38, 95% confidence interval = 3.96-8.80, P < 0.05), walking speed (standard mean difference = 0.77, 95% confidence interval = 0.52-1.02, P < 0.05), and modified Barthel Index scores (mean difference = 9.85, 95% confidence interval = 8.39-11.30, P < 0.05). The network meta-analysis showed no significant difference among the three body weight support training methods for improving lower extremity motor scores in patients with spinal cord injury. The best probability ranking of the body weight support training methods for improving lower extremity motor scores in patients with spinal cord injury was robot-assisted gait training ( P = 0.60), followed by aquatic exercise ( P = 0.21) and body weight support training ( P = 0.19). Body weight support training can improve lower extremity motor score in patients with spinal cord injury. No significant difference was observed among the three body weight support training methods, but robot-assisted gait training may produce the best effect.

Effects of adding interactive videogames to conventional rehabilitation program on radiological progression and upper extremity motor function in patients with hemiplegic stroke: a preliminary study

Objectives To investigate the effects of adding interactive videogames to conventional rehabilitation programmes on radiological progression and upper extremity functional status. Patients and Methods A total of 18 patients with hemiplegic stroke were randomized into two groups as conventional rehabilitation (control) group (n = 9), and the conventional rehabilitation + interactive videogames (intervention) group (n = 9). Each group received a 4-week program (5 days/week). Radiological progression (diffuse tensor imaging), and upper extremity functional status (upper extremity motor functioning part of the Fugl Meyer Assessment, self-care part of the Functional Independence Measure (FIM), and Motor Activity Log) were assessed at baseline and 4-week later. Results While no changes were detected in radiological status in the intervention group (p > 0.05), some regions on the affected side were improved significantly in the control group (p < 0.05). Total upper extremity motor functioning part of the Fugl Meyer Assessment scores and the self-care part of the FIM scores significantly improved in both groups (p < 0.05). No differences were detected in the amount of changes between groups (p > 0.05). Conclusion According to our results, adding videogames to a conventional rehabilitation program does not seem enhancing the radiological progression or the functional status of the upper extremities.

Effect of Jin's Three-Needle Therapy Combined with Standing Digital OT Training on Upper Extremity Motor Function of Patients with Hemiplegia after Stroke

Effect of Jin's Three-Needle Therapy Combined with Standing Digital OT Training on Upper Extremity Motor Function of Patients with Hemiplegia after Stroke

Effects of Cognitive Exercise Therapy on Upper Extremity Sensorimotor Function and Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Stroke: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

This study investigated the effects of cognitive exercise therapy on upper extremity sensorimotor function and daily activity in patients with chronic stroke and compared these effects to those of conventional occupational therapy. The 30 patients with chronic stroke (mean age: 63.6 ± 12.7 years; height: 162.8 ± 8.1 cm; weight: 60.6 ± 7.6 kg; body mass index: 22.8 ± 1.9 kg/m2) were divided into two treatment groups with 15 patients in each. The respective interventions were provided for 30 min per day, five times weekly for 4 weeks. Manual and sensory function tests were conducted to evaluate the sensorimotor function, while the Korean-Modified Barthel Index was used to assess daily activities. All outcome variables were assessed before and after the interventions. A significant interaction was observed in sensory function (p = 0.001) but not motor function or daily activities (p > 0.05). No significant main group effects were found for any outcome variables (p > 0.05). The experimental group showed significant improvements in motor function (p < 0.001), sensory function (p < 0.001), and daily life activities (p = 0.001) after cognitive exercise therapy, whereas the control group showed significant improvement only in daily life activities post-intervention (p = 0.012). These results demonstrated the positive effects of cognitive exercise therapy on upper extremity sensorimotor function and daily life activities and the lack of improvement in motor and sensory function following conventional occupational therapy in patients with chronic stroke. Thus, the combination of cognitive exercise and conventional occupational therapies may be an effective way to improve sensory function and upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke.

Effectiveness of Motor Imagery Training for Lower Extremity Motor Function in Patients With Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

<h3>Objective(s)</h3> Motor imagery training (MIT) is considered an emerging and non-invasive rehabilitation technique that patients could easily master to improve functional outcomes. To evaluate the effectiveness of MIT combined with conventional rehabilitation therapy (CRT) in treatment of lower extremity motor functions (LEMFs) in patients with stroke. <h3>Data Sources</h3> PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials, Chinese Biomedical Literatures database, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wan-Fang Database, and Chinese Scientific Journals Database were researched from the earliest records to December 1, 2020. <h3>Study Selection</h3> Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared MIT associated with CRT versus a control CRT in patients with lower extremity motor dysfunction after stroke, were selected. Among the 781 records screened, 15 trials, in which motor imagination questionnaires clearly performed, were included with 761 eligible patients. <h3>Data Extraction</h3> Pooled outcome data were completed by two researchers independently. Primary evaluation index was the Fugl-Meyer assessment scale-Lower extremity (FMA-LE). The second evaluation indices were Functional Ambulation Category (FAC) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS). Meanwhile, the methodological quality of included studies was conducted via the Physiotherapy Evidence Database scale and the Cochrane risk of bias criteria tools. <h3>Data Synthesis</h3> Meta-analysis showed that there existed statistically significant improvements in FMA-LE (WMD=3.65, 95%CI=2.52, 4.78, P < 0.00001), FAC (WMD=0.80, 95% CI=0.22, 1.38, P=0.006) and BBS (WMD=6.15, 95% CI=2.98, 9.32, P=0.0001) in the MIT associated with CRT group versus the control group after an intervention of more than 3 weeks. <h3>Conclusions</h3> MIT associated with CRT had better effectiveness in LEMFs than CRT alone. <h3>Author(s) Disclosures</h3> None.

Effects of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Combined With Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Patients With Stroke.

The aim of the study was to investigate the treatment effects of transcranial direct current stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation on the motor function of upper extremity in persons with stroke. This study was a pilot double-blind randomized controlled trial. Twenty-six patients due to stroke onset of more than 6 mos were randomly allocated to three groups: transcranial direct current stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group, transcranial direct current stimulation group, or control group. In addition to conventional rehabilitation, all subjects received one of the three protocols in a total of 15 sessions for 3 wks. A significant difference among the three groups was found for the change scores of the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity subscale from pretreatment to 1-mo follow-up (P = 0.02), in favor of the transcranial direct current stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group. Moreover, the transcranial direct current stimulation combined with neuromuscular electrical stimulation group showed significant within-group improvement on the Fugl-Meyer Assessment upper extremity (from preintervention to postintervention, P = 0.01) and the Action Research Arm Test (from preintervention to postintervention and to 1-mo postintervention, P = 0.03 and P = 0.04, respectively). This preliminary study reveals that combining transcranial direct current stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation with regular rehabilitation programs may enhance better upper extremity functional improvement than regular rehabilitation programs alone in patients with chronic stroke.

Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation for lower extremity motor function in patients with stroke: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

Transcranial magnetic stimulation, a type of noninvasive brain stimulation, has become an ancillary therapy for motor function rehabilitation. Most previous studies have focused on the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on motor function in stroke patients. There have been relatively few studies on the effects of different modalities of rTMS on lower extremity motor function and corticospinal excitability in patients with stroke. The MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, ISI Science Citation Index, Physiotherapy Evidence Database, China National Knowledge Infrastructure Library, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases were searched. Parallel or crossover randomized controlled trials that addressed the effectiveness of rTMS in patients with stroke, published from inception to November 28, 2019, were included. Standard pairwise meta-analysis was conducted using R version 3.6.1 with the “meta” package. Bayesian network analysis using the Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of different rTMS protocol interventions. Network meta-analysis results of 18 randomized controlled trials regarding lower extremity motor function recovery revealed that low-frequency rTMS had better efficacy in promoting lower extremity motor function recovery than sham stimulation. Network meta-analysis results of five randomized controlled trials demonstrated that high-frequency rTMS led to higher amplitudes of motor evoked potentials than low-frequency rTMS or sham stimulation. These findings suggest that rTMS can improve motor function in patients with stroke, and that low-frequency rTMS mainly affects motor function, whereas high-frequency rTMS increases the amplitudes of motor evoked potentials. More high-quality randomized controlled trials are needed to validate this conclusion. The work was registered in PROSPERO (registration No. CRD42020147055) on April 28, 2020.

The effect of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation on upper extremity motor function in stroke patients: A meta-analytical review

Repetitive magnetic stimulation (rTMS) is a non-invasive brain stimulation technique, which can alter excitability in the motor cortex and is a potential treatment for motor impairment in stroke patients. However, the effect of rTMS on upper extremity function in stroke patients remains controversial. This study systematically reviewed and meta-analyzed the current findings on the effectiveness of rTMS for restoring upper extremity motor function in stroke patients. A comprehensive literature search up to March 2010 of PubMed, the Cochrane Library, Scirus and the Chinese Electronic Periodical Services (CEPS) was performed. The articles from these searches were used to obtain additional articles. The quality of each study was assessed by criteria suggested by Jadad and the American Academy of Neurology for grading therapeutic trials. Biostat meta-analysis software version 2.0 was used to perform meta-analysis. Nine studies were included. The overall random effects model revealed a significant positive treatment effect of rTMS when applied to primary motor cortex (M1) (Hedges' g = 0.590, 95% CI = 0.133 - 1.048, p= 0.011). In subgroup analysis, positive treatment effects were seen in acute stroke (Hedges' g = 0.91, 95% CI = 0.339 - 1.481, p = 0.002) and on the nonlesional M1 cortex (Hedges' g = 0.807, 95% CI = 0.054 - 1.560, p = 0.036). It is concluded that when applied to the nonlesional hemisphere, low frequency rTMS may improve the upper extremity motor function of patients with acute stroke.

Effects of functional electrical stimulation-cycling on shoulder pain and subluxation in patients with acute-subacute stroke: a pilot study.

Functional electrical stimulation (FES)-cycling is a technique used to provide voluntary muscle contraction during a functional task. The aims were primarily to determine the effects of FES-cycling on shoulder pain and subluxation, and secondarily to evaluate the improvement of upper extremity motor function in patients with acute-subacute stroke patient. In this prospective trial, 21 patients with acute-subacute stroke, randomly assigned into the FES-cycling group or the standard rehabilitation program (control group). Analyses of shoulder subluxation were carried out by radiography. The numeric rating scale was used to evaluate the intensity of pain, Fugl-Meyer and Frenchay arm tests for motor function, and functional independence measure for functional status. The outcome data were evaluated at baseline and at the end of 4-week treatment. Intragroup comparisons showed improvement of acromiohumeral distance, Fugl-Meyer assessment, and functional independence measure in both groups after treatment. In intergroup comparison, FES-cycling group exerted better outcomes in shoulder pain compared with the control group (P=0.015). Correlation analyses demonstrated only positive correlation between shoulder subluxation and pain (P=0.022). FES-cycling was superior to standard rehabilitation therapy for shoulder pain relief in patients with acute-subacute stroke. Therefore, combining FES-cycling with a standard rehabilitation program alleviates shoulder pain and may prevent development of shoulder subluxation over time.

Stepwise intervention for proximal and distal upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: A report of 2 cases

Upper extremity (UE) dysfunction is a common problem in patients with stroke. Recently, several neurorehabilitation approaches have been developed to improve the UE motor function (Langphorene P. Lancet Neurol , 2009). However, most approaches target either proximal or distal UE motor function, although interventions targeting both portions are necessary to restore functional UE in actual daily life. Therefore, we conducted stepwise intervention for both shoulder and finger function to improve UE motor function. Two stroke patients with severe hemiparetic stroke participated in the study. Firstly, we attempted to improve shoulder function using brain machine interface (BMI) technology for 7 days ( Fig. 1 ). After the shoulder BMI training, a combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation (MI + ES) was conducted to improve finger function for 10 days ( Fig. 2 ). Motor function of the affected UE was assessed with motor items of the Fugl–Meyer assessment UE motor score (FMA-UE). FMA-UE consists of 4 categories (A: Shoulder/Elbow/Forearm; B: Wrist; C: Hand; D: Coordination) and has a maximum score of 66. The FMA-UE score increased remarkably after the stepwise intervention (Patient A: 17→33; Patient B: 11→25). The effect of shoulder BMI training is shown in Fig. 3 . It became possible for patients to raise their arms above the shoulder position after the shoulder BMI training. Patients’ UE motor function was also further improved by the subsequent MI + ES intervention. The improvement in UE motor function with our stepwise intervention for proximal and distal motor functions greatly exceeded the minimal clinically important difference in the subjects of this study.

Effect of the combination of motor imagery and electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor function in patients with chronic stroke: preliminary results.

Background:The combination of motor imagery (MI) and afferent input with electrical stimulation (ES) enhances the excitability of the corticospinal tract compared with motor imagery alone or electrical stimulation alone. However, its therapeutic effect is unknown in patients with hemiparetic stroke. We performed a preliminary examination of the therapeutic effects of MI + ES on upper extremity (UE) motor function in patients with chronic stroke.Methods:A total of 10 patients with chronic stroke demonstrating severe hemiparesis participated. The imagined task was extension of the affected finger. Peripheral nerve electrical stimulation was applied to the radial nerve at the spiral groove. MI + ES intervention was conducted for 10 days. UE motor function as assessed with the Fugl–Meyer assessment UE motor score (FMA-UE), the amount of the affected UE use in daily life as assessed with a Motor Activity Log (MAL-AOU), and the degree of hypertonia in flexor muscles as assessed with the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) were evaluated before and after intervention. To assess the change in spinal neural circuits, reciprocal inhibition between forearm extensor and flexor muscles with the H reflex conditioning-test paradigm at interstimulus intervals (ISIs) of 0, 20, and 100 ms were measured before and after intervention.Results:UE motor function, the amount of the affected UE use, and muscle hypertonia in flexor muscles were significantly improved after MI + ES intervention (FMA-UE: p < 0.01, MAL-AOU: p < 0.01, MAS: p = 0.02). Neurophysiologically, the intervention induced restoration of reciprocal inhibition from the forearm extensor to the flexor muscles (ISI at 0 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 20 ms: p = 0.03, ISI at 100 ms: p = 0.01).Conclusion:MI + ES intervention was effective for improving UE motor function in patients with severe paralysis.

Effect of Action Observation of Meaningful Tasks on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Patients with Stroke

Effect of Action Observation of Meaningful Tasks on Upper Extremity Motor Function in Patients with Stroke

Effects of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation and neuromuscular electrical stimulation on upper extremity motor recovery in the early period after stroke: a preliminary study

Objective: To assess the efficacy of inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) and neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) on upper extremity motor function in patients with acute/subacute ischemic stroke.Methods: Twenty-five ischemic acute/subacute stroke subjects were enrolled in this randomized controlled trial. Experimental group 1 received low frequency (LF) rTMS to the primary motor cortex of the unaffected side + physical therapy (PT) including activities to improve strength, flexibility, transfers, posture, balance, coordination, and activities of daily living, mainly focusing on upper limb movements; experimental group 2 received the same protocol combined with NMES to hand extensor muscles; and the control group received only PT. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) scan was used to evaluate the activation or inhibition of the affected and unaffected primary motor cortex.Results: No adverse effect was reported. Most of the clinical outcome scores improved significantly in all groups, however no statistically significant difference was found between groups due to the small sample sizes. The highest percent improvement scores were observed in TMS + NMES group (varying between 48 and 99.3%) and the lowest scores in control group (varying between 13.1 and 28.1%). Hand motor recovery was significant in both experimental groups while it did not change in control group. Some motor cortex excitability changes were also observed in fMRI.Conclusion: LF-rTMS with or without NMES seems to facilitate the motor recovery in the paretic hand of patients with acute/subacute ischemic stroke. TMS or the combination of TMS + NMES may be a promising additional therapy in upper limb motor training. Further studies with larger numbers of patients are needed to establish their effectiveness in upper limb motor rehabilitation of stroke.

Is robot-assisted therapy effective in upper extremity recovery in early stage stroke? -a systematic literature review.

[Purpose] The aim of this study was to systematically investigate the effects of robot-assisted therapy on the upper extremity in acute and subacute stroke patients. [Subjects and Methods] The papers retrieved were evaluated based on the following inclusion criteria: 1) design: randomized controlled trials; 2) population: stroke patients 3) intervention: robot-assisted therapy; and 4) year of publication: May 2012 to April 2016. Databased searched were: EMBASE, PubMed and COCHRAN databases. The Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale was used to assess the methodological quality of the included studies. [Results] Of the 637 articles searched, six studies were included in this systematic review. The PEDro scores range from 7 to 9 points. [Conclusion] This review confirmed that the robot-assisted therapy with three-dimensional movement and a high degree of freedom had positive effects on the recovery of upper extremity motor function in patients with early-stage stroke. We think that the robot-assisted therapy could be used to improve upper extremity function for early stage stroke patients in clinical setting.